trade off?

The US has linked sovereign immunity for ISI chief Ahmed Shuja Pasha in a lawsuit filed by relatives of victims of the Mumbai attacks in a Brooklyn court to the diplomatic immunity for an American arrested for the Lahore double murder, a media report said.

The US administration “appears willing to claim sovereign immunity for the ISI chief in this case provided Pakistan also granted diplomatic immunity to Mr (Raymond) Davis, who is a CIA contractor ,” Dawn newspaper quoted unnamed sources as saying.

“At one stage, the Americans were going to file papers in the court, stating that the ISI chief enjoyed sovereign immunity but decided not to do so after Mr Davis’ arrest,” an official source told the daily.

The court in Brooklyn has accepted the petition against the ISI chief for the agency’s alleged involvement in the Mumbai attacks, the report said. The arrest of another alleged CIA operative in Peshawar for over-staying his visa has further annoyed the Americans, who pointed out that more than 100,000 Pakistanis were living in the US after the expiry of their visas, it said.

The Americans seem willing to discuss Islamabad’s demand for sharing information on the CIA’s activities in Pakistan “provided the Pakistanis also shared relevant information ,” the source said.

Read more: Mumbai attack: US links cover for ISI chief to Davis case – The Times of India http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/Mumbai-attack-US-links-cover-for-ISI-chief-to-Davis-case/articleshow/7608088.cms#ixzz1Fcb2SC3n

Two jeems:

The Lahore High Court asked the counsel for the federation on Wednesday to get written comments from the chief of Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) on a petition seeking release of 11 men detained after their acquittal in terrorism cases.

Justice Saghir Ahmed Qadri of LHC`s Rawalpindi bench asked counsel Babar Ali to get the response of the military authorities concerned by March 17 on the petition filed by Attiqur Rehman and others through their lawyer Ilyas Siddiqi.

Relatives of the 11 men detained by military authorities after they were allegedly taken away from Adiyala jail on May 29 last year by personnel of intelligence agencies have sought their release, terming their detention illegal.

http://www.dawn.com/2011/03/03/comments-of-isi-chief-on-release-petition-sought.html

It will be illustrative if folks could post links to all terrorist attacks and incidents during General Paasha’s tenure as ISI head.

Jang Group says that Shahbaz Bhatti was murdered by US CIA:) then why didn’t the JUI (F) Stood in silent for Bhatti in National Assembly – Jang Group is paving the way to hide the Murderer Mullahs behind cock and bull story of CIA – Taliban say they did it but agencies also looking at Xe, RAW – By Shakeel Anjum Friday, March 04, 2011 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=4380&Cat=13&dt=3/4/2011

Could this Jang Group justify its campaign Aman Ki Asha with RAW’s parent country

Please finish the extension given to 180 Million Pakistanis.

I kept thinking why Bhatti was killed by some professional hit men, now I have the answer.
To believe that a few rogue asshiq e Rasool killed Bhatti just did not sit well with me. I think people who speculate on the Brooklyn court and the trade offs there, just don’t know what we are dealing with here. Brooklyn court is a petty matter and more or less a smokescreen.
Thanks for this piece of info.

http://www.dnaindia.com/world/report_a-spy-for-a-spy_1516052-all

A spy for a spy
Published: Sunday, Mar 6, 2011, 2:03 IST
By Amir Mir

With the CIA rapidly expanding its covert operations in Pakistan, and the ISI in no mood to surrender its dominant presence in the Af-Pak region, the arrest of CIA agent Raymond Davis has pushed the two intelligence agencies into an eyeball-to-eyeball confrontation.

The world of espionage and counter-espionage has rules of its own, with the most fundamental ones being: you don’t get caught, and you don’t get caught committing murders. These rules are even more critical if you happen to be an American spy working in Pakistan, a country seething with anti-American sentiment but headed by a pro-American government. Raymond Davis, the undercover CIA agent who faces a double murder charge in Pakistan for killing two youngsters in Lahore on January 27, broke both these rules. He is now in a Pakistani jail and the Americans are scrambling to get him out.

The US, however, has a tough job in saving him, for his arrest has acquired dimensions that the ex-Army Special Forces soldier (an elite group trained in weapons, foreign languages and cultures) may not have dreamt of when he whipped out his Glock and fired away at two young men on a motorbike. For what Davis’ arrest has achieved is to blow the lid off the scale and intensity of covert CIA operations on Pakistani soil — much of it without the knowledge or consent of the Pakistani intelligence establishment, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). This is also at the heart of the turf war between the CIA and the ISI.

How many Raymonds?
Indeed, Davis’ current predicament exemplifies this conflict. US President Barack Obama has tried both threats and persuasion to get Pakistan to release Davis who, they claim, is a member of the American diplomatic mission, and hence immune from criminal prosecution under the Vienna Convention. But Pakistan’s refusal to accede to the American demand of granting diplomatic immunity to a CIA agent has already led to a diplomatic row.

