US and UK should ban Deobandi and Salafi mosques to stop execution of innocent Western citizens by ISIS terrorists
The executions of Western journalists and aid workers continues unabated. Violence against Sufi and orthodox Sunni Shia, Christian and minorities is attributed to a the Deobandi/Salafi ideology. This is not to say that there is something wrong with a child born into a Salafi or Deobandi household. In fact vast majority of the Salafis and Deobandis are peaceful. At the same time we have to call a spade a spade, not only almost all terrorism is Deobandi or Salafi related, appeal to non Muslim converts is also evident. There will always be a small minority of people that this Khawariji Takfirism effects but they almost always be Deoabandi, Salafi or Saudi related.
It is an ideology of Salafi Deoabandi Takfirism that is creating this violence, billions of dollars of funding by Saudi Arabia to Western mosques has converted a majority of Sunni Muslims to Wahhabism and Takfirism in the West.
Henning, 47, a taxi driver from Salford, a town near Manchester, was seized while taking part in an aid convoy near Syria’s border with Turkey. Islamic State militants threatened to kill Henning in a video that showed the killing of another Briton, aid worker David Haines.
The Islamic State, also known as ISIS, emerged from obscurity this year to capture vast swaths of territory in Syria and Iraq, countries plagued by instability and war. Espousing a severe interpretation of Sunni Islam, the extremists have beheaded two American journalists, James Foley and Steven Sotloff, in apparent retaliation for U.S.-led airstrikes in the region. Islamic State militants have also threatened to kill an Iraqi journalist who refused to cooperate with the organization.
http://www.ibtimes.com/isis-wife-british-taxi-driver-captured-islamic-state-militants-pleads-his-release-1692473
The video released on Friday is yet to be verified, but it appears to show Mr Henning kneeling beside a militant, who is dressed in black, in a desert setting.
The footage ends with an IS fighter threatening a man they identify as Mr Kassig.
In a statement, Mr Kassig’s family said he had converted to Islam and referred to him as Abdul Rahman Kassig.
CAMBRIDGE, England — IN the last few years, there has been a dramatic rise of a seemingly new type of polity: the Islamic rebel state. Boko Haram in West Africa, the Shabab in East Africa, the Islamic Emirate in the Caucasus and, of course, the Islamic State in the Middle East, known as ISIS, or ISIL — these movements not only call for holy war against the West, but also use their resources to build theocracies.
Though in some respects unprecedented, these groups also have much in common with the Islamic revivalist movements of the 18th century, such as the Wahhabis on the Arabian Peninsula and the great jihadist states of the 19th century. They waged jihad against non-Muslim powers, and at the same time sought to radically transform their own societies.
One of the first groups to engage in anticolonial jihad and state-building was the fighters led by Abd al-Qadir, who challenged the French imperial invasion of North Africa in the 1830s and 1840s. Qadir declared himself “commander of the faithful” — the title of a caliph — and founded an Islamic state in western Algeria, with a capital in Mascara, a regular army and an administration that enforced Shariah law and provided some public services. The state was never stable, nor did it ever encompass a clearly defined territory; it was eventually destroyed by the French.
Equally short lived was the Mahdist state in Sudan, lasting from the early 1880s to the late 1890s. Led by the self-proclaimed Mahdi (“redeemer”) Muhammad Ahmad, the movement called for jihad against their Egyptian-Ottoman rulers and their British overlords, and it established state structures, including a telegraph network, weapon factories and a propaganda apparatus. The rebels banned smoking, alcohol and dancing and persecuted religious minorities.
The key decisions that enabled al-Qa‘ida to survive, and later to expand, were made in the hours immediately after 9/11. Almost every significant element in the project to crash planes into the Twin Towers and other iconic American buildings led back to Saudi Arabia. Bin Laden was a member of the Saudi elite, and his father had been a close associate of the Saudi monarch. Citing a CIA report from 2002, the official 9/11 report says that al-Qa‘ida relied for its financing on “a variety of donors and fundraisers, primarily in the Gulf countries and particularly in Saudi Arabia.” The report’s investigators repeatedly found their access limited or denied when seeking information in Saudi Arabia. Yet President George W. Bush apparently never even considered holding the Saudis responsible for what happened. An exit of senior Saudis, including bin Laden relatives, from the US was facilitated by the US government in the days after 9/11. Most significant, twenty-eight pages of the 9/11 Commission Report about the relationship between the attackers and Saudi Arabia were cut and never published, despite a promise by President Obama to do so, on the grounds of national security.
In 2009, eight years after 9/11, a cable from the US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, revealed by WikiLeaks, complained that donors in Saudi Arabia constituted the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups world- wide. But despite this private admission, the US and Western Europeans continued to remain indifferent to Saudi preachers whose message, spread to millions by satellite TV, YouTube, and Twitter, called for the killing of the Shia as heretics. These calls came as al-Qa‘ida bombs were slaughtering
people in Shia neighborhoods in Iraq. A sub-headline in another State Department cable in the same year reads: “Saudi Arabia: Anti-Shi’ism As Foreign Policy?” Now, five years later, Saudi-supported groups have a record of extreme sectarianism against non-Sunni Muslims.
بھائی اسی طرح سے کام چلتا آ رہا ہے. پہلے بھی تو خلافتیں قائم ہوتی تھیں اسلام کے نام پر
پھر قتل عام مچایا جاتا تھا . مخالفین کے سر کاٹے جاتے تھے . باقیوں کو ڈرایا جاتا تھا
بعد میں زخمیوں میں تبلیغ کے لیے مکّار قسم کے چالاک مفتی اور مولوی تبلیغ کرتے تھے
خلیفہ کی سپاہ اور عدالتیں بعد کا کام سنبھال لیتی تھیں . نام اسلام کا ہی استعمال ہوتا تھا
زیادہ تر اسلام اسی طرح پھیلا ہے بھائی. برا لگے یا بھلا. سچ ہے یہی چاہے کڑوا صحیح.
نام اسلام اور صحابہ کا ہی استعمال ہوتا تھا تو کوئی اعتراض ہی نہیں کرسکتا تھا
بڑا مشکل وقت گزارا اسلام نے اور بڑا نہ جائز استعمال کیا اسلام کےجھنڈے کا خلیفاؤں اور حکمرانوں نے
is this response to…..
http://m.aljazeera.com/story/201331883513244683
read this as well plz!