Sipah-e-Sahaba and Taliban: Brothers in arms – by Ayesha Siddiqa
posted by Abdul Nishapuri | July 19, 2010 | In Blogs Cross postedRelated posts: The growing links between Taliban and Deobandi Sipah-e-Sahaba in Pakistan – The Economist article
Exposed: Links between Deobandi militants of Sipah Sahaba and Uzbek militants
Sipah Sahaba and Taliban are two names of the same Deobandi militant organization
Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan
The Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan (SSP) was formed in 1985 in Jhang mainly by four Deobandi, anti-Shia clerics: Maulana Haq Nawaz Jhangvi , Maulana Zia-ur-Rehman Faruqi, Maulana Easar-ul-Haq Qasmi and Maulana Azam Tariq. The group had grown out of the Anjuman-e-Sipah-e-Sahaba, and was supported by the General Zia regime to deal with what was considered in Islamabad and Riyadh as the Iranian threat. Moreover, as renowned academic Vali Nasr claims, establishing the SSP was part of Zia’s strategy to counter the Shia sect in Pakistan, as he considered it inimical to the Islamisation of the state and society. Allegedly, the ISI was therefore involved in sectarian killings and was supportive of such rabid Sunni outfits. The deliberate ouster of Shia-based militant outfits after 1989 is evidence of the enigmatic agency’s support for a particular ideology.
According to writer and columnist Khaled Ahmed, whose book on sectarian violence in Pakistan will be published soon, the initial financing for the SSP was secured from both internal and external sources. The internal source was mainly the local trader-merchant class in Jhang, especially the likes of local businessman Sheikh Yusuf, who was also a primary contractor for the army. The external source, on the other hand, comprised funding received from the Arab rulers of the Gulf, who used to visit Rahim Yar Khan on hunting trips. He claims that Maulana Jhangvi also enriched himself through this connection. Moreover, due to the links of its leaders with South Punjab, the outfit grew most exponentially in this particular region. It is hence not surprising to see a rise in sectarian violence in South Punjab, especially during the 1980s and the 1990s.
For those who forget that there was ever the influence of such militant outfits in the Punjab, it would be advisable to recall SSP terrorists like Riaz Basra, who had 300 murders to his credit before he was finally killed in 2002. The SSP was also responsible for an attack on former prime minister Nawaz Sharif in 1997/98. Sharif escaped a bomb explosion on a bridge en route to his farmhouse in Raiwind. The rivalry between the SSP and the Sharifs began after Shahbaz Sharif had some SSP terrorists eliminated. It has, however, been reported that the divide between the PML-N and the SSP and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ) has been bridged recently through negotiations between the parties. Ostensibly, a deal was struck, in which the PML-N Punjab government promised to create job quotas for SSP members in exchange for the withdrawal of the LeJ candidate standing against Shahbaz Sharif in Bhakkar.
The SSP (currently operating as Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat ASWJ) advocates Deobandi ideology and served as the basic ideological and militant curry paste out of which several other jihadi outfits grew, such as the LeJ, Harkat-ul-Mujahideen, Harkat-ul-Ansar and Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM).
The SSP has been involved in both sectarian violence and war, initially against the former Soviet Union, and later the US. In fact, Ramzi Yusuf, who was involved in trying to blow up the World Trade Centre in 1993, was linked to this militant outfit. This group is also reputed to have been the first to dispatch its jihadis to join Al-Qaeda. In any case, it had gone to fight in Afghanistan in 1985. Domestically, it was involved in a spate of Shia killings, particularly those of Shia doctors in Karachi in 2001. However, the SSP also developed itself as a political entity, with some of its prominent members contesting elections. For instance, Maulana Azam Tariq, who was one of its founding members and became its head in 1997, contested the 1990, 1993 and 2002 elections. The political and militant wings of the SSP, like those of Hamas, are difficult to distinguish – the latter continues to be involved in jihad and now supports the Taliban.
The SSP seems to have been resurrected in South Punjab in the past couple of years and also has links with other outfits such as the JeM. Apparently, in a meeting in October 2008, Masood Azhar performed the dastaarbandi of SSP’s Maulana Zia-ul-Haq Qasmi, who was appointed the chairman of the supreme council of the SSP.
Ideologically different from the other organisations, the Lashkar-e-Tayyaba (LeT) is an organisation based in Central Punjab that has now spread its tentacles throughout South Punjab as well. Established during the early 1990s in the province of Kunar in Afghanistan, by Hafiz Saeed, the LeT has its headquarters in Muridke, near Lahore. However, this might only be the token centre of the operation, which has franchises in other sub-regions including South Punjab, particularly Punjabi ethnic settlements in Seraiki-speaking areas. For instance, in the Bahawalpur division, it has greater influence in villages with Punjabi settlements, e.g. Yazman, Shahiwala, Kalanchwala, Bahawalnagar and those parts of Cholistan where there are new settlements.
The LeT is extremely ingenuous and creative in attracting people, including women, to its fold. It probably has to work harder than other outfits in this area, as it is predominantly known as a Barelvi stronghold with only a secondary influence of Deobandism. Most of the Deobandi followers view the LeT with suspicion. However, outright conflicts between the Deobandi groups and the LeT have not yet occurred.
The LeT continues to draw people to its fold through intelligent propaganda mechanisms, which include large congregations at the ghaibana namaz-e-janaza and wall graffiti. In the past few years, the LeT has also earned a name for its welfare activities and for helping the Pakistan Army in Kashmir, especially in the wake of the 2006 earthquake. The organisation seems to now be active once more, as it has been allowed to operate in the refugee camps for the Swat IDPs, providing welfare and relief.
The mastermind behind the Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) is Maulana Masood Azhar of Bahawalpur, who created the outfit after returning from India in 2000. Azhar was initially a member of the SSP. Later, he joined the Harkat-ul-Mujahideen (HuM), and was instrumental in forming the Hartak-ul-Ansar (HuA) by combining the HuM and another outfit called the Harkat-ul-Jihad (HuJ). The HuA was deeply involved in Afghanistan. According to one report, 39 out of 113 jihadis caught in Afghanistan in 1997 belonged to this group.
Azhar was caught in Indian-administered Kashmir in 1993, from where he managed to return to Pakistan in 2000, courtesy of the Taliban and Pakistan’s intelligence agencies. Subsequently, he established the JeM, due to his differences with the Pashtoon militant leader Fazlul Rehman Khalil. Reportedly, they had separated due to ideological differences, including the fact that Khalil did not necessarily support the Kashmir jihad on grounds that the majority of Kashmiris were Barelvis.
In any case, breaking up old organisations and building newer ones is not an anomaly. It must be remembered that at the time of 9/11 there were about 72 militant outfits operating in the Punjab. Many of these splinter groups were created by breaking up parent organisations, if they were seen as not delivering or spinning out of control.
Masood Azhar and his party have a long-standing relationship with the intelligence agencies who have, on several occasions, come to his rescue, even helping to free him in 2002/2003. Sources claim that Maulana Tahir Ashrafi, who was close to both the Shujaat Hussain/Pervaiz Elahi government and the secret agencies, was instrumental in the release, which went through despite the opposition of the district police. The ISI was also allegedly instrumental in building up the JeM.
Azhar belonged to a humble family of Bahawalpur. Born to Ustad Allah Bakhsh, a primary school teacher with nine children who lived in a one-and-a-half marla house inside the old city, Masood Azhar and his family now own about four kanals of property in Bahawalpur, and another six-and-a-half acres outside the city. The value of their vehicles and military equipment runs into further millions of rupees that are unaccounted for. The group itself recently purchased land in Bahawalpur, which many believe is being used as a training camp. It seems a payment of Rs 7,600,000 was made from untraceable sources. The general perception about the organisation is that it has more than sufficient resources, obtained from multiple sources, including its welfare susidiary, the Al-Rehmat Trust.
