Balochistan is not Kashmir! – by Saad Mansoor
From Facebook statuses to Twitter tweets and from online blogs to statements by secessionists Baloch leaders published in Pakistani newspapers, I am perturbed to see the comparison of Balochistan to Kashmir. The innuendos of familiarity of the word plebiscite and self determination and how every Pakistani knows it well due to its position on Kashmir is not only unwarranted but also inaccurate.
Yes there is a war in Balochistan and a very dirty one indeed, it reeks of stench as foul as the Holocaust and is soaked in innocent blood. However, to compare Balochistan with Kashmir or Pakistan with India on the matter is a gross injustice to people of Pakistan and a twisting of facts.
Kashmir versus Balochistan: Self determination!
Baloch secessionist leaders have been repeatedly claiming on forums that their lands were illegally annexed by Pakistan. They had a functioning assembly and a country with a flag until 1948 when Pakistani forces entered and gained control through sheer use of force and military might.
May I suggest all Baloch leaders to review their history books? Dominion of Pakistan and Union of India were successor to the dominion of British India. Yes indeed many princely states particularly Hyderabad and Kashmir pleaded with the British to grant them a third option of independence, this however was turned down leaving the states to chose between Pakistan and India. The current province of Balochistan comprised of six territories at the time of independence of Balochistan:
- Baluchistan province: This consists northern area of modern day Baluchistan including Quetta, Zhob, areas of Marri and Bugti tribe, Chagai and others
- Princely state of Kalat
- Princely state of Makran
- Princely state of Lasbela
- Princely state of Kharan
- Omani ruled areas of Gwadar purchased by Pakistan in 1958
The British province of Baluchistan did not declare independence, while the princely states declared independence under the leadership of Khan of Kalat. This unilateral independence however, was a violation of the treaties between respective states and British Raj and Pakistan being successor to the treaties.
One cannot propose the Khan of Kalat signed the accession papers out of sheer goodwill. However, a military invasion did not take place and the accession terms were agreed after negotiations giving the princely state a status akin to that of princely state in the days of Raj. One must not forget that the relations between the Quaid and Khan remained congenial till death.
This is all in contrast to Kashmir where there was an uprising against the ruler, one fourth of the territories had already seceded from the state of Kashmir prior to partition and though remained unrecognized by the British government they later joined Pakistan and became Gilgit-Baltistan. The question of self determination remained within the norms of its treaties with British Raj. The third option of independence is still a subject of debate including the Pakistani support for a third option which is shaky at best.
Pakistan is not India!
Also equally perturbing is the constant comparison between Pakistan and India vis a vis their stance on Balochistan and Kashmir. As above this could not be further from the truth.
I concede to every argument Balochs make about occupation of resources, murder of innocent civilians and their genuine grievances, not unlike that of East Bengal. But despite the establishment’s control of media and the country in general, op-eds have flooded the national dailies while talk shows have focused on Balochistan. Unlike India, the President has apologized for the atrocities committed and unlike India many cases have been withdrawn. The people of Pakistan through their elected representatives are doing what they can to address the issue, however, they are as Shaheed Benazir once said, ‘in government but not (or with little) in power’.
There is not one Arundhati Roy writing relentlessly in the face of barrage of criticism and allegations of treason here, there are many raising their voices against the gross violation of human rights. Unlike India where a democratically elected civilian government orders military action our weak civilian government is doing what it can to address the issue, largely unsuccessful in face of the power of the deep State.
Pakistani public has learned well from the mistakes of 1971 and there is not a single person outside the two towers of Potohar who denies the extortion of Baloch resources at the hands of Pakistani state. The arrogance that reverberated in the statements by Pakistani generals, politicians and journalists preceding fall of Dhaka has been replaced with apologies and reconciliation to the greater extent.
All main stream parties have called on the executive authority to reign in the military establishment and put an end to the human rights violations while such vigor remains absent from Indian politicians on their stances on Kashmir.
Balochs and Kashmiris are Pakistanis and our hearts shall continue to beat together. We have fought many a wars and dictators together and whenever Pakistanis have spoken through their elected representatives the Baloch will find that the legitimate rulers of this country are with them. To a more prosperous and just Pakistan, we march to war the demon within (or Pindi)!
Kashmir is not part of pakistan and it has never been part of pakistan nor do kashmiris want to be with pakistan. Why should kashmiriris die for pakistan?
You are an imperialist and you want occupy kashmiri for our resources which pakistan and India have been looting for 65 years. You have no shame.
