In rejection of fake liberals of Pakistan – by Sarah Khan
The pseudo-liberal is essentially a bigot who parades under the illusion of being a liberal while pursuing a non-liberal agenda. Pseudo-liberals of Pakistan are no less dangerous than terrorists, activists and supporters of the Taliban, Sipah-e-Sahaba, Jamaat-e-Islami and Hizbut Tahrir. In a way, pseudo-liberals are more harmful because while extremist Islamists are visibly despicable because of their hate ideology, pseudo-liberals are eating Pakistan and its civil society and institutions from inside in the guise of their ostensible commitment to liberal values (while providing unflinching support to institutions of power (army, bureaucracy, feudals and industrialists) of Pakistan).
As my friend Rabia once commented:
“…the Pakistani socially liberal elite has been (some may argue out of necessity) with very [few] exceptions, illiberal in its political preferences. One could argue that the success of grassroots political empowerment movements like the majlis-e-ahrar, the khatm-e-nabuwat movement, sipah-e-sahaba, etc, was a direct result of the vacuum left by the liberal elite’s unwillingness to engage with the public, i.e. it’s support of dictatorship and politics of patronage of feudals at the local level…So basically … a situation in which we have the complete failure of the liberal elite to give a shit about popular politics for 63 years and then it’s upset that the public space has been overtaken by undesirable elements.”
In my view, the best (or worst) moment to identify pseudo-liberals in Pakistani media and politics was when they decided to extend full support to Nawaz Sharif’s PML-N, Qazi Hussain Ahmed’s Jamaat Islami and Mir Shakil-ur-Rehman’s Geo News / Jang, in order to reinstall a grade 22 bureaucrat, Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, in his cherished seat in the Supreme Court of Pakistan, hijacking and manipulating a popular movement against a military dictator (General Musharraf) in which the PPP (Pakistan’s largest political party) offered most sacrifices. In the whole process, it was relatively easy to pinpoint and know the real faces of pseudo-liberals, who will always be remembered in annuls of Pakistan history.
There are a number of common features of this despicable group: aloofness from the working class, pride in English proficiency and accent, superiority complex, hegemonic ambitions, intolerance and autocratic ideas, benevolent sympathy for the disempowered, imitation of the west, hypocritical views, aimless lives and fake activism.
Another major problem with the Pakistani pseudo-liberals (mostly from upper and middle class) is that they sit in their lounges, drink coffee or whatever and opine about this that without any appreciation of ground realities.
There is a long list of pseudo-liberals in Pakistan, some of whose names are provided below. The list will be updated on a regular basis:
1. Mosharraf Zaidi
2. Shaheen Sehbai
3. Syed Iqbal Haider
4. Syed Mushahid Hussain
5. Dr Shireen Mazari
6. Syed Talat Hussain
7. Kamran Khan
8. Ahmed Quraishi
9. Adil Najam
10. Naveen Naqvi
11. Several liberal blogs (to be listed soon)
…………………….
The LUBP Pseudo-Liberal Archive
The remainder of this post is an archive of articles written by various authors in rejection of pseduo-liberals of Pakistan. You may wish to read these articles at your leisure.
………………
We shall overrun: The young, urban, middle-class Pakistani’s manifesto – by Nadeem Paracha and Abbas Baloch
Source: Dawn Blog, 20 March 2010
also posted on LUBP
1. Asif Ali Zardari is the devil incarnate.
2. The Pakistan Army is the saviour.
3. The Taliban are resisting American imperialism.
4. We hate American foreign policy unless it suits us. We are against American imperialism if it means we have to ditch the Taliban as that would be against the aspirations of our founding father, Mohammed Bin Qasim. We will no longer shop at Marks and Spencer because they are somehow connected to Israel. However, that does not mean we will switch off our computers and cell phones whose chip technology has been made possible due to major contributions from Israeli scientists.
5. We don’t want to sell our honour for American money unless it is for our private hospitals, textile exports, NGOs, or for completing degrees at American universities.
6. It’s not just Zardari who is the culprit. It’s also Benazir Bhutto and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. Fatima Bhutto is fine, though; she is dating George Clooney.
7. It was all milk and honey till Bhutto came along. Damn him for nationalising my father’s 15 mills, seven textile units, and 11 banks! I still remember the good old days when Nani ji, Dada ji and their friends brought hundreds of textile licenses from Gohar Ayub for US $ 200,000 a pop. There was no corruption and no labour unions until this Sindhi feudal and closet Hindu agent named Z.A. Bhutto came along and enforced his Zionist agenda and made all our urban serfs so uppity.
8. We are against feudalism unless the feudals in question do not support the PPP and allow us to rape the ecology of Sindh and the Punjab on our weekend hunting trips. Some crates of mangoes from their farms also help.
9. Some of us feel we know what’s best for the PPP, i.e. to banish Zardari and his kids and ditch the legacies of ZAB and BB. We have never voted for or supported the PPP (actually we never vote all!) but we still feel that we are in a better position to understand the party’s dynamics.
Also, as educated, refined and objective leaders and captains of industry, we are against dynastic politics. However, we are fine with Fatima Bhutto, Hamza Sharif, Solaiman/Essa Khan, Monis Chaudhary as well as the privileged alumni of Karachi Grammar School, Aitchison and Pakistan Military Academy, Kakul, ruling us. Just as long as they are not descended from the Zionist agent Benazir and her corrupt husband, Zardari.
10. Democracy is a deeply flawed system that has destroyed the world. Totalitarian monarchies with entrenched security and bureaucracies are much better and in line with our Arab origins. Please do not compare us to India. We have nothing in common with them except our DNA, culture, cuisine, language, music, and geography.
11. Our ideal form of government is the modern day Caliphate, or, as we like to call it, the rule of technocrats. In this form of government, our posh uncles will pass stern orders in their clipped Oxbridge accents and Italian suits that will be supported by a medieval council of jurists whom we like to call the independent judiciary.
12. Lately, we have been reading some Chomsky, Klein and Zinn (all five articles) and appreciate how these believing Muslims provide us with the intellectual ammo on exposing how the perfidious Jews conspire to rule the world.
13. We are essentially a good people who are suffering because the world wants to take over our nukes and is conspiring to destroy our country. They are using the Taliban, who themselves are essentially good people who are bravely fighting American imperialism.
The Taliban just suffer from bad press, and we know who controls the press abroad. Here, the press is controlled by democratically elected anchors and media analysts who are fighting for justice and against corruption.
14. The Taliban who are killed in the drone attacks are simply pious Muslims who are doing charity work, such as digging canals in arid, mountainous zones – it’s called the Mars project.
Also, the burning of Christian villages by Taliban affiliated and state-sponsored sectarian militias is a figment of the imagination of the liberal fascists. They are doing their best to curb crusaders of truth and justice such as Geo TV. The real problem is Blackwater/Xe, fools.
