Shia and Ahmadi hardliners need to focus on the takfiri Deobandi threat
Related post: تکفیریوں کی بستی میں ایک دن – از عامر حسینی
In the last few weeks, both Shia and Ahmadi hardliners have shown their limited vision and the utter lack of understanding their own plight. Some hardline Ahmadi activists are more focused on bashing Shias and concocting false history to support their arguments. Hardliner Shias continue to engage in non-violent takfir against Ahmadi Muslims. Both groups are heavily targeted in Pakistan.
Ahmadi Muslims face continuous attacks on their faith and have seen their rights being diminished by controversial and anti-human rights legislation by both elected governments and military dictators. Even their graves are not secure and are routinely attacked. The main groups targeting Ahmadis are the takfiri Deobandi ASWJ aka Sipah Sahaba aka LeJ. ASWJ has been responsible for two of the most recent massacres of Ahmadi muslims which include the Lahore mosque attacks in 2010 and the Mandi Bahauddin massacre in 2005. Ahmadi professionals and businessmen have also been targeted routinely in Lahore and Karachi.
Shia Muslims are the most heavily targeted faith group in Pakistan in what is increasingly being referred to as Shia Genocide. There are daily attacks on Shia professionals and youth and routine massacres – all leading back to the hate mongering takfiri Deobandi ASWJ.
At a time when Shia and Ahmadi activists are both striving to build bridges and develop a common platform, in walk the hardliners. Shia hardliners continue with the utterly senseless and anti-human rights Takfir of Ahmadi Muslims and taking their lead from an Iran that itself is shifting to a more moderate policy. It is a fact that not a single Mujtahid (senior Shia cleric) has ever issued a fatwa of takfir against Ahmadis. Currently a few hardliner Pakistani Shias are struggling to retrieve a fatwa of takfir from Iranian and Iraqi Shia clerics against Ahmadis but so far their requests have been declined by the Ayatollahs. Ahmadi hardliners continue to bait and undermine Shia activists. One Shia activist was busy defending the virulently anti-Shia Deobandi cleric and leading Taliban spokesperson, Mullah Aziz. On the other hand, an Ahmadi hardliner remained tacitly silent when anti-Ahmadi cleric, Tahir Ashrafi Deobandi was threatening LUBP for taking a stance against his (Ashrafi’s) anti-Ahmadi takfir. This Ahmadi hardliner, whose close collegues routinely promote takfiri Deobandi terrorists and hatemongers instead published an anti-Shia article whose main premise was a lie.
Both groups of hardliners place the bulk of their activism on bashing each other’s faith communities. Both rely on creating strawman arguments and concocting facts. Both groups inflate their arguments and discard facts as much as they can. Both groups engage in abuse and slander of LUBP instead of focusing on takfiri Deobandi ASWL/TTP. It is ASWJ who pose an existential threat to not just Ahmadi and Shias, but also to Sunni Barelwis, Christains, Sikhs and Hindus. Many of them shift their alliances on a regular basis – sometimes praising Imran Khan and then shifting their loyalties to Bilawal while making sure that their PML N and ASWJ ties remain secure too. Both groups of hardliners depend mostly upon clerics to make their case against each other.
LUBP welcomes the abuse and conspiracy theories of these two sets of hardliners as it tells us that we are doing something right. The abuse and slander is not just pathetic but provides moments of humour. Both groups represent the best of Ansar Abbasi, Hamid Mir and Orya Maqbool Jan in their intellectual dishonesty and the worst of their embattled communities.
Who was, and still is, behind the terrorist organization called Jundallah located in Baluchistan to create insurgency and destabilization for Iran?
Perhaps if one understood that, one might be able to forensically as well as perceptively understand who is behind these insurgents creating destabilizing terror in Pakistan.