A former jihadi and JeM accountant told me he was frustrated to see the money received for the martyrs and their families being used by Masood Azhar for the construction of a new room and a toilet for his residence after his marriage. Similarly, police officials responsible for keeping an eye on the organisation talk about the questionable behaviour of Azhar’s younger brother, Abdul Rauf Azhar.
It is possibly due to the overly centralised structure of the organisation that Masood Azhar’s brother-in-law parted ways with him and set up another group called
Al-Furqan, which was allegedly involved in the assassination attempts against Musharraf. One of the proclaimed offenders in this case, Hafiz Ahsan, and his family are from Khankah Sharif, Bahawalpur.
A common link between the JeM, SSP and the LeJ is that they all follow the Deobandi ideology, which is also subscribed to by the Taliban. Furthermore, all three drew upon human resources that were trained during the initial Afghan war.
Although known for being an organisation dedicated to the Kashmir conflict, the JeM has also been engaged in Afghanistan lately. This is not such a leap, considering that Al-Qaeda under Osama bin Laden directly played the role of a benefactor of the organisation when it was being established in 2000. Rumour has it that bin Laden compensated the HeM for JeM’s takeover of the former’s assets, which had caused a conflict between the two. Most negotiations were facilitated and negotiated at the Banuri town madrassa in Karachi. The state, however, was said to have provided most of the logistic support and ensured that law-enforcement agencies stayed away.
In 2000, the JeM got into a confrontation with the local administration in Bahawalpur over the imprisonment of some of its members for their involvement in the harassment of a local transporter. The outfit’s jihadis surrounded the local town hall and Masood Azhar threatened that rivers of blood would flow if the state of Pakistan shifted its attention away from Kashmir. Eventually, most of the group’s members were freed and the senior superintendent of police responsible for the action against the outfit was transferred out – subtle evidence of government support for the JeM. Similarly, the police remained silent about the murder of Al-Furqan activist Rab Nawaz, who died in a shootout between the JeM and Al-Furqan in Bahawalpur a few months ago.
In the recent past, the JeM has won acclaim among its ilk for its links with Umar Saeed Sheikh, who was involved in the murder of Daniel Pearl. However, some experts claim that Sheikh was actually working for the Hizb-ut-Tehreer, with only a minor partnership with the JeM. Yet, it is indisputable that he was seen in the company of Maulana Masood Azhar, the outfit’s domineering leader.
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi
The Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ) grew out of the SSP and was established by two prominent SSP members in 1996, namely Malik Ishaq and Riaz Basra – one belonging to Khanewal and the other to Sargodha. The group itself was founded in Bhakkar, South Punjab. While Malik Ishaq is currently imprisoned in Sahiwal jail, Riaz Basra was killed in a police encounter in 2002. This only happened, however, after he managed to gain a lease on life from several governments. For instance, he was allowed to escape from police custody in 1994, after the Benazir Bhutto government and the LeJ’s parent organisation – the SSP – had entered into an election partnership.
The organisation was initially focused exclusively on the elimination of Shias. After 9/11, it diverted its attention towards fighting the war on terror against the US. In fact, the LeJ was allegedly one of the first outfits to send recruits to Al-Qaeda. According to renowned journalist Khaled Ahmed, this was due to the SSP and LeJ’s contacts with Arab rulers that visited South Punjab. Later, it had links with Khaled Sheikh Mohammad, who allegedly ordered the attack on the Karachi Corps Commander in 2004. Another prominent Al-Qaeda leader associated with this outfit is Abu Musab Al Zarqawi.
Currently, the group is seen as being instrumental in numerous terrorist attacks in Pakistan, especially in Lahore and Islamabad. The LeJ has developed stronger links with the Taliban as well, and enjoys a growing influence in a number of South Punjab towns and rural areas. This outfit plays a critical role in supplying manpower from within Punjab that is used in terrorist activities inside the province. The Islamabad Marriott bombing and the suicide attack on the police training facility in the capital have been linked with men from South Punjab, organised by the LeJ. More recently, four men from Jhang linked with the SSP and the LeJ were arrested in connection with the attack on the 15 headquarters in Islamabad.
The organisation has also propagated sectarian violence, such as the killing of the Iranian diplomat Sadiq Ganji, a group of Iranian technicians and a group of Iranian Air Force cadets visiting Pakistan. These killings during the 1990s blighted relations between Islamabad and Tehran. However, the state has yet to sentence Malik Ishaq, convicted in the aforementioned murders. A case of non-sectarian domestic violence is the attack against the Christian community in Bahawalpur city. The LeJ’s Shakeen Anwar, who belonged to Bahawalnagar, was instrumental in the attack on a church in October 2001. Although experts tend to argue that the SSP and the LeJ have a different policy from militant groups dedicated to Kashmir, evidence of linkage between the two is visible, especially in South Punjab.
Source: Newsline
i’m wondering why alot of air time in electronic media maulana ludhvani is getting ? almost everyday he is one or the other talk show . i don’t know what kind of the message media trying to give to the world. after media disgrace our parliament by showing the world that we can buy fake degree quite easily here , now trying to show that monster like ludhavani are actually quite social and even politician meets him for getting his support.
exposing politician is fair enough but real question is whether media will question him for his sectarian activities or just its an attempt to clear his name from alleged hand behind data darbar and eid milad-ul-nabi attacks in lahroe and faisalabd respectively.
media is promoting his as an alternative political force ,fair enough , but they have to remember according to election commission rules no party can have name representing as sect , and in case of ludhianvi his organization name is representating a particular sect.
i agree with the topic of ayesha saddiqi.i likethis topic
we can from these activity by stopping their funds,which is only possible when there is a socialist revolution.say no to capitalism.socialism or death.
I am impressed with the information provided by Dr Siddiqa regarding military outfits of Deobandi school of thought and state sponsership behind all the activities.In order to eradicate the militancy ,She should also highlight the militant activities of Sunni Tehrik,Tehrik-e-Jafria,Jamat-e-Islami and some Nationalist movements in Blauchistan and Sindh financed and supportted by fuedals and Pirs.Extremism in every shade of life should be condemned and discouraged.
Malik Ishaq of the LeJ is accused of carrying out hundreds of murders
but was not convicted because of lacunas in the legal system and the
police’s inability to collect evidence or run a sound witness
protection programme. Resultantly, he is being kept in jail under the
Maintenance of Public Order act; there is no other substantive case
against him. Let us also not forget that there are many in the lower
judiciary who are sympathetic towards the jihadi mindset. Not
surprisingly, Malik Ishaq was apparently allowed to cross-examine
prosecution witnesses inside jail even in cases not related to him.
The police official who tried to stop this practice was later
murdered.Shahbaz Sharif is responsible for agreeing to keep silent on
the jihadi ‘assets’. According to one source in the government, there
was an understanding that he would take care of these elements,
especially while the military was busy in the tribal areas. Therefore,
the Punjab chief minister and his loyal law minister, Rana Sanaullah,
deflected attention away from Punjab. There were even occasions when
senior police officers covered up the jihadis’ tracks and maligned
those that warned about such threats.