15. The Taliban are an expression of Pushtoon nationalism as they have done their best to cleanse the United Emirates of Peshawar and FARTA from pagan Pukhtoon influence. The Taliban are a legitimate resistance movement against the occupation of the United Emirates of Peshawar and FARTA by ANP, Shia parachinaris, Sikhs and, of course, female students. The only genuine Pathans are Imran Khan, Hamid Gul, and Zaid Hamid.
16. Sipah Sahaba, Jaish, Lashkar Taiba, Lashkar Jhangvi, Jamaat Islami … who the are they? Figments of the imagination of liberal fascists. We should be more concerned about the Ahmed Rashids, Kamran Shafis, Amir Mirs, Arif Jamals, Najam Sethis, Tarek Fatahs, Irfan Hussains, Pervaiz Hoodbhoys, Fasi Zakas, Ayesha Siddiquas, and Nadeem Parachas.… They are CIA agents.
17. India is stealing our water and is destroying the country via its Sindhi/Balochi/Pushtoon/Gilgiti/Hazara/Hingora/Makrani/Seraiki proxies. Damn this fifth column riff-raff. We brought them the glorious Islamic civilization from the latest Nasim Hejazi novel and look at how uppity they have gotten since. We gave them commerce (Gujrati), language (Urdu), and agriculture (Punjabi) and they still want to maintain their identities and celebrate their vernacular religious practices which our pure Arab background forbids. Feed them to the Taliban.
18. We, the members of civil society, are essentially a liberal lot who are imbued with socialist values. Our ability to engage in massive socialising (through Facebook) makes us socialist in the true sense of the word. Lately, we have also dabbled in Marxism at cafes where we blow off half a month’s average national salary on lattes and cappuccinos whilst we construct our neo- Marxism around the tacit acceptance of the Taliban’s superior Arab cultural identity. We salute Abul Ala Marx, Lenin Bin Laden, and Mulla Mao!
19. These are difficult times for civil society. While the tyrant Zardari is destroying the country with a ‘progressive agenda’ (another Zionist conspiracy) that involves legislation about women’s rights and the enfranchisement and autonomy of minority provinces, our brave and independent judiciary is fighting a Herculean battle to free the champions of our true Arab identity like Hafiz Saeed, Maulana Aziz, and Masood Azhar. These tireless crusaders are fighting our battle against Hindu hegemony in Pakistan. We need to applaud the efforts of the Chief Justice of the Lahore High Court in exposing the Hindus.
20. As Zardari loots and pillages Pakistan via the nefarious use of his handle bar moustache and cheery demeanour, we have to appreciate how our Taliban investment is saving our economy by killing thousands of our citizens and costing billions of dollars in damages and lost investment and trade opportunities. We are a financially and arithmetically gifted segment of society that can expand US $66 million to $1,500 million if it means that we can lynch Zardari (and free Aafia).
21. While our existential adversary India is investing billions of dollars in Afghanistan’s infrastructure and municipal training, we are using our billions to create the ultimate strategic depth in Afghanistan: macho Islamist brutes who will eventually recreate the Islamic State that made Afghanistan the model of peace and prosperity from 1996 till 2001.
In conclusion we would like to part with a speech from one of our greatest representatives, Zen Farman Wamid, which he made at the historic Dillee Kebab House. The topic of this grand speech was, “Today Dillee Kebab House, tomorrow Delhi Fort”:
“Assalamualaikum, my dear and superior Muslim Pakistanis. By the grace of God, I am proud to announce from this wonderful kebab house that we are now ready to invade India. This invasion has taken a lot of planning and effort by my young upwardly mobile comrades and for this we would also like to thank our friends in the electronic media and inspirations such as Yahya Khan and Ziaul Haq.
Dear muscular Muslim boys and petite Muslim girls, I had been planning this invasion for a very long time, even before my blessed birth when I was just a spirit floating over Pakistan – even before Pakistan was made. My spirit swooped down when it saw the great Muhammad Bin Qasim invading Sindh and defeating Hindu scoundrels as well as Mohajir, Sindhi, Balochi and Pakhtun nationalists.
We will vanquish them in the Islamic Emirate Caliphate of Punjab … I mean, Pakistan. Damn those who say that Pakistan was made in 1947. That’s a lie, I tell you. It was made in the seventh century, when Kalashnikov Bin Qasim, Allama F-16 Iqbal, and Inzimamul Haq defeated a million-strong army of that secular tyrant and usurper Raja Bhutto and his side-kick Mohindar Singh Dhoni and announced the creation of the Islamic Caliphate of Punj … I mean Pakistan.
So wake up, Pakistan, and let’s invade, loot and plunder like those great Muslim leaders, Mahmud Ghazni and Mr. T.
My next address to you all will be from Delhi Fort and anyone who disagrees is a traitor, a Hindu agent, or a student of the Peshawar University. Allah Hafiz! Punj … I mean, Pakistan, marhabba marhabba.”
This blog was co-authored by Nadeem F. Paracha and Abbas Baloch.
……….
Why pseudo liberals support army?
by Sayyed Ahmed Khan, Karachi
Source: The News
The pseudo liberals always support the Pakistan Army for being the strongest institution of the country. The fact of the strength of the army is that its command line originates from the British colonial forces.
The army, in view of the pseudo intellectuals’ support, makes sure that no institution can be more stronger than it.
This theory got the boost when General Zia-ul-Haq declared that Pakistan’s ideological frontiers would be safeguarded by the army. This means that foreign and domestic security policies should be formulated by the army rather than the civil institutions.
It is ironical that almost all the successive Prime Ministers of the country have so far been compelled to run the country like a municipal chairman, and this trend is being continued in a bid to strengthen the role of undemocratic forces into the civil affairs.
It is pertinent to mention here that the pseudo liberals always come forward to support the army as saying ‘Pakistan has no other way’. Not a single demand has so far been made by any pseudo liberal to hold army accountable for any crime.
The pseudo liberals assume that the army will root out corruption from the civil institutions, but they are perhaps not aware about the institution whose own accounting books are not safe as no other party checks them.
No pseudo liberal want to be classified as ‘racist’ that is why they look at the other way when the racist composition of Pakistani establishment is discussed.
The human rights organizations mostly raise those issues in the country for which they are funded. The raising of selective issues was more prominent in mid 90s in Sindh when extra-judicial killings were completely ignored by the Human Rights Commission.
These organizations take a great interest in raising the rape issues of women in a bid to earn money. The policies of these organizations are also being affected by the foreign donors. The membership of these organizations means that you should give them money regularly without contributing anything else.
Most pseudo liberals tend to credit one person with all the powers without any checks and balances in a hope that their ‘hero’ like Musharraf is their last chance to reach the destiny.