Although Raymond Davis says he had killed both the boys in self-defence as they tried to rob him, some media reports say the victims were ISI operatives who had been tracking him. An ISI official has issued a statement saying that Davis had contacts in the tribal regions along the Afghanistan border and already knew both the men he killed.

Even as the Raymond Davis fiasco raged, another Raymond was caught in Peshawar. This one hadn’t even cared to renew his expired Pakistani visa. Hence, ‘Raymond’ in Pakistan has come to characterise a typical, white, trigger-happy secret agent, with a revolver in his holster and a licence to kill in his pocket.

The arrests from Lahore and Peshawar point to the scale of the American spy network in Pakistan, prompting the masses to ask: how many Raymonds stalk Pakistan? Truth to tell, thousands of Raymonds live in posh localities of the four provincial capitals of Pakistan and the federal capital.

Profusion of security contractors
According to diplomatic sources in Islamabad, the number of American security contractors working for the US military and the CIA in the region has exceeded the total strength of the US troops and CIA personnel. Furthermore, the presence of over 80,000 US military and intelligence contractors in Afghanistan and Pakistan has taken the privatisation of the war to an unprecedented level.
There have also been credible reports that Blackwater Worldwide, the private security firm (now called Xe), has been working with US Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) on American Forward Operating Bases (FOBs) in various parts of Pakistan, including Karachi, on sensitive operations such as ‘snatch-and-grabs’ of high-value targets inside and outside Pakistan. As the American stakes became higher in Pakistan than in Afghanistan or Iraq, the strength of the US Mission in Islamabad also swelled from 280 to about 1,000, including CIA personnel, but without any agreement between the two governments.

The Davis issue comes in the wake of a major setback in Pak-US ties, when in November 2010, a US federal court issued a summons to the current head of the ISI, Lt Gen Ahmed Shuja Pasha as well as to a number of senior office-bearers of the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) for their involvement in the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks. The court is hearing a law suit filed by the relatives of Gavriel Noah Holtzberg, an American Jew, who was killed along with his wife in the 26/11 attacks. The petitioners had alleged that the ISI had a role in the attacks. This episode deeply upset the Pakistani military establishment, which has often been accused by the West of backing Islamic jehadi organisations active in India and Afghanistan.

ISI blows cover of CIA station chief
On December 16, 2010, almost a month after the November 19, 2010 issuance of the summons for the ISI chief and others, the Islamabad police moved to register a murder case against the CIA station chief in Pakistan, Jonathan Banks, who was supervising the US drone campaign. The complainant in the case was Kareem Khan, a resident of the Mirali area in North Waziristan, who claimed that his son and brother were innocent civilians killed in a US drone attack on December 31, 2009.

Banks was charged with providing operational guidance for the drone hit. This was the first time since 2004, when the US launched its drone campaign in Pakistani tribal areas, that a victim of a missile strike has sought legal action against the CIA.
The Obama administration subsequently decided to withdraw Jonathan Banks from Islamabad, citing security threats. But diplomatic circles in the federal capital were of the view that the case against the CIA station chief could not have been lodged without the consent of the Pakistani establishment.

Therefore, the filing of the case against Banks was largely seen as a tit for tat move, in a battle of one-upmanship between the ISI and the CIA. The American media subsequently alleged while quoting intelligence sources that the ISI was involved in blowing the cover of the CIA station chief, especially at a time when Washington was pushing Islamabad to support the CIA’s renewed efforts target al-Qaeda and Taliban militants on the Pak-Afghan border.

American intelligence sleuths stationed in Pakistan believe that these militant organisations, many of which are backed by the ISI, are linked to anti-US elements, especially the al-Qaeda and the Taliban, both of which are quite active on either side of the Pak-Afghan border despite a decade-long American crusade against them.

The decision-makers in Washington, therefore, want a bigger US presence in Pakistan in order to pursue their strategic interests in the region, especially when an exit strategy for Afghanistan is already being chalked out. That’s why the White House decided last year to spend approximately $1 billion from its $2.4 billion War Supplemental Package for Pakistan on the construction of its new embassy in Islamabad on 18 acres of land and additional staffing of the American mission.

Bargaining chip
As expected, however, the American reinforcement plans for Pakistan created ripples in Pak army circles due to apprehensions that more and more US military and intelligence personnel would be brought to Pakistan under the cover of diplomatic assignments for covert operations. The Obama administration wants a long-term presence in the region to protect its interests, and Islamabad is an ideal place for that purpose technologically, diplomatically and personnel-wise.

