Don’t insult our dead by electing Pakistan to UN Human Rights Council
Related post: Shia genocide database
Hina Khar tries to hide Shia genocide, paints rosy picture of human rights in Pakistan
While unveiling the country’s national report at the UN’s Human Rights Council (HRC) on Tuesday, the government glossed over bitter facts and painted an overly rosy picture of what cannot be considered an enviable record.
Keen to defend the country’s record because of candidacy for the Nov 12 election to HRC and hopes of qualifying for next GSP+ preferential trade programme, Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar herself led the delegation to the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) in Geneva.
UPR is a state-driven process in which every UN member country gets a chance to make a presentation at the council about steps it had taken to address rights violations and fulfil its obligations. Currently the second round of the review, which started in May this year, is under way. The UPR has been heralded as an unmatched international mechanism to monitor rights situation across the world.
The delegation did take pride in having a vibrant civil society and media and strengthening democracy in the country.
But what the foreign minister either fleetingly addressed or completely ignored – missing persons; blasphemy laws; continued killing of Shias; plight of religious minorities; maltreatment of women; abuses during counter-militancy operations by the military and situation in Balochistan.
The foreign minister spoke about growing extremism and terrorism in the country as a major challenge to national security, attributed it to CIA-sponsored jihad against the Soviet Union, but didn’t have an inspiring story about how the government was addressing the critical issue other than military-run ‘Sabaoon Project’ in Swat.
Hundreds of sectarian killings, mostly belonging to the Shia community, did not merit a mention.
Reuters adds: Pakistan, plagued by Islamists militancy, sectarian violence and frequent disasters that push its people deeper into poverty, told the United Nations it is a democratic and progressive state working to protect human rights.
But Western countries and the normally anti-Western Belarus countered that in Pakistan religious minorities were persecuted, that dissent was often brutally suppressed by the army, and that little was done to tackle human trafficking.
Foreign Minister Khar said that Pakistan “is a democratic, pluralistic and progressive state” aiming to create a fair society based on equality, respect for diversity and justice.
“Today Pakistan is a functional democracy with an elected and sovereign parliament, an independent judiciary, a free media and a vibrant and robust civil society,” she declared.
Some Western countries have already indicated they do not see Pakistan as a suitable candidate – although they accept there is little they can do to head off a clear majority vote for it in the UN General Assembly on Nov 12.
Issues and questions raised by the Working Group included, among others:
Steps to amend the law on blasphemy and to uphold the rights of religious minorities;
The activities (ineffectiveness) of the National Commission for Human Rights;
Recommendations
States participating in the dialogue posed a series of recommendations to Pakistan. These pertained to the following issues, among others:
Taking additional measures to combat all forms violence and discrimination against women and enacting provincial legislation on domestic violence;
Taking additional measures to promote and protect the rights of human rights defenders including setting up a national policy and bringing perpetrators of related attacks to justice and bringing to justice perpetrators of attacks on journalists;
Enhancing efforts to promote and protect the human rights of religious minorities and investigating attacks and violence against religious minorities and holding accountable those responsible for such acts;
Amending the law on blasphemy ensuring it was in line with international law and stepping up efforts to guarantee the freedom of religion and supporting programmes aimed at strengthening religious freedom and tolerance
ADVANCE QUESTIONS TO PAKISTAN ADD.4
NORWAY
• Could you please elaborate on which steps the Government of Pakistan has taken to implement the accepted UPR-recommendations to guarantee freedom of religion in law and practice, religious discrimination, harassment and attacks on minorities and sects? What steps will the Government of Pakistan take in order to remove the discriminating paragraphs in the Constitution against religious minorities like Ahmadiyyas?
• Which steps will the Government of Pakistan take to end the reported attacks and murder of representatives of religious sects and minorities and to investigate and prosecute the perpetrators?
• Which steps is the Government of Pakistan taking to address the reported high numbers of enforced disappearances?
