Questions Mona Kazim Shah should ask of False Sunni Shia binary peddler and White Helmet Jibran Nasir?
Editor’s note: These questions were raised by sincere supporters of Shaheed Khurrum Zaki and should not be taken lightly.
1. We’ve heard that you ditched Khurram Zaki in the time of need, tried to insult him and even pressured him through an ISI brigadier not to protest outside Red Mosque. You even said that we will protest only when LEAs allow us; were you working on the dictations of ISI?
2. Now that you’ve become popular, you have forgotten Molvi Abdul Aziz; you used it to pimp yourself and then left Khurram to fight, he died fighting and you kept selling the blood of martyrs and forget that you started the campaign against Abdul Aziz and he’s still sitting there in the mosque. On whose instructions did you end the campaign against him?
3. Why do you try to somehow present the Deobandi terrorism in Pakistan as some reciprocal violence against two or more sects? Why do you present the issue with false neutrality and not call out perpetrators who are responsible for 99% of violence by their Deobandi identity?
4. Why did you perpetuate the lie that notorious Deobandi hate cleric, cleric Mazhar Ali Azhar – known for his Anti -Ahmadi and Anti-Shia views was a Shia. Your lie made no sense but you still used it at the La Takfir conference to rub it in the face of the Shia community facing genocidal violence. You repeated the canard that Mazhar Ali Azhar, who called the Shia Muslim Founder of Pakistan, Jinnah, a Kafir was also a Shia! besides being a lie, this made no sense either!
5. On Malik Ishaq’s death, rather than condemning a corrupt, Pro Taliban judiciary, you chastised Shias for showing relief. You were actually a part of the compromised movement to restore these corrupt, pro Takfiri Judges who overturned standing convictions against Malik Ishaq even as he boasted of his intent to kill more Muslims.
Recently article of Ali Abbas Taj, Editor of popular secular, human rights based blog LUBP appeared on LUBPAK.com titled with “Questions Mona Kazim Shah should ask of False Sunni Shia binary peddler and White Helmet Jibran Nasir? “
White Helmet may be new and unknown term for my some readers so I want to throw some light on this term.
An article posted on http://www.globalresearch.ca : ‘White Helmets’: New Breed of Mercenaries and Propagandists, Disguised as ‘Humanitarians’ in Syria. This article starts with this sentence,
“White Helmets is the newly minted name for ‘Syrian Civil Defence.’ Despite the name, Syria Civil Defence was not created by Syrians nor does it serve Syria. Rather it was created by the UK and USA in 2013. Civilians from rebel controlled territory were paid to go to Turkey to receive some training in rescue operations. The program was managed by James Le Mesurier, a former British soldier and private contractor whose company is based in Dubai.”
So in my though Jibran Nasir type so called activists are ‘New Breed of Mercenaries and Propagandists deputed by military establishment , disguised as ‘Emancipators’ of Shiite community of Pakistan, which is major victim of Takfiree Deobandi terrorism.
Khurram Zaki a Shiite intellectual activist , Co-editor of blog LUBP and admin of various social pages on social media against exclusionist ideology of Wahhabism and Deobandism (who was targeted to death by Deobandi Takfiree terrorists on 7th May,2016 in Karachi) started a campaign against Takfiree Deobandi organization Ahle Sunnat Wal Jammat –ASWJ (which was banned just in papers and fully active all over the country) and Red Mosque Brigade including most Takfiree and big supporter of ISIS, Al-Qaeda , Lashkar Jhangvi. Main purpose of this social campaign on one side to spread awareness in public against such exclusionist elements and on other side to increase pressure on civil and military leadership to arrest all active exclusionist and takfiree fascists elements and to implement a real ban on Takfiree Deobandi banned organization working against not only Shiite community but against Sufi Sunnis, Christians, Ahmadis, Hindus and others.
Khurram Zaki was among those intellectuals who not only were ideologically refuting false binaries like Shiite-Sunni or Iran-Saudi for understanding Takfiriee Phenomenon and its offshoots bloody terrorists who were targeting every those person who did not agree with their Takfiree Ideology but active practically against all sympathizers, facilitators, obfuscators and apologists of Takfiree Deobandi terrorism. He really did excellent job to come together all victims of Takfiree terrorism particularly he worked for solidarity between people belonging to mai mainstream Shiite Islam and mainstream Sunni Islam( both are majority communities of Muslim Population in Pakistan).