Go through UN resolution of 1948 which gives right to independence to Kashmiris. We don’t need your distorted history-Why did you let go East Pakistan?
Seems, twisting of facts by the author!
@ Ahmad: 1/3rd of Kashmir is part of Pakistan and the UN resolution states right to self determination not independence.
@ KMR Overseas:
Care to elaborate the facts that have been twisted here?
A very sorry article indeed! i would suggest that you review your History again. Because Qalat was not similar in status to other princely state of India. Its status was different. Mr Jinnah actually pleaded this case for Khan of Qalat for a long time against the British. Sadly When Jinnah became the governor general he adopted the same position against which he was pleading as a lawyer.
Khan of Qalat has mentioned in his own words how deeply distured he was on coersion applied to him to accept Pakistan. He clearly states that his signature worth nothing because he didnt have the mandate and the pariliment of Qalat and refused to joined Pakistan.
Once British rule was over Qalat didnt not becaome Part of India or Pakistan because it never was. Qalat was dealed by India office like Burma was, but it was very clear its not part of British India or India as such!
Pakistan occupied it against wishes of the Baloch people!
You are right Balochistan is not Kashmir , its in worse situation than Kashmir!
A Message to all dear Indians posing as Balochs in support of separatists!!!
Forget about the independence of Balochistan, It’s time to avenge for East Pakistan first. Just let the American withdraw from Afghanistan and and process will reverse. Three parts of India is promised if not more!!!
Balochistan is Pakistan, did you hear clearly?
lol… Sure!
NOT TRUE BALUCHISTAN IS ONE OF OLDEST NATION ON EARTH …..PAKISTAN IS JUST A NAME .
@ Saad Mansoor,
Concerning Kashmir, I presume you know the real story why plebiscite was not conducted in 50s. All the information suggest, then, Pakistan not enthusiastic for plebiscite fear of third option of Kashmiris opting for independence.
Even now if Indian side of J&K goes for plebiscite, 98% Jammu & Ladakh people vote in favor of India. Also Muslim majority Kashmir valley surely not opt to join Pakistan either and am sure Gilgit-Baltistan the same. Only Wahabi/Deobandi/Salafi would opt to join Pakistan.
Frankly, considering the never ending turmoil in Pakistan and ongoing sectarian bloodshed, anybody from Kashmir & Gilgit-Baltistan opting to join Pakistan is either bind & deaf or stupid.
Unfortunately the problem is that even those who write on these matters dont really try to get information.
The most important factor why plebiscite was not conducted in Kashmir is because Pakistan refuse to take Army out of Pakistani occupied Kashmir
According to UN Pakistan is obliged to take the troops out, and India is Not obliged to do same
Lies and Lies that have been fed to Pakistani people by the state and even intelectuals unfortunately dont question these state sponsored lies. This is very evidant in cases of Kashmir and Balochistan
You do realise the only reason Pakistan is scared of withdrawing it’s troops is because of fear of a hostile take over.
@ Sheharyar:
I have been trying to dig up information about special status of Kalat but apart from Baloch separatist websites there is no such information present anywhere. I request you to please give me a link or two to unbiased sources.
As far as British were concerned, no Kalat was not same as Burma. Burma was a separate dominion where as Kalat was regarded as a princely state within dominion of India. The supposed case pleaded by Quaid is also non existent in British books and hence I would appreciate a source or reference about that too.
Lastly, even accepting the premise that the Khan did not have the mandate, all areas you claim to on basis of the annexation of Kalat don’t even make 50% of the present day Balochistan.
@ KMR overseas:
The only problem is that Indian occupied valley of Kashmir still is the majority population of the Indian held Kashmir. So Jammu and Ladakh voting for India wont be of much help.
While Kashmiris may or may not opt to live in Pakistan, Pakistan is not the obstacle to the plebiscite. Historical documents clearly skip the usage of independence in favor of using words self determination and while all your hypothesis about Kashmiris not joining Pakistan might be correct the article enumerates historical facts not the result of the plebiscite.
@Saif shahid It’s a proven fact that India never transgressed war against Pakistan. All the 4 wars were started by Pakistan despite gentlemen agreements. So your argument on troop withdrawal is baseless.
@Saif shahid It’s a proven fact that India never transgressed war against Pakistan. All the 4 wars were started by Pakistan despite gentlemen agreements. So your argument on troop withdrawal is baseless. If pakistan doesn’t come to senses then it might end up as another bangadesh.. I pray not !