Draft Resolution for the UN Human Rights Council
Situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan
A draft UN Human Rights Council resolution, adopted by dissidents and human rights activists at the 4th Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy, 13 March 2012.
www.genevasummit.org
The Human Rights Council,
Guided by the Charter of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights, and recalling the International Covenants on Human Rights and other
relevant human rights instruments,
Reaffirming that all Member States have an obligation to promote and protect
human rights and fundamental freedoms and the duty to fulfill the obligations they
have undertaken under the various international instruments in this field,
Considering that the promotion of respect for the obligations arising from the
Charter and other instruments and rules of the international law is among the basic
purposes and principles of the United Nations,
Affirming the responsibility of the International community to promote human
rights and ensure respect for international law,
Gravely concerned at the deplorable situation of human rights in Pakistan,
where widespread and fundamental violations of human rights are taking place with
alarming regularity, affecting the weakest populations disproportionately, namely
women, children, and minorities;
1. Expresses grave concern at the volatile security situation in Pakistan
and its implications for the human rights situation, and urges the Government of
Pakistan to improve the security situation while respecting human rights, and to work
with particular urgency to stop extrajudicial killings and the widespread use of
detention without charge, forced evictions, and house demolitions;
2. Calls upon the Government of Pakistan to guarantee the right to
freedom of expression of all its citizens, and to do so in an environment free from
harassment, intimidation, and abuse, including at the hands of the Government of
Pakistan and its agents,
3. Condemns the abduction and torture in September 2010 of journalist
Umar Cheema and the murder of journalists Abdul Hameed Hayatan and Hamid
Ismail following their arrest at a security forces checkpoint near Gwadar city on 25
October 2010;
4. Also calls upon the Government of Pakistan to abide by its obligations
under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which it has been a
party since 23 June 2010, and which guarantees, inter alia, the rights to freedom of
expression and freedom of religion;5. Further calls upon the Government of Pakistan to protect journalists
and human rights defenders from all attacks by armed groups in Pakistan and
expresses grave concern at the violent death of dozens of media workers in recent
years;
6. Demands that the Government of Pakistan launch independent
investigations into widespread allegations of police and army abuses in violation of
basic human rights, particularly with regard to torture and summary executions,
having regard to numerous recent incidents, including that of robbery suspects filmed
being held down and whipped by police in Chiniot city, and that of soldiers executing
a group of men and boys in the Swat Valley;
7. Expresses grave concern at ongoing and routine violence against
religious minorities in Pakistan, including Sufis, Shiites, Ahmadis, and Christians;
8. Calls upon the Government of Pakistan to act with haste to ensure the
safety of all minorities, to investigate and prosecute all cases of harassment,
intimidation, and violence against them, and to prevent further attacks on religious
minorities, such as those of 28 May 2010, which killed 94 people at two Ahmadiyya
mosques in Lahore, the 1 July 2010 suicide bomb attack on the Data Darbar Sufi
shrine in Lahore that killed 42 people, and the 3 September 2010 suicide bomb attack
on a Shi’a gathering in Quetta that killed at least 65 people;
9. Recognizes that Pakistan’s blasphemy laws constitute a clear and
fundamental violation of the right to freedom of religion of all Pakistani citizens;
10. Strongly urges the Government of Pakistan to guarantee the right to
freedom of religion of all its citizens and also urges the Government of Pakistan to
amend blasphemy laws in order to ensure the free exercise of the rights to freedom of
expression and religion;
11. Calls upon the Government of Pakistan to halt all prosecutions under
the blasphemy laws;
12. Strongly condemns the conviction and sentencing to death of Asia
Bibi, a mother of five, for blasphemy, and urges the Government of Pakistan to
commute her sentence and protect opponents of the blasphemy laws, having regard to
the murders of Punjab governor Salmaan Taseer and Christian Minority Affairs
Minister Shahbaz Bhatti, over their opposition to the blasphemy laws;
13. Expresses grave concern at systematic discrimination and widespread
gender-based violence against women and girls in Pakistan, including, but not limited
to, murder, rape, domestic violence, forced marriages, “honor killings”, and acid
attacks, and deplores the fact that the vast majority of cases of such crimes are not
investigated by police and go unpunished;
14. Strongly urges the Government of Pakistan to investigate and
prosecute all cases of discrimination and violence against women and girls and to
bring to an end the culture of impunity that surrounds these crimes;15. Condemns the decision of Pakistan’s Supreme Court to free the five
men convicted of gang-raping Mukhtar Mai, and deplores the message this sends to
thousands of Pakistani women victimized of rape.
