Contribute



We welcome your contributions to this blog whether in the shape of a letter, article or column. Please send your piece to:

editor@lubpak.com

Note: while we welcome your contributions as comments on this page, please consider at least sending a copy to the above-mentioned email address. Even better, send it as an word document so that we can preserve your desired formatting.

Your comments and views on LUBP will be warmly welcome.

Please note that we will accept and publish a well-written and well-argued piece even if you do not agree with the opinion or the aim of this blog.

If you wish to hide your identity as an author, you may wish to use a pseudonym, anything other than ‘anonymous’.

Saving a copy of your article on your computer may save you the trouble of re-writing if there is an error in mail or publication.

181 responses to “Contribute”

  1. Comments from the old site of LUBP:

    5 COMMENTS:

    Anonymous said…
    160 million Pakistanis have been conned into self distruction

    Game
    This game has been played before when so called peace deal was negotiated in FATA area after the election and broken in a similar way in sort time, which backfired on ANP badly.
    The aim was for pak army to fight American war, with the support of the Pakistani people but this did not work.
    Conspiracy & evidence
    common conception is that America was against sharia law in swat but realty is different,
    check the following,
    Telegraph 17. feb. 2009 writes
    American officials have privately backed Pakistan’s “Sharia law for peace” deal with Taliban militants in the Swat Valley despite publicly criticising it as a “negative development”.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/4681480/US-privately-backs-Pakistans-Sharia-law-for-peace-deal-with-Taliban.html
    journalist and tv anchor Qudsia Kadri also made this very revealing point in Sawal Yeh Hai 6 may
    http://www.siasat.pk/forum/sawal-yeh-hai—6th-may-2009-t3680s60.html

    this is the same game that was played with Iraqi leader sadam hussain before the first iraq war by the Americans,
    their ambassador gave sadam hussain wink and nod to invade Kuwait, so that they will have a pretext to invade Iraq in turn, which they did and had the backing of all the world.

    Same game is played with Pakistani people,
    In swat sharia law is encouraged privately but Americans told the world that they are against this Islamic law,
    They have succeeded again, it seams as all Pakistani people are backing military action against Taliban, where as they were dead against military action before sharia law.
    Thiming
    1)The timing is like an open book,
    After the first failure in fata , swat came into limelight and question of Shariat popped and swat is put on fire.
    Swat Taliban armed covertly as they were getting stronger and stronger,
    2) all of a sudden sufi Muhammad became none violetant
    and a peacefull person to deal and negotiated with, all this time sufi Muhammad and his group is been portrait as moderates.
    3) suddenly Taliban appear in bunair & dir and operation starts straight away,
    4)The elusive Sufi Muhammad and other taliban mullahs come on all tv channels with exclusive interviews in just one or two days,
    saying thinks That any fool would know will not be acceptable to 99% of Pakistanis, but will be music to the ears of the Americans propagandists.
    5)Timed Just before zardaris visit to American masters,

    Anp philosophy
    ANP, the Secular party that was dead against sharia law,
    always wanted to annihilation of political islam,
    how can they embrace sharia law.
    ANP has always tried to hoodwink Pak-army and people to achieve their secular, american, separatist agenda,
    Purpose & goal of America & their agents,

    the purpose of this game was to get the pak army fighting for america, with the support of all pakistanis,
    plus Discredit islam and sharia

    sufi Muhammad motives
    this so called Maulana is very suspect, he knowingly or unknowingly is an agent of America and the west, he has said every thing that our enemy would like to hear from a muslim leader,
    and ever thing the common muslim don’t want to hear,
    the dogma that creates fitna,
    The main supporters of military action,
    america, zardari, PM, altaf’s MQM, bacha khan’s ANP, other coconut, and lafafa journalist, when did last time these actors work for the interest of pakistan. or the betterment Pakistanis ??????????????
    Media
    it makes me laugh and cry to see how most of the media have united to support self distraction.
    it seems that media people are opinion followers rather than opinion makers, no thinking or home work,
    I know Some people will say what is the answer
    There are many different armed groups in this troubled areas,
    Supported by 1)raw 2)CIA 3)Mosad 4) Russia 5) anti Pakistan Afghanis 6) yes Iran 7)Saudi Arabia 8) Pashtoon separatists 9) baloch separatists,10) jihadists 11) alqieda 12)other Islamic firkas, All known as talibans.
    So the army action is not the answer to such cocktail of militants groups.
    This is the job for intelligence agencies,
    It is for SIS to go in, investigate and pick them one by one,
    If the military and the govt were honest with it’s people than this what they should be doing, but they are not honest.
    Dishonesty shows when you think sufi Muhammad and all his gang were left to disappear in to mountains and the innocent people are been bombed and killed for no objective.
    I pray people start thinking rather than have heard mentality.

    11 MAY 2009 17:48
    carsfamily said…
    zardari should resign and face the cases. he should know that bad is good but defamed is worst.

    05 NOVEMBER 2009 19:45
    Faisal said…
    This is the second attempt from Military establishment of Pakistan to take over PPP.In their first attempt,after Shahadat of BB, Military establishment tried to take over PPP through Makhdoom Amin Fahim. Asif Zardari was the one who saved the party of Bhutto’s by defeating all the odds . In their on going attempt they already have back door channels with Anti-Zardari elements in PPP and they think that if they will able to knock down Zardari from Presidency, on one hand they will be able to push a revolt within the PPP against Zardari and on the other hand no Makhdoom or Shah will be able to confront the establishment.
    Geo network is scared of Military establishment and can not afford refuse to become a tool against Co-Chairperson of PPP.Geo lost millions during Musharrf’s 77 days ban on network and can not afford to turn down the dictation from military establishment of Pakistan.Can we do anything to save Pakistan Peoples Party from a military take over?
    Faisal

    06 NOVEMBER 2009 03:54
    Kaleem Ullah said…
    Scriptures on morality uniformly condemned vanity as a sin but look at the audacity of Hamid Mir who was jokingly approached by the host of the “Eik Din Geo Key Sath” for appearing as a celebrity on the show. Our pseudo-intellectual,defender of the faith and staunch proponent of strategic death (sorry depth)was so enamored of the idea, that according to Geo insiders he lobbied for this appearance and is now butt of every media person’s jokes.
    Kaleem

    10 NOVEMBER 2009 11:04
    pkissues said…
    Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari Speech on the Foundation Day of Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLYph178eOY

    26 NOVEMBER 2009 03:30

  2. I am sorry to learn here strenge news blogs, propogandas and mafia by Ahmadi Hellians, and Corrupted Person of the Century >>>>>>> guess Whoooooo……… The one n only yesssssssssssssssss Mr.90%…………………

    I don’t want to discuss on politics today … do you know why?????????? coz I already had loose motions so no need more upsets at once ……….

    But I can give you conclussion of whole story ……… WE Need one Imam Khomani ….. overnight changeover …. otherwise its not enough left to think enough………..

    .

  3. JI – Cain in culpable terrorism

    If in-depth analyses are carried out it will be dawn upon every one that JI has been holding the rank of Cain (Qabil- Prophet Adam pbuh’s son) in culpable terrorism in the country, region and the world at large, which the later have won in culpable homicide in human history.
    The third dictator, Zia-ul-Haque proved himself the most third-rate among the lot and of course he was the worst among the rest. His legacy will haunt the nation, region and world at large. He was so duffer that on loosing the most strategic region of Siachen to Hindus in the so called heyday of Pak-US ties he was fooling the nation by downplaying the importance of Siachen. So whenever he was asked for comment, his reply was always by snuffling; “Siachen is a place where not a single twig of grass grows over there”. Although it was revealed subsequently that apart from strategic importance of Siachen the world rarest rose plants grow only over there!!!
    One of the nastiest tragedies that occurred during Gen Zia-ul-Haque’s 11 years long dark night was arming of JI’s progeny as well as the his own progeny; MQM from top to toe along with granting the training facilities throughout the whole country.
    What the nation is reaping now was sown by the third dictator, Zia-ul-Haque with the help of JI’s progeny which was brought up by the fourth dictator Gen Mush with the help of JI’s progeny during their five years Talibanization in the NWFP. What I say has been my naked eye observation but still for public knowledge I would like to refer only one aspect: You won’t see ever that JI’s top brass would condemn Taliban, Talibanization or their inhuman atrocities, ever!!! If Cain was the pioneer in culpable homicide then JI deserves to be awarded the title of Cain in culpable terrorism.

    Aftab Alam Advocate (HIGH COURT),
    President District Bar Association Swat

    Cell: 0301-8536776

  4. Hi guys, you are very good people. Pakistani judiciary has always been insrumental in serving ant-people and anti democracy interests of the thugs, dictators, tyrants, generals and usurpers. Yesterday’s supreme court’s so called judgement on the HRO also proves once again that although he has changed the clothes but the Emperor remains the same.

  5. now we dont want Pakistan any more , we raze slogan our seprate Land Sindho Desh, Pakistan is for Punjabis punjabis never beare sindhi, baloch, and pushton,
    Punjabis kill Bhuttto, Banazir Bhutto, Shahnawz Bhutto, Murtaza bhutto,
    they never bear sindhi president and Popular Party of Pakistan PPP.

  6. Afghanpur not Pakhtunkhwa

    Let us strike at the root of the trouble. And the only best way-out for resolving our protracted problems is to declare the presently 22 divisions of the country as provinces and each one is declared entitled for equal resources, irrespective of population, topography and area. (Na rahy bans na baji gi bansri).The root cause for all of our basic tribulations is misgovernance and mismanagement because of incompetence of our elites and unmanageability of our masses. But looters are not supposed to be leaders.
    So let us to be confined to this non-issue of renaming this ill fated province of this ill fated country.
    So my suggestion is that ‘Afghanpur’ is more appropriate and more in consonance with the beautiful people of NWFP, hence I suggest ‘Afghanpur’ instead of ‘Pakhtunkhwa’ to be declared the new name of this province. And I have grounds for my suggestion. All of the people of NWFP, including Chitrali speaking, Hindko speaking, Torwali speaking, Gujro speaking, Kohistani speaking, Kalami speaking and Pashto speaking are of course Afghan in origin but not Pakhtun in toto. So to be harmony, suitability and acceptability among all the people ‘Afghanpur’ is more adequate and becoming.

    Aftab Alam Advocate (High Court),
    President District Bar Association Swat

  7. By email:

    From: kaleem.butt

    Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 17:02:48

    To: Dr.Shahid Masood

    Please let it go now. December is gone and so would March. But lost credibility and damaged aura of decency would not be retored.It is a catch-22 for you and your coterie of late night mourners. How to get out of this vicious campaign of slander against democratic government. Ask your handlers.

  8. attn Mr.Nishapuri if u r real giala why u not passing to us mobile.nos of evil force of movement for dictatorship, Kamran khan ,Ansar abbasi,Shahid masood etc and their emails of tv programs we want to show their real faces throgh this technologies thx

  9. Supreme Court CJ imposes judicial martial law in Pakistan
    by Amir Mir

    ——————————————————————————–

    LAHORE, 15 February 2010: A fresh tussle between the Pakistani President Asif Zardari and the Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry over the appointment of the superior court judges has snowballed into a major political crisis which may lead to yet another military intervention by Army Chief General Ashfaq Kayani, who is due to retire this year and wants his tenure to be extended.
    Judicial activism seems to be in top gear in Pakistan as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Iftikhar Chaudhry has literally revolted against the President by rejecting his decision to elevate two judges of the Lahore High Court, including the chief justice of the Punjab province despite the fact that they were elevated in accordance with the seniority principle. The chief justice, who was sacked by President Musharraf in 2007 over corruption charges and reinstated by President Zardari in 2009, insists that the president’s decision was unconstitutional because he was not consulted as per the law of the land. In a dramatic move in the after hours on February 13, the Supreme Court of Pakistan took suo moto notice of the presidential action and suspended the elevation of the two judges by President Asif Zardari.
    However, the government circles say the SC chief justice is trying to impose “judicial dictatorship” by undermining the elected parliament. They add that the Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry had recommended elevation of a junior judge of the Lahore High Court to the Supreme Court while retaining a senior judge, Khawaja Sharif, as Chief Justice of Lahore High Court. They argue that the chief justice’s recommendation was in violation of the apex court’s own verdict in 2002 which had set out the principle of seniority for appointment and elevation of the superior court judges. Therefore, they add, the recommendation was rejected by President Zardari.
    While the main opposition leader Nawaz Sharif has decided to openly side with the judiciary in the fresh battle between the executive and the judiciary, dubbing the president as the biggest threat to democracy, the government circles say the chief justice has openly declared war against a fragile democracy at the behest of the Pakistan army and the right wing pro-Taliban leaders of the Muslim League. According to Fauzia Wahab, the central secretary information of the ruling PPP, the right-wing military-judiciary-opposition parties’ axis of evil has taken its dagger out for a final attack on the democratically elected government of the left-wing Pakistan People’s Party.
    However, the federal government intends to challenge the apex court’s action. The official circles in Islamabad claim that the chief justice was consulted but his recommendation was rejected by the president because he happens to be the final authority to appoint and elevate judges of superior courts. Yet those close to the chief justice say he is contemplating to initiate contempt of court proceedings against the president and the prime minister from February 18 for overlooking his recommendations for elevation of the two judges who are considered close to Zardari’s political rival and opposition leader Nawaz Sharif. Therefore, it is said, the president wanted to get rid of the Lahore High Court’s chief justice Khawaja Sharif and therefore elevated him to the apex court. It may be recalled that the majority of judges currently sitting in the Supreme Court and Lahore High Court are of Punjabi origin, most of them are known for their loyalties to right-wing Pakistan Muslim League and Jamaat-e-Islami; some of them are also known to have a populist anti-West and pro-Taliban inclination.
    According to legal experts, the constitutional position pertaining to the elevation of the superior court judges is that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is only a consultee, and it is the president of Pakistan who has the ultimate authority to take a final decision. However, the chief justice, having suspended the presidential orders on February 13, has already constituted a three member apex court bench which is to decide whether or not the presidnetial action of February 13 was constitutional. But the chief justice’s action of suspending the presidential orders within three hours of their issuance has been described by the PPP circles as a judicial martial law which might eventually pave the way for yet another military intervention by the outgoing Army Chief General Kayani.
    Courtesy: Middle Eastern Transparent (www.metransparent.com)

  10. Please send it to every where
    Please take action against Chief Justice of Sharif Brotheran,Ahtazazan and anti Pakistan Jnab Ifthekhar Chouduary Saib.
    9. Over Media is honest but not professional, easily can be trapped by any traitor of this country. As proof following proved facts are mentioned.
    10. Please don’t destroy your self and say words which are not justiceful. Because according to Hadith all words are accumulated and same returns to its speaker.AND where justice will not be observed there severe punishment by the God could be seen. If person ,home or any will do they will face but if judge will do injustice whole nation will bear AZAB.
    11. Decision against NRO is not matter but where is justice, about 10 Years old Proved case,which is pending with Supreme Court about conspiracy against this country Same like Bangladesh (Country was broken by Nawaz Sharif and others that day when Nawaz Saib took amount to restrain PPP from Punjab) Same like Bangladesh.
    4. Decision against NRO is not matter but where is justice, when Chief Justice of Sharif Brotheran,Ahtazazan and anti Pakistan Jnab Ifthekhar Chouduary Saib.Reinstated first time after deal with Musharaf that Musharaf will take bake 70%allegatios against Chief Justice of Sharif Brotheran,Ahtazazan and anti Pakistan Jnab Ifthekhar Chouduary Saib and after that CJ will give decision in favour of Musharaf with uniform president election .Pubulic and record is witness it was done same as deal.President took back 70% allegation and Chief Justice of Sharif Brotheran,Ahtazazan and anti Pakistan Jnab Ifthekhar Chouduary Saib.
    did same)gave decision in favor of Mushraf that he can participate in election with uniform.
    12. Decision against NRO is not matter but where is justice,Chief Justice of Sharif Brotheran,Ahtazazan and anti Pakistan Jnab Ifthekhar Chouduary Saib did not take any action about billion of rupees remitted by banks in favour of Sharif families and they handed over their minor properties to NAB before going from Pakistan after NRO with Musharaf Saib.
    13. Decision against NRO is not matter but where is justice,Chief Justice of Sharif Brotheran,Ahtazazan and anti Pakistan Jnab Ifthekhar Chouduary,he did not take Sue Motto action against those advocates who abused to Pak Army when he was addressing to Lahore Bar for his restoration.
    14. Decision against NRO is not matter but where is justice,Chief Justice of Sharif Brotheran,Ahtazazan and anti Pakistan Jnab Ifthekhar Chouduary Saib did not take any action against sugar mill owner on sugar prices issue because most were linked with Nawaz league.
    15. Decision against NRO is not matter but where is justice,Chief Justice of Sharif Brotheran,Ahtazazan and anti Pakistan Jnab Ifthekhar Chouduary, where is Sue motto action against his son’s Corrupt
    16. Were is justice about FIR against him self Chief Justice when dozen People were killed in Karachi just because Chief Justice refused to go back from Karachi despite after saying by Govt and wanted the massacre.
    9.Were is justice about recent interview of Peervaiz Ellehe to Hamid Mir Saib on 17-01-10 about 12 Million remitted bank loan for Shabaz Sharif .
    10. Were is justice when cj write final decision of NRO and mentioined Shahabnama, poetry and moral lectures but he did not see himself that one judge can not give or participate in any case which is personalize against judge and in same case president clearly had said that cj is corrupt in his personal case and president will not reinstate him. So this decision is un justice and can not implemented.
    11. Chief justice saib is really great and honest ,sorry above mentioned facts are true but now after reading your NRO decision whole muslin world will prude on CJ that he did not protected himself , did not care himself during writing this decision against NRO,as CJ mentioned that all self created decision of Attorney General including about ending case of Switzerland was wrong and all decision are canceled ,so clearly 70% allegations against CJ Ifthekhar before first time reinstatement was taken back by Attorney General of Musharaf GOVT. So now case against CJ has been reopened again because that order also has been canceled . Due to back of 70% allegations CJ was exonerated by the Bench.
    12. Justice Qayum should have mentioned point No.11 in his review petition but most advocates has no awareness about the law that how to fight under law.
    13 It is justice that one minister Rehman malik had to appear in same day in 3 courts ,Lahore ,rawalpindi and peshawer,he requested to extend his tow cases for next dates but refused just to give him contempt of court on none appearance.

  11. CHIEF JUSTICE IS GREAT JUDGE OF MUSLIM WORLD AFTER KHULFA-E-RASHEDEEN ON THIS POINT OF NRO DECISION.
    1. Chief justice saib is really great and honest ,after reading NRO decision whole muslin world will proud on CJ that he did not protected himself , did not care about himself during writing this decision against NRO,as CJ mentioned that all orders of Attorney General including about ending case of Switzerland was wrong and all decision are canceled ,so clearly order of Attorney General regarding 70% allegations against CJ Ifthekhar Ch. before first time reinstatement was taken back by Attorney General of Musharaf GOVT. So now case 70% allegation against CJ has been reopened again because that order also has been canceled . Due to back of 70% allegations CJ was exonerated by the Bench. In remaining 30% allegations.
    2. Those 70% allegations against CJ has been automatically opened and CJ has to leave his present position , hearing will be started against CJ.
    3. On this great decision thanks CJ Saib.

  12. میرے رسول کہ نسبت تجھے اجالوں سے
    میں تیرا ذ کر کروں صبح کے حوالوں سے

    نہ میری نعت کی محتاج ہے ذات تیری
    نہ تیری مدح ہے ممکن مرے خیالوں سے

    تو روشنی کا پیامبر ہے اور میری تاریخ
    بھری پڑری ہے شعبے ظلم کی مثالوں سے

    تیرا پیام محبت تھا اور مرے یہاں
    دل و دماغ ہیں پر ، نفرتوں کے جالوں سے

    میرے ضمیر نے قابیل کو نہیں بخشا
    میں کیسسے صُلح کروں قتل کرنے والوں سے

    میں بے بساط سا شاعر ہوں مگر کرم تیرا
    کا باشرف ہوں قبا و کلہ والوں سے

    احمد فراز

  13. I was born in the east although i am a whitey. The west has said it has put 140000troops into Afghanistan(some of them in Pakistan) to protect the people,then it was to destroy the the drugs, then to rid the teritory of Taliban! The real reason is the US lost face over the twin towers and the rest of the “coalition sheep” follow theUS so as to keep their people safe from theTaliban bogeyman! My question to your readers is this; why do you allow “lard assed lal bundors” to get their beauty sleep in the west,while your peoples and infrastruture are used as a battle ground?

  14. The Admim Pkpolitics.com does not release my comment in time. Some times he absolutely ignores. I sent him several emails but all in vain. Today I sent him the following email. I shall be thankful to you if you spare some moments to have a look on it. Thanks & regards.
    Khalid Wasti. Maryland USA
    احتجاج
    ====
    محترمی ایڈمن صاحب پی کے پالیٹکس
    بارہا آپ کو مطلع کر چکا ہوں کہ ایک طویل عرصہ سے میرے کمینٹس بروقت ریلیز نہیں کیے جاتے اور کئی مرتبہ تو مکمل طور پر نظر انداز کر دئیے گئے –
    کمینٹس دیتے ہوئے ظاہر ہے کہ میں اپنا نقطہءنظر بیان کرتا ہوں ، کسی دوسرے کی ترجمانی تو کر نہیں سکتا – وہی کچھ کہوں گا جو میری سوچ اور ضمیر سے ہم آہنگ ہو گا – البتہ یہ ذمہ داری ہر شخص پر عائد ہوتی ہے کہ وہ تبصرہ کرتے ہوئے تہذیب اور شائستگی کے تمام تقاضوں کو مد نظر رکھے – اس پہلو سے ہمیشہ احتیاط کی ہے کہ کوئی اعتراض وارد نہ ہو سکے –
    جہاں تک میرے نظریات کا تعلق ہے میں ہمیشہ لبرل ، ڈیموکریٹ ، ترقی پسند ، روشن خیال ، مذہب کی بدلتے ہوئے عہد سے ہم آہنگ اور قابل عمل تعبیرات کرنے والوں کا معترف رہا ہوں – میرے کمینٹس انہی رجحانات کے آئینہ دار ہوتے ہیں – ظاہر ہے کہ میں متعصب ، رجعت پرست ، فرسودہ تصورات ، جہالت ، پسماندگی ،
    انتہا پسندی اور صورت حال کو جوں کا توں (سٹیٹس کو) رکھنے والی قوتوں کی تائید اور ترجمانی تو نہیں کر سکتا –
    میرے کمینٹس پر ناروا پابندیوں کی وجہ اگر میرے افکار و تصورات ہیں تو یہ ترقی یافتہ معاشروں میں آزادیءاظہار کے حق کو صلب کرنے اور امتیازی سلوک کے مترادف ہے جو بجائے خود ایک جرم ہے –
    جیسا کہ بارہا پہلے بھی کہہ چکا ہوں، اگر میرے کمینٹس آپ کے لیئے باعث اعتراض ہیں تو براہ کرم مجھے آگاہ کیجیئے تاکہ اگر اصلاح کی ضرورت ہو تو اسےبروئے کار لایا جا سکے
    خیر اندیش
    خالد واسطی

  15. @Khalid Wasti Dr Mr Wasti, We are sorry to learn about the difficulties you are facing at pkpolitics. Let us hope that the administrative team of pkpolitics will address your concerns.

    In the meanwhile, feel free to post your comments or contribute your articles on LUBP. Although this blog is liberal and progressive in its orientation, we do not censor or discourage any differing opinion as long as the arguments are presented in a civilized manner.

  16. Ahmadis are not muslim. why you ppp are defending Ahmadis that were out lawed by the hero of pakistan zulfikar Ali Bhutto. you should follow your leader.

  17. Khawaja Shafique :
    Ahmadis are not muslim. why you ppp are defending Ahmadis that were out lawed by the hero of pakistan zulfikar Ali Bhutto. you should follow your leader.

    We are following Rafizi Jinnah who appointed the First Quadiyani Foreign Minister for the “so-called Islamic Republic of Pakistan” founded on the basis of a IRRELEVANT TWO NATION THEORY concocted by a Known Haidth Rejector Racist Sir Syed Ahmed Khan.

  18. I have tried to post my comments on pkpolitics but they sensor it right away. pkpolitics claims that it is an unbiased site but they do not let my comments go. They have permanently blocked my comments. Any anti Bhutto comments are posted doesn’t matter how bad the language is goes through as long as anti Bhutto sentiment is in the comments. Shame on pkpolitics admin.

  19. Ahmadies were not out lawed by ZAB. They were declared non-Muslims not, non-humans. They have and should have all rights as any other citizen of Pakistan. As far as they are not involved in any criminal activity, they should enjoy their rights. Please do not try to impose mullahism in Pakistan.

  20. I have seen so may talk shows that PPP reps are not answering the anchors correctly. When anchor or PML(N) or other parties rep say that judiciary is ‘independent’ why don’t they say that this judiciary is not independent, this judiciary is biased and it (the judiciary) protects PML(N) and JI interests only. why is CJ not taking any suomoto action against ghundagardi of JI in Punjab University. Bringing the facts about these judges, their personal favors to their family members (due to judges positions) in the past should be brought to the media attention. Let us bring the facts. .

  21. Also the way the CJ is acting after restoration proves the position of AAZ why he did not want to restore CJ.

  22. Khalid wasti sahib,

    Why dont you start writing in express or jang. You seem to have a real good understanding of Pakistani politics and you also have some really good writing skills.

  23. I think these officers named in UN report should be imprisoned and sent to police remand so that they tell the truth. Javed Cheema, Nadeem Ajaz and Saood Khan will I am sure name Mush/GHQ for this murder.

  24. Just wanted to bring this thing to your notice :-
    The fake BB letter to Peter Gailbraith dated 1990 has re surfaced again and making round on the Interweb (eg here http://www.facebook.com/#!/note.php?note_id=429100675648&comments) . It would definitely be necessary that you come up with a strong, conclusive and authoritative post in this regard. I am not a PPP activist or worker but I feel that bad mouthing politicians, especially through fake means has been the establishments tool since time immemorial and it would be necessary that the young impressionable minds aren’t just thrown at propaganda by the establishment.

    The most ironic thing is that it has emerged when the ISI, MI and the entire establishment is under fire and possible scrutiny for its involvement in the entire BB assassination episode. They are yet again trying to flog dead horses (who were fake even the first time around) and trying to divert attention from their own “rogue” acts.

    It is highly pathetic to see that this old forgery has re surfaced again and the reasons are obvious to me.

    Firstly, even back in 1990 it was proven to be a forgery. As NYT noted, ” But the frenzied efforts to portray Ms. Bhutto as a tool of the Americans are beginning to backfire. This week, an adviser to Nawaz Sharif, president of the Islamaic Democratic Alliance and the leading candidate for Prime Minister if Ms. Bhutto’s party is defeated, circulated a letter purporting to be written by Ms. Bhutto to Peter Galbraith. Mr. Galbraith, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee staff, is a friend of Ms. Bhutto’s from college days at Harvard.

    The letter, however, is so patently a forgery that it has made the Islamic Democratic Alliance look foolish.

    Apart from the inexplicably formal salutation, ”Dear Peter Galbraith,” the letter misspells as Solarzs the name of Representative Stephen J. Solarz, the chairman of the House subcommittee on Asian affairs, It asks Mr. Galbraith to ”please use your influence on V. P. Singh the Indian Prime Minister, to engage the Pakistan Army on the borders, so that they do not impede my way.’”

    Source : http://www.nytimes.com/1990/10/18/world/bhutto-facing-new-misconduct-charges.html?pagewanted=1

    What is amazing is that the PML-Q used this old forgery in their election campaign in 2008 as well. It was printed in leading newspapers on Nov 14, 2007.

    What is highly disappointing is that every freaking uneducated, illiterate and pathetic blogger thinks that he can be the most objective and informative political analyst and without verification (or purposely) spreads lies and forgeries across the blogosphere and effects negatively the free thought of citizens.

  25. Uncontrolled Jihadi Literature in Pakistan
    After Namaz-e-Jumma you can find lots of books and news papers are being sell outside the mosque most of the books are written by unknown person ,in Countries Saudi Arabia and Iran ,No one can publish any religious material without the approval by concern authorities ,But in Pakistan every thing is allowed ,Pro Taliban ,Sectarian and religious hatred is being published in Pakistan without any check and balance .No “Islamic ” country as free as Pakistan .
    Jehaadi Litrature by Hamid Akhtar
    Part 1
    http://www.pkcolumns.com/2009/11/12/jehaadi-litrature-by-hamid-akhtar/
    Part 2
    http://www.pkcolumns.com/2009/11/13/jehaadi-litrature-by-hamid-akhtar-2/
    Part 3
    http://www.pkcolumns.com/2009/11/15/jehaadi-litrature-by-hamid-akhtar-3/

  26. Another master piece by Nadeem Farooq Paracha…

    http://blog.dawn.com/2010/04/29/a-tale-of-two-calls/comment-page-2/#comment-74085


    I think The youth of Pakistan should ask Munawer hasan ,Qazi ,Imran khan ,Hameed Gul ,Mufti ,Generals and movies to go themselves to Jihad as they promote and ask youth to go and fight , why they support Taliban but do not join them ? Jamaat Islami should leave Mansura for IDPs and join Taliban if they think they are right .
    There Jamaatis ,Taliban support Generals ,Muftis and Mullas living lavish life style in Pakistan settled cities and promoting war and terrorism and creating chaos in the county becasue they know that they cannot get into power by votes so they think this is the only way to get the power my destroying the nation

  27. ISI,JI secret service agent Zaid Hamid has said that Ajmal Qassab is actually a hindu ,But the reality is he is a Pakistan ,His parents are alive ,People from his Village know him ……But still he is not Pakistani 🙂

    Why No Jamaati ,Imrani firqa ,Ziaist General do not protest on his arrest in india ? if that was all drama then they should support this “poor” Pakistani Citizen .Why all The Jamatized media are Silent ? Because “Chor ki Dari main Tinka ”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xbrCaTebL0

    http://tribune.com.pk/story/11701/will-the-real-zaid-hamid-please-stand-up/

  28. Jamatized media created hype of Dr Afia case but not discussing Ajmal Qassab case ,Those who have been saying this is the “drama ” against Pakistan and silent ,This is the Tactics of ISI jihad , First support ,then deny
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajmal_Kasab
    Ajmal Kasab
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Jump to: navigation, search
    Gnome globe current event.svg
    This article is about a person involved in a current event. Information may change rapidly as the event progresses. (May 2010)
    This article is move-protected until May 10, 2010.
    Mohammed Ajmal Amir Kasab

    Kasab in the Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus during the 2008 Mumbai attacks
    Born 13 July 1987 (1987-07-13) (age 22)[1]
    Faridkot, Okara, Pakistan
    Motive Islamic terrorism
    Conviction(s) Murder
    Conspiracy
    Waging war on India
    Possessing explosives
    Penalty Death sentence
    Status Sentenced to death

    Mohammed Ajmal Amīr Kasāb (Urdu: محمد اجمل امیر قصاب; born 13 July 1987) is a Pakistani Islamic terrorist who was involved in the 2008 Mumbai attacks.[2][3] Ajmal Amir is the only attacker captured alive by police and is currently in Indian custody. The Government of Pakistan initially denied that Ajmal was from Pakistan, but in January 2009, it officially [4] accepted that Ajmal Amir Kasab is a Pakistani citizen. On 3 May 2010, an Indian court convicted him of murder, waging war on India, possessing explosives, and other charges.[5] On 6 May 2010, the same trial court sentenced him to death on four counts and to a life sentence on five others.
    Contents
    [hide]

    * 1 Background
    o 1.1 Early life
    o 1.2 Training
    + 1.2.1 Stages of training
    * 2 Involvement in 2008 Mumbai attacks
    o 2.1 Nationality
    * 3 Police interrogation
    o 3.1 Naming confusion
    o 3.2 Confessions
    + 3.2.1 Confessions on video
    o 3.3 Other reports
    * 4 Legal issues
    * 5 Trial
    * 6 See also
    * 7 References
    * 8 External links

    Background

    Kasab was born in Faridkot village in the Okara District of Punjab, Pakistan. His father makes a living selling dahi puri [6][7] while his elder brother Afzal, 25, works as a laborer in Lahore.[7] His elder sister, Rukaiyya Husain, is married in the village.[7] A younger sister Suraiyya, and brother Munir, live in Faridkot with the parents.[7][8]

    According to reports, the village of Faridkot is quite poor with a remote feel, despite being close to a town. Most people have little education and live in poverty. On the side of a building, just outside Faridkot, graffiti in large lettering says, in Urdu, “Go for jihad. Go for jihad. Markaz Dawat ul-Irshad”. ‘Markaz Dawat ul-Irshad’ is a parent organization of Lashkar-e-Taiba.[9]
    Early life

    He briefly joined his brother in Lahore, who worked as a labourer, and then returned to Faridkot.[10][11]

    He left home after a fight with his father in 2005.[7] He had asked for new clothes on Eid, but his father could not provide them, which made him angry.[12] He then became involved in petty crime with his friend Muzaffar Lal Khan, soon moving on to armed robbery.[10] On 21 December 2007, Bakr-Eid day, they were in Rawalpindi trying to buy weapons when they encountered members of Jama’at-ud-Da’wah, the political wing of Lashkar-e-Taiba, distributing pamphlets. After a brief chat, they decide to sign up for training with the Lashkar-e-Taiba, ending up at their base camp, Markaz Taiba.

    Initial reports offered a conflicting view of Ajmal Amir as fluent in English, and from a middle class background.[13] However, an interrogator and deputy commissioner of the Mumbai Police stated that he spoke rough Hindi and barely any English.[14]

    Some sources said his father asked him to join the militant group, Lashkar-e-Taiba so that he could use the money they gave him to run the family.[15][16] When asked about this, Ajmal Amir’s father told reporters, “I don’t sell my sons.”[17]

    Villagers of Okara, Ajmal Amir’s native village, claimed on camera, that he was at their village six months before the Mumbai attack. They also said that Ajmal Amir asked his mother to bless him as he was going for Jihad. They also claimed that he demonstrated his wrestling skills to a few village boys that day.[18]
    Training

    Ajmal Amir is alleged to be among a group of 24 men[19] who received training in marine warfare at a remote camp in mountainous Muzaffarabad in Pakistan-administered Kashmir. Part of the training is reported to have taken place on the Mangla Dam reservoir.[20]

    Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, a senior commander of the Lashkar-e-Taiba, reportedly offered to pay his family Rs.150,000 for his participation in the attacks.[21] Another report said the 21-year old man was recruited from his Punjab, Pakistan, home in part based on a pledge by recruiters to pay USD $1,250 US (Pakistani Rs. 62,412.50) to his family when he became a martyr.[22] Other sources put the reward to USD $4,000.[6]
    Stages of training

    This batch of 25 went through the following stages of training:

    * Psychological: Indoctrination to Islamist propaganda, including compiled footage of Indian atrocities in Jammu & Kashmir,[23][24] and imagery of atrocities suffered by Muslims in India, Chechnya, Palestine and across the globe.[25][26][27]
    * Basic Combat: Lashkar’s basic combat training and terror methodology course, the Daura Aam.
    * Advanced Training: Selected to undergo advanced combat training at a camp near Mansehra, a course the organisation calls the Daura Khaas.[24] This includes advanced weapons and explosives training supervised by retired personnel of the Pakistan Army,[28] along with survival training and further indoctrination.
    * Commando Training: Finally, an even smaller group selected for specialized commando tactics training and marine navigation training given to the Fedayeen unit selected in order to target Mumbai.

    From the batch of about 25, 10 were handpicked for the Mumbai mission.[29] They also received training in swimming and sailing, besides the use of high-end weapons and explosives under the supervision of LeT commanders. According to a media report citing an unnamed former Defence Department Official of the US, the intelligence agencies of the US had determined that the former officers from Pakistan’s Army and Inter-Services Intelligence agency assisted actively and continuously in training.[30] They were given blueprints of all the four targets – Taj Mahal Palace & Tower, Oberoi Trident hotel and Nariman House.

