Why do Takfiri Deobandi militants of Sipah Sahaba Taliban want to kill Qazi Hussain Ahmed?
posted by Abdul Nishapuri | December 19, 2012 | In Original ArticlesQazi Hussain Ahmed is one of very few Sunni clerics of Pakistan who has always condemned incidents of Shia genocide by Takfiri terrorists of Pakistan. He played a key role with Shia cleric Allama Sajid Naqvi and other Sunni clerics (Shah Ahmed Noorani etc) in condemning hate speech and violence against Shias by terrorists of Sipah-e-Sahaba (ASWJ-LeJ). Despite our political differences with him, we respect this aspect of Qazi sahib’s personality.
On 19 November 2012, an attack by a female Deobandi militant (suicide bomber) targeting Qazi Hussain Ahmed’s convoy was masterminded by Commander Omar Khalid, the Mohmand Agency’s Ameer of the Taliban, which had been gunning for the former Jamaat-e-Islami leader for months. Qazi Hussain Ahmed was sought because of his April 2012 interview wherein he had described the Afghan Taliban’s resistance against the US-led Coalition Forces in Afghanistan as “true jehad” and that of the Pakistani Taliban in Pakistan as “un-Islamic”. The former Jamaat-e-Islami Ameer narrowly escaped a bomb attack on Monday, 19 November, when a female suicide bomber, who was wearing a burqa, exploded herself near Qazi Hussain’s convoy in the Mohmand tribal agency. The pieces of female clothes and hair found from the site make the investigators believe that the suicide bomber was a lady”. Although no one has claimed responsibility for the attack so far, which seems unusual, the fact remains that Qazi Hussain had been on TTP’s hit list for the past seven months – since his April 2012 interview which had prompted Hakimullah to criticise him in an audio message, accusing him of supporting “the US-allied rulers of Pakistan”.
http://youtu.be/bCCnA3qf_qk
It was the first time that Hakimullah, who was in hiding at that time, had publicly criticized Qazi in a special audio message and questioned his stance. Hakimullah’s anti-Qazi stance was somewhat unusual in the sense that he had never publicly criticized any religious leader and that too through a special audio message.In his message which was mostly in Pashto and made and distributed by the Umer Media on April 20, 2012, Hakimullah had quoted from the Holy Quran to substantiate his case against the Qazi. Citing a Geo TV interview with Qazi Hussain which was conducted in April 2012, the TTP chief said the Jamaat leader was totally wrong in his interpretation of the Afghan Taliban’s resistance in Afghanistan as true jehad and that of the TTP in Pakistan as un-Islamic. “Both the Karzai regime in Afghanistan as well as the Pakistan government are allies of the United States. In Afghanistan, the US is occupying Bagram and Jalalabad and other airbases while in Pakistan, the Americans were in control of the Jacobabad airbase. Thus, is there any difference between the fight being waged by the Afghan Taliban and the Pakistani Taliban as both are waging jehad?” Hakimullah Mehsud had asked. While addressing Qazi Hussain, the TTP chief further added in his audio message: “There was a time when educated people, students, ulema and others used to respect you a lot. But I can no longer trust you, Qazi sahib. Why are you calling our battle “fasaad” instead of jehad?” As the media had approached Qazi Hussain to get his reaction, the latter simply refused to comment on Hakimullah’s message, saying. “I know about the existence of this videotape, but I have no comments to make.” (Source: Amir Mir in The News)
In a recent edition of its official magazine “Saada-e-Azeemat”, Deobandi militants of Sipah-e-Sahaba (which also operate as Lashkar-e-Jhangvi or Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat) have criticized Qazi Hussain Ahmed, former chief of Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan, and current chief of Milli Yakjehti Council (Council for National Unity).
Qazi Hussain Ahmed has been criticized due to his pro unity approach between Shias and Sunnis.
The Sipah Sahaba magazine praises late Shabbir Ahmed Usmani Deobandi (a confidante of late Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan) and other Takfiri Deobandi clerics for their anti-Shia stance and cites Salafist-Deobandi sources (Shabbir Usmani, Tahir Hashmi, Safdar Mehmood) to “prove” that Quaid-e-Azam was not a Shia Muslim.
The Takfiri Deobandi magazine uses most despicable language against Shias and Qazi Hussain Ahmed (and also criticizes MQM’s Quaid Altaf Hussain because of his pro-unity stance). Here’s a loose translation:
“how can one who does not even know the basic article of Islam, the Kalma Tayyabah, how can he talk about someone else’s kufr (infidelity)….We consider Shias enemy of Islam and Pakistan. If we sincerely carry on with our mission, one day this anti-Islam sect will run away to Iran. Pakistan’s 90 per cent Muslims consider Shias as non-Muslims and will continue to call them Kafir. We reject … Qazi Hussain Ahmed’s Milli Yakjehti Council which is in fact Shia Yakjehti Council.”
Takfiri Deobandi militants want to kill Qazi Hussain Ahmed and other moderate Sunni leader because of their pro-unity stance between Shia and Sunni. It may be recalled that Qazi Hussain Ahmed is a close friend of Allama Sajid Naqvi of Shia Ulama Council and also opposed when General Musharraf banned the Tahrik Jafria Pakistan (TJP) (later renamed as Tehrik-e-Islami, and then Shia Ulama Council). Qazi Hussain Ahmad said the banned groups had no ties to militants. He noted that the Shia organization is part of the Muttahida Majlis-e Amal, the major opposition alliance of religious parties, which also includes Jamaat Islami. “As far as Tehrik-e Islami is concerned,” said Qazi Hussain Ahmed, “it is a part of MMA, and it is a political organization, it is not a militant organization.”
In the past, Takfiri Deobandi terrorists of Taliban and Sipah-e-Sahaba have killed Maulana Hasan Jan (Deobandi), Dr. Farooq (Deobandi), Maulana Sarfraz Naeemi (Sunni Barelvi), Maulana Turbani (Shia), Maulana Nizamuddin Shamzai (Deobandi) and other moderate Deobandi and Sunni Barelvi scholars because of their Sunni-Shia unity stance and condemnation of suicide bombings by Takfiri Deobandis. Previously Takfiri Deobandis also tried to kill Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehman and Maulana Muhammad Khan Sherani (both are Deobandi clerics of JUI-F) because of their pro Sunni-Shia unity stance. https://lubpak.com/archives/173129
In August 2012, the al Qaeda-linked Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ) released a gruesome video on jihadist internet forums that shows the beheading of two Shiite Muslims abducted form Quetta a few weeks ago. In a statement that accompanied the video on one of the forums, a jihadist said the Sipah Sahaba (banned Pakistani terror group) is part of al Qaeda and the Taliban. The video, titled “Revenge,” was released, first on the Jamia Hafsa Urdu forum and then distributed on other jihadist forums, according to the SITE Intelligence Group, which obtained the video.