پاکستان میں اہلِ تشیعُ کے قتل عام پر تشویش ہے،اقوامِ متحدہ انسانی حقوق کونسل
جنیوا میں اقوامِ متحدہ کے انسانی حقوق کونسل کا اجلاس منعقد ہوا جس میں 48 ممالک میں انسانی حقوق کے حالات کا جائزہ لیا گیا،
اطلاعات کے مطابق اجلاس میں اقوام متحدہ کی انسانی حقوق کونسل کے رُکن ممالک نے پاکستان میں انسانی حقوق کی صورت حال پر بحث کی، بحث کے دوران اقوام متحدہ کی انسانی حقوق کونسل کے رُکن ممالک نے پاکستان میں جاری شیعہ مسلمانوں کے قتل عام اور اس قتل عام کی چھان بین میں مبینہ تساہل پر تشویش کا اظہار کیا۔
نمائندے کے مطابق اجلاس میں وزیرِ خارجہ حنا ربانی کھر نے پاکستان کی نمائندگی کررہی تھی۔ افسوس کے ساتھ کے ساتھ کہنا پڑتا ہے وزیرِ خارجہ حنا ربانی کھر کی طرف سے عالمی برادری کو دیے جانے والے جواب میں پاکستان میں جاری شیعہ مسلمانوں کے قتل کے حوالے سے کچھ نہیں کہا گیا، اپنے جواب میں وزیرِ خارجہ حنا ربانی کھر نے پاکستان میں بسنے والے 4 کڑوڑ پاکستانی شیعہ مسلمانوں کی ترجمانی نا کرسکی بلکہ اُلٹا شیعہ مسلمانوں کے قتل عام کو چھپانے کی ناکام کوشش کی گئی۔
واضع رہے کہ پاکستان میں کئی دہائیوں سے کالعدم سپاہ صحابہ/ لشکر جھنگوی/ تحریک طالبان کے ہاتھوں شیعہ مسلمانوں کا قتل عام جاری ہے۔ پاکستان میں ہر آنے والی حکومت شیعہ مسلمانوں کو تحفظ دینے میں ناکام رہی ہے،
Source:
http://dawn.com/2012/10/31/khar-paints-rosy-picture-of-human-rights-in-pakistan/
http://pakshia.com/ur/shia-killing-pakistan/human-rights-united-nations-about-shia-killing-in-pakistan/
http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/Highlights30October2012am.aspx
http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/PKSession14.aspx
http://www.unwatch.org/atf/cf/%7B6deb65da-be5b-4cae-8056-8bf0bedf4d17%7D/HRC%20-%20PAKISTAN%20DRAFT%20RESOLUTION.PDF
SPECIAL REPORT – Pakistan’s threat within: Shia genocide at the hands of Takfiri Deobandis
By Michael Georgy
GILGIT, Pakistan | Wed Oct 24, 2012
(Reuters) – About 20 men dressed as Pakistani soldiers boarded a bus bound for a Muslim festival outside this mountain town and checked the identification cards of the passengers. They singled out 19 Shi’ites, drew weapons and slaughtered them, most with a bullet to the head.
The shooters weren’t soldiers. They were a hit squad linked to the Sunni Muslim extremist group Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, or LeJ. They had trekked in along a high Himalayan pass that hot August morning to waylay a convoy of pilgrims.
Here and across Pakistan, violent Sunni radicals are on the march against the nation’s Shi’ite minority.
With a few hundred hard-core cadres, the highly secretive LeJ aims to trigger sectarian violence that would pave the way for a Sunni theocracy in U.S.-allied Pakistan, say Pakistan police and intelligence officials. Its immediate goal, they say, is to stoke the intense Sunni-Shi’ite violence that has pushed countries like Iraq close to civil war.
More than 300 Shi’ites have been killed in Pakistan so far this year in sectarian conflict, according to human rights groups. The campaign is gathering pace in rural as well as urban areas such as Karachi, Pakistan’s biggest city. The Shi’ites are a big target, accounting for up to 20 percent of this nation of 180 million.
In January, LeJ claimed responsibility for a homemade bomb that exploded in a crowd of Shi’ites in Punjab province, killing 18 and wounding 30. LeJ’s reach extends beyond Pakistan: Late last year, LeJ claimed responsibility for bombings in Afghanistan that killed 59 people, the worst sectarian attacks since the fall of the Taliban government in 2001.
