LUBP Exclusive: A critical interview with Nadeem F. Paracha
Nadeem F. Paracha is a cultural critic and senior columnist for Dawn Newspaper and Dawn.com. Here is his exclusive interview for LUBP, which is being published as the first interview in the LUBP Critical Interview Series.
LUBP: Nadeem, thanks for taking out the time to interview with us. Tell us about your background in politics and your experience as a student activist of PSF. How did Zia’s ban on Student unions in colleges and universities affect political activism in Pakistan? Also, and these are really 3 interconnected questions, what was it like to live during the Zia years and not getting drunk on the cool aid of false nationalism that infected so many educated youth of this generation?
NFP: Well, let’s begin with my association with PSF. I joined PSF during my first year in collage (Saint Patrick’s Govt. College, Karachi), in 1984 simply because PSF was associated with a party (the PPP) which in those days was facing some of the most extreme forms of repression orchestrated by the Ziaul Haq dictatorship. In those days, whereas most universities and colleges in Karachi and Lahore had been taken over by brute force by the Islami Jamiat Taleba (IJT), somehow St. Pat’s College hardly had any IJT members. There was just PSF, Baloch Students Organization (BSO), and some small National Students Federation (NSF) factions, and by 1985 I helped get all these progressive student parties together and formed a united front which went by the name of Saint Patrick’s Socialist Students Front (SSPF).
Our main aim was to keep IJT out of the college – by force, if and when required. We also held demonstrations against the Zia regime and against certain teachers we thought were fraudulent.
Zia’s ban on student unions was simply conceived to mute the student parties that were vigorously opposing his dictatorship. But what broke the camel’s back in this respect was the widespread defeats the IJT suffered in the 1983 student union elections across Pakistan. After the ban however, only the IJT was allowed to operate freely, while other student groups were constantly harassed.
As for what it was like not getting tipsy on Zia’s brand of patriotism and religion, well, you might be surprised to learn that a lot of young people really never took that crap seriously. Much of the student groups or youth on the left were openly against the ISI and CIA’s war against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, whereas young people on the right were too busy reaping the material benefits of the humongous amounts of financial aid that was coming in from the US and Saudi Arabia.
What I am suggesting is that all the ideological and cultural engineering that went on during the Zia regime, its affects actually began impacting young generations after his death.
Young people on the left vehemently opposed the dictatorship using not only politics, but also the arts like poetry, painting, theatre and folk music. Most of us were focused on just replacing a dictatorship with a democratically elected government. Those on the right, though intolerant as ever, weren’t all that fascistic or psychotic as they have now become.
What I am saying is that the impact of the mess that Zia was creating in the name of Islam and Pakistan really began being felt on the lives of generations that arrived after his death. It was in the 1990s that we first began to notice exactly how much political, cultural and moral damage that man had inflicted.
Today, he may be dead and buried in Islamabad, but his legacy is alive and kicking in our politics, sociology and media. He had given a section of the population – who were once considered to be a right-wing lunatic fringe – the power to impose its warped ideas about patriotism, faith and politics over a population which was not so messed up about its religion and identity as it is now.
Thanks to Zia’s policies, this lunatic fringe has now become the mainstream in Pakistan.
LUBP: Your writings on rock music gave you a cult following among those who wanted a lucid appraisal of the local rock music scene. What is the scene like these days. Are there any groups that are producing good music?
NFP: Yes, I did write a lot on the local pop and rock scene back in the 1990s, idealistically believing that in trying to politicize certain corners of the music scene, one might generate an alternative young urban middle-class consciousness in the new generation – the sort certain musicians managed to arouse in the west in the 1960s (Woodstock), or late 1970s (Punk rock).
In my naiveté, and perhaps also arrogance, I thought this consciousness while being imparted by certain pop and rock bands may make the new generation of young middle class urbanites question the hollow and hypocritical brand of religion, morality and nationalism that was peddled by the Zia dictatorship in the 1980s.
In my enthusiasm I forgot that the end of the Cold War is going to unleash a new era requiring a whole new way of thinking.
I feel silly now about the way I ridiculed certain commercial pop acts for being non-political, because the new truth in this context was that from now on, even the most apolitical act of modern art and action, no matter how commercial or lacking an ideology, would work as a bulwark against a society that was fast converting itself into an insecure, intolerant and introverted set of people.
Lately, I am very impressed with the way things like Coke Studio have managed to give a new and much needed dimension to folk and Sufi music as well as to pop music itself. To me these days even blatantly corporate things like Coke Studio have become vital tools of reflection for a society that is at war with itself over the question of what constitutes true faith and what it really means to be a Pakistani.