Condensed version
In the video, two Shia men (Syed Haseeb Abbas Zaidi and Noor Ali) are filmed for nearly half an hour before they are brought outside and seated on the ground with their hands tied behind their backs. Standing behind them are four masked Deobandi militants of Sipah Sahaba; two are holding a red banner with crossed swords. Two of the Sipah Sahaba fighters then pull out knives, and proceed to behead the two Shia men. The victims’ heads are then placed on their laps. The jihadists then wipe their knives on the clothes of the slain men.
The video is a slap on the face of ISI-touts in Quetta who claim that only Hazara Shias are being killed due to their ethnicity. Both of the Shias killed in this video are non-Hazara Shias of settler (Muhajir and Sindhi) backgrounds. This shows how radicalized anti-Shia Balochs (a tiny minority in majority of peaceful, secular Balochs) are now a part and parcel of Shia genocide. Instead of denying or understating their presence, Baloch tribal leaders, political parties and activists must boldly condemn them and refuse to provide them safe shelter in their areas.
In the latter part, the video also gives strong warning to moderate Sunni traders and scholars including moderate Deobandi scholars Maulana Sherani (JUI) and Hafiz Hamidullah for their reconciliatory and unity stance towards Shias.
Here is why Hafiz Hamdullah was issued with warning by the ISI-sponsored LeJ terrorists:
Suicide attack on Qazi Hussain Ahmed:
Only a few days ago, Takfiri Deobandi militants of Sipah Sahaba tried to kill Qazi Hussain Ahmed (former Chief of Jamaat-e-Islami).
In a video message, Hakeemullah Mehsud very strongly criticized Qazi Hussain because of Qazi’s pro-Sunni-Shia unity stance. Hakimullah described Shias as Kafir (infidel) and declared that Qazi and all others who treat Shias as friends will be treated as Kafir and Wajib-ul-Qatl (worthy to be killed). [Hamid Mir could too falls into that category because of his recent interview with Iranian President and also in view of the fact that he invites Shia Muslim scholars to his TV program Capital Talk and seeks to promote Sunni Shia unity. He too has been attacked by Deobandi militants. https://lubpak.com/archives/231661]
http://youtu.be/bCCnA3qf_qk
In a 10-minute video recording of Mehsud, in which the Taliban leader Hakimullah Mehsud Deobandi termed the Pakistani justice system as “un-Islamic” and claimed that Islamabad was supporting the United States and its policies. Afghanistan’s President Hamid Karzai was also backing the US, he said, adding that jihad inside both countries was therefore justifie “I will never forgive Pakistan and its justice system, as Islamabad has become an ally of the US, like President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan is. The Deobandi Taliban’s jihad against Pakistan will continue,” he said.
“The legal system in Pakistan is secular and decisions made under it are totally un-Islamic; the decision-makers are also infidels. It was Pakistani law that allowed the operations in Lal Masjid and Jamea Hafsa (of Deobandis). In Swat, Muslims who backed the Islamic shariah were either hanged or burnt alive. Even women from Swat are still in the custody of the security forces. The Taliban [ Images ] will never forgive the government,” Mehsud warned. Mehsud also criticised the religious and political parties of Pakistan for their “dubious role”. He especially targeted Qazi Hussain Ahmed, former chief of Jamaat Islami Pakistan, for his close relations with members of the Shia sect — whom Taliban militants consider as non-Muslims and infidels. “Qazi Hussain Ahmed is very close to the Shias; he also participated with them in their prayers. Qazi has called for jihad inside Pakistan as fasad (terrorism) and terms the suicide attacks here un-Islamic,” said Mehsud. In the video, Hakimullah Mehsud asked Qazi Hussain Ahmed, “When the US forces are present in Jacobabad, Jalalabad, Bagram and Baluchistan, how do you not see the difference between jihad and fasad?” The Taliban chief reiterated that waging jihad in Pakistan and Afghanistan was completely justified due to the presence of American forces in both countries. “I know that Qazi Hussain Ahmed is the guardian of Islam and Pakistan but he could not guard masjid and madrasa,” added Mehsud sarcastically.
Taking on Maulana Fazlur Rehman, the head of Jamiat Ulema Islam, Mehsud Deobandi said, “This pious man was staying in London [ Images ] when the Lal Masjid and Jamea Hafsa operations were going on in Islamabad.” Mehsud also called on all Muslims to join the jihad against American forces. “Those who pray to Allah to destroy the Americans should come forward to join the jihad, as only prayers can’t make any difference. Infidel forces have captured the land of Muslims. We need to defeat them or sacrifice our lives on this path,” he said. Source
In spite of TTP’s claim of responsibility, JI’s former chief Qazi Husain Ahmed has blamed the US for the suicide bombing attempt by a female bomber in Mohmand Agency in FATA, the Federally Administered Tribal Area of Pakistan. Pakistan’s newspaper The News reported that Qazi was targeted by the TTP “because of his April 2012 interview wherein he had described the Afghan Taliban’s resistance against the US-led Coalition Forces in Afghanistan as ‘true jehad’ and that of the Pakistani Taliban in Pakistan as ‘un-Islamic’ “. In a video released earlier by the TTP, its chief Hakimullah Mehsud criticized Qazi Husain Ahmed for making alliances with Shia leaders. And then he said to Qazi Husain Ahmed: “There was a time when educated people, students, ulema and others used to respect you a lot. But I can no longer trust you, Qazi sahib. Why are you calling our battle “fasaad” instead of jehad?” These latest assassination attempts are a clear indication of the fact that the Taliban have now turned into Frankenstein monsters bent upon destroying the very people who have created or fostered them for decades. While Qazi Husain publicly insists on blaming the Americans, he and other Islamists must be very worried in private because these latest episodes point to a deep divide within their ranks. Both moderates and radicals among Islamists share a fairly common base of support. But a growing chasm among them has manifested itself across the Islamic world for sometime with the radical Salafists and Deobandis challenging the more moderate and pragmatic Islamists in Egypt, Gaza, Libya, Tunisia, Pakistan and elsewhere. As the Islamists in Pakistan face this deepening crisis in their ranks and feel threatened by the extremists, there is a window of opportunity for mainstream politicians to forge a new national consensus with the moderate Islamists to deal with the militant Taliban (Takfiri Deobandi) threat. What is needed is a two-pronged strategy combining peaceful persuasion and judicious use of force as follows: 1. A broad-based national campaign to educate the people about the serious threat posed by the Taliban militants and various sectarian outfits which are ripping the nation apart. Such a campaign requires broad support by the national media as well as all the political parties which believe in Pakistan’s constitution, democratic institutions and political process. 2. Use national consensus to back selective use of military force in FATA and elsewhere to quell militants who refuse to lay down their weapons. Here’s a video discussion of the subject, however, the discussants do not take into account Pakistan army’s ongoing links with and support Deobandi Jihadist militants: (Source)
http://youtu.be/CKAUD7goQsk
Appendix: Jamaat Islami’s leader Liaquat Baloch highlights that enemies of Pakistan want to ignite Shia-Sunni sectarianism in order damage both Islam and Pakitan.
