The Lone Murderer in Oslo Represents No Emerging Christian Extremist Group – by Rusty Walker
About the author: Rusty Walker is an Independent Political Analyst, educator, author, Vietnam veteran-era U.S. Air Force, from a military family, retired college professor, former Provost (Collins College, U.S.A.), artist, musician and family man. Rusty Walker is an ardent supporter of Pakistan.
The New York Times did no favors for worldwide Muslim – Christian relations when it insisted on the sensationalist headline “As Horrors Emerge, Norway Charges Christian Extremist.” My problem with the headline is that it begs the question that is not answered in the article: is there a Christian Extremist Movement? Are we to assume there may be legions of Christian Soldiers celebrating this mass murder? I didn’t think of these questions, but these are the queries burning up the Cyber-sphere following press stories, in Online blogs, Facebook Groups, and news article comments. And the answer is, “No there isn’t any existing or emerging Christian Extremist Group.”
Anders Behring Breivik, the Norwegian that was charged Saturday with attacks in Oslo after murdering 92 people left behind a detailed manifesto outlining his preparations and calling for a what the New York Times contends was a “Christian war to defend Europe against the threat of Muslim domination.” He was identified only by a policeman as a “right-wing fundamentalist Christian,’ but, that remains to be seen. This has not been verified, because as yet there is no record of him belonging to a Fundamentalist Christian church, no wide-spread group proselytizing, or even a modest following of like-minded people. However, we get a glimpse of real truth as the article manages to include something more responsible to answer questions about his nature, his “acquaintances described him as a gun-loving Norwegian obsessed with what he saw as the threats of multiculturalism and Muslim immigration.” (I inserted the key points in bold) – This is a better description of the killer and motives, and it has little to do with Christendom, and more to do with guns, obsession and hatred of Muslim culture (Islamophobia).
The point is, the irresponsible press and the inflammatory blogs are once igniting the flames against the Christian-right and its demonization to create fear; also indulging in what constitutes a perceived balance in the news of the relentless, radical-Islamic Caliphate narrative. The uniformed can then speculate with visions of non-existent legions of Fundamental Christians clashing with Muslims- or, killing people out of fear of Muslims en masse, which in the 21st Century is an absurd notion, but, a lone killer is always a possibility in the world at large. The backlash of Christian hate-speech is already hitting the Blogosphere. All this based on the rambling papers of a lunatic. The intriguing phrase “Clash of Civilizations,” re-emerged in Samuel P. Huntington’s 1996 book. It was a dubious thesis for many scholars at the time for a modern world, and it is still a stretch to attempt to apply it to the high-tech world of today over a decade later, notwithstanding terrorist cells and asymmetrical warfare.
Playing to sensationalism, the New York Times was sure to spread the Breivek private dogma by including this gem from his papers: “a secret meeting in London in April 2002 to reconstitute the Knights Templar, a Crusader military order. It says the meeting was attended by nine representatives of eight European countries, evidently including Mr. Breivik, with an additional three members unable to attend, including a “European-American.” Knights Templar! Crusader military order! Members! And, a “European-American!” …Compelling stuff to exaggerate tales around, indeed.
Let me get digest this for a moment, though…Anders Behring Breivek had 9 people willing to listen to him in a meeting 9 years ago – Some Crusading group that is! Breivek isn’t a soldier of Jesus, he is a pathologically disturbed, lone, mass-murderer.
It is a shame that one man can get such extensive media coverage at all but his verbal assault on Muslims makes it a double tragedy for our turbulent times. Headlines should have covered the loss and they did; the human toll is newsworthy, of course. Still, the American, European and South Asia press, blogs and Facebook groups appear to have more questions than answers- precisely because there is no real story here of membership in an organization of Fundamentalists- it is a pointless human tragedy. That is your story; loss of innocent bystanders by a ruthless killer of 92 individuals, all of whom have families mourning them- all asking why?
So, the responsibility of the press is not to leave too many unanswered questions. Will Durant once wrote in the History of Civilization, that where there are unanswered questions “leaves a void,” and the void we sometimes “fill with demons.” So, some will default to their favorite conspiracy theories. Timothy McVeigh, will come up again- who was a marginal Christian at best, who simply hated the US government, and was also a loner, but the same recycled misrepresentation to associate him with Christians continues and will spring up in the media again, so there can be a white, American fundamentalist- Christian who blows things up – the trouble with this is, that McVeigh was not a practicing Christian and no motives or agenda associated with a faith.
Few intelligent, practicing Christians have issues with moderate Islam. Christians, Jews and Muslims share not only the same Old Testament holy figures, but hold the same values that we who were raised Christians hold dear, a love of family, ethical values, the work ethic, and faith in one God, with respect for other religions. No Fundamental Christian Crusade exists, except the one that abides in Breivik’s disturbed mind. The devil is in the details, and the details here point to one very unholy murderer, who represents one person: himself.
It might be useful to point out something as an addendum to my article. There are plenty of Christians that are Islamophobic, or anti-Muslim. No one is saying there isn’t. But, it is isn’t hypocritical to point out that this particular gunman is not part of a large group of anti-Muslims. Even if were to turn out that this was an entirely Christian-based hate-crime, and he feels he is some kind of Christian against Muslim world, my point is the same- that we should not alarm the Muslim community that this is any great Crusade starting; or, that Americans are in agreement with his hate-speech. They are not. It just adds unnecessarily to the alarm that good Muslims already feel. We should all be in agreement that Christians can be good, or bad, just as often irrational, or radical, as any group of people can be. But in the rush to indict Christians over this anomaly, as if to say, “Look, the Christians are just as bad as the terrorists,” it is simply myth-making. Can a Christian be as bad as a terrorist? Well sure. There are criminals in all parts of society. But, making an exaggerated claim that Breivek is part of some organization sweeping Europe or the U.S. is simply untrue.