  29. When you ask Jamaat islami “Is there any cross boarder terrorist ? they say “Yeh sab jhoot aur propaganda hay Kashimir main sirf kashimiri ler rahay hain
    and on the other side they are keep sending youth for “Jihad ” .There are Hundreds of proofs which can present in the court to declare Jamaat Islami as “Anti State ” and “terrorist ” group .
    http://www.jasarat.com/epaper/mmdetails.php?date=11-05-2010&file=20&category=nation

    http://www.jasarat.com/unicode/detail.php?category=3&newsid=31988

    2010-02-26 00:00:00 PSTمنور حسن کی کشمیر میں شہید محمد اقبال کے اہلخانہ سے ملاقات

    کراچی(اسٹاف رپورٹر) امیر جماعت اسلامی پاکستان سید منورحسن نے مقبوضہ کشمیر میں شہید ہونے والے کراچی کے نوجوان حزب المجاہدین کے ڈسٹرکٹ کمانڈرمحمد اقبال المعروف ابوبکرکے اہلخانہ سے ان کی رہائش گاہ پرملاقات کی ہے ۔اس موقع پر ان کے ساتھ جماعت اسلامی کراچی کے امیر محمد حسین محنتی‘ سیکرٹری حافظ نعیم الرحمن‘ سابق ٹاﺅن ناظم فاروق نعمت اللہ‘ محمد مسلم‘ نسیم صدیقی‘ منعم ظفرو دیگر رہنما بھی موجود تھے۔ سید منورحسن نے شہید محمد اقبال کی مغفرت اوربلندی درجات کی دعا کی۔ منورحسن نے اس موقع پر کہا کہ اسلام کے بنیادی عقائد میںآخرت کا عقیدہ بہت بنیادی اورواضح ہے‘ انسانی زندگی کی تعمیر میں موت کاتصور اورآخرت کی فکر اوراللہ سے ملاقات کا یقین برائیوں سے بچنے اورنیکی اختیار کرنے کا وسیلہ ہے۔ انہوںنے کہاکہ حضور اکرمنی10برس مدینے میں گزارے اس عرصے میں کئی معرکوں میں وہ خود شریک ہوئے اورکئی معرکوں میں صحابہ کرام ؓ کو شرکت کیلئے بھیجا۔ قرآن میں 486 آیات وہ ہیں جو آیات جہاد کہلاتی ہیں‘ آج امت مسلمہ مصائب میں گھری ہوئی ہے‘ مسلمانوں کو نرم چارہ سمجھ لیا گیا ہے‘ امریکا جہاد کو بدنام کرنے کیلئے اسے دہشت گردی کانام دے رہا ہے‘ مگر عوام نے ہر جگہ علم جہاد بلند کرکے نبی کریم سے اپنی والہانہ محبت کا اظہار کیا ہے۔ لبنان کے حزب اللہ ہوں یافلسطین کے حماس یا مقبوضہ کشمیر کے حزب المجاہدین ‘ ان سب کے مقاصد ایک ہیں‘ انہوںنے کہاکہ نماز بھی نبی کریم سے ثابت ہے اورجہاد بھی ‘ کشمیر میں گزشتہ 22 سال سے جہاد ہورہا ہے۔ پوری دنیا کے اندر مقبوضہ کشمیر ایسا علاقہ ہے جہاں چھوٹی سی وادی میں بھارت کی 7لاکھ فوجیں ظلم ڈھارہی ہیں اور انسانی حقوق کی کھلی خلاف ورزی ہورہی ہے۔ انہوںنے کہاکہ امریکا کے نزدیک قابل تعریف وہی ہے جو اس کی غلامی اختیار کرلے مگرمحمد کے غلام کسی قیمت پر امریکا کی غلامی قبول نہیں کرسکتے۔ انہوں نے مزید کہاکہ محمد اقبال نے شہید ہوکر ہمیں پیغام دیا ہے کہ شہادت کی موت قابل رشک موت ہے‘ محمد اقبال نے سعادت کی زندگی اورشہادت کی موت پائی۔ادھر جماعت اسلامی حلقہ خواتین سندھ کی ناظمہ افشاں نوید نے شہید محمد اقبال کی والدہ اور بہنوں سے ملاقات کرتے ہوئے کہا کہ جذبہ جہاد اور شوق شہادت کے بغیر اسلامی زندگی کا تصور ادھورا ہے‘ رتبہ شہادت حاصل کرنا بڑی فضیلت والاعمل ہے‘ حقیقت یہ ہے کہ دنیا میں مسلمانوں کے عروج کی داستان جہاد سے ہی وابستہ ہے۔اس موقع پرافشاں نوید نے شہید کی والدہ اور بہنوں کو محمداقبال کی شہادت پر مبارکباد دی اور شہید کے بلندی درجات کے لیے دعا کرائی۔علاوہ ازیں شہیدمحمد اقبال کی غائبانہ نماز جنازہ آج بعد نمازعشاءجیفکو گراو ¿نڈ نارتھ ناظم آباد بلاک ایل لنڈی کوتل چورنگی میں ادا کی جائے گی جس کی امامت سید منورحسن کریں گے۔واضح رہے کہ شہید محمد اقبال گزشتہ 9برس مقبوضہ کشمیر میں بھارتی فوج کے خلاف مصروف جہاد رہے ‘انہوں نے کئی معرکوں میں حصہ لیا اور اپنی شجاعت و بہادری کے جوہر دکھائے جبکہ 19 فروری 2010ءکو قابض فوج سے لڑتے ہوئے جام شہادت نوش کرگئے۔ اس معرکے میں 5بھارتی فوجی اور 2پولیس اہلکار مارے گئے جبکہ 3زخمی بھی ہوئے۔

  30. December 28, 2009
    Free Judiciary and the Power Gamble

    Hussain Bux Mallah writes about the recent rulings by the democratically restored judiciary in Pakistan and wonders whether the rulings abet and strengthen the growing non-democratic forces.

    Related Links
    Aitzaz Ahsan’s Presentation at NYCBA
    Pakistani Journalists Have Stepped Up
    A Critical Media Necessary for Democracy
    State Complicit in Repression of Media

    [I am writing this because being Sindhi I do not deserve “contempt of court” because me and my nation’s status of inefficiency may be taken as disqualification for contempt of court.]

    Recent verdict of Supreme Court of Pakistan on some frozen constitutional petitions has invited people to think over the power gamble and role of the freed judiciary of Pakistan. The Supreme Court had pulled out old and some un-admitted petition for hearing after dismissal of more than 100 PCO and non-PCO judges. Interestingly all criminal and civil cases against politicians, merchants and civilian government official discussed by 17 honourable justices of Pakistan were filed after the end of General Zia’s military government till the start of last Musharraf’s military government.

    Pakistan’s supreme judiciary was made dysfunctional by a military government through an executive order extra-constitutionally and all judges were restored by democratic government again by an executive extra-constitutional order but the democratic government, however, had a moral leverage to restore the judiciary of Pakistan. After restoration, the Supreme Court had promised to eradicate corruption from judiciary first and continued functioning as a first ever freed judiciary of Pakistan and released Khatib of Lal Masjid, Maulana Abdul Aziz and Lahore High Court released Jamaatud Dawa’s chief Hafiz Mohammad Saeed by one stroke. Sharif brothers were given relief from disqualification and plane conspiracy cases. The apex court had not accepted pardon a written agreement between the Sharif’s family and military government of Pakistan which was presented by Sindh Advocate General.

    Apparently some media anchors bluntly motivated and determined to get rid of first elected Sindhi President of Pakistan Asif Ali Zardari. No doubt they have lot to say about his corruption and criminality and about his inefficiency to rule an Islamic Republic State of Pakistan. The President of Pakistan General Musharraf had publicly announced Sindhis as an inefficient nation and some reputable anchors of electronic media have outstandingly are following General’s verdict. Amazingly some well educated media anchors have introduced a new political term “Sindh Card” in 21st century’s politics of Pakistan keeping in mind “Jag Punjabi Jag” as Punjab Card, Pakhtunkhwa as NWFP Card and Azad Balochistan as Balochistan Card. It is interesting that all card games are with four colour cards and the liberated print and electronic media are playing all cards well. I have seen people with covering heads with colourful Topis all over Pakistan including Sindh, Southern part of Punjab, all over Balochistan and Pakhtunkhwa except northern Punjab. If some people dislike colourful Topi that means that they do not want to see a colourful Pakistan but want to change it as a dormant and violent and Jihadis’s Pakistan.

    I was not shocked to hear a public statement or a verdict of a justice for to hang Musharraf publicly and a justice’s comments that more 80,000 politicians, merchants and civilian government official are dacoits and killers who can not be protected. Before that my understanding was different that an accused is not a criminal until proved I don’t know whether it is true or not. And it was not surprising to me that clerics like Aziz and Saeed were freed to move and operate with legitimate protection of supreme judiciary. I was not shocked to see name of Begum Nusrat Bhutto on top of NAB’s list it is not new to me because it is a legend which is always adopted by loyalists of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Both newly liberated fifth and sixth pillars of Pakistan being Islamists are not free to trial or to convict any deceased leader of and if they were allowed by their doctrine of Islam they must had put the name of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto on top of NAB’s list.

    The Statement of Benazir Bhutto during a press conference in Dubai that an ethnic Sindhi populist and federalist prime minister was hanged after severe torture and by inhuman ways and an ethnic Punjabi prime minister was excused and allowed by supreme powers to go away in a sacred state. The statement of BB was not new in Pakistan’s politics and surprising but was very common during first partition of Pakistan.

    Many intellectuals have asserted that Zardari was capable to handle Pakistan government like Sonia Gandhi but not as an elected president of Pakistan. They may be right but Pakistan Army and the intelligence agencies before and after judicial murder of ZA Bhutto had deliberately invited non-professional politicians on the basis of various ethnicities, sects and castes and opened doors of power for non-political elements. Now the individuals and institutions are striving for power gain but in India the military had never tired to rule their country but they always had limited themselves to their professional work.

    Being an inefficient Sindhi I am clear that we have two options Zardari or Zawahiri. All anti democratic forces conspiring against democratic forces and an elected government of Pakistan or not loyal of Pakistan but they are loyal of Zawahiri. I am seeing greater scope for Zawahiri than Zardari but being an inefficient with colourful Topi and surrounded by thousands of colourful shrines in southern Punjab, Balochistan, Pakhtunkhwa and Sindh I still hope for survival of democratic Pakistan. And I also hope that people will resist against any type of conspiracy against democratic government of Pakistan.

    Hussain Bux can be reached at hussainnixATyahooDOTcom

  31. January 20, 2010
    Prejudice Media Anchors and establishment

    Hussain Bux Mallah writes that media biases in Pakistan continue to destabilize a democratically elected government.

    Related Links
    Aitzaz Ahsan’s Presentation at NYCBA
    Free Judiciary and the Power Gamble
    A Critical Media Necessary for Democracy
    State Complicit in Repression of Media

    It is a common assumption of Salariat middle class of Pakistan that India, America and Israel are common enemy of Islam and Pakistan. A large number of media anchors, writers and intellectual from emerging middle class of Pakistan particularly some media anchors of Geo group are in agitation mode against the democratic government in Pakistan. They believe that politicians are not a force to save Islam and Pakistan from external anti-Islam forces but Pakistan army and its secret agencies is the last option for existence Islamic state of Pakistan.

    The word “establishment” is well defined recently by senior politician Choudhri Aitzaz Hussain and the president of Pakistan Asif Ali Zardari. Both leaders have illustrated well the term “establishment” that it is not a permanent body but changed overtime. It is presumed that head of military and secret agency or second tier senior officers waiting for those posts may play a role to establish a new body of the establishment to deteriorate or confiscate a political government. It is fact that establishment is a mind set and it is obviously a mind set of middle class scared of any damage to Islamic identity of Pakistan by external powers.

    The chief justice of Pakistan was restored extra legally by road power with effective intervention of sitting General Kiani. Choudhri Aitzaz and Mian Shahbaz Sharif had illegitimate meetings with Genera Kiani to put pressure on elected leaders of Pakistan to restore CJ by an executive order. The intellectuals of Pakistan are criticizing that delayed decision of civil government and posturing that delay as major cause of tension between freed judiciary and civil government of Pakistan. That means that judiciary is biased because it was not restored honourably and with legal manors but by establishment’s pressure. The recent verdict on NRO of freed judiciary is also being criticized by senior politicians and lawyers.

    It is difficult to assume recent body of the establishment because its membership is open for all and there is no cut of date. The head of ISI had refused to go India for joint investigation of Mumbai disaster and refused to appear before UN commission on killing of a great leader of Islamic state of Pakistan.

    The democratic government has defended two major hits by establishment one was restoration of judiciary and second one is decision on NRO. The different bodies of establishment decides different ways for disempowering a political government which wants to fight jihadis and wants friendly relations with neighbouring country and world powers.

    The freed media anchors are not interesting to explore ISPR’s rustic news that five terrorists killed and two soldiers injured in Orakzai military operation. The media researchers are not interested to explore disappearance of political activists. They are bound not legally but morally not to interview any sitting Army general or ISI officer responsible for killing of Nawab Akbar Bugti. But feel responsible for scrutiny of little daughter of a sitting chief justice and through untiring effort they easily reach departments secrets. They are interested to analysis President’s speech to dig out word “Qasoor” used 65 times. Another torch bearer anchor is interested in attire of an elected president. It is not difficult to assume regarding formation of new body of the establishment which is responsible destabilizing democratic government. Moullana Fazal Reheman of JUI disclosed about meeting General Kiani with politicians in Dubai but no media anchor was interested to explore that more. It is fact that newly emerged middle class intellectuals are loyal with Pakistan as an Islamic state and they are in hurry to criticize president of Pakistan and popular party of Pakistan but actually they are criticizing the state of Pakistan and damaging its solidarity by invoking tension between freed and powerful judiciary and state of Pakistan.

    People of Pakistan have voted and authorized the elected people not only to govern Pakistan for five years but for powerful governance. Let us come out of a phobia that India, Israel and America will demise Pakistan if army will not be in power in Pakistan. Judiciary and Army personals are paid servants of state of Pakistan and constitution don’t allow them to govern country. Some prejudice pro-establishment media anchors are creating disharmony in politics of Pakistan. The media groups should decide limits and protocols.

  32. “دھماکے دھموکے ”

    یہ سارے سازشی لوگ ہمیشہ ایک دوسرے کو اجنٹ کہتے ہیں کیوں کے یہ خود کسی اجنڈے پر ہوتے ہیں اور سامنے والے کو بھی یہ سمجھتے ہیں ،سی ائی ے ہو یا آی ایس آی اصل میں یہ سب ابلیس کے اجنٹ ہیں اور ان سب کی ڈور اسی شیطان کے پاس ہے جس کا کام زمین پر خوں خرابہ کرنا اور مذہب کو بدنام کرنا ہے ،یہ سب پہلے کسی ایک کے دشمن ہوتے ہیں اور پھر آپس میں ایک دوسرے کو مارتے ہیں ،پہلے شیطان انہیں چالیں سکھاتا ہے پر یہی چالیں ان پر الٹ کر آتی ہیں ،زید حمد ،حامد میر ،حمید گل وغیرہ سب طالبان کی حمایتی اور ملا عمر کی حکومت چاہتے ہیں اور سارے دھماکوں اور لڑائی کی حمایت کرتے ہیں ،پر ایک دوسرے کو اجنٹ بھی کہتے ہیں ،مَثَلاً حمید گل طالبان کی حمایت بھی کرتا ہے اور یہ بھی کہتا ہے کے انڈیا ان کی مدت کر رہا ہے ،زید حامد ،حامد میر کو امریکا کا اجنٹ کہتا ہے ،اور حامد میر خالد خوجہ کو امریکا کا اجنٹ کہتا ہے ،اور حمید گل خالد خوجہ کو سچا مجاہد کہتا ہے ،اب حمید گل کیوں اپنے سچے مجاہد کے لیہ حامد میر کے خلاف نہیں بولتا ؟ اور اگر خالد خوجہ سے طالبان ناراض ہیں اور اس کو قتل کیا ہے اور لال مسجد میں خالد خوجہ نے دھوکہ دیا تھا تو کیوں لال مسجد والوں نے اور حمید گل نے ان کی نماز-ا- جنازہ لال مسجد میں پڑھی ؟ . پاکستانی فوج اپنے ایک ریٹایر افسر کے قتل پر خاموش کیوں ہے ؟

    اور اگر کوئی زید حامد ،حامد میر ،حمید گل ،خالد خوجہ ،حکیم اللہ محسود ،فضلاللہ،عمران خان ،منور حسن ،مسلم خان ،مست گل ،حکمت یار یا کسی خود کش دہماکے پر جانے والے سے پوچھیں تو سب ہی یہی کہیں گے کے وہ اسلام اور پاکستان ہی کے لیہ کام کر رہے ہیں پر آپس میں ایک دوسرے سے بھی دشمن ہیں .
    حامد میر خود تو مذہبی آدمی نہیں پر طالبان شیطانوں کی حمایت کرتا ہے ،یہ لوگ ووہی ہیں جن کے بارے میں حدیث کہا گیا تھا کے یہ لوگ اسلام اسلام کی رٹ لگائیں گے اور اسلام ان کے حلق سے نیچے نہیں اترے گا ،اور ان کے دل بھیڑیے جیسے ہونگے اور الله ان کو ایسے فتنوں میں ببتلا کرے گا کے عقل والوں کی عقل دنگ رہ جائے گی .

    یہ “دھماکے دھموکے ” کہنے والے لوگ جب الله کی پکڑ میں آئے گے تو پھر پتا چلے گا ، ان “دھماکے دھموکے ” سے ٹی وی پر مزے لینے والوں سے کوئی پوچھے کے اگر ان کا کوئی باپ ،بھائی ،ماں یا بہن شہید ہوں یا اپاہج ہو جائیں تو کیسا لگے گا ؟ ایک تو قتل اور فساد کرنا ،پھر ان کی حمایت کرنا اور اس کو اسلام کے نام پر کرنا الله کے عذاب کو دعوت دینا ہے

  33. http://www.jasarat.com/unicode/detail.php?category=8&coluid=2493
    See how Jamati News paper spreading hatred and they claim we are always “Peaceful ”
    کسی مسلمان کو امریکا کو خوش کرنے کے لیے قادیانیوں کی ہلاکتوں پر حد سے زیادہ افسوس کرنے کی کوئی ضرورت نہیں۔
    اس کی بیویوں کو امہات المومنین ‘ اپنے ساتھیوں کو صحابہ کہنا‘ قرآن کے لیے یہ کہنا کہ یہ دوبارہ مرزا قادیانی پر اترا ہے اور جو مرزا قادیانی کو نبی نہیں مانتا وہ مسلمان نہیں بلکہ رنڈیوں کی اولاد ہے یہ بات سپریم کورٹ نے بھی نقل کی ہے اورہمارے پاک صحابہ کی‘ خدا کی بدترین توہین کرنا کیا اس سے مسلمانوں کا طیش میںآنا ایک فطری عمل نہیں؟ ا

    ———–

    2010-06-03 00:00:00 PSTلاہوردھماکوں کے اسباب
    متفرق

    لاہور میں قادیانیوں کی دو عبادت گاہوں پر خودکش حملے اور بم دھماکے اور گولیوں کی بوچھاڑ ہوئی‘ جس پر دنیا ہل گئی‘ کافی سیاسی بیانات آئے ‘ حتیٰ کہ علماءکی جانب سے بھی ان حملوں کی سخت مذمت کی گئی‘ مجھے اس بات سے کوئی اختلاف نہیں کہ سیاسی لوگوں نے قادیانیوں سے ہمدردی کا اظہار کیا اس لیے کہ جو لوگ صبح ایک پارٹی اور شام دوسری پارٹی میں ہوں ان سے اس قسم کے بیانات اگرچہ ایمانی علامات کے منافی ہیں لیکن وہ دینے پر مجبور ہوتے ہیں۔ پوری دنیانے ان واقعات کی بھرپور اندازمیں مذمت کی شاید اتنی سخت مذمت عافیہ صدیقی کی گرفتاری‘ ایمل کانسی کی شہادت ‘ وانا میں امریکی حملوں پر بھی نہ کی گئی ہو۔ اس بات پر تو ہر ایک نے مذمت کردی لیکن ان حملوں کے اسباب پر کسی نے لب کشائی کی جرا_¿ت نہ کی مجھے افسوس اس کا ہی…. کیوں ہوئے حملی؟…. آخر اس ملک میں ہندو‘ عیسائی دیگر اقلیتیں بھی تو ہیں ان کی عبادت گاہوں پر کسی کی نظر کیوں نہیں جاتی؟ اور نہیں جائے گی کیوں؟ اس کے اسباب پر دو الفاظ تحریر کررہا ہوں…. اس بات سے کوئی مسلمان اختلاف نہیں کرسکتا کہ قادیانی ایک بدترین گستاخ رسول قوم ہی…. جس نے نہ صرف رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم کی بلکہ باری تعالیٰ…. صحابہ…. قرآن…. ازواج مطہرات سے لے کر ایک ایک مسلمان کی توہین کی ہے۔قادیانی مسلمان نہ ہوتے ہوئے خود کو مسلمان کہلوائی…. اسلام پر نہ ہوتے ہوئی خود کو اسلام کا پیروکار کہلوائی…. ایک مسلمان کو اس کے نبی حضرت محمد سے بڑھ کر کوئی چیز عزیز نہیں ہوسکتی اس بات کا ثبوت قرآن میں بھی ہے اور کئی ایک احادیث میں اس کا ثبوت ملتا ہے اگر تمہیں محمد اپنی جانوں سے زیادہ عزیز نہیں تو تم کامل الایمان نہیں ہو۔ ظاہر ہے کہ اگر کوئی شخص مجھے آکر کہے خہ مولانا محمود الحسین آپ کا باپ نہیں بلکہ میں ہوں‘ اب دو باتیں ہیں ایک تو میں خود طیش میں آجاﺅں گا لیکن اگر میں صبر کالوں تو دنیا مجھے غیرت مند کہنے کو تیار نہ ہوگی۔ ٹھیک یہی اختلاف ہمارا قادیانیوں کے ساتھ ہے وہ مرز ا غلام احمد قادیانی کو نہ صرف نبی کہہ کر مانتے ہیں بلکہ ان کا عقیدہ ہے کہ محمد رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم کی دوبعثتیں ہیں ایک مکہ میں اور دوسری مرزا قادیانی کی شکل میں قادیان میں اور پہلی بعثت سے بڑھ کر قادیان والی بعث ہی…. اب میں اپنی بات کو اختتام پر رکھ کر آپ کے سامنے سپریم کورٹ آف پاکستان کے فیصلے کے چند اقتباسات پیش کرتا ہوں جو اس نے اپنے تاریخ ساز فیصلے میں لکھے ہیں…. اور یہ ایک اٹل حقیقت ہے عدالت فیصلہ غلط دے یہ تو ممکن ہی…. لیکن حوالہ غلط چاہ کر بھی نہیں لکھ سکتی کہ مخالف گروپ سامنے ہے۔1993 ءمیں جسٹس شفیع الرحمن کی سربراہی میں عزت مآب جسٹس جناب عبدالقدیر چوہدری ‘ جسٹس محمد افضل لون‘ جسٹس سلیم اختر‘ جسٹس ولی محمد خان صاحبان پر مشتمل فل بینچ نے قادیانیوں کے اعتراضات کہ ہمیں مذہبی آزادی ہونی چاہیے‘ مسلمان کہلوانی….مساجد بنانی…. اذان کہنی…. کلمہ لکھنے وغیرہ کی اجازت ہونی چاہیے پر ہمارے مذکورہ جج صاحبان نے حق و صداقت کا فیصلہ قادیانیوں کے حوالے نقل کرکے دیا ہے۔تاقیامت ان سیاسی راہنماﺅں کی آنکھیں کھولنے کے لیے کافی ہے جو اپنی آنکھیں بند کرکے قادیانیوں کو مظلوم ثابت کرنے پر تلے ہوئے ہیں اور ان کی موت پر ایسا غم کرتے ہیں جیسا کہ شاید کبھی کسی مسلمان عالم دین کی شہادت پربھی نہ کیا ہو…. چنانچہ جج صاحبان نے اپنے اس تاریخ ساز فیصلے میں لکھا ہے کہ …. قادیانی عقیدہ ہے کہ ”میں وہ آئینہ ہوں جس میں محمد کی ذات کا عکس جھلکتا ہے“ بحوالہ نزول المسیح ص 48 …. میں اس محمد کی تکمیل ہوں یعنی محمد کاظل ہوں دیکھیے حقیقت الوحی ص72 …. میں ہی آخری نبی ہوں…. اور خدا نے براہین احمدیہ میں میرا نام محمد اور احمد رکھا اور مجھے محمد کی تجسیم بنایا دیکھیے ایک غلطی کا ازالہ ص 11 ۔سپریم کورٹ کے اس حوالے سے ریمارکس ہیں کہ اوپر جو کچھ کہا گیا اس کی روشنی میں اس بات پر عمومی اتفاق رائے پایا جاتا ہے کہ جب کوئی احمدی کلمہ پڑھتا ہے یا اس کا اظہار کرتا ہے تو وہ اس بات کا اعلان کرتا ہے کہ مرزا غلام احمد قادیانی ایسا نبی ہے جس کی اطاعت واجب ہے اور جو ایسا نہیں کرتا وہ بے دین ہے بصورت دیگر وہ خود کو مسلمان ظاہر کرکے دھوکا دیتے ہیں…. یہ جرم ہی…. معزز جج صاحبان نے پیرا نمبر 85 میں لکھا ہے کہ مرزا غلام احمد قادیانی نے نہ صرف یہ کہ اپنی تحریروں میں رسول اکرم کی عظمت و شان کو گھٹانے کی کوشش کی ہے بلکہ بعض مقامات پر ان کا مذاق بھی اڑایا ہے مثلاً مرزا قادیانی اپنی کتاب روحانی خزائن کے ص 263 ج 17 پر رقمطراز ہے کہ ”پیغمبراسلام اشاعت دین کو مکمل نہ کرسکے میں نے اس کی تکمیل کی“ ایک اور کتاب میں لکھا ہے کہ رسول اکرم بعض نازل شدہ پیغامات کو سمجھ نہ سکے اور ان سے بہت غلطیاں سرزد ہوئیں دیکھیے ازالہ اوہام ص 346 …. رسول اکرم تین ہزار معجزے رکھتے تھی…. جبکہ میرے پاس دس لاکھ نشانیاں ہیں…. رسول اکرم نصاریٰ کا تیار کردہ پنیر کھاتے تھے جس میں وہ سور کی چربی ملاتے تھی…. ان تمام کا حوالہ معزز عدالت نے اپنے فیصلہ میں دیا ہے طوالت کی وجہ سے چھوڑتا ہوں…. اب اندازہ کریں کہ توہین سے زیادہ ہوتا ہے مذاق اڑانا…. توہین کوئی برداشت نہیں کرسکتا‘ اپنے نبی کا مذاق کون برداشت کرسکے گا۔ اور یہ نہیں کہ قادیانی جماعت کا ان پر ایمان نہ ہو اس لیے کہ قادیانیت میں شامل ہونے کے لیے جو فارم مہیا کیا جاتا ہے اس کے الفاظ لاہور ہائی کورٹ نے اپنے تاریخ ساز فیصلے میں نقل کیے ہیں ”میں مرزا غلام احمد قادیانی کے تمام دعاوی پر ایمان لاتا۔ لاتی ہوں“ اور یہ تمام کتب ابھی پاکستان میں چھپ کر تقسیم ہورہی ہیں اور قادیانی اپنے گماشتوں کو یہ کتب دے کر اس کے مطالعے کو یقینی بنانے کا کہتے ہیں…. یہ تمام دلخراش کفر یہ عبارتیں لکھ کر سپریم کورٹ نے جو ریمارکس دیے ہیں وہ سونے کے قلم سے لکھنے کے مترادف ہیں اور لاہور جیسے واقعات کو ان ریمارکس کے پس منظر میں دیکھا جائے تو حقیقت کھل جائے گی کہ یہ واقعات کیوں ہوتے ہیں اور کیا آئندہ بھی ہوں گی؟ چنانچہ معزز عدالت نے لکھا ہے کہ ”کیا ایسی صورت میں کوئی کسی مسلمان کو مورد الزام ٹھہرا سکتا ہے اگر وہ ایسا توہین آمیز مواد جیسا کہ مرزا صاحب نے تخلیق کیا ہے سننی…. پڑھنی…. یا دیکھنے کے بعد اپنے آپ پر قابو نہ رکھ سکے ؟“ اب آپ دیکھیں کہ کس نے حملہ کیا‘ ان کا کیا مقصد تھا‘ کون تھی….؟ قطع نظر اس کے کہ قادیانی پاکستان کے شہری ہیں پہلے وہ خودکو شہری ماننے پر تیار تو ہوں…. قادیانی عقیدہ ہے کہ پاکستان خدا کی مرضی کے خلاف بنا ہے یہ ایک دن ضرور اکھنڈ بھارت بنے گا…. یہ بات کس سے مخفی ہے کہ پاکستان کے پہلے وزیر خارجہ سر ظفر اللہ قادیانی نے بانی پاکستان محمد علی جناح کا جنازہ یہ کہہ کر پڑھنے سے انکار کردیا کہ اسے اسلامی حکومت کا کافر وزیر یا کافر حکومت کا اسلامی وزیر سمجھیں…. اور یہ بات کس سے مخفی ہے کہ پاکستان کے ایٹمی راز بھارت اور اسرائیل تک پہنچانے میں عبدالسلام قادیانی نے کیا کردار ادا کیا…. ان تمام باتوں سے ہٹ کر یہ ملک کلمہ اور اسلام کی سربلندی کے لیے حاصل کیا گیا اور اسلام کی اساس ہے ختم نبوت‘ تو جس قوم کا اس اساس پر یقین نہ ہو وہ کیوں کر اس ملک و قوم کی وفادارہوگی؟ مجھے بے حد افسوس ہوا ان پر جو قادیانیوں کی ہلاکتوں پر آنسو بہا بیٹھے اور اپنی مسند بھلا بیٹھے۔کیا انہیں اس شرعی مسئلہ کا علم نہیں کہ رسول اللہ کے گستاخ کی توبہ بھی قبول نہیں اسے بہرصورت قتل کیا جائے گا۔ ہاں فرق فقط اتناہے کہ اسلامی حدود کا نفاذ اسلامی حکومت کے ذمہ ہے ہر شخص نافذ نہیں کرسکتا۔ اگر یہ اسلامی حد کہ جو شخص رسول اللہ کی توہین کرے گا اس کو قتل کیا جائے نافذ العمل ہوتی تو نہ تو کوئی رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم کی توہین کرنے کی جسارت کرتا اور نہ ہی لاہور جیسے واقعات رونما ہوتے۔اب ایک سپریم کورٹ کا اسی حوالے سے کہ یہ واقعات کیوں رونما ہوتے ہیں ایک اور پیرا لکھ کر بات کو سمیٹتا ہوں۔اس لیے اگر کسی احمدی کو انتظامیہ کی طرف سے یا قانوناً شعائر اسلام کا اعلانیہ اظہار کرنے یا انہیں پڑھنے کی اجازت دے دی جائے تو یہ اقدام اس کی شکل میں ایک اور رشدی تخلیق کرنے کے مترادف ہوگا کیا اس صورت میں انتظامیہ اس کی جان مال اور آزادی کے تحفظ کی ضمانت دے سکتی ہی؟ اگر دے سکتی ہے تو کس قیمت پر؟ مزید برآں اگر گلیوں میں یا جائے عام پر جلوس نکالنے یا جلسہ کرنے کی اجازت دی جائے تو یہ خانہ جنگی کی اجازت دینے کے برابر ہے‘ یہ محض قیاس آرائی نہیں حقیقتاً ماضی میں بارہا ایسا ہوچکا ہے اور بھاری جانی و مالی نقصان کے بعد اس پر قابو پایا گیا (تفصیلات کے لیے منیر رپورٹ دیکھی جاسکتی ہی) ردعمل یہ ہوتا ہے کہ جب کوئی احمدی یا قادیانی سرعام کسی پلے کارڈ‘ بیج ‘ یا پوسٹر پر کلمہ کی نمائش کرتا ہے‘ یا دیوار یا نمائشی دروازوں ‘ یا جھنڈیوں پر لکھتا‘ یا دوسرے شعائر اسلامی کا استعمال کرتا یا انہیں پڑھتا ہے تو یہ اعلانیہ رسول کریم کے نام نامی کی بے حرمتی اور دوسرے انبیاءکرام کے اسمائے گرامی کی توہین کے ساتھ ساتھ مرزا کا مرتبہ اونچا کرنے کے مترادف ہے جس سے مسلمانوں کا طیش میں آنا ایک فطری بات ہے اور یہ چیز امن عامہ کو خراب کرنے کا موجب بن سکتی ہے‘ جس کے نتیجے میں جان و مال کا نقصان ہوسکتا ہے‘ ایسی صورت میں احتیاطی تدابیر بروئے کار لانا لازمی ہے تاکہ امن و امان برقرار رکھا جاسکے اور جان و مال خصوصاً احمدیوں کے نقصان سے بچا جاسکی…. ہم یہ بھی نہیں سمجھتے کہ احمدیوں کو اپنی شخصیات‘ مقامات اورمعمولات کے لیے نئے خطاب ‘ القاب یا نام وضع کرنے میں دشواری کا سامنا کرنا پڑے گا‘ آخر ہندوﺅں‘ عیسائیوں ‘ سکھوں اور دیگر برادریوں نے بھی تو اپنے تہوار ‘ القابات جدا بنا رکھے ہیں نا! وغیرہ۔اب ان ریمارکس کو پڑھ کر پھر قادیانیوں کی جانب سے اشتعال انگیزیاں مثلاً اپنی عبادت گاہوں میں اذانیں دینا‘ کلمہ لکھنا‘ خود کو مسلمان اور مرزا قادیانی کو محمد رسول اللہ ہی نہیں اس سے بڑھ کر ماننا…. اس کی بیویوں کو امہات المومنین ‘ اپنے ساتھیوں کو صحابہ کہنا‘ قرآن کے لیے یہ کہنا کہ یہ دوبارہ مرزا قادیانی پر اترا ہے اور جو مرزا قادیانی کو نبی نہیں مانتا وہ مسلمان نہیں بلکہ رنڈیوں کی اولاد ہے یہ بات سپریم کورٹ نے بھی نقل کی ہے اورہمارے پاک صحابہ کی‘ خدا کی بدترین توہین کرنا کیا اس سے مسلمانوں کا طیش میںآنا ایک فطری عمل نہیں؟ اس سوال پر حکومت سنجیدگی سے غور کری…. قادیانیوں کو اسلامی شعائر استعمال کرنے سے روکے جیسا کہ سپریم کورٹ نے لکھا ہے ۔ اذان دینے اور اپنی عبادت گاہیں مساجد کے طرز پر بنانے اور ان پر کلمہ لکھنے‘ خود کو مسلمان اور مسلمانوں کو کافر مرتد‘ رنڈیوں کی اولاد کہنے سے انہیں روکے‘ سب سے بڑی بات کہ قادیانیوں کو حکومت پابند بنائے کہ وہ خود کو کم از کم غیرمسلم اقلیت تسلیم کرلیں اور مسلمانوں کی اسلامی اصطلاحات کو استعمال نہ کریں۔ بصورت دیگر اعلیٰ عدالتوں کی جانب سے مقرر کردہ سزائیں نافذ کرے۔اگر ان باتوں پر قادیانی عمل پیرا ہوجائیں یا حکومت انہیں پابند بنادے تو میں سمجھتا ہوں کہ لاہور جیسے واقعات رونما نہ ہوں گے آخر عیسائی‘ یہودی‘ سکھ‘ ہندو دیگر اقلیتیں بھی تو پاکستان میں رہ رہی ہیں وہ ہمارے مذہب سے چھیڑ چھاڑ نہیں کرتیں ان کے ساتھ کبھی ایسا کوئی واقعہ ہوا ہی؟ اور جب قادیانی گروہ کی جانب سے اشتعال انگیز کارروائیاں ہوتی رہیں تو بقول سپریم کورٹ کے کہ اس پر ردعمل ایک فطری چیز ہے۔امید ہے کہ حکومت میری معروضات پر سنجیدگی سے غور کرکے کوئی راستہ امن عامہ کے لیے تلاش کرے گی اور کسی مسلمان کو امریکا کو خوش کرنے کے لیے قادیانیوں کی ہلاکتوں پر حد سے زیادہ افسوس کرنے کی کوئی ضرورت نہیں۔ یہ ہمارے پاک نبی اور ملک و ملت کے غدار ہیں۔ اگرچہ ان کے قتل میں میری جماعت کا موقف یہ ہی ہے کہ یہ ملکی فضا کو خراب کرنے اور توہین رسالت کے قانون میں اکھاڑ پچھاڑ کی ایک گھناﺅنی سازش ہے تو اسے بھی نظر انداز نہیں کیا جاسکتا۔ اگرچہ وہ جان بوجھ کر مسلمانوں کو مشتعل کرتے ہیں کہ وہ ایسی کارروائیاں کریں اور ہم دنیا میں مظلوم بن کر ابھریں تو ان کے اس منصوبے پر بھی ہم نظر رکھے ہوئے ہیں۔ ایسا نہیں ہونے دیا جائے گا اور اگرخدانخواستہ ایسا ہوا بھی کہ ان میں سے متعلق بنائی گئی ترامیم میں چھیڑ چھاڑ کی گئی تو اس کا ردعمل بھی اچھا نہ ہوگا۔ اس لیے ہر قدم حکومت کو انتہائی سوچ سمجھ کر اٹھانا ہوگا۔

    ————————

  34. A Cyber “Mujahid ” threatening and using abusive language on Calling Qadiyani Mosque a “Mosque ”
    Source
    http://pkpolitics.com/discuss/topic/funny-email-rated-r

    From: brotherb77@gmail.com
    Subject: your TOPIC “62 Killed in Lahore Mosque Attacks ”
    Date: 4 June 2010 12:16:49 BST
    To: admin@pkpolitics.com

    بہن کے لوڑے
    کیا تو خود قادیانی بہن چو ہے؟
    ان کے کوڑے خانے اور ٹٹی خانے کو مسجد کہتے تیرے جیسے حرامی کو شرم نہیں آتی؟

    یاد رہے
    اگر مرزا ہوتا خدا کا نبی
    تو ٹٹی میں گر کر نہ مرتا کبھی

    یہ پاکستانی قانون کے بھی خلاف ہے کہ ان کے ٹٹی خانوں کو مسجد کہا جائے۔
    حرامی ۔۔۔۔اگر تیرے اندر ذرا بھی شرم ہے اور تو مسلمان ہے اور نبی اکرم ﷺ کی ختم نبوت پر یقین رکھتا ہے تو ٹاپک کی ہیڈینگ چیج کر۔
    ورنہ تیرے سے زیادہ نسلی بہن چو دنیا میں نہیں ہو گا۔ اور تجھے انشااللہ تعالی مرزا غلام احمد کی طرح کتے کی موت نصیب ہو گی۔ آمین “

  35. جرنل صاحب اور ان کا اعتماد

    پاکستان کے لوگوں کی سوچ کو جنگجوانہ بنانے میں ویسے تو بہت سوں کا ہاتھ ہے ،پر عام لوگوں کو برین واش کرنے میں فوجیوں کا بہت برا ہاتھ ہے ، یہ میں میڈیا پر انے والے فوجیوں کی بات نہیں کر رہا بلکے ہر جوان اور رنگروٹ ،جرنل اور کپتان کی بات کر رہا ہوں جس کو اچھا خاصا برین واش کیا جاتا ہے اور وہ عوام میں ایسا پروپگنڈہ کرتا ہے کے ایسا لگتا ہے جیسے ساری اندر کی باتیں اسے ہی پتا ہیں اور باقی عوام بیوقوف ہے ،یہ جو فوجی صاحب یا ان سے مطالق لوگ ہوتے ہیں وہ کسی بھی موضوع پر اتنے اعتماد سے بولتے ہیں چاہے وہ جھوٹ ہی کیوں نہ ہو وہ سچ لگنے لگتا ہے .ایسے سوچ پورے پاکستان میں پر بل خصوص پنجاب میں بوہت پی جاتی ہے ،ہر فوجی پہلے طالبان کو اپنا کہتا تھا پھر جب گردانیں کتنے لگے تو انڈیا کا اجنٹ بنا دیا ،ویسے یہ فوجی صاحب سارے مسلوں کو ایسے ہی انڈیا سے جوڑتے ہیں جیسے جماعت اسلامی امریکا سے .ان سب فوجیوں کا سیاست میں استمال ہونا ان کو ہر حکومت کا مخالف بھی بنا دیتا ہے ہر ایک کے بارے میں ان کا ایک خاص زاویہ ہوتا ہے چاہے اس میں کوئی سچائی ہو یا نہ ہو ،پر اس اعتماد سے بولتے ہیں کے دوسرا متاثر ہو ہی جاتا ہے .جب اپ کوئی ایسی بات کریں جو ان کی محدود سوچ سے ٹکراتی ہو تو وہ مسکراتے ہیں اور کہتے یہ کے “تم نے جانتے ” مطلب کے یو آر بلڈی سویلین پر شاید انھیں بعد میں پتا چلتا ہو کہ وہ کس خام خیالی میں زندہ تھے .یہ بھرم رکھنے کی کوشش کرتے ہیں کے انھیں سب پتا ہے اور سب ان کے کنٹرول میں ہے اور وقت بتاتا ہے کے وہ کتنے بیوقوف ثابت ہوئے .