اسلام ٹائمز: آپ کی جماعت قاضی حسین احمد صاحب کی صورت میں ملی یکجہتی کونسل کی سربراہی کر رہی ہے، یہ اتحاد ملی یکجہتی کیلئے اب تک کیا کردار ادا کرسکا ہے اور قوم مستقبل میں کس حد تک توقعات وابستہ کر سکتی ہے۔؟
لیاقت بلوچ: ابھی تو ابتداء ہے ناں جی۔ جو شدید اختلافات اور نفرتیں، جن کو بڑی قوت سے تیار کیا گیا ہے، ان کو ختم کرنے میں کچھ وقت تو لگے گا اور انشاءاللہ ملی یکجہتی کونسل کا قیام نیک شگون ثابت ہوگا، اور یہ اپنے مقاصد میں کامیاب ہو گی۔
اسلام ٹائمز: پاکستان میں تمام مکاتب فکر کے پیروکار ہمیشہ سے باہمی بھائی چارے سے رہتے آئے ہیں، موجودہ دور میں فرقہ واریت پیدا کرنے کی کوشش کون کر رہا ہے۔؟
لیاقت بلوچ: اس حوالے سے زیادہ شدت ایران کے انقلاب کے بعد پیدا ہوئی کہ جب امریکہ وہاں ناکام ہوگیا تو اس نے مسلم ممالک میں خوف پیدا کیا کہ شیعہ انقلاب آرہا ہے اور سنیوں کو بھڑکایا، اب وہ آگ بھڑکی ہوئی ہے اور اس میں ہم سب بھسم ہو رہے ہیں، ہمیں یہ سمجھنا چاہئے کہ اہل تشیع کے عقائد اور ان کی بنیادیں کوئی نئی نہیں، وہ تو پہلے سے موجود ہیں، اسی طرح اہل سنت کی بھی عقائد کی مضبوط بنیادیں پہلے سے ہی موجود ہیں، ہمارے اکابرین، علماء اور اساتذہ نے اس اختلاف کو ایک دائرے میں رکھا، جس دن یہ شعور پیدا ہوگیا تو دشمن اپنے مقاصد میں ناکام ہو جائے گا۔
اسلام ٹائمز: کیا آپ سمجھتے ہیں کہ اس خطے کے اہم ممالک ایک بلاک بنا کر خطہ سے امریکی مداخلت کا خاتمہ کرسکتے ہیں۔؟
لیاقت بلوچ: دیکھیں۔ یہ تو ناگزیر ہے، امریکہ جو اس خطہ میں روس، افغانستان، ایران، سینٹرل ایشیاء اور چین کیلئے خطرہ ہے، وہ تمام ممالک جنہیں امریکہ کی اس حکمت عملی سے خطرات ہیں انہیں اکٹھا ہونا پڑے گا۔
http://islamtimes.org/vdcfvcdyxw6d10a.k-iw.html
A relevant passage from Brown Pundits
If you watch Hakeemullah Mehsud’s latest video specifically addressing Qazi Hussain Ahmed, you’ve a blueprint ready for what is unfolding in Pakistan. The bad Taliban’s leader has narrowed his focus now to his easily achievable and unimportant targets: Shia. This is after all a target which the army can afford to remain unconcerned about.
The Taliban are a problem when they target indiscriminately or discriminately when security installations are targeted. The media will bemoan and condemn the Taliban’s anti-military and anti-Pakistani targets, but it will act ignorant or unaffected when Shias are targeted. See how it started operations in Bajaur, Orakzai, South Waziristan and Swat when military and common masses were the Taliban target. General Kiyani would make no qualms to issue statement in personal capacity. But in a fight that the Taliban have waged against Shias, neither media nor army will bother to rise up. They have no reason to since they probably are all for it.
That is what the Taliban have lately done. The pre-Moharram preparations, and the activities in Moharram’s first 10-days, were focused on Shias. While ‘terrorists’ were condemned, and ‘innocents’ killing was bemoaned, the media, out of sheer fear or caution did not name the Taliban, trying to continue the same narrative that is conspiratorial: America, India, Israel nexus; and “Muslims” cannot do such things.
Coming to Hakeemullah’s video: while security forces were occasionally lambasted in the video, Qazi’s being with Shias was an unpardonable crime. Thus Qazi or any Pakistani if they want their safety and Muslimhood intact, should never be seen with Shias again. This is the first step of apostatizing the Shias, paving the way for societal and ultimately constitutional apostazation of Shias. Steps in this regard have already been taken. Malik Ishaq released and now ASWJ’s vice president. Refer to the news item in ET which said Muslim League Nawaz has already reached an understanding for alliance, allowing the ASWJ in at least 12 constituencies to field its winnable candidates and no political resistance will be put. Ludhyawni’s recent appearance on TV where he made some ridiculous remarks were then endorsed by the Taliban, saying they had a fight of belief with the Shias. Thus on both military and political front, a plan for mass alienation coupled with annihilation is being executed.
by Ammar on Brown Pundits
It is now very very clear that Takfiri Deobandi militants of Sipah Sahaba and Taliban are real enemies of Pakistan.
Omar Deobandi (the master mind of attack on Qazi) is a senior deputy of Hakimullah and is considered one of the most effective and powerful Taliban leaders in the tribal areas. He maintains close ties to al-Qaeda and is believed to have given sanctuary to Dr Ayman al Zawahiri in the past.