And just as the Americans were trying to allay the fears of the Pakistani establishment, Raymond Davis killed two youngsters in Lahore. But worse was to follow when the American media disclosed that the arrested US national — who was in the country on a diplomatic passport — was in fact part of a covert intelligence network involving hundreds of contract spies, operating in Pakistan without the knowledge of the ISI. Therefore, the Pakistani establishment is in no mood to free Raymond Davis as it apparently wants to use him as a bargaining chip to get the withdrawal of the civil lawsuit against the ISI chief.

According to recent US media reports, some senior US military officials have warned Pakistan that once beyond a tipping point, the Pak-US face-off could be taken over by political forces that cannot be controlled. Key American military officials, including Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Mike Mullen and International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) commander General David Petraeus, reportedly held a daylong meeting with the Pakistani Army chief, General Ashfaq Kayani, in Oman on February 22, to plot a course out of the diplomatic crisis. The Pakistani side reportedly made it clear that any step to resolve the crisis must include the withdrawal of the civil lawsuit against the ISI chief.

Although the case against the ISI chief is a civil lawsuit, Pakistan believes that if the US is serious about getting Davis released, the American president can quash it by invoking the provision of sovereign immunity Therefore, the possibility of a clandestine settlement between the two sides on both the cases — Raymond and Pasha — can’t be ruled out.

However, many in Pakistan fear that even after the current diplomatic crisis is resolved, it would be hard for the decision-makers in Washington and Islamabad to regain the lost buoyancy, primarily because their respective military and intelligence establishments are moving towards conflicting goals, with each trying to ensure that it becomes the dominant influence in Afghanistan after the war stops.

Nawaiwaqt / The Nation are very loyal:

General Pasha’s extension
By Ikramullah | Published: March 7, 2011
Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani deserves to be congratulated on taking a relevant and timely initiative of advising President Asif Zardari to extend the service of Lieutenant General Ahmed Shuja Pasha, Director General Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), for another two years. The General was due for retirement on March 18, 2010. But considering the messy and dangerous situation in South Asia, especially Pakistan, COAS General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani had extended his term for one year, which was within the ambit of the Army Chief’s powers.
The past year has witnessed a number of changes in the region. During his tenure, General Pasha has played an important role in handling many regional issues in the best interest of Pakistan. Truly, it is not easy to accomplish difficult tasks specifically without compromising the country’s integrity and sovereignty.
Once again, with the General’s term due to expire on March 18, 2011, the multi-dimensional threats facing the state, and the challenges of America’s AfPak strategy, have placed it at the crossroads where continuation of the highly sensitive intelligence coordination (between ISI and CIA) is vital for a successful outcome. Thus, Gilani’s recommendation to Zardari for a two-year extension for Pasha reflects a remarkable unanimity of views between the country’s civil and military leadership.
Also, it brings out a complete unity of approach with regard to the implementation of the strategy on national security under the present leadership. In this context, the period between 2011 and 2013 is marked by many crucial events, which may change the course of South Asia significantly. For instance, the term of the present government is due to expire in 2013, while the Army Chief’s tenure expires at almost the same time. Likewise, the security situation in FATA and the Pak-Afghan border coupled with the planned withdrawal of the US and NATO forces from Afghanistan falls within the same timeframe.

http://nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Opinions/Columns/07-Mar-2011/General-Pashas-extension

PML-N opposes ISI chief extension

SLAMABAD: The PML-N on Tuesday opposed the extension given by the government to in-service Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) chief Major General Shuja Pasha.
In an interview to Express News programme Pakistan Bolta Hai with Munizae Jahangir, PML-N leader Chaudhry Nisar said the ISI chief is already on an extension, and the PML-N was not consulted on a second extension.
Lieutenant General Pasha, director general of the military’s ISI agency, is due to retire this month but will remain in office, perhaps for two more years, theDawn newspaper reported.
Pasha, a former head of military operations for the army, was appointed head of the ISI in September 2008, at a time when US officials questioned the reliability of the spy agency in the campaign against militancy.
Discussing the issue of the NAB chairman case, Nisar said that his party would wait for the detailed decision of the Supreme Court on the case before replying to the letter written to him by President Asif Ali Zardari. However, he added that there were several questions that he also wanted to ask President Zardari on the issue.
Earlier, Prime Minister Syed Yousaf Raza Gilani’s spokesman had refuted Nisar’s claim of not receiving a letter sent by the President about the NAB chief.
The spokesman claims the letter was received by Chaudhry Nisar’s guard at the opposition leader’s residence in Rawalpindi on March 11. The letter was written in connection with consultation on the appointment of NAB chairman after the Supreme Court ruled Deedar Hussain Shah’s appointment illegal.
Referring to the PML-N’s role in the current setup, Nisar said his party would not adopt any unconstitutional or un-parliamentary path but the PML-N was in a position to give the government a tough time.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/133016/pml-n-opposes-isi-chief-extension/