Here is a compilation of reports for Jundallah from the Associated Press and the New York Times that I did a while back with my back analysis, i.e., reading back in time to understand the continuity of the reportage which often lends considerable more insight than a single news report, components as they often are of the Mighty Wurlitzer:
[1] IRAN, the Associated Press, and Covert-War of ‘Imperial Mobilization’
http://humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/04/ap-covertwar-imperial-mobilization.html
What does that analysis disclose, and suggest, to those able to think on the canvas of the Grand Chessboard?
Who is really behind these antediluvian insurgents wielding “militant Islam” and getting cozier with the Baluch “separatists” both besieging Pakistan:
[2] PAKISTAN, Insurgency vs. Counter-Insurgency By Zahir Ebrahim
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2010/10/insurgency-vs-counter-insurgency.html
[3] Imperial Surrogates and ‘Terror Central’ in Operation Gladio Redux
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2014/02/imperial-surrogates-operation-gladio.html
Thank you.
Zahir Ebrahim
Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
California
bakwas na kar
Reality of Ahmadi Phobia of Takfiri Shias including Sayyed Nakvisson, Jafar Tayyar Naqvi, Sabah Hasan, Huma Hasan and Azeem Sabazvari:
https://www.facebook.com/pakistanblogzine/posts/474885745945359
“اسلام میں شیعہ مسلک چوروں کی طرح پھیل گیا ہے اور ان لوگوں نے بہت انسانوں کو گمراہ کیا ہوا ہے_ تم شیعوں نے مشرکوں کی طرح حسین کی قبر کا طواف کیا_ حسین تمہیں نہ آزادی دے سکا نہ مدد کر سکا_ کئی دن تمھارے ناکام ہونے کے شاہد ہیں، خصوصا وہ دن جب علی کے بجاۓ ابوبکر، عمر اور عثمان خلیفہ بنے_ اور وہ دن جب تم نے حسین کے بھائی مسلم اور اس کی اولاد کو چھوڑ دیا اور وہ قید کر لیے گئے_ تم ڈر کے بھاگ گئے اور اہل بیت قتل کر دیے گئے_ تب حسین کی کمزوری ظاہر ہو گئی_ یہ تمہاری خام خیالی ہے کہ حسین سید الوریٰ ہے_ اے جنگلیوں کے ریوڑ تم پر ویل ہو، تمہیں یہ کہنے کی ہمت کیسے ہو گئی؟ تم نے قتل ہو چکنے والے حسین سے نجات چاہی ہے جو خود ناامید ہو کر مر گیا ہے_ پس تم لوگوں کو ہلاک کرنے والے خداۓ غیور نے ہمیشہ ناامید کیا_ میں خدا کا کشتہ ہوں اور تمہارا حسین دشمنوں کا کشتہ ہے پس مجھ میں اور حسین میں فرق واضح اور ظاہر ہے_ کاش تم یہ سب کرنے سے پہلے ہی مر جاتے اور دین تمہاری وجہ سے تباہ نہ ہوتا_ ہر مصیبت میں حسین حسین کرتے ہو گویا وہی تمہارا خدا ہے_ شیعہ مسلک اسلام پر ایک مصیبت ہے، گویا کستوری کی خوشبو کے پہلو میں پاخانے کا ڈھیر رکھا ہوا ہے”_
نام کتاب: اعجاز احمدیہ، ضمیمہ نزول مسیح، صفحہ 192 -194؛ مصنف: مرزا غلام احمد
Ali Murtaza’s comment:
Mirza Ghulam Ahmed, the founder of Ahmedi religion, called Shias “a heap of dung” and insulted Imam Hussain (as), one of the most revered personalities in Shia and Sunni Islam alike. How can anyone fail to condemn this hate spewing from Mirza Ghulam Ahmed? Criticism is one thing (and it should be encouraged) but abusing and name-calling is a different thing altogether. I hope some follower of Mirza Ghulam Ahmed can explain his statement.
Hi, how’s it going? Just shared this post with a colleague, we had a good laugh.
Louis Vuitton Borse http://www.hotelvillalauri.com/images/servizi/nklf.asp