Omar Khalid is also allied with Commander Qari Zia Rahman, the dual-hat Taliban and al-Qaeda leader who operates in tribal agencies of Mohmand and Bajaur as well as in Afghanistan’s provinces of Kunar and Nuristan which are currently being used by the Malala-fame Mullah Fazlullah to carry out cross-border ambushes against Pakistani security forces.
Qari Zia runs several male and female suicide training camps in remote areas of north western Pakistan and north eastern Afghanistan. Zia’s private army has fighters from Pakistan, Chechnya, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan and several Arab countries. He commands a brigade in al-Qaeda’s paramilitary Shadow Army, which is called the Lashkar-e-Zil (LeZ), previously led by Commander Ilyas Kashmiri, who was killed in a US drone strike in July 2011.
http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-13-18961-Is-TTPs-Omar-Khalid-behind-attack-on-Qazi
Woman suicide bomber attacks Qazi Hussain Ahmed – 11-19-2012, 08:50 PM
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2012%5C11%5C20%5Cstory_20-11-2012_pg1_3
PESHAWAR: A woman suicide bomber targeted former chief of the Jamaat-e-Islami, Qazi Hussain Ahmed, near the Afghan border on Monday, wounding at least four local party workers, officials said.
Ahmed escaped unscathed after the attack in Mohmand.
Mohmand is one of seven districts in the country’s semi-autonomous tribal belt, where Taliban and al Qaeda-linked terrorists have carved out strongholds.
Local administrative official Adil Siddique told AFP Ahmed had been en route to address a public meeting in the Haleemzai area when the woman blew herself up on foot alongside his convoy.
Ahmed’s vehicle was not damaged or hit by the force of the blast, which wounded four local members of the Jamaat-e-Islami, Siddique said. Another local official, Jamshed Khan, confirmed the incident and said “pieces of female clothes and hair found from the site make us believe that the attacker was a woman”.
Meanwhile, Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf condemned the terrorist attack on Qazi Hussain Ahmed, and telephoned him to inquire about the incident. The PM also expressed best wishes for Ahmed’s health and welfare. afp/staff report
Beware the Salafi Man, for he is the Devil’s pawn. Alone among God’s primates, he kills for sport or lust or greed. Yea, he will murder his brother to possess his brother’s land. Let him not breed in great numbers, for he will make a desert of his home and yours. Shun him; drive him back into his jungle lair, for he is the harbinger of death.
US attacks Qazi: a preposterous allegation — Syed Kamran Hashmi
Qazi Hussain Ahmed was threatened by radicals after an interview in which he had criticised the violent policies of the Pakistani Taliban
A hospital stretcher was probably being pushed to the operation theatre for an emergency craniotomy on a 15-year-old girl who was shot in the head by the Taliban three days ago. We had held onto our prayers longer, with hearts heart beating faster, pleading very hard to the Almighty God for her safe recovery. Qazi Hussain Ahmed, the former Ameer of Jamaat-e-Islami (JI), regrettably, but not surprisingly, had confused the issue, more than ever, by only condemning the attack without denouncing the perpetrator. What a shame. Keeping his guards up against any provocation to the extremists, he had proclaimed, “A 14-year-old child is neither entirely aware of her circumstances, nor can she be fully committed to a cause. At this young age, there must be someone else behind the scenes exploiting her innocence, and whoever has manipulated her is equally guilty of the crime as her shooter.”
To make further inroads with the Taliban, Qazi Hussain Ahmed narrated the story about her father and touched upon the condemnable role of the international news agencies in taking advantage of the innocence of Malala Yousafzai. “When she was 11 years old, the ground situation in Mingora, Swat was really bad, almost like a curfew. During that time, a BBC representative stayed in her house for three days as a guest of her father, in which he had a chance to converse with her in detail,” he said. “The video tapes of that interview are available and can be provided to the media upon demand. After that discussion with the BBC representative, she was introduced to the Pakistani NGOs and groomed for a ‘special purpose’.”
Decoding that ‘special purpose’ is not complicated at all. For ordinary citizens, it can be easily translated to reduce extremism in Pakistan where religious intolerance has been escalating at an alarming pace since 9/11, and has seriously endangered the peaceful existence of the whole society. But in the eyes of the JI, such a motive is only called secularism and has to be opposed vehemently. Qazi also pointed out that after the attack on Malala, the hidden agenda of the Pakistani spy agencies and the army to launch a military operation in North Waziristan (NW) was not obscure any more, and his party would not favour any assault against the Taliban in that area upon the demand of the Americans. Even though in the eyes of many experts, an army operation in NW is inevitable; and can presumably help reduce violence in the country at least to some extent, but the JI has decided to resist it in any case, as it has decided to object to any action that can promote the (self-defined) secular ideology.
But we do not want to get involved in this contentious debate at the moment because of the paucity of real data; instead what we want to examine, although briefly, is the concepts of the JI behind their jihad policy. Once we get a grasp on their policy inspirations, we can then easily understand their next strategy, and it would not surprise us anymore. To summarise, their theory has always been to stay safe and be involved in active jihad at the same time. It can be described further as: choose your enemy carefully that cannot, even remotely, harm you; if you reckon someone can harm you, then do not make him/her your enemy. (This policy does not apply to the Muttahida Qaumi Movement because they snatched the home ground of Karachi from the JI and caused them electoral homelessness.)
Following that simple rule, Qazi has attempted to appease the extremists after being attacked by the Pakistani Taliban, who have now proved their virility not only to the JI but also to all the religious political parties of Pakistan. To ensure further his safety, he has also nominated the US as his personal enemy, completely ignoring the fact that just a few years ago, even after 9/11, he used to publicly admire the US for its pluralism (obviously stemming out of its secular constitution) during his visits to the US. He had happily sent his son to the US for higher education without being concerned about his safety, secure in the knowledge that there was no imminent threat to him or his family from the world’s biggest power.
The sad truth is different. We all know that Qazi was threatened by radicals after an interview in which he had criticised the violent policies of the Pakistani Taliban. The Taliban had later issued their rebuttal with a warning of a forthcoming attack on the former Ameer. In that situation, rather than taking the bull by the horns and realising it was time to show courage and resolve, Qazi, a former Senator, has regrettably tried hard to mend his ties with the extremists. Using the anti-American public sentiment and deliberately obfuscating the issue, he has consistently condemned the US for everything that has gone wrong in Pakistan, but has not mustered up the courage to go after the real perpetrators of the attempted assassination of both Malala Yousafzai and himself. In that way, he has stuck to the core ideology of his party where perhaps personal safety is the top priority even when the safety of the nation is compromised. What a shame.