THOSE PEOPLE WHO ARE INVOLE IN SUPAH SAHABA THEY R NOT MUSLIM///////……!THEY R ANTI MUSLIM……!BCZ THEY R DANGR FOR MUSLIM/…..!THEY R AGENT OF AMRICA ND ISRAIL..!
waqaee in logo ko islam ka pata he ne ha,,k islam hai kia cheez,,or kis cheez ka darass day raha ha,,kissi ko kafir kehnay,,or kissi ko marny ka name islam ne ha
humain fakhar hai Alhamdullillah
dil dil jan jan taliban taliban
taliban ka doosra nam sipah e sahaba pakistan
Allah ne zinat bakhshi hai aflak ko raushan taroon se
Islam ne izzat pai hai mehboob e khuda(saw) ke yaroon se
Abu bakar o Umer(raz) hain sami o basar
Usman o Ali(raz) hain qalb o jigar
Huzoor(saw) ke hain manzoor e nazar
keo ho na mohabbat 4charoon se?
hotey hain khafa keo?
pucho to zara aghyaroon se
tareef e SAHABA(raz) sabit hai
Quran ke 30tiso paroon se
aur jo gustakh e ashab(raz) hai
lannatain us pe behisab hain
khak paye dar SAHABA(raz)
Aur woh musalman hai?? jo sahaba o kafir aur murtid likhta hai?? jo sayeda ammi ayesha(raz) ko kafira, tawaifa likhta hai? (MazAllah)
ALLAH KE BAREY MAIN SHIYO KA AQUIDA:- “ham us rub ko nahi mantey jis ne USMAN BIN AFFAN aur MOAVIA BIN ABU SUFIYAAN jesay badqumashon ko hukumat di hai”MAZALLAH (writter: khumaini, book:kashf e asrar, page# 107) check it refrence
ALLAH KE BAREY MAIN SHIYOO KA AQUIDA:- “Allah kabhi kabhi jhoot bolta hai, aur Allah se bhi bhool hoti hai”MAZALLAH (writter:yaqoob kulaini, book: usool e kafi, page# 338)check it refrence
ALLAH AUR NABI(saw) KE BAREY MAIN SHIYOO KA AQUIDA:- “na hum us rub ko mantey hain aur na us rub ke nabi ko jis ka khalifa abubakar ho”.MAZALLAH (shiya book: anwaar ul noumaania, page: 278, jild:2) check it refrence
ALLAH KE NABI(saw) KE BAREY MAIN SHIYOO KA AQUIDA “Allah ne nabi(saw) ko dant pilayi k aap har soorat me khalifat e Ali ka eylaan karain”.MAZALLAH (shiya book:tafseer e safi, jild:1, page# 458) check it refrence
SHIYA AQIDA E TAUHEED:- “khuda dost aur dushman ki tameez nahi kar sakta….”.MAZALLAH (shiya book: usool e kafi, jild:1, page: 368) check it refrence
SHIYA KA AQUIDA E TAUHEED:- “khuda ki ibadat ka haq yoon ada hota hai ke issay jahil man liya jay, aur khuda ne koi nabi nahi bhaija jis se bidda ka iqrar na lia ho, yani khuda ke jahil honey ka iqrar karta tab isay nabi maan liya jay…” MAZALLAH (shiya book: usool e kafi, jild:1, page# 84) check it refrence
ASHRA MUBASHIRA(raz) KE BAREY MAIN SHIYO KA AQIDA:- “Ashra Mubashra sahaba (raz) main se Ali (raz) ke ilawa baqi tamaam jahannum ke nichley tabqey main hon gey”.MAZALLAH (book: haq ul yaqeen, jild:1, page# 312) check it refrence
SHIYA GADDAR AUR QATIL:- “loog hamain gaddar aur qatilan e hussain kehtay hain,aaj main kehta hoon ke haan! shiyoo ne hi Ahl e bait se gaddari ki aur hazrat e Hussain(raz) ko shaheed kiya magar qasam le lo wo ham nahi they hamarey baap dada the hum to unka kaffara ada kar rahey hain matam kar ke”. (writter:bakir majlisi, book: bihar ul anwar, jild: 55, page: 34) check it refrence
SHIYA KA AQUIDA E MUTTAH(zina) :- “jub joosh e jawani bhar jae to apni maa behan se muttah(zina) kar lo”. writer: shiya padri mulla baqir majlisi, book: hayan e zahoor, page: 431, jild:3. aur is hi kitaab ke page# 936 pe ghalazat bakta hai ke “apni behan ki sharam gaah ko dekho magar neeyat k saaf honey tak” must check it refrence.
AHL E SUNNAT KE BAREY MAIN SHIYOON KA AQUIDA:- “ahl e sunnat khinzeer ke mushabeh hain”. (book:tehqeeq ul mateen,urdu tarjuma haq ul yaqeen, page 429, taba ul immamiya) check it refrence
SHIYA KA AQUIDA E MUTTAH:- “admi apni maah behan aur beti ko aagey aur pichey ke ilawa har jagah se dekh sakta hai”.(book: tuhfa e namaz e jafariya, jadeed, page 292)check it refrence
SHIYO MAIN MASLA E NIKAAH:- “mard ka mard se nikah jaiz hai aur apni maa, behan aur beti se bhi nikaah jaiz hai”. (book: farq al shiya, page 93) check it refrence
AHL E BAIT KE BAREY MAIN SHIYOON KA AQIDA:- “suhaag raat main nabi(saw) ne hazrat e fatima(raz) (yani nabi ki beti)se farmaiya ke jub tak main na aaon to kam shuroo mat karna phir huzoor aay to dono’n tangain daraz keen aur……… (meri zaban aur ye hath jin se main likh raha hoon yoh zaib nahi detay ke aagey ka bataon)” MAZALLAH (book: jala ul uyoon, hissa 1,page#194, writter: bakir majlisi lanti, matbua:tehran,iran) check it refrence
KHANDAAN E NABBUAT KE BADTAREEN DUSHMAN SHIYA KA AQEEDA:- “hauzoor(saw) ke nawasey ki khabar jub kuda ne maa sahadat k bhaiji to huzooz ne bar bar rad kia aur kaha mujhey aisay bachey ki zaroorat nahi hai hazrat fatima ke bhi inkar kia jub khuda ne lalach di ke is nasal se 9 imam banaunga to hazrat hassan ki wiladat aur bisharat ko qabool kia” MazAllah (book: usool e kafi, jild:1, page:194) check it refrence
SHIYOO KA KABA TULLAH KE BAREY MAIN AQEEDA:- “karbala kabey se afzal aur bar tar hai” MazAllah (book: haq ul yaqeen, page 15) check it refrence
SHIYOO KA AQEEDA E TAUHEED:- “beshak huzoor e pak(saw) ne meraaj ki raat khuda e pak ko 30 sala naujawaan ki sorat me dekha yahaan tak ke khuda e pak ke naaf tak hissa khali tha aur is ke nichey tak shakt or thous tha……” MazAllah (book: usool e kafi, jild:1, page:136) check it refrence
SHIYOO KA MAZHAB TAQIYA HAI:- “taqiya mera deen hai aur mere baap dada ka deen hai jo shaks taqiya na karey uska emaan nahi” mazAllah (writter:baqir majlisi, book: usool e kafi, page 484) check it refrence
ye kehtay hain ke humkhatam e nabbuat ko mantey hain magar jhoot boltey hain keo ke ye apney imamoon ko nabioon se afzal mantey hain, imam jub chahey halal ko haraam aur haraam ko halal kar sakta hai, imam masoom hai, imam ke pas ghaib ka ilm hai, kainaat ka tamam nizam imam ki 2 ungliyoonke darmiyaan chalta hai, aur imam tamaam ambiyaae karaam se afzal hai aur imam maah ki raan se paida hota hai MazAllah, ye agar khatam e nabbuat ka inkar nahi to kiya hai??? aur ham sab kehtay hain rasool (saw) ki shan main gustakhi karney wala wajib ul qatal hai to kiya ye rasool(saw) ke gustakh nahi hai ye to un ke baad 12 nabi aur nabiyoo se bhi afzal bana bethay hain MazAllah
SHIYOO KA KHATAM E NABBUAT KA KHULA INKAR:- “martaba e imamat martaba e peghambri se balatar hai” mazAllah (writter: baqir majlisi, book: hayat ul quloob, jild: 3, page:2) check it refrence
SHIYOON ALLAH(JJ) KE BAREY MAIN AQIDA:- “khuda ki ibadat ka haq yun ada hota hai ke isay jahil man liya jae aur khuda ne koi nabi nai bhaija jis se bidda ka iqrar na lia ho yahi khuda ke jahil honey ka iqrar karta tab isay nabi maan liya jay…..” mazAllah (book:usool e kafi, jild:1,page:84) check it refrence
kaha likha hai kafir ko kafir na kahoo???
quran uthain surah e kafiroon parhain “QUL YA AIYUHAL KAFIROON” Tarjuma: keh dijey aye kafiroo. jub Allah(jj) ne apney nabi(saw) se Quran main kaha hai ke keh dijey aye kafiroon to phir ye kesay ghalat ho sakta hai ke kafir ko kafir na kaho???? Quran per amal karna ibadat hai . beshak
For All My Muslim Brothers:
“AUR LARO IN (KAFIROON) SE YAHAAN TAK KE FITNA KHATAM HO JAY AUR HUKUM QAIM HO JAYE ALLAH(JJ) KA”.