Pakistanis facing these questions must realize that even in a highly reactive environment today, most young Pakistanis are bound to relate more to a young pop star singing a Sufi kalam or a quawalli, than he or she can with a mad man who in the name of faith either spouts utter hatred and xenophobic rants on mainstream television, or worse, decides to blow himself up in the name of God in the presence of innocent women, children and men.
As to what the music scene is like today, I have no clue … but I do know that Ali Azmat is finally suffering the affects of a thoroughly fried brain!
LUBP: There is always an interplay between rock music and the prevailing political ethos. How do you think today’s rock musicians in Pakistan relate to the prevailing situation, specifically an extremist ideology that has no toleration for music, culture or liberal dissent?
NFP: I got deluded by the scene as well as with my own work in this context not only due to the fact that I was engaging with the scene on a rather naïve and overtly ideological level, but also due to what I saw was happening to a lot of musicians.
From the mid 1990s, democracy seemed or behaved in a rather meek fashion in its pursuit to address certain ogre like social, political, religious and cultural problems that the Zia regime had left behind.
For example, late Benazir Bhutto, who was such a hero and icon of my generation, just didn’t seem to move even an inch to remove the psychological bottle necks that the society had found itself stuck in after Zia’s departure. So many discriminatory laws and policies devised by Zia against women, the minorities, artistes and those with a liberal bent of mind remained intact.
The feeling was that if these laws remained untouched even during the governments of a liberal-left party, then they might be right. But then one can also point out that by then the right-wing press, the reactionary lobbies and the intelligence agencies had gained so much strength, that it became almost impossible for BB to even lift a finger against anything deemed ‘Islamic.’
And of course, one expected nothing from the likes of Mian Nawaz Sharif and PML-N in this respect. His party’s whole existence seemed to revolve around how to completely eliminate the PPP, or more specifically, BB.
So as our democrats went to war with one another, and the end of the Cold War suddenly rendered the left inconsequential and in utter chaos, the new generation either fell lock, stock and barrel for the growing role of large multinational corporations and consumerism, or, on the other end, many plunged into any number of myopic and compartmentalized versions of faith that emerged from the fringes and onto the surface.
A large number of urban middle-class young men and women fell pray to all this so-called spiritual and theological hoopla floating around at the time. Things like the Tableeghi Jammat, Farhat Hashmi and many other evangelistic groups began penetrating and making inroads into the middle-classes, also gunning for pop stars and famous cricketers.
And what these evangelists went for was a mental disposition that was extremely venerable to a selective kind of religious questioning that attempted to expose many Pakistanis’ lack of knowledge about the more puritanical aspects of Islam.
It is very easy actually to intellectually retaliate and neutralize the evangelists’ hyperbolic brand of faith and ritualism, but most young Pakistanis found themselves lacking this ability. Thus, unable to question what was being peddled to them as true faith, they ended up feeling guilty, or rather, they were consciously made to feel guilty.
This is also the time when things like the burqua, the hijab and long beards started to make their way into the fashion and spiritual aesthetics of the middle-classes.
It was quite a sight watching some free-wheeling pop stars suddenly becoming preachers, with some of them even deciding to quit music. What was once a debate – such as was music allowed in Islam – that was restricted to the most conservative sections of society, became a debate among the so-called hip liberals.
Can you believe that? How can musicians who truly understand the beauty and power of music, were now debating whether to quit something beautiful and replace it with something that was akin to a mullah’s danda!
It has been all downhill from there. The trend has further deteriorated where its now not only about some musicians becoming evangelists, wearing their faith on their sleeves, but some, who, though, did not become pop molvies, they have however, allowed themselves to be sucked in by the heightened post-9/11 conspiratorial and paranoid environment, senselessly mouthing utter nonsense about how our pious, innocent country is being infiltrated and destroyed by the Zionists, the west and, of course, the Hindus.
The funny thing is, that such musicians, or for that matter, actors and all, behave as if they are completely oblivious to the contradiction that they are living. Their rhetoric is derived from all the so-called revolutionary and angry sloganeering one hears in the media these days, but the irony is, such sloganeering is mostly emerging from people who are ending up becoming apologists of exactly the kind of forces who would deem all these artistes as being un-Islamic and fahash!
LUBP: Is it generally a good idea for fashion icons and rock stars to parade as political analysts?
NFP: Absolutely not, because they then sound silly. They should simply stick to doing what they do best because inherently their stuff is already an anti-thesis of what the reactionaries are advocating.
