The powerful Sipah-e-Sihaba: PPP and PML-N rush to shower privileges on Ali Raza’s family
What about thousands of Shia and Ahmedi Muslim families?
By Omar Khattab in Islamabad
Ali Raza was killed during the ethnic violence in Kyrgyzstan. The government of Pakistan did well by bringing his body to Pakistan and then taking it to his hometown Shorkot where he was buried. That should have been the end of the matter.
But things changed all of sudden when the funeral prayers of Ali Raza were led by no less than Mullah Ahmed Ludhianvi, the chief of the mother of all terrorism in Pakistan: the banned Sipa-e-Sihaba. Once TV channels showed that the most feared man in Pakistan had led the prayers, Prime Minister Yousuf Gillani sent an MNA to Shorkot with bags of money and an announcement of a host of privileges for the families of the deceased. Not to be left behind, PML-N, which is actually a coalition partner of the Sipa-e-Sihaba in Jang, sent its leaders with a list of privileges to outnumber the ones offered by the prime minister.
Ali Raza was killed in Kyrgyzstan, but his family was accorded bounty as if he was killed as a result of Pakistani government’s negligence. Even in one’s death one is almighty if one belongs to a terrorist organization like the Sipa-e-Sihaba.
Mullah Ahmed Ludhianvi has officially been banned from taking part in any activity where he can incite people’s passions against the communities like the Shia and Ahmedi Muslims and the Christians. But he openly takes part in politics in the company of Punjab’s law Minister Rana Sana. The PML-N is the political face of the Sipa-e-Sihaba. Thus if a Muslim leaguer is openly supportive of the Sipa-e-Sihaba, it is understandable in a highly criminalized society like Pakistan. But what about the PPP, the party of the poor and the progressive?
Only weeks before 94 Ahmedi Muslims were killed by the Sipa-e-Sihaba’s suicide bombers, but no compensation was made to them. Last year the Sipa-e-Sihaba and PML-N joined hands in burning down a Christian village in Gojra and killing dozens of Christians. No compensation was made and no criminals nabbed. The Shia holocaust has been going on over two decades thanks to the Pakistan Army, the PML-N, and a host of Islamofascist parties, but never ever compensation was made to a Shia family which lost a son, a father, a mother, a bread winner, a toddler. No one has ever been indicted for encouraging the Shia holocaust. The Sipa-e-Sihaba leaders, backed by other Wahabi and Deobandi outfits, have given fatwas inciting and justifying the killing of the Shias, but no one, even the PPP, has ever taken action against them. The Wahabi/Deobandi leaders openly quote an infamous fatwa which says: If a dog eats from your plate you can still eat from it. But if a Shia touches your plate it becomes haram.
Has anyone—media, politicians, Supreme Court, Human Rights Commission of Pakistan—ever condemned this fatwa? Backed by Saudi Arabia’s petrodollar and Pakistan Army’s weapons and training plus a supportive judiciary, the Sipa-e-Sihaba is untouchable.
Such is the power of the Sipa-e-Sihaba.
sadly Ali Raza funeral is even bigger tragedy then his killing .
Thanks Omar Khattab for such a superb article !
More than 100 Ahmadis were butchered by the worst of all humans, i.e. Taliban. Did any single notable person from the PPP or PML-N visit their families or participate in their funerals?
Shame on the mullah raj in Pakistan. The implicit and explicit (ugly) tentacles of the Sipah-e-Sahaba, Taliban and Jamaat-e-Islami are dug deep into every institution in the land of the pure.
We need to ask only one question today from every Pakistani. “Are you with the Taliban and Sipah-e-Sahaba or against them?”
What a joke that Aal-e–Saud and Saudi Muttawwa Abd-al-Aziz ibn Abd-Allah ibn Baaz issued a Fatwa of Takfeer [Apostasy] against Saddam Hussein [that too after he was no more of any use to Corrupt Aal-e-Saud and Wahhaabi Muttawwas whereas an Anarchist Pakistan Ahl-e-Hadith Scholar Late. Ehsan Elahi Zaheer [who was on the payroll of Aal-e-Saud and Saudi Muttawwas rather he was student of Salafi Islamic scholars such as Muhammad Nasiruddin al-Albani and Abd-al-Aziz ibn Abd-Allah ibn Baaz] had addressed Sddam Hussein and his Ba’ath Party Member [as per Saudi Fatwa “Apostate, Secular, Socialist i.e. KAAFIR] REFERENCE: Ehsan Elahi Zaheer URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P68GstP37go
Corrupt, Vile & Filthy: Arabs, Aal-e-Saud, & Wahhaabis.
http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2010/06/corrupt-vile-filthy-arabs-aal-e-saud.html
Great article Omar Khattab. May Allah bless you for bringing the facts to the masses who are deceived by these mullahs. Why do n’t people consider the Quranic verdict that any one who kills a person is like the whole mankind is killed and saving one life is saving the whole mankind. We should denounce the intolerant views of Mullahs. Thanks.