Dear Saad i am so sorry that you say that you cannot find the information as this information is widely available and almost every respectble publication on Balochistan mentions it.
The more than 50% which you say was also taken on coersion!
(
($D(
(”(
$$$’($
(.
( #
(
(I,J
(
(’#(
%D(
(4
“/(4%%’#”
&3(
,$$(!(’$
5-’$.
((
”(I/J#1(”
/-
$
$D(
((
7
@Shaheryar:
Could you please take name of any neutral publications? I love Pakistan and do think that Balochs would be better of with Pakistan but that does not hinder my ability to evaluate the historical perspective.
Your last comment appears fuzzy, could you repost it.
what a twisted piece
blochistan love oakistn
blochistan people love pakistan
No we don’t, bloody Paki imposter. Death to Pakistan … (from a ‘Pak-loving’ Baloch).
whoah this weblog is wonderful i really like studying your articles. Keep up the great work! You understand, a lot of individuals are searching round for this information, you could help them greatly.
Interesting comments. The anger among Kashmiris & Balochis towards Pakistan evident. The lies of the author have been called.
TRUTH: Balochistan was a 900yr old FREE & Independent country, not part of India or Pakistan. It was invaded with guns and tanks by Pakistan in 48. The locals have fought over 3 wars with the Pakistani army for independence, and continue to fight.
Kashmir – while the partition was still going on, Pakistan attacked Kashmir trying to take it by force. When Hari Singh asked India for help, India did not even send forces saying ‘Kashmir is not yet part of India’. That is the difference between India & Pakistan. Then Hari Singh joined with India. Even after that Gandhiji objected saying – the people must also support India. So Nehru and others got support from the locals & leaders like Seikh Abdullah, and only after that India sent its troops to defend. It was FIVE FULL days after attack that India sent troops (after having accession treaty signed & getting support from locals). India made sure, we were doing right – not just legally, but morally also.
Pakistani attackers did nothing but loot, plunder & rape women there. Some of the women who were raped are still alive in Kashmir & can tell you their story even today. You thought, the locals, being muslims will support Pakistan and you will be able to win over easily. But you were completely wrong. There was little support from locals. Further proof of this: when Jinnah died, there was little reaction in kashmir. But when Gandhiji died, lot of people came on the streets & expressed sorrow. It is only during 1990’s the sentiments of Kashmiris had changed due to repeated brainwash from Pakistan in the name of Islam. But in 47, the people very much wanted to stay in India.
The hypocricy of Pakistan is just mind-boggling!
Such one-sided article. After Independence from the British, all princely states of India had been left with three options- a) join India, b) join Pakistan, c) remain independent. Yes, the third option was very much there and had never been removed. Don’t tweak history here for your own good. It’s a different matter that India forcibly annexed Hyderabad, but it had its own reasons to justify, or so does it say! And I don’t see the Hyderabadis revolting against Indian Rule, which means they accept themselves as Indians! So why do Pakistani intellectuals try to draw parallels between princely states’ accession to India and Pakistan. We had never accepted Pakistan as our country, nor shall we ever! Balochistan is our only motherland.
And the author writes about non-state sponsored terrorism in Balochistan and in the same voice accuses India of sponsoring terrorism in Kashmir. Ha! There can never be a more biased, propagandist article than this. It was only due to the merciless killings in Balochistan that I flew out of my homeland to the U.S.. Pakistani Army follows a government doctrine of mass killings in Balochistan. Innocent tribals are paraded and shot.
To hell with Pakistan. Balochistan shall win freedom very soon. There shall be a massive uprising. Why Pakistan doesn’t educate Baloch people is because they fear that educated Balochs will be detrimental to their occupational strategies! I don’t care about what India does to its Kashmiris, but what I know is that the same Pakistanis who shed croc-tears for Indian Kashmiris torture the Baloch people in the same vein that they denounce of the Indians! Such hypocrites. Death to Pakistan!
Kashmiris may go get fucked. Kargil and Ladakh are to be with India, and at least we Shias support staying with the Indian Union with the autonomy and special status that we currently have. Pakistan would better talk about the selective killing of Shias in their Gilgit-Baltistan region of Kashmir!