LUBP: What do you make of the media in general? Do you see them as objective reporters or catering to special interest groups?
NFP: Well, what can one make of the media, other than the fact that it is out to make some useless waves and lots of money. The private TV channels that are seen by 21 percent of the population, all urban, is naturally becoming a reflection of the metamorphoses taking place in what we call middle-class in Pakistan. But so far, unfortunately, the metamorphoses in this class hasn’t quite been about this class coming of age and becoming more democratic and progressive in outlook, but rather, it has become increasingly confused, verbose and rhetorical almost to the point of being downright reactionary. I belong to this class and it bothers me.
LUBP: What is your assessment of the manner in which the media has dealt with the PPP?
NFP: The PPP like any other party is not beyond criticism. It should welcome it being Pakistan’s largest democratic party. But, of course, the way some sections of the electronic media have gone about attacking its every move, this is not criticism, it’s sheer harassment.
But for how long can a channel go on behaving like this? A time will come and in fact I think it already has come, when such a channel would start looking like a spoilt buffoon. So how or why should one take a buffoon seriously?
The PPP-led government wasn’t handed a land blooming with a hundred flowers. Any government would have struggled in the current scenario. And though I am very disappointed with the way this government has gone about handling certain issues, what should one do? Whine and crib and shout for another danda-carrying marde-e-momin in uniform to once again topple a democratically elected government, or should I simply wait till the next elections so I can exercise my right to show my disappointment through the vote?
I’m sure all these political experts and hosts we see on TV these days can’t be so naïve as to not realize that the way a lot of channels have gone about exercising the concept of the freedom of the media, that if, God forbid, we do get another mard-e-momin savior, he will not be a softy like Musharraf. He will outright gag them. What will they do then?
Actually, they will continue to survive, because spouting the usual anti-India rhetoric or presenting so-called religious programs that are more about using religion as a tool to screw those who’s idea of faith you do not agree with, will always be the in thing to do in this country.
LUBP: Lately, the LUBP has taken a lot of flak for calling out fellow bloggers and for its blunt assessment of that segment of our population that calls itself “civil society”. What is your take on this and how do you feel that civil society in general has contributed towards socio-political trends and events?
NFP: What is becoming an impossibility in the mainstream media in Pakistan, has become a refreshing reality on a lot of very good blogs. The alternative political, ideological, cultural and theological narrative that rightly challenges the narrow, right-wing narrative being peddled by the mainstream media in this country, is now emerging from such blogs.
Each one of them have to realize that they maybe different in their approach in this context, but they are all on the same boat. For example, progressive blog sites like LUBP, Café Pyala, Pak Tea House and Five Rupees are very different in their assessments of the media, politics and society. But keeping in mind the larger picture, they are serving the same purpose of providing a lot of young Pakistanis out there with a different and much needed new take on things. A take that is still taboo on most mainstream media platforms.
And the civil society? Well, what can I say? They’re good at gathering to protest against the drone attacks, which, mind you, actually kill militants, and for the release of Aafia Siddiqui – or, in other words, issues that are safe. All this civil society hoopla is quite a farce, really. I do not take it seriously.
LUBP: As a PSF activist what is your assessment of PPP over the years? We will welcome critical constructive feedback and what the PPP should do to expand/regain/energize itself as a party?
NFP: The PPP is the PPP. Big, widespread, animated and utterly disorganized. All I’ll say is that the current version of the party, in spite of being at the helm of a country boiling with an unprecedented number of problems, and in spite of the party being so neurotically harassed by the media, is still in a good position to formulate a lot of policies that, say, the PPP governments under BB couldn’t.
It is still the party I vote for. And if that bothers some people, then they should know that I am also a supporter of the ANP and the MQM. So, I would suggest that the PPP needs to get a bit bolder. It must continue engaging with parties like the ANP and the MQM. I refuse be a supporter living in a fool’s paradise by insisting that the PPP should once again become a populist socialist party. That is nonsense! It is a liberal-left party but with a heavy baggage and burden of losing its secular claims during the Z A. Bhutto regime when he in an attempt to pragmatically appease, began feeing the kind of scraps to religious parties that have now become monstrous boulders.
I still think that the current PPP government has a lot of potential; but more than just concentrating on surviving, it has to come out with some bold decisions, especially in the context of what this country has been facing in the name of faith and morality. And though I am not an economist, I believe this government has handled the situation the best way one can in this environment. I mean how differently would the PML-N have acted when in 2008 the country’s economy went kaput?