The writer is a US-based freelance columnist and can be reached at skamranhashmi@gmail.com
Source: Daily Times
Who attacked Qazi?
Posted: November 30, 2012 in Published in, The Friday Times
by Zia Ur Rehman
Nov 23-29, 2012
http://www.thefridaytimes.com/beta3/tft/article.php?issue=20121123&page=2
On October 19, former Jamaat-e-Islami chief Qazi Hussain Ahmed narrowly escaped a suicide attack in Gandau area of Mohmand Agency. A burqa-clad woman blew herself up near his convoy injuring five.
Qazi’s procession was headed to the Mian Mandi area of Haleemzai tehsil to address a gathering and open a party office when it came under attack near Ghyiba Chowk, according to Adil Siddique, the political agent. According to a witness, a woman sitting on the roadside detonated the explosives strapped to her body when the convoy arrived. Officials found pieces of female clothing and hair on the site.
The event was not postponed despite the suicide attack. Qazi told reporters later that he had been attacked by “the agents of the US, Israel and India”, and not by Muslims.
Although nobody has claimed responsibility for the bombing, Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan chief Hakeemullah Mehsud had released a video several months ago in which he had denounced Qazi and questioned his stance on TTP attacks in Pakistan. In the Pashto video made and released by Umer Media, Mehsud cites an April 2012 interview by Salim Safi on Geo TV. He criticized Qazi for saying that the Afghan Taliban’s resistance against foreign forces was true jihad and that of the Pakistani Taliban against Pakistan was un-Islamic. Hakimullah argued that the JI leader was wrong.
Qazi had refused to respond to the video. “I know about the existence of this videotape, but I have no comments to make,” he told reporters.
Militants operating in Mohmand Agency are led by Omar Khalid, whose real name is Abdul Wali. A source in the police said the Mohmand chapter of TTP was involved in most of the recent attacks on political leaders in the neighboring Charsadda and Peshawar districts.
On November 11, a bomb planted near the house of Jamaat-e-Islami Peshawar chief and former lawmaker Sabir Hussain Awan went off, damaging a nearby house and a mosque.
Last year, police defused a bomb planted near the house of another JI leader, Shabbir Ahmad Khan. At least 27 people including JI Peshawar vice chief Haji Dost Muhammad and a deputy superintendent of police were killed in a suicide attack in Qissa Khwani Bazar of Peshawar in April 2010.
Fazlur Rehman, chief of Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl, survived two successive suicide attacks in Swabi and Charsadda in March 2011.
Several activists and leaders of the JUI-F have been targeted and killed in Khyber Pakhtunkwa and FATA in the last four years. Those who died include Mairajuddin, a former MNA from the Mehsud area of South Waziristan, Noor Muhammad Wazir, a former MNA from the Wazir area of South Waziristan, and Haji Afzal Khan, former district mayor of Hangu.
These attacks are significant because JUI-F and JI are considered pro-Taliban. Some political analysts believe the attacks indicate a growing ideological divide between the religious political parties and Pakistani Taliban concerning the legitimacy of the Pakistani state.
The TTP openly denounces democracy and calls the state un-Islamic. The religious parties participate in elections and recognize the authority of the Pakistani state.
The March 2011 assassination attempts on Fazlur Rehman came days after leaked US State Department cables revealed JUI-F leaders reportedly wanted to mediate between the US and the Afghan Taliban. Analysts say the Afghan Taliban and Al Qaeda decided to sever links with the JUI-F after that.
Serious differences had also been reported between Jamaat-e-Islami and Tehrik-e-Nifaz-e-Shariat-e-Mohammadi led by Sufi Mohammad and his son-in-law Fazlullah. Sufi was a local leader of the JI in Dir district until the early 1980s, when he parted ways with them and violated their policy of getting power only through elections
Qazi says US ‘ultimate beneficiary’ of attack on him
By Our CorrespondentPublished: November 21, 2012
Former chief of Jamaat-e-Islami Qazi Hussain Ahmed talking to the media in Islamabad. PHOTO: SANA
ISLAMABAD:
A day after he survived a targeted suicide attack, former chief of Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) Qazi Hussain Ahmed on Tuesday reiterated that America was the “ultimate beneficiary” of such an assault.
“They always want me to condemn the Taliban. This way, they must have thought that I would blame the Taliban and thus, condemn them,” Qazi told The Express Tribune, when asked who he thought would benefit from an attack on his life.
Qazi spoke to The Express Tribune after a press conference held to announce that JI and other religious parties would observe a black day on Friday, November 23, against Israel’s aggression in Gaza.
Referring to the suicide attack on his life in Mohmand Agency, where he was scheduled to address supporters, Hussain said it was the result of a conspiracy by the US who wanted “us (Pakistanis) to fight each other.”
“The plan of the Americans was that I would put the blame of the suicide attack on the Taliban and condemn them, to which they would react and the fight between us would go on,” said Qazi, adding that “the US would be the ultimate beneficiary.”
When asked why he would not condemn the Taliban for killing people in terrorist attacks, Qazi chose to be diplomatic: “I will not specifically name anyone, but I have always condemned and will condemn anyone who kills innocent people.”
He said he had received no threats before the attack and that no terrorist group had claimed responsibility for it yet.
Qazi reiterated how the attack did not deter him from addressing the scheduled congregation and thanked his supporters and party activists for being concerned about his well-being.
Divulging details of the attack, Qazi added: “The political agent of the area told me the bomber was a female in a burqa. My driver also spotted a burqa-clad figure running towards our vehicle before it blew up near the one behind ours. Some young party workers got hurt.”
He added the government’s security personnel opened fire in panic, which was not necessary. He said the rulers of this country must sever ties with the US as it was “pitching us (Pakistanis) against each other.”
Qazi also said he would not support a military operation in North Waziristan, said to be the bastion of the Taliban.
Lamenting over the death of innocent Palestinians, Qazi said the US supported Israel’s atrocities in Gaza. “The Muslim world should move beyond lip service to help end the killing of Palestinians. The Organisation of Islamic Countries should be used as an effective platform towards achieving this.”
He urged clerics to highlight the suffering of Palestinians in their Friday sermons.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 21st, 2012.
http://tribune.com.pk/story/469046/qazi-says-us-ultimate-beneficiary-of-attack-on-him/
Reader Comments (8)
ALL COMMENTSREADER’S RECOMMENDATIONS
Raj – USA
Nov 21, 2012 – 11:05AM
Reply
“They always want me to condemn the Taliban. This way, they must have thought that I would blame the Taliban and thus, condemn them,” Qazi told The Express Tribune, when asked who he thought would benefit from an attack on his life.”