  36. http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/urdu/2010/06/post_634.html

    << پچھلا بلاگ | بلاگز
    'شناخت کا ناچ'

    اصناف: بحث, پاکستان

    ہارون رشید | 2010-06-09 ،11:31

    میرے پاس اسلام آباد کے بیالیس سال پرانے رہائشی کریم یوسف آئے ہیں۔ ان کا مسئلہ کافی توجہ طلب ہے۔ انہیں ہر پانچ سال بعد اپنے پاکستانی ہونے کا ثبوت دینا پڑتا ہے۔

    اس کی وجہ نیا کمپیوٹرائزڈ شناختی کارڈ ہے جس کی اب ہر پانچ برس بعد ہر پاکستانی کو تجدید کروانی ہوتی ہے۔ ہر مرتبہ اندراج کا ادارہ نادرا بقول ان کے ان سے 'بھونڈے سوالات' پوچھتا ہے۔ ان کا کہنا ہے کہ نادرا کی زبان میں وہ ایس آئی ہیں یعنی 'سسٹم انڈیپینڈینٹ'۔ انہیں اکثر نادرا کے چکروں کے دوران یہ الفاظ سننے کو ملے لیکن اب معلوم ہوا کہ اس کا آخر مطلب کیا ہے۔

    ایس آئی کا مطلب ہے کہ اس شخص کا کسی دوسرے پاکستانی شہری کے ساتھ تعلق نہیں بن رہا ہے۔ ان کے پاس ان کے والد کا ہاتھ سے لکھا جانے والا پرانا شناختی کارڈ تو ہے لیکن ان کی قیام نادرا کے کافی پہلے رحلت ہوگئی تھی۔ وہ کمپیوٹر کارڈ سے مستفید نہیں ہوسکے۔ والدہ غیر ملکی ہیں لہذا انہیں کبھی اس پاکستانی دستاویز کی ضرورت محسوس نہیں ہوئی۔ ایک بھائی ہیں جو کمپیوٹر کارڈ کے آنے سے قبل ہی آسٹریلیا جا بسے۔

    تو وہ اب اپنا تعلق کسی سے کیسے ثابت کرسکیں گے؟ لیکن دلچسپ بات یہ ہے کہ وہ اب تک سات پاکستانی پاسپورٹ حاصل کر چکے ہیں۔ ان کے حصول میں انہیں کبھی کوئی بڑا مسئلہ نہیں ہوا۔ پرانا دیکھایا، نیا لے لیا۔ لیکن شناختی کارڈ ان کے لیے غیرضروری درد سر بن گیا ہے۔ بات یہاں ختم نہیں ہوتی۔ انہیں ایک اور مشکل اپنے پرانے بینک اکاونٹ بند کروانے میں پیش آ رہی ہے۔ بینک والوں کا کہنا ہے کہ نادرا کے پاس جاکر پہلے اپنے کوائف درست کروائیں تو تب ہی بند ہوگا۔ وہ گزشتہ ایک ماہ سے نادرا اور بینک کے درمیان کسی فلمی نادرا کی طرح ناچ رہے ہیں۔ ایسے کا کیا ہو؟

  37. ISI sponsored Jalsa in Lahore

    http://express.com.pk/epaper/PoPupwindow.aspx?newsID=1100968684&Issue=NP_KHI&Date=20100614

    http://express.com.pk/epaper/PoPupwindow.aspx?newsID=1100968685&Issue=NP_KHI&Date=20100614

    I think Hameed Gul left Deobandi Taliban ,now he is with Wahabi Lashker .

    Hameed Gul’s Mujahid Friend Khalid Khawja was also a CIA agent accrding to Pujabi Taliban host Hamid mir 🙂 .
    Hameed gul is not supporting his institution he is supporting enemies of Pakistan Army .

  38. dharty ma ka garoor bb shaheed
    irfan urfi
    wo gareboo ki umang umeed aas the,mazlomo ka saroor the ,wo aamriat kay manbaey taqat kay maqabil muzahemat ki tehreek the -bade saba the mohabbat ki devi the ya devi of democracy the ismay itna saber zabt berdasht tahul mizaji burdbary the wo faham o frasat aur danish o benish say bhrpoor the -wo mashriq mai the magrib mai bhe the saray aalam mai aman ki kushbo the siasat kay ufaq ka taj fikr o aaghy ka humala mohabbat he mohabbar sarapa piar the the qalander the ya qalanderana mizaj rakhty the wo aalim bhe the aalimoo ka ahtram bhe karti then menarae shaour the-
    dhrty maa ka garoor the wo zulfi ki pinki the,fatima ki vudi bua the-bilwal bakhtwar asifa ki mumi jan the -nusrat ki talwar the murtaza bhutto shaheed aur shahnawaz shaeed ka maan the .sussi bhutto ki aani ,asif ali zardari ki shareke hayat the ,ya sab tu the mager in sab say badh ker wo siasat ki rooh the !!gareboo kay lyae kushali ka pegham the ,wo bag o bahar shakhsiat zeruk hama jehat wa hamager shakhsiat the. wo bolty the tu phool khiltay thay uskay lulkarnay say aamriat kay but larez jatay they ,jamia kalam o kamalt the,nider the,tarekh ka roshan bab ha !!wo dunya ki siasat ko nikharna sanwarna janty the !chahty the !mager uskay bandhe hovay they zalimoo nay . shaheed shahzadi the ya shaheed e jamhoriay the jo zinda benazir the murnay kay baad bhe benazir the wo non stop total democracy ki bat karte they .shaheed baba ki shaheed beti the wo azemat ki rah ki shahsawar the .wo shahedoo ,qalndroo,hurriat pasandoo ki rahpe gamzen ! classic siasat ka azeem shahkar the wo popular siasat ki trend setter the is mai munfrid aur numaya muqam rakhty the wo social democrat the aur pakistan ki image building bhi isy tur karna chahty then -wo subhe noor ki pheli roshan kiran ban ker siasat mai warid hueyn .aur shauor o aaghye ban ker saray alam mai cha gyen ,wo amne alam k ay lye sargrame amal the, isnay siasat mai rawadary kay culture ki perwarish o nighedasht ,terbiat o rehnumai kartay huey jame shahdat nosha kia -wo awam ki khidmat per mamor iqtadar perasto kay propaganga ka shikar dyare gher mai apni dharty say door taqat ka sarcashma awam say hazaroo maeel door mahea bay aab ki trah tarapty rahy .mager zalimo nay issay aik tawel arsay tak jila watan rakha shoher ko sakht qeed ki saobatayn uthanai padhaen ,shoherki terbiat e khas kertay huay asia ka nelsen mandela bana dya .wo bhutto kay kauy pegham ki piyamber ban kay aagay he aagay badhtay chlay gye .serat o surat mai noori the .is ghata toup andheray mai menare a noor the !dunya mai miyana ravy aitidal pasandi ka fikry shaour ujager karnay mai apni misal aap the .wo baserat afroz alami aman ki alamberdar dunya ki mazlom tareen aurat the.wo mashray kay oppressed awam ki umang justojo the .tehzeb o tamadun ki pehchan the .insani haqooq kay idaroo kay lye mashal e rah the milat ki aaan ban jan the kahen azemushan the tu kahen alishan the .azemulmurtabat khuda ki shan the .guftar mai aik alag maqam aur blund kirdar rakhty the.wo aala zerf kuch ker dekhanay ki tamna lye bechain be qarar the .wo iqbal ka shaheen the tu quad e azam kay khwabo ki tabeer the .madre milat ki taswer the quad e awam ka vaqar the .wo wafaq ki alamat the.jamhoriat ka rosahn chiragh the .aisa lagta ha k wo parestan say aaye huy pary the .shahdat kay martabay per faiez ho ker horoon ki shahzadi bun gye .wo shahadatoo ki dastano ko azem say azem ter kartay huey qafla e jamhoriat ko surkhro kargye .aur ya narae mastana laga gye kay shaheed ki jo mot ha wo quom ki hyat ha .issy lye qaflae jamhoriat ka her sipahi yahe narae mastana lagata ha kay zinda ha bb zinda ha !!zinda ha bb zinda ha tum kitnay bhutto maro gay her ghar say bhutto niklay ga

  39. dharty ma ka garoor bb shaheed
    irfan urfi
    wo gareboo ki umang umeed aas the,mazlomo ka saroor the ,wo aamriat kay manbaey taqat kay maqabil muzahemat ki tehreek the -bade saba the mohabbat ki devi the ya devi of democracy the ismay itna saber zabt berdasht tahul mizaji burdbary the wo faham o frasat aur danish o benish say bhrpoor the -wo mashriq mai the magrib mai bhe the saray aalam mai aman ki kushbo the siasat kay ufaq ka taj fikr o aaghy ka humala mohabbat he mohabbar sarapa piar the the qalander the ya qalanderana mizaj rakhty the wo aalim bhe the aalimoo ka ahtram bhe karti then menarae shaour the-
    dhrty maa ka garoor the wo zulfi ki pinki the,fatima ki vudi bua the-bilwal bakhtwar asifa ki mumi jan the -nusrat ki talwar the murtaza bhutto shaheed aur shahnawaz shaeed ka maan the .sussi bhutto ki aani ,asif ali zardari ki shareke hayat the ,ya sab tu the mager in sab say badh ker wo siasat ki rooh the !!gareboo kay lyae kushali ka pegham the ,wo bag o bahar shakhsiat zeruk hama jehat wa hamager shakhsiat the. wo bolty the tu phool khiltay thay uskay lulkarnay say aamriat kay but larez jatay they ,jamia kalam o kamalt the,nider the,tarekh ka roshan bab ha !!wo dunya ki siasat ko nikharna sanwarna janty the !chahty the !mager uskay bandhe hovay they zalimoo nay . shaheed shahzadi the ya shaheed e jamhoriay the jo zinda benazir the murnay kay baad bhe benazir the wo non stop total democracy ki bat karte they .shaheed baba ki shaheed beti the wo azemat ki rah ki shahsawar the .wo shahedoo ,qalndroo,hurriat pasandoo ki rahpe gamzen ! classic siasat ka azeem shahkar the wo popular siasat ki trend setter the is mai munfrid aur numaya muqam rakhty the wo social democrat the aur pakistan ki image building bhi isy tur karna chahty then -wo subhe noor ki pheli roshan kiran ban ker siasat mai warid hueyn .aur shauor o aaghye ban ker saray alam mai cha gyen ,wo amne alam k ay lye sargrame amal the, isnay siasat mai rawadary kay culture ki perwarish o nighedasht ,terbiat o rehnumai kartay huey jame shahdat nosha kia -wo awam ki khidmat per mamor iqtadar perasto kay propaganga ka shikar dyare gher mai apni dharty say door taqat ka sarcashma awam say hazaroo maeel door mahea bay aab ki trah tarapty rahy .mager zalimo nay issay aik tawel arsay tak jila watan rakha shoher ko sakht qeed ki saobatayn uthanai padhaen ,shoherki terbiat e khas kertay huay asia ka nelsen mandela bana dya .wo bhutto kay kauy pegham ki piyamber ban kay aagay he aagay badhtay chlay gye .serat o surat mai noori the .is ghata toup andheray mai menare a noor the !dunya mai miyana ravy aitidal pasandi ka fikry shaour ujager karnay mai apni misal aap the .wo baserat afroz alami aman ki alamberdar dunya ki mazlom tareen aurat the.wo mashray kay oppressed awam ki umang justojo the .tehzeb o tamadun ki pehchan the .insani haqooq kay idaroo kay lye mashal e rah the milat ki aaan ban jan the kahen azemushan the tu kahen alishan the .azemulmurtabat khuda ki shan the .guftar mai aik alag maqam aur blund kirdar rakhty the.wo aala zerf kuch ker dekhanay ki tamna lye bechain be qarar the .wo iqbal ka shaheen the tu quad e azam kay khwabo ki tabeer the .madre milat ki taswer the quad e awam ka vaqar the .wo wafaq ki alamat the.jamhoriat ka rosahn chiragh the .aisa lagta ha k wo parestan say aaye huy pary the .shahdat kay martabay per faiez ho ker horoon ki shahzadi bun gye .wo shahadatoo ki dastano ko azem say azem ter kartay huey qafla e jamhoriat ko surkhro kargye .aur ya narae mastana laga gye kay shaheed ki jo mot ha wo quom ki hyat ha .issy lye qaflae jamhoriat ka her sipahi yahe narae mastana lagata ha kay zinda ha bb zinda ha !!zinda ha bb zinda ha tum kitnay bhutto maro gay her ghar say bhutto niklay ga

  40. مذہب جن کا پیشہ ہے

    مسلہ سارا یہ ہے کہ مولویوں نے حقوق کی جنگ کو اسلام کی جنگ بنادیا ،اور حکومت کرنا جو ایک اتظامی معملا ہے ،اسے بھی اسلامی بنا دیا .امریکا سے لڑائی چین کی بھی ہے اور روس کی بھی پر ان کی لڑائی خالص دنیا کے لیہ ہے اسی طرح امریکا کا جھگڑا نہ مسلم کا ہے نہ کافر کا اس کی اچھی بری پالیسی اس کے اپنے مفاد کے لیہ ہے اور ہمارے ملا کو اپنا دین خطرے میں نظر آتا ہے – اگر کسی ہندو اور مسلمان میں کسی کاروبار میں جھگڑا ہو جائے تو کیا یہ اسلام اور کفر کی جنگ ہوگی ؟ یہی جھگڑا کشمیر میں ہے اور جھگڑے کی بنیاد حقوق ہیں نہ کے مذہب پر یہ مذہبی انتہا پسندوں نے اپنی دکان چمکانے کے لیہ مذہب کا سہارا لیتے ہیں –

    مسلہ مذہب سے نہیں اس کو پیشہ بنانے والوں کا ہے ،حدیثوں میں ہے کے قیامت سے قریب لوگ دین کو پیشہ بنائیں گے ،پر یہ بات کوئی مولوی نہیں کرتا ہے ،قاری ،امام ،جہادی ،مدرسے کا مھتمد سب کے سب ایک پیشے کے طور پر کیہ جاتے ہیں ،پھر یہی لوگ چاہتے ہیں کے ان کو حکومت بھی دی جائے یہ صرف مال اور جاہ کی محبت ہے اور دین کا سہارا ہے
    مذہب ان کا پیشہ ہے ،
    یہ قرآن پڑھتے ہیں اور حفظ کرتے ہیں کے وہ قرآن پڑھا کر پیسے کمائیں ،
    یہ مدرسے جاتے ہیں اس لیہ کے ایک دن ان کو امام کی نوکری ملے گی اور دو وقت کا کھانا اور غیر مفت ملے گا
    یا صرف اذان دینے پر آدھی تنخوا ملے گی
    اگر مفی بن گئے تو اور مزے
    اگر یہ بھی نہیں ہو سکے تو ایک مدرسہ کھول لیں اور چندے کے نام پر اپنے گھر کا خرچ چلائیں
    اگر کچھ بھی نہیں اتا تو مذہبی سیاسی جماعت میں چلے جائیں کیوں کے اس میں نام بھی ہے اور “اسلامی حکومت ” انے پر وزیر بننے کے چانس بھی
    پر سب سے زیادہ ٹیکا اور مال تو جہادی بننے میں ہے آگے پیچھے لوگ ،اسلحے کا انبار ،فوجیوں سے تعلق ،دین بھی دنیا بھی ….

    پر یہ سے کیسے ہوگا ،یہ دکان کیسے چلتی رہے گی ؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟

    یہ پیشاور مولوی اندر سے کھوکھلے ہیں ،ان کے پاس لوگوں کو دینے کے لیہ کچھ نہیں ،یہ مثبت باتیں کیوں نہیں پھیلاتے ؟ یہ ایمان ،اخلاق ،محبت ،رواداری ،حسن سلوک ،امن ،ایک دوسرے کی عزت اور مدد کی ترغیب کیوں نہیں دیتے ؟
    کیوں کے یہ پیشہ ور مولوی جانتے ہیں کے ان کے پاس کوئی ایسی مثبت باتیں نے جو دوسرے کو متاثر کر سکیں اور نہ ہی ان باتوں سے ان کی روزگار چلے گا اور نہ ہی ان کی دکان چمکے گی
    ان کی دکان ،روزگار اور کاروبار صرف اور صرف ایک چیز سے چل رہا ہے وہ ہے “نفرت ” ،
    نفرت ،
    یہی ہے ان کی اصل بقا
    نفرت پر لوگوں کو جمع کرنا اور نفرت کی بنیاد پر اپنی دکان چمکانا اور مشھور ہونا ان کا پیشہ ہے
    انڈیا کی نفرت ،شیع سے نفرت ،سنی سے نفرت ،امریکا سے نفرت ،بریلوی مخالفت ،فقہ مخالفت ،پریلوی کی بنیاد دیوبندی سے نفرت ،دیوبندی مولوی کی بنیاد بریلوی اور شیوں سے نفرت ،اہلحدیث کی ساری تقریروں میں حنفیوں کی مذمّت ،شیوں کی کتابوں میں نفرت .جماعت اسلامی کی دکان امریکا اور اسرایل کی نفرت سے چلتی ہے چاہے ملک میں مسلمان مسلمان کو قتل کرے یہ کتنے ہی اجتمائی زنا کے واقعے ہوں یہ مولوی کچھ نہیں بولتے بولتے ہیں تو ہزاروں میل دور ہونے والے واقے پر جس سے ان کی “مسلمانی ” جاگتی ہو .نوے فیصد پیشہ ور مولویوں کی بنیاد کسی نہ کسی کی مذمت یا نفرت پر ہے ،اور کچھ نہیں تو ان مولویوں کو “اسلامی نظام ” کی نی بدعت نے متاثر کر دیا ہے ،روزانہ یہ خواب دیکھتے ہیں کے ایک دن ان کی جماعت کا امیر پاکستان کا امیر المومنین بنا ہوگا اسی بنیاد پر یہ ہر حکومت اور سیاسی جماعت کی مخالفت کرتے ہیں .
    ان مولویوں کے پاس بس نفرت ،گولی ،گالی ،غصہ اور سفاکیت ہے ،کیا ان کو دیکھ کر کوئی کہ سکتا ہے کے یہ ایک ایمان والے مومن کی صفات ہیں ؟ کیہ یہ قرآن میں بیان کی گئی “عباد الرحمن ” کی نشانیوں میں سے کسی ایک پر بھی پورے اترتے ہیں ؟
    برصغیر سے کروڑوں لوگ آج جو مسلمان ہیں وہ ایمان اور محبت کے پیغام کو دل سے قبول کرکے مسلمان ہوئے ہیں نہ کے کسی “اسلامی نظام ” یا کسی کے ڈنڈے کے زور پر ،جب نہ پاکستان تھا ، نہ جہادی نہ پاکستانی “فوج ” اسلام کی حفاظت کے لیہ اور اس دور میں اسلام ان بزرگان دین کے ذریے پھلا پھولا .اسلام دل سے قبول کرنے کا نام ہے ،اس کے فائدے روحانی ہے اور مولوی اس سے دنیا ڈھونڈ رہا ہے اور کاروبار بنا رہا ہے .
    حدیث میں ہے جس کا مفہوم یہ ہے کہ آخری زمانے میں دین دنیا کے لیہ حاصل کیا جائے گا اور جو یہ لوگ کریں گے ان کی زبان شیریں پر دل بھیڑیے کے ہونگے اور الله ان کو ایسے فتنوں میں مبتلا کرے گا کے عقل والوں کی عقل دنگ رہ جائے گی

  41. لبرل ووٹرز ،تنگ نظر قیادت

    پنجاب اور لاہور میں بریلوی مکتبہ فکر رکھنے والوں کی اکثریت ہے ،پر وہاں کے لوگوں نے کبھی مذہبی جماعت کو ووٹ نہیں دیے ،مطلب یہ کہ لوگ سیاست اور مذہب کو الگ رکھنا چاہتے ہیں ،پر پنجاب کی بڑی سیاسی جماعتیں ،پنجاب سے اکثریت رکھنے والی فوج ،ایجنسیز اور شخصیات جیسے حمید گل ،عمران خان ،شہباز شریف ،نواز شریف ،رانا ثنااللہ ،حافظ سلمان بٹ وغیرہ اگر طالبان اور سپاہ صحابہ جیسی تنظیموں کی حمایت کرتے ہوں یا ان کے لیہ نرم گوشہ رکھتے ہوں تو ووٹرز یہ ضرور سوچ رہے ہونگے کے ان کے ووٹ مذہب یا فرقے کی بنیاد پر نہیں تھے پر ان جماعتوں کی قیادت مذہب کی بنیاد پر سیاست کر رہی ہے یا ان کی حمایت کر رہی ہے اور ان کو یہ دیکھ کر ضرور مایوسی ہوئی ہوگی
    پاکستان میں سیاسی مذہبی جماعتوں کا نہ تو کامیاب ماضی ہے اور نہ ہی مستقبل
    اگر کوئی یہ سوچ رہا ہے کے پاکستان کو عبدلوہاب کا سعودی عرب یا ملا عمر کا افغانستان بنا سکتے ہیں تو یہ بڑی بھول ہے ،پچھلی صدی میں عبدلوہاب نجدی کی حکومت صرف چند لاکھ لوگوں پر قائم ہوئی تھی وہ بھی انگریز کی مدد سے ،اور ملا عمر کی حکومت بھی بیس سال کی جنگ کے بعد افغانستان کے کچھ شہروں میں پاکستانی فوج کی مدد سے بنی ،جبکے پاکستان کروڑوں کی آبادی والا ملک ہے جہاں مختلف رنگ و نسل اور مختلف مذہبی خیالات رکھنے والے لوگ رہتے ہیں ،اگر عرب ممالک کے پیسوں سے چلنے والے مدرسے میں بیٹھے عالم اور مفتی امیر المومنین بنے کے خواب دیکھ رہے ہیں ،یا امریکی ڈالروں پر پلنے والے موچھوں والے کچھ فوجی اگر پاکستان میں اسلامی انقلاب لانے کی کوششوں میں مصروف ہیں ،یا جماعت اسلامی کے بیس ہزار کارکن بیس کروڑ لوگوں پر “اسلامی حکومت ” لانے کی کوشش کر رہے ہیں تو ان کی یہ خوہش اور خواب کبھی پورے نہیں ہو سکیں گےاور یہ لوگ بیوقوفوں کی جنّت میں رہ رہے ہیں –
    حکومت کا معملا انتظامی ہے نہ کے مذہبی، یہی سوچ کر لوگ سیکولر جماعتوں کو ووٹ دیتے ہیں اور مذہب اور فرقے سے بالاتر ہوکر سوچتے ہیں .پر ان سیکولر ووٹرز کی مذہبی قیادت عوام پر کیا اثر ڈال رہی ہے یہ انے والے سالوں میں ہی پتا چلے گا .
    میں سوچتا ہوں کے عمران خان کو کون شیا ،قادیانی یا بریلوی ووٹ دیگا ؟
    یا رانا ثنااللہ جو سپاہ صحابہ کے پکے حمایتی ہیں ،ان کی جماعت مسلم لیگ کے ووٹز کیا سوچ رہے ہونگے جو دوسرے مکتبہ فکر سے تعلق رکھتے ہیں ؟؟
    اگر مسلم لیگ پجاب کی حکومت اہلحدیث جماعت الدعوہ کو فنڈز دیتی ہے جن کو بریلوی ووٹرز کبھی بھی ووتے نہ دیں تو پھر ان لبرل اور سیکولر ووٹرز کو ووٹ دیتے ہوئے یہ ضرور سوچنا ہوگا کہ جنھیں یہ ووٹ دے رہے ہیں وہ مذہبی یا فرقہ وارانہ نہیں ہیں بلکے مذہب اور فرقوں سے بالاتر صرف عوام کی خدمت کے لئے ہیں

  42. by .khursheed nadeem میڈیا اور اہل سیاست کی کشمکش
    اہلِ سیاست کے فکر و عمل کا یہ تضاد ہر اس شخص کے لیے بھی ناقابلِ فہم ہے جو ان کے لیے کلمہ خیر کہتا ہے۔
    اگر پنجاب اسمبلی کے منتخب ارکان اہلِ سیاست ہیں تو پھرنوازشریف، جاوید ہاشمی، پرویز رشید اورچوہدری شجاعت حسین صاحب کون ہیں؟ اگر یہ سیاست دان ہیں تو پھر پنجاب اسمبلی کے اراکین کو ن ہیں؟ اگر دونوں اہلِ سیاست کی نمائندگی کر رہے ہیں تو پھر یہ تضاد کیوں ہے؟
    فکر و عمل کا یہ تضاد دو میں سے کسی ایک نتیجے پر منتج ہوتا ہے۔ یہ ذہنی پراگندگی کی دلیل ہے۔آپ اپنے مؤقف میں واضح ہیں اور نہ یہ جانتے ہیں کہ آپ کیا فرما رہے ہیں۔ دوسرا امکان کردار کی اس کمزوری کی علامت ہے جسے منافقت کہتے ہیں ۔ آپ نے تقسیمِ کار کا اصل اختیار کیا ہے۔ ایک طرف اراکینِ پنجاب اسمبلی سے کہا گیا ہے کہ آپ میڈیا پر چڑھ دوڑیں۔ دوسری طرف آپ نے کچھ لوگوں کو یہ ذمہ داری سونپی ہے کہ آپ زخموں پر مرہم رکھیں۔ یہی جاگیردارانہ سیاست کا آزمودہ حربہ ہے۔ کچھ لوگوں کو بھیج کر کسی کو بے عزت کرنا اور پھر ثالث بن کر صلح کروا دینا۔ آج لوگ دوسری بات کہہ رہے ہیں۔ میرے پاس یہ کہنے کے لیے کوئی واقعاتی شہادت نہیں ہے، اس لیے میرا رحجان پہلی بات کی طرف ہے۔
    میڈیا کے بارے میں اہلِ سیاست میں پایا جانے والا یہ ابہام نیا نہیںہے۔میڈیا جب دوسرے فریق کا احتساب کرتا اور اسے آڑے ہاتھوں لیتا ہے تو وہ اس پہ تالی پیٹتے اور آزادی صحافت کا گیت گاتے ہیں۔ یہ سلسلہ دراز ہوتا رہے تو وہ خوش رہتے ہیں۔ جیسے ہی اس کا رخ تالیاں بجانے والوں کی طرف ہوتا ہے انہیں ضابطہ اخلاق یاد آ جاتا ہے اور وہ پھر اپنے حقوق کی دہائی دیتے ہیں۔غور کیجیے تو اہلِ سیاست کا یہی رویہ فوج اور عدلیہ کے بارے میں بھی رہا ہے۔ عدلیہ آزاد ہے اگر اس کے فیصلے آپ کے حق میں ہیں۔ فوج جمہوریت کی دوست ہے اگرفریقِِ مخالف کی حکومت ختم کرتی ہے۔ لیکن جیسے ہی ان کا رخ آپ کی طرف ہوتا ہے، رائے بدلنے لگتی ہے۔کیا ان تضادات کے تحت اہلِ سیاست اپنا اعتبار قائم کر سکتے ہیں۔ میر اخیال ہے مشکل ہوگا۔
    سب سے حیران کن رویہ نوازشریف صاحب کا ہے۔ایک طرف وہ عصری سیاست کے جملہ اطوار سے پوری طرح مستفید ہورہے ہیں اور دوسری طرف وہ اپنا دامن بھی صاف رکھنا چا ہتے ہیں۔وصال صنم اور خدا کو پا نے کی خواہشات بالعموم ایک ساتھ پو ری نہیں ہوتیں۔یہ بات باور کرنا ممکن نہیں کہ وہ ثنا اللہ مستی خیل صاحب کی تایخ اور اعمال سے بے خبر تھے۔ یہ ان پر اچانک منکشف ہوا کہ یہ صاحب کسی اور کے ایجنڈے پر کام کر رہے تھے۔اسی طرح وہ ایک ضمنی انتخاب میں میسر تمام صوبائی اختیارات کا بے دردی سے استعمال کر تے ہیں اورپھر یہ خواہش بھی رکھتے ہیں کہ انتخابات میں دھاندلی نہ ہو۔میڈیا کی جو بات اس وقت اہل ِسیاست کو پریشان کیے ہوئے ہے،وہ انہی تضادات کی نشان دہی ہے۔ اب مسئلہ یہ پیدا ہو گیا ہے کہ جمہوریت کا کو ئی تصور آزادی صحافت کے بغیر قا بل ِقبول نہیں۔اگر کو ئی سیاست دان اس سے عدم وا بستگی کااعلان کرتا ہے توجمہوریت سے اس کی وابستگی مشکوک قرار پا تی ہے۔حکومتیں چا ہتی یہی ہیں کہ وہ طاقت کے استعمال سے مخالفانہ جذبات کو دبا دیں لیکن آج کے دور میںیہ بات جنرل پرویز مشرف صاحب جیسے آمر کے لیے ممکن نہیں توجمہوریت کی دعویٰ رکھنے والی کسی سیاسی قیادت کے لیے کیسے ممکن ہے۔؟یہی مخمصہ ہے کہ جس میں اس وقت سیاست دان مبتلا ہیں اور اس کا ایک مظاہرہ پنجاب اسمبلی کی قرار داد اور اس پر سیاست دانوں کے رد عمل میں ہوا۔
    اس سارے معا ملے کا بہر طور ایک مثبت پہلو بھی ہے۔جمہوریت کی برکات اب ظاہرہو نے لگی ہیں۔جس طرح ہمارے ہاں لوگ اہل ِ مذہب کی خرابیوں کو بنیاد بنا کر مذہب کی نفی کرتے ہیں اسی طرح کچھ لوگ اہل ِسیاست کے قا بل ِاعتراض افعال کی اساس پر جمہوریت کو مطعون کرتے ہیں۔یہ دونوں رویے کم نظری کی دلیل ہیں۔اہل ِسیاست کی ناکامیاںیاتضادات اگر سامنے آرہی ہیں تو یہ اس بات کا اعلان ہے کہ جمہوریت کامیابی کی طرف رواں دواں ہے۔جمہوریت کا کام ہی یہ ہے کہ وہ لوگوں پر ہر بات واضح کر دے تا کہ کوئی انہیں دھو کہ نہ دے سکے اور انہیں فیصلہ کر نے میں آسانی ہو۔اس کام کا آغاز ہو گیا ہے اور لوگ اگلے عام انتخابات میں اس کے مثبت نتا ئج دیکھیں گے جب یہ لوگ عوام کے پاس آئیں گے۔مستی خیلوں کے پیچھے جو خر مستیاں کارفرما ہیں،اب ان کی بات ہو نے لگی ہے۔یہ بات آگے بڑھتی ہے تو اس سے سیاست کے بہت سے عقدے کھلیں گے۔
    جمہوریت میں تطہیر کا یہ عمل کسی ایک شعبے میں نہیں ہو تا۔یقیناً میڈیا کی کارکردگی بھی پر کھی جا ئے گی اور لوگ اس کے بارے میں بھی ایک رائے قائم کریں گے۔اس کا ندازہ سیاسی ٹاک شوزکی بڑھتی ہو ئی عدم مقبولیت سے کیا جا سکتا ہے۔جب بعض اینکرز کے ہاں لوگوں نے یہ جانا کہ ایک فرد ان کا نشانہ ہے تو اس پر ان لوگوں نے بھی منفی رد َعمل کا اظہار کیا جو ان کے ہدف کے لیے نا پسندیدگی کے جذبات رکھتے تھے۔ اگر اہل ِسیاست کے بارے میں میڈیا بحیثیت مجمو عی عدم توازن کا شکار ہوا ہے تواس پر بھی یقیناًعوامی رد ِعمل سامنے آجا ئے گا۔اگر اہل سیاست کو کوئی جائز شکایت ہے تو وہ بھی اپنا مقدمہ عوام کے سامنے رکھ دیں۔میڈیا بھی عوامی جذبات کے خلاف رویہ اپنا کر قائم نہیں رہ سکتا۔جمہوریت دراصل یہ بھی سکھا تی ہے کہ کسی کے خلاف ناراضی کا اظہار کیسے کیا جا تا ہے۔ ہندوستان کی تقسیم ہو ئی تو فسادات میں بہت سے لوگ کام آئے۔جواہر لال نہرونے اس پر تبصرہ کرتے ہو ئے کہا کہ یہ درد ِزہ(birth pangs) ہے جو اس کا اظہار ہے کہ نئے ملک پیدا ہو رہے ہیں۔پنجاب اسمبلی کی قرارداد اور اس کے بعد سامنے آنے والا ردِعمل تکلیف دہ ہے لیکن انہیں درد ِز ہ سمجھنا چاہیے کہ ایک جمہوری معاشرہ جنم لے رہا ہے۔
    تشویش کی بات البتہ یہ ہے کہ سب نے اپنے اپنے گروہ کا ساتھ دیا۔کسی نے خود احتسابی کی ضرورت نہیں محسوس کی۔