It’s very easy to chant slogans about self-reliance and what not, but come on, even an economic novice like me realizes that a bankrupt and defaulting Pakistan would be ten times more dangerous, chaotic and bloody than it already is.
LUBP: Keeping in account its history and its appeal as a mass party, what should the PPP do towards developing a secular narrative and legislation?
NFP: To begin with, and this also goes for all other secular parties in Pakistan, including the ANP and the MQM, they should start sounding a lot more secular than they usually do.
They do not have to constantly evoke their religious credentials just to prove that they are not irreligious. If they believe that religion and politics should be kept separate, then this should come out clearly not only in their policies, but in their lingo and symbolism as well.
And if this government is obviously unable to provide alternative narratives and arguments in this context on private TV channels, then I have yet to see this government put much effort in introducing any such programming on the state-owned PTV as well – a channel that reaches about 79 percent of all TV viewers in Pakistan.
I remember, during the first BB government, her government introduced a fantastic programme hosted by Dr. Pervez Hoodbhoy in which he used to discuss scientific phenomenon and even commented on the achievements of both ancient and modern-day Muslim scientists.
If private channels today are brimming with crackpots masquerading as scientists, religious scholars and political analysts, this government should utilize the PTV to introduce more sensible and sound programming on science, religion and politics.
LUBP: You often write about reconstructive trends with regards to our national identity and about mutually accepting and tolerating our multiple ethnic, sectarian, religious and cultural identities. In terms of working towards a secular future for Pakistan, how important is the development of a social phenomena that celebrates heterogeneity or can secularism only be achieved by treating the works and words of Jinnah and Iqbal as sacred texts and building on the mists of our past?
NFP: Unfortunately, in Pakistan, anyone claiming to hold liberal or secular views is both directly and indirectly forced to be apologetic about his or beliefs. This apologetic behavior then usually sees such individuals constantly using the examples of Jinnah and Iqbal, saying how liberal, secular, or, in Iqbal’s case, how moderate and enlightened, they were.
Well, the truth is, Jinnah unfortunately will always remain to be a huge enigma in this respect. What was Jinnah’s Pakistan? Who knows, but yes, it certainly wasn’t something that it became many years after his death.
Secularists, leftists and liberals should break out of this apologetic mindset. They can use Jinnah and Iqbal when it is necessary, but, hey, Jinnah and Iqbal have been used by the reactionaries as well, haven’t they?
If one claims to be a progressive, secular or liberal, then he or she should talk about how the current reality is calling for Pakistan to once and for all overthrow the self-imposed burden of being the so-called bastion of Islam and look forward to being a progressive, tolerant Muslim majority republic. One should now be able to do this without always finding the need to invoke Jinnah or Iqbal. Enough of the apologetics.
LUBP: Also, can we choose to ignore our nationalist leaders like ZAB, BB, Bizenjo, G. M. Syed, Haider Bux Jatoi and Bacha Khan and their appeal to the masses in our combined struggle for a secular Pakistan or can secularism be constructed simply from Jinnah’s August 11th speech to the Constituent Assembly?
NFP: Legacies – secular or theological – need to be looked and studied critically to see what went right or what went wrong during the time those people associated with the legacies were doing what they have become famous or infamous for.
Of course one can’t but respect the politicians that you have mentioned, but I’d rather look at their weaknesses and vulnerabilities in trying to construct whatever they thought was secularism, or progressivism or liberalism. I am specially critical of ZAB in this respect.
But the truth is, secularists and liberals in Pakistan must stop looking backwards for inspiration. It’s an entirely different Pakistan today. A Pakistan on the brink of turning itself into a Somalia or a myopic, widespread reactive society that instinctively and without much thought is seen to applaud populist narratives brimming with isolationist, intolerant and delusional notions of patriotism, politics and faith.
Like I said, enough of the apologetics. I personally have no doubts about me being a Muslim Pakistani. I believe in God, but why should I have to wear my beliefs on my sleeve? I’ve seen young people wearing T-Shirts saying, ‘I am a Muslim.’ But who is doubting that? I never thought that they were Martians, so why the exhibitionism?
I am a believing Muslim who is a staunch secularist. I do not see a contradiction in this. I do not have to evoke my belief in God, or prove how Jinnah was also a secularist, to make my point.
My points should be proven in showing how the whole idea of a theological state has been disastrous for this country, over and over again, and how if Pakistan has to advance and survive as a cohesive state in the future, it can only do so through democracy and by having a progressive relationship between all of its many ethnicities, religions and sects and with the world at large.
LUBP: Thank You Nadeem for such an enlightening interview.