“No doubt – (LeJ) are the most dangerous group,” said Chaudhry Aslam, a top counter-terrorism police commando based in Karachi, whose house was blown up by the LeJ. “We will fight them until the last drop of blood.”
For an outlawed group accused of fomenting such mayhem, the leader of LeJ is surprisingly easy to find.
Malik Ishaq spent 14 years in jail in connection with dozens of murder and terrorism cases. He was released after the charges could not be proved – partly because of witness intimidation, officials say – and showered with rose petals by hundreds of supporters when he left prison in July 2011.
Although Ishaq is one of Pakistan’s most feared militants, he enjoys the protection of followers clutching AK-47 assault rifles in the narrow lane outside his home. There, in the town of Rahim Yar Khan in southern Punjab province, Reuters visited him for an interview.
“The state should declare Shi’ites as non-Muslims on the basis of their beliefs,” said Ishaq, calling them the “greatest infidels on earth.” Young supporters with shoulder-length hair in imitation of the Prophet Mohammad hung on every word.
FOLLOWING THE TRAIL
To assess the LeJ threat, Reuters followed the group’s trail across Pakistan – from Ishaq’s compound, to Gilgit in the foothills of the Himalayas, recruiting grounds in central Punjab, and the backstreets of Karachi on the Arabian Sea coast.
In interviews, police, intelligence officials, clerics and LeJ members described a group that has grown more robust and appears to be operating across a much wider area in Pakistan than just a few years ago. But it had a head start.
The LeJ once enjoyed the open support of the powerful spy agency, the Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence. The ISI used such groups as military proxies in India and Afghanistan and to counter Shi’ite militant groups.
Since being outlawed after the attacks of September 11, 2001, LeJ has worked with Sunni radical groups al Qaeda and the Pakistani Taliban in several high-profile strikes. Among them were assaults in 2009 on Pakistan’s military headquarters and on Sri Lanka’s visiting cricket team. Washington says LeJ was involved in the killing of Wall Street Journal correspondent Daniel Pearl in 2002.
Now it is gathering strength anew. The risks are heightened by Pakistan’s long-standing role as a battlefield in a proxy war between Sunni Saudi Arabia and Shi’ite Iran, which have been competing for influence in Asia and the Middle East since the 1979 Iranian revolution.
That competition has heated up since the United States toppled secularist dictator Saddam Hussein in Iraq and left the country under the control of an Iranian-influenced Shi’ite government. Intelligence officials say the LeJ is drawing financial support from Saudi donors and other Sunni sources.
“Unfortunately, the state for strategic reasons turned a blind eye to the LeJ for a long time,” said a retired army general. “Now we have a situation where it has become Pakistan’s Frankenstein.”
Interior Minister Rehman Malik, who is in charge of internal security, told Reuters that “we always take action” against the LeJ when the group is suspected of murder or terrorism. “We track people and arrest them.”
When asked why those arrested are often freed, he said: “Look, my job is to arrest people, not to let them go. We all know who lets them off the hook and why,” he said, referring to local politicians and elements of the military who turn a blind eye to their activities or even support them in some cases.
Read story in multimedia PDF link.reuters.com/nah53t or see link.reuters.com/kac58m
Pakistan blog: blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/
SACRED CALLING
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, whose name means Soldiers of Jhangvi (after its founder, Haq Maulana Nawab Jhangvi), isn’t the only lethal militant group that once enjoyed patronage from the spy agency.
One is Lashkar-e-Taiba (Soldiers of the Pure), which fights against Indian control in disputed Kashmir. It is blamed for several deadly attacks on Indian soil, including the November 2008 attacks in Mumbai, and an audacious raid on India’s parliament in December 2001 with another Kashmiri militant group, Jaishi-e-Mohammad (Army of Mohammad). That raid brought India and Pakistan to the brink of war.
Another is the Pakistani Taliban. Its attack this month on 14-year-old Malala Yousafzai in Swat was only the most recent in a long list of strikes on civilian and military targets, mainly in the unruly tribal area along the Afghan border.
What makes LeJ particularly dangerous, however, is that the group is based in Pakistan’s Punjab heartland. And it is not just attacking targets in Pakistan’s neighbours, but has also targetted the state, including the 2009 attack on Pakistan’s military headquarters.