(Al Quran, Surah AL-Anfal, Ayat# 39)
i m waiting for the answer’s of these questions aur agar sahaba e karam(raz) ko kafir kehna aur unhain galiyaan dena shiyoo ki ibadat hai to unhain kafir kehna hamari ibadat hai aur nabi(saw) ki hadees ka mafhoom hai jis ne meray sahaba ko bura kaha goya us ne mujhey bura kaha yani sahaba ko gali denay wala MazAllah nabi ki shan main bhi gustakhi kar raha hai aur nabi(saw) ka gustakh wajib ul qatal hai magar hum mulk ka aman kharaab karney ke haq main nahi ye hamara mulk hai magar yahaan agar koi hamarey sahaba ko gali de ga to hum us ko kafir kahaingey aur agar us ke badley main koi humain marey ga to newtons 3rd law of theory hai “any action has equal and opposit reaction” soch samajh kar waar karna SSP se takraney waley yaad rakhain har qadam pe shola nikley ga har shola HAQ Nawaaz hoga
Barailvi,Deobandi,Ahl e hadeeth ittahaad bamuqabil e shiyat
Agar duniya main rehna hai to kuch pehchan paida kar
libas e khizr main aksar kai rahzan bhi miltey hain
ye mulk jis ko islam ke nam per hasil kiya gaya hai yahaan islami nizam keo nahi hai??? nabi(saw) ki shariyat keo nahi hai?? kya democracy(jamhuriyat) islam main jaiz hai??? nahi, islam main jamhoriyat haraam hai islam main sirf shariyat hai yahaan is mulk e pakistan main agar aman chahiyey to sharai nizam qaim karo yahi tamaam masail ka hal hai ye musalmaan mulk hai is main super power amrica ko kaha jata hai ha ha ha ha supper power sirf Allah(jj) hai aur koi nahi to amrica ke banay hoyey qawaneen yahaan keo aur nabi(saw) ki shariyat keo nahi??? answer me plzzzzz m waiting for your answers
m Abbas ,age 18 from karachi north nazimabad doing inter in pre-eng 2nd year not hafiz not aalim just a normal ,social citizen of karachi n i neet answers of these questions plzzzz must answer me ke main agar apney papa ko gali denay waley ko bardasht nahikar sakta to nabi(saw) ke sahaba ko gali denay waley ko kesay bardasht karoon?? jub main apni mamma ko gali denay waley ko bardasht nahi kar sakta to main sayeda ammi ayesha siddiqua(raz) jin ko quran ne meri maa kaha un ko aur hazrat hafsa (raz) jo ke nabi(saw) ki aik aur zauja hain unko gali denay waley ko kesay bardasht karoon thats my problem aur agar ye intaha pasandi hai to hoon main intaha pasan agar ye dehshat gardi hai to hoon main dehshat gard agar ye buniyad parasti hai to hoon main buniyad parast aur mujhey fakhar hai is per mujhey ye sabaq mila hai aur kafir kafir kehna ye hamara ahtajaaj hai hamara issue hai hamaray dukh aur dard ka izhar hai is ka maqsad shar phailana nahi hai agar phailey to main ya sahaba ke sipahi sahaba(raz) ko gali denay waley ko musalman nahi keh saktey sorry very very sorry aur is condition main ke woh khud ko musalman kahain jo quran nahi manta kehta hai ke quran to bakri kha gai common sence ki baat hai kya woh insan musalmaan ho sakta hai aur ye chan aik aqaid mainey likhey bhi hain khud sochain kya hum ghalat hain jo 26 saal main 4500 sahadatain de kar bethey hain aur aaj subha bhi korangi main aik zimadar ko shaheed kiya gaya hai aur ye 4500 sirf zimadaraan aur qaideen ki quantity hai not karkunaan o hamdard un ka hisaab nahi hai hamarey pass phir bhi sirf karachi shehar se 25000 sirf rukniyat waley sathi hai aur main bataoon meri khud ki aaj tak rukniyat nahi hai aur 40% percent ki nahi hai 10 saal se band hai 2 oppration ho chukey hain aur kiya kar asaktey hain ye loog humain ye sabaq mila hai
fana fillah ki teh main baqa ka raaz muzmir hai
jisay marna nahi aata usay jina nahi aata
@Abbas Siddqui
Kafir kafir Shia kafir, jo na manay wo bhi kafir – by Zalaan
http://criticalppp.com/archives/27377
Just who is not a kafir? – by Amir Mir
http://criticalppp.com/archives/18615
Kafir factory: Shia kafir, Qadiani kafir – by Mohammed Hanif
http://criticalppp.com/archives/11794
Who is Kafir?, by Amjad Rashid
http://criticalppp.com/archives/36796
The Deobandi-Takfiri jihad against mushrik Barelvis and kafir Shias
http://criticalppp.com/archives/27795
Nawaz Sharif kafir? No, khariji mullah kafir
http://criticalppp.com/archives/12705
Extremist Deobandis of Taliban/Sipah-e-Sahaba massacre Barelvis at Baba Farid’s shrine in Pakpattan
http://criticalppp.com/archives/26899
‘Data Darbar had to be destroyed because of Ibn Taymiyya’: An interview with Khaled Ahmed
http://criticalppp.com/archives/19470
Sipah-e-Sahaba’s attack on Lahore’s Data Darbar, at least 37 killed, 175 injured
http://criticalppp.com/archives/17285
Extremist Deobandis (Taliban) massacre Barelvi Muslims in Karachi: Abdullah Shah Ghazi’s shrine attacked
http://criticalppp.com/archives/25239
From Jamea Hafsa to Rahman Baba: Farhat Taj
http://criticalppp.com/archives/1073
Taliban attack the tomb of Rahman Baba in Peshawar: William Dalrymple on the attack: Wahhabi radicals are determined to destroy a gentler, kinder Islam
http://criticalppp.com/archives/1149
Abdul nishapuri sahab in sub links ka kya matlab mujhey kuch samajh nahi aiya mainey jo bat ki thi un ka jawaab dain in links se kya sabit karna chahtay hain bhai aap jo true taliban hai na un ke pas itna time nahi hai ke woh wahaan se apna mahaaz choor kar aap se yahaan aakar laraingey ya bomb blast karaingey woh sarhadoon per amrici fauj se lar rahey hain aur jo ye kar rahey hain woh beshak dehshat gard hain aur agar main kahoon ke aap ne pishawar main bomb blast karway hain to?? bolna aasaan hai kuch nahi milta to apni zimadari se bhagney ke liyey taliban taliban kartey hain aisi koi baat nahi research karain kooney ke maindak ni banain aap loog just woh dekh rahey ho jo dikhaiya ja raha hai reality tak pohanch hi ni rahey hoo aur na pohanchna chahtey hoo kesi pe aisay ungli nahi uthatey brother khud ja kar personaly mil kar aao aur woh khud kahain ke hum ne kiya hai to bolain jo aap ko bataiya ja raha hai just us ko sach mat samjhain woh hukumran jo aap ke paisey kha rahey hain aap ke mulk ko baich rahey hain khud media pe keh rahey hain cruption hamara haq hai to un se aap such ki umeed rakhoo ye aap ki bewaqoofi hai bhai doosrey moamlaat main keh rahey ho ke woh crupt admi hai aur jub woh kesi pe ungli utha raha hai jis ko aapne aaj tak dekha bhi nahi suna bhi nahi tub us ko sachha man rahey hoo yaar aqal bar naimat hai aqal se kaam lain
9/11 se pehlay aman taliban hamarey dost aur 9/11 ke fauran bad woh hi loog hamarey dushman?????? 9/11 per diya raushan welcome welcome amrica welcome ke narey lal masjid operation ki himayat karachi main taliban ke wawailey aur jub imran farooq qatal case may amrica ny madad sey inkar kia to amrica mukhalif taqreer ye hai hamari politics din ba din barhta crime target killing bas nahi chalta ke is main bhi taliban ko zimadar thaira dain had hai koi yaar thori research karain jin ko crupt kehtay hoo un ki har baat ko rad kartey hoo aur jahaan taliban ki baat aay wahaan woh sahi hain yeh to aap khud ke sath ziyadti kar rahey hoo bhai
islam zindabad or sippa e sahabba r i like best jahad qayamat taq jari rahy gaa inshallah
Sipah-e-Sahaba built in responce to Shia Revolution in Iran, and Pakistani shias tried the same revolution in pakistan by making “Tehreek nafaz-e-Fiqah jafria pakistan” knowingly that they are minority. shias are actually hypocrates and Fitna & Fasad sect, they started targeted killings of Sipah-e-sahaba leaderes particularly “Allama Haq Nawaz Jhangvi” which finally leads in creation of “LeJ”……and then all shia sunni problem started in pakistan…….