It was so very reassuring to read NFP’s comments on progressive blogs, in contrast to the ‘farce hoopla’ of the ‘civl’ society:
“What is becoming an impossibility in the mainstream media in Pakistan, has become a refreshing reality on a lot of very good blogs. The alternative political, ideological, cultural and theological narrative that rightly challenges the narrow, right-wing narrative being peddled by the mainstream media in this country, is now emerging from such blogs.
Each one of them have to realize that they maybe different in their approach in this context, but they are all on the same boat. For example, progressive blog sites like LUBP, Café Pyala, Pak Tea House and Five Rupees are very different in their assessments of the media, politics and society. But keeping in mind the larger picture, they are serving the same purpose of providing a lot of young Pakistanis out there with a different and much needed new take on things. A take that is still taboo on most mainstream media platforms.
And the civil society? Well, what can I say? They’re good at gathering to protest against the drone attacks, which, mind you, actually kill militants, and for the release of Aafia Siddiqui – or, in other words, issues that are safe. All this civil society hoopla is quite a farce, really. I do not take it seriously.”
my favourite part was the last two questions about NFP’s opinions about secularism. Couldn’t agree more with his statement “But the truth is, secularists and liberals in Pakistan must stop looking backwards for inspiration.”
NFP’s been a bastion of secularism for a lot of Pakistani youth out there. A fierce fighter and inspiration for a lot of very intelligent young minds now producing excellant writings on various blogs and in many newspapers. Good interview.
Nadeem, Excellent interview!
And LUBP, Thank You, Thank You, Thank You For Making This Interview Happen!!!!
Kudos to you guys for doing the almost-impossible: Actually getting NFP to give an interview. 🙂
Maza agaya.
i think he is right present PPP can formulate alot of policies/legislation which PPP under BB couldn’t .
As NFP has pointed out that PTV should play an active role in educating the masses, I would like to inform all that PTV already is running some very enlightening, educating programmes like ” Mulalma, hosted by Dr. Mehdi Hasan” and another on “History and Archeology with Dr Mubarak Ali.
Along with these it has moderate intellectual Khurshid Nadeem as a host in another talk show and Azam Khalil also have a programme who invites guests like Wajahat Masood, Khalid Chauhdry and many other such names. But as we know PTV credibility is badly dented in previous regimes, it will take time or a good strategy to attract people watch it.
And we know people like style not substance, as NFP excessively has written on Anchorocrcy.
So very enlightening.
Today in 2010, the PPP is indeed lucky to have erudite ‘voters’ like NFP side by side with those whose “hut leaks in the rain” as ZAB famously described the downtrodden back in the late 1960’s. But Nadeem is much more than a mere voter; he comes across as an ideologue-cum-activist who knows how to walk his talk – one that any party would love to have in their ranks, in fact shouldn’t do without. The struggle for secularism, pluralism and civilian supremacy is a long one but with people like him, there is always a hope.
Bala se hum ne na dekha tou aur dekhayn gay
Farogh e gulshan o saut e hazar ka mausam
As he clearly mentions that he is a supporter of PPP, ANP and MQM; in other words a supporters of all major secular parties in pakistan.
And I also agree with him that that they too need to walk the talk when it comes to claiming being secular.
As usual, as in his writings, in this interview too, NFP comes out as a man who is not afriad to both face and speak the truth and I also admire him from being man enough to be self-critical as well.
A critical reflection, for a change:
NFP says: “So, I would suggest that the PPP…must continue engaging with parties like the ANP and the MQM.”