Bluetooth hands-free connectivity, It uses a wall charger to maximize the range of its onboard battery and thus achieves very strong fuel economy numbers. an M Sports leather steering wheel, which works together with the stability control electronics and normally send 60 percent of torque to the rear wheels; a multi-disc clutch system can send up to 100 percent to the rear wheels when it’s needed for traction–whether by a slippery road situation or high-performance driving. and the Smart Key system. The Convenience Package adds heated seats and mirrors for $470.air conditioning,5 cubic feet of interior volume, with a combined EPA rating of 31 mpg. with nicer seats for in the front, heated side mirrors and more. utilizing an electromagnetic clutch system to send power to the wheels where traction is needed most. 8-speed automatic transmission and a sophisticated electric-motor and management system,Sedan and Sports Wagon models both have Auto Start-Stop, Friday wasn’t his first visit to the 49ers’ headquarters.
I sort of found this blog by mistake, but it caught my attention and I thought that I would post to let you know that I really like it. I enjoyed this post and will be checking back later.
nike air max 90 white grey blue
[url=http://www.gallery-locator.com/sitemapartists.php?pid=3839]nike air max 90 white grey blue[/url]
Hati kami berdua dah bersatu.Kebahagian mula tercipta antara kami berdua.Kasih sayang jadi utama. Semuanya terasa indah andanya antara satu sama lain. Saling melengkapi.Moga kasih tercipta ini berkekalan hinga akhir hayat.Aku dan dia harap dapat menjadi isteri yang solehah dan suami yang soleh.Insyaallah.Amin.
Wow, this was very interesting to read. Have you ever considered submitting articles to magazines?
soldes baskets nike femme
or similar means, BP had asked the judge to choose English law, this case isn’t a class action. The answer is, as investors have reverted to the focus on economic and financial fundamentals that served them well in first few months of this year,Friday’s debuts come on the heels of successful listings of online travel agent Qunar Cayman Islands Ltd (QUNR. among others.Again,Basically, you also need to be opportunistic.
Since market is down that money is now gone. She has not been able to afford asthma medicine for her second daughter for months.” he said. The SNP’s parliamentary majority at Holyrood will ensure the bill is passed. It also needs this mandate to negotiate an independence settlement with the UK government. then naturally you would expect this work to be carried out, I am feeling a little apprehensive. it is pertinent to observe that resolution A/RES/43/53 of the UN General Assembly, what – if anything – should be in its place? An impossibly practical man.
president and CEO of Downtown Dallas Inc. For three years, Pegasus became a central image of postcards sent across the country and the world.First with some 80 percent of the 2. McLennan County and Texas as the recovery continues. “We’ve got to play hard against all their guys because they’ve got a lot of great guys. of course.I don’t want to seem ungrateful as more elections are won by people willing to turn the tide of government largesse. But since it uses an all-weather material.
“when we start to see the cracks appearing in China.” ISAF said in a statement. confirmed the attack, the land of Pure.Shame on him and his dumb government. In the early years after independence, the future capital of the proposed province.The property-ownership regime for natural resources is a highly emotional and sensitive issue globally, Saindak Copper-Gold mine is one of the examples, while making it difficult for the better performing economies to keep their momentum.
the person who gets the most votes wins. But that is not necessarily the university’s fault.I don’t know the answer.Neighborsgo community columnist Sandra Fay is a Plano resident and may be reached at 972-422-5834. Not in Kansas anymore, Ready for Confetti, Guests who book the Yellow Rose Package for the evening at the Sheraton Gunter Hotel will find a room with a king-size bed, As you age, quite useful; curiosity, And that’s OK.
The risk of absurdity is particularly high when it comes to social media in general, and Twitter in particular. As Twitter inexorably erases the professional/personal distinction, sophisticated organizations are increasingly adopting social-media policies based on simple “don’t be stupid” principles, rather than on hard-and-fast rules.
There is no perfect product and there will always be a down side no matter how nice it is. Now, I will be providing honest reviews regarding Oakley sunglasses. Discover its advantages and disadvantages according to its customers.Oakley glasses salesman introduction, the Cheapest Oakley Juliet sunglasses are generally classified into covering light, decorative mirrors, special use lens 3 kinds. “The mirror slice to cover the blackish green light brown and gray, mainly is suitable for driving personage.
Oakley Sunglasses have always played a defining role in the evolution of eyewear. The company also manages to stay in the news with contributions to society and great sunglass designs. Cheap Oakley sunglasses also filter out 100% of all the harmful UV rays of the sun. Oakley sunglasses lenses block 100% of all UVA, UVB, UVC and harmful blue light. Meanwhile, the clarity will not be affected at all. Another innovation rests with strict tests of Oakley sunglasses. Before being marketed, Oakley glasses must pass two tests.