To abuse Abu Bakr and Umar is NOT Kufr
“Fatwas of Ulama of Ahle-Sunnah”
Fatwa of Mulla Ali Qari
Mualla Ali Qari is one of the most respected Alim of Hanafi Fiqh. His shows his opinion in these words:
“It is neither proved by Sahaba nor Tabaeen to kill a person or declare him kafir who insults Abu Bakr and Umar. And the 3 Imams i.e. Imam Abu Hanifa, Imam Muhammad and Imam Abu Yousuf are unanimous that a person who insults Sheikhain (Abu Bakr and Umar) is neither Kafir nor Wajib-ul-Qatl. According to Imam Abu Hanifa and Imam Abu Yousuf, even the witness of such a person is acceptable.
Silalatul Risalah, page 19, published in Jordan
In order to more clarify this fact, Mullah Ali Qari writes in “Sharah Fiqh Akbar”:
“Then again from the opinion of Imam Abu Hanifa that Ahle Qibla, even if he is Ahle Bidah (innovator) doesn’t become Kafir due to his sins, it proves that no one becomes Kafir merely by abusing Abu Bakr and Umar. To abuse Abu Bakr and Umar is NOT Kufr, as Abush Shakur as Salimi has correctly proved in his book, at Tamhid. And it is becuase the basis of this claim (claim that reviling the Shaykhan is kufr) is not proven, nor its meaning is confirmed.
It is so because certainly abusing a Muslim is fisq (sin) as is proved by a confirmed hadith, and therefore the Shaykhan(Abu Bakr and Umar) will be equal to the other (Muslims) in this rule; and also if we suppose that some one murdered the Shaykhan, and even the two sons in law (Ali and Usman), all of them together, even then according to Ahlussunnah wa al-Jamah, he will not go out of Islam (i.e will not become kafir)
Sharah Fiqah Akbar, page 86, printed in Matba Qayyumi, Kanpur India.
Fatwa of Imam Hafidh Ibne Taymiyyah al-Damishqi
Imam Ibne Taymiyyah (Sheikul-ul-Islam of Salafies) wrote in his book Al-Sarimul Maslool, page 579 (first pulished by Taba Sa’ada Egypt), while giving arguments against Kufr of person who insulted Sahaba:
“And merely abusing some one other than the Prophets does not necessarily make the abuser Kafir; because some of those who were in the time of the Prophet (i.e companions) used to abuse one another and none of them was declared kafir because of this (practice); and (also) because it is not Wajib to have faith particularly in any of the companions; therefore abusing any of them does not detract from the faith in Allah and His books and His messengers and the Last day.”
Fatwa of Allamah Allauddin al-Haskafi al-Hanafi
The famous Imam of Fiqah Hanafi Allamah Muhammad Allauddin al-Haskafi writes in his book “Darul Mukhtar, chapter of Immamat,page 72, published in Delhi, India:
“And all the people, who pray while facing to Qibla, they are not Kafirs. Even the Kharijeen are also not Kafir, although they thought our lives and properties “Halal” for them.
And those people, who think it is allowed to curse companions (due to their wrong-doings)and (those who) deny the attributes of Allah (swt) and deny that Allah can be seen, these people are not Kaffir, while this belief is held by them due to their “Taweel” and “Doubt”.
One of the reason of their not being Kaffir is this that their witness is commonly accepted (among Muslims)…..
Fatwa of Allamah Abdul Hai Lakhnawi
A very famous Hanafi Fiqhi Alim from Indian Sub-Continent Allah Abdul Hai Lakhnawi states while giving an answer to a qestion:
“According to Fatawas, the most correct statement is this that Shias are not Kaffir. And abusing Abu Bakr and Umar doesn’t constitute Kufr. And it is the fatwa of Imam Abu Hanifa.”
He further writes with reference to the book “Al-tamheed fi Biyan al-Tauheed” by Abu Shakoor Salimi:
“And this statement of shias that Ali (as) is better than Sheikhain is only a “Bidah”(innovation) but doesn’t constitute Kufr. And some of shias say that it is obligatory to send “Lanah”(cursing) upon opponents of Ali (as) like Hadhrat ‘Aisha and Ameer Muawiyyah, it is also a “Bidah”, because they came to conclusion due to their “Taweel”. The summary of all this is this that it is totally against the “Madhab” of researchers to label shias as Kufir while they curse Sahaba.”
Majmoaa al-Fatawa, vol. 1, page 3-4, Matba Yousufi Farangi Mahli, Lakhnow, India………
Hadhrat Umar Ibne Abdul Aziz
One of his representatives from Kufa wrote him:
“Please advise me about a person, who abused Umar bin Al-Khattab. Should I kill him?”
He replied him:
“It is not allowed to kill any person due to abusing any muslim, except in case of abusing Rasool Allah (s). Thus, if anyone abuses Nabi (s), then his blood is Mubah”.
1. Al-Shifa Ba-Tarif Haqooq Mustafaa, vol. 2, page 325, published in Baraili.
2. Slalah al-Risalah Mulla Ali Qari, page 18, published in Jordan
3. Al-Tabaqaatul Kubraa, vol. 5, page 369, published in Bairut.
There is no tolerance, simply not.
Patras Bukhari k alfaz main aik daira Islam ka b hua krta tha,jis main kabhi log dakhil kiye jaty thy, aaj kal dakhila bnd hai sirf Kharij kiye jaty hain 🙂
tumarey mazab main lund marey
Hahahaha…Height of Ignorance…:D
Bhai jb me jahil tha to isi trha tm logo k jhootay behkaway me aa jata tha… Molvi mray samnay Quran o Hadees k Ghalat trjuma kr k Shia kafir k Naray lagatay thay…. Jb khud Research ki to pta chala k aesay koi refrnces hen he nahi…
SHUKAR AL HAMDO LILLAH Ab Me Aik BA”SHAOOR SUNNI hun….