Here is a glimpse of today’s “pragmatic” politics of the PPP, ANP and MQM (and other parties):
پاکستان میں ’عوام کی آنکھوں میں دھول جھونکنے‘ کا محاورہ سیاستدانوں کی زبانی کئی دہائیوں سے سننے کو ملتا رہا ہے لیکن اس کا عملی اور واضح نمونہ جمعہ کو پارلیمان کے ایوان بالا سینیٹ میں اس وقت دیکھنے کو ملا جب جنرل سیلز ٹیکس اور فنانس بلوں کے متعلق سفارشات قومی اسمبلی کو بھجوانے کے بارے میں تحاریک پر ووٹنگ ہوئی۔
حکومت کے مجوزہ دونوں بلوں کا مقصد اور خوبیاں ’امپورٹڈ فنانس منسٹر‘ عبدالحفیظ شیخ یہ بتاتے رہے کہ اس سے ٹیکس نہ دینے والے تاجروں اور صنعتکاروں کو ٹیکس کے جال میں لانا اور ملکی سطح پر مالی وسائل میں اضافہ کرنا ہے۔ لیکن اپوزیشن کی مسلم لیگ (ن) اور مسلم لیگ (ق) کے علاوہ حکومت کی تین اتحادی جماعتیں متحدہ قومی موومنٹ (ایم کیو ایم)، عوامی نیشنل پارٹی (اے این پی) اور جمیعت علماء اسلام (جے یو آئی) نے اس پر ایک ہفتے سے اودھم مچائے رکھا کہ اس سے عوام پر مہنگائی کا بم گرے گا اور حکومت عوام دشمن اقدامات سے باز رہے۔
حکومت کی اتحادی اور حزب مخالف کی جماعتیں جس طرح جی ایس ٹی کی مخالفت کرتے رہے اس سے تو یقین ہوگیا تھا کہ حکومت کبھی سینیٹ سے منظور نہیں کرواسکے گی لیکن عوام کی وکالت کرنے والے رہنماؤں نے لمحہ بہ لمحہ ایسے پلٹے کھائے کہ عقل دنگ رہ گئی۔
اے این پی کے سربراہ اسفندیار ولی کی جب صدر آصف علی زرداری سے ملاقات ہوئی تو ان کے تحفظات بھی ختم ہوگئے۔
ایک اور حکومتی اتحادی جماعت ایم کیو ایم کو منانے رحمٰن ملک اور حفیظ شیخ کراچی گئے تو انہوں نے عوام دشمن جی ایس ٹی کی مخالفت اس شرط پر ختم کرنے کا یقین دلایا کہ کراچی میں منشیات اور اسلحہ مافیا کے نام پر اے این پی کے خلاف کارروائی کریں۔
حکومت نے جمعہ اور سنیچر کی درمیانی شب کراچی میں کارروائی کرکے بیسیوں لوگوں کو گرفتار کرلیا اور ایم کیو ایم راضی ہوگئی۔ لیکن پھر اے این پی نے جی ایس ٹی کو عوام دشمن قرار دے کر مخالفت کا اعلان کیا۔ سنیچر کی صبح سینیٹ کی کارروائی سے پہلے گرفتار ’مافیا‘ کے لوگ رہا ہوگئے تو اے این پی نے کہا کہ ان کے عوام دشمن تحفظات ختم ہوگئے ہیں۔ لیکن ایم کیو ایم نے پھر سے عوام دشمن جی ایس ٹی کی مخالفت کا رونا رونا شروع کردیا۔
سیاسی جماعتوں نے جس طرح عوام کی آڑ میں جی ایس ٹی کا رونا رویا وہ ایسا کمال ہے کہ انہیں اس پر ’کمالِ فن ایوارڈ‘ ملنا چاہیے۔
http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/pakistan/2010/11/101126_gst_senate_diary_rh.shtml
A thought provoking interview.
NFP says “I remember, during the first BB government, her government introduced a fantastic programme hosted by Dr. Pervez Hoodbhoy in which he used to discuss scientific phenomenon and even commented on the achievements of both ancient and modern-day Muslim scientists.
If private channels today are brimming with crackpots masquerading as scientists, religious scholars and political analysts, this government should utilize the PTV to introduce more sensible and sound programming on science, religion and politics”
PPP must try to introduce scientific method of thinking among the Pakistani youth, that is the only way to combat fanatacism.
Great work! We should have more of a series of such interviews
Scientific education, critical thinking and evidence based understanding of the natural world can overcome religious fundamentalism, superstition, intolerance and human suffering.
@ Ali Arqam
Dr Mubarik Ali show is one of most interesting show on television .
This guy is the most amazing person to walk this land!!
Wah! Zarbardast. About time NFP should write that book on urban Pakistani culture and politics of Pakistan which only he alone can write.
The Editorial Board of LUBP is intelectually dishonest because any comment criticial of PPP is being deleted. You better change your name from Critical ppp to something else.
Editor’s note: None of your comments have been deleted, only your avatar has been slightly modified because you are posing yourself as ‘Zardari’ or ‘Gilani’, instead of using your real name or the names of your real leaders. Don’t worry, we will not delete your critical comments as long as they are in the domain of civility and based on your true self. If you don’t listen to this warning, your IP will be published and you will be permanently blocked from this website.
It’s obvious Mr. Imran Angry Khan is not here for NFP’s interview. Any comments on that, Mr. I Am Pissed At LUBP?