………
Intellectual Dishonesty of Pakistani (Pseudo-)Liberals
by Syed Alam
November 1, 2002
Source: Chowk
As a nation we suffer from a number of problems. In my view, the most critical among them is not the rising tide of narrow-mindedness or militancy (state-sponsored or otherwise), but the intellectual dishonesty in the liberal class which is supposed to counter the conservative one.
Liberals were not a confused lot in Zia’s period, because all classical leftist movements are marked by anti-religious forces. BB’c compromise in late 80s, and then Musharraf’s coup put liberals in a big dilemma and confusion (how can one liberal denounce a govt secularizing Pakistan?).
Everybody wants to see Pakistan progress. This article does not mean to discredit pseudo liberals intentions. I am sure Qazi Hussain wants to see Pakistan progress as much as any ultra leftist and liberal wants. The differences exist in the goals (what is ’progress’?) and the methodology (bottom-up or top-bottom, etc.)
The sudden rise of pseudo-liberals is a new phenomenon, and their dishonesty is evident in a number of issues, as following:
1. Pakistan army
Pakistan army has been the strongest institution that Pakistan has produced, mainly because of the fact that its command line comes from a particular martial race (more harmony, cohesion, and way of thinking), bred by British colonial forces in centuries. Their interests are same, and differences are amicably resolved, otherwise the dissenting fellow has to be exploded in air, or take a respectful exit. Pseudo Liberals (PL) always jump to Pakistan army’s support mainly because of its strength relative to the other weak institutions. Army seeing this fallibility of pseudo intellectuals, always make sure that no institution gets bigger than it, and this vicious circle goes on.
This adventurism got the boost and excuse when Zia declared that Pakistan’s ideological frontiers were also to be safeguarded by Army. This virtually meant that foreign and homes security policies should be run by army and no civil institution. So for the last 2 decades we had our PMs running the country like municipal chair persons, while the army was taking care of all internal and external security issues without any civilian checks.
In the mess of 9/11, pseudo liberals came forward in the army’s support saying that ’Pakistan has no other way’. So the biggest failures of two foreign polices were thus unaccounted for, on the pretext of lack of choices. The question is: if two foreign policies are based on jihad and Allah’s perceived help, then how come army used civilians as canon fodder in Kashmir and Afghanistan, but refused to be just another canon fodder? This exposes the hypocrisy of the army, conveniently ignored by pseudo-liberals. There is not a single demand by any pseudo liberal to hold army accountable for the crimes (most of them war crimes) committed in Kashmir, Bombay bomb blast, and Afghanistan. There is no question asked about how Indian underworld mafia leaders got refuge in Pakistan with Pakistani passports.
Another reason why our pseudo liberals support army is their assumption that army will get rid of Pakistan from civilian corruption. An institution whose own accounting books are not seen by any third party, whose few corruption cases were unveiled by civilian sources (mostly by ousted NS govt)—how can it assume this moral authority to audit others? Pseudo Liberals usually identify the problems/benefits of military regime and its dictatorship with one person (such as Musharraf), so that if the dictatorship fails, not the whole army is made responsible for this. In this way, the door remains open for more dictatorial adventurim by another ’mard-e-momin’.
2. Punjab domination
No pseudo liberal want to be classified as ’racist’, even when he is subject to racism. So all our Pseudo liberals look the other way when the racist
composition of Pakistani establishment is discussed. Civil administration in minority provinces can be all non-locals, Pakistan army and rangers and police can be non-locals, but pointing out this fact as simply a violation of the people’s right to have representative admin, is something that no pseudo-liberal would tend to discuss. We can look at the booklets of human rights organizations working in Pakistan, or most of national parties, opinion leaders in press, but we can not see anything about it. Only regional and nationalist parties raise this issue, and hence can easily be disregarded as anti-Pakistan. Civil unrest in Karachi of mid-90s and frequent disturbances in Baluchistan are all conveniently ignored with one excuse or other.
3. White-mentality (total disregard to local intellect)
If there is any mess like 9/11, they would like to listen to Naom Chomsky. If they have to believe that Jinnah was the statesman they would refer to some ’scholar’ in American/British university vouching for his strength of personality.
Not that these foreigners are bad people, but if the problem is yours, you got to sort it out yourself. If we do not have the intellect to come up with our own solutions then the problem can not be resolved by inviting others to resolve our crisis. Even in history, our PLs can refer to lot of white historians who can not speak any local language. Local historians and writers are completely disregarded.
4. Human Rights scenario
Human rights organizations mostly take the issues for which they are funded. Raising of selective issues was more prominent in mid 90s in Sindh, during MQM and army confrontation. Extra-judicial killing by state was completely ignored by Human Rights commission.
Incidents of rape of women, even though condemnable, are given much more energy and publicity because this is how these organizations earn money. The polices of these orgs are also effected by foreign donors (much like madrasas). Membership to these organizations mean that you just have to give them money regularly without contributing anything else. Who formulates their policies is anybody’s guess.
5. Meaning of Pakistan
What Pakistan should be? Pseudo Liberals jump to Jinnah’s statements to show that Pakistan was meant to be secular. Should Pakistan be what Jinnah wanted? Or anybody else? are we not negating the very meaning of democracy by that? Should we even discuss what Jinnah wanted (besides academic interest)?
The same questions go with other founding fathers like Iqbal.
6. Heroism vs Systematic Approach
Most pseudo liberals tend to credit one person with all the powers without any checks and balances, in the hope that something will work out, or in the desperation that we have no other way out, and the ’hero’ on the top is our last chance with destiny. Institutions are not supported but a hero is made out of a ruling person like Musharraf, or some aspirant like Imran Khan so that some ’magic’ would happen over night. This approach does not help society progress, no matter if a saint is ruling at the top. Any ’change’ in the system is always brought about by challenging the vested interests responsible for the status-quo.
7. Culture-Vulture
Traditional religion has miserably failed to satisfy the growing diversified needs of Pakistani middle class society. It has created many moral issues and dilemmas, which can not be resolved by any ’broad-minded’ interpretation of traditional religion (as the evolution of religion is possible in a free society not stuck up with its past and origin). This dilemma forced many educated liberals to look at other alternatives (among leaving the religion altogether).
The culture of saints (sufism) is the one preferred by some liberals. It has been acclaimed more in the music industry like that of Junoon group, Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan, etc. Imran Khan of Insaaf part and Salman Ahmed (of Junoon group) sort of represent this pseudo intellectual group. Their thinking, statements and professional activitities all point to the hollowness of their intellect. Saints are presented in Junoon’s music and video as the ultimate prophet of humanity. This is another story that most of these saints were half mad, junky and frustrated people. Their ascent to priesthood was mainly the result of a backward and superstitious society of illiterate people. But this would not sell, would it?
Besides the promotion of ’sufism’, the other cultural ’progress’ has always been in the Americanization of things. So it is not just enough to understand and speak English, but it is also necessary to use the American accent and slang. This is understandable given the dominant American economics and media, but the off shoots of this mentality are manifolds, including: Formulation of major national policies by Toms, Dicks and Harries of American Pakistanis (mainly because it is easy to get foreign funding this way).