  43. by khursheed nadeem

    شکریہ رانا صاحب!
    ہم سب کو رانا ثنااللہ صاحب کا شکر گزار ہو نا چا ہیے کہ انہوں نے واقعات کی حد تک،ابہام کے وہ سب جا لے اتار دیے جو پنجاب اسمبلی کی قرارداد کے گرد بُنے ہو ئے تھے۔ انہوں نے برادرم رؤف کلاسرا کے انکشافات کی مکمل تصدیق کرتے ہو ئے بتا دیاہے کہ ان کے ہم نام کے خلاف کو ئی کاروائی نہیں ہو سکتی۔رانا صاحب نے واضح لفظوں میں میاں نوازشریف صاحب کو پیغام دے دیا ہے کہ انہیں اپنے مؤقف سے رجوع کر ناہوگا۔واقعات کی تصدیق کے بعد اب زیر ِ بحث سوال یہ ہے کہ اہل ِسیاست با لخصوص مسلم لیگ (ن)کو یہ ہزیمت کیوں اٹھانا پڑی؟
    اس کا سادہ سا جواب ہے ”اخلاقی کمزوری”۔باقی سب اسی کی تفسیر ہے۔یہ واضح ہے کہ آزاد میڈیا صرف اسے راس آتا ہے جس کا دامن صاف ہو۔مجھے اندازہ ہے کہ یہ آزادی حدود سے تجاوز بھی کر تی ہے۔لیکن اس سے انہیں کو ئی پریشانی نہیں ہو تی جنہیں اپنی ذات پر اعتماد ہوتا ہے۔واقعات کی گواہی یہ ہے کہ اگر کسی عزت دار کی پگڑی اچھالی گئی تو اسے غائبانہ نصرت میسر آئی اور اس کے وقار میں کو ئی کمی نہیں آئی،بلکہ یہ ہوا کہ ایسی مذموم کو شش میں ملوث لوگ عمر بھر وضاحتیں پیش کر تے رہے۔مو لانا سید ابو الاعلیٰ مو دودی ہماری سیاسی تاریخ کی ان شخصیات میں سے ہیں،جن کے افکا ر کی صحت تو زیر ِ بحث رہی لیکن ان کے اجلے دامن پر کسی داغ کی نشان دہی نہ کی جا سکی۔ایک دفعہ سیاسی مخالفین نے ان کا ایک نا زیبا کارٹون شائع کیا۔یہ کارٹون مو لا نا کا تو کچھ نہ بگاڑ سکا لیکن کارٹون شائع کرنے والوں کے دامن سے چپک گیا۔ایک معافی مانگ کر دینا سے رخصت ہو ئے اور جو زندہ ہیں وہ اس سے اعلان ِ برأت کر تے رہتے ہیں۔مجھے مو لا نا کی ١٧٩١ء کی ایک تقریر یاد ہے جو اتفاق سے آڈیو پر بھی مو جود ہے۔ اس میں انہوں نے جماعت اسلامی کے کا رکنوں کو مخاطب کر تے ہو ئے یہ کہا کہ انہیں میری ذات پر ہو نے والی تنقید کا جواب دینے کی ضرورت نہیں۔ان کا کہنا تھا کہ وہ اس سرزمین پر کو ئی اجنبی شخص نہیں ہیں۔لوگ انہیں مدت سے جا نتے ہیں۔ان کا یہ ماضی خود ان کا دفاع ہے۔جب اہل ِ سیاست کو یہ اعتماد میسر ہو تو پھر میڈیا کی ”آزادی ” ان کی حیثیت ِ عرفی کو متاثر نہیں کر تی۔مسئلہ انہیں ہو تا ہے جو دو چہروں کے ساتھ جیتے ہیں۔انہیں ہر وقت یہ خوف دامن گیر رہتا ہے کہ کہیں ان کی چوری پکڑی نہ جا ئے۔اس کے لیے وہ میڈیا کی خو شامند کر تے ہیں یا پھراس کا منہ بند کر نے کو شش میں لگے رہتے ہیں۔ دوسرا کام اب مشکل ہو گیا ہے۔اس لیے پہلا طریقہ ہی زیا دہ مستعمل ہے۔تاہم ہمارے سیاست دان دوسرے متبادل کو فراموش نہیں کرتے اور اس حوالے سے بھی طریقے سوچتے رہتے ہیں۔
    پنجاب اسمبلی کی قرارداد کے بعد جو کچھ ہو ا اس سے مسلم لیگ کی قیادت اپنی اسی اخلاقی کمزوری کے باعث بوکھلاہٹ کا شکار ہو گئی اور پورس کے ہاتھیوں کی طرح اپنی ہی فوج پر چڑھ دوڑی۔اس گھبراہٹ میں اسے ایک ایسے مقدمے سے رجوع کر نا پڑا جس کا اگر دفاع کیا جاتا تو شایدوہ اس جگ ہنسائی سے محفوظ رہ سکتے تھے جس کا انہیں اب سامنا ہے۔میر اخیال یہ ہے کہ مسلم لیگ کو میڈیا سے جو شکایات تھیں،انہیں میڈیا کی نمائندہ تنظیموں کے ساتھ زیر بحث لا نا چا ہیے تھا اور اس معا ملے میں اپنا مؤ قف پیش کر نا چا ہیے تھا۔اس کے بعد ان کا کام ختم ہو جاتا۔اب ان کی شکایات کا ازالہ ہو جا تا یا یا میڈیا کی روش میں کو ئی تبدیلی نہ آتی۔ اگر اہل ِسیاست حق بجانب ہو تے تو ان کے صبر کے نتیجے میں میڈیا کو عوامی ناراضی اور ساکھ کا مسئلہ درپیش ہوتا۔اس کی تازہ ترین مثال صدر آصف زرداری ہیں۔جب ان کے خلاف بعض لوگوں نے یک طرفہ مہم چلا ئی اور جوا باً صدر زرداری نے صبر کو بطورحکمت عملی اختیار کیا تو معا ملے کی نو عیت تبدیل ہو گئی۔عوام نے زرداری صاحب کو مظلوم جانا اور ان کے نا قدین کو ہزیمت کا سامنا کر نا پڑا۔ یہ ممکن ہے کہ ان پر تنقید میں بعض باتیں درست بھی ہوں لیکن فریقین کے عمومی رویے نے ان باتوں کی صحت کو بھی مشکوک بنا دیا۔یہ راستہ مسلم لیگ (ن) کے لیے کھلا تھا اور پنجاب اسمبلی کے اراکین کے لیے بھی۔میں شوکت عزیز بھٹی جیسوںکے درد کو محسوس کر سکتا ہوں لیکن اگر وہ صبر کرتے تو ان کی اخلاقی قوت میں اضافہ ہوتا ۔مسلم لیگ(ن) ہی کے ایک ایم پی اے یاسر رضاکوجعلی ڈگری کی بنیاد پر نا اہل قرار دیا گیا ہے۔انہوں نے سپریم کورٹ سے رجوع کیا ہے۔میرا خیال ہے کہ انہوں نے درست فیصلہ کیا ہے اور اگر وہ عدالت عظمیٰ سے بھی سرخرو ہوتے ہیں تو اس سے ان کی ساکھ میں بہتری آئے گی۔
    جب میثاق ِ جمہوریت کواختیار کرتے ہو ئے بڑی سیاسی جماعتوں نے اپنے ماضی سے رجوع کر لیا تھاتو انہیں یہ بھی چا ہیے تھا کہ وہ اپنی نئی اخلاقی بنیادوں کو مضبوط بنا تے۔اس کے بعد اگر کوئی انہیں ماضی کا حوالہ دیتا تو لوگ اسے بد ذوق کہتے۔لیکن یہ نئے واقعات بتاتے ہیں کہ اخلاقی بہتری کو کسی نے اپنا ہدف نہیں بنا یا۔کسی نے جمشید دستی پر اصرار کیا اور کسی نے پیجاب اسمبلی کا ڈرامہ کیا۔میرا خیال ہے کہ یہ واقعہ اہل ِسیاست کے لیے تنبیہہ ہے کہ وہ اپنی اخلاقی تعمیر کو ترجیح بنائیں۔اس کے بعد انہیں میڈیا سے خوف زدہ ہو نے کی ضرورت ہے نہ عدلیہ سے۔رانا ثنا اللہ صاحب نے بتا دیا ہے کہ اس قرارداد کی تیاری میں اٹھارہ اراکین ِ اسمبلی شامل تھے اور ثنااللہ مستی خیل صاحب اس میں شریک نہیں تھے۔انہوں نے صرف یہ قرارداد پیش کی۔ان کا کہنا ہے کہ اٹھارہ آ دمیوں کی سزاایک کو نہیں دی جا سکتی۔ اب دیکھیے نواز شریف صاحب کیا کہتے ہیں۔یہ واقعہ اخلاقی تطہیر کلا نقطہ آغاز بنتا ہے یا تضادات کو نبہانے کی نئی کو شش کا؟س

  44. http://www.jasarat.com/unicode/detail.php?category=1&newsid=40737&date=2010-07-27

    http://www.jasarat.com/unicode/printnews.php?category=1&newsid=40737

    بنگلہ دیش: جماعت اسلامی کے 4مرکزی رہنماؤں کے وارنٹ جاری

    ڈھاکا( مانیٹرنگ ڈیسک)بنگلہ دیش کے جنگی جرائم ٹریبونل نے جماعت اسلامی کے 4مرکزی رہنماو¿ں پر 1971ءمیں جنگی جرائم کا مرتکب ہونے کا الزام لگاتے ہوئے گرفتاری کے احکامات جاری کردیے ہیں۔یہ ٹریبونل 1971ءمیں پاکستان سے آزادی کی جنگ میں جنگی جرائم میں ملوث افراد کے خلاف کارروائی کے حوالے سے مقدمات سن رہا ہے۔ یہ ٹریبونل رواں سال مارچ میں قائم کیا گیا تھا۔فرانسیسی خبر رساں ایجنسی اے ایف پی کے مطابق پیر کو ٹریبونل کی پہلی سماعت ہوئی‘ جس میں جماعت اسلامی کے 4رہنماو¿ں کی گرفتاری کے وارنٹ جاری کیے گئے۔جن رہنماو¿ں کے وارنٹ گرفتاری جاری کیے گئے ہیں ان میں جماعت اسلامی کے امیر مطیع الرحمن نظامی، ان کے نائب علی احسن محمد مجاہد، محمد قمر الزمان اور عبدالقادر مولا شامل ہیں۔ برطانوی خبر رساں ایجنسی رائٹرزکے مطابق وکیل استغاثہ غلام عارف ٹیپو نے میڈیا کو بتایا کہ ٹریبونل میں انہوں نے استدعا کی ہے کہ پولیس ان 4رہنماو¿ں کو ٹریبونل میں پیش کرے۔جماعت اسلامی نے ان الزامات کی تردید کی ہے اور حکومت پر الزام لگایا ہے کہ وہ جماعت پر جھوٹے الزام لگا رہی ہے۔اس کے علاوہ جماعت اسلامی کے ایک اور رہنما دلاور حسین سیدی پر بھی ست خیرہ ڈسٹرکٹ میں جنگی جرائم کا مرتکب ہونے کا الزام لگائے جانے کا امکان ہے۔ٹریبونل کی اگلی سماعت 2اگست کو ہو گی۔

  45. sabab aur nateja – by khursheed nadeem

    سبب اور نتیجہ
    آسمان نا مہربان، زمین بے مہر۔انسانی بستیوں میں درندوں کا راج۔۔۔۔ ایسے لمحوں میں حرف ِ تسلی کس غم کا مداوا کر سکتا ہے؟ لیکن ہم کس درجہ بے تو فیق ہیں کہ اس کے سوا ہمارے دامن میں کچھ بھی نہیں!
    میں کراچی کے بے اماں شہریوں کے کس کام آ سکتا ہوں؟ میں پشاور میں شہید ہونے والے پو لیس کے جوان کو کیا دے سکتا ہوں؟میں برستے آ سمان کے زخم خورہ ہم وطنوں کی کیا داد رسی کر سکتا ہوں؟لوڈ شیڈنگ کا عذاب سہنے والوں کے لیے میرے پاس کیا ہے؟ایسا خالی دامن تومیں کبھی نہیں تھا۔اس عالم میں مجھے کیا کرنا چا ہیے؟ حکومت کی مذمت۔۔۔۔؟یہ کا م تو بہت سے لوگ کر رہے ہیں۔دوسروں کے عیبوں پر نظر ۔۔۔؟اس کار ِ خیر میں بھی کئی دوست مصروف ہیں۔پھر کیا میرے لیے کو ئی کام باقی نہیں ؟
    ہم اس صورت ِحال سے اچانک دو چار نہیں ہوئے۔یہ برسوں کی ریا ضت کا نتیجہ ہے۔اس مجاہدے کا حاصل یہ ہے کہ ہم نے اس کام کا ابھی آ غاز ہی نہیں کیا جو سب سے پہلے کیا جا نا چا ہیے تھا۔یہ کام تعمیر ِ ِ معا شرہ ہے۔ ہم نے وہ سماج قائم نہیںکیا جس میں یہ صلاحیت ہو کہ وہ اپنے دکھوں کا مدا وا کر سکے اور آنے والے وقت کی رفتار سے باخبر ہو کر قدم اٹھا ئے۔اس کے نتا ئج ہمارے چاروں طرف بکھرے ہیں۔اس سیلاب کو دیکھیے۔با رشوں کا مو سم ہمیشہ ایسے ہی نا مہرباں ہو تا ہے۔ پھر یہ کہ اچانک نہیں آتا۔ساون بھادوں پر ہم نے شعر لکھے، دومانوی داستانیں بیان کیں لیکن اس پر کبھی نہیں سوچا کہ آسمان بر ستا ہے تو لازم ہے کہ کچی چھت ٹپکنے لگے۔اگر ہماری چھت کچی ہے اور ہمیں بارشوں کے مزاج کا بھی علم ہے تو ہم نے اس سے بچا ئو کی کیا تدبیر کی؟اگر نہیں کی تو اس کا ذمہ دار کون ہے؟تمثیل کو ایک طرف رکھیے،واقعہ یہ ہے کہ ہم نے تو ہمات کا پیچھا کیا یا خوا ہشات کا۔ہم نے اس نظام کو سمجھنے کی کوشش ہی نہیں کی جس کے تابع یہ کار ِ جہاں رواں دواں ہے۔جہاں ”زمینی حقائق” کا اعتراف غیرت کے منا فی ہو،وہاں اس نظام ِ قدرت کا اعتراف محال ہے۔
    قوم کی تعمیر کا آغاز سوچ کی تعمیر سے ہو تا ہے۔ سب سے پہلے کچھ بنیادی اصولوں کو تعین ہو تا ہے جس کے بعد عملی تعمیر کا آغاز ہو تا ہے۔مثال کے طور پر یہ اصول کہ وہ قوم کبھی ترقی نہیں کر سکتی جو اپنی نا کامیوں کے اسباب خارج میں تلاش کر تی ہے۔آج ہمارے اہل ِ دانش، با جماعت ایک فکر کی آبیاری کرتے ہیں: ہماری بدحالی کا سبب یہ ہے کہ ہم اغیار کی سازش کا ہدف رہے یا جارحیت کا۔اس میں کو ئی شبہ نہیں کہ سازش ہے اور جارحیت بھی لیکن یہ ہماری پستی کا سبب نہیں ،نتیجہ ہیں۔اگر ہماری اجتما عی سوچ کا پہلا پتھر درست ہو تا تو ہماری حکمت عملی با لکل دوسری ہو تی۔ اگر ہم نتیجے اور سبب کے فرق کو جان لیتے تو ہمارا مو قف یہ ہو تا کہ ہماری پر یشانیوں کا سبب یہ ہے کہ ہم نے اپنی تعمیر پر محنت نہیں کی۔ہم اگر اس طرح سوچتے تو بارشوں کی آمد سے پہلے اپنی کچی چھت کی فکر کر تے۔اب یہ ہے کہ بارشیں بر ستی ہیں ،چھتیں ٹپکتی ہیں اور ہم اس کا الزام حکومت کو دیتے ہیں یا اسے عذاب ِ الہی قرار دے کر اپنے آپ کو معصوم ثابت کر دیتے ہیں۔ میر ابچپن دیہات میں گزرا ہے۔ میرے گھر کی چھت بھی کچی تھی ۔مجھے آج بھی یاد ہے کہ ساون کی آمد سے پہلے میری والدہ کو فکر ہو تی تھی اور بارش کے موسم سے پہلے چھتوں کی لپائی ہو جا تی تھی۔میںاس دور کی شدید بارشیں نہیں بھولا جب گلیوں میں پانی کھڑا ہو تا تھا۔میرے والد مضطرب ہو تے تھے کہ ان کا مسجد جانا مشکل ہو گیاحالانکہ وہ ہمارے گھر سے چند قدم پر تھی۔اس کے باوجود اگر کبھی چھت ٹپکی تو اتنا ہی کہ اس جگہ پر ایک کٹورا رکھ دیا جا تا۔مجھے نہیں یاد کہ ہمارے گائوں میں کبھی چھت گرنے سے کو ئی انسانی جان ضائع ہو ئی ہو۔آج جب آ بادی بڑھ گئی اور انتظام نسبتاًمشکل ہو گیا ،ہم پر لازم تھا کہ حکومت سے لے کر گھر کے مالک تک ،ہم اپنی ذمہ داری محسوس کر تے اور اس خسارے سے کسی حد تک بچ جا تے جس کا آج ہم شکار ہیں۔
    یہ سب کچھ کیوں ہوا؟ ہم نے کو ئی منصوبہ بندی نہیں کی۔ہم نے مستقبل کے تیور نہیں پہچانے۔ اس کا سبب یہ ہے کہ ہماری قومی سوچ میں ایک کجی آ گئی ہے۔ ہم تعمیر پر یقین نہیں رکھتے۔ ہم اپنی تباہی کیااسباب خارج میں تلاش کرتے ہیں۔نتائج سے واضح ہے کہ کسی صوبا ئی حکومت کے پاس
    ہنگامی صورت حال سے نمٹنے کی کو ئی منصوبہ بندی نہیں۔ معاشرتی سطح پر بھی اس کا کو ئی ادراک مو جود نہیں۔ٹیلی وژن ،اخبارات،کہیں مجھے اس سوچ کی کو ئی جھلک،الاما شااللہ، دکھا ئی نہیں دی کہ ہم سیلابوں کی صورت حال کا کو ئی سائنسی جا ئزہ لیں اور ساری دنیا کی طرح وقت سے پہلے اس سے بچا ئو کا منصوبہ بنا ئیں۔میں جا نتا ہوں کہ یہ کبھی نہیں ہوگا۔یہ احساس وہاں پیدا ہو تا ہے جہاں سوچ کا زاویہ دوسرا ہو تاہے۔جہاں یہ بات طے ہو تی ہے کہ ہمیں اپنے غموں کا مداوا خود کر نا ہے۔
    کراچی اگر جرائم پیشہ گروہوں کے دست ِ قدرت میں ہے تو اس کے اسباب داخلی ہیں۔ کراچی میں اس قتل عام کو روکا جا سکتا ہے اگر اقتدار پر فائز گروہ یہ طے کر لیں کہ انسانی لا شوں پرسیاست نہیں ہو گی۔بارش رحمت بن سکتی ہے اگر کالاباغ ڈیم جیسے منصوبوں پر سیاست نہ کی جائے۔مذہب دنیا اور آخرت میں نجات کی آ واز بن سکتا ہے اگر محراب وممبر قال اللہ وقال الرسول کے لیے خاص ہو جا ئیں۔خود کشیوں کا خاتمہ ہو سکتا ہے اگر لوگ ہمسائے کے حقوق کا لحاظ رکھیں۔کراچی میں غیر ملکی مداخلت کا امکان رد نہیں ہو سکتا۔مذہبی انتہا پسندی کے پیچھے بھی سازش ہو سکتی ہے ۔لیکن یہ کسی بات کا نتیجہ ہیںسبب نہیں۔اگر ہم اس فرق کو جان لیں تو ہماری حکمت عملی بالکل دوسری ہو گی۔اگر ایسا ہو تو میں پو رے یقین سے کہہ سکتا ہوں کہ اگلے سال بارشوں کا جتنا زور ہو،اللہ نے چاہا تووہ ہمارے لیے رحمت ہوں گی۔اگر ایسا ہے تو میرے پاس قوم کے لیے امید کا پیغام ہے۔ اگر سوچ کا زاویہ وہی ہے تو پھر صرف حرف ِ تسلی ہے اور حرف ِ تسلی کسی غم کا مداوا نہیں۔

  46. The facts behind reality

    President Asif Ali Zardari rounded off a trip to Britain by addressing a political rally Saturday, has faced criticism and protesters for touring overseas as floods killed more than 1,500 people in his country.

    Most of private news channels of Pakistan had reales a F-A-K-E news that one heckler threw a shoe at Zardari during the event, missing the president, while outside the convention center police cordoned off more than 100 protesters but later on it become a pretense of courage.

    Now lets turn towards the both protesters weather they are in country or out of the country as the PAK media has shown only oneside of the fact to the people.

    The opposition leader Nawaz Sharif said that President should record his protest on the statement given by Britain cancelling his tour to UK and should be at home under the critical situation of stuck-flood in the country, Imran Khan from PTI and Altaf hussain MQM with same objections, On the other hand Imran khan who flew out from Pakistan with some of his party workers, Altaf who are living in london from many years till today and Mr. Nawaz shareef whose son has running business in London but never launched any donation cell for the victims of flood like the son of President Zardari…

    Bilawal Bhutto Zardari launched fund-raising campaign in London and collected 70,000 pounds within an half hour but also his daughter Bakhtawar Bhutto Zardari has launched a fund-raising campaign in Pakistan. However President Asif Ali Zardari announce Rs 5 million donation including Rs. 2 million for Bilawal campaign, Rs. 2 million for Bakhtawar campaign and Rs 1 million for the Prime Minister’s Flood Relief Fund.

    Now, first the question comes to mind..Did Nawaz or Imran launched a fund-raising cell being in Pakistan to suppourt the people of Pakistan…the answer is NO NO NO.

    So, We ( the nation) should have complete faith on the elected President and Prime Minister and should belive on the fact behind reality instead of News Channels.

    Written By: Rida Baloch

  47. The President’s tour targeted by the Media

    The day when the President leaves for official foreign tour, he comes to top of the list of baseless censuring by the Pakistani media.

    The objection raised on the issue of his visit was Cameron’s statement against Pakistan’s role in the ‘export of terror on which the media voiced that the President should cancel his visit to UK and also due the situation of the country which has been suffering from the worst monsoon floods in its history today. The provinces have casualities more than 1000, tens of thousands left marooned, thousands displaced, hundreds stranded in unreachable places or gone missing, with many living under open skies without ven the basic necessities for survival, homes have been demolished and more wide-spread destruction is expected by the rush of rains.

    However, The President’s aim was to discuss the key issues and to help remove the misconception of Cameron that has developed to be an issue between the two countries over the remarks of the latter allegedly linking Pakistan to terrorism.

    In the meeting with British Home Secretary, The President discussed matters regarding bilateral relations between the two countries, Pakistan’s fight against extremism and militancy, relief works for flood affectees in Pakistan, access to Pakistani goods in EU markets and visa issues. The President urged the international community to come forward and play their due role in extending support and assistance for the people affected by recent floods s and torrential rains in various parts of the country. The President appreciated British Government’s financial assistance of 5 million Pounds for flood victims in Pakistan and added that the magnitude of the devastations caused by the floods is very huge.
    Ms Theresa May appreciated the government’s determinations to fight against the militancy and terrorism. . She said that Britain would continue to support Pakistan in the fight against terrorism, building its ravaged economy and addressing issues pertaining to delays in Visa issuance to Pakistani nationals.

    In the meeting with Prime Minister Cameron, The President said assured him supporting Pakistan’s point of view in the European Union and the USA in securing access to Pakistani goods in these countries. He spoke of hundred years of relationship with the UK will stand together and face difficulties and weather storms to make the world more peaceful and secure. For his part the British Prime Minister described the meeting as excellent.
    “The President and I have been talking about what we see as an unbreakable relationship between the two countries based on their mutual interests. “Obviously, we talked about dreaded and devastating floods in Pakistan. The British Government stands ready to help more and as required to make sure that help is given to all.
    Above all, what we have been talking lately about “is our strategic partnership and how we deepen and enhance that partnership to make that we do all with the issues where we want to see progress, whether it is trade, education and also in the absolutely vital are of combating terrorism.”
    Cameron said both countries want to work together to combat terrorism and ensure global peace. “We want to work with Pakistan in this vast strategic partnership.”

    Addressing a big community meeting at International Convention Center, he said that party was pursuing the policy of reconciliation and mentioned the passage of 18th constitutional amendment, NFC award, autonomy to Gilgit Baltistan, Balochistan package and women empowerment bill as some of the steps taken by the Government to strengthen democracy. The President appealed to the international community and political parties at home to come together to help thousands of people who have become homeless in floods and are in distress. He further said without looking at what the polls say, the government took tough decisions. Agreement with IMF, price hike, rising energy prices were difficult for people but the government did not go for popular politics,he said adding the future generation would not have forgiven them for not waging fight against the terrorist mindset and for not ensuring food security. He said despite what was being said on television and reported in newspapers about popularity of PPP, its candidates had won some recent elections. He said, “you people supported Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Shaheed and now supporting Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, who today launched a fund-raising campaign in London for the flood affected people in Pakistan and within half an hour 70,000 pounds were collected.”

    Similarly, the President said Bakhtawar Bhutto Zardari has launched a fund-raising campaign in Pakistan and “I announce Rs 5 million donation including Rs. 2 million for Bilawal campaign, Rs. 2 million for Bakhtawar campaign and Rs. 1 million for the Prime Minister’s Flood Relief Fund”.

    But, unfortunately the media showed a completely opposite and a self-made ngative side of the picture. Trying to impose their own views on the people of Pakistan. Continuing in the circle of criticism, they (media) got out of the circle and circulated the rumour of a fake news about shoes been hurled on the President during his speech delivery in Birmingham after which he left the hall within seconds. Most of the channels had on-aired his speech in Birmingham immediately but nothing had happened as they had spread to be.

    So being a Pakistani, we should condemn this act of media who misguided the nation and should focus the successful tour of the President to UK.

    Written By: Rida Baloch

  48. https://docs.google.com/document/edit?id=1wDStJWmR9BANC2DDyBWhjH_LHiuUWqz_zZuFLQUKClQ&hl=en#

    ابلیس کی مجلس شوریٰ ان منصورہ

    جماعت اسلامی کا شوریٰ کا اجلاس ہے ،ہر طرف خاموشی اور سوگ کا عالم ہے .وجہ یہ ہے کے ملک میں امن و امان ہے کوئی خودکش دھماکہ یا ڈرون حملہ نہیں ہوا جس کی وجہ سے میڈیا والے انھیں نہیں بلا رہے ہیں اور قتل و فساد نہ ہونے کی وجہ سے جماعت اسلامی کا “پیغام ” پاکستانی عوام تک نہیں پہنچ پا رہا ہے .آج کل لوگ اپنے مسائل میں گھیرے ہوئے ہیں اور کوئی امریکا اور اسرایل کی مزمت نہیں کر رہا ،کشمیر کا مسلہ بھی قومی بن گیا ہے “اسلامی ” نہیں کہ جماعت اسلامی اس پر کچھ بات کرتی .آگے الیکشن بھی انے والا ہے .سارے کارکنان دل ہی دل میں یہ سوچ رہے تھے کے ایک دو دھماکے یا امریکا کے ڈرون اس وقت کی اہم ضرورت ہیں ،تاکے میڈیا پر جماعت اسلامی کو انے کا موقع ملے اور شریعت کے نفاذ ،بلیک واٹر ،طالبان مزاکرات کی بات کر کے “اسلامی انقلاب ” کی رہ ہموار ہو سکے .

    ماحول بڑا ہی افسردہ تھا یکایک ٹیلیفون کی گھنٹی بجتی ہے

    جماعت شوریٰ سیکریٹری : ہیلو

    کارکن : سلام علیکم

    جماعت شوریٰ سیکریٹری: وعلیکم سلام ،کیا حال ہیں ،کیا خبر ہے آج کی .آج کل منور حسن صاحب بہت افسردہ اور خفا ہیں

    کارکن : جناب میرے پاس آج ایک اچھی خبر ہے

    جماعت شوریٰ سیکریٹری :وہ کیا ؟

    کارکن : جناب دو خود کش دہماکے ہوئے ہیں ..مباک ہو

    جماعت شوریٰ سیکریٹری : کیا !! دھمکا ہو گیا ؟؟ کتنے مرے ؟

    کارکن :ابھی رپورٹس آرہی ہیں پر کافی ہلاکتیں ہیں اور طالبان نے قبول بھی کر لیا ہے ،پر یہ بتائیں اس دھماکے پر آج کی پالیسی کیا ہے ؟ ردعمل ؟ بلیک واٹر ؟ مزاکرات ،یا امریکا کی افغانستان میں موجودگی یا شریعت کا نفاذ ؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟

    جماعت شوریٰ سیکریٹری : اپ ووہی بولیں جو بولتے ہے ہیں .ہماری پالسی کے لیہ آپ آج ٹی وی چنلز پر اور اخبارات میں جماعت اسلامی کے حامیان کے تبصرے دیکھ سکتے ہیں ،جمید گل ،جامد میر کو ضرور دیکھیں اور عنصر عباسی اور عرفان صدیقی اور دوسرے ہمنواؤں کو پڑھتے رہیں اسی سے زہن تیار ہوگا .اور آپ ٹی وی دیکھتے رہیں امیر صاحب ہر چنل پر آئینگے

    جماعت سیکرٹری ، پوری شوریٰ اور منور حسن کو خوشی سے خبر سناتے ہوئے ……حضرات “طالبان ” نے دو خود کش دھماکے کر دیے ہیں تین سو کے قریب ہلاکتیں ہیں ایک شیعوں کی مسجد میں اور دوسرا ایک بازار میں ہوا ہے .

    امیر صاحب اور شوریٰ کے اراکین کے اندر ایک خوشی کی لہر دوڑ جاتی ہے آنکھوں میں چمک آجاتی ہے اور سب میں ایک اطمینان کی لہر دوڑ جاتی ہے

    جماعت کے امیر کہتے ہیں : ساتھیوں “اسلامی انقلاب ” دستک دے رہا ہے ،منزل قریب ہی ہے .

    اورایک جذباتی کارکن نعرے لگانا شورو کر دیتا ہے

    انقلاااااااااااااب انقلااااااااااااااااااب……………..اسلامی انقلاب

    یہ ملک بنا تھا اسلامی…………….، یہ ملک رہے گا اسلامی

    خوں رنگ لاے گا……………………….،انقلاب آ ے گا

    ( ایک رکن جنکا “ذہن ” ابھی پوری طرح تیار نہیں ہوا تھا اٹھ کر کہتے ہیں” حضرت آپ ان طالبانوں کی مذمت کیوں نہیں کرتے ؟ یہ لوگ تو ہمیں بھی نشانہ بناتے ہیں ،لوگ ان سے بیزار ہو رہے ہیں ،کیا ایسے قتل کی اسلام میں اجازت ہے ،کیا دین اسطرح غالب ہوگا ؟ ساری دنیا جانتی ہے کے یہ لوگوں کے مقصد کچھ اور ہیں اور مذہب کے نام پر معصوم لوگوں کو قتل کر رہے ہیں پر پھر بھی آپ لوگ ان کی مذمت نہیں کرتے ،سوات میں پہلے کہتے تھے کے یہ انڈین اجنٹ ہیں ،پھر کہتے تھے کے آپریشن بند کرو ،پھر ان سے مزاکرات اور پھر ان کی شریعت کی حمایت کرنے لگے پر جب آپریشن ہوا تو ان کا ساتھ بھی نہیں دیا ،کیا یہ منافقت نہیں ہے ؟ )

    جماعت کے امیر منور (تاریک) حسن نے انھیں خاموش رہنے کو کہا اور یہ کہا کے آپ کو اس پورے سیناریو کا پتا نہیں ،جن کی آپ بات کر رہے ہیں ان کی قیادت اپنوں ہی کے ہاتھو میں ہے .

    ابھی دھماکے کو ہوئے ایک گھنٹہ ہی نہیں گزرا تھا کہ بہت سی کالیں آنے لگیں ،پوری شوریٰ ایک ایک چنیل پر مصروف ہو گئی ،چنیل والے اپنے پروگرام میں انے کی دعوت دینے لگے اور وہ سارے لیڈر اور جماعتیں جنھیں عوام ووٹ نہیں دیتے ہیں ٹی وی پر اکر راگ گا نے لگے .

    ایک طرف ملا سفّاکی میڈیا پر قبول کر رہا تھا دوسری طرف جماعتی میڈیا پروپگنڈہ کرنے میں مصروف ہوگیا .

    پھر سے لوگوں کے گھر اجڑگئے ،بچے شہید ہو گئے پر جمید گل ،طالبان و عمران خان ،منور و تاریک حسن ،بازی حسین ،جامد میر ،عرفان باسی اور دوسروں کے مزے ہو گئے

    ایک ہی منور حسن مختلف چنیل پر ہے اور سو بہانے بنا رہے ہیں

    جیو : یہ بلیک واٹر کی سازش ہے

    ای ار وی :جب تک شریعت نافذ نہیں ہوتی یہ ہوتا رہے گا

    دنیا :یہ رد عمل ہے

    آج : یہ ڈرون کا بدلہ ہے

    پھر سے مزاکرات مزاکرات کی باتیں ہونے لگیں

    آج جیسے غیر منتخب لوگوں کی عید ہو گئی ،اخبار اور ٹی وی پر ان ہی کے بیانات ،واہ کیا بات ہے .

    ——————————————————————————————————–

    مجلس شوریٰ بہت خوش ہے ،ووٹ سے تو حکومت میں نہ اسکے پر یہ سمجھتے ہیں کہ شاید جب سب تباہ ہو جائے گا تو لوگ انہیں ہی انے کی دعوت دینگے ،یہ دھماکے ان کے لیہ آکسیجن کا کام کرتے ہیں ،بیگناہوں کے خوں پر اپنی سیاست چپکا رہے ہیں .پر دیکھتے ہیں کب تک

  49. Double Standard of Iftikhar Ch. et al
    The Supreme Court has made public the verdict in petition filed by Kh. Haris against appointment of Mr. Irfan Qadir as Prosecutor General, NAB. The decision is in favour of the petitioner and Mr. Irfan Qadir has lost his job. The SC acted swiftly to decide a legal matter about a clause in NAB Ordinance.
    Let us see what actually is the law in this regard? The prosecutor General of The NAB is to be appointed for a period of three years (un-extendible). Mr. Irfan Qadir had completed a term of three years during previous regime. This time he had been given the job anew. It had nothing to do with the previous tenure. But the great interpreters of the laws have decided as if it were an extension.
    Now let us take another case. It relates to a constitutional matter. According to article 179 of the Constitution of Pakistan which reads, “A judge of the Supreme Court shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty five years, unless he sooner resigns or is removed from office in accordance with the Constitution.” We know that Khalil ur Rehman Ramday and Ghulam Rabbani have retired after completing 65 years of age but the two have been inducted as Ad Hoc Judges. The article 182 which deals with ad hoc judges reads, “ If at any time it is not possible for want of quorum of Judges of the Supreme Court to hold or continue any sitting of the Court, or for any other reason it is necessary to increase temporarily the number of Judges of the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice of Pakistan may, in writing,-
    (a) with the approval of the President, request any person who has held the office of a Judge of that Court and since whose ceasing to hold that office three years have not elapsed; or
    (b) with the approval of the President and with the consent of the Chief justice of a High Court, require a Judge of that Court qualified for appointment as a judge of the Supreme Court,
    to attend sittings of the Supreme Court as an ad hoc Judge for such period as may be necessary and while so attending an ad hoc Judge shall have the same power and jurisdiction as a Judge of the Supreme Court. Here it seems that the CJ has taken advantage of the term, “person who has held the office of a Judge of that Court” as a provision to appoint an overage person as ad hoc judge, but article 260 i.e. Interpretation makes no difference between a Judge and an Ad Hoc Judge,” “Judge” in relation to the Supreme Court or a High Court, includes the Chief Justice of the Court and also includes
    (a) in relation to the Supreme Court, a person who is acting as a Judge of the Court; and
    (b) in relation to the High Court, a person who is an Additional Judge of the Court”. If status of an ad hoc judge is the same as the permanent judge all the rules must apply including the age. In my opinion a person eligible for appointment as ad hoc judge would be a former judge who had resigned as a judge for any reason but is below 65 years.
    Comparing the appointment of Mr. Irfan Qadir with that of Khalil Ramday we simply say that the latter is also void. Isn’t it a display of double standard of Mr, Iftikhar Ch.
    There is still another point which raises objection over the attitude of the SC. Appointment of an official to a certain department is a trivial matter and it may be ignored. The Court still took up the matter swiftly and heard the parties summarily and gave its verdict. There is a case in SC which questions the validity of membership of The CM Punjab in the provincial assembly. As compared to the case of Irfan Qadir this case has a constitutional anomaly under article 224. The petition filed by Mr. Shahid Orakzai has been dumped in the cold storage of SC along with the petition of Mr. Asghar Khan which not seen light of the for the last 11 years. It is high time senior lawyers like Mr. Kurd and Aitizaz Ahsan prevail upon the SC to be sane and impart justice without prejudice.

  50. What can Federal Ministers gain by killing Khawaja Sharif?
    Ansar Abbasi has again come out with an innovative theory. According to his story attributed to a purported report of Special Branch of Punjab police, some federal Ministers are planning to kill Mr. Khawaja Sharif. He has not disclosed names of the ministers with a foolish argument that it will be of no use. In my opinion, as he has come up with “solid” evidence of alleged maneuvering by the ministers the agencies would investigate without any hush up business. All that he has come out is an attempt to malign Federal Government. This is another ploy of Ansar Abbasi to malign Mr. Zardari because it would definitely end at Presidency.
    Let us examine the motives as pointed out by the so called investigative journalist. All of the reasons given are just illogical. Khawaja Sharif will retire in December 2010. There is no high profile case before the LHC CJ which may become threat to the Federal Government and the next three months will inshallah pass peacefully. This time frame is not a secret and all know this very well. Hence to kill in order to get rid of Khawaja is absolutely illogical. The next two reasons are even more absurd. There have been mega blunders on part of Punjab Govt. but the judiciary is mum. Khawaja himself has spoken foolish a number of times but Supreme Court didn’t take any notice. There have been numerous transfers within Punjab administration which were questionable but again SC remained unmoved. Then how can it show any muscle if Kh. Is killed. There have been cases of kliing of Judges in the past. Two are quite famous. One is that of Nabi Sher Junejo and the other Arif Hussain Bhatti. Both were killed during NAwaz Sharif Govt. Did the judiciary take stand against the provincial or federal govt. at that time?
    The last point is quite funny. The federal Govt. will never impose Governor Rule due to the last experience. Even if there is any thought of such an action the federal govt. may act even act on the pretext that CM Punjab is not a member of Punjab assembly in accordance with Article 224 of The Constitution of Pakistan.
    I suggest that shameless Ansar Abbasi be booked for creating anarchy through his conspiracy theories so that political instability vanishes from this country and the rulers take on the real issues seriously.

  51. Immunity of The President will be decided by the Court. Nawaz Sharif
    Mr. Nawaz Sharif has uttered these words in the midst of Govt./Judiciary fall out. His IQ seems to be too low for a leader. He has always been dictated by others. But it is our bad luck that he has remained PM twice. From the start of the present phase of democracy with the returning of BB and Mian Bros. he has been in the forefront of conspiracy against PPP. He has assisted the govt. in solving the problems of the masses. His no-opposition of Gillani would not stop his election as PM. NS opposed Zardari in presidential election but Zardari won with 2/3 majority. Now that his deal with KSA is coming to an eng so his dream of becoming PM for the third time has surfaced.
    I want to question the intellect of the former PM. The immunity to a president has been guaranteed by the constitution. He does not need ratification by any one may it be SCP. If a president needs SCP ratification for his rights or powers what about other institutions or officials. Did NS go to SCP for exercising his powers after he became CM Punjab, or after he became PM. He still laments that he had used his constitutional power when he dismissed Parvez Musharraf. Had he asked the CJ of SCP to interpret his powers to take that action. No. he didn’t. Immunity from being dragged into courts is the Prime right of the President.
    Nawaz Sharif is a liar and sycophant. He would do the same with BB had she survived and become PM again. He himself is the biggest beneficiary of BB’s assassination. Tracing the history from 1988 he has always used negative tactics to eliminate BB from politics but he did not succeed. According to Mr. Khalid Khawaja who was killed by “Asian Tigers” [ I may recall here that Nawaz Sharif had many times expressed his RESOLVE to make Pakistan AN ASIAN TIGER] Nawaz Sharif once tried to assassinate Benazir Bhutto through Ramzi Yousuf . Ramzi did try to kill Benazir on 26 July 1993 prior to 1993 elections. Now with BB killed Nawaz Sharif is trying to create circumstances for midterm elections.