“Editor’s note: None of your comments have been deleted, only your avatar has been slightly”
[BUT THE WAY YOU ARE CHANGING YOUR SURNAMES IS REALLY A MATTER OF DISREPUTE FOR YOUR FAMILY. EDITOR]
Now that is not a factual statement. I have a copy of everything that I posted and you deleted or changed and deleted. Do you want me to post the whole lot again just to prove that your statement above is yet another lie
Gillani, Imran Khan … Dude, make up your mind, what is your name??
If you think LUBP is editing your posts, kindly stop editing your own name. What next, Qazi Hussain?
@Junaid, hahaha Nicely done.
@Imran Khan/Qazi Hussain/Hamid Gul, I don’t know how LUBP is handling your comments (and they have the right to moderate them) but surely it can’t be worse than the way you are handling your name. You could take the same advice that you so generously offered to this blog and decide on a name…..
It was a good reading this interview. Gave a detailed account of how NFP reflects upon socio-political aspects of this society. Gave alot of clarity to comparatively less informed youth of this country who’s like many young people been living with a guilt until recently.
I agree with how he has analysed the current PPP government’s performance and approach various issues, however, I would like some more solid basis on the economic front of PPP not for my satisfaction but to satisfy those staunch critics of PPP who want (like NFP said) a Mard-e-Momin to take over. Their main argument is on the economic performance of this government and particularly use the various corruption charges (though mostly unproven) to criticize this government and I usually have no answer to that.
May be LUBP can write some good articles to englighten PPP supporters like me.
Good post, Shahid. However, I do tend to agree what NFP says about the important economic issue you have mentioned.
“And though I am not an economist, I believe this government has handled the situation the best way one can in this environment. I mean how differently would the PML-N have acted when in 2008 the country’s economy went kaput?
It’s very easy to chant slogans about self-reliance and what not, but come on, even an economic novice like me realizes that a bankrupt and defaulting Pakistan would be ten times more dangerous, chaotic and bloody than it already is.”
@Imran Khan / Gilani what exactly would you like to say on NFP’s interview?
he is my favourite…columnist…great comrade…keep it up….smokers corner is going…great….love…
NFP’s is not only the kind of columnist that is the need of the hour, but his also the kind of secularist that parties like PPP, ANP and MQM need. Honest, bold, knowledgable but at the same time not afraid to be self-critical as well.
He has a big readership in Pakistan and now I think he is also one of the most read Pakistani English columnists in India and the West.
He must go on.
Solid stuff. An intriguing interview of one of the country’s most controversial columnists.
Always interesting to see what NFP has to say.
NFP has grown in leaps and bounds. I have been following his writings from the 90s when he was trying to offer some kind of leftist Utopia to the youth, but in the last few years his articles in Dawn have been very realistic and commanding.
NFP is NFP, and having followed his Dawn blog for a very long time now, I can expect him to say things that I would completely disagree with. But when he says that the drones “actually kill militants”, he is only half-right, unless he seriously thinks that the drones kill less innocents than the suicide bombers – in which case all that I can say is that the 10-or-so years of hard drug abuse have left him delusional (possibly literally) and as brain-fried as (if not more than) Ali Azmat.
@Ali S
What a nasty comparison of the drone attacks on known hideouts of Al Qaeda / Taliban (which at times do cause some inadvertent civilian casualties unfortunately) with the indiscriminate attacks on shrines, mosques, imambargahs, markets and jigahs by extremist Deobandi terrorists.
Now don’t tell me you have not been to a rehabilitation centre lately!
LOL@Sara
These brainwashed Zaid Hamid/ISI/Geo groupies have no clue what to do with the consistant onslaught they recieve at the hands of NFP.
Tich, tich. They badmouth him, threat him, accuse him, and still NFP goes on showing them the mirror.
Grow up, Ali asS, and face the truth. NFP has not only outlasted jerks like Zia and Mushy, but also those false prophets that idiots like you follow.
Once upon a time there used to be just NFP, but by God’s grace, we now have fantastic blogs like LUBP, Cafe Pyala and so many more, making life hell for these buggers.
Jeeay NFP! Have a drink on me, bro. 🙂
@Cafe Pyalee
🙂
.
gaye din ke tanha thi main anjuman mein
yahan ab mere razadan aur bhi hain
I agree, brave people such as NFP, Kamran Shafi, Abbas Ather, Tahir Sarwar Mir deserve our full support and appreciation.
well it’s not just that NFP have fan’s in only pakistan, I am just hooked to the guy, well it may be true that he writes in context of pakistan, but many of his thoughts goes beyond region and religion
Hats off man
Very insightful interview, loved it!
Cheers!
Abdul Nishapuri too khota he
kasf tu chooha hai
Thnx LUBP ! gr8 interview ….