As I knew him, view of Khurram was that divide in masses on question of terrorism and its roots was not only due to those writers, scholars, intellectuals and so called analysts who were openly on side of terrorists and acting as ideologues for them but mainly this divide was due to those obfuscators who not only obfuscated identity of terrorists but use Saudi Arab Vs Iran or Shiite Vs Sunnis framework to explain target killings , suicide bombings and Takfiree campaign against Shiite, Sufi Sunnis in Pakistan.Such obfuscators disguised themselves either as Human rights activists, progressive, liberal , Marxist analysts or social activists.Khurram Zaki devised term ‘Comercial liberal mafia ‘ or Sufayani liberals for such obfuscators and called them apologists for Deobandi Takfiree terrorism in Pakistan.Khurram Zaki’s efforts and intellectual struggle were getting popularity much among Shiite youth of Pakistan and following of him increasing more and more.His campaign not only attracted Shiite community but many others having Sunni Muslims , Ahmadis , Christian , Hindu background.
Khurram first gave a sit-in in Karachi against ASWJ and where he and his comrades forced to Sindh Government to make an agreement to take steps against organized hate campaign of ASWJ against Shiite and other religious communities. In that sit-in we first time saw Jibran Nasir and then Khurram started campaign against cleric of Red Mosque after his video released in which he denied to condemn attack on APS Peshawar KPK and he showed his bigoted and Takfiree ideas against Shiite community.Jibran Nasir tried to capture this whole movement and When Khurram started to expose double standards of military establishment along with civilian leadership then Jibran Nasir Exposed bitterly.
Ali Abbas Taj (who was very close comrade of Khurram Zaki) alleged that Jibran Nasir ditched Khurram Zaki in the time of need, tried to insult him and even pressurized him through an ISI brigadier not to protest outside Red Mosque. You even said that we will protest only when LEAs allow us; were you working on the dictations of ISI.
Jibran Nasir tried to pose himself as expert of Muslim history and he perpetuated the lie that notorious Deobandi hate cleric, cleric Mazhar Ali Azhar – known for his Anti -Ahmadi and Anti-Shia views was a Shia. His lie made no sense but he still used it at the La Takfir conference to rub it in the face of the Shia community facing genocidal violence. He repeated the canard that Mazhar Ali Azhar, who called the Shia Muslim Founder of Pakistan, Jinnah, and a Kafir was also a Shia! Besides being a lie, this made no sense. He was misguided young minds through such lies. Aim was to prove his false binary seeking approach.
On Malik Ishaq’s death, rather than condemning a corrupt, Pro-Taliban judiciary, he chastised Shias for showing relief. He was actually a part of the compromised movement to restore these corrupt, pro Takfirist Judges who overturned standing convictions against Malik Ishaq even as he boasted of his intent to kill more Muslims. This type of statements in fact shows his false non-partisan mentality or neutrality and price for such false neutrality was obfuscation of identity of terrorists and such approach created justification of Shiite killing by Takfirist Deobandi.
Jibran Nasir is not only himself clear on Question of religious Fascism and its roots but he misguides people on this question. He various times presents the Deobandi terrorism in Pakistan as some reciprocal violence against two or more sects? He even does not tell his audience difference between mainstream Sunni Islam and Wahhabi-Radical Deobandi ideology-An ideology very close to exclusionist ideology.
I talked to him through mobile phone and asked him Why had he presented the issue with false neutrality and not called out ever perpetrators who were responsible for 99% of violence by their Deobandi identity? He did not reply.
He is now in United States of America and he is going to deliver a speech in Galaxy Hall, University of Texas of Dallas on 25th September,2016.Topic is ‘ Pakistan , Current Affais , Minorities and Terrorism ‘.
I think Ali Abbas Taj has raised valid questions in time and Mona Kazim Shah should put them in front of Jibran Nasir who has become popular but forgotten Molvi Abdul Aziz; and Ali Abbas Taj correctly pointed out that Jibran used it to pimp himself and then left Khurram to fight.Khurram Zaki had targeted to death while fighting and Jibran kept selling the blood of martyrs and forget campaign against Abdul Aziz and he’s still sitting there in the mosque.
On whose instructions did you end the campaign against him? That is very important question raised by Ali Abbas Taj, should be asked by Mona Kazim Shah of Sunni Shia binary peddler and White Helmet Jibran Nasir.But I am little hope.
https://jagarti.wordpress.com/2016/09/25/jibran-nasir-in-u-s-a-new-breed-of-military-establishmentwhite-helmet-propagandistdisguised-as-emancipator-of-victims-of-terrorism/
There are barely any organisations that are completely monolithic. Lobbies, groups, hierarchies and layers exist in all organisations. And like any other organisation, there are such lobbies within Pakistan’s ISI as well.
Within ISI there are small and weak lobbies that now consider the Deobandi network and their iconic figures such as Molvi Abdul Aziz of Red Mosque as threats to Pakistan and want to do away with them but they cannot go ahead with their plans due to powerful lobbies within ISI that still support and use the Deobandi network, or have been ideologically infested with the ideology.