  52. Solution to Terrorism
    by Moulana Wahidudin Khan (a former JI Member)

    Solution to Terrorism

    http://cpsglobal.org/content/solution-terrorism

    People the world over are trying to find a solution to terrorism. The authorities are trying to crush the terror menace through legal action; western powers are trying to crush it through warfare; while the reformers are trying to curb it by engaging in condemnation. However these methods are, apparently, proving ineffective. Then what is the solution to terrorism?

    According to Maulana Wahiduddin Khan, the present problem of terrorism is based on an ideology and an ideology cannot be countered or killed through legal action or by mere condemnation. We have to develop a counter-ideology to overcome it.

    According to UNESCO, “Violence begins from the mind”. It must, therefore, be uprooted from the mind itself. This goes directly to the root cause of terrorism. Therefore, in order to eliminate this root cause we need to initiate our efforts by beginning from the right starting point. And this starting point is the re-engineering of minds of individuals by taking them away from the culture of violence and bringing them closer to the culture of peace.

    In order to explain the importance of the above, let us state two parallel examples from history. One pertains to the American campaign against Communist Russia and the other refers to the American campaign against Saddam-led Iraq. Both Communist Russia and Iraq were declared enemies of the United States of America, but while the US was successful in curbing the menace of Communist Russia, the same America failed to cope with the menace of Saddam-led Iraq. The reason behind this difference was that America met the Russian challenge at an ideological level, while it opted for military action against Saddam’s Iraq.

    According to Maulana Sahab, terrorism will persist in one form or another until the ideology of violence is countered with another ideology based on peace.

    The Ideology of Violence

    The ideology behind present-day terrorism is that, Islam being a political system, it is the duty of all Muslims to establish Islamic rule in the world. This thinking was not prevalent during the time of the Prophet Muhammad. It is a later innovation which was developed in the last few centuries by a handful of people. Having become widespread in the Muslim world today, it is leading to present-day violence.

    A large number of Muslims, and especially many easily influenced youth, have become obsessed with this ideology and are trying to establish the political rule of Islam, thinking it to be their ticket to paradise. Having failed to achieve this objective of establishing Islamic rule by the peaceful method, they have started resorting to suicide bombing, the idea being that if we cannot eliminate non-Islamic rule, then let us at least de-stabilize it and pave the way for Islamic rule.

    The Ideology of Peace

    Maulana Wahiduddin Khan, having studied Islam from its original sources—the Quran and Hadith—says with certainty that this political interpretation of Islam is an innovation and the real Islam, as followed by Prophet Muhammad and his early followers, is based upon peace, compassion and tolerance.

    Peace is not prevalent in the world as people the world over are acting intolerantly and indulging in acts of violence, saying, “Give us justice and peace will ensue”. But when people, ostensibly seeking justice, stoop to violence, peace can never prevail. Peace is always desirable for its own sake, and every other desirable state comes after peace, not along with it. So, the maxim to follow, when peace is the desired state, is:

    ‘Ignore the problems, avail of the opportunities.’

    Once people become tolerant and obtain peace for its own sake, what that actually does is open up opportunities—it creates favourable conditions, which enable people to strive for their ideals, eventually attaining justice and other constructive ends. This is the ideology of peace.

    By ignoring the problems and availing the opportunities, one can obtain all that he originally was asking for—just by being patient and tolerant. This happens due to the law of nature. When the individual refrains from making a controversial matter into one of prestige, this gives rise to serious thinking. This non-emotional thinking helps him to understand that if he were to walk out of the point of controversy he would find all other paths open to him.

    According to Maulana Wahiduddin Khan, this ideology of peace, based on the original sources of Islam, can counter the ideology of violence. The Prophet Muhammad provides a very clear historical example of this in his method of negotiating the Hudaybiyya peace treaty. On this occasion he brought matters to a successful conclusion by unilaterally accepting all the conditions of his opponents. In this peace treaty, the Prophet had not apparently received justice or his rights. But what was in effect a 10-year no-war pact, gave the Prophet an opportunity to work uninterruptedly on a constructive programme which would otherwise have been impossible. By means of this peaceful non-political programme, the Prophet and his companions were able to consolidate themselves so thoroughly that they had no need to wage war: they were able to take control of Makkah peacefully.

    From this example of Prophet, we can understand that there is no room for violence in Islam. The ideology of Islam banishes the notion that there can be anything acceptable about terrorism. Islam is a completely peaceful religion and the Islamic method is a completely peaceful method.

    Peace in Islam

    Because of the importance of peace, the Qur’an has clearly declared that no aggressive war is permitted in Islam. Muslims can engage themselves only in a defensive, not in an offensive war, irrespective of the circumstances (2:190). Similarly the Prophet Muhammad has observed:

    “God grants to gentleness (rifq) what He does not grant to violence (unf).

    (Sunah Abu Dawud 4/255)

    The Qur’an states ‘reconciliation is the best’ (4:128). The Qur’an has this to say of the mission of the Prophet Muhammad:

    “We have not sent you forth but as a mercy to mankind.” (21:107)

    No wonder, then, that the Prophet Muhammad so earnestly used to entreat his Lord in his daily prayer:

    “O God, You are the original source of Peace; from You is all Peace, and to You returns all Peace. So, make us live with Peace; and let us enter paradise: the House of Peace. Blessed be You, our Lord, to whom belongs all Majesty and Honour!”

    A Few Examples

    Japan is an excellent example of using the peaceful method. Japan’s industrial cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, were destroyed by the atom bombs in 1945. After the holocaust, Japan abandoned violence and adopted a peaceful course, which it termed as a reverse course for its national development. And as a result, within forty years, Japan rapidly became a great economic power of the world.

    We find another interesting example of a peaceful method in India. India’s freedom struggle was started in 1857. But, even after more than 60 years of sacrifice, the desired political goal remained a distant dream. Then, in 1920, Gandhi emerged as the leader of the freedom struggle. Taking a U-turn, he abandoned the violent method and opted for a peaceful course of action for the freedom movement.
    Things took a miraculous turn after that, with the British Empire becoming paralyzed: a non-violent Gandhi had taken away from the British any justification for the use of violence. The following anecdote is an apt illustration.

    When Gandhi launched his freedom movement in India by following a peaceful method instead of resorting to violent means, a British officer sent a telegram to his secretariat in these words:

    “Kindly wire instructions how to kill a tiger non-violently.”

    Therefore the success, which was not forthcoming, even after a long and violent struggle, was achieved by peaceful methods in a short period of time.

  53. SC takes Suo Moto on appointment of Kamran Lashari as CS Sindh.
    Mr. Kamran lashari was Chairman CDA and a piece of land was leased to Siza Food a franchise of Mc Donalds. On a petition from ex-Senator Saadia Abbasi SCP held the action of CDA unlawful. Mr. Lashari had been removed by that time. On orders of SCP a depatmental inquiry recommeded Mr. Lashari’s dismisaal from service.
    On September 7 as Mr. Lashari was posted as CS Sind SCP took a serious not of the development and admonished the Govt. resulting in denotification of his appointment. ………….The Law prevailed.
    Let us now take another case. A Special Judge while in a high Court decides a case in 2000 against a former PM. A division bench of the same court on appeal uphelds the verdict. After a lapse of EIGHT YEARS the man goes to the SCP. The SCP sets aside the requirement of ONE MONTH time for appeal and reverts the decision. Five Judges of The Supreme Court of Pakistan gave a dozen of reasons to support their decision against verdict of the trial court and susequent Division Bench. The five learned judges of SCP were unanimous that the trial judge had not met necessary requirement of the law.
    Within two months of the above mentioned SCP decision throwing away the previous judgement of the trial judge, the same trial judge Mr. Rahmat Hussain Jafri was elevated to the SCP by no other than our candid Chief Justice of Pakistan. I wonder what is the basis of elevation of a judge from a high court to the apex court if even a judge leaving so many lacuna in his decision is promoted.

  54. Legal intellect of a Supreme Court Judge
    The other day the reknowned son of the Chief Justice was intercepted while speeding @87 Km/h on maximum speed limit of 70 km/h. The chap was challaned and he wholeheartedly accepted it. A good omen it was. The very next day during a court proceedings one of the judges sitting beside the father of the chap paid complements to the chap by saying “KAL JO KUCH HUA WOH QANOON KI HUKMIRANO NAHEEN BALKEH QANOON KA EHTERAM THA”. What a legal itellect from the judge of the apex court. If we examine the case academically, the judge was absolutely wrong. The Chap did not respect (EHTERAM) the Law but the law prevailed (HUKMIRANI).
    isnt it bad luck that people with such low sense of law are working as judges

  55. LUBP; It may not ne your domain it is quite relevant in the present circumstances to keep reders upto date
    Stuxnet Computer Virus Attacks Iran’s Bushehr Nuclear Plant
    Posted by John J. Xenakis Sep 27th 2010 at 8:35 am in Iran, Israel | Comments (60)
    A major computer virus attack has spread to the Windows computers at Iran’s Bushehr nuclear power plant, according to the Telegraph. However, the project manager at Bushehr said that the major systems at the plant have not been damaged.

    Iran’s Bushehr nuclear power plant
    Stuxnet is not an ordinary, garden variety computer virus, like the ones that erase your hard drives, steal your bank accounts, or send your browsers to porn sites.
    In fact, experts aren’t completely sure what it is, or what it’s trying to do. One thing they’re sure of: This virus wasn’t concocted by some hacker sitting at a computer in his basement. This virus MUST have been created by some government or government-level group, using a well-financed highly organized team of programmers, with access to plenty of specialized resources.
    This conclusion is reached because of the complexity and large numbers of components in the virus, and because it makes use of stolen encryption certificates and secret technical information that would be available only to high-level intelligence agencies.
    Thus, it appears that Stuxnet was designed by one nation to target facilities in another nation, as a kind of guided missile. It’s not known which two nations are involved, but the unconfirmed speculation is that the virus was designed by Israel to target Iran.
    Here’s what is known. Stuxnet has spread virally, around the world. And like any ordinary virus, it installs itself in Windows computers as a so-called “rootkit.” Once a virus gets installed in that way, it can do pretty much anything it wants to your computer, and is completely invisible to the computer operator. But Stuxnet doesn’t harm most computers.
    Stuxnet then searches your computer for a certain kind of software — industrial control software (ICS) that’s used in pipelines or factories or chemical or power plants, according to Symantec.
    If this kind of ICS software is on your computer, it then looks to see what kind of factory or plant the software is controlling.
    Large factories and plants of this kind are generally not controlled directly by Windows computers. Instead, each device in the plant has its own computer that runs a special kind of software program known as a “programmable logic controller” (PLC). So, the Stuxnet virus looks for Windows software that’s communicating with a device running a PLC — specifically, certain kinds of PLCs made by the giant German company Siemens AG.
    Finally, once the virus identifies the right kind of factory or plant, it installs yet another virus into the plant’s PLC software. From that point on, the attacker can invisibly control the entire plant or factory.
    Whether the target is Bushehr is just a guess. Experts have attempted to reverse engineer the virus to determine what it’s doing, but these attempts have been only partially successful. All that’s known is that the virus is targeting one or more factories or power plants or pipelines or similar installations that satisfy certain unknown parameters.
    Once it finds its target (or targets), it’s expected to issue a series of commands that will destroy the plant, according to PC World. This might happen, for example, by making the plant overheat, by making crucial machinery suddenly spin rapidly out of control, or by making dangerous chemicals get dispersed.
    The larger picture here is that this is a new kind of warfare — cyber warfare — that will become increasingly prevalent. The military is now treating cyber as the “fifth domain,” after the other domains — land, sea, air and space. The bad news is that very few people in the U.S. military are trained to deal with this kind of warfare, but the good news is that the same is true of other countries.
    So expect to see stories of this type more frequently. Inasmuch as a virus of this type can effectively destroy an entire factory or power plant, the results could be as spectacular as the detonation of a bomb. And there would be no trace of the bomber, or any way to find out who it is. There may yet be such an outcome from the Stuxnet virus. No one knows.
    For the individual Windows computer user, there are a few lessons to be learned here. First, make sure that you subscribe to a computer anti-virus service. Second, make sure that you turn on the option that automatically installs all the regular Windows updates from Microsoft. The Stuxnet virus is able to infect computers because of vulnerabilities in Windows software that the automatic updates are now repairing.

  56. A rare example of respecting oath of a judge and love of doing justice by the Supreme Court of Pakistan
    On the last day of hearing on 18th amendment, a number of Judges in the bench expressed their love of their oath on the constitution of Pakistan. Let us take an example to judge their commitment with the Constitution.
    Mr. Shahid Orakzai a journalist/lawyer has been knocking at the doors of our independent judiciary. Unfortunately he has chosen a wrong respondent. Had the respondent been Zardari Mr. Orakzai would have won the case. But the respondent is Shahbaz Sharif and hence the case is lingering on and on. The case involves a very serious matter i.e “is Shahbaz Sharif a member of Punjab Assembly or not?” The matter is to be view under article 223 of the Constitution of Pakistan. Let us first read the said article
    “ 223. Bar against double membership.
    (1) No person shall, at the same time, be a member of,
    (a) both Houses; or
    (b) a House and a Provincial Assembly; or
    (c) the Assemblies of two or more Provinces; or
    (d) a House or a Provincial Assembly in respect of more than one seat.
    (2) Nothing in clause (1) shall prevent a person from being a candidate for two or more seats at the same time, whether in the same body or in different bodies, but if he is elected to more than one seat he shall, within a period of thirty days after the declaration of the result for the last such seat, resign all but one of his seats, and if he does not so resign, all the seats to which he has been elected shall become vacant at the expiration of the said period of thirty days except the seat to which he has been elected last or, if he has been elected to more than one seat on the same day, the seat for election to which his nomination was filed last.
    Explanation:- In this clause, “body” means either House or a Provincial Assembly.
    (3) A person to whom clause (2) applies shall not take a seat in either House or the Provincial Assembly to which he has been elected until he has resigned all but one of his seats.
    (4) Subject to clause (2), if a member of either House or of a Provincial Assembly becomes a candidate for a second seat which, in accordance with clause (1), he may not hold concurrently with his first seat, then his first seat shall become vacant as soon as he is elected to the second seat.”

    Mr. Shahid Orakzai has taken the plea that Mr. Shahbaz Sharif had been a member of Punjab Assembly from PP-42 ( Bhakkar ). He further contested on PP-10 and again won that seat as well. In accordance with article 223 as soon as result on PP-10 was announced Mr. Shahbaz Sharif ceased to be member from PP-42. Afterwards Shahbaz Sharif decided to resign from PP-10 and so he is no more member of Punjab Assembly. The case was being heard by a division bench of Supreme Court under Mr. Javed Iqbal JJ. But the hearing has been put of sine die.
    Let us now examine the case on the basis of facts. I hereby reproduce the relevant notification of The Election Commission of Pakistan about PP-10. Viewing these notifications, I am of the opinion that it is an open n shut case which does not require any interpretation from the judges.
    Following are the notifications
    ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN
    ********
    PRESS RELEASE

    Islamabad the 3rd June, 2008.- The Chief Election Commissioner of Pakistan has published the name of the candidate returned to the Provincial Assembly of Punjab as a result of un-contested Bye-Election from the under mentioned Constituency :

    No. and Name of Constituency Name Father’s Name Address
    1 2 3 4

    PP-48 Bhakkar-II Mian Muhammad Shahbaz Sharif Mian Muhammad Sharif 180-181-H Model Town, Lahore.
    ________________________________________
    ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN
    ********
    PRESS RELEASE

    Islamabad the 21st June, 2008.- The Chief Election Commissioner of Pakistan has published the name of the candidate returned to the Provincial Assembly of the Punjab as a result of Un-contested Bye-Election from the under mentioned Constituency:
    No. and Name of Constituency Name Father’s Name Address
    1 2 3 4

    PP-10
    Rawalpindi-X Mian Muhammad Shahbaz Sharif Mian Muhammad Sharif 180-181-H
    Model Town, Lahore.
    ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN
    ********
    PRESS RELEASE

    Islamabad, the 4th July, 2008.- The Chief Election Commissioner has called upon the electors of the Constituency No. PP-10 Rawalpindi-X of Provincial Assembly of the Punjab, to elect a Member to fill the seat from the said Constituency, which has become vacant due to the resignation tendered by Mian Muhammad Shahbaz Sharif, Member of the Provincial Assembly, Punjab and specifies in relation thereto, the following dates for Bye-Election:

    PROGRAMME

    Sl.No. EVENTS DATE

    (1) Dates for filing of nomination papers with the Returning Officer by the candidates
    07-7-2008
    to
    12-7-2008

    (2) Dates for Scrutiny of nomination papers by the Returning Officer 14-7-2008
    to
    16-7-2008

    (3) Last date for filing of appeals against decisions of the Returning Officer rejecting/accepting the nomination papers

    19-7-2008

    (4)
    Last date for deciding appeals by the Tribunal
    24-7-2008
    (5)
    Last date for withdrawal of candidature
    25-7-2008
    (6)
    Publication of revised list of candidates
    26-7-2008
    (7)
    Polling day
    11-8-2008

    ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN
    ********
    PRESS RELEASE

    Islamabad the 16th August, 2008 :- The Chief Election Commissioner of Pakistan has published the name of the candidate returned to the Provincial Assembly of the Punjab as a result of Bye-Election from the under mentioned Constituency:

    No. and Name of Constituency Name Father’s Name Address
    1 2 3 4

    PP-10 Rawalpindi –X Malik Iftikhar Ahmed Malik Ghulam Sarwar H. No. 534, Main Baazar Mohallah Nasirabad, Rawalpindi.

    2. The result shall be subject to the final decision of Writ Petitions No. 9255/2008, 9254/2008, 7606/2008, 7606/2008 titled “Shahid Orakzai Vs Kanwar Muhammad Dilshad etc.”
    These notifications clearly show that Shahbaz Sharif had contested the election on PP-10 while he was already member of the assembly from PP-42 and the notification of his winning PP-10 was issued on June 21, 2008 and in accordance with article 223, PP-42 fell vacant. His choice of retaining PP-42 is unconstitutional.
    I wonder what the Independent Judiciary is doing in the case. Have they forgotten their oath of safeguarding the constitution?

  57. Another glaring example of OATH LOVING Supreme Court Judges
    In recent past The SCP ordered demolishing all high rise illegal buildings in the Punjab. A drive against such buildings was started and a number of Plazas were demolished. During the campaign an illegal plaza was found belonging to THE HONOURABLE LAW MINISTER of The Punjab. THe oppsition made a lot of noise. After much hue and cry a commitee under the opposition leader in Punjab Assembly was formed to investigate the matter. let us see what media told about the said plaza

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_TytH-gmys

    Turfa tamasha yeh hai Keh not a single sitting has yet been done by the said committee because the matter has been SUBJUDICED. To save skin of THE BLUE EYED BOY of the Khadim e aala Punjab a Supreme Court Judge (Mr. Javed Iqbal……. Shahid Orakzai case fame) took suo moto action on the matter capturing all the record available. Not a single hearing has so far taken place.

  58. The Responsibilities and Powers of Supreme Court of Pakistan
    The SCP draws its powers and responsibilities from the chapter JUDICATURE of The Constitution of Pakistan. Let us see what this chapter say
    Part VII: The Judicature [Articles 175-212B]
    Chapter 1: The Courts [Article 175]
    Chapter 2: The Supreme Court of Pakistan [Articles 176-191]

    I wonder the most trumpetted expression “Interpretation of The Constitution is the responsibility (some even replace resposibility with RIGHT) of Supreme Court” is nowhere foundf in the Constitution.
    Then the clause 190 simply says ” All executive and judicial authorities through out Pakistan shall act in aid of the Supreme Court.”. This article is given the wildest implication ” The order of Supreme Court or even a single judge is binding on all citizens without any exception”. Both of the above myths seem to be extra-constitutional.
    The myth that interpretation of Constitution is the sole responsibility of the supreme court has been a dirty spot on our society. Being exta-constitutional it is used by the judges with malfide intentions and mostly results in creating anarchy and instability. The judges use this as a weapon against the executive authority and often rewrite the constitution in guise of interpretation. Aljihad trust case is the most conspicuous example of overstepping the powers by the court.
    A few days back the SCP ruled appointment of Prosecuter General NAB as void on the grounds that the tenure of the post is “THREE YEARS NOTEXTENDIBLE” as given in the NAB oridinance. This ruling is absolutely unlawful and against the facts. The appointment of Mr. Irfan Qadir was not a matter of extension by any logic. It had nothing to do with his previous tenure.
    At the same time The Constitution of Pakistan says “A Judge of the Supreme Court shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty-five years, unless he sooner resigns or is removed from office in accordance with the Constitution”. We daily see The Lord Chief Justice sitting between two people who have crossed this limit of age. This is an example of double standard of our lordships.
    I hereby refer the SCP report 2004 compiled by the then Chief Justice
    http://www.ljcp.gov.pk/…/Reports%20of%20the%20LJCP/reports/AnnualReport2004.pdf
    even in this report thereis no mention of resposibility of interpretation or orders being binding on all.

  59. Shahbaz warns of long march on NAB chief appointment
    LAHORE: Chief Minister Punjab Shahbaz Sharif on Sunday warned the federal government of a long march against the latter’s “obstinate behaviour” regarding the appointment of the chief of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), television reports said.

    “I have no personal grudge with the newly appointed NAB chairman Justice (Rtd) Deedar Hussain Shah, but here the matter is of accountability and justice,” he said.

    Shahbaz wondered how a loyalist of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) would act with regard to the Swiss cases against Asif Ali Zardari
    Mr. Shahbaz Sharif has come out of his skin by expressing his feelings about appointment of Mr. Deedar Hussain Shah as Chairman NAB.
    He has threatened the Federal Govt. of another Long March if Mr. Shah is not removed. The people of Pakistan have been suffering with numerous kinds of calamities one of them is Sharif Family itself. Shahbaz Sharif is questioning the integrity of Mr. Shah only because he has been a PPP MNA in the past. His unblemished record of imparting justice has not washed the “SCAR” he earned by being a PPP man. This statement of Shabaz Sharif reminds me of the elder brother’s famous words”my blood boils with the mere mention of PPP” It seems signing of COD by these hate carriers was a drama. If even a man who has remained CJ of a provincial court after relinquishing his political affiliations cannot wash his “sins” how can the arch enemy of Shaheed BB be considered to have forgotten his past feelings against BB.
    THe two brothers have benefitted a lot with the assassination of BB. The elder brother has gained the top slot in popularity. The party which was considered to be too weak to earn 25 NA seats in 2008 election actually won more than 80 seats after Mohtarma’s assassination.the same is true with Punjab assembly results. Had BB been alive these CIA agents could not muster enough seats in Punjab assembly to get even the leader of opposition.in that assembly.
    Considering the revelations of Khalid Khawaja about Nawaz hatching conspiracy to kill BB in 1993 before the then elections, his taking money from Osama bin laden to topple BB in 1990, Khalid Khawaja’s subsequent murder at the hand of an unknown group Asian Tiger and hencesuccessfully stopping him from further revelations,, his pressurising Malik Qayyum to convct BB in 1999, his love with Rana Maqbool who is accused of murder attempt on Mr. Zardari in Jail during his Premiership, shedding of crocodile tears outside RGH on 27 Dec. 2007 but not attending her funeral, letting the crowd cross Punjab Governer House wall while Zardari was inside may well be a basis of his implication in BB’s murder.

  60. http://jang.com.pk/jang/oct2010-daily/14-10-2010/col5.htm

    اب یہ میراثی حامد میر که رہا ہے کہ طالبان امریکی اجنٹ ہیں ،یہی حامد میر ہے جس کے پنجابی طالب عثمان پجابی سے تعلقات کوئی چھپی بات نہیں ،اگر یہ طالبان امریکی اجنٹ ہیں تو یہ طالب صحافی حامد میر کیوں ان سے مزاکرات کے لئے زور ڈالتا تھا ؟ کیوں آپریشن کی مخالفت کرتا تھا ؟ کیوں یہ کہتا تھا کے اچھے طالبان اور ہیں اور برے اور ؟ .کیا سوات کے طالبان بھی امریکی اجنٹ تھے جنھیں ساری مذہبی جماعتوں نے سپورٹ کیا ؟ .تو کیا سرے دیوبند علما جو طالبان کو اپنا ساتھی سمجھتے ہیں امریکی اجنٹ ہیں ؟ .اگر سب امریکی اجنٹ ہیں تو پھر ان سے لڑنے میں کترانا کیسا ؟
    اصل میں طالبان کو بہت نقصان ہو رہا ہے اور طالبان صحافی شدید غم کی حالت میں ان کے بچاؤ کی ہر ممکن کوشش کر رہے ہیں اور کرتے رہے ہیں .جب طالبان تھوڑی طاقت دکھاتے ہیں تو یہ ان کے ساتھ ہو جاتے ہیں اور جب لوگوں میں ان کے لیہ نفرت ہوتی ہے تو یہ ان کو امریکی اجنٹ که دیتے ہیں تاکہ طالبان پر دباؤ کم ہو جائے اور لوگ حکومت پر دباؤ ڈالیں
    حامد میر کے نزدیک اب بیت الله محسود امریکی اجنٹ ہو گیا جس کو ملا عمر نے پاکستان میں اپنا نائب بنایا تھا تو کیا ملا عمر اجنٹ نہیں ؟ وہ کیسے “اچھا طالبان ” ہے ؟ پاکستان میں جو ہزاروں قتل ہوئے ان سب کا تعلق طالبان ہی سے ہے پر جب ان کی موت اتی ہے تو یہ صحافی طالبان ان کو امریکی اجنٹ بنادیتے ہیں اور جب انہیں کوئی کامیابی ہوتی ہے تو مجاہد بنا دیتے ہیں .الله کرے یہ امیر قاتلین ملا عمر اور اسامہ جلد ہی ہلاک ہوں کیوں کہ آج یہ ان کے مجھاہد ہیں پر مرنے کہ بعد امریکی اجنٹ بنیں گے اور ان کی منافقت اور کمینے پن کی صحافت چلتی رہے گی .
    ویسے کمینہ پن اور مکاری دل کی ہوتی ہے پر انسان اگر بہت کی مکار ،ذلیل اور کمینہ ہو تو یہ اعمال اس کی شکل پر بھی آجاتے ہیں .حامد میر ایسی ہی ایک

  61. Ansar again at HIS BEST

    Benazir, Musharraf joined hands to keep Nawaz out
    This is the latest from from Ansar Abbasi’s bag. He has referred Shaikh Rashid for this revelation. These ten points are so ridiculus that I have doubts on his IQ. There is no doubt that BB wanted to get FABRICATED cases against her dropped and I think it was her RIGHT. All points from 1 to 6 are of common cause except of course the withdrawal of cases specifically pertaining to BB.
    Point No. pertains both for BB and NS. Both had been PM twice. How could continuity of “BAR ON THIRD TIME” block PML-N and not the PPP from making the next Govt. because it applied to both BB and NS. Ansar Abbasi does not tell the nation what magic the PML-N-MMA could do if the bar would have been removed before elections.
    Point No. 8 relates to ammendment President Powers which all parties wanted.
    Point No. 10 says” As per existing agreement, BB will return to Pakistan by the end of the year, however, if NS makes an early return, she too will be welcomed “.
    This points threatens the IQ of Ansar Abbasi read carefully BB’s return was made conditional i.e “if NS returns”. It means BB would return after NS. This point makes the so called agreement as between Musharraf and NS instead of between Musharraf and BB.
    The alliance between PPP and PML-Q could not reach during the whole tenure of 2002 elections so this point is as ridiculus as all others.

  62. Dear Moderators,

    Kindly Remove my name “Research Specialist” from your website permanently.

    Thanking You and Wish you best of Luck

    Best Regards.

    Muhammad Aamir Mughal

  63. Mr. Asif Ali zardari has said that the courts have never impart justice to PPP
    I want to tell a gory tail of injustice to Mr. asif Zardari by the courts including the apex court and the present Chief Justice was one of those judges. It is the same SGS case which had been sent for retrial by a full bench of Supreme Court in 2001. I am hereby reproducing the verdict of the Supreme Court. The case was picked by TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL as an example of JUDICIAL CORRUPTION in a document “Cases and Materials Relating to Corruption Issue 3 – May 2003”.
    The link is: http://www.cvc.nic.in/Vol%201%20Issue%203%202003.pdf

    The Supreme Court of Pakistan is repeatedly asking the Govt. to write a letter withdrawing the previous one by Malik Qayyum in which he had told the Swiss authorities that Pakistan Govt. was not interested in continuation of investigation in SGS-Cotecna case. At that time the accused BB had already been killed and the other accused Mr. Asif Ali Zardari was an ordinary man. He had not been President of Pakistan at that time. The Swiss authorities and the Swiss Department of Justice closed the case as decided “Withdrawn by the Prosecution”
    This case which continued in investigation phase for Nine Years in Geneva has a Pakistani version as well. This case was filed in Ehtesab Bench of Lahore High Court on 14 March, 1998. The reference was sent before a division bench at Lahore comprising Malik Mohammad Qayyum JJ and Najam Ul Hassan Kazmi JJ. The allegations on the accused Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto and Mr. Asif Ali Zardari was that they got kickbacks on awarding pre-shipment inspection contract to MS. SGS in 1994. After the objection from the accused on the bench in Lahore was sustained by SCP which ordered hearing at Rawalpindi instead of sending the reference to Rawapindi Ehtesab bench both the judges were assigned to take up the case at Rawalpindi with all TA/Da on each hearing. The bench headed by Malik Qayyum announced its verdict on 15 April 1999 and sentenced both the accused to five years imprisonment, a fine of $ 8.6 Million to each and disqualified them from holding public office.
    Appeal against the verdict was filed in the Supreme Court. Appeal of BB was not entertained by the Supreme Court redistrar on the plea that BB had not surrendered herself. On a short order from a Judge that if sentence count be awarded in the absence of BB why not her appeal be entertained. The appellants had taken the plea that
    i. the senior judge was biased against them
    ii. the trial was conducted in a hostile atmosphere
    iii. the sewnior judge had close links with the then PM
    iv. a number of defence witnesses were not allowed to give their statements.
    v. BB’s statement was not recorded in violation of a Supreme Court order
    vi. Mr. Zardari wanted to cross examine a prosecution witness but was not allowed
    Many other loopholes were also pointed out and the accused requested for AQUITTAL.
    Judgement on the appeal has been taken from the above mentioned Transparency International report which is in PDF but I have converted it in MS word since the full document contains many other cases from across the world. Following is the text of the report pertaining to this case and has full text of the SCP judgement.

    The issue of judicial corruption arises in the case of Zardari and Bhutto v The State. Here the validity of the conviction of a former Pakistan Prime Minister and her spouse on corruption charges was in issue. The Supreme Court of Pakistan undertakes an exhaustive examination of the circumstances in which the decision of the lower court was reached and in particular examines the meaning and scope of judicial “bias”. As the Court notes (in para.29), the evidence:

    “not only goes a long way to suggest that Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J. [one of
    the two trial judges] had acquired a personal interest in the case by deriving an
    out of the way favour of the grant of diplomatic passports to him and his wife but
    also divulges a close liaison between the learned Judge, Senator Saifur Rehman
    and Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, the then Prime Minister whose political
    rivalry with Ms. Benazir Bhutto appellant is a matter of common knowledge”.
    The case also illustrates the danger of undue influence by a senior judge upon a fellow, more junior, judge. As the Supreme Court notes (in para.43)
    “It appears from the record that Malik Muhammad Qayyum J. being the senior member of the Bench had exerted his influence on the second member S. Najamul Hassan Kazmi J. who being an unconfirmed Judge of the Lahore High Court was sweating for confirmation”.
    Overall, the decision is a salutory reminder of the need for judges to observe the rules of natural justice and to maintain their independence and emphasises the importance of the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct, noted earlier in the Bulletin.
    Note: The Ehtesab (Accountability) Act assigns the responsibility of conducting an enquiry into corruption and corrupt practices to an Ehtesab (Accountability) Cell. This reports to the Chief Ehtesab (Accountability) Commissioner. A Reference against an accused is initiated by the Chief Ehtesab Commissioner.

    ZARDARI AND BHUTTO v THE STATE

    Supreme Court of Pakistan (Appellate Jurisdiction)
    Mr. Justice Muhammad Bashir Jehangiri.; Mr. Justice Sh. Riaz Ahmad; Mr. Justice Munir A. Sheikh; Mr. Justice Nazim Hussain Siddiqui; Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhary; Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Farooq; Mr. Justice Abdul Hameed Dogar.
    April 6th 2001
    The facts appear in paragraph 6 of the judgment

    Cases referred to:
    Anwar and Another v The Crown PLD 1955 FC 185
    Benazir Bhutto v. President of Pakistan and Another 1992 SCMR 140 Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto v. The State PLD 1999 SC 937
    Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto, Leader of the Opposition, Bilawal House, Clifton, Karachi,
    and another v. The State through Chief Ehtesab Commissioner, Islamabad 1999 SCMR
    759
    Mohtarama Benazir Bhutto, M.N.A, and another v. The State PLD 2000 SC 795 Khairdi Khan v Crown PLD 1953 FC 223
    Machia and 2 others v. The State PLD 1976 SC 695,
    Metropolitan Properties Co. (F.G.C.), Ltd. v. Lannon and Others [1968] 3 All ER 304 R v Sussex Justices, ex p. McCarthy [1923] 1 KB 256
    Shahadat Khan and another v Home Secretary to the Government of West Pakistan and others PLD 1969 SC 158
    For the Appellants:
    Raja Muhammad Anwar, Sr.ASC
    Sardar Muhammad Latif Khosa, Sr. ASC
    Mr. Aitzaz Ahsan, Sr.ASC
    For the respondent/State:
    Mr M Zahoorul Haq, ASC
    Mr Ali Sabtain Fazli, ASC
    Ch. Fazal-I-Hussain, AOR
    For the Federation of Pakistan:
    Attorney General of Pakistan

    MUHAMMAD BASHIR JEHANGIRI, J. (gave the judgment of the Court)
    1. This judgment will dispose of Criminal Appeals bearing No.102 and 127 of 1999, both of which are directed against the judgment dated 15th April, 1999 of a learned Division Bench of the Lahore High Court.
    2. The appeals were heard by a larger Bench of seven Judges with effect from 26th
    February to 3rd April, 2001. The two appellants were tried by the learned Ehtesab Bench
    of Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, on its original side on receipt of Ehtesab
    Reference No. 30 of 1998 from the then learned Chief Ehtesab Commissioner filed
    under section 15(1) of the Ehtesab Act (IX of 1997) (hereinafter referred to as the Act)
    against as many as 12 accused including the two convict-appellants before us.

    3. Facts of the case, according to the prosecution, are that by his letter dated 14th
    March, 1998 the Chief Ehtesab Commissioner made a Reference under section 15 of
    the Act to the Lahore High Court, Lahore. This Reference was registered as ER
    No.30/98. The learned Chief Justice of Lahore High Court constituted a Bench

    comprising Malik Muhammad Qayyum and Syed Najam-ul-Hassan Kazmi, JJ. in terms
    of section 2(f) read with section 10 of the Act. The Reference comprised the letter
    referred to above and the interim report referred to in paragraph 13 thereof. The gist of
    the allegations as set out in the Reference were that Ms. Benazir Bhutto, ex-Prime
    Minister of Pakistan, Asif Ali Zardari, ex-Federal Minister/ Ms. Benazir Bhutto’s spouse,
    appellants and A.R.Siddiqui, ex-Chairman, CBR by abusing their authority as holders of
    public office in collusion with each other and with M/s Societe General De Surveillance
    SA (“SGS”) as well as Jens Schlegelmilch, and Directors of M/s. SGS awarded a
    contract for pre-shipment inspection to M/s SGS. This had allegedly been done for
    illegal gratification in the form of kickbacks and commissions resulting in loss to the
    public revenue. The Reference also set out the various dates on which various alleged
    events took place. It was supported by an interim report in the form of a Reference
    spreading over pages 1-257 which had been submitted by the Ehtesab Bureau to the
    Chief Ehtesab Commissioner under section 15(6) of the Act. The reference made by the
    Chief Ehtesab Commissioner alleged commission of offences of corruption and corrupt
    practices within the meanings of section 3 read with section 4(2) of the Act.

    4. Having taken cognizance of the offences under the Act alleged to have been committed, the Bench finding that there were sufficient grounds for proceeding with the case, issued summonses to the persons named as the appellants in the Reference. It may be mentioned here that at a later stage, the Chief Ehtesab Commissioner also forwarded a supplementary Reference on 20th August, 1998, in which another person, Hans Fischer, was added as an accused.
    Supplementary Reference.
    5. According to Mr. Abdul Hafeez Pirzada, learned Sr.ASC for Asif Ali Zardari appellant,
    a Supplementary Reference under section 15(1) of the Act was “purportedly filed by the
    Chief Ehtesab Commissioner before the learned Ehtesab Bench, Lahore High Court,
    against the appellant on 20th August, 1998”. In the said Reference the name of Hans
    Fischer, Vice President of SGS, was added as an accused person and it was alleged
    that as a result of a further probe in the on-going investigation, additional cogent
    material and documentary evidence had been collected against the accused persons,
    mostly through the Swiss authorities and certain documents were annexed thereto in
    which it was stated that at the request of the Government of Pakistan under the Protocol
    for Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, Judge Michelle, Canton of Geneva, ordered
    the seizure of the documents from the possession of SGS and Cotecna relating to the
    contract entered into with the Government of Pakistan and thereafter Judge Daniel
    Devaud vide order dated 24th June, 1998 ruled that the Islamic Republic of Pakistan be
    admitted as a damaged party. It was further alleged in the said Supplementary
    Reference that the judicial office of the Examining Magistrate in Switzerland after having
    inculpated the appellants, issued an International “Letter Rogatory“ which was handed
    over to the Ehtesab Bureau, Government of Pakistan by the Swiss Embassy in Pakistan
    through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for service on the appellants who refused to
    accept the same. It was also stated in the Supplementary Reference that “the
    documents received from the Swiss authorities further revealed that subsequent to the
    issuance of a letter dated 29th June, 1994 by Cotecna, whereby they had promised to
    pay 6% of the receipts from the Government of Pakistan to Mariston Securities Inc, the name of Bomer Finance Inc was substituted on 24th May, 1995, thereby indicating that the said 6% would be paid to Bomer Finance Inc and not Mariston Securities Inc. It is further alleged that Jens Schlegelmilch, one of the accused, visited Pakistan and stayed as a guest of the then Prime Minister on various occasions which fact established his relationship with the then Prime Minister and Asif Ali Zardari.