LUBP Exclusive: A critical interview with Nadeem F. Paracha
cbqttthc http://www.g38841y0g36bxvfas9l2r8c8q23t0h1ys.org/
acbqttthc
[url=http://www.g38841y0g36bxvfas9l2r8c8q23t0h1ys.org/]ucbqttthc[/url]
ポール スミス 服 女性
ゴヤール 財布グアム
ジミーチュウ ハワイ限定
ボッテガ 偽物 名刺
クロエ 北川
シャネル 年代調べ
フェラガモ 財布 ピンク
セリーヌ 中古 服
アルマーニ ベビー 蝶ネクタイ
サングラス 顔文字
iPhone 風 筆箱
ティファニー 0.05
diesel 財布 イオン
フェリージ はっ水
orient in box zip
アディダス 幅
テンデンス 腕時計 クロノグラフ 意味
ロレックス 青
マイケルコース 西武百貨店
アニエスベー ポロシャツ女性
シチズン 時計 茨城
時計 時報 アプリ
tissot prs516 gt
diesel 財布 口コミ
bally 財布 手入れ
カルティエ ボールペン
ジバンシー 20代 貯金
楽器 カラオケ
ケイトスペード の折り財布
精彩游戏就来
老虎机的程序规律
要的就是刺激玩的就是人生
澳门赌场真人秀
精彩游戏就来
威廉希尔中文官网
要的就是刺激玩的就是人生
重庆时时彩平台
精彩游戏就来
老虎机游戏下载
要的就是刺激玩的就是人生
九五至尊娱乐官网
我公司为您提供
仓博娱乐棋牌游戏平台
你的需求我来满足请进
澳门网上赌场
我公司为您提供
澳门真人赌场官网
你的需求我来满足请进
澳门威尼斯人赌场
精彩游戏就来
百家乐楼梯缆
要的就是刺激玩的就是人生
波音平台网址大全
我公司为您提供
九莲宝灯游戏
我公司为您提供
老虎机的程序规律
你的需求我来满足请进
5060全讯网
我公司为您提供
ewin真钱娱乐
要的就是刺激玩的就是人生
大奖娱乐平台
我公司为您提供
体育投注技巧
時計 大学生 革
バッグ チェーン 短くする
mcm 風 リュック
ハミルトン 腕時計 口コミ
ゴローズ 栄
精彩游戏就来
老虎机遥控器的价格
你的需求我来满足请进
大赢家足球即时比分
精彩游戏就来
通宝娱乐场下载中心
精彩游戏就来
凯时娱乐 官网网址
我公司为您提供
真钱开心吧游戏
ゴローズ 大全
トッズ エナメル 靴 手入れ
你的需求我来满足请进
迪威娱乐缅甸在线
要的就是刺激玩的就是人生
uedbet官网手机版
精彩游戏就来
爱拼娱乐城官方网站
要的就是刺激玩的就是人生
亚洲通娱乐城在线
精彩游戏就来
优德88娱乐场
精彩游戏就来
jj九莲宝灯棋牌
我公司为您提供
通宝娱乐168官网
你的需求我来满足请进
注册送体验金
精彩游戏就来
九莲宝灯平台
Nach meiner Meinung sind Sie nicht recht. Ich kann die Position verteidigen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM, wir werden umgehen.
kaikesn
iPhone nマーク
フォリフォリ 指輪 3連
マイケルコース 買取
gregory 手帳
キプリング グアム dfs
ジミーチュウ インスタ dm
ミュウミュウ バッグ 形
サンローラン パリ 名刺入れ
ダンヒル バック 赤
スウォッチ お菓子
d&g 時計 ベルト ラバー
ブルガリ アショーマ
クロムハーツ 自由が丘
スウォッチ lb153
マイケルコース 時計 春
アディダス 時計特徴
プラダ サカゼン
オリエント ers メール
ノーノーヘア 原理 不明
ニューバランス 996番
ディーゼル オーバーオール
オリエント 和訳
ディーゼル スマホケース
トリーバーチ かフルラ
アノラック メンズ tシャツ
パタゴニア 大きいサイズ
ブルガリ 箱付き
ニクソン 千葉 ットマン
ジミーチュウ 財布 レプリカ
ロエベ ハンドバッグ
iPhone 遅い
イルビゾンテ 男性
マイケルコース バックセール品
ロレックス 一覧
ディーゼル 福袋 2015
靴 中敷 なし
コーチ 年齢
ケノン 髭剃り 3枚刃
フルラ 長島
ハミルトン 意味 line