……….
Meet the opportunists: Cultural dynamics of Pakistan fashion industry – by Nadeem Paracha
Source: Dawn, 13 May 2010
Posted on LUBP
I have never been able to understand the cultural dynamics of what is called the Pakistan fashion industry, particularly the notion of holding ‘fashion weeks’ which, at least to me, seem to last for months.
There is nothing new in saying that the so-called Pakistan fashion scene constitutes the minutest percentage of the population when we start counting the number of designers, models, ‘fashion journalists,’ and audience members for fashion shows in this country. Their activities carry not an iota of social relevance whatsoever.
To me they’re quite a useless bunch and I am sure after reading this they would be thinking the same way about me as well. Fair enough.
However, I do have the right to raise a few questions when the enthusiastic fashionistas – who entirely exist in a colourful timeless void – go on to make statements to the effect that they are ‘defying extremism’ and how their events have more to do with matters of business and economics than mere, decedent entertainment.
Well, in no way are these jazzy events akin to a bunch of cosmetic ladies and men standing up to the specter of extremism. The truth is this (albeit widely covered) fringe has always been around. They were there even during the most myopic and reactionary days of one General Zial Haq as well. Thus, even if this country’s military, politicians and people do manage to fail themselves by whining out democracy and submitting to monsters like the Taliban, it is my guess, Pakistan would still be holding fashion weeks.
These trendy folks, about whom we are forced to read and see so much of in our newspapers and on TV, are actually quite a miniature lot. Their existence in the public eye is mainly due to the fact that they make great eye candy and software for Sunday papers to splash their pages with.
But like I said, even if we have Mullah Omar as our ruler, blowing away the heads of poor ‘underclass’ women for daring to take a peek from their jet-black burqas, or chopping off the hands of men who dare to shave, the fashionistas would be holding a fashion week at some big shot’s haveli because that big shot will most probably have some friends or connections in the Mullah’s brigade.
And anyway, the class these fashion kings and queens belong to would probably be the first to exit a burning, turning Pakistan.
Some might ask, should not a liberal man like me, who wants to see his country evolve into one of the most dynamic, diverse, and democratic nations in the Muslim world, feel happy when events like fashion weeks take place in this country during such testing times?
I’m afraid not. Like I said, these fashionista types have always been around and never have they managed to exhibit the kind of relevant meat (pun not intended) required for reviving the country’s cultural health.
This can only be done through the aggressive promotion of things like popular theatre and cinema, indigenous folk music (of all the languages that are spoken in this country), literature that clearly reflects the political, economic and social challenges of the times, and debates on faith and national identity involving accomplished intellectuals, historians, politicians and the masses, and not papaya-faced cranks masquerading as talk show hosts or ‘experts’ on TV.
Dances with wolves
The other day while flipping through the gazillion TV channels out there, I stopped for a while at a channel that was covering this year’s ‘Pakistan Fashion Week.’ Lo and behold! I noticed that one of the sponsors of the event was a foreign bank that recently laid-off hundreds of its employees as a ‘cost cutting measure.’ Now, why (rather how) would an organisation that is willing to dump many of its employees to cut cost, end up paying for a floozy event like a fashion week?
There you go then. In addition to Mullah Omar’s rule, even if the nation is facing an economic meltdown, there will always be some rich corporate dude willing to keep the wheels of ‘fashion’ turning. ‘Social responsibility’ they call it in corporate lingo. Model citizens, indeed (pun intended).
Supposedly the Pakistani ‘fashion scene’ (sometimes audaciously called an ‘industry’) has grown manifold, but it has never fought against the forces that want to clamp down on it. How can they? This batch of hip liberals in the shape of fashionistas and pop musicians is the third in line of a generation, most of whose parents quietly went along with the Zia regime after greatly benefiting from all that American and Saudi money floating around during the dictatorship.
This ubiquitous minority was quietly allowed by the ‘Islamic’ regime to have their parties, booze, and fashion shows behind closed doors, as Zia’s moral brigade went about harassing the majority in the name of “purging vulgarity from society.” The economics of this class was never threatened. And anyways, culturally, they already had their little Paris, New Yorks, and Londons operating in their drawing rooms.
But of course, this was/is a highly opportunistic class as well. Because the moment things started to open up, especially during the second Benazir Bhutto government, the second generation of this class of hipsters suddenly arrived upon the scene with their catwalks, guitars and what not because there was good money to be made. However, the moment the second Benazir government fell, so did (for a while) that hyped “cultural revolution” this class was chanting about from concert halls, catwalks, and award ceremonies. And since most among this generation of hip liberals were bought up in apolitical, tight. and compartmentalised elite environments by their prospering parents, they had no clue what had hit them.
One example I would like to quote here of such a scenario is when, in February 1997, the second Nawaz Sharif government took over, and I actually saw members of a band celebrating the coming of a new era!
Though most of their contemporaries in the fashion industry and the music scene had absolutely no idea how politics worked and what it meant to have a ‘Ziaist’ back at the helm, those who tried could not go beyond knee-jerk reactions based on speculative political gossip and conspiracy theories originating in cosy drawing rooms.
Well, many years and openings later the scene is quite the same. The opportunists are out in force courting brand new TV channels, FM stations, fashion shows, and the music scene. There maybe newness in how openly they are operating, but there is not an iota of substance in their “cultural events” that can actually challenge the obscurantist mentality and forces that challenge them. In fact, sometimes the case is quite the contrary.
Thus, my suggestions to the fashionistas would be to stay the heck away from making political statements. By suggesting that you are ‘challenging extremism,’ you are actually sounding as silly and dunce-like as those long-haired (and, indeed, bald) rock stars of ours who ended up sounding like well-fed drawing room fascists in a recent video by The New York Times.
Anyone for Pathanay Khan or Reshma, instead?
When pop ate itself
According to my own experience as a journalist covering the Pakistan music scene in the 1990s, it is never a good idea to encourage pop musicians to start making political statements. As an idea it can be exciting, but since much of the modern pop music scene in Pakistan originates from middle-class settings, one can thus expect nothing more than self-righteous droning and quasi-reactionary demagoguery usually found in the urban bourgeoisie and petty-bourgeois sections of society.
Surveys and studies of these two classes in Pakistan show them to be among the most conservative, with a history of backing assorted military dictators (especially Ziaul Haq and Pervez Musharraf). Of course, there have also been clear exceptions in this regard, but it is true that over the years the overall conservatism of these classes has seen certain sections from within become both supporters and financiers of the more extreme strains of Islamic thought.