    Short Order
    6. The short order dated 15th April, 1999 convicting the appellants is reproduced
    hereunder:-
    The Chief Ehtesab Commissioner has referred to this Court under
    section 15(1) of the Ehtesab Act, 1997 the above Reference against
    Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto, former Prime Minister of Pakistan and a
    Member of the National Assembly and her husband Senator Asif Ali
    Zardari for trial under sections 3 and 4 of the Ehtesab Act, 1997. After
    summoning the accused, we framed the following charges against
    them:
    Charges against Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto
    “You as Prime Minister of Pakistan from 16.11.1993 to 5.11.1996 along
    with your spouse Asif Ali Zardari in exercise of your official functions
    and by abuse of your position as a holder of public office as defined in
    sub-para (ii) of section 2 of the Act, with the abetment, assistance and
    aid of other co-accused dishonestly and through corrupt and illegal
    means ordered the grant of a ‘pre-shipment inspection contract’ dated
    29-9-1994 to M/s Societe Generale De Surveillance (SGS) in
    consideration of illegal gratification, pecuniary advantages, commission and kick-backs, earlier agreed upon which were paid by SGS and contained and received in Bank accounts of off-shore companies operated by Jens Schlegelmilch namely Bomer Finance Inc., Mariston Securities Inc. and Nassam Overseas Inc. of which you and your spouse and others are beneficiaries.
    Your above acts constitute the offence of corruption and corrupt
    practices under section 3(1)(a), 3(1)(d) and 4(2) of the Act which is
    triable by this Court, we hereby direct that you be tried on the said
    charges.”
    Charges Against Asif Ali Zardari Accused No.2
    “You as a holder of public office as defined in sub-para (ii) of section 2
    of the Act along with your spouse Ms.Benazir Bhutto in exercise of your
    official functions and by abuse of your position as a holder of public
    office, with the abetment, assistance and aid of others, dishonestly and
    through corrupt and illegal means secured the award of pre-shipment
    inspection contract dated 29.9.1994 for M/s Societe Generale De

    Surveillance S.A, (SGS) in consideration of illegal gratification,
    pecuniary advantages, commission and kick-backs, earlier agreed upon
    which were paid by SGS and were obtained and received in bank
    accounts of off-shore companies operated by Jens Schlegelmilch,
    namely, Bomer Finance Inc., Mariaton Securities Inc. and Nassam
    Overseas Inc. of which you and your spouse and other are beneficiaries.
    Your above acts constitute the offence of corruption and corrupt
    practices under section 3(1)(a), 3(1)(d) and 4(2) of the Act which is
    triable by us. We hereby direct that you be tried on the said charges”.
    In order to prove its case, the prosecution examined 16 witnesses and
    also produced 385 documents which were duly exhibited. In defence the
    only witness examined by Mr. Asif Ali Zardari was Mr. Nawaz Hussain,
    Superintendent Landhi Jail, Karachi as DW.1. We have heard the
    learned counsel for the parties at great length. For detailed reasons to
    be recorded later, we have reached the following conclusion:-

    i) That the evidence comprising of Pakistani documents, documents
    sent along with letter rogatory, as also documents sent by the Swiss
    Judge, Daniel Devaud, duly stamped and signed by him, are admissible
    in evidence being certified copies of public documents and have been
    duly proved;
    ii) That the pre-shipment inspection contract in question was awarded to
    M/s SGS by the former Prime Minister, Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto alone
    and the so-called presentation [to] the Committee set up by her was
    merely an eyewash at the behest of and in abetment with Mr. Asif Ali
    Zardari;

    iii) That the contract was awarded for the reason that M/s SGS had, on 11th March, 1994, promised to pay 6% (six percent) of the fee received by it to Bomer Finance Inc. Bomer Finance was a company wholly and beneficially owned by Mr. Asif Ali Zardari;
    iv) That the payment of kickbacks was made in the account of Bomer Finance Inc. which it was maintaining with Union Bank of Switzerland, Geneva, which bears the account No. 552343. In addition to Mr. Asif Ali Zardari, Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto also had access to this account and she had paid £92,000 out of the aforesaid account as the price payable in respect of the necklace purchased by her for £117,000;

    v) That this Court had validly appointed Mr. Moazzam Hayat, Registrar
    of this Court as a Commission in order to compare the certified copies
    procured in evidence by the prosecution with the documents in the

    original record, collected by Judge Daniel Devaud and also to verify the authentication of certified copies;
    vi) That the award of the contract resulted in the payment of US $137,492 million by the Government to M/s SGS which has further claimed US$13 million out of the above commission amounting to US$4.3 million was paid by SGS to Mr. Asif Ali Zardari of which Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto was also a beneficiary;

    vii) That the trial of the respondents is not hit by Article 12 of the
    Constitution which has no applicability to the facts of the case.
    It follows from the above that the prosecution has proved its case
    against Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto and Senator Asif Ali Zardari beyond
    any reasonable shadow of doubt. They are, therefore, guilty of having
    committed corruption and corrupt practices within the meaning of
    section 3 (1)(a), section 3(1)(d) and section 4(2) of the Ehtesab Act,
    1997.
    Accordingly, Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto and Senator Asif Ali Zardari are
    convicted and sentenced to undergo 5 years imprisonment each and to
    pay a fine of US$8.6 million or equivalent amount in the Pakistani
    currency. They are further disqualified under section 9 of the Ehtesab
    Act, 1997 from holding any public office. Their property shall also be
    confiscated.

    Evidence
    7. In this case the prosecution in order to bring home charges to the appellants placed reliance on [the evidence of a series of witnesses and documentary evidence] ….
    8. Hassan Waseem Afzal (PW14) was appointed as Joint Secretary in Ehtesab Bureau
    on 9th April 1997 and was a member of the Ehtesab Bureau, Islamabad. During the
    course of his duty, various matters relating to corruption and corrupt practices came to
    his notice including matters relating to Ms. Benazir Bhutto, Asif Ali Zardari appellants
    and some of the bureaucrats and tax-evaders. According to him, the Ehtesab
    Reference in which the two appellants were involved was sent to the Chief Ehtesab
    Commissioner by the Ehtesab Bureau. He also coordinated and assisted the
    prosecution in the preparation of these cases particularly relating to the overseas
    aspect. In September, 1997, according to Hassan Waseem Afzal, the Attorney General
    for Pakistan had contacted Mr. Beat Frey, the Chief of Swiss Police, under
    international mutual legal assistance arrangements, seeking assistance relating to the
    detection of corruption and corrupt practices and in that process he had obtained
    certified copies of the documents from the Swiss Police. According to Hassan Waseem
    Afzal, the original documents were produced before another Ehtesab Bench (ER 26 of
    1998) comprising of Ehsanul Haq Chaudhary and Raja Muhammad Khurshid, JJ. In this process, the Attorney General for Pakistan, added Hassan Waseem Afzal as a
    witness [and] obtained attested copies of documents from his office. Hassan Waseem
    Afzal also stated that he appeared before the Ehtesab Bench comprising of Ishan ul
    Haq Chaudhary and Raja Muhammad Khurshid, JJ and submitted the documents to
    the Bench and then obtained copies thereof from the Lahore High Court and produced
    the same in this case as Ex.PW-14/1 to 152. He has also claimed to have visited
    Geneva as Coordinator of the affairs of the Ehtesab Bureau and met his lawyers in

    Geneva [and] that the Swiss Government had ordered the raids on the offices of Jens
    Schlegelmilch and Didier Plantim. According to him the same Judge had ordered the
    search of Offices of SGS and Cotecna and had summoned various bank managers,
    recorded their statements and took records into his possession. According to him while
    carrying on these proceedings, the Swiss Judge blocked the accounts of Ms. Benazir
    Bhutto and Asif Ali Zardari appellants and Ms. Nusrat Bhutto. Thereafter the said
    Judge pronounced indictment orders against the President of SGS Hens Fischer,
    President of Cotecna and then Jens Schlegelmilch, Asif Ali Zardari and Ms.Benazir
    Bhutto appellants. He produced these documents as Ex.PW-14/153 and 154. Hassan
    Waseem Afzal further stated that the Letter Rogatory was received through the
    diplomatic channel along with the documents Ex.P-14/155 to 319. According to him,
    during the coordination proceedings, he had learnt that 19 offshore companies had
    been established by the appellants. He further stated that he obtained the original
    documents which had been submitted in the Court of Ehtesab Bench comprising
    Ihsanul Haq Chaudhary and Raja Muhammad Khurshid, JJ and produced attested
    copies thereof as PW-14/320 to 338.
    9. Mr.Abdul Hafeez Pirzada, learned Sr. ASC representing Asif Ali Zardari, inter alia,
    contended that the learned Ehtesab Bench while recording the impugned judgment was
    completely biased, was the victim of malice, misconduct and had failed to observe
    procedural propriety. The learned counsel also pleaded that we should take judicial
    notice under Articles 111 and 112 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 of the press
    clipping dated 16th August, 1991 of the Daily “News” under the caption “PPP paving way
    for martial law” attributed to Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, the then Prime Minister of
    Pakistan. The excerpt from the press clipping aforesaid reads as under:

    “My blood boils when the name of PPP is mentioned to me and I
    feel like cutting it into pieces as this is the party responsible for the
    division of the country into two parts and now once again it is
    creating hurdles in the way of the country’s progress and
    development.”
    10. Learned counsel went on to say that “Saliva that dripped from the mouth of the man was law”.

    Contentions on the Question of Bias Raised on Behalf of the Appellants.
    11. The contentions of Mr. Abdul Hafeez Pirzada and Raja Muhammad Anwar, learned ASC for the appellants, primarily are as under:-

    a) That in Reference No. 26/1998 the learned Bench had
    ordered the freezing of all the assets, bank accounts and the
    properties of the two appellants situated inside and outside
    Pakistan, vide order dated 27th April, 1997. In this context, it
    was pointed out that Reference No. 26/98 appears to have
    been made over to the Bench headed by Malik Muhammad
    Qayyum J. temporarily for the sole purpose of securing the
    order of freezing of assets etc. and in lieu thereof diplomatic
    passports were granted to Malik Muhammad Qayyum J. and
    his wife, notwithstanding the serious objection raised by the
    Ministry of Foreign Affairs that the judges of the High Courts
    and the Supreme Court of Pakistan are not entitled to the
    grant of this category of passport. It was thus urged that the
    grant of diplomatic passports to Mr. Justice Malik
    Muhammad Qayyum and his wife was a favour and from that
    point of time onwards bias became evident on the part of
    Malik Muhammad Qayyum J.
    b) That on 28th September, 1998 the trial of the appellants from
    that of ten other co-accused was separated in order to use against the appellants the statement purportedly made by one of the co-accused, namely Jens Schlegelmilch, during the investigative process carried out in Geneva.
    c) That Reference No.30/98 was pending at the principal seat
    of the Lahore High Court from where it was transferred by
    the order of this Court dated 14th December, 1998 in the
    case reported as Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto, Leader of the
    Opposition, Bilawal House, Clifton, Karachi, and another v.
    The State through Chief Ehtesab Commissioner, Islamabad
    (1999 SCMR 759), to the Rawalpindi Bench where another
    Ehtesab Bench being seized of other Ehtesab References
    was available to hear this Reference also. Malik Muhammad
    Qayyum J. travelled all the way from Lahore to Rawalpindi
    which was described as the “chasing” of the above
    Reference filed against the appellants to achieve the desired
    result.
    d). That on 2nd April, 1999 this Court in the case of Mohtarma
    Benazir Bhutto v. The State (PLD 1999 SC 937 at page 989) authored by Irshad Hasan Khan, J. as his Lordship then was, held that “the controversy raised in these appeals, in substance revolves around the admissibility of the documents in dispute”. [He continued]

    “Without expressing any opinion on the above controversial
    issues, we are of the view that for doing complete justice
    between the parties and to avoid protracted litigation, it
    would be expedient if the Ehtesab Bench, before
    consideration of and placing reliance upon the report of the
    Commissioner, shall provide adequate opportunity to the
    parties to raise any objection against the report including the
    question of admissibility of the documents in dispute which
    were sent to Switzerland through the Commission for the
    purpose of verifying the genuineness and authenticity of the
    said documents, before finally disposing of the Reference,
    without prejudice to any observation made in the impugned
    order or the leave granting order and in the light of the
    judgments rendered by this Court in Mohtarma Benazir
    Bhutto v The State (Criminal Appeals Nos. 62 and 63 of
    1999) and Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto v. The State (Criminal
    Petition No.208/1998)”.

    12. It was further emphasized in the case of Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto (above) that
    “On conclusion of the defence evidence as aforesaid, the
    arguments on the main case as well as on the
    applications filed under section 265-K [Criminal Procedure
    Code] may be heard by the Hon Ehtesab Bench
    simultaneously. However, consideration of objections
    raised to the admissibility of documents by the appellants
    at the time of their production in evidence before the
    Court, [must] be attended to in precedence to other
    contentions in the case…”

    In consequence of the non-compliance of the above direction the appellants were deprived of a substantial right of appeal recognized in law.

    e) That the learned Ehtesab Bench directed Dr.Z.Babar Awan,
    learned ASC for Ms. Benazir Bhutto appellant to record his
    statement on behalf of Ms. Benazir Bhutto appellant on 22nd
    February, 1999 which he was reluctantly constrained to
    comply with. Ms. Benazir Bhutto, however, later submitted
    her statement in writing but it was spurned and not made
    part of the record.

    f) That on the same day i.e. on 22nd April, 1998 the statement
    of Mr. Ali Sabtain Fazli, the learned Special Public
    Prosecutor, closing his side was dictated by the Bench
    giving up important witnesses including V.A. Jafri, Talat Javed, Khalil Ahmad etc. and he was directed by the learned
    Bench to sign it, as owned by the learned Special Prosecutor
    himself in Court before us, with a view to conclude the trial at
    the earliest.

    g) That an application under section 476 Cr.P.C./195 PPC read
    with section 193 PPC was moved by Dr. Z. Babar Awan,
    learned counsel for Ms. Benazir Bhutto appellant for initiating
    action regarding fabrication of documents, wherein instead
    of requiring reply thereto and disposing it of, the learned
    Ehtesab Bench appointed Mr. Mozzam Hayat, the then
    Registrar, Lahore High Court, as Commission for
    ascertaining the authenticity of the Swiss documents and
    that too without notice to the appellants and without their
    participation in those proceedings at Geneva. The
    methodology was adopted to strengthen the case of the
    prosecution.

    h) That later, on 3rd September, 1998 Mr. Moazzam Hayat, the
    then Registrar, issued notice to Ms Benazir Bhutto and her
    counsel apprising them of his appointment as Commission to
    ascertain the authenticity of the aforesaid documents. It was
    further averred that on 5th March 1999, the appellants were
    not issued any notice for execution of the Commission to be
    carried out in the Chambers of Judge Daniel Davoud at
    Geneva. It was next urged that in this behalf an appeal was
    filed by the appellants in this Court on 4th March, 1999. This
    Court suspended the operation of the aforesaid order till 8th
    March, 1999. It appears that on 8th March, 1999 order of
    suspension passed by this Court was recalled and the
    Commission completed the proceedings on the following day
    without notifying the appellants and also without associating
    them with the process.

    i) That the appellants felt aggrieved of the order of the learned
    Ehtesab Bench closing the defence evidence of the
    appellants, and challenged it before this Court. This Court in
    the precedent of Mohtarama Benazir Bhutto, M.N.A,. and
    another v. The State (PLD 2000 SC 795), inter alia, ordered
    that “the application dated 1-3-1999 filed by Ms. Benazir
    Bhutto and the application under Section 561-A Cr.P.C.
    filed by Asif Ali Zardari for summoning of witnesses or any
    other application for summoning of the witnesses filed by
    the two appellants which is pending on the record before
    the Ehtesab Bench may be taken up by the Hon Ehtesab
    Bench, after completion of the statement of Ms. Benazir

    Bhutto under Section 340(2), Cr.P.C. either on 22-3-1999
    or on such other date convenient to Court and will be disposed of in accordance with the law” but this order of the apex Court was completely ignored.

    j) That Mr. Abdul Hafeez Pirzada, learned Sr.ASC moved
    Crl. M. A. No. 64 of 2001 in Criminal Appeal No.102/98
    under Order XXXIII rule 8 of the Supreme Court Rules,
    1980 seeking a direction from this Court that “the audio
    tapes and their transcripts be made part of the Court record
    and/or pass such other order as it deem fit and proper in the
    circumstances of the case”. In this context pointed
    reference was made to the taped conversations between
    Senator Saifur Rehman and Malik Muhammad Qayyum J:
    “We will find some solution” “Find some short cut now to by
    pass things” “I am trying my best”.

    k) That the arguments of Mr. Ali Sabtain Fazli, learned Special
    Public Prosecutor were partly heard on 8th April, 1999 with
    the direction to him to complete his arguments on the
    following day at 10.30 a.m. On 9th April,1999 the learned
    Special Public Prosecutor concluded his arguments. The
    arguments of Dr. Z. Babar Awan were heard for one hour
    after 10.30 a.m. as it was Friday and, therefore, the case
    was adjourned to 12th April, 1999, on which date when Mr.
    Farooq H.Naek, learned ASC, who had replaced Dr. Z.
    Babar Awan as counsel for Ms. Benazir Bhutto, opened his
    arguments. He was, however, ordered by the learned
    Ehtesab Bench to complete his arguments by 10.30 a.m. on
    the same day. The grievance made by the learned counsel
    for the appellant was peremptorily rejected. At this stage,
    according to Mr. Abdul Hafeez Pirzada, he got up to
    intervene “as a friend of the Court and not as a counsel for
    the parties and stated that he had never experienced such
    an oppressive atmosphere in Court proceedings”. He urged
    the Court “for the sake of integrity of the Institution to give
    one more day to Mr. Farooq H. Naek, learned ASC to
    complete his submissions”. Consequently, the learned
    Ehtesab Bench reluctantly directed Mr. Farooq H. Naek,
    learned ASC, to conclude his arguments by 12.00 noon the
    following day. It was next submitted that Ms. Benazir
    Bhutto’s counsel concluded his arguments by 12.00 noon
    with the assurance by Malik Muhammad Qayyum J. that he
    was permitted to give full written submissions and that the
    learned Bench would hear him again if clarifications were
    needed.

    l) That on 14th April, 1998, the appellants’ counsel had partly
    argued on his Application under Section 265-K Cr.P.C.
    Malik Muhammad Qayyum J., however, “made a personal
    request to Mr. Abdul Hafeez Pirzada, learned Sr.ASC, to
    finish his arguments ‘tomorrow’ since he was not well and
    needed to go abroad for ‘treatment’”. The learned counsel
    for the appellant in support of his submissions, referred to
    the following conversations which had been tape-recorded
    and transcript whereof had been made available along with
    Crl.M.A.64 of 2001.
    Taped conversation between CJ Rashid Aziz Khan and Qayyum J.
    “He is going to issue warrants for both of us”- Rashid Aziz CJ. “I have already written the short order”- Qayyum J.

    Conversation between Saifur Rehman and Qayyum, J.
    “He (Nawaz) wants 101% confirmation”
    “Give them full dose” Saifur Rehman
    “After the interval at 11 a.m., even if they disagree we will not care”. Qayyum J.
    “So after half an hour we will come back and announce it” “It will be 3 or 4 page judgment”. Qayyum J.
    Saifur Rehman “Today I have to fight with you”.
    Qayyum J “Why for what reason”.
    Saifur Rehman “You were supposed to do it today”. Qayyum J “It will be done in a day or so”.
    Saifur Rehman “What can I tell you”.
    Qayyum J “For your sake I had to beg his lawyer. I told him that I have to go abroad, I am not feeling well but I have to finish it first”.
    Saifur Rehman “Hoo”
    Qayyum J “I have asked Pirzada to finish it for my sake and he has acceded to my request. Now tell me about me. Will he be happy with me. When it will be done this time. Mian Sahib will also be happy”.
    Saifur Rehman “You should have done it today”.
    Qayyum J “What does it matter in one or two days. Now it will
    be done gracefully which is very good. The people in Supreme
    Court are saying something, others are saying something”.
    Saifur Rehman “I will try to control and handle him”.
    Qayyum J “Handle him as you are my lawyer there”.
    Saifur Rehman “Yes I am and you don’t know it only God
    knows”.
    Qayyum J. “No”.
    Saifur Rehman “I only fight for you”. Qayyum J “Tell me one thing”.
    Saifur Rehman “Yes”
    Qayyum J “By the grace of God this will be done and then both of us will go to him and seek forgiveness”.

    m) That on 17th March, 1999 Ms. Benazir Bhutto appellant
    moved Criminal Misc. Application No.40 of 1999 under
    Sections 556 and 561-A Cr.P.C. mentioning therein that the
    learned Bench headed by Malik Muhammad Qayyum J.
    should not hear the Reference as he was biased against
    her as is evident from his conduct noted above and further
    that his father late Malik Muhammad Akram J. was one of
    those Judges of this Court who had confirmed the death
    sentence awarded to her father the late Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto
    and that he would convict her also. The grievance made
    was that the learned Bench dismissed this application as
    well without hearing her counsel.
    n) That the short order was announced on 15th April, 1999,
    before providing an opportunity to the appellants to pursue
    their objections on the report of the Commission and
    conclusion of the arguments. The short order had been
    prepared on 14th April, 1999 and announced on 15th April,
    1999. The learned Ehtesab Bench being conscious of the
    imbroglio corrected the date of announcement of the short
    order describing it as a typographical mistake. The short
    order was at variance with the detailed judgment inasmuch
    as the issue regarding the confiscation of the necklace did
    not figure in the former while in the latter it was made part
    thereof.
    o). That after the statement of Mr. Moazzam Hayat was
    recorded as a court witness, the incriminating parts of his
    statement as also his report were not put to the appellants
    by recording their further statements under Section 342
    Cr.P.C. which was mandatory.

    Contentions on the Question of Bias Raised on Behalf of the State.

    13. In response to the above contentions, the learned Sr.ASCs for the State
    submitted –
    i) That the assets of the appellants were ordered to be frozen in Ehtesab
    Reference No. 26 of 1998, which was temporarily entrusted to the
    Ehtesab Bench headed by Malik Muhammad Qayyum J., and not in

    Reference No.30 of 1998. Besides, before framing of charge in the titled Ehtesab Reference No.30, the appellants’ counsel had categorically stated that their application for defreezing of assets had already become infructuous as their assets had been defrozen. It was however conceded by Mr. S.M. Zafar, Sr.ASC that the diplomatic passports were granted to Malik Muhammad Qayyum J. and his wife.
    ii) That in view of the law declared by this Court in Shahadat Khan and
    another v Home Secretary to the Government of West Pakistan and
    others (PLD 1969 SC 158) and Machia and 2 others v. The State (PLD
    1976 SC 695), there was no compulsion on the Bench to try all the
    accused persons together of the same offences. The trial was separated
    on 28th September, 1998 and at the time of the framing of the charge on
    5th October, 1998, there were only two accused persons facing trial.
    Hence the provisions of section 239 Cr.P.C. were not attracted. The
    remaining accused were not available and the learned Ehtesab Bench
    was required under the Act to complete the proceedings within a period
    of 60 days as per section 10 of the Act.
    iii) That the learned Ehtesab Bench having been constituted for this
    particular case by the order of the Chief Justice of Lahore High Court
    dated 3rd July, 1998 was bound to conduct the case at Rawalpindi. The
    appellants never raised any objection in this regard till March 1999.
    Moreover, the learned Chief Justice of Lahore High Court, vide
    notifications of different dates commencing from 10th December, 1998 to
    8th April, 1999, ordered that two Judges i.e. Malik Muhammad Qayyum
    and Najmul Hassan Kazmi JJ. shall work at the Rawalpindi Bench from
    time to time, details whereof are mentioned in those notifications.

    iv) That it was evident from para 56 of the impugned judgment that in
    compliance with the order of this Court, the learned Ehtesab Bench had attended to the question of admissibility of documents first and given findings on the other questions involved thereafter.

    v) That the statement of Ms. Benazir Bhutto under section 342 Cr.P.C. was
    recorded through her counsel Dr. Z. Babar Awan who was authorised in
    this behalf on account of her exemption from personal appearance in the
    Court on acceptance of Crl. Misc. Application No. 18 of 1998. By virtue
    of her application dated 23rd February, 1999 Ms. Benazir Bhutto had not
    only accepted her statement recorded through Dr. Z.Babar Awan but
    also supplemented the same by her own statement in writing.

    vi) That Mr. Ali Sabtain Fazli, learned Special Public Prosecutor had closed
    the prosecution side of his own free will and accord.

    vii) That the Commission was appointed in order to set at rest the
    controversy raised by the learned counsel for Ms. Benazir Bhutto in an
    application moved under section 476 Cr.P.C. challenging the authenticity
    of the documents which were presented before the Ehtesab Bench. The
    arguments on the application were heard in presence of the learned
    counsel for the parties but the order was announced later on. The
    Commission was thus not appointed at the back of the appellants. In any
    case the appellants had brought the matter of appointment of
    Commission to this Court and were given ample opportunity to raise
    objections to the report of the Commission as well as to cross-examine
    Mr. Moazzam Hayat.
    viii) That the learned counsel for the appellants had the knowledge of
    appointment of the Commission throughout, therefore, non-issuance of notice of proceedings in the Chambers of Judge Daniel Devaud could not be blown out of proportion.

    ix) That the evidence of the appellants was closed on 15th March, 1999
    after passing a detailed order that they had failed to produce either their
    witnesses or to get the summonses issued in their names in spite of
    three opportunities granted to them. In any case this Court had dealt
    with the matter in Mohtarama Benazir Bhutto v The State (above) and
    disposed it of in the terms that Ms. Benazir Bhutto will be afforded an
    opportunity to examine herself under section 340(2) Cr.P.C. as her own
    witness in the case on 22nd March, 1999, or on such other date
    convenient to the Court and allowed a fair opportunity to examine the witnesses in her defence within the bounds of law. The learned counsel for the appellants were provided ample opportunity to put forth their point of view and this fact was borne out by the findings recorded in the short as well as in the detailed orders.
    x) That the ground of bias set up by the appellants that the father of the
    learned Senior Judge was one of the Judges who had confirmed death sentence awarded to the father of Ms Benazir Bhutto was no ground at all for bias as in fact the appellant might have a bias against the learned senior member and his father.

    xi) That the short order was no doubt silent about the necklace but in the
    detailed order the confiscation of the necklace did figure with the explanation that the necklace was ordered to be forfeited in lieu of nonpayment of the fine of U.S $ 8.6 million.

    xii) That the short order was prepared and announced on 15th April, 1999,
    and the date initially mentioned therein was a typographical error pure and simple which was duly rectified.

    (xiii) That mere fact that a judge has dealt with another matter earlier in
    respect of a party to the legal proceedings before him or has given
    certain decisions against such a party upon interlocutory applications in
    the proceedings before him will not render him disqualified from hearing
    the case.

    (xiv) That bias in a judge is to be shown as a matter of fact and not merely as
    a matter of opinion….

    (xv) That “mere suspicion of bias even if it is not unreasonable is not
    sufficient to render a decision void. A real likelihood of bias must be
    established”. A mere apprehension in the mind of a litigant that he may
    not get justice, such as based on influence from circumstances is not
    sufficient.
    14. In support of the last three submissions, reliance was placed on Benazir Bhutto
    v. President of Pakistan and Another (1992 SCMR 140).

    15. Learned counsel for the State also referred to the distinction drawn between the
    case of bias of a judge of a subordinate court and that of a superior court inasmuch as
    in the latter case, the judges of the superior courts were held to have a “judicial
    conscience”.
    16. Mr.Aziz A.Munshi, learned Attorney General for Pakistan defended the impugned
    order and also controverted the element of any bias of the learned senior member of
    the Bench on the grounds pressed into service by Mr. S.M. Zafar, learned Sr.ASC and
    additionally opposed Crl.Misc. Applications No.50 and 64 of 2001 by filing a detailed
    reply.

    FINDINGS
    17. Since the main plank of the case of the learned counsel for both the appellants
    is the ‘bias’ of Malik Muhammad Qayyum J. senior member of the Ehtesab Bench
    against the appellants, we have decided to examine it at the outset.
    18. The foremost question is what is ‘bias’. Bias has been described in Corpus Juris
    Secundum, Volume X pp. 354 and 355 as under:

    “BIAS. Primarily, a diagonal or slant, especially of a seam, cut, or line
    across a fabric; and so derivatively, a leaning of the mind; a mental
    predilection or prejudice; anything which turns a man to a particular
    course; a particular influential power which sways the judgment; a
    preconceived opinion; a sort of emotion constituting untrustworthy
    partiality; bent, inclination, prepossession, propension, or tendency,
    which sways the mind toward one opinion rather than another;
    propensity toward an object, not leaving the mind indifferent. ‘Bias’ has

    been held synonymous with ‘partiality’ and strictly to be distinguished
    from ‘prejudice’. Under particular circumstances, the word has been
    described as a condition of mind; and has been held to refer, not to
    views entertained regarding a particular subject matter, but to the mental
    attitude or disposition toward a particular person, and to cover all
    varieties of personal hostility or prejudice against him. (Emphasis
    provided).
    Garner on Administrative Law, 4th edition at page 122 has also attempted to define bias as a disqualification and in such context observed as follows:
    “Not only is a person affected by an administrative decision entitled to
    have his case heard by the agency seized with its determination, but he
    may also insist on his case being heard by a fair Judge, one free from
    bias. Bias in this context has usually meant that the adjudicator must
    have no financial interest in the matter under dispute, but it is not
    necessarily so limited, and allegations of bias have been upheld in
    circumstances where there was no question of any financial interest.”
    19. In this context, the following observations of Lord Denning M.R. in Metropolitan
    Properties Co. (F.G.C.), Ltd. v. Lannon and Others [1968] 3 All E.R. 304 would be
    relevant:-
    “A man may be disqualified from sitting in a judicial capacity on one of two grounds. First, a ‘direct pecuniary interest’ in the subject-matter. Second, ‘bias’ in favour of one side against the other.

    So far as ‘pecuniary interest’ is concerned, I agree with the Divisional
    Court that there is no evidence that Mr. John Lannon had any direct
    pecuniary interest in the suit. He had no interest in any of the flats in
    Oakwood Court. The only possible interest was his father’s interest in
    having the rent of 55 Regency Lodge reduced. It was put in this way: if
    the committee reduced the rents of Oakwood Court, those rents would
    be used as ‘comparable’ for Regency Lodge, and might influence their
    being put lower than they otherwise would be. Even if we identify the
    son’s interest with the father’s, I think that this is too remote. It is
    neither direct nor certain. It is indirect and uncertain.

    So far as bias is concerned, it was acknowledged that there was no actual bias on the part of Mr. Lannon, and no want of good faith. But it was said that there was, albeit unconscious, an area of likelihood of bias. This is a matter on which the law is not altogether clear; but I start with the oft-repeated saying of Lord Hewart, C.J., in R v Sussex Justices, ex p. McCarthy:

    ‘… it is not merely of some importance, but of fundamental importance, that justice should both be done and be manifestly seen to be done’.”

    20. In our own context, the Code of Conduct framed by the Supreme Judicial Council
    under Article 128(4) of the erstwhile Constitution of Pakistan, 1962 for the
    Judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts in Pakistan provides in Article IV as under:-

    “A Judge must decline resolutely to act in a case involving his own interest, including those of persons whom he regards and treats as near relatives or close friends.

    A Judge must refuse to deal with any case in which he has a connection with one party or its lawyer more than the other, or even with both parties and their lawyers.

    To ensure that justice is not only done, but is also seen to be done, a Judge must avoid all possibility of his opinion or action in any case being swayed by any consideration of personal advantage, either direct or indirect”

    21. In reaching the conclusion that Mr. John Lannon was biased Lord Denning
    employed the following terse phraseology:-
    “It brings home this point; in considering whether there was a
    real likelihood of bias, the Court does not look at the mind of the
    justice himself or at the mind of the chairman of the tribunal, or
    whoever it may be, who sits in a judicial capacity. It does not
    look to see if there was a real likelihood that he should, or did, in
    fact favour one side at the expense of the other. The court looks
    at the impression which would be given to other people. Even if
    he was as impartial as could be, nevertheless, if right-minded
    persons would think that, in the circumstances, there was a real
    likelihood of bias on his part, then he should not sit. And if he
    does sit, his decision cannot stand.

    There must be circumstances from which a reasonable man
    would think it likely or probable that the justice, or chairman, as
    the case may be, would, or did, favour one side unfairly at the
    expense of the other. The Court will not enquire whether he did,
    in fact, favour one side unfairly. Suffice it that reasonable people
    might think he did. The reason is plain enough. Justice must be
    rooted in confidence; and confidence is destroyed when right-
    minded people go away thinking: ‘The judge was biased.’”
    (emphasis provided).
    Applying these principles, I ask myself: Ought Mr. John Lannon
    to have sat? I think not. If he was himself a tenant in difference
    with his landlord about the rent of his flat, he clearly ought not to
    sit on a case against the selfsame landlord, also about the rent
    of a flat, albeit another flat. In this case he was not a tenant, but
    the son of a tenant; but that makes no difference. No reasonable

    man would draw any distinction between him and his father,
    seeing that he was living with him and assisting him with his
    case. Test it quite simply: if Mr. John Lannon were to have asked
    any of his friends: ‘I have been asked to preside in a case about
    the rents charged by the Freshwater Group of Companies at
    Oakwood Court. But I am already assisting my father in his case
    against them, about the rent of his flat in Regency Lodge, where
    I am living with him. Do you think I can properly sit?’ The answer
    of any of his good friends would surely have been: ‘No, you
    should not sit. You are already acting, or as good as acting,
    against them. You should not, at the same time, sit in judgment
    on them’. No man can be an advocate for or against a party in
    one proceeding. Everyone would agree that judge, or a barrister
    or solicitor (when he sits ad hoc as a member of a tribunal)
    should not sit on a case to which a near relative or a close friend
    is a party. So, also, a barrister or solicitor should not sit on a
    case to which one of his clients is a party; nor on a case where
    he is already acting against one of the parties. Inevitably people
    would think he would be biased.

    I hold, therefore, that Mr. John Lannon ought not to have sat on
    this rent assessment committee. The decision is violable on that
    account and should be avoided. Although we are differing from
    the Divisional Court, I would like to say that we have had a good
    deal more information than that court had. In particular, we have
    seen a letter of Jan 13, 1967, and other things not before them
    when they gave their ruling. Otherwise I would not have thought
    it right to interfere. I would allow the appeal and remit the case
    to another rent assessment committee. Let it be heard again as
    soon as may be” (emphasis provided).

    22. The element of bias in a judge was considered by the Federal Court of Pakistan
    in the case of Anwar and Another v The Crown PLD 1955 FC 185. ln that case, the
    Federal Court had the occasion to reconsider an earlier case of Khairdi Khan v Crown
    (PLD 1953 FC 223). In the former case, the case of Khairdi Khan (supra) was
    reconsidered by the Federal Court in which an appeal had been allowed because the
    High Court in its revisional jurisdiction had arrived at a definite finding of fact while
    ordering the retrial after setting aside an acquittal. In the latter case of Khairdi Khan,
    the late Abdul Rashid, CJ. inferred that the sessions judge who tried the case would
    not be able to deliver an unbiased judgment for the reason of observations made by the High Court. But the late Muhammad Munir, CJ. disagreed with the judgment in Khairdi Khan’s case and held as under:-

    “We are, therefore, perfectly entitled to hold, as we do in this case after a
    full argument that the rule laid down in Khairdi Khan’s case that bias
    vitiated all judgments and all orders made by a Judge are void is
    incorrect and should no longer form part of the law of Pakistan.”

    23. Nonetheless the late Muhammad Munir, Chief Justice, was constrained to hold
    that the accused has a right of a fair trial by a judicial minded person, not functioning
    under an influence which might paralyse his judicial faculties as to result in the absence of a fair trial. The learned Chief Justice also held that bias may be caused by a judgment, order or observation of a superior Court or it may spring from personal, political, religious, communal, racial, commercial or economic considerations. The other conclusion recorded by the Chief Justice is that bias would vitiate judicial proceedings if such circumstances are created or brought about by the Judge as would rob him of the confidence that a litigant may have in the Judge. We can do no better than reproduce as under the observations of late Munir, CJ:-
    “Thus no Judge can be a Judge in his own cause, or in a case in which he is personally interested, not because his decision must invariably be in his own favour but on the principle that justice must not only be done but see[n] to be done, and however right the Judge deciding a cause in his own favour may be, neither the public nor the aggrieved party will be satisfied with the adjudication, and its result will be vacated by the Court of Appeal at the instance of the dissatisfied party.”
    24. It may be added at this juncture that the consideration of bias is a branch of the
    principles of natural justice. It is now agreed on all hands that there are certain broad
    principles of natural justice deducible from two Latin maxims firstly, Nemo Debet Esse
    Judex in Propria Sua Causa which formed the foundation of the doctrine firstly, that no
    one can be a judge in his own cause which in a wide application means that a judicial or
    quasi-judicial authority not only himself [must] not be a party but must also not be
    interested as a party in the subject-matter of the dispute which he has to decide and; the
    second principle is Audi Alteram Partem (hear the other side). Bias is said to be of three
    different kinds:

    (a) A Judge may have a bias in the subject-matter which means that he is himself a party or has direct connection with the litigation, so as to constitute a legal interest. A ‘legal interest’ means that the Judge is ‘in such a position that a bias must be assumed’.
    (b) A pecuniary interest in the cause, however, slight, will disqualify the
    Judge, even though it is not proved that the decision has in fact been affected by reason of such interest. For this reason, where a person
    having such interest sits as one of the Judges the decision is vitiated
    .

    there is any allegation of personal bias, the question which should be
    satisfied is: “Is there in the mind of the litigant a reasonable
    apprehension that he would not get a fair trial?” The test is whether
    there is a “real likelihood of prejudice”, but it does not require certainty.
    “Real likelihood” is the apprehension of a reasonable man apprised of
    the facts and not the suspicion of fools or “capricious persons”.
    (emphasis provided).