The basis of this essay is simply to point out clarity on the facts at hand. There are certainly Christians that have a religious narrative against Muslims. That isn’t right- There is no question about that. But, there is not a force of religious zealots that are banding together to kill Muslims, or blowing themselves and innocents up in the name of a Christian God.- This stubborn fact doesn’t demonize the good and moderate Muslims. And, it doesn’t elevate Christians in any way. This also does not mean that there aren’t Christians that are far-Right extremists- there are far too many of them. And, there are far too many stupid people in the world, as well! They are wrong, and need to be stood up to and certainly, there exists double standards, but, readers shouldn’t confuse this fact with the Oslo incident. No one is glorifying Christians, I certainly am not. But, the rush to elevate one lone killer to a Crusade of anti-Muslim warriors is untrue and serves no good purpose for Christians or Muslims.
Excellent post. Demonization and stereotyping of Christian-right because of one insane man is highly irresponsible and unacceptable. I agree that “the rush to elevate one lone killer to a Crusade of anti-Muslim warriors is untrue and serves no good purpose for Christians or Muslims.”
Thank you so much Abdul, I very much appreciate it!
crazy people will always be there. in order to get their agenda executed, they take refuge of an ideology or religion. What the norwegian killer has done is show his insanity and at the same time saw the loopholes in the system. Kill dozens of people and get 21 years sentence which I am sure will be completed in a few years time after remissions.
@Rusty Just by dismissing the killer as a lone gunman and maniac, will be the same mistake, which we have made in Pakistan. The unchecked rise of radicalism in any society destroys it. I am not saying that there is a crusade on its way, but my point is that every aspect of this crime should be looked into. If there is a radical element involved, it should be curbed before things get out of hand.
” Rusty Walker ” as the name suggests the article itself is rusty trying to camouflage the brutal western mentality..
Oh yes, certinly, sure, why not? The holocaust was also the act of only one man…it had nothing to do with the civilized and bright european mentality, and so did the massacre of Bosnians too. And on the basis of only one act, you cannot blame dozens of racist groups brewing in Europe preparing another holocaust in Europe (which is certainly something new and unheard of in entire golden history of Europe).
Awais Khan- I agree with you.
Pfc. Naser Abdo, a Muslim was arrested July 27, 2011 at a motel several miles from Fort Hood and admitted to planning to blow up a restaurant frequented by servicemen. This incident at Ft. Hood affords me the opportunity to confirm my thesis published at LUBP this week from the Muslim point of view. That is, we should not fall into crowd-mentality or groupthink regarding ethnic or religious stereotypes that are not based in fact, or believe unsubstantiated claims based on fear tactics. Some comments I have been reading, asked of the Norway murders: “What if the gunman in Oslo were a Muslim?” My answer would be the same one I gave in the article about Christians, and am now giving regarding Pfc. Naser Abdo.
Just because Abdo states he a Muslim, or is a Muslim, or is even aligned with radical Muslim sympathies, doesn’t necessarily mean he is part of a terrorist network. If operatives are terrorists, national security forces can identify them quickly using everything from investigative detective work, to cell phones, to computer forensics to interagency and international communications without question in a relatively short time – it won’t be the press.
In the first case at Fort Hood in 2009 the gunman was Major Nidal Malik Hasan. He was a practicing Muslim who killed thirteen servicemen and set off a firestorm of press- point and counterpoint – over, “Was he a terrorist or not? Was he a domestic, “home grown” Muslim radical? We have seen very few episodes since then. I still tend to classify Hasan as a “want-a-be” terrorist. It looked more as if he was “inspired” like… was “insired by current events. Single individuals that are filled with hate over religious, social or political issues are a problem with which every nation will have to contend. Every city has its pathological sociopaths- its “nut cases.”
Real terrorists aligned with radical networks are not a mystery. The Mumbai bombings were too strategically sophisticated for an amateur. LeT are not amateurs. McVeigh is an example of a lone wolf with some skill-sets who can do a lot of damage, but is not part of a network or movement. I believe Pfc. Naser Abdo, as Muslim fits into the same category, a Muslim
Pfc. Abdo had spoken out against the 2009 Fort Hood shootings saying, “the attacks ran against” his beliefs and were “an act of aggression by a man and not by Islam.” He subsequently requested “Conscientious Objector” status. But, his religious convictions are dubious, considering his status: He was AWOL from Fort Campbell, Ky. and Abdo recently was charged with possessing child pornography. He may be a Muslim, but, one copy-cat gunman does not a Terrorist-militia make. He is more likely a disgruntled GI and the shame of it all is that the story once again gives bigots conspiracy theorists a chance to cast doubt on good Muslims and further drives suspicion in the military ranks.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/28/naser-abdo-confession-attack_n_912553.html
I don’t have the space to write a book so some things go unstated. My thesis has nothing to do with “dismissing” or leaving an “unchecked rise of radicalism.”
Radical acts should be dealt with with impunity, immediately in all cities whether Olso, Fort Hood installations, were lone wolf ops occured, and where real terrorist networks kill innocents from Bali to Mumbai.
By the way, LeT is an example of “unchecked rise of radicalism.” The Pak Army “dismisses” the TTP in FATA, while Taliban destroys tribal villages and Shiites alike, with the assistance of ISI and Pak Army.
I am not soft on lone perpetrators. Anders Behring Breivik should be given the death penalty. That is not a dismissal or leaving radicalism unchecked.