Dear, that is superb article. you make it a slap on the face of those who not only brutes but openly backed by brutes. Coercion will disappear ….. one day. but we should do our speak up to show hatered about coercion.
For some time the reports of contacts between a political party and a militant outfit has been surfacing in the news. I believe this demands serious attention. We have already lost lives due to the activities of such outfits and now the economical damages due to it have deepened. The army has rightly signaled about a possible operation in southern Punjab also.
Amir Mughal would have been a big Scholar, had he gave same passion to the study of Quran and Sunnah as he is passionate for collecting and posting Fatttwas…
Leading a funeral can be a crime or terrorism?
This is the extreme of madness…….
read this link
http://smkashif.blog.com/2010/06/18/%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A7-%D8%AB%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%DB%81%D8%8C-%D8%B3%D9%84%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%AB%DB%8C%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%88%D8%B1-%D9%82%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%AF%D9%85-%D8%AA/
How come I am related with Taseer and since you have mentioned Collection of Fatawa and being Scholar [I didn’t ever claim that I am an Scholar], now read a book compiled by Deobandis on Mawdudi and his Rafizi Brother Khomeini [do read Mawdudi’s Corrupt Manhaj and Corrupt belief and hypocrisy of Jamat-e-Islami]
For example Khomeini once made a statement which was published in the Tehran times (Kitaab be Noujawanaan – P8) that if he conquers Madina Munawwarah, he will remove the two idols (Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (May Allah be pleased with them) besides Prophet Mohammad (Peace be upon him). I am certain that no believer will accept such a statement against the great luminaries of Islam. Brother Amin, are we then to condemn only Khomeini and condone Mawdudi knowing well that Mawdudi was a close friend of Khomeini and was sympathetic to his course. In a book titled, ‘Two brothers – Maududi and Khomeini’ page 129, the following statement of Dr Ahmad Farouk Maududi (son of Abul-A’ala Maududi) was published in Roz Naame, Lahore – 29 September 1979, “Allama Khomeini had a very old and close relationship with Abba Jaan (father). Aayaatullah Khomeini translated his (fathers) books in Farsi and included it as a subject in Qum. Allama Khomeini met my father in 1963 during Hajj and my father’s wish was to create a revolutionary in Pakistan similar to Iran. He was concerned about the success of the Iranian revolution till his last breath.’
Read A book mentioned below to know as to what kind of Filthy Language Mawlana Mawdudi and his brother Khomeini used against Prophets [PBUT] and against the Companions [May Allah be pleased with everyone of them] of Prophet Mohammad [PBUH]. The book has provided the original quotes from Mawdudi’s book with the editions and page number. Mudodi Khumeni do bhai, Moudoodi and Khumeni [two Brothers http://www.scribd.com/doc/15702018/Mudodi-Khumeni-do-bhai-Moudoodi-and-Khumenishia-two-Brothers-a-deep-researc-book-by-Deoband-Ahlesunnat-wal-jamat
By the Grace of Allah I know enough Quran and Hadith to present myself [a mortal sinner] before Allah. I don’t need this Tag of Scholar to know basic beliefs of Islam. People like you need crutches [Baysakihyan] of Ulemaa-e-Kiram whereas Prophet Mohammad [PBUH] left enough for Ummah guidance i.e. Quran, Sunnah, Ahl Al Bay and Sihaba Kiram {Muslim, Bukhari, Mawatta Imam Mali, Musnad Ahmed Bin Hanbal and Mustadrak Al Hakim} [Mullahs aren’t mentioned anywhere]
Now read what our leading “Deobandi Scholars” do:
What I have learned through different sources that these Deobandis and Barelvis are basically the same with minor differences they both allegedly follow the Fiqh [Attributed to Imam Abu Haneefah] Hanafi and his followers and books these Deobandi and Barelvi read, quotes of which are as under:
Radd al-Muhtar ala ad-Dur al-Mukhtar is a book on Islam by 19th century Hanafi Scholar Ibn Abidin. A commentary on Imam al-Haskafi’s Durr al-Mukhtar, it is commonly known as Radd al-Muhtar. It is said to be a compilation of the great Fatwas of Imam Abu Hanifa [May Allah have mercy on his soul], and Hidayah is the name of a famous Hanafi juridical work by Burhan-ud-din Ali bin Abi Bakr al-Marghinani (1152-1197) which is considered widely authoritative as a guide to Fiqh amongst Muslims in Central Asia, Afghanistan and India, and is the basis for much of the Anglo-Islamic law in India and Pakistan.