There have been recorded cases against many middle-class shop-owners and traders for financing jihadi organisations; whereas many sections among the more ‘modern’ bourgeois class have largely exhibited their own version of extreme beliefs by passionately patronising (as supporters and clients) a number of Islamic televangelists and drawing-room preachers whose numbers have grown two-fold from 1990 onwards.
Consequently, there has also been a dramatic increase in the number of young men and women from the middle-class now preferring to adorn beards and hijabs, and taking religious rituals a lot more seriously (compared to the situation till the late 1970s). But this class still constitutes a large number of ‘westernised’ youth as well.
However, compared to their more socially conservative class contemporaries — who have been seen to follow right-wing groups from the Jamaat-i-Islami to the supposedly defunct Sipah-i-Sahaba, from the Sunni Tehreek and the Tableeghi Jamaat to individuals such as Dr Israr Ahmed and Amir Liaquat — the more ‘modern’ lot in this respect have not exactly fallen to the left as a reaction (like they did between the 1950s and the early 1970s). Instead, in spite of whole-heartedly embracing the economic, aesthetic, and cultural fruits of liberal economics and politics, they have retained their class’ inherent political conservatism.
Many western journalists and Pakistanis alike are now trying to understand why, for example, many educated, westernised, and modern Pakistani pop/rock stars and their fans are all gung-ho about anti-Americanism but at the same time keep quiet about matters such as religious extremism, terrorism, and the Taliban.
The funny thing is, this is happening even when there are disturbingly tangible and physical examples of the ubiquitous carnage and mayhem being caused by so-called jihadis; whereas conspiratorial notions such as the ever-present explanation of a ‘foreign hand’ remains a largely unsubstantiated and thus somewhat air-headed perception. Adam Ellick’s interviews with former rock star turned loud reactionary mutt, Ali Azmat, and bubblegum-rock poster boy, Ali Noor, in his NYT video feature are the cases in point.
Both hail from modern, middle-class settings and represent the more westernised sections of the Pakistani bourgeoisie. In spite of overtly mimicking the aesthetic, cultural, and linguistic strains of western pop culture, both refuse to see any contradiction whatsoever in conveniently attacking ‘western imperialism’ as the reason behind the terror attacks in Pakistan.
Azmat is seen in a T-Shirt and shorts, with an expensive Apple laptop by his side, sitting in a room decorated like an arty version of an American college dude’s bachelor pad, and the following is what he had to say: ‘It (suicide bombing) is the agenda of neocons to de-Islamise Pakistan…’
In his recently acquired wisdom (which, according to columnist Fasi Zaka, Azmat gained “from watching a total of two YouTube documentaries” and following the rhetoric of Azmat’s newfound guru, Zaid Hamid) Azmat is convinced that the Taliban are not behind the bombings of girls’ schools, but “foreign forces (CIA, RAW and Mossad),” are to be blamed!
Where else but in Pakistan can one find a rock star with a history of being a ‘party animal’ and lucratively sponsored by various western multinationals become a shameless and witless apologist of men who in the name of faith not only blow themselves up in public, but are also known to have used three-to-six-year-old children for the same deed.
Then, in the same documentary, we see yet another scion of the increasingly warped Pakistani bourgeoisie, Ali Noor, the long-haired, guitar-slinging lead vocalist of Noorie. Amidst terrifying footage of blown-up cars, shops, and body limbs, he announces that “the Taliban only constitute a tiny problem.” And, of course, it is the Americans who are to be blamed. While spouting this profound insight, Noor gestures the ‘tiny’ part of his grand statement with his hand and you wonder, shouldn’t that gesture be explaining the size of his brain? No wonder he is incapable of realising the irony of him now appearing on TV to plug cones made by a western multinational.
Is all this symptomatic of mere delusion, or of some unprecedented form of collective psychosis that this class is now suffering from? I think ‘educated,’ westernized, modern idiots like the failed Times Square bomber, Faisal Shahazad, have the answer. In fact, I think he is the answer.
Nadeem F. Paracha is a cultural critic and senior columnist for Dawn Newspaper and Dawn.com.
………..
Nice Article Hope For The Best
Masood Ashar’s article is written for extremist Islamists but is equally applicable to liberal fascists:
ہمارا دشمن ہمارے اندر ہے ….. آئینہ…مسعود اشعر
اشفاق احمد کہا کرتے تھے کہ پاکستان کو نقصان پڑھے لکھوں نے پہنچایاہے، ان پڑھ لو گوں نے نہیں پہنچایا۔ ہم ان سے لڑتے تھے اور بحث کرتے تھے۔ لیکن وہ اتنا غلط بھی نہیں کہتے تھے ۔حکومت اور سیاست ہمیشہ ان لو گوں کے ہاتھ میں ہی رہی جنہیں پڑھا لکھا کہا جا تا ہے۔ ان پڑھ لو گوں کو اس مقام تک رسائی ملی ہی کب۔مگر اس بحث میں ہم یہ بھول جاتے ہیں کہ جنہیں ہم پڑھا لکھا کہہ رہے ہیں وہ پڑھے لکھے نہیں ہیں بلکہ نیم خواندہ ہیں ۔ اور اگر ہمارے بزرگوں کی یہ بات صحیح ہے کہ نیم حکیم خطرئہ جان اور نیم ملا خطرئہ ایمان ہو تا ہے تو نیم خواندہ لوگ بھی پورے معاشرے اور پورے ملک کے لئے خطرہ ہو سکتے ہیں ، اور خطرہ ہیں ۔ میں یہاں جعلی ڈگریوں کی بات نہیں کر رہا ہوں۔سچی بات تویہ ہے کہ جن لو گوں کے پاس اصلی ڈگریاں ہیں ان کی اکثریت بھی نیم خواندہ ہے کہ ہمارے اسکولوں، ہمارے کالجوں اور ہماری یونیورسٹیوں میں جو پڑھایا جا رہا ہے اس سے نیم خواندہ لو گ ہی نکل سکتے ہیں، اور نکل رہے ہیں۔یہ نیم خوادہ لوگ تنگ نظر ہیں، تنگ دل ہیں اور کوتاہ فکر ہیں ۔اب یہاں اشفاق احمد سے اتفاق کئے بغیر بھی چارہ نہیں کہ ان پڑھ آدمی شہر کا ہو یا گاؤں کا وہ تنگ نظر اور تنگ دل نہیں ہوتا۔ اس کے جو بھی عقائد ہوتے ہیں ان میں عالی ظرفی اور فراخ دلی موجود ہو تی ہے ۔وہ کسی عقیدے اور کسی مسلک سے نفرت نہیں کرتا۔اس کا سلوک سب کے ساتھ محبت اور اخوت کا ہو تا ہے ۔ اس کے دماغ میں یہ خناس نہیں سمایاہوتا کہ صرف میں ہی حق پر ہوں
http://search.jang.com.pk/details.asp?nid=447646
Seems good to reject pseudo-liberals, many of whom in this list actually deserve to be exposed, but what about those pseudo-socialists and pseudo-leftists who declare Taliban as rural , indigenous flag bearers of a class-war and spend more time condemning USA and Isarel than the atrocities of Taliban against Pakistani civilians (many of whom belong to working class)?
There is a whole segment of Pakistani left that does not even condemn the Taliban attacks on Pakistani people.
I good topic but made too messy! There can be one or two supporting articles not whole encyclopaedia. To disagree with NFP analysis is not quite easy though.
Dont try to terrorise the media as ur boss “Zurdari” has also failed to do so ,media people are true representation of our country and the way this country should be.
Sara, I think Mosharraf Zaidi is the entire category of one for this designation. He’s the only one who can fit the category of liberal. And liberals are distinguished by talking only.
The remainder like Shaheen Sehbai and Mushahid Hussain are old fashioned lotas and along with everyone on that list, with some exceptions, I have never read and have no intention of reading.
The exceptions are:
1) Ahmed Quraishi and Shireen Mazari are not Liberal. Their political rants fall in the old fashioned ultra-conservative/militaristic part of the political spectrum. More importantly, and much, much worse, they are mouthpieces for the intelligence agencies. They deserve, and have, a category of shame all to their own.
2) Adil Najam doesn’t deserve to be on this list. He’s not a politically forward guy and his website Pakistaniat.com is more of a clearing house for various bits of info on Pakistan, with a positive-ish spin. He is doing a job promoting Pakistan that should be done by the media or the government. He’s harmless, and doesn`t deserve unfair tarring.
3) Talat Hussain, on his TV show, and his Newsline articles, doesn`t pretend to be liberal. He goes more for the western concept of journalistic balance.
4) Sara, this sounds like a threat: “Several liberal blogs (to be listed soon)”. LUBP shouldn`t go around making threats.
By the way, I should mention, liberals talk. Progressives act. What you are looking for are progressives. You won`t find many of those in Pakistan`s newsrooms.
You seem to have forgotten about that particular “liberal” part of the Pakistani elite which claims to be socialist, yet holds thousands of acres of land worked by near-starving serfs. Those who speak of “women’s lib” yet act in opposition to it, those who crow about democracy, yet are afraid of being elected to a party office themselves and arrange for mini coup d’etat to ascend to the “throne” as it were.
Those who are supposedly from the “new” generation, educated in the best institutions of the west, yet have no problem whatsoever taking over a political party as if it were a family heirloom.
The fact is that there is nothing “liberal” about the Pakistani Elite. The Pakistani “Elite” is a group of vulture-like upper class which consists of Military Generals, Overfed and fattened Mullahs, Bureaucrats and Feudals and they are in cahoots with each other to keep power at any cost.
If it serves their purpose to become Jihadi’s … they do so, each playing the good cop/bad cop routine. If it serves their purpose to fight for “capitalism”, they also do that effortlessly.
The one, un-changing and eternal cornerstone of their psyche and modus operandi is an unflinching capacity to exploit, subjugate and dominate the majority of Pakistani society, at any cost and by any means necessary.
They are not socialists, they are not “religious leaders”, they are not liberals, they are not merely fascists. They are opportunists, thieves and vultures. To label them “liberal” or “jihadi” is to completely miss the point and the severity of the situation at hand.
@yaseen The media are not representative of Pakistan. That would be the Parliament.
@Awais: “those pseudo-socialists and pseudo-leftists who declare Taliban as rural , indigenous flag bearers of a class-war and spend more time condemning USA and Isarel than the atrocities of Taliban against Pakistani civilians”
In principle, I agree. Can you please list a few and any evidence / links of their rants for readers and my benefit. Thank you.
@Nadeem,
I wrote in the above article (now highlighted in bold):
The remainder of this post is an archive of articles written by various authors in rejection of pseduo-liberals of Pakistan. You may wish to read these articles at your leisure.
@TLW
Here is my broad definition: The pseudo-liberal is essentially a bigot who parades under the illusion of being a liberal while pursuing a non-liberal agenda.
I know the lines are blurry, and there is a lot of internal heterogeneity in the list I mentioned, you will agree that in one aspect or the other, all of them fit the definition of psuedo-liberal.
All of them appear to be modern, are eloquent in English language, are highly educated, at times use vocabulary and terms of western liberal discourse etc, yet they are known for pursuing a hypocritical and conservative agenda.
2. Here is my take on Adil Najam. In my view, he is a typical case:
http://criticalppp.com/archives/17645
3. I agree with the following view of Talat Hussain:
http://criticalppp.com/archives/17407
4. “Sara, this sounds like a threat: “Several liberal blogs (to be listed soon)”. LUBP shouldn`t go around making threats.”
haha. No threat was intended to any one. After all, we all are comrade bloggers!
@zul-jinnah
“They are not socialists, they are not “religious leaders”, they are not liberals, they are not merely fascists. They are opportunists, thieves and vultures. To label them “liberal” or “jihadi” is to completely miss the point and the severity of the situation at hand.”
I am inclined to agree with your view that’s why I used the term pseudo-liberal, instead of liberal.
They are opportunists, thieves and vultures.
Why thank you, son.
Excellent post, Sara. Even more excellent were comments by TLW. I completely agree with him.
Musharraf Zaidi is neither liberal nor whatever. I seriously think he’s confused. And putting ppl like Navin Naqvi and Ahmad Quereshi there … not good idea. To begin with they’re niether journos nor columnists. One of then (AQ) was imposed (by we know who) on The News, while the other writes for a newspaper, Express Tribune, which nobody takes seriously. I mean, Navin Naqvi?? Gimme a break.
I agree with what you have said about others on the list.
On the subject of the articles you have shared on anti-psuedo-liberals, well, of course NFP has always been on the forefront. He is not liberal, though, but rather (echoing TLW), a progressive.
Even though I think he is sometimes to dismissive of religious parties, and too supportive of PPP and MQM, in my view he remains to be one of the most insightful and powerful writers in Pakistani journalism.
My 2 cents. Keep up the good work.
Here is yet another pseudo-liberal, Dr Mubashir Hassan. No wonder Bhutto was hanged and these people were enjoying their flirtation with the martial law:
Dr Mubashir Hasan: Establishment’s latest pawn in the ‘war on democracy’
http://criticalppp.com/archives/2280
Another classic case is when all the pseudo-liberals lined up to make fun of Meera’s English:
I do not understand what was disgusting in Meera’s video. Why people found it so worthy of made fun of?
How is she supposed to speak a language that she did not have an opportunity to learn? Sure, we can make an argument that like any smart person, she should have leant it by now since she has to speak English so frequently.
But then, let us not forget to look in the mirrors ourselves. How many things in life each of us has mastered that we should have mastered?
If she had spoked Chinese wrong, no one will make fun of her since it is only the English language we are obsessed with as a nation. And not only us, whole world is.
Not being able to speak and write good English is considered a big deficiency that people try to hide. Not being able to speak good English makes them feel inferior.
Some say that it is the inferiority complex given by British rule. I personally think that it is due to the fact that people who are able to speak good English are usually those people who are able to attend expensive English medium schools, they are richer, it is class complex.
And of course if you are more educated, then you speak good English well as well.
So, superior wealth and higher level of education that is indirectly related to good English speaking, creates this superiority or inferiority complex in people.
Coming back to making fun. So, I am not capable to make fun of anyone who did not learn English. It is just that. They did not learn English. Like I did not learn a lot of things.
I can not swim, ride horses and I can not play any musical instruments and of course, there is a lot of English that I still need to learn.
Meera she is!
17 11 2009
by Shazia Habib
http://iaoj.wordpress.com/2009/11/17/meera-she-is/
Dear Author:
I think it is unfair to include Mr. Talat Hussain in the list of your target pseudo-liberal. After all, if being “pseudo” liberal is not good, then being “liberal” may not be so good for some other people.
Do we have an indigenious ideology that is not imported from outside? Do we have punjabi who is proud of wearing dhoti/pagri and Sindhi proud of wearing sindhi topi etc.?
The issue is that various strata of society are ashamed of themselves and some of them think western culture/values are good, and others like the pseudo-islamics thinks that imported turban and silly lafafa like arabic dress is the right mode.
The truth is that both are impressed by a fake and foreign culture. Yes this land is filled by Muslims but we have our own unique identity and being Muslim maybe just one part of that multi dimensional identity. Molvi group wants to make us into arabs and the so called elites look to a superficial following of the west or western values . everyone considers a punjabi or pashtun or sindhi cultured person as inferior and somehow “un-cultured”. That is our real tragedy.
neither the wahabi mullah group nor the liberal or psoudo liberal group represent the mainstream of Pakistan.
Dear Akhtar:
I think “english medium” gets a bad rap. Is Jamshed Dasti really an “english medium” type? He is the classical ujad ganwar insaan who has power solely because his ancestors were clever enough to side with the ruling foreigners of the times, aka the British (against their own fellow countrymen)
The issue is feudalism and class based exploitation. Let us not make it into a english/urdu medium issue.
Comment received via Pakistan Press group:
I find it hard to disagree with this email. Liberal or not, we have to agree on some very fundamental values and principles. Many of so-called leberals are very much part of the corrupt elites that dominate Pakistan’s state institutions today. They are corrupt, decadent, anti-people, and can’t change the status quo because they are very much part of it. If ZAB was alive today, they would have decalared him a conspiracy theorist because he had decalred on the floor of the National Assembly that the agitation against his government was a massive and a colossal international conspiracy to destablise Pakistan. We need nationalist liberals like Bhutto who can emphatise with the common people, their woes, their interests, and engage them in the political process and not the SUV brand designer politicians and media people who have pushed a lot of common folks to religious groups because the ordinary people see them as corrupt and rich guys who have nothing in common with the masses. It is about time that true spirit and values of the PPP of ZAB are revived.
Farrukh Siddiqui
http://groups.google.com/group/pakistanpress?hl=en-GB
@ironic
Thanks for very kind words.
I agree that NFP is one of the most insightful and “progressive” writers in Pakistani journalism, and a nightmare not only for Islamic fascists but also for pseudo-liberals.
@Rajab Ali
I agree with your assertion that both pseudo-liberals and pseudo-Islamists are impressed by a fake and foreign culture; both of them are distant from indigenous culture and values.
well Talat does not fit in the list, i think he is only included because he expose Govt. failures, he is not biased , but writer seems to be biased in favour of PPP which is understandable
@imran
This might help:
Talat Hussain Archive on LUBP:
Written by the ISI, adapted by Syed Talat Hussain – by Abdul Nishapuri
http://criticalppp.com/archives/17407
Farrukh Sohail Goindi’s letter about Syed Talat Hussain
http://criticalppp.com/archives/12747
An open letter to Talat Hussain: Will you lead a Freedom Flotilla to stranded Shias in Pakistan’s Gaza, Parachinar?
http://criticalppp.com/archives/12380
Faisal Shahzad’s case and Pakistan’s conspiracy brigade
http://criticalppp.com/archives/10640
Commenters expose Talat Hussain’s hypocrisy!
http://criticalppp.com/archives/9776
Three pictures, a column and the mindset of Syed Talat Hussain
http://criticalppp.com/archives/5977
Clinton’s encounter with media and Talat Hussain’s $640 million mistake
http://criticalppp.com/archives/1576
Hillary Clinton’s meeting with the ‘ghairatmand’ journalists: A summary
http://criticalppp.com/archives/1571
@ Rajab Ali
Dear Rajab, Dasti is not a feudal by any stretch of imagination. Please investigate yourself.
Not all English-medium receive a bad rap, only pseudo-liberals do, for obvious reasons.
Okay why are the following people not on your list?:
– Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto – the secular liberal who made Pakistan an “Islamic Republic”, outlawed alcohol and declared Ahmedis as Kafirs. The champion of the workers and peasants who abandoned them for the sake of fat cat industrialists and feudals; who initiated the brutal clampdown of the organized labour movement before Zia (see 1972 Karachi labour unrest).
– Salman Taseer, the liberal and champion of the poor who is a business tycoon that refuses to pay salaries to his employees in the Daily Times on time (his late father Dr M.D. Taseer would be rolling in his grave).
you get the picture. same can be said about Asif Zardari, Zulfiqar Mirza, Siraj Durrani, Abida Hussain (the liberal who thinks feudalism is good for Pakistan), etc etc etc
DISCLAIMER: I am neither a supporter of the people listed by Sara Khan, not an opponent of the PPP. I just think we need to be fair when picking out who to label “pseudo-liberal”.
Seems like anyone who has ever written anything against the government is on this list. By this account, NFP should be on this list too. You seem to have cherry-picked his articles. And Adil Najam! He is completely apolitical!
…and what exactly is a pseudo-liberal.
WHat is the fuss about?
Psydoliberal is the term used for fake intellectuals who pose to be liberal. The regime introduced by Pervez Musharaf, some self-styled policy advocates, Taliban mouth piece ‘Aunties’, fake liberals whose liberalism is limited to fashion shows, some mixed parties and then on TV screens and in media pose to be intellectuals.
One thing is common in these all, that they would adopt the line of pro-taliban agencies. Good Taliban and Bad Taliban, whole wolrd is out to take Nuclear weapons of Pakistan, American, CIA, Mosad, Raw, India, Jamica, Palastine and Tumbaktoo, everyone on earth is hatching conspiracy against Pakistan.
The mom-pop style idiots who receive written material from agencies and get it published in their names. The group of fake intellectuals on agencies payroll. They have common characteristic and one’s writing or hate speech can not be differentiated from other.