    25. No doubt, the judges of the superior courts are blessed with a judicial conscience
    but the question nonetheless is whether a particular judge of the subordinate or the
    superior judiciary against whom the allegation of bias is alleged is possessed of judicial
    conscience. This litmus test is indeed very difficult but certainly not impossible. The
    circumstances of a particular case wherein bias of a judge is alleged would themselves
    speak volumes for the same. In other words, the principle is well settled that a judge of
    the Superior Court is a keeper of his own conscious and it is for him to decide to hear or
    not to hear a matter before him. However, in the present case we are not inclined to
    adhere to the said settled principle because bias is floating on the surface of the record.
    26. Admittedly, the assets etc of the two appellants were frozen by the Bench
    headed by Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J. in Ehtesab Reference No. 26/1998 on 27th
    April, 1998. This fact also stands admitted that Ehtesab Reference No. 26/1998 was
    temporarily entrusted to the Bench headed by Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J. The
    undisputed material made available on the record makes it manifest that Malik
    Muhammad Qayyum, J. had already moved an application for the grant of a
    diplomatic passport for himself and his wife which had reached the Prime Minister
    Secretariat on the 17th April, 1998, along with the following summary:-

    “SECRET
    MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS

    SUMMARY FOR THE PRIME MINISTER
    Subject: Request for Issuance of Diplomatic Passports to
    Justice Malik Muhammad Qayyum, Judge Lahore High Court and his Wife.
    1. The Ministry of Law has requested for grant of diplomatic passports to Justice Malik Muhammad Qayyum, Judge Lahore High Court and his wife.

    affected by reason of such interest. For this reason, where a person
    having such interest sits as one of the Judges the decision is vitiated.
    (c) A Judge may have a personal bias towards a party owing to
    relationship and the like or he may be personally hostile to a party as a

    result of events happening either before or during the trial. Whenever
    there is any allegation of personal bias, the question which should be
    satisfied is: “Is there in the mind of the litigant a reasonable
    apprehension that he would not get a fair trial?” The test is whether
    there is a “real likelihood of prejudice”, but it does not require certainty.
    “Real likelihood” is the apprehension of a reasonable man apprised of
    the facts and not the suspicion of fools or “capricious persons”.
    (emphasis provided).

    25. No doubt, the judges of the superior courts are blessed with a judicial conscience
    but the question nonetheless is whether a particular judge of the subordinate or the
    superior judiciary against whom the allegation of bias is alleged is possessed of judicial
    conscience. This litmus test is indeed very difficult but certainly not impossible. The
    circumstances of a particular case wherein bias of a judge is alleged would themselves
    speak volumes for the same. In other words, the principle is well settled that a judge of
    the Superior Court is a keeper of his own conscious and it is for him to decide to hear or
    not to hear a matter before him. However, in the present case we are not inclined to
    adhere to the said settled principle because bias is floating on the surface of the record.
    26. Admittedly, the assets etc of the two appellants were frozen by the Bench
    headed by Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J. in Ehtesab Reference No. 26/1998 on 27th
    April, 1998. This fact also stands admitted that Ehtesab Reference No. 26/1998 was
    temporarily entrusted to the Bench headed by Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J. The
    undisputed material made available on the record makes it manifest that Malik
    Muhammad Qayyum, J. had already moved an application for the grant of a
    diplomatic passport for himself and his wife which had reached the Prime Minister
    Secretariat on the 17th April, 1998, along with the following summary:-

    “SECRET
    MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS

    SUMMARY FOR THE PRIME MINISTER
    Subject: Request for Issuance of Diplomatic Passports to
    Justice Malik Muhammad Qayyum, Judge Lahore High Court and his Wife.
    1. The Ministry of Law has requested for grant of diplomatic passports to Justice Malik Muhammad Qayyum, Judge Lahore High Court and his wife.

    2. According to the rules covering the issuance of diplomatic passports, Justice Malik Muhammad Qayyum and his wife are not entitled to hold a diplomatic passport. It may further be noted that Judges of the High Court and the Supreme Court are not entitled to the grant of diplomatic passports. If an exception is made in one case, other members of the Judiciary are likely to ask for similar privileges. This Ministry is, therefore, not in favour of making an exception in the case.
    3. The Prime Minister’s kind orders are nevertheless solicited on Justice Malik Muhammad Qayyum’s request.
    4. The Foreign Minister has seen and approved the Summary.
    Sd/-
    (Anwar Kemal)
    Acting Foreign Secretary

    Prime Minister’s Secretariat (Mr.Tauqir Hassain, Additional
    Secretary (FA), Islamabad).
    Ministry of Foreign Affairs U.O.No.S/FS/AD 56/98 dated 17-3-
    1998.

    Prime Minister has been pleased to approve Para 1 above: grant of diplomatic passports to Mr. Justice Malik M. Qayyum, Judge, Lahore High Court and his wife.

    Sd/-
    Secretary, Foreign Affairs 30-041998”

    27. It is noteworthy that on the same summary the following direction was given by Senator Saifur Rehman, who was then in charge of Ehtesab Cell, to one of his subordinate Officers:-

    “Mr.Sami Khilji please have it delivered to Justice Qayyum”

    Regards Sd/-
    Saif

    28. The order with regard to the freezing of properties and assets etc. of the appellants
    was passed on 27th April, 1998 while on 30th April, 1998, the Prime Minister approved
    the grant of diplomatic passports to the learned Judge and his wife ignoring the
    formidable objection raised by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It was candidly conceded
    by the learned Attorney General for Pakistan that no Judge of the Superior Courts is
    entitled to grant of a diplomatic passport except the Chief Justice of Pakistan.

    29. The unchallenged document in respect of the grant of diplomatic passports not only
    goes a long way to suggest that Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J. had acquired a
    personal interest in the case by deriving an out of the way favour of the grant of
    diplomatic passports to him and his wife but also divulges a close liaison between the
    learned Judge, Senator Saifur Rehman and Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, the then
    Prime Minister whose political rivalry with Ms. Benazir Bhutto appellant is a matter of
    common knowledge.
    30. There is yet another undisputed circumstance, highlighted by Mr. Abdul Hafeez Pirzada, from which inference of partiality of the learned Judge and liaison with the then Prime Minister Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif can be safely drawn. It is that Malik Parvez, real brother of Malik Muhammad Qayyum J., was a sitting Member National Assembly of PML (N) having been elected unopposed through a bye-election against a seat vacated by Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif.
    31. The order of defreezing of the assets of the appellants passed by another Bench seized of Reference No.26 of 1998 was not produced before us. Be that as it may, the order appears to have aggravated and not diminished the personal interest of Malik Muhammad Qayyum J. in the case whose link with Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, who was diametrically opposed to Ms. Benazir Bhutto appellant cannot be denied. This conclusion of ours gets complete support from the principle enunciated in para 22 of the judgment in the case of Ms. Benazir Bhutto v. President of Pakistan 1992 SCMR 140 that “there seems to be judicial consensus that a Judge having pecuniary or proprietary interest or any other personal interest in the subject matter of a case before him cannot hear the case (emphasis provided).

    32. Initially Ehtesab Reference No. 30/1998 was pending at Lahore from where it was
    transferred by this Court on 14th December, 1998 to Rawalpindi Bench of Lahore High
    Court vide judgment in the case of Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto supra (1999 SCMR 759).
    At that time an Ehtesab Bench comprising Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi and Sheikh
    Amjad Ali, JJ. was already functioning and was seized of, inter alia, another Ehtesab
    Reference No.31/1998 pending decision against Ms. Benazir Bhutto. Notwithstanding
    the ratio of the judgment of Mohtar

  64. sorry here is the remaing part
    Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto supra being that the Reference
    aforesaid be heard at Rawalpindi by the Ehtesab Bench functioning there, Malik
    Muhammad Qayyum, J. somehow or other managed to have the Reference heard by
    the Bench headed by him even at Rawalpindi. It would, therefore, be worth while to
    reproduce hereunder para 51 of the Short Order in the case of Mohtarma Benazir
    Bhutto, supra:-
    “At present, two Ehtesab References are pending against the
    petitioners at Rawalpindi Bench of Lahore High Court (Ehtesab
    Reference 32 and 33/98) while five References against the petitioners
    are pending at principal seat of Lahore High Court (Reference
    Nos.26,27,29,30 and 31/98). As the petitioners, inter alia, have their
    residence in Islamabad, it is directed that References Nos. 26,27,29,30
    and 31 of 1998 which are being heard at principal seat of Lahore High

    Court, will henceforth be heard at the Rawalpindi Bench of Lahore High
    Court where two Ehtesab Reference are already pending against
    them.”
    33. The judgment of this Court was mis-interpreted as if the Ehtesab Bench was ordered to be transferred to Rawalpindi Bench rather than the Reference itself.
    34. It appears from the record that notifications were issued by the then learned Chief Justice Lahore High Court, from time to time to enable Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J. to visit Rawalpindi to hear Ehtesab Reference No.30/1998 and to be present on each and every date of hearing of the afore-noted Reference. It supports the contention of the learned counsel for the appellants that Reference No.30/1998 was virtually “chased” by Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J. and the exercise had caused substantial financial loss to the state exchequer. The “chase” thus given amply demonstrates the keen interest of Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J. to impose himself on the matter and take it to its end according to his pre-conceived notions.

    35. In course of hearing of Reference by the learned Judges, the following
    circumstances stare into one’s eyes from which the inescapable deduction is an urge
    to proceed hastily to reach the foregone conclusion. First and foremost circumstance is
    the separation of trial of appellants from their other ten co-accused. No doubt the said
    course of action is permissible in law but that can only be done after complying with the
    requirements of law. Under Section 512 Cr.P.C. the trial can be bifurcated but before
    that it has to be adjudged that the other co-accused are avoiding to face the trial or
    their presence cannot be procured without any amount of delay. In the present case,
    the summonses were sent to Switzerland to the foreigner accused and the report
    received back revealed that a period of thirty days was required to effect the service.
    The learned Judges in haste did neither wait for the requisite period nor repeated the
    process and separated the trial. In this context there is nothing on the record to show
    the mode of service or issuance of the process against the co-accused of the
    appellants particularly when A.R. Siddiqui the then Chairman CBR and Khalil Ahmad,
    Chief Collector Customs were in Pakistan. Their attendance could, therefore, have
    been secured, but the learned Judges do not seem to have taken any step to procure
    their attendance. It seems that the only target for the trial was the person of the
    appellants. In our view the failure to procure attendance of the co-accused of the two
    appellants and the consequential orders were motivated.

    36. The record reveals the glaring injustice meted out to Asif Ali Zardari appellant when
    the Court declined to grant him permission to recall certain witnesses for the purpose
    of cross-examination. The learned Judges proceeded to observe, vide order dated 22nd
    February, 1999, that since no prejudice had been caused as the defence of both the
    appellants was joint, therefore, there was no necessity to afford an opportunity to the
    appellant Asif Ali Zardari to cross-examine the said witnesses. It may be pointed out
    that because of freezing of assets and funds, the appellant Asif Ali Zardari had
    expressed his inability to engage a counsel of his choice to cross-examine those
    witnesses. Admittedly, Asif Ali Zardari appellant had not cross-examined PWs 1 to 5

    and PW11 and the learned Judges had observed that if at a subsequent stage it was
    felt that some prejudice had been caused due to non-availability of a counsel for Asif
    Ali Zardari appellant, the Court would consider recalling the aforesaid witnesses for
    further cross-examination. Having observed so, the learned Judges declined to allow to
    Asif Ali Zardari appellant an opportunity to recall and cross-examine those witnesses.
    In our view, it was an invaluable right of Asif Ali Zardari appellant to recall and cross-
    examine those witnesses for ensuring a fair trial. Denial of such right had caused
    failure of justice and had prejudiced the appellants in their defence, besides reflecting
    bias.

    37. The mode and manner in which the statement of Ms. Benazir Bhutto under section
    342 Cr.P.C. was recorded leaves no doubt in our mind that the provision of section 342
    Cr.P.C. was abused with a view to reach at a hasty conclusion. The underlying object
    of section 342 Cr.P.C. is to enable an accused to explain the incriminating
    circumstances in the prosecution evidence appearing against him. In our view, this is
    the most valuable right being a sacrosanct principle of natural justice. No doubt, the
    attendance of Ms. Benazir Bhutto appellant had been exempted but as she was
    available in Pakistan, it was incumbent upon the learned Judges to have summoned
    her for recording her statement. The features of the prosecution case also necessitated
    her examination in person. To our utter dismay the learned Judges opted not to do so
    and considering the compliance of the provisions of law sufficient by recording the
    statement of her counsel who according to the learned counsel for the appellants was
    not authorised to speak on her behalf. According to Ms Benazir Bhutto appellant, when
    she came to know that her statement under section 342 Cr.P.C had been got recorded
    through her counsel she at once made an application to supplement her statement
    under section 342 Cr.P.C. and made a supplementary statement in writing containing
    answers to all the questions put to her counsel and requested the Court to treat the
    statement in writing as her statement under section 342 Cr.P.C. but queerly enough
    her said statement was ignored. The circumstance is also a link in the bias.

    38. In the course of trial, while the statement of Hassan Waseem Afzal (PW14) was
    being recorded, an application under section 476 Cr.P.C. was moved by the learned
    counsel of Ms. Benazir Bhutto appellant for taking action against the witness for
    producing allegedly fabricated documents. The learned Judges directed the
    prosecution to file reply which was done by Hassan Waseem Afzal in his personal
    capacity. The learned Judges, in post-haste appointed a Commission consisting of Mr.
    Moazzam Hayat, the then Registrar, Lahore High Court for proceeding to Switzerland
    to ascertain the genuineness and authenticity of those documents. This order was
    passed on 1st March, 1999, with the direction to the Commission to submit its report
    within ten days. The Commission issued notice to the learned counsel for Ms. Benazir
    Bhutto appellant to appear before him in Switzerland on 5th March, 1999. Imagine, how
    could a counsel or an accused appear in Switzerland in four days particularly when
    travel arrangements had to be made and a visa to be obtained. This order was
    challenged in this Court which suspended the order of appointment of Commission and
    proceedings before it. However, this order was vacated on 8th March, 1999 when Mr.
    Moazzam Hayat was already in Geneva. After vacation of the order without issuing a

    fresh notice to the appellant, the Commission proceeded to execute the Commission. In this context, the exact grievance is reproduced hereunder:
    “The matter came up for hearing on 1st March, 1999 and the learned
    Ehtesab Bench passed an order for production of defence evidence by
    the petitioner and adjourned the case [to] 8th March, 1999 for the
    purpose. During the proceedings of the case the Special Public
    Prosecutor pressed the plea taken in the written reply on behalf of
    Hassan Wasim Afzal, P.W.14, for issuance of commission to verify the
    genuineness and the authenticity of certified copies of documents
    tendered in evidence by the prosecution. It is alleged that no order was
    passed when the case was adjourned in presence of both the parties.
    At about 4.00 p.m. it was communicated by the Additional Registrar of
    the Lahore High Court at Rawalpindi to Mr.Farooq H. Neak, Advocate,
    on telephone, that the impugned order has been passed by the learned
    Ehtesab Bench and despite request, copy of the order was not
    provided.”

    39. The manner of the appointment of the Commission and the Commission having proceeded to Geneva and the steps taken by it in Geneva shows a mysterious hidden hand behind it.

    40. While challenging the appointment of Commission, the question of admissibility of
    the documents produced by Hassan Waseem Afzal (PW14) was agitated and leave
    was granted by this Court. At the time of disposal of the appeal, this Court passed the
    order in the case of Mohtarama Benazir Bhutto v. The State PLD 1999 SC 937 [i.e. to
    provide adequate opportunity to the parties to raise any objection against the report
    including the question of the admissibility of the disputed documents before disposing
    of the Reference]. We are sorry to observe that in flagrant disregard of the directions
    issued by this Court the learned Judges proceeded to decide the case in its entirety
    whereas learned Judges should have taken up the question of admissibility of
    documents first as ordained by this Court. The learned Judges, after receipt of the
    report of Commission, treated it as an incriminating circumstance but we have noticed
    that this important piece of allegedly incriminating evidence was not put to the
    accused.
    41. Another intriguing circumstance consists of the statement of Mr. Ali Sabtain Fazali,
    learned Special Public Prosecutor. It was pointed out by the appellants that his
    statement was in fact recorded by the learned Ehtesab Bench itself giving up three
    very important prosecution witnesses including V.A.Jaferi, Javed Talat and Khalil
    Ahmad. Ostensibly it was done by the learned Judges with a view to delivering the
    judgment hastily and this statement was merely read over by the Court to the learned
    Special Public Prosecutor who admitted it to be correct. This strange procedure was
    prima facie adopted in order to hasten the proceedings and to reach the foregone
    conclusion.

    42. We have considered all the above noted features of the case and we have also
    noted the fate of the application moved by the learned counsel for Asif Ali Zardari
    appellant under Section 265-K of Cr.P.C. The atmosphere must have been highly
    charged. It can also be imagined when on the intervention of the Court the proceedings
    were drastically cut short by the learned Judges; the defence evidence was restricted

    to the recording of the statement of a solitary defence witness, namely, Muhammad
    Nawaz, Superintendent Landhi Jail as DW1. Suddenly the Court rises, retires to the
    Chambers, re-appears after a while and the short order is handed down on 15th April,
    1999 which appears to have been pre-authored bearing the date as 14th April, 1999,
    which was scored off and corrected.
    43. At this stage, it will be pertinent to mention that the Ehtesab Bench which tried and
    convicted the appellants consisted of two learned Judges. It appears from the record
    that Malik Muhammad Qayyum J. being the senior member of the Bench had exerted
    his influence on the second member S. Najamul Hassan Kazmi J. who being an
    unconfirmed Judge of the Lahore High Court was sweating for confirmation. We have
    taken judicial notice of the relevant Notifications issued by the Government of Pakistan
    in the Ministry of Law, Justice, Human Rights and Parliamentary Affairs dated 27th
    May, 1997, 26th May, 1998 and 13th May, 1999 that the said learned member of the
    Bench was appointed as Additional Judge of the Lahore High Court for a period of one
    year but the tenure was extended for a further period of one year with effect from 28th
    May, 1998 and he was ultimately appointed as a permanent Judge on 13th May, 1999.
    44. In support of this appeal an attempt was made at the bar that the learned Judges were not applying independent minds and had been pressurised and coaxed by the authorities in power to oust the appellants from the arena of politics by securing their disqualification to hold public office. On behalf of the appellants certain audio tapes and their transcripts were attempted to be brought on the record. It was argued that Mr. Khalid Anwar, the then Law Minister, Mr. Rashid Aziz Khan J., the then Chief Justice of Lahore High Court, Senator Saifur Rehman and Malik Muhammad Qayyum J. were clandestinely in league with each other to secure the conviction of the appellants at the behest of the then Prime Minister of Pakistan.

    The other side took a categorical stance that the audio-tapes were fake and in any
    event were extraneous for the purpose of determination of the matter in controversy in
    the appeal.

    45. There is no need to advert to the audio-tapes and their transcripts as there is
    sufficient material on record which substantiates the allegation of bias. We are
    convinced that the trial in this case was not fair and on account of bias of the Ehtesab
    Bench, highlighted in preceding paragraphs, the trial of appellants stands vitiated.

    46. Resultantly, the titled appeals are accepted, convictions recorded against and the sentences awarded to the appellants are set aside and the case is remitted to the Court of competent jurisdiction for trial afresh in accordance with law. This disposes of the connected matters as well.

    47. Before parting with the judgment we are inclined to dispose of plea of Mr. Abdul
    Hafeez Pirzada, learned Sr.ASC to the effect that Asif Ali Zardari, appellant had already
    served out the substantive sentence of imprisonment and, therefore, he is entitled to be
    released from jail. As we have already sent the case to a Court of competent
    jurisdiction, it would be more appropriate if this matter is agitated before the Court
    aforesaid.

  65. قاضی حسین احمد آج که رہے ہیں کہ “طالبان نے جو طریقہ کار اختیارکیا ہے اس سے انہیں اختلاف ہے کیونکہ بم بلاسٹ،میوزک شاپس کو اڑانا یا خوف سے اسلام پھیلانا درست نہیں “(قاضی حسین احمد )
    http://search.jang.com.pk/update_details.asp?nid=101006#
    کیا ؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟
    تو یہ طالبان بم بلاسٹ کر رہے تھے ؟
    پر یہی قاضی اور منور حسن کہتے تھے کہ یہ سب طالبان کے خلاف پروپگنڈہ ہے اور یہ بلیک واٹر ،امریکا ،اسرایل اور ہندو کروا رہے ہیں جن کی ختنہ نہ ہونے کی تصدیق بھی قاضی حسین پہلے ہی کر چکے ہیں …
    پر آج یہ کیوں که رہے ہیں کہ طالبان کے طریقہ کر سے انھیں اختلاف ہے ؟
    کیا یہ کھلا تضاد نہیں ؟
    کھلی منافقت نہیں ؟
    کھلا جھوٹ نہیں ؟
    جب سوات میں ظلم ہو رہا تھا اور طالبان طاقت ور تھے تو یہ حمایت کرتے تھے اور مسلم خان ،فضلاللہ اور صوفی محمد کے اسلام کو جماعت اسلامی کا ہی نظریہ کہتے تھے اور یہ بھی کہتے تھے کے یہ جو کچھ سوات میں ہو رہا ہے وہ غیر مختون ہندو اور جتنے خود کش دھماکے ہیں وہ امریکا کروا رہا ہے پر ساتھ ہی ہر دھماکے کے بعد یہ بھی کہتے تھے کہ دھماکے جبھی روکیں گے جب طالبان سے مزاکرات ہونگے اور جیسے ہی کوئی دھماکہ ہوتا اور لوگ مرتے تو یہ اپنی مذہب اور لاشوں کی سیاست لے کر میڈیا پر آجاتے اور مزاکرات کی رٹ لگاتے اور آپریشن روکنے کے لیہ کہتے اور جب ان خونی جنونی طالبان کو کوئی کامیابی ملتی تو ان کے ساتھ ہو جاتے اور کہتے ہم اور طالبان ایک ہی ہیں
    الله جانے ان مذہب کے نام پر قتل کرنے والوں کا آخرت میں کیا حشر ہو پر دنیا میں بھی یہ ناکام اور مردود ہی نظر اتے ہیں .جماعت اسلامی کے کارکن اپنے لیڈروں کی اس منافقت اور جھوٹ پر کیا سوچتے ہونگے معلوم نہیں

  66. آ ئی ایس آئی ضیاء الحق گروپ اور طالبان کے نمائندے ،جماعت المنافقین کے امیر منور حسن نے ایک بار پھر پور کمینے پن کا مظاہرہ کرتے ہوئے کہا ہے کہ” دہشتگردوں کا مقابلہ صرف مزاکرات ہی سے ممکن ہے ” یاد رہے یہی منافق کہتے تھے کہ دشت گردی کرنے والے بلیک واٹر کے اجنٹ ہیں تو اگر یہ بلیک واٹر ہیں تو پھر بلیک واٹر ہی سے مزاکرات کا که رہے ہونگے مگر یہ تو طالبان سے مزاکرات کا که رہے ہیں یہ منفقت اور مکاری نہیں تو اور کیا ہے ، اور ساتھ ہی یہ بھی دھمکی دی ہے کہ “شمالی وزیرستان بارود کا ڈھیر اور ہاتھ لگانے والا خود اڑ جائے گا ”
    یہ وہی منافق ہیں جنہوں نے سوات میں بھی مزاکرات کا کہا پر خود غایب رہے اور لوگوں کو طالبان دردوں کے رحم کرم پر چھوڑ دیا ،یہ وہی لوگ ہیں جو ہر دھماکے کے بعد کہتے ہیں یہ بلیک واٹر ہیں اور دوسرے دن کہتے ہیں کہ اگر طالبان سے مزاکرات نہ کیے تو یہ خودکش دھماکے ہوتے رہیں گے .ان جماعتی درندوں کی سیاست لاشوں پر زندہ ہے . منور حسن ،مولانا مودودی دونوں کے استاد سید قطب ہیں جنہوں نے اس دشتگردی کی بنیاد رکھی – اسامہ بن لادن اور ایمن زواہری کا بھی رشتہ سید قطب سے ہی ہے ،القاعدہ اور جماعت اسلامی اصل میں ایک ہی تنظیم ہیں اور ایک ہی نظرتیہ رکھنے والی جماعتیں ہیں .دیوبند ان کے اثرات سے دورر رہا ہے پر افغان جنگ کے بعد دیوبند مدرسوں میں اسی تکفیری اور جماعتی نظریات کے شامل ہونے سے ایک جماعت طالبان کی شکل میں ظاہر ہوئے ہے
    پر حیرت یہ ہے کہ جتنی پاکستان میں کھلم کھلا دہشدگردی کی حمایت ہوتی ہے اتنی کسی بھی اسلامی ملک میں نہیں ہوتی ،یہ منور حسن جا کر یہ بیان اگر سعودی عرب ،ایران ،ملیشیا ،مصر یا بنگادیش میں دیں تو دوسرے ہی دن انہیں ڈیپورٹ کر دیا جائے گا .اور اگر کوئی جماعت اسلامی جیسی تنظیم جو دشتگردوں کی حمایت کرتی ہو اور اس میں شریک بھی ہو تو وہ ملک کے خلاف غدّاری تصور کی جاتی ہے ،پاکستان کی عوام ،حکومت اور فوج دہشتگردوں سے لڑ رہی ہے اور ان دشتگردوں نے ملک کے کونے کونے میں خون خراب کیا ہے . جماعت اسلامی جیسی تنظیمیں جو پچھلے ساٹھ سالوں سے ووٹ نہیں لے سکی ہیں اب وہ سمجھتے ہیں کہ شاید اس دہشرگردی کے نتیجے میں ان کی حکومت آ جا ے .
    حکومت ،فوج اور عدلیہ کو ان دشتگری میں شریک رہنے والی جماعتوں اور ان کو سپورٹ کرنے پر قانونی ایکشن لینا چا ہیے .
    http://search.jang.com.pk/update_details.asp?nid=101681
    منور حسن کا بیان ”
    لاہور…جماعت اسلامی کے امیر سید منور حسن کا کہنا ہے کہ دہشت گردوں کا مقابلہ طاقت سے نہیں مذاکرات سے ہوسکتا ہے، شمالی وزیرستان بارود کا ڈھیر ہے اسے آگ دکھانے والا خود بھی اڑ جائے گا۔منصورہ لاہور میں جماعت اسلامی کے نومنتخب عہدیداروں داروں سے خطاب کرتے ہوئے ان کا کہنا تھا کہ اسٹریٹیجک مذاکرات ،ڈائیلاگ نہیں امریکی ڈکٹیشن ہیں امریکہ بھارت کا وکیل بن کر کشمیر پر ثالثی نہ کرے تو بہتر ہے۔ ان کا کہنا تھا کہ حکومت کے جو لوگ انقلاب کی بات کرتے ہیں وہ اپنی ناکامی کا اعتراف کرتے ہیں۔ سید منورحسن نے کہا کہ انقلاب رویوں میں تبدیلی کا نام ہے، افراتفری کا نہیں۔ خطے میں امریکہ کا عمل دخل بڑھ گیا ہے اور ملٹری آپریشن ڈو مور کا نتیجہ ہے۔”

    http://search.jang.com.pk/update_details.asp?nid=101681

  67. وائس چانسلر اجمل خان کی رہائی کے لیہ طالبان کے نمائندوں سے اپیل ،

    اپیل ،اپیل ،اپیل

    وائس چانسلر اجمل خان جنھیں تحریک طالبان نے اغوا کیا ہوا ہے اور قتل کرنے کی دھمکی دی ہے ،ان کے لئے پاکستانی عوام کی طرف سے طالبان اور طالبان کے نمائندوں یعنی مفی رفی عثمانی ،تقی عثمانی ،انصار عباسی ،پنجابی طالبان میڈیا کے نمائندے حامد میر ،منور حسن ،طالبان کمانڈر حمید گل ،حافظ سعید ،رانا مقبول،عمران خان اور دیگر طالبان کے حمایتیوں ،مذہبی جماعتوں اور میڈیا میں طالبان کے لیہ کام کرنے والوں سے اپیل کی جاتی ہے کے وہ وائس چانسلر اجمل خان کو رہا کر وانے کے لیہ اپنے طالبان دوستوں کو سمجھائیں .
    طالبان پہلے ہی ہزاروں لوگوں کا قتل کر چکے ہیں اور کئی سکول تباہ کر چکے ہیں اب وہ یونیورسٹیوں کے پیچھے پر گئے ہیں
    طالبان کے حمایتیوں کو ایک بار پھر یاد دلانا ہے کہ تاریخ بتاتی ہے کہ ہمیشہ جس نے بھی مذہب کے نام پر خوں خرابہ کروایا ہے بلا آخر وہ خود ان کے گلے پڑی ہے .

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/pakistan/2010/11/101108_teachers_protest_as.shtml

  68. Great work by 4manshow guys about Zaid Hamid ,Lets have some fun one the main page

    Zaid Hamid Come Back to media
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AgoIB1_L6g&feature=related

    Zaid Hamid Latest Interview

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7gcZSbS8gg&NR=1

    Great Sir Zaid Hamid explaining his plans and training our youth for Monkey warfare – 7 : Part 2

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1ii-U6Hpxg&feature=related

    Khalifa Zaid Hamid on White horse

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZ4Jm9tWJzc&feature=related

    Great Sir Zaid Hamid getting engaged on 4 Man Show 3

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hCzv_Dn5s8&feature=related

    Funny video 4 Man Show parody Zaid Hamid
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsGIYat7BAk&feature=related

    Zaid Hamid failed in Bollywood Audition Crying in public
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjWPAwgJwYU&feature=related

    A pakistani on moon?? Zaid hamid
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtSP1mYJWSk&feature=related

    Matko with Zaid Hamid | 4 Man Show
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGQpv6Frpe4

    Zaid Hamid – Solo Interview –He’s Back

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erhbo_qc5l8&feature=related

  69. PLEASE READ MY LETTER PUBLISHED IN THE NATION NEWSPAPER

    nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Opinions/Letters/20-Nov-2009/Story-so-far/1

  70. To the utter surprise of all, the Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Economic Affairs on Tuesday unanimously passed the drafts of Reformed General Sales Tax (RGST) Bill and Flood Surcharge Bill with all diehard opponents – both in ruling alliance and Opposition – keeping complete mum except making a few recommendations to be incorporated in the aforementioned drafts.
    The Committee met under the chair of Senator Islamuddin Shaikh. The Committee Chairman Senator Ahmed Ali, an MQM MNA and a strong opponent of RGST, was not present in the two-day meeting. The Committee did not face any hurdle in the passage of the drafts of these bills, as neither opposition party nor the coalition partners opposed them.
    The Committee members suggested giving tax exemptions to all food items whether they were packed/ canned or open commodities. Similarly they demanded that the Government should also exempt all types of locally produced medicines and stationary items including books from taxes.
    Talking about Flood Surcharge Bill, the Senators suggested that minimum level for this tax should be enhanced to Rs 0.5 million instead of Rs 0.3 million. These recommendations would be presented in the Upper House of the Parliament in the next couple of days, which would then refer them to the Lower House.
    The Committee approved increase in Special Excise Duty from one to two per cent.
    Earlier talking in the meeting, Finance Minister Abdul Hafeez Shaikh said, “We have no other option but to introduce RGST in the country for revenue generation.” He was of the view that prices of those items would go up which were still exempted from the taxes, while prices of some commodities would come down, as the GST percentage would be reduced to 15 percent from 17 per cent in RGST, he added.

  71. dear chairman sahib.ppp aik nuzriati jamat hai aur aaj 44 saal ki history shuhdas ki qurbanion se bhari pari hai kionkay iski bunyad shaheed bhutto ne rukhi thi.aaj tareekh ka aik siah din hai jub bhutto k qatal zia ul haq k staff officer jo bhutto sahib ki shahdat k waqat zia ul haq k deputy military secretary tha colonel mohammad aziz khan aur bhutto sahib ki shahdat pay inki begum shamshad aziz ne begum shafiqa zia ko mithai laa k dee thi aur puray army house mai baanti thi.iskay baad aziz gen zia k sath as brigadier military secretary raha aur benazir shaheed k ghar major qayum jo k aziz khan ka punjab regiment ka dost tha benazir ko budnaam kurnay bb k ghar bhaija k meray bb se najaiz taluqat hain.zia ul haq ki ibrat naq moat k waqat uss waqat brigadier aziz aur uski biwi shamshad aziz ne jinaza k tamam intzamat kiay thay iska saboot uss waqat ki pictures se daikh lain.phir 1996 mai major gen aziz ne isi mai reh k taliban bunai aur uss waqat afghan leaders aur farooq leghari ko gen hamifd gul k sath mil kur convince kya k bb aur zardari islam aur pakistan k liay security risk hain.phir ye he general aziz thay jinhun ne farooq leghari ko colonel rafiq leghari k through paigham bhijwaya k zardari aapki beti ki blue movies release kur raha hai.baad mai gen mushraaf k sath nawaz sharif ki hakumat khatam kurnay k baad gen aziz ne he faisal saleh hayat ko bulwa kur patriot group bunwaya tha aur baad mai zardari sahib ko lahore mai b tung kurwaya 2004 mai.2008 mai inkay baitay weaqas ki shadi k moqa pur lahore se special bhand bulwa kur zardari sb aur bb k khilaf parody mehndi pay sub ko sunwai.aaj yehi general aziz ki begum jo k bb ko budkirdar aur zardari sb ko mr 90 percent kehtay thay sabiq wazeer azam ajk haji yaqub k sath mil kur kul pallandri mai ppp join kurnay ka ailan kya ha.haji yaqub ko begun shamshad ne yaqeen dilwaya hai k wo isko fauj ki support dilwaingi aur next pm bunwaingi jubkay khud begun shamshad ladies seat pur assembly mai aingi.kya aaj ppp pay itna bura waqat aa gya ha k bhutto sahib kay qatil ppp mai shamil ho rahay hain aur mithai baantunai walay jo zardari choar k naray lugatay thay aaj ppp mai aa rahay hain.nab mai inki beti hina ka susar major mashood lodhi hotay thay aur unhun ne wahan se billions se ziada ki corruption ki aur red handed pukray gai aur aaj b jail mai hai aur mirzai b hai.agar ppp ne in loagun ko rukha tu HUM ZARDARI KO CHOAR KEHNAY WALY AUR MR 90 PERCENT KEHNAY WALAY GENERAL AZIZ AUR ISKI BIVI KO KUBHI BURDASHAT NAHI KURAINGAY BULKAY APNA VOTE PML N KO DAI DAINGAY WO BHUTTO KAY QATIL AUR ZARDARI KO LAST 30 YEARS SE CHOAR TU NAHI KEHTAY RAHAY.GEN AZIZ AUR ISKI BIVI NE GEN ZIA K REFERENDUM AUR USKAY BAAD EJAZ UL HAQ KI TAMAM ELECTION COMPAIGNS CHULAIN AUR 2008 ELECTIONS MAI ZAMURAD KHAN K KHILAF EJAZ UL HAQ AUR HANIF ABBASI KI SUPPORT KI THI AUR PML N K SUPPORTER HAIN

  72. Great shame for The elite Civil Society of Pakistan who are not supporting Sherry Rahman and Salman Tasair on there bold step to protect poor and marginalised woman.

  73. Cold war between PML-N and MQM has a long history since 1990s and due to their ongoing war sometimes nation faces something very unpleasant, as they did some days back in the end of december which was very ashamed for both parties, such abusing and irreverent words were uttered on both sides which is unthinkable for their voters; dirty politics of these political rivalaries is damaging already tinted image of politicians. Both parties represent urban areas of Pakistan but their leaders have got wisdom not more than a coward of a populous village of the rural areas. Intense war of words seemed to be non-stop at one stage meanwhile PPP’s central information secretary Fauzia wahab called for cease their unethical warfare of words, she used to play constructive role and always good statements are given whenever such political imbroglio is surfaced. She has represented her party very best since her appointment as Central information secretary and now she has become face of PPP. She used to discourage divide and rule policy infact she acts as mediator to shun the differences among all political groups. Talking to media she said that political leaders must not use abusing language against each other and their inappropriate manners would make worst current political stand-off. Then the father figure of this political setup president asif ali zardari also stressed both parties heads to rein in thier leaders, and eventually matter was settled when rival groups’ heads intervened upto now there is pin drop silence in the atmosphere but what will happen next is again unpredictable.

  74. Refrence to the responsibility of holding the seat of a Governer he has to be very careful in giving statments regarding to the religeous beliefs of the public who are the jamhoor major actors of definning Takht ya Takhta for a government.No1,Second point is if a human being is honoured the seat of a Governer to be representative of the fedration is the icon to saveguard the sentiments of the peoples – being a citizen of Pakistan he has been honoured and awarded a protocol of the governer so being the citizen of the particular province are bound to honour his protocol.so when we talk about the sensitivity
    of the Protocol subject to the protocol of The Holy Prophet (Mohummad Peace be Upon Him)is seemed to be harmed – hence in accordance with media statements and the press conference initiated by the Governer Salman Taseer on blasphemy law was highly risky and un -careful and attempt to by pass the decisions of lower courts. and on a very sensitive issue which was being heard in the courts he came forward and taken law in his own hands – so the protocol of the Holy Prophet Mohummad Peace Be Upon Him is discussed in uncarefull order .
    Even we see in the past several times the decision of the honourable courts been set aside and by passed.
    So this sharp contrast bay of conflicts resulting in to the Assacination of the Governer.
    So being the head of the province or state it is the ironic responsibility of the personality to be very very care ful in imposing his personal thoughts to advocate his own likings or dislikings –

    we should be very confined about our religeous thoughts
    and never try to run the state affairs single handedly.