“When asked why he would not condemn the Taliban for killing people in terrorist attacks, Qazi chose to be diplomatic: “I will not specifically name anyone, but I have always condemned and will condemn anyone who kills innocent people.”
Read together, this means that either:
(1) Talibans should not be condemned for the suicide attack Or
(2) Qazi does not fall under the category of innocent people who are killed by the Talibans.
Recommend6
Ali
Nov 21, 2012 – 11:06AM
Reply
He is right. The lady who blew herself up was a white woman.
Recommend4
Karim
Nov 21, 2012 – 11:11AM
Reply
Who is the ultimate beneficiary is another discussion. Qazi Sahib please be realistic and understand the ground realities.
Recommend8
A J Khan
Nov 21, 2012 – 11:13AM
Reply
Truth is a casualty .
Recommend3
Khalid Pathan
Nov 21, 2012 – 11:36AM
Reply
I fail to see that how the USA going to benefit if Qazi Hussain Ahmad is killed. Even when Qazi was leading Jammat e Islami, he was no threat to the interests of West. His only contribution is opposing Agha Khan Education Board from Conducting the O & A level exams., Qazi won and the poor of this country lost all hopes of progress through better education.
Recommend5
Ali Zaid
Nov 21, 2012 – 11:58AM
Reply
haha Qazi sahab I really wonder why USA would feel threaten of you? Have you said a “no” to US or what? or may be one of your US-national sons have committed some crime in US?
You were/are the sole beneficiary of all the US schemes/plots against Pakistan during Afghan war and offcourse the current sectarian violence.
Recommend7
khan
Nov 21, 2012 – 11:59AM
Reply
to me it look like the other way around.. jumate islami seems to be the biggest beneficiary of this attack…and what kind of an attack was that … I think 1/4 kg of blastic material was used. it was a joke in the name of suicide blast…
Recommend4
Something Clever
Nov 21, 2012 – 2:08PM
Reply
Time to put him in an old folks home. He obviously has dementia.
I am a Shia Muslim and I respect Qazi sahib because of his sincere efforts to forge unity between Sunni and Shia. Shame on Takfiris who wanted to kill him.
New alliance with no political ambitions emerges
By: Ashraf Mumtaz | May 20, 2012 . 0
LAHORE – A broad-based non-political alliance of religio-political parties is expected to be launched on Monday (tomorrow) when former Jamaat-i-Islami amir Qazi Hussain Ahmed, duly mandated by his party, hosts a conference at a five-star hotel in Islamabad.Leaders of parties representing all religious schools of thought will be among the participants.The new coalition will try to settle differences among religious parties with a view to uniting them at a time when the country faces a number of threats from the powers occupying Afghanistan for the last one decade. At a later stage, the forum will also try to remove all hurdles in unity among the Islamic countries.The leadership understands that it is going to be a daunting task, but they are determined to achieve the target at any cost. Settlement of Shia-Sunni differences will be on top of the agenda, and the participants will devise a strategy for the purpose.To ensure that the proceedings of the day-long conference go on smoothly, the organisers have decided to invite Sipahe Sahaba Pakistan (a Sunni organisation) and Millat-i-Jafaria (representing Shias) in separate sessions. In Monday’s session, the Shia leaders will be there, but the SSP representatives will be invited to some other session.A committee is expected to be formed to find commonalities between Shias and Sunnis and persuade them to work together. The proposed alliance will also carry out a number of other tasks.For example, for the first time in the country’s history, an attempt would be made that sermons to be delivered in Juma prayers from all mosques are on the same subject.To make it possible, a committee is likely to be constituted by the conference participants. The recommendations made by the Council of Islamic Ideology on a variety of subjects remain unimplemented.The proposed alliance would also consider a methodology to force the government to enact legislation in the light of those recommendations.Qazi Hussain Ahmed said that the new alliance would ‘not’ be an election alliance and it would work only on a non-political agenda. He said the new alliance would not oppose efforts to revive the Muttahida Majlis-i-Aml (MMA). This alliance remained active for several years, but went into the background after the 2008 elections, mainly on account of differences between the JUI-F and the Jamaat-i-Islami leaders.The former JI Amir said the new alliance would have no differences with the Defence of Pakistan Council, a conglomerate opposed to the government’s plans to restore the NATO supplies to Afghanistan.Answering a question, Qazi Hussain Ahmed said the new body would have an organisational structure and a general council would run it.Those who will participate in Monday’s session include: Maulana Fazlur Rahman (JUI-F), Hafiz Muhammad Saeed (Jamaatud Dawa), Allama Sajid Ali Naqvi (Millat-i-Jafria), Maulana Samiul Haq (JUI-S), Syed Munawar Hasan (Jamaat-i-Islami), Awais Noorani and Sahibzada Abul Khair (JUP), Alama Muhammad Amin Shaheedi (Wahdat-e-Muslimeen), Sahibzada Fazal Karim (Sunni Council), Sahibzada Sultan Ahmad Ali (Tanzimul Arifeen), Hafiz Akif Saeed (Tanzim-i-Islami), Qari Hanif Jallundri (Wifaqul Madaris), Pir Haroon Gilani (Tehrik-i-Faizan Aulia), Mufti Muneebur Rahman (Chairman Ruet-i-Hilal Committee), Maulana Abdul Malik (Ittehadul Ulema), Allama Ibtesam Elahi Zaheer (Jamiat Ahle-Hadith) and Professor Sajid Mir (Markazi Ahle Hadith).
http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/national/20-May-2012/new-alliance-with-no-political-ambitions-emerges
Why Sunni and Shia Unity?
http://www.sunniandshia.com/
Qazi Sahib’s article in support of Shia Sunni Islamic unity
http://www.sunniandshia.com/qazi-hussain-ahmed-on-muslim-unity-in-pakistan-2012/
Islamist political parties in the Taliban’s crosshairs
While the Jamaat-e-Islami is an Islamist political party that supports the Taliban and advocates the imposition of sharia, or Islamic law, the Taliban have targeted the party’s leaders in at least two other suicide attacks in the past.
On April 19, 2010, a suicide bomber attacked a Jamaat-e-Islami political rally in Peshawar, killing 23 people.