What is wrong in discussing them as they claim to be public figures? Does freedom of speech is limited to them to milign every one else and they are holly cows. Get a life, let people know who they are!
I think you do quite an injustice when you include Naveen Naqvi, Mosharraf Zaidi and few others on the list. I’m unable to comprehend how exactly you are calling people pseudo-liberals? Is it another inclusive category, a customized one, to exclude those sitting at the benches of PPP and including every media men writing something criticizing the government? From what I’ve read on Naveen Naqvi’s blog, her views comes off as quite rational and progressive. I wonder what is it that we are looking here when branding people psudo-liberals or not so.
Can The Left Become Relevant To Islamic Pakistan?
Pervez Hoodbhoy
New Politics
Vol:XIII-1 Summer 2010
Let me state the bald truth: Pakistan needs reform not revolution. The Left needs to know that there is not a chance in a million of capturing state power in the foreseeable future. In fact, the only ones who can even conceivably bring about a revolution are the Islamists. And their revolution is to be dreaded because they will wipe out every little gain made in sixty years. Therefore the Left must pick its fights, and not try to fight everyone at the same time.
At a time when the country needs clarity of thought, one must not look at everything through the prism of fossilized ideologies. Nor should one pose moralistic questions like: “Is America good or bad?” Of course America is just as selfish as most other countries, has repeatedly committed aggression overseas, has worsened the Palestine problem, and maintains the world’s largest military machine. We also know that it will rush to make a deal with the Taliban if that is perceived to be in its self-interest, and will do so even if that means abandoning the people of Afghanistan to blood-thirsty fanatics. But for Pakistanis the important question is: what are the options for Pakistan’s people today?
Instead of chasing demons, Pakistan’s leftists need to reaffirm their allegiance to what truly matters: the ideals of economic justice, secularism, universalistic ideas of human rights, good governance, women’s rights, and rationality in human affairs. Washington must be firmly resisted, but only when it seeks to drag Pakistan away from these goals. It is futile to frame the debate in pro- or anti-America terms; the key point is to be pro-people. The Left has a hugely important role to play in setting the moral compass. Only then will it matter to Pakistan.
http://newpolitics.mayfirst.org/print/node/339
Useful to me.
Terrific page and simple to fully understand explanation. Can I link this content on my site.
In rejection of fake liberals of Pakistan – by Sarah Khan
[url=http://www.gq5x2794hf6d9p51q8dn0g3269lpk8sts.org/]uvyxwsbvngm[/url]
avyxwsbvngm
vyxwsbvngm http://www.gq5x2794hf6d9p51q8dn0g3269lpk8sts.org/
ゴローズ さん
ナイキ 春 梨花
クロムハーツ ブレス白
オークリー 愛眼
ティソ 名古屋
ハミルトン ペア 2015
ゴヤール 透明ビニール
ダンヒル ジャンパー
ハミルトン x-02
テンデンス 名古屋 zippo専門店
トリーバーチ 倉敷店舗
ヘルメット オーダーメイド
アシックス レスリング
ジミーチュウ サンダル 通販
エミリオプッチ グアム dfs
iPhone 白か黒か
フィットフロップ エレクトラ new
アノラック ミリタリー wip
カルティエ ヘビ
ニューバランス 製造
ブルガリ 指輪 5万
ティンバーランド 50代
wow gold auf bank
ゼロハリバートン 5インチ usb3.0
iPhone にチャーム
財布 プチプラ ccクリーム
fitflop due aaa
d&g 格安
万年筆 インク 濃淡
アナスイ 箱
カシオ ex-10
ゼロハリバートン 免税店 dior
ズッカ 時計 メンズ amazon
オークリー 手袋 青
ジミーチュウ 店舗 イタリア
mcm 財布 レザー
iwc コピー 0を表示しない
ティファニー ドレス
wow gold hack bot
ロエベ 札入れ
ザノースフェイス 、プリマ ワンピース
mcm 財布 blog
ヘルメット フルフェイス 白
靴 風水 捨てる
ドクターマーチン サンダル 在庫
ヴィヴィアン サマンサ 財布値段
コンバース 紺
フルラ スマホ手袋
ズッカ 時計 通販
テンデンス 新作 996
ヴィトン 3指輪
gucci 型番
アシックス 3d測定会
citizen 腕時計 防水
イルビゾンテ 牛革 バッグ
furla 絵本
ボッテガ 革ジャン
トリーバーチ 財布店舗
フェラガモ バッグ30だい
ティンバーランド 30003
diesel 時計コピー
サマンサ 本社勤務
The entire buy wow gold are really precisely what you wished. Modern with wow gold start looking. Like people.
マーク 時計 ハワイ
ロンシャン フランス安
イルビゾンテ 6穴リフィル
orient 03755
外反母趾 靴 千葉
miumiu 財布 ss
ポール スミス ベルト21
トゥミ 名古屋 高島屋
アディダス おしゃれ服
ティンバーランド ox
ラルフローレン ドーナッツ
fitflop uk size 2
フェリージ 青山店 ランチ
シチズン 電波時計 掛け時計
celine シャツ
バッグ 作り方 line
アノラック ハイランドパーク ヴァルハラコレクション
ルブタン 六本木 7番
ロベルタ スカルパ チェルビーノ
トリーバーチ 服 dlc
ティンバーランド ハイカー
フォリフォリ リング led
セイコー ダイバー 伝説 http://www.cdo23.idv.tw/asvhvktjayu/impress4wloodrgcoan4ram2-xnd2erah0-tangibly4seiko.html
スウォッチ 一年で止まる http://nitiudyog.com/kkwhm/4126-SWATCH.html
万年筆 細字 中字 http://www.gardenshop.com.ua/ylz/qvcg-4841-634-49.html
カルティエ 金ベルト http://www.naibaat.com.pk/nkx/jixg-2670-094-23.html
ミッシェルクラン ネクタイ http://www.matouqin.com/domestic-48547-gkxj.html
timex vs rolex ヴィンテージ http://www.ccnara.com/nSg81/ZEBM-luexuzji-0760.html
クロエ 3次スキル http://pedrazzi.brinkster.net/xzssrgjp-gurntit_chloe_chloe.html
トリーバーチ の妹会社 http://timesuptees.com/seasickness-60025-eqio.html
テンデンス 名古屋 女性 http://hiromi.50webs.com/mjq/wwfm-9966-911-65.html
オークリー si ブーツ
万年筆 m400 ペン先
ロエベ メンズ名刺入れ
フェラガモ ベルト 偽物
ティファニー ルシダ 刻印
ゴヤール パリ 免税
シチズン ledチップ
テンデンス 流行 songs
フェリージ トレンチコート
ズッカ 腕時計 スマイル bump
フェラガモ 財布 エナメル
ニューバランス ベビー
ジバンシー 2ch まとめ
ボッテガ 長財布 軽井沢
万年筆 インク でない