LeJ was established as an offshoot of another anti-Shi’ite organisation called Sipah-e-Sahaba (Soldiers of Mohammad’s Companions).
LeJ believes it has a sacred calling – to protect the legacy of the companions of the Prophet Mohammad – and it sees Shi’ites as the main threat.
Mahmood Baber, educated in a madrassa, was drawn by LeJ’s call to holy war against Shi’ite infidels. His 16-year career in the movement ended in October, when he and other LeJ members were arrested.
Handcuffed and with a cloth thrown over his head at a Karachi police station, Baber described for Reuters the “great satisfaction” he felt killing 14 Shi’ite “terrorists” over the years. His voice choked with emotion when he said that for 1,400 years Shi’ites had insulted the companions of the Prophet.
“Get rid of Shi’ites. That is our goal. May God help us,” he said, before intelligence agents led him away for a fresh round of interrogation.
The schism between Sunnis and Shi’ites developed after the Prophet Muhammad died in 632 when his followers could not agree on a successor. Sunnis recognize the first four caliphs as his rightful successors; the Shi’ites believe the prophet named his son-in-law Ali. Emotions over the issue have boiled through modern times and even pushed some countries, including Iraq five years ago, to the brink of civil war.
DEMONISING IRAN
The LeJ’s leader, Ishaq, lives in a house whose gate bears a sign inviting residents of the town to debate whether Shi’ites are infidels.
These days Ishaq calls himself a leader of Sipah-e-Sahaba, the LeJ parent group. Pakistani officials say he still runs, or at least inspires, LeJ. Ishaq denies any wrongdoing, repeatedly saying: “I’ve been acquitted.” He has indeed been acquitted 34 times on charges of culpable homicide and terrorism.
He does not hide his feelings about Shi’ites, his voice growing strident as he opened a plastic folder filled with printouts from what he describes as Shi’ite Internet sites.
One contained a photo of a pig, an animal considered by Muslims to be dirty, and is accompanied by an insult to Sunnis. Another alleges the Prophet Mohammad’s wife committed adultery – all proof, he says, that Shi’ites are blasphemous, and deserve punishment.
“Whoever insults the companions of the Holy Prophet should be given a death sentence,” Ishaq declares.
Ishaq and other hardline Sunnis believe that Iran is trying to foment revolution in Pakistan to turn it into a Shi’ite state, though no evidence for that is offered.
THE SAUDI CONNECTION
In the Punjab town of Jhang, LeJ’s birthplace, SSP leader Maulana Mohammad Ahmed Ludhianvi describes what he says are Tehran’s grand designs. Iranian consular offices and cultural centres, he alleges, are actually a front for its intelligence agencies.
“If Iranian interference continues it will destroy this country,” said Ludhianvi in an interview in his home. The state provides him with armed guards, fearful any harm done to him could trigger sectarian bloodletting.
The Iranian embassy in Islamabad, asked for a response to that allegation, issued a statement denouncing sectarian violence.
“What is happening today in the name of sectarianism has nothing to do with Muslims and their ideologies,” it said.
Ludhianvi insisted he was just a politician. “I would like to tell you that I am not a murderer, I am not a killer, I am not a terrorist. We are a political party.”
After a meal of chicken, curry and spinach, Ludhianvi and his aides stood up to warmly welcome a visitor: Saudi Arabia-based cleric Malik Abdul Haq al-Meqqi.
A Pakistani cleric knowledgeable about Sunni groups described Meqqi as a middleman between Saudi donors and intelligence agencies and the LeJ, the SSP and other groups.
“Of course, Saudi Arabia supports these groups. They want to keep Iranian influence in check in Pakistan, so they pay,” the Pakistani cleric said. His account squared with that of a Pakistani intelligence agent, who said jailed militants had confessed that LeJ received Saudi funding.
Saudi cleric Meqqi denied that, and SSP leader Ludhianvi concurred: “We have not taken a penny from the Saudi government,” he told Reuters.
Saudi Arabia’s alleged financing of Sunni militant groups has been a sore point in Washington. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned in a December 2009 classified diplomatic cable that charities and donors in Saudi Arabia were the “most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide.” In the cable, released by Wikileaks, Clinton said it was “an ongoing challenge” to persuade Saudi officials to treat such activity as a strategic priority. She said the groups funded included al-Qaeda, the Taliban and Lashkar-e-Taiba.
The Saudi embassy in Islamabad and officials in Saudi Arabia were unavailable for comment.
SHI’ITE REVENGE
Some Shia groups do look to Iran’s clerical establishment for spiritual leadership, but insist they have no aims beyond protecting members from Sunni attacks.
In the offices of a Shi’ite organisation in Karachi, images of the late Iranian leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini are featured on a wall clock. There, a Pakistani Shi’ite woman named Shafqat Batool described what happened to her son, a judge, when he left for work on August 30.
Minutes after Sayid Zulfiqar stepped out of the family home in Quetta, she said, witnesses told the family three men on a motorcycle opened fire with Kalashnikov rifles. One of the assailants then grabbed a weapon from Zulfiqar’s bleeding driver and pumped more bullets into her son.
It prompted Zulfiqar’s family to move to Karachi. “We are not safe anywhere in the country,” his mother said. “People are horrified, people can’t sleep.”
The fear is palpable in Quetta, the mountainous provincial capital of southwestern Baluchistan. LeJ has unleashed an escalating campaign there of suicide bombings and assassinations against ethnic Hazaras – Persian-speaking Shi’ites who mostly emigrated from Afghanistan and are a small minority of the Shi’ite population in Pakistan.
At least 100 Hazaras have been killed this year, according to Human Rights Watch, leaving some 500,000 Hazaras fearful of venturing out of their enclaves.
“We are under siege; we can’t move anywhere,” said Khaliq Hazara, chairman of the Hazara Democratic Party. “Hazaras are being killed and there is nobody to take any action.
In Quetta and Karachi, Shi’ite leaders say they are urging young men to exercise restraint and buy weapons only for self-defence.
“We are controlling our youth and stopping them from reacting,” said Syed Sadiq Raza Taqvi, a Karachi cleric, seated beside a calendar with images of Iranian Revolutionary Guards.
But with each killing, the temptation to take revenge grows.
Shi’ite extremists have not adopted the kind of attacks favoured by LeJ. But they have hunted down members of the SSP.
One such case was an attack survived by Sohaib Nadeem, 27, son of an SSP member. Men he described as “Shi’ite terrorists backed by Iran” opened fire on the Nadeem family in their car. Nadeem survived nine gunshot wounds but his father and brothers were killed. “The Shi’ites are our enemies,” Nadeem said.
CONFEDERATION OF MILITANTS
When the Taliban and al Qaeda want to reach targets outside their strongholds on the Afghan border, they turn to LeJ to provide intelligence, safe houses or young volunteers eager for martyrdom, police and intelligence officials said.
“Lashkar-e-Jhangvi is the detonator of terrorism in Pakistan,” said Karachi Police Superintendent Raja Umer Khattab, who has interrogated more than 100 members. “The Taliban needs Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. Al Qaeda needs Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. They are involved in most terrorism cases.”
The massacre of Shi’ite bus passengers outside Gilgit has had a profound impact on this mountaineering hub in the Himalayan foothills. Never before had Sunni extremists asked for identification to single out Shi’ites and then kill them on such a large scale.
Sunnis and Shi’ites, who had lived in harmony for decades, now cope with sectarian no-go zones.
“Sunnis can’t go to some areas and Shi’ites can’t go to others,” lamented Gilgit shopkeeper Muneer Hussain Shah, a Shi’ite whose brother was killed in a grenade attack.
When violence erupts, text messages circulate rallying one sect or the other. Shops and schools close. Authorities have banned motorcycles to stop drive-by shootings.
Law enforcement itself is a victim of sectarianism in Gilgit, said police chief Usman Zakria. Shi’ite officers are reluctant to investigate crimes committed by Shi’ites, and the same is true of Sunnis.
“They are in disarray,” said Zakria. “None of this has happened before.” (Additional reporting by Imtiaz Shah in KARACHI, Mehreen Zahra-Malik in ISLAMABAD and Matthew Green in QUETTA; Editing by Bill Tarrant and Michael Williams)
http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/pakistan-militants-idINDEE89N00420121024
HUMAN RIGHTS
Pakistan’s rights record slammed by UN
As Pakistan seeks to become a member of the United Nations’ Human Rights Council, the West has once again expressed ‘serious concern’ over human rights violations in the Islamic country.