And at the end of March 2011, the Taliban twice tried to kill Maulana Fazlur Rehman, the leader of the pro-Taliban Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam Fazl political party. On March 30, a suicide bomber targeted Rehman in Swabi, killing 10 people. On March 31, 12 people were killed in the northwestern district of Charsadda in a roadside bomb attack against Rehman’s convoy.
The Taliban have been critical of Pakistani Islamist political parties for working with and participating in the Pakistani government, for seeking political power through elections, and for failing to put up armed opposition to Pakistani military operations against the Taliban and US drone strikes against al Qaeda in the tribal areas. According to Dawn, Pakistani Taliban emir Hakeemullah Mehsud recently criticized Qazi Hussain for supporting the Pakistani government.
Suicide attacks by female bombers in Afghanistan and Pakistan:
Nov. 19, 2012
Mohmand, Pakistan
A female suicide bomber wounded four people in an attack on Qazi Hussain Ahmed, the former emir of the Jamaat-e-Islami.
Sept. 18, 2012
Kabul, Afghanistan
Hizb-i-Islami Gulbuddin claimed credit for a suicide attack in Kabul that targeted foreigners and was executed by a female. At least 12 people, mostly foreign workers, were killed in the attack.
Aug. 11, 2011
Peshawar, Pakistan
A female suicide bomber killed an elderly woman while attempting to attack a police outpost in Peshawar.
June 26, 2011
Uruzgan, Afghanistan
The Taliban gave an eight-year-old girl a bag of explosives and had her walk to a police outpost in the Cino Charo district. The explosives detonated before she reached the police, killing only the girl.
June 25, 2011
Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan
A husband and wife team, said to be Uzbeks, attacked a police station in the town of Kolachi. The team entered the town’s police station under the guise of filing a complaint and took several policemen hostage. The pair detonated their vests as police laid siege to the station, killing seven policemen and a tea boy. The Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan claimed the attack, and said it was carried out to avenge the death of al Qaeda founder and former leader Osama bin Laden.
June 4, 2011
Kunar, Afghanistan
The Taliban claimed credit for a female suicide attack in the Marawara district that killed three interpreters. The Taliban released an official statement on their propaganda website, Voice of Jihad, and claimed that a “Mujahida sister” killed 12 US and Afghan troops.
Dec. 24, 2010
Bajaur, Pakistan
A female suicide bomber killed 42 Pakistani civilians in an attack at a World Food Program ration distribution point in Khar, Bajaur.
June 21, 2010
Kunar, Afghanistan
A female suicide bomber struck for the first time in Afghanistan in Kunar province. In the attack, two US soldiers were killed and two Afghan children were wounded. Qari Zia Rahman claimed credit for the suicide attack.
Also a female suicide attack in a Shia mjlis in Bhakkar killed dozens of Shia women a few years ago.
Hakeemullah Mehsud declaring Qazi Hussain Ahmed Apostate and Heretic (Kafir and Murtid)
Hakeemullah Mehsud, Chief of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan declaring Qazi Hussain Ahmed, the former Chief of Jamat-e-Islami Pakistan heretic and apostate (Kafir and Murtid) because he offers prayers behind Shia Muslims (which is a heretic school of thought in the eyes of TTP) and the opposition of later to TTP terrorist activities inside Pakistan.
http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=10151600816923504
Hakimullah Mahsud criticises Qazi Hussain for ‘misinterpreting’ Jihad
Rahimullah Yusufzai
Friday, April 20, 2012
From Print Edition
109 26 11 0
PESHAWAR: Qazi Hussain Ahmad declined to comment on a new videotape recorded by the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) head Hakimullah Mahsud in which he accused the former Jamaat-i-Islami chief of distorting the concept of jihad and defending Pakistan instead of Islam.
“I know about the existence of this videotape, but I have no comment to make,” Qazi Hussain Ahmad said when asked if he wanted to say something on the subject.
It was the first time that Hakimullah, who is in hiding, publicly criticized Qazi Hussain and questioned his stance on the issue of TTP attacks in Pakistan. However, he didn’t threaten the JI leader. Rather, he appeared to be complaining as to why Qazi Hussain had adopted such a stand.
Hakimullah hasn’t been issuing videotapes or interacting with the media for quite sometime now. As he is one of the most wanted men in the country and has been attacked by the US drones and has survived military operations by Pakistan’s security forces, he has become extra careful in his activities and movement.
However, the emergence of his recent videotape surprised his friends and foes as it mostly focused on Qazi Hussain. It is in Pashto, though he utters a few sentences in Urdu also and quotes from the holy Quran to substantiate his arguments. The videotape was made and distributed by Umer Media.
Hakimullah cites an interview that Salim Safi conducted with Qazi Hussain on the Geo TV to build his case against the former JI head.
Criticizing Qazi Hussain for describing the Afghan Taliban’s resistance against foreign forces in Afghanistan as true jihad and that of the Pakistani Taliban in Pakistan as un-Islamic, Hakimullah argued that the JI leader was wrong in his interpretation.
“Both the Karzai regime in Afghanistan and the Pakistan government are allies of the US. In Afghanistan, the US is occupying Bagram and Jalalabad and other airbases and in Pakistan the Americans were in control of Jacobabad airbase. Where is the difference between the fight being waged by the Afghan Taliban and the Pakistani Taliban as both are waging jihad?” he asked.
Hakimullah reminded Qazi Hussain that he was once given respect by educated people, students, Ulema and others. “Now I can no longer trust you, Qazi sahib. Why are you calling our battle “fasaad” instead of jihad? You are secular and “watanprast” because you are seeking power and defending Pakistan instead of Islam!” he stressed.
The TTP leader also objected to Qazi Hussain’s decision to form an alliance with Shias in Pakistan and praying after a Shia prayer leader.
He also claimed that un-Islamic laws were in force in Pakistan. Alleging that those demanding Shariah in Swat were tortured and put to death, Hakimullah declared that he would never forgive the government for committing excesses against students at Lal Masjid and Jamia Hafsa.