Logo ko Ghalat references k sath Gumrah mt karo… me ne puri Shiaon ki Libraries chaan mari, Net pe Research ki, Misar se Al AZHAR university se Pata kraya mgr aesi koi Books ya refernce ni mila…..
Khudara Pakistan Dushman logo ye sb jhootay Propaganday bnd kro….
agr koi Sacha he to mjy Wo references Mail kro….
I could never afford one of these but maybe I could build a free one.
umer br0 ap faceb0o per aja0 my id nOman nOmy hai wha ap k0 hr trha ki shia haqiqt 0r aqaid mil jaenge
Dear Abbas Siddiqi
If Shariya Law is the solution of every problem then ” Wy with in less than 100 years after the death of Hazrat Muhammad PBUH muslim states were fighting against each other, with in less than 100 years muslims were killing and abusing the Sahaba razi-Allah-unho.
Was there not a Shariya law in Makkah when Hazrat Usman was martyred just very few years after the departure of Hazrat Muhammad PBUH. If we say to safe your stance that they were hypocrats then where were those pois muslim who were responsible to run Shariya law in Makkah and they let those hypocrates to Martyred Hazrat Usman Razi-Allah.
There is a hadith whose context is ”that you should obey your rulers even if they are of like a small headed negro, obey him if he do not order you agains Allah.”
Dear Ahmad Saddiqi i think you got the answeres of your questions. Please ponder upon your thoughts, Islam is not just fight fight, and just fight.
Leave what others are doing just think what we are doing.
Note if the hatred amongst will continue like the same way, Pakistan will not survive after 2020 (If in a Ghazwah during the presence of Hazrat Muhammad PBUH muslims can lose the war by not getting united then how come Pakistan survive)
Ahmad Saddiqi you should 100% accept this that in Pakistan we are no more a nation , exactly this is very very clear that we are no more. We are just differents sects if it will be more ture that we are now like tribes of stone age who want to kill the other tribes. We are in jungle where every animal is trying to kill the other animal.
Taliban Agar sarhadoon per lar rehay hain to woh khud chance day rehay hain America ko k hit pakistan. Do you think they would be able to safeguard pakistan like our nation safeguarded pakistan in 1965 , no , these jahadis were not able to safe Phalistine, no able to safe Libnan , not able to safe IRAQ, how come they will be able to safe a country when they are buying the arms from america.
Dear Saddiqui you are young just focus on your studies and do something for our country and try to make a nation in Islam no style of leadership is haram , there is a mashawarat system in Islam so how come democracy haram in islam
Terror’s Training Ground
By Ayesha Siddiqa 9 SEPTEMBER 2009 4 COMMENTS
A few years ago, I met some young boys from my village near Bahawalpur who were preparing to go on jihad. They smirked politely when I asked them to close their eyes and imagine their future. “We can tell you without closing our eyes that we don’t see anything.”
It was not entirely surprising. South Punjab is a region mired in poverty and underdevelopment. There are few job prospects for the youth. While the government has built airports and a few hospitals, these projects are symbolic and barely meet the needs of the area. It’s in areas like this, amid economic stagnation and hopelessness, that religious extremists find fertile ground to plant and spread their ideology.
The first step is recruitment – and the methodology is straightforward. Young children, or even men, are taken to madrassas in nearby towns. They are fed well and kept in living conditions considerably better than what they are used to. This is a simple psychological strategy meant to help them compare their homes with the alternatives offered by militant organisations. The returning children, like the boys I met, then undergo ideological indoctrination in a madrassa. Those who are indoctrinated always bring more friends and family with them. It is a swelling cycle.
Madrassas nurturing armies of young Islamic militants ready to embrace martyrdom have been on the rise for years in the Punjab. In fact, South Punjab has become the hub of jihadism. Yet, somehow, there are still many people in Pakistan who refuse to acknowledge this threat.
Four major militant outfits, the Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan (SSP), Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ), Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) and Lashkar-e-Tayyaba (LeT), are all comfortably ensconced in South Punjab (see article “Brothers in Arms”). Sources claim that there are about 5,000 to 9,000 youth from South Punjab fighting in Afghanistan and Waziristan. A renowned Pakistani researcher, Hassan Abbas cites a figure of 2,000 youth engaged in Waziristan. The area has become critical to planning, recruitment and logistical support for terrorist attacks in Pakistan and Afghanistan. In fact, in his study on the Punjabi Taliban, Abbas has quoted Tariq Pervez, the chief of a new government outfit named the National Counter-Terrorism Authority (NCTA), as saying that the jihad veterans in South Punjab are instrumental in providing the foot soldiers and implementing terror plans conceived and funded mainly by Al-Qaeda operatives. This shouldn’t come as a surprise considering that the force that conquered Khost in 1988-89 comprised numerous South Punjabi commanders who fought for the armies of various Afghan warlords such as Gulbuddin Hikmatyar and Burhanuddin Rabbani. Even now, all the four major organisations are involved in Afghanistan.
The above facts are not unknown to the provincial and federal governments or the army. It was not too long ago that the federal Interior Minister Rehman Malik equated South Punjab with Swat. The statement was negated by the IG Punjab. Perhaps, the senior police officer was not refuting his superior but challenging the story by Sabrina Tavernese of The New York Times (NYT). The story had highlighted jihadism in South Punjab, especially in Dera Ghazi Khan. The NYT story even drew a reaction from media outlets across the country. No one understood that South Punjab is being rightly equated with Swat, not because of violence but due to the presence of elements that aim at taking the society and state in another direction.
An English-language daily newspaper reacted to the NYT story by dispatching a journalist to South Punjab who wrote a series of articles that attempted to analyse the existing problem. One of the stories highlighted comments by the Bahawalpur Regional Police Officer (RPO) Mushtaq Sukhera, in which he denied that there was a threat of Talibanisation in South Punjab. He said that all such reports pertaining to South Punjab were nothing more than a figment of the western press’s imagination. Many others express a similar opinion. There are five explanations for this.
Firstly, opinion makers and policy makers are in a state of denial regarding the gravity of the problem. Additionally, they believe an overemphasis on this region might draw excessive US attention to South Punjab – an area epitomising mainstream Pakistan. Thus, it is difficult even to find anecdotal evidence regarding the activities of jihadis in this sub-region. We only gain some knowledge about the happenings from coincidental accidents like the blast that took place in a madrassa in Mian Chunoon, exposing the stockpile of arms its owner had stored on the premises.
Nothing is off limits: Militants attack the Sri Lankan cricket team in Lahore in March 2009.
Secondly, officer Sukhera and others like him do not see any threat because the Punjab-based outfits are “home-grown” and are not seen as directly connected to the war in Afghanistan. This is contestable on two counts: South Punjabi jihadists have been connected with the Afghan jihad since the 1980s and the majority is still engaged in fighting in Afghanistan.
Thirdly, since all these outfits were created by the ISI to support General Zia-ul-Haq’s Islamisation process, in essence to fight a proxy war for Saudi Arabia against Iran by targeting the Shia community, and later the Kashmir war, the officials feel comfortable that they will never spin out of control. Those that become uncontrollable, such as Al-Furqan, are then abandoned. This outfit was involved in the second assassination attempt on Musharraf and had initially broken away from the JeM after the leadership developed differences over assets, power and ideology. Thus, the district officials and intelligence agencies turned a blind eye to the killing of the district amir of Al-Furqan in Bahawalpur in May 2009. As far as the JeM is concerned, it continues its engagement with the establishment. In any case, groups that are partly committed to the Kashmir cause and confrontation with India continue to survive. This is certainly the perception about the LeT. But in reality, the Wahhabi outfit has also been engaged in other regions, such as the Afghan provinces of Kunar and Badakhshan since 2004.
Fourthly, there is confusion at the operational level in the government regarding the definition of Talibanisation, which is then reflected in the larger debate on the issue. Many, including the RPO, define the process as an effort by an armed group to use force to change the social conditioning in an area. Ostensibly, the militant outfits in the Punjab continue to coexist with the pirs, prostitutes and the drug mafia, and there is no reason that they will follow in the footsteps of Sufi Mohammad and Maulana Fazlullah, or Baitullah Mehsud. Since the authorities only recognise the pattern followed by the Afghan warlords or those in Pakistan’s tribal areas, they tend not to understand that what is happening in the Punjab may not be Talibanisation but could eventually prove to be as lethal as what they call Talibanisation.
Finally, many believe that Talibanisation cannot take place in a region known for practicing the Sufi version of Islam. There are many, besides the Bahawalpur RPO, who subscribe to the above theory. A year ago in an interview with an American channel, Farahnaz Ispahani, an MNA and wife of Pakistan’s ambassador to Washington, Husain Haqqani, stated that extremism couldn’t flourish in South Punjab because it was a land of Sufi shrines. This is partially true. The Sufi influence would work as a bulwark against this Talibanisation of society. However, Sufi Islam cannot fight poverty, underdevelopment and poor governance – all key factors that encourage Talibanisation.
South Punjab boasts names such as the Mazaris, Legharis and Gilanis, most of whom are not just politicians and big landowners but also belong to significant pir families. But they have done little to alleviate the sufferings of their constituents. A visit to Dera Ghazi Khan is depressing. Despite the fact that the division produced a president, Farooq Khan Leghari, the state of underdevelopment there is shocking. Reportedly, people living in the area in the immediate vicinity of the Leghari tribe could not sell their land without permission from the head of the tribe, the former president, who has been the tribal chief for many years. Under the circumstances, the poor and the dispossessed became attractive targets for militant outfits offering money. The country’s current economic downturn could raise the popularity of militant outfits.
In recent history, the gap created due to the non-performance of Sufi shrines and Barelvi Islam, or the exploitative nature of these institutions, has been filled partly by the Deobandi and Ahl-e-Hadith madrassa conversion teams and groups, such as the Tableeghi Jamaat, and militant outfits. This alternative, unfortunately, is equally exploitative in nature. Sadly, today the shrines and Barelvi Islam have little to offer in terms of “marketing” to counter the package deal offered by the Salafists for the life hereafter, especially to a shaheed: 70 hoors (virgins), a queen hoor (virgin queen), a crown of jewels and forgiveness for 70 additional people. This promise means a lot for the poor youth who cannot hope for any change in a pre-capitalist socio-economic and political environment, where power is hard to re-negotiate. Furthermore, as stated by the former information minister Mohammad Ali Durrani, who had been a jihadi from 1984-90, a poor youth suddenly turning into a jihadi commander is a tremendous story of social mobility and recognition that he would never get in his existing socio-economic system. More importantly, the Deobandis and Ahl-e-Hadith offer a textual basis for their package, which is difficult for the pirs to refute due to the lack of an internal religious discourse in the Islamic world. The modern generation of pirs has not engaged in an internal discourse to counter this ideological onslaught by the Salafis. The main belief of Salafism is that all Muslims should practice Islam as it was during the time of Prophet Muhammad. The religion at that time, according to them, was perfect. Salafism – which pre-dates Wahhabism – is often used interchangeably with Wahhabism, which is actually an extension of Salafism.
* * *
Punjab offers a different pattern of extremism and jihadism. The pattern is closer to what one saw in Swat, where Sufi Mohammad and his TNSM spent quite a few years indoctrinating the society and building up a social movement before they got embroiled in a conflict with the state. South Punjab’s story is, in a sense, like Swat’s in that there is a gradual strengthening of Salafism and a build-up of militancy in the area. The procedure of conversion though, dates back to pre-1947. Still, the 1980s were clearly a watershed, when both rabid ideology and jihad were introduced to the area. Zia-ul-Haq encouraged the opening up of religious seminaries that, unlike the more traditional madrassas that were usually attached with Sufi shrines, subscribed to Salafi ideology. In later years, South Punjab became critical to inducting people for the Kashmir jihad. The ascendancy of the Tableeghi Jamaat and such madrassas that presented a more rabid version of religion gradually prepared the ground for later invasion by the militant groups. Two reports prepared around 1994, firstly by the district collector Bahawalpur and later by the Punjab government, highlighted the exponential rise in the number of madrassas and how these fanned sectarian and ideological hatred in the province. These reports also stated that all of these seminaries were provided funding by the government through the zakat fund.
The number of seminaries had increased during and after the 1980s. According to a 1996 report, there were 883 madrassas in Bahawalpur, 361 in Dera Ghazi Khan, 325 in Multan and 149 in Sargodha district. The madrassas in Bahawalpur outnumbered all other cities, including Lahore. These numbers relate to Deobandi madrassas only and do not include the Ahl-e-Hadith, Barelvi and other sects. Newer estimates from the intelligence bureau for 2008 show approximately 1,383 madrassas in the Bahawalpur division that house 84,000 students. Although the highest number of madrassas is in Rahim Yar Khan district (559) followed by Bahawalpur (481) and Bahawalnagar (310), it is Bahawalpur in which the highest number of students (36,000) is enlisted. The total number of madrassa students in Pakistan has reached about one million.
Everyone has been so focused on FATA and the NWFP that they failed to notice the huge increase in religious seminaries in these districts of South Punjab. According to a study conducted by historian Tahir Kamran, the total number of madrassas in the Punjab rose from 1,320 in 1988 to 3,153 in 2000, an increase of almost 140%. These madrassas were meant to provide a rapid supply of jihadis to the Afghan war of the 1980s. At the time of 9/11, the Bahawalpur division alone could boast of approximately 15,000-20,000 trained militants, some of whom had resettled in their areas during the period that Musharraf claimed to have clamped down on the jihad industry. Many went into the education sector, opened private schools and even joined the media.
These madrassas play three essential roles. First, they convert people to Salafism and neutralise resistance to a more rabid interpretation of the Quran and Sunnah in society. Consequently, the majority of the Barelvis cannot present a logical resistance to the opposing ideology. In many instances, the Barelvis themselves get converted to the idea of jihad. Secondly, these madrassas are used to train youth, who are then inducted into jihad. Most of the foot soldiers come from the religious seminaries. One of the principles taught to the students pertains to the concept of jihad as being a sacred duty that has to continue until the end of a Muslim’s life or the end of the world. Lastly, madrassas are an essential transit point for the youth, who are recruited from government schools. They are usually put through the conversion process after they have attended a 21-day initial training programme in the Frontier province or Kashmir (see box “A Different Breed”).
State support, which follows two distinct tracks, is also instrumental in the growth of jihadism in this region. On the one hand, there has generally been a link or understanding between political parties and militant groups. Since political parties are unable to eliminate militants or most politicians are sympathetic towards the militants, they tend to curb their activities through political deal-making. The understanding between the SSP and Benazir Bhutto after the 1993 elections, or the alleged deal between the PML-N and the SSP during the 2008 elections, denote the relationship between major political parties and the jihadis. Currently, the SSP in South Punjab is more supportive of the PML-N.
The second track involves operational links between the outfits and the state’s intelligence apparatus. As mentioned earlier, some of the outfits claim to have received training from the country’s intelligence agencies. Even now, local people talk of truckloads of weapons arriving at the doorstep of the JeM headquarters and other sites in the middle of the night. While official sources continue to claim that the outfit was banned and does not exist, or that Masood Azhar is on the run from his hometown of Bahawalpur, the facts prove otherwise. For instance, the outfit continues to acquire real estate in the area, such as a new site near Chowk Azam in Bahawalpur, which many believe is being used as a training site. Although the new police chief has put restraints on the JeM and disallowed it from constructing on the site, the outfit continues to appropriate more land around the area. Junior police officials even claim seeing tunnels being dug inside the premises. The new facility is on the bank of the Lahore-Karachi national highway, which means that in the event of a crisis, the JeM could block the road as has happened in Kohat and elsewhere. Furthermore, the outfit’s main headquarters in the city is guarded by AK-47-armed men who harass any journalist trying to take a photograph of the building. In one instance, even a police official was shooed away and later intimidated by spooks of an intelligence agency for spying on the outfit. Despite the claim that the SSP, the LeJ and the JeM have broken ties with intelligence agencies and are now fighting the army in Waziristan, the fact remains that their presence in the towns of South Punjab continues unhindered.
Is it naivety and inefficiency on the part of officialdom or a deliberate effort to withhold information? The government claims that Maulana Masood Azhar has not visited his hometown in the last three years. But he held a massive book launch of his new publication Fatah-ul-Jawad: Quranic Verses on Jihad, on April 28, 2008, in Bahawalpur. Moreover, JeM’s armed men manned all entrances and exits to the city that day – and there was no police force in sight. The ISI is said to have severed its links with the JeM for assisting the Pashtoon Taliban in inciting violence in the country. Sources from FATA claim, however, that the JeM, Harkat-ul-Mujahideen (HuM) and LeT are suspected by the Taliban for their links with state agencies.
In addition, intelligence agencies reportedly ward off anyone attempting to probe into the affairs of these outfits. In one case, a local in Bahawalpur city invoked daily visits from a certain agency after he assisted a foreign journalist. Similarly, only six months back, a BBC team was chased out of the area by agency officials. In fact, intelligence officials, who had forgotten about my existence since my last book was published, revisited my village in South Punjab soon after I began writing on militancy in the area and have gone to the extent of planting a story in one of the Urdu newspapers to malign me in my own area. In any case, no serious operation was conducted against these outfits after the Mumbai attacks and the recent spate of violence in the country. Hence, all of them continue to survive.
The Deobandi outfits are not the only ones popular in South Punjab. Ahl-e-Hadith/Wahhabi organisations such as the Tehreek-ul-Mujahidden (TuM) and the LeT also have a following in the region. While TuM, which is relatively a smaller organisation, has support in Dera Ghazi Khan, the LeT is popular in Bahawalpur, Multan and the areas bordering Central Punjab. Headquartered in Muridke, the LeT is popular among the Punjabi and Urdu-speaking Mohajir settlers.
There are obvious sociological reasons for LeT’s relative popularity among these people. The majority of this population represents either the lower-middle-class farmers or middle-class trader-merchants. The middle class is instrumental in providing funding to these outfits. And the support is not confined to South Punjab alone. In fact, middle-class trader-merchants from other parts of the Punjab also feed jihad through their funding. This does not mean that there are no Seraiki speakers in Wahhabi organisations but just that the dominant influence is that of the Punjabis and Mohajirs. The Seraiki-speaking population is mostly associated with the SSP, LeJ and JeM, not to mention the freelancing jihadis that have direct links with the Tehrik-e-Taliban (TTP).
The LeT’s presence in South Punjab is far more obvious than others courtesy of the wall chalkings and social work by its sister outfit, the Jamaat-ud-Dawa. Despite the rumours of friction between the LeT and the JuD leadership, the two segments operate in unison in South Punjab. Three of the favourite areas of recruitment in South Punjab for all outfits are Cholistan in Bahawalpur, the Rekh in Dera Ghazi Khan, and the Kacha area in Rajanpur. The first two are desert areas known for their poverty and underdevelopment, while the third is known for dacoits. However, another known feature of Kacha in Rajanpur is that the clerics of the Lal Masjid come from this area and have partly managed to push back the dacoits. Local sources claim that the influence of the clerics has increased since they started receiving cooperation from the police to jointly fight the dacoits.
Organisations such as the LeT have even begun to recruit women in the Punjab. These women undergo 21 days of ideological and military training. The goal is to ensure that these women will be able to fight if their menfolk are out on jihad and an enemy attacks Pakistan.
The militant outfits are rich, both ideologically and materially. They have ample financial resources that flow from four distinct sources: official sources (in some cases); Middle Eastern and Gulf states (not necessarily official channels); donations; and the Punjabi middle class, which is predominantly engaged in funding both madrassas and jihad for social, moral and political ends. With regard to donations, the militant outfits are extremely responsive to the changing environment and have adapted their money-collection tactics. Gone are the days of money-collection boxes. Now, especially in villages, followers are asked to raise money by selling harvested crops. And in terms of the Punjabi middle class, there are traders in Islamabad and other smaller urban centres that contribute regularly to the cause. These trader-merchants and upcoming entrepreneurs see donations to these outfits as a source of atonement for their sins. In Tahir Kamran’s study “Deobandiism in the Punjab,” Deobandiism (and Wahhabiism) is an urban phenomenon. If so, then the existence of these militant outfits in rural Punjab indicates a new social trend. Perhaps, due to greater access to technology (mobiles, television sets, satellite receivers, etc), the landscape (and rustic lifestyles) of Punjab’s rural areas has changed. There is an unplanned urbanisation of the rural areas due to the emergence of small towns with no social development, health and education infrastructure. Socially and politically, there is a gap that is filled by these militant outfits or related ideological institutions.
Fortunately, they have not succeeded in changing the lifestyles of the ordinary people. This is perhaps because there are multiple cultural strands that do not allow the jihadis to impose their norms the way they have in the tribal areas or the Frontier province. This is not to say that there is no threat from them in South Punjab: the liberalism and multi-polarity of society is certainly at risk. The threat is posed by the religious seminaries and the new recruits for jihad, who change social norms slowly and gradually. Sadly nothing, including the powerful political system of the area, which in any case is extremely warped, helps ward off the threat of extremism and jihadism. Ultimately, South Punjab could fall prey to the myopia of its ruling elite.
* * *
So how does the state and society deal with this issue?
Deploying the military is not an option. In the Punjab this will create a division within the powerful army because of regional loyalty. The foremost task is to examine the nature of the state’s relationship with the militants as strategic partners: should this relationship continue to exist to the detriment of the state? Once this mystifying question is resolved, all militant forces can be dealt with through an integrated police-intelligence operation.
This, however, amounts to winning only half the battle. The other half deals with the basic problems faced by the likes of those young jihadis-in-training from Bahawalpur who said, “We don’t see anything” in our futures. Presently, there is hardly any industrialisation in South Punjab and the mainstay of the area, agriculture, is faltering. The region requires economic strengthening: new ideas in agriculture, capital investment and new, relevant industries. This is the time that the government must plan beyond the usual textile and sugar industries that have arguably turned into huge mafias that are draining the local economy rather than feeding it.
Investment in social development is desperately needed. A larger social infrastructure that provides jobs and an educational system that is responsive to the needs of the population can contribute to filling the gaps. The message of militancy is quite potent, especially in terms of the dreams it sells to the youth, such as those disillusioned boys from my village. Jihad elevates youngsters from a state of being dispossessed to an imagined exalted status. They visualise themselves taking their places among great historical figures such as Mohammad bin Qasim and Khalid bin Waleed. It is these dreams for which the state must provide an alternative.
http://www.newslinemagazine.com/2009/09/terror%E2%80%99s-training-ground/2/
ジン
カーテン
カラーリング
一番品質 シャンデリア 3灯 ハムレット [HAMLET] ディクラッセ[DI ClASSE] LP3057 [ペンダントライト ペンダントランプ 照明 天井照明 リビング ダイニング シンプル ナチュラル 子供部屋