Pakistan’s bid to become a member of United Nations’ Human Rights Council (HRC) suffered a setback on Tuesday when the HRC members slammed the human rights situation in Pakistan at the council’s Universal Periodic Review meeting in Geneva.
New HRC members will be elected on November 12 and Pakistan hopes it will get a seat at the council. Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar led the delegation to Geneva to defend Islamabad’s human rights record and convince the member states to vote for her country.
“Today Pakistan is a functional democracy with an elected and sovereign parliament, an independent judiciary, a free media and a vibrant and robust civil society,” Khar told the HRC.
She said that her government was working hard to improve human rights in Pakistan and defeat extremism.
Sharp criticism
Most HRC member countries, however, seemed unimpressed by Khar’s defense.
Rights activists have been campaigning for the repeal of blasphemy laws
“We have serious concerns about the human rights situation in Pakistan,” US ambassador to the HRC, Eileen Donahoe, told the council. She, in particular, mentioned the army operations “aimed at silencing dissent” in the Pakistani province of Baluchistan, which is facing a protracted separatist movement.
Donahoe said that Pakistan should “ensure that those guilty of torture, enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings must be prosecuted” and that laws discriminating against religious minorities should be reformed.
Pakistan’s controversial blasphemy laws also came under criticism. The British delegate condemned the recent case of a young Christian girl, who had been accused by an Islamic cleric of burning pages of the Koran. The girl – who was released by a Pakistani court on bail – had spent several weeks in jail on blasphemy charges.
The US and British condemnation was echoed by Sweden, Switzerland and some other European countries, including Belarus. The Belarus delegate urged Islamabad to fight the trafficking of women and children, stop sexual exploitation and the cruel treatment of children.
‘A weak defense’
Pakistani human rights activist Saleha Athar told DW that it was not easy to defend the dismal human rights situation in Pakistan. She said that Khar’s defense of Pakistan’s human rights situation was “weak.”
“The human rights situation in Pakistan is very bad,” Athar said. “Khar was trying to defend her government and not the human rights situation in Pakistan.”
President Zardari’s government has passed a number of pro-human rights laws
Athar appreciated the fact that Pakistan had a democratic government but said that democracy was still controlled by the Pakistani army.
“True democracy guarantees better human rights but unfortunately, Pakistan is far away from it,” Athar commented, adding that in recent years, the Pakistani parliament had passed a number of bills and laws to empower women and minorities but that they would remain meaningless until the government made sure they were properly implemented.
She said that the issue of “forced disappearances, extremism, and religious rights of minorities” needed government’s immediate attention.
Karachi-based rights campaigner Zahid Farooq told DW that one should not expect human rights to improve in a country whose legislations were based on religion.
“Religious minorities are being targeted in Pakistan. The blasphemy laws are used to grab their lands, to steal their wealth and to kidnap their women,” said Farooq, adding that Pakistan’s founder Muhammad Ali Jinnah had a liberal vision for Pakistan but that the successive regimes turned the country into a theocratic state.
http://www.dw.de/pakistans-rights-record-slammed-by-un/a-16345027
Pakistan, human rights, both in the same sentence. It is very appropriate on october 31,
it is halloween. What a scary thought ? When you start calling ” KALIMA GO” as kafirs, this is the logical result. Why does not chief justice take suo moto on human killings.
Ahmadies ,shias,hazaras are being killed. It is known fact that Shah Faisal, Z.A.Bhutto were vanished because of 100 year old prophecy of the founder of the ahmadiyya muslim sect. General Zia reached his end because of the prayer duel challenged by 4th head of ahmadiyya sect. Afghanistan is suffering because 100 years ago, a companion of the founder of the ahmadiyya sect was stoned to death by amir of kabul. He said ” serzamin-e- Afghanistan, too KHUDA ki nazar main gir gaye” Pakistan should be champion of human rights because it is the only country made int name of ISLAM. Pakistan has to pull the bull by the horn and get rid of mullahs.
http://dcgdfhedhd.blog.com/
cheap courtney bridget jerseys
Discount Seahawks Gear cheap josh brown jerseys – Norberto –