The long-haired Hakimullah, looking healthy, ended his videotape by reciting a popular couplet of famous Pashto warrior-poet Khushal Khan Khattak in which he said that warriors had no other wish in life but to sacrifice their lives or emerge victorious.
http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-13-14045-Hakimullah-Mahsud-criticises-Qazi-Hussain-for-misinterpreting-Jihad
پاکستان میں فرقہ واریت، علما کانفرنس طلب کر لی گئی
آخری وقت اشاعت: ہفتہ 19 مئ 2012 , 15:26 GMT 20:26 PST
Facebook
Twitter
دوست کو بھیجیں
پرنٹ کریں
’ہماری کوشش کا مقصد اسلام کو ٹھیک طریقے سے سمجھنا اور اس کا فہم پیدا کرنا ہے‘
جماعت اسلامی کے سابق امیر قاضی حسین احمد نے ملک میں فرقہ وارانہ فسادات کی روک تھام کے لیے آسلام آباد میں بین الفقہی اجلاس طلب کیا ہے۔ اس اجلاس میں انہیں جماعت اسلامی کی تائید بھی حاصل ہے۔
قاضی حسین احمد نے سنیچر کو بی بی سی اردو سروس سے بات کرتے ہوئے بتایا کہ اجلاس کے چار نکات ہیں جن میں باہمی اختلافات کو بات چیت کے ذریعے حل کرنا، خطبات جمعہ میں ہم آہنگی اور ان میں علمی گہرائی پیدا کرنا، اسلامی نظریاتی کونسل کی متفقہ طور پر منظور شدہ سفارشات کو نافذ کرنا اور آخر میں مختلف فقہ کے لوگوں کو قریب لانا اور ایسا ماحول پیدا کرنا کہ وہ اختلافات کو نظر انداز کریں اور ’مشترکات‘ پر زور دیں۔
اسی بارے میں
گلگت: اڑتالیس گھنٹے بعد کرفیو میں نرمی
فرقہ وارانہ ہلاکتوں پر ایچ آر سی پی کی تشویش
کراچی:’فرقہ وارانہ کشیدگی میں اضافہ‘
متعلقہ عنوانات
پاکستان, جماعتِ اسلامی
انہوں نے ایسی کمیٹی کا قیام بھی تجویز کیا ہے جو جمعہ کے خطبوں کے لیے مشترکہ نکات طے کرنے کے ساتھ ساتھ خطیبوں کی رہنمائی کر سکے۔
کلِک قاضی حسین احمد کا انٹرویو
اس سوال کے جواب میں کہ اس طرح کا کام تو چودہ سو سال میں نہیں ہو سکا وہ کیسے کر لیں گے قاضی حسین احمد نے جواب دیا کہ ایسی کوششیں جب مسلسل جاری رہیں گی تو تفرقہ ڈالنے والی قوتیں کمزور ہوتی ہیں اور کشیدگیاں بھی کم ہوتی۔
اس سوال پر کہ پاکستان میں اصل تشدد تو فرقہ وارنہ بنیادوں پر ہو رہا ہے اس سے کیسے نمٹا جا سکتا ہے؟ قاضی حسین احمد نے جواب دیا کہ تشدد تو فرقہ وارانہ بنیادوں کے علاوہ نسلی اور لسانی بنیادوں پھر بھی ہو رہا ہے۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ ان کی کوشش ہے کہ تمام اسلامی قوتوں اور مسلمانوں کو ان بنیادوں پر اکٹھا کرنا ضروری ہے جو ان میں مشترک ہیں۔
انہوں نے کہا کہ ان کی اس کوشش کا انتخابی سیاست سے تعلق نہیں لیکن یہ اس حد تک سیاسی ضرور ہے کہ معاشرے کی اصلاح کی کوشش کو ہی سیاست کہا جاتا ہے۔
جب ان سے پوچھا گیا کہ پاکستان میں تشدد میں ان تنظیموں کا بالواسطہ یا بلا واسطہ ہاتھ نظر آتا ہے جو مبینہ طور پر طالبان یا القاعدہ سے منسلک ہیں، انہوں نے کہا کہ ان کی مجلس میں تمام معروف فقہی مکاتب کے لوگ شامل ہیں جن میں اہلسنت والجماعت کے مختلف طبقے، سلفی اور اہل تشیع کے مختلف گروپ شامل ہیں۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ یہ لوگ ان تمام لوگوں پر اثرانداز ہو سکتے ہیں جو متشدد کارروائیوں میں ملوث ہیں۔
“اسلام تو اعتدال پیدا کرنے والا مذہب ہے اور لوگوں کو قتل اور خونریزی پر آمادہ کرنے والا مذہب نہیں ہے”
اس سوال کے جواب میں کہ پاکستان میں ایک طبقے کی رائے میں مذہبی انتہاپسندی کی سب سے بڑی وجہ اسلام پسندی ہے جبکہ بانی پاکستان محمد علی جناح کی خواہش تو سیکولر پاکستان کا قیام تھا، قاضی حسین احمد نے جواب دیا کہ سیکولر ہندوستان تو موجود تھا اور موجود ہے۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ مسلمانوں کا الگ ملک بنانے مقصد تو سیکولر ملک بنانا نہیں تھا۔
انہوں نے کہا کہ ان کی کوشش اسلام کو ٹھیک طریقے سے سمجھنے کی اور اس کا فہم پیدا کرنے کی کوشش ہے۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ اسلام تو اعتدال پیدا کرنے والا مذہب ہے اور لوگوں کو قتل اور خونریزی پر آمادہ کرنے والا مذہب نہیں ہے
http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/pakistan/2012/05/120519_qazi_sects_a.shtml
قاضی حسین احمد کا انٹرویو
http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/multimedia/2012/05/120519_qazi_interview_a.shtml
Very nice post. I simply stumbled upon your blog and wished to mention that I have really enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. After all I’ll be subscribing on your rss feed and I’m hoping you write again soon!
1st of d starting in d name of ALLAH who id 1 lord of all creation
brailvi shai dio-bandi 3 firka maslak inka na quran se wasta na hadis se na rasool-ALLAH S.A.W se na ALLAH-Pak se
shia ali hussain r.a. ko rab manta hy
dio-bandi k rab abu hanifa or ajkal new born rab Bandar(moch-kapa) Tariq jamil hy
brailvi k rab hazrat kala imam khan shab or new rab dako padre hy
jab ap inko quran hadis se bat bolo ya bonkty hain hamra imam hamara peer molvi ya bekwas karta hy hum ni manty quran hadis ko
phir inka islam s kia connection howa ?
no doubt ye 3 hi terror hain
jo quran k na many rasool sayedna Muhammad s.a.w ko na many hadis ko na many ALLAH ko na many lanat os py
wo mushrik hy
khanzir hy
kutaaa hy
na-pak
na-jis
mardoooooooooood hy
or jhoton p ALLAH k lanat ho
jisko kira zoor se saat mary wo manazra kar ly
honey khan melazai