NAB to re-open cases against Nawaz Sharif, family and other leaders of PML-N
Here is an unexpected development of the Supreme Court’s decision against the NRO. We at LUBP condemn the lopsided accountability of politicians while the Supreme Court remains silent on innumerable charges of corruption against many serving and retired officers of Pakistan Army.
Comments
Tags: Corruption, Democracy, NAB, Nawaz Sharif, Pakistan Army, PMLN
Latest Comments
Nawaz, Shahbaz not on the same wavelength
Saturday, December 05, 2009
By By Tariq Butt
ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) “hawks” and “doves” are engrossed in a closed-door debate about the party’s firm policy towards President Asif Ali Zardari, insiders say.
PML-N Quaid Nawaz Sharif has emerged as the “soft-liner”, who wants to give more time to Zardari and doesn’t wish to rock the boat instantly by taking an extremely hawkish view.
On the other hand, insiders portray the leader of the opposition in the National Assembly, Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan, and Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif as hardliners, who peddle an aggressive strategy, saying that they have no hope in an unreliable president, who has over and over again breached his pledges and commitments.
According to informed PML-N leaders, so far the policy followed by Nawaz Sharif is prevailing, as the party is not going for the whole hog against Zardari. It will continue till the time the PML-N chief changes his mind.
They say Nawaz fears derailment of the democratic system to be followed by a chaotic situation if the president is put under too much attack and further pushed to the wall.
“Nawaz Sharif feels that Zardari is already retreating. His view is that since the president is collapsing due to his own follies and idiocy, the PML-N should not become a part of any game plan to bring about his fall,” one insider said.
In the heart of his hearts, the source said, Nawaz Sharif knew when he would come to power by pulling down Zardari, he would also face an aggressive and hurt Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), whose performance in the opposition had always been much better than being in the government. He too would not be allowed to rule in peace as Benazir Bhutto-led PPP had done to him in 1993 when her MNAs had staged the drama of depositing their resignations with the then President Ghulam Ishaq Khan, to pave the way for the dismissal of his government two months later.
The source said Nawaz Sharif wanted to avoid the repeat and replay of the vicious cycle of destabilisation of the Nineties after every couple of years of the coming in place of a new government although he too did not have very high hopes from the president. “Nawaz Sharif wants to keep Zardari under pressure but doesn’t wish to take his attack to a level where the president falls,” the insider said adding that the PML-N chief is aware that some elements are misinterpreting his present strategy and dubbing him as friendly opposition, which is not the case.
However, he said, Chaudhry Nisar and Shahbaz Sharif remain too much “committed” against Zardari and hold the view that even a working relationship could not be continued with him because of his track record. It was for this very reason that Chaudhry Nisar even refused to be a part of Nawaz Sharif-led PML-N delegation that recently held talks with the president at the Aiwan-e-Sadr.
Nawaz Sharif’s recent famous remark in a Geo interview that he would come in the way of removal of the present government was not received well by the hawkish elements, apart from Chaudhry Nisar and Shahbaz Sharif. Not only the president but also several federal ministers were happy over this development. PML-N elements, agreeing with Nawaz Sharif’s strategy, express some kind of hope that President Zardari would not further delay the scrapping of the 17th Amendment, a key demand of the party chief, and accept his other demands.
They say that in order to show that he had good intentions towards Nawaz Sharif, the president should immediately strike down the bar on the two-time former prime minister serving the third term that is now only specific to the PML-N chief. It was also directed against Benazir Bhutto when Pervez Musharraf had imposed it.
http://www.thenews.com.pk/print1.asp?id=211742
Mr Nawaz Sharif should adopt a harsh line and finish this day to day tension giving people sleepless nights [Courtesy GEO TV/JANG GROUP]
Drag Zardari and others in the Court of Law.
It said in February 2001, the Sunday Times published a report based on transcripts of 32 audio tapes, which revealed that Qayyum convicted Benazir Bhutto and Zardari for political reasons. The transcripts of the recordings reproduced by the newspaper showed that Qayyum asked the then prime minister Nawaz Sharif’s anti-corruption chief, Saifur Rehman, for advice on the sentence: “Now you tell me how much punishment do you want me to give her?” Malik Qayyum in new row over rigging By Muhammad Ahmad Noorani AG caught on tape again; denies HRW report Saturday, February 16, 2008 http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=12981
The Friday Times, Editorial by Najam Sethi, Feb. 15, 2001
http://www.chowk.com/interacts/4948/1/0/a
The Sunday Times of London has recently published a story that damns politicians and state institutions alike in Pakistan. The report suggests that an official of the Intelligence Bureau was ordered in 1998 by the head of the Accountability Bureau, Mr Saif ur Rehman, to tap the telephones of Justice Abdul Qayyum of the Lahore High Court (illegal order by politicians, illegal implementation by IB). The IB official later pocketed the tapes and decamped to London, eventually handing them over to the British newspaper. If true, the conversations between Justice Qayyum and Saif ur Rehman, Khalid Anwar (then law minister), Mrs Abdul Qayyum and others are fascinating because they reveal the political bankruptcy of the system and those who are elected or nominated to make it work.
The tapes suggest that Justice Qayyum was bullied by the then prime minister Nawaz Sharif and his minions into convicting former prime minister Benazir Bhutto and her spouse Asif Zardari for corruption in 1998. This means that – irrespective of the substantial evidence laid against the two accused – the trial wasn`t conducted entirely in a free or fair manner as required by law. Ms Bhutto shrieked as much during and after the trial but critics, including TFT, dismissed her allegations against Justice Qayyum as inconceivable. Hence when the review petition comes up for hearing before the Supreme Court on February 26, the court will be hard put to choose between acquitting the couple or ordering a fresh trial. If it clings to a third option – upholding the verdict – it risks being tarred by the same brush.