  75. http://arabnews.com/opinion/article253715.ece
    ABDULATEEF AL-MULHIM | ARAB NEWS
    An Israeli conspiracy that never existed

    I have, since childhood, been hearing about an invisible thing called the Israeli conspiracy.

    It is always said that Israel did this and Israel did that. What is worse is when I hear that Israel is planning to do that. So, if we already know what Israel is planning to do, then why not either stop it or avoid it. The biggest conspiracy I heard regarding the Arabs and the Israelis is the humiliating defeat of June 1967. The Egyptians blamed everybody but themselves for the defeat. They insisted on speaking about why some planes came from the north and not from the east. They insisted that they were American Navy planes attacking Egypt. Did not the military analysts hear about evasive maneuvers, or did they expect the air force to fly like commercial airlines by taking the shortest and direct routes.

    It turned out that the Egyptian forces were commanded by Gamal Abdel Nasser who only held the rank of major. Hours before the Israeli attack, all air defense sites were told to be on hold because Field Marshal Abdulhakim Amer’s plane was in the air. So, it was not an Israeli conspiracy that defeated the Egyptians, it was the poor planning and having a tired army coming back from Yemen tasked to go to a war that even Nasser did not know how to manage.

    That was Egypt in 1967, but what about the Egyptian uprising of 2011? Was it the Egyptians or outside forces? The Egyptian leadership used to call Al Jazeera the match box. The channel’s media center in Qatar is so small that people used to wonder why regional leaders were worried about such a small media building, one that is small as a match box. It turned out that the Egyptian authorities had Al Jazeera on the top list of places to close. There was also no Israeli media center and Israel has no interest in seeing an unstable Egypt. Thomas Friedman once said that Al Jazeera should have been established in Egypt, not Qatar.

    Egypt is a country whose media should have been at the front of providing information. However, Egyptians living inside the country and abroad are glued to foreign news outlets. Let us not doubt the Egyptians in their sincere request for change. We cannot accuse 80 million Egyptians of being toys in foreign hands.

    To this day, I see Arabs blaming Israelis for young Arab drug addicts, their poor education, the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, bad roads, corruption, lack of democracy, unemployment, 9/11, the division of Sudan, the upheaval in Tunisia and the unrest in Egypt. If Israel can do all these things, then the Israelis are either super humans or we simply enjoy blaming others for our failings.

    The books of history indicate that the Arabs would have been able to get back the Golan Heights, Sinai, the West Bank and all the 1967 boundaries if Gamal Abdel Nasser made just one phone call to Israel and admitted defeat two days after the June 1967 war. And fewer Palestinians would have been scattered all over. But, we the Arabs never admit defeat.

    The Arab world is in a state of unrest nowadays. Egypt is the largest country in the Arab world with 82 million people. If it shakes, then the whole Arab world will shake. It is not time to point fingers at either the West or Israel. Each country has an agenda to benefit its people. Arabs must think what is best for their people, not their leaders. Israel did not open a European bank account for Zine El-Abidine Ben Ali. He did, and where did the money come from? Israel did not hide the billions of dollars in Iraq used by Saddam Hussein while the Iraqis were starving. Saddam did.

    You can agree or disagree, Israel is a country that has the best education system in the Middle East and a per capita income of more than $28,000.

    The Arabs and Muslims must get rid of the notion that the whole world is conspiring to destroy them. The Arab world is rich in raw materials, rivers, fertile land, wealth and educated people. We must concentrate on education, health care, infrastructure, transparency and open channels between the rulers and the ruled. It is very sad to see Iraq, one of the richest countries in mineral resources, water and educated people, having millions struggle like refugees. It is also sad to see Yemen wasting 40 percent of its water resources to grow qat, just as it is sad to see a country like Lebanon that has the potential to be an attractive tourist spot being fractured because of vested interests, not national interests. Why have we failed to solve the flood problem in Jeddah with all the time and money our government has allocated for the city?

    Linda Heard wrote an article in Arab News on Nov. 8, 2010, titled “Israel is digging its own grave.” Yes, the Israelis are digging a grave. But for whom is the grave being dug for? I am sure it is not for the Israelis.

  76. پنجاب میں ایم کیو ایم کا مقدمہ
    ارشد سلہری
    \ ایم کیو ایم کی پنجاب میں آمد خوش آئندہ امر ہی۔پنجاب میں ایم کیو ایم کو کھلے دل سے عوام نے خوش آمدید کہاہی۔ گزشتہ سال راقم کو پنجاب کے مختلف شہروں گوجرانوالہ،سیالکوٹ مرید کے ، نارووال ،لاہور جانے کا اتفاق ہوا ،یہاں بڑی تعداد میں ایم کیو ایم کے دفاتر نظر آئے اور ایم کیو ایم کے جھنڈے اور الطاف حسین کی تصاویر آویزاں نظر آئیں۔ مناظر بہت اچھے تھی،گزشتہ روز ایم کیو ایم نے لاہور قذافی سٹیڈیم کے فٹ بال گرائونڈ میں جلسہ کا انعقاد کیا اور پاور شو کرنے کی کوشش کی ہی۔جلسہ کی حاضری کیا تھی۔ شرکاء کی تعداد اور لوگوں کی ایم کیو ایم میں دلچسپی میرا موضووع نہیں ہے کیونکہ جلسوں میں شرکاء کی تعداد اور جلسوں کے حجم سے کسی بھی سیاسی جماعت کی عوامی مقبولیت اور سیاسی قد کا ٹھ کا اندازہ لگانا درست نہیں ہی۔ جماعت اسلامی اور جماعت دعوہ کے جلسے بھی بڑے بڑے ہوتے ہیں لیکن پنجاب کی عوام بالخصوص ووٹ ڈالتے ہوئے کسی اور کا انتخاب کرتی ہی۔ میرا مو ضوع عوام کی مایوسی، دکھ،تکالیف،مہنگائی،بے روزگاری ہے کہ آیا ایم کیو ایم مذکورہ مسائل کے حل کیلئے کوئی واضح روڈ میپ، لائحہ عمل کوئی پروگرام دے رہی ہی۔ جس کی بنا پر عوام ایم کیو ایم کا انتخاب کررہے ہیں۔ اور اگر ایسا ہی ہے تو اس وقت عوام مسلم لیگوں،پیپلز پارٹی اور مذہبی جماعتوں سے مایوس ہیں، ایک بڑا خلا ہی۔ قیادت کا شدید بحران ہی۔ یہاں یہ سوال پیدا ہوتا ہے کہ ایم کیو ایم میں ایسی کوئی صلاحیت ہی؟ کہ وہ اپنے سیاسی فلسفہ ، اپنے سابقہ ریکارڈ،سیاسی نظریات یا پروگرام کے ذ ریعے پنجاب کی عوا م کو جیت لے گی؟ اس سوال کا جواب نہیں مل رہا ہی۔جو کہ اصل مسئلہ ہے اور ایم کیو ایم شاید اس سوال کا جواب دے بھی نہ سکی، راقم کی حاصل کردہ معلومات اور ذاتی مشاہدات کے مطابق پنجاب میں ایم کیو ایم کے اب تک کے زیادہ تر ذمہ داران اپنے حلقہ اور علاقے میں اچھی شہرت کے حامل نہیں ہیں۔ اکثریت نوسربازوں اورجرائم پیشہ ذہنیت، آوارہ گردوں اور سیاسی اپروچ سے عاری افراد ہیں، جو ایم کیو ایم کے تحصیل اور صوبائی سطح پر عہدوں اور ذمہ داریوں پر بر جمان ہیں اور وہ ایم کیو ایم میں اپنے خاص عزائم اور مقاصد کیلئے شامل ہوئے ہیں۔ اس کے علاوہ ماسوائے چند ایک کے کوئی بھی سنجیدہ شخص تاحال ایم کیو ایم میں شامل نہیں ہوا اور یہ ایک ایسی حقیقت ہے کہ جس سے کوئی بھی انکار نہیں کرسکتا ہی۔یہی ایک ایسی وجہ ہے کہ جس کے باعث پنجاب میں ایم کیو ایم کی پہلے دن سے کوئی حیثیت نہیں رہی ہے اور ایم کیو ایم کے بارے میں جورائے عامہ تھی اس پر مہر تصدیق ثبت ہوگئی ہے کہ ایم کیو ایم’’بدمعاش‘‘(معذرت کے ساتھ) جماعت ہی۔ پنجاب میں عام آدمی ایم کیو ایم کو سیاسی جماعت کی بجائے دوسری حیثیت دے رہے ہیں۔ اور شہروں میں ایم کیو ایم کے نئے بنائے جانیوالے ذ مہ داران اپنا پہلا فرض اپنی دہشت بنانا ادا کرتے ہوئے نظر آتے ہیں۔ کہ ؟؟تمہیں معلوم نہیں میں ایم کیوایم کا فلاح ہوں’’ اگر میری بات نہ مانی گئی تو ایک منٹ میں شہر کی اینٹ سے اینٹ بجا سکتا ہوںوغیرہ وغیرہ۔ بعض کو ان کی ایسی حرکات کی وجہ سے منہ کی بھی کھانا پڑی ہے اور بعض حوالات کی سیر تک بھی جا چکے ہیں۔پہلا امیج تو ایم کیو ایم کا یہ ہے ۔ پنجاب میں اگر ہم دوسری جانب دیکھیں تو ایم کیو ایم پنجاب کے عوام سمیت پاکستان بھر میں کوئی واضح سیاسی پروگرام نہیں دے پائی ہے اور نہ وہی واضح نظریات نظر آتے ہیں۔ قائد تحریک الطاف حسین انقلاب کی بات کرتے ہیں۔نعرے لگاتے ہیں وہ کبھی انقلاب فرانس کی مثال دیتے ہیں اور مڈل طبقے کی بات کرتے ہیں، جس کا حقیقی معانوں میں کوئی وجود ہی نہیں ہی۔انقلاب کی کوئی واضح سمت نظر نہیں آتی ہے ۔جس کے باعث جو باشعور نوجوان،طالب علم،محنت کش ہیں ۔ایم کیو ایم کی جانب جانے سے ہچکچاتے ہیں۔ایم کیو ایم میں الطاف بھائی کی پوجا پاٹ ہی۔ نظریات کی تعلیم یا تربیت نہیں ہے ۔شخصیت پر ستی کی انتہا ہی۔ جس کے باعث ا یک خاص قسم کاماحول اور صورتحال ہے ۔ جس میں کام کرنا ہر شخص کیلئے آسان نہیں ہوتا ہی۔ پنجاب میں ایم کیو ایم کے شور شرابے سے ایک بات ضرور ہے کہ عوام میں انقلاب کی بازگشت کو تقویت ملی ہے اور کھلے عام انقلاب کا نعرہ لگایا جانے لگا ہے اور ایک ہلچل کی سی کیفیت پیدا ہوتی ہوئی نظر آتی ہی۔ اس سارے عمل میں مسلم لیگ(ن) ہی واحد جماعت ہی۔ جس کیلئے کچھ پریشانی ہوسکتی ہے ۔باقی ایم کیو ا یم سے کسی بھی جماعت کو کوئی خاص فرق نہیں پڑنے والا ہی۔ مسلم لیگ ن کو اس لئے کہ مسلم لیگ ن میں جاگیر دارانہ، اجارہ دارانہ اور سرمایہ دارانہ سوچ پائی جاتی ہی۔مسلم لیگ ن کا کا رکن اس ح حوالے سے اپنی سیاسی وابستگی پر نظر ثانی کر سکتا ہے ۔مسلم لیگ ن کو نقصان ہوگا اور وہ بھی معمولی نوعیت کا ہی ہوگا۔ اس کے علاوہ ایم کیو ا یم پنجاب میں زیادہ اثر انداز ہوتی ہوئی نظر نہیں آتی ہی۔ پنجاب کے عوام روایت پسند ہیں۔پاکستان بھر سمیت پنجاب کے عوام کی روایت بھی پیپلز پارٹی ہے ۔ک جس کی روایت ذوالفقاعلی بھٹو کی قائم کردہ ہے ۔اس روایت کو توڑنا اور اس کی جگہ نئی روایات کو قائم کرنا کم از کم جناب الطاف حسین اور ایم کیو ا یم کے بس کی بات نہیں ہے کہ وہ پرانی روایات کو توڑ کرنئی راویات کو رواج دیں ۔ ایسا ہوتا ہوا آئندہ00 سال میں بھی نظر نہیں آرہا ہے ۔ایم کیو ایم یا الطاف حسین اس کو توڑ نہیں سکتے ہیں۔’’ مزدور کا بھٹو آج بھی زندہ ہی۔ یہ میں نہیں کہہ رہا ہوں۔ اگر کسی کو شک وشبہ ہے تو مزدورں کے پاس جا کر دیکھ لی۔ کسی غریب کی جھونپڑی میں جھانک کر دیکھ لی۔ غریبوں، ہاریوں ،کسانوں اور محنت کشوں کا بھٹو زندہ ہے اور جب تک محنت کشوں، ہاریوں ،کسانوں اور غریب کا بھٹو زند ہ ہے ، تب تک کوئی دوسرا کسے پنپ سکتا ہے ہاں بھٹو کی جگہ کوئی دوسرا لایا جائے ،تو پھر بات بن سکتی ہی۔ جس کا امکان ابھی تک نظر نہیں آرہا ہی۔ اور ایم کیو ایم اس کی اہلیت،صلاحیت نہیں رکھتی ہے کہ وہ پنجاب میں متبادل کے طور پر اپنا آپ منوا سکے اور عوام کے دلوں کو جیت سکی۔

  77. your procedure of registering is very strange i have tried time abd again but failed,as athe password i was sent either wasnt correct or there is something wrong. I put that password butt it repeatedly told me that password is wrong,please help me registering…thx

  78. It would have been better if there is statement on first page that it belongs to PPP then they have right to say things about ISI Army and other political parties, otherwise it is not appropriate to make blogs which looks like independent but are not [Don’t take it in negative sense when ISI can make propaganda against PPP then why they CAN NOT :)].

  79. I have taken the liberty of using one of your photographs (the durgah of Data Ganj Baksh) for my blog. Please let me know if it is o.k. with you, otherwise I shall remove it from my blog.
    Thanks in advance.

  80. MUNAFIQ MAFIA: THE MOST
    DANGEROUS ENEMY

    BY JAVED ZAHEER, FREE EXPRESSION AWARD WINNER

    TORONTO: I read a very interesting and informative article by renowned journalist Gordon Duff titled `Who is Rupert Murdoch?’
    Gordon Duff is a Marine Vietnam veteran. A 100% disabled vet. He has been a featured commentator on TV and radio, including Al Jazeera, and his articles have been carried by news services around the world.
    Gordon has been a UN Diplomat, defence contractor and is a widely published expert on military and defence issues. Duff is Senior Editor at one of the most widely read Veterans Online publications `Veterans Today’
    I was attracted by the specific mention and description of ultra-nationalists in the article. Gordon Duff first asked: “Who are Ultra-nationalists?” and then went on to describe: “Ultra-nationalists are known to support wars, plan terrorist acts, manipulate populations into strife and racism, foster fear and panic, even financial ruin.”
    In short, known to be committed enemy of mankind and a potential threat to global peace, world and humanity, they are considered extremely dangerous and deadly. Credit for the massive death and destruction all over the world and suffering of the people goes to them. This was never a secret.
    They pose as Good Human Beings, lovers, followers and believers of The Almighty and the people, but in reality they are worse than the most dreaded beasts, criminals and cannibals found in any part of the universe. Their cunningness, cruel nature and evil character just cannot be described in words.
    I appreciate the efforts of Gordon Duff and would like to invite him and all Veterans to consult and study the Holy Quran and other original holy books as well in order to understand the true definition and description of ultra-nationalists. This will help a lot in the analyses and writings. This way Gordon can create proper awareness and understanding and contribute tremendously. He will help in bringing a real change.
    The holy books are the best sources to understand and expose the non-believers, ultra-nationalists, terrorists and all people of bad and harmful nature.
    The Almighty has clearly, openly and strongly condemned and angrily cursed them in the original holy books including Bible, Quran and the scriptures. The Wrath of God did destroy some of them and both the history and holy books tell us about this.
    People are warned not to follow them. Yet it happens and most of the people become their prey. Only those who read carefully, understand sensibly, believe and follow truly the holy books, wise and good people do not become their victim. The Almighty says that they cannot be harmed because they enjoy His special blessings and protection.
    Unfortunately, most of us despite aware of the facts fail to read, understand and follow the holy messages and the signs told to us repeatedly in the holy books.
    The Almighty in the original holy books including Bible, Quran and scriptures through narrations and commands tells and warns us about the stubbornness, cunningness, cruel nature and bad character of the dangerous people.
    They knowingly and deliberately work against The Almighty, His holy books and true believers. The Almighty says that He Himself will deal with them because they belong to the category and army of the devil and will never reform and become good. Those who follow them will automatically become part of the group and face similar consequences. This is very serious.
    We must understand this and remain fully alert. Unfortunately, most of us know these common messages and signs and also love and respect The Almighty but don’t fear, follow and worship Him in the true sense.
    The Almighty openly, clearly and proudly says in the holy books that His true lovers, followers and believers will never ever worship any other god or follow any other message than La Ilaaha Illallah (There is no deity except Allah). All prophets, saints and true believers of The Almighty believed in and promoted this common message.
    The distraction, differences and hatred among the people were created through distortions of the holy messages, dirty propaganda and conspiracies by these very cunning and evil character people—The Devils and Demons.
    They are extremely powerful and influential. They control the economy, governments, media, institutions, leaders and important people. This is how they make the people, belonging to any religion, and all under their control and influence helpless and their slaves. This is how they promote and protect their vested interests and cause massive deaths and destruction.
    It is rightly said that Islam is the best religion and Muslims are the worst followers. Since over 1400 years, most Muslims have proved this right. This is one of the main reasons of their sufferings, defeat and downfall. Numerically their number is very high and it is almost impossible to convert even the most uneducated and least sensible Muslim.
    Most Muslims keep strongly condemning, criticizing and pointing finger towards others but what they don’t understand and realize is that they are committing a Grave Sin by knowingly acting against the commands and messages of The Almighty.
    They blindly follow the fake, fraud and anal-sex-crazy Mullahs posing as wise men, pious persons and saints. Just look around and you will find hundreds, thousands and millions.
    The enemies of mankind mentioned in the original holy books could not succeed in distorting the messages of The Almighty in the holy Quran. They then found other ways to distract and harm the Muslims. One of the best was posing as Mullahs. For this they formed Munafiq Mafia (Hypocrites Mafia).
    The Munafiq Mafia started building madressas (Religious institutions) and mosques and from there started confusing and distracting people and creating hatred, differences and divisions. The innocent people listening to them were trapped and started following them. They started giving more importance to such fake, fraud and anal-sex-crazy Mullahs than The Almighty. They lost touch with The Almighty.
    Imagine some Muslims saying: “In Islam there is least use of brain, mind and common sense.” With such thinking where would one head—definitely darkness and disaster.
    In order to understand properly messages and commands of The Almighty, we need to read or listen, understand and then follow or act accordingly. For all this we need to use brain, mind and common sense. Unfortunately, many Muslims, even educated ones, don’t agree and don’t want to understand this fact? This is happening because of influence of Munafiqs (hypocrites) posing as Mullahs and exploiting the people.
    Because such Muslims are acting as brainless therefore others easily make them emotional, fool and exploit them. They easily fall into traps and become victims. This way it becomes easier to harm and kill them.
    The Fake, Fraud and Anal-Sex-Crazy Mullahs hook and trap them easily and keep playing with them. They keep dancing on their tunes, thinking and considering them as supreme. They would not listen to anybody including The Almighty but would only obey and follow the Munafiqs posing as Mullahs.
    Because of thousands of Munafiqs posing as Mullahs, the Muslim community is facing a tough time and challenge. It is a clash between Allah-Waley and Mullah-Waley. The Allah-Waley are true believers and very few but protected by The Almighty. The Mullah-Waley are in millions and making millions through their followers. Their main interest is in making money by any means including donations and appeals.
    The Munafiq Mafia (hypocrites Mafia) dominates and manages the affairs of madressas (Religious institutions) and mosques so that they can harm the Muslims and defame Islam. They are bringing bad name to Islam and real Mullahs or good Muslims.
    The Allah-Waley (True believers and good Muslims) want to build the character of Muslims and help them through proper teaching and make them really powerful through proper resources but the Munafiq mafia does not allow them to work properly and keeps troubling them in one way or the other.
    It is time to check and control the Munafiq Mafia and free Muslims, mosques and madressas from their dangerous and dirty influence and control. They must not be allowed to exploit and play with the good and true Muslims and any people.
    Illiteracy, an important tool used and promoted by the Munafiq Mafia and ultra-nationalists, is another main reason and enemy of the Muslims and other people. It is causing tremendous harm to the Muslim community and humanity.
    There are hundreds of shocking examples. Taboos and un-Islamic social, cultural and religious traditions have destroyed the Muslims and made their lives miserable.
    The ultra-nationalists, the Munafiqs (hypocrites) and their likes are all Human Beasts. They have badly gripped the people, harming and killing them mercilessly. When are the people going to wake up, stand up and challenge the Human Beasts and free the helpless people from their claws, clutches and grips?
    The solution is very simple. Instead of becoming follower of the devil, become friend of The Almighty, His believers and all good people. He fulfils His promise of protection. Nobody can deny this. Conscience is the voice of God and good. So make conscience our guide and listen to what it says. Whisper is the magical voice of the devil and can only harm and destroy us. So avoid listening to it and stop obeying it.
    I was presented a book titled `Way to Happiness’ by Nicole Crellin, scientologist, community outreach coordinator for Youth for Human Rights International, and Human Rights Director of the Church of Scientology of Toronto. Email: ncrellin@sympatico.ca.
    I am also a human rights activist and strongly support the cause. I found the book interesting. The human rights content of the book matches the message of the holy books. So I was not surprised. As regards Human Rights, it was a very informative book.
    I told her: “Most of the human rights contents match the holy books. If you read the holy books than you can see and understand the similarity. Amazingly, this book is being promoted as good for all but the holy book Quran is labelled as promoting terrorism. How can the same message be looked so differently?”
    We need to accept everything good but at the same time remain very protective. We never know about the hidden agendas and intentions. If there is anything doubtful we can always withdraw and say NO.
    I always keep promoting and supporting the messages and effort of Nicole Crellin with good intentions. Our understanding is based completely on awareness, understanding and promotion of Human Rights.
    In short, we are promoting Human Rights to help the people understand and fight the Human Beasts like Ultra-nationalists and other committed enemies of mankind.
    I told Nicole to change her approach if she wants to work with the Muslim community. Firstly, she will have to convince that the Human Rights contents do match that of the Holy Quran and holy books. She will have to prove this to win the trust and confidence of the Muslim community. Secondly, that her intentions are good and does not in any manner aimed to harm or convert Muslims.
    Nicole says that she is associated with the Church of Scientology but the Youth for Human Rights International (YHRI) project is a totally different thing. This is meant to help people of all communities. Those who have doubts can visit the websites including of Church of Scientology, which promotes the works of Ron L. Hubbard.
    If people have doubts of any kind and evidences of any type which prove that she is working against the people and certain community like Muslim then they can always expose her.
    Finally, if we want to make the world a safe place to live in and serve humanity with in the real sense, then we need to change our thinking, attitude, approach and character according to what The Almighty commands and wants.
    We need to show courage, determination and unity for this. It seems but is definitely not difficult and impossible. We have to impress and convince the people in order to win their trust, confidence and support. Remember conscience is your best friend and guide and whisper your destroyer and worst enemy.
    —Javed Zaheer (JAZA/JAYZEE/JZEE), Free Expression Award Winner, Desi Idol Recognition Award Winner, Member/Honorary Director of NEPMCC, Veteran Active Member (VAM) of Toronto Press Club, Ex-Member of The National Club and The Ontario Club, Honorary Editor of English Weekly `Pakistan Abroad’, ex-Chief Editor (Honorary) of English Weekly `The Ambassador’, ex-Senior Sub-Editor of English Daily DAWN, Pakistan, Chairman, CANOPI, and Director, Canpak Camber of Commerce, is contributing purely on Voluntary and Honorary Basis in order to serve all people and communities. Contact: (416)696-0981/newsviews@hotmail.com. .
    To read more JZ’s exclusive articles, please visit the following websites: http://www.letstree.com (Pressing needs section), nepmcc.ca and nationalethnicpress.com (Home Pages & Editorial Sections. Scan years from 2004 to 2011).

  81. SUPPORT DEMOCRACY,
    NOT DEMONCRACY

    BY JAVED ZAHEER, FREE EXPRESSION AWARD WINNER

    TORONTO: Because of the guidance, blessings and protection by The Almighty I am alive and whatever I have—contentment, peace, respect and success—and am today— professional journalist.
    My passion, commitment and love for writing and to serve humanity gave me the tremendous strength to remain part of the journalism profession since 1974, despite extremely difficult times and tough challenges including attempts on my life. They only increased my determination to face them more strongly and fiercely.
    The writing for living was just a part but mainly it was for a cause since the beginning. The sacred cause is to serve humanity in whatever ways possible. Even fear of death in worst health conditions and challenging situations could not scare and stop me from writing and serving. I just enjoy my professional and humanity work and derive great satisfaction from them. These become the best parts of my life.
    In Canada, I am writing since my arrival in 1999. My position remains the same—honorary basis and freelance journalist. I am serving the people worldwide through many electronic and print media platforms. The Almighty has blessed me with great success and respect.
    In Canada also, if I was not working on Honorary Basis, I would have been FIRED from my job and STOPPED from using many media platforms. Such was the intense pressure on people managing English Weekly Pakistan Abroad, where I am serving as Honorary Editor.
    The team of `Pakistan Abroad’ is very much intact and more determined to serve the people and promote love, peace, awareness, understanding, good people and true leadership. Adventures, threats and dangers are part of our lives and professional duties and responsibilities.
    The bitter truth of parties and leaders brought before the readers are meant to expose those playing with the lives, fate and hard earned money of the people. We are for real democracy and not evil demoncracy. This is the simple difference between us and others. As Canadians, we cannot allow any harm to the people, system or Canada. This is what we try to do.
    It is hoped that all leaders and parties will understand and appreciate our policies and performance and support us in practically serving the people, Canada and the country of origin—our Pakistan and of all others.
    When we write about our country of origin, we try to help the people and country. We have nothing against the land and the people. We very much love both of them and get disturbed when see them in hardship, difficulty, danger, pain and trouble.
    Our struggle and fight is against all those harming the people and the country—corrupt ones and traitors. We are not helpless and just cannot see people suffering and dying whether in Pakistan, Canada or anywhere. No threats or dangers can scare or stop us from helping, supporting, protecting and serving the people.
    I do receive `suggestions’ from Pakistan as well not to write openly and fiercely about the situation and happenings in Pakistan. Thanks to the freedom of expression in Canada that I am able to serve in the best possible ways through writing. Canada gave me the best opportunities and rights and I am fully benefiting and enjoying them.
    If I was in Pakistan, I too would have been brutally tortured and mercilessly killed either by the extremists or agencies. This is because I cannot stop myself from writing for the people, country and humanity. This has become a crime in Pakistan. The corrupt ones and traitors cannot tolerate this. This is against their vested interests.
    People know very well that some journalists in Pakistan are on the payroll of the foreign agencies including CIA, Mossad and RAW and are working against the people and Pakistan. They are busy collecting secrets and passing them to their foreign masters. The military and civil agencies keep monitoring them. When they become a real threat, they are stopped or eliminated. This is done in the interest of Pakistan and the people.
    But the scaring and killing of all journalists busy in performance of their professional duties and responsibilities should be condemned in the strongest words. Nobody is above the law and all those involved in such heinous crimes must be exposed, stopped and severely punished whether they are extremists or agencies.
    We must fully support the journalist community in Pakistan so that they can be protected and allowed to perform their duties fearlessly and professionally.
    The black sheep in the journalist community and their partners and supporters, who are on payrolls and involved in espionage and harm to the people and Pakistan, must be exposed and punished.
    This cannot be allowed at any cost. We cannot allow any harm to the people and land whether it is Pakistan or Canada. Both the countries and their people are very much dear to us.
    —Javed Zaheer (JAZA/JAYZEE/JZEE), Free Expression Award Winner, Desi Idol Recognition Award Winner, Member/Honorary Director of NEPMCC, Veteran Active Member (VAM) of Toronto Press Club, Ex-Member of The National Club and The Ontario Club, Honorary Editor of English Weekly `Pakistan Abroad’, ex-Chief Editor (Honorary) of English Weekly `The Ambassador’, ex-Senior Sub-Editor of English Daily DAWN, Pakistan, Chairman, CANOPI, and Director, Canpak Camber of Commerce, is contributing purely on Voluntary and Honorary Basis in order to serve all people and communities. Contact: (416)696-0981/ javedz@hotmail.com.
    To read more JZ’s exclusive articles, please visit the following websites: http://www.letstree.com (Pressing needs of the world section), nepmcc.ca and
    nationalethnicpress.com (Home Pages & Editorial Sections. Scan years from 2004 to 2010), pakistanabroad.ca (Issues) and caribbeanbusinessmagazine.ca.
    NOTE: PLEASE READ AND FORWARD TO ALL CONTACTS/GROUPS SO THAT MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PEOPLE/ COMMUNITIES ANYWHERE COULD BENEFIT. LET’S HELP BUILD BRIDGES AND LIVE & WORK TOGETHER FOR SUCCESS AND PROGRESS.
    BEST REGARDS: JAVED ZAHEER, CANADIAN OF PAKISTANI ORIGIN.
    DEDICATED TO SERVE, CREATE LOVE, AWARENESS AND UNDERSTANDING

  82. Take off the word Shaheed from the Benazir video. She is no shaheed. When will you idiots learn the meaning of Shaheed.

  83. میں یہ کہوں گا کہ سیاسی بلاگز میں ایل یو بی پی کا اب تک کوئی ثانی نہیں ہے۔ گو میں رائٹ ونگ کا آدمی ہوں اور لیفٹ اور پیپلز پارٹی کی بہت سے نظریات سے مجھے اختلاف ہے لیکن چند چیزوں پر ایل یو بی پی کے مستقل بلاگرز اور میرا اتفاق جیسے اینٹی فوجی اسٹبلشمیٹ ہونا اور بلوچستان کے لوگوں کی بات کرنا وغیرہ

  84. it is now very clear that ppp is the victim of judicial activism. even the people like Muhammad Malik and Raja salman admit the fact. watch today’s program LAKIN of SANA BUCHA on geo tv. i dont have time or the resources to publish it. watch it urself

  85. Trial or Wrath of Allah!

    By: Zubair Khan

    For many years now Pakistan seems to be engulfed with ever increasing internal/external disturbances, turmoil and natural calamities. These internal/external disturbances, turmoil and natural calamities jolt the country either in the shape of terrorist attacks, sectarian based killings or in the form of earthquakes and floods. Same time armed gangs belonging to various Islamic, ethnical and ideological groups have hijacked the whole nation. Disappearance of human beings, belonging to rival religious belief and ideology groups, and later discovery of their distorted and degenerated bodies have become a daily phenomenon in various parts of the country. Kidnapping of wealthy and influential to demand ransom is a lucrative business these days. Electricity, CNG load shedding, corruption and bad governance in each department of life have further added to the miseries of ordinary Pakistani. Various activities of military brass, judiciary and civil elite to down grade each other dragging the country in to further deeper waters and heading for dire consequences. Without exception each Pakistani seems to have lost the characteristic of patience and even on petty matters all keep on fighting with each other. Almost all consider their life in hell on this part of the planet. Such continued pathetic state of affairs surprises many analysts and force them to ponder for a deeper research to find out the reasons.
    Sometimes ago Mr. Salim Safi, presenter of Geo TV program Jirgah, aired a program on the topic given as the title of this article. On telephone line, during the program, he connected live few Ulemas and other notables of the country. At least each “religious Aalim” of the country declined to accept the present pathetic state of the country as wrath of God rather termed it as trial for the nation to learn lesson and improve spiritual behavior. According to single argument of these religious Aalims the wrath of God targets a nation only when some messenger of God is sent and nation refuses to accept him. According to the interpretation of these religious Aalims, chapter of coming of any messenger of God has since been closed as such no chance for Pakistani nation to deny such messenger thus question of wrath of God on Pakistani nation is ruled out for ever. Someone attempted to bring in the concept of promised Imam Mehdi and Messiah. However in such programs since the control always remains with presenter as such this voice was pressed down.

    Now here one very pertinent question arises. Throughout two centuries, whole Muslim Ummah was waiting for the prophesied Imam Mehdi and Messiah. Designated time line approached and passed. Meanwhile Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian claimed to be the promised Imam Mehdi and Messiah. Immediately hue and cry spread and the majority of Muslim Ummah threw him and his followers out of the pale of Islam. Till today the founder of Ahamdiyya Community is considered to be infidel and impostor. From the time the founder of Ahamdiyya Community made the claim, no other claimant came in the field. Rather now this chapter of Imam Mehdi and Messiah almost seems to have been closed and no one expects any heavenly entity anymore. However when we make comparison between Muslims of Pakistan relative to Ahamdiyya Community very distinguished facts reveal. In spite of opposition of whole Muslim Ummah this community is flourishing each day. It is most organized, disciplined and spirited community. In whole of the world community is in forefront for the construction of the mosques. The community has translated holy Quran in more than 50 languages. Community owns its television net work known as MTA (Muslim Television Ahamdiyya) broadcasting the Islamic programs round the clock in many famous languages of the world. These days, in many developed countries the community is taken as the sole representative of moderate and peaceful Islam. Community has openly claimed that in its history of 123 years, never ever any member of the community indulged in extremist or anti state activities. Community is led by a supreme head which is called Khalifa and all members offer unconditional allegiance to Khalifa and obey him in all good things.

    Here now million dollar question arises. If the founder of Ahamdiyya community was infidel or impostor that too on the name of Allah and Islam, why then community is prospering every day? During 123 years of its history why any worldly power did not succeed destroy this movement. Rather there are obvious examples where many powerful entities perished when they tried to strangulate this community. Very openly supreme head of community is announcing the truth of founder of community as promised Imam Mehdi and Messiah and terming the miseries of Pakistan as wrath of God due to maltreatment of Ahamdiyya community in that country. Here one can say why to single out Pakistan while all other countries also did not accept this claimant. According to community members, Pakistan was the homeland to the community after partition of India as such ought to suffer directly for any wrong deeds done with the community. It is the Pakistan which is at fore front for anti Ahamdiyya activities and maximum anti- ahmadiyya atrocities are committed in this country. Further it is the only country where anti ahmadiyya legislation has been done and every day hundreds of thousands declare the founder of community as impostor.

    Analysis of prevalent state of affairs in Pakistan apparently supports the claim of Ahamdiyya Community. Is there anyone who can ponder on this point so that Pakistani nation can be told about truth. Quran is full of incidents where nations were wiped out due to atrocities committed against the messengers of God and their followers. Lest it becomes too late to realize, nation and its religious experts should wake up to consider this point.

  86. Mr Khan we ar already broken apart why you further tearing us apart. Have some mercy. Shia Hindu and Chritians all are suffering. Why they then?

  87. Keep such theories to yourself. World is very big and there are other causes to the miseries of Pakistanis. Do not mislead. Some times nations get bad times and then good times. Pakistan will also have soon good time. Let IK to resume power.

  88. @Aamir Mughal

    The same Qadiyani foreign Minister did not attended Quaid-e-Azam’s Nimaz e Janaza while being present on the occasions.

    He said either He is Kafir FM of an Islamic country or Muslim FM of a kafir country….

    In 1952 in Karachi Rally he declared Islam as dead religion and Qadiyaniat as alive….. I think history speaks for itself….

  89. AmericanHealthJournal is seeking partner websites in the medicine genre. American Health Journal is a medical web site containing over three thousand of high quality health videos. We are seeking partners who may be interested in content based partnerships. We can offer content exchanges, link exchanges, and exposure to your site. Come message us at our contact form on our web site.

  90. may god flood the Pakistan soon…all Pakistanis are kafir as they are representing my Islam in negative way to the rest of world.Islam z religion abt peace n.love bt wat Pakistanis are doing now tht z shame fr my lovely religion know as Islam who’s last messenger was profit Muhammad s.a.w . shame on u ppl belonging to tht worlds largest Islamic country shame on u…coz of u ppl rest of Muslims are supposed to keep their heads down in other communities like Hindus,Christians,Buddhist,Sikhs …ya Allah Pakistan ko is duniya ke naqshay maise gayib kar …

  91. Hi there just wanted to give you a quick heads up.
    The words in your content seem to be running off the screen in Safari.

    I’m not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with browser compatibility but
    I thought I’d post to let you know. The style and design look great though!
    Hope you get the issue resolved soon. Kudos

    Feel free to surf to my web-site: nike air max australia

  92. Hey! This is kind of off topic but I need some help from an established blog.
    Is it tough to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal
    but I can figure things out pretty fast. I’m thinking about creating my own but I’m not sure where to start.
    Do you have any points or suggestions? Many thanks

    Feel free to visit my website keymachine.De

  93. It’s perfect time to make a few plans for the longer term and it’s time to be
    happy. I have learn this submit and if I could I wish to recommend you few attention-grabbing
    things or advice. Maybe you can write next articles relating to this article.
    I wish to read more issues approximately it!

    My page: nike air max 97

  94. I think this is among the most vital information for me.
    And i am glad reading your article. But want to remark on few
    general things, The web site style is great, the articles is really excellent :
    D. Good job, cheers

    Feel free to surf to my homepage :: Installaxy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.