Jibran Nasir was also an experiment by one of those weak lobbies within ISI that couldn’t do much itself due to internal pressure and therefore tried to use a fledgling and opportunistic activist as a face that could create public opinion against Molvi Abdul Aziz, an icon of the Deobandi network in Pakistan.
When Jibran was tasked with this duty and started working on it, several other people including sincere, brave and dedicated people like Shaheed Khurram Zaki also joined what they thought was a genuine movement. Since they were oblivious of fact that Jibran has been tasked with it, they worked hard with passion and vigour and ultimately there reached a point where Khurram Zaki became the face of what became a real movement.
Jibran’s ego was hurt and he also failed to deliver on the task he had been assigned. At the same time, the lobby within ISI that had tasked Jibran with the assignment started to feel the heat from within the organisation and therefore had to call off the operation. Jibran tried his best to force Khurram Zaki to stop the protests but since the latter was honest and dedicated, and wasn’t taking any dictations, he relentlessly went ahead against the Red Mosque, Molvi Abdul Aziz and the Deobandi terror network.
Jibran Nasir publicly insulted Khurram Zaki, put up Facebook posts against him, and even tried to pressurise him through ISI directly, but Khurram didn’t stop. He was adamant to fight the Takfiri Deobandi terror network and root it out of Pakistan, or die doing it.
By this time, the chic Jibran Nasir had developed enough contacts to move on to greener pastures, sell himself to international donor agencies like the Soros Foundation and travel the world. Khurram on the other hand was fighting alone on the streets and in the courts against Molvi Abdul Aziz, ASWJ/LeJ and Aurangzeb Farooqi. But he was left in the lurch.
Khurram Zaki was eventually killed by the Takfiri Deobandi terrorists because he was all on his own except his few friends. No intelligence agency was handling or protecting him and no donor agency was paying him. He left this world in a very honorable but a very heart-rendering way. He was shot at a small roadside tea shack while Jibran was probably sipping coffee at an upscale cafe discussing an upcoming cosmetic event at a five star hotel paid for by an international donor.
Jibran Nasir after having insulted and left Khurram Zaki alone, shamelessly returned to hijack his funeral and then sell his blood. Khurram Zaki was truly mazloom. And Jibran Nasir continues to sell Khurram blood and the blood of thousands of other martyrs.
https://lubpak.com/archives/350854
So to clarify a few allegations mentioned above.
1. The only cases still pending against Abdul Aziz are by Jibran. Total of three cases. Two in lower court and one in high court. Date of hearing 28th Sept.
2. ISI agents dont reveal their connections. When khurram announced protest in Dec 2015 outside lal masjid and note he wasnt their in dec 2014, the Islamabad administration called Jibran as they thought he is also protesting. Three people called him. Asst. Commissioner Islamabad, SP City Islamabad and Director ISI Islamabad and Jibran himself revealed this on his facebook page only saying that the city administration on security grounds had asked khurram not to protest there. The reason Jibran didnt attend the protest is because since the registration of FIR against Aziz jibran hasnt once protested outside lal masjid and shifted protest to outside the Aabpara Police Station as he believes the ball is in Govt’s court now.
3. It was Jibran who collected and drafted the evidence file against Aziz in January 2015 and sent it to all MNAs and Senators and got Nisar cornered in the Parliament after which Aziz was forced to come and take bail in his cases.
4. As regards Mazhar Ali Azhar please stop referring to something as frivilous as Wikipedia and read the report of Supreme Court of Pakistan by Justice Munir and Justice Kiyani specfically Pg. 254 and 255 where it is noted that Mazhar Ali Azhar was a shia and jibran mentioned that just like Taliban and ISIS claim to follow sunnis similarly not every Shia is a representatives of the Imam. People are individually evil or corrupt as well.
5. As regards Malik Ishaq, Jibran’s blog on his death is available on Pak Tea House. He primarily criticized the Pakistan Govt and Judiciary for failing to him a sentence and then being forced to kill him through encounter as this is not a sustainable solutions to the problem of terrorism in Pakistan and Jibran believes in strengthening institutions.
6. As regards Khurram Zaki jibran has always publicly admitted to have differences with him but has never made accusations on any public forum about the intentions of any activists even though ppl continue to question his intention and damage his integrity.
7. Also why dont the close friends of Khurram Zaki reveal that didnt Jibran leave his own Mamos funeral in lahore and came to Karachi to help register fir for khurrams murder and wasnt jibran forced to address the people at Khurrams funeral to calm ppl down as they were getting rowdy. Wasnt it Khurrams close friends and his brother who asked Jibran to speak at the Funeral.
Let’s try to encourage all those that are tying to make a positive difference and rise beyond personal likes and dislikes