Now read the excerpts from these two Books through which Deobandi and Barelvi Calamity in Pakistan want to Implement Islamic Law. Rampant Lal Mosque Anarchist, Binori Town, Madressah Haqqania, Talibans and other such Anarchist called these perversions mentioned below The Islamic Law!
“QUOTE”
1 – Be the curse of Allah be on those who reject Imam Abu Hanifa (Muqadimah dar Mukhtar)
2 – When The Prophet Issa [Jesus – PBUH] will come back he will follow the Madhab [Fiqh] of Abu Hanifa (Muqadimah dar Mukhtar)
3 – Khidr spent 30 years to learn knowledge from Abu Hanifa, then Qushayri learnt from Khidr during 3 years and he wrote more than 1000 books and put them in a box in the sea. When Isa aley salam will take these books and act upon them. (Muqadimah dar Mukhtar)
3 – Is someone pays a woman to do zina [adultery] , there is no hadd [no punishment] ( Dar Mukhtar, kitab Hudud, fatawa khaniyah misr vol 3 p 508, kanz daqaiq ed deoband p 180, and this fatwa is attributed to Imam Abu Hanifa while his two students say there is hadd [Adultery Law]. It is well known that the hanafi books of fiqh there is no Chain of Narration [isnad] to their Imam)
4 – The salary of the prostitute is halal [lawful] (Chalpi shara Wiqayah)
5 – If he pays a woman to do zina or wati [Adultery or Intercourse] or if he says I will give you so much dirham or she says give me so much, there is no had [no punishment under Adultery Law] (Alamgiri, vol 2 p 168)
6 – If someone does jima [intercourse] with an animal or with a dead or a young girl and there is no inzal [ejaculation] , then ghusl [bathe] is not wajib [obligatory] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab taharah, masail ghusl, aussi Alamgiri, Kitab taharah)
7 – If someone does sodomy with a woman who fasts or a man who fasts, their fast is not broken (Hidayah, Kitab Sawm)
8 – If a young boy of 10 does Jima [intercourse] with a balighah [adult] Woman, there is no Ghusl [bathe]( Alamgiri Kitab taharah)
9 – If someone enters his penis in his dubur (anus), then ghusl is not obligatory (Dar Mukhtar Kitab taharah Masail Ghusl)
10 – If a man in his dubur [anus] or a woman in her vagina enters the penis of the dead, or his finger, or wood, there is no ghusl [bathe](Hidayah Kitab Taharah)
11 – If someone enters the penis of an animal in her vagina or dubur [anus], the ghusl [bathe] is not wajib [obligatory] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab Taharah Masail Ghusl)
12 – If someone enters the penis of a boy without desire in her vagina or dubur [anus], the ghusl [bathe] is not wajib [obligatory] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab taharah Masail Ghusl)
13 – After doing Jima [Intercourse] with a young girl, it is not necessary to clean his penis (Dar Mukhtar Kitab taharah Masail Ghusl)
14 – If someone does jima [intercourse] with a virgin and the maidenhead is not broken, ghusl [bathe] is not wajib [obligatory] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab taharah Masail Ghusl)
15 – If someone does wati [intercourse] in the dubur [have anal sex or commit bestiality] of an animal or in his anus and there is no inzal, then Ghusl [bathe] is not wajib [obligatory] (Hidayah kitab taharah)
16 – If the balighah woman [adult woman] does wati [intercourse] with a young boy or with a crazy, then the woman has no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)
17 – If someone does wati [intercourse] with a non balighah woman [non adult woman], or with a dead or an animal, there is no hadd [punishment] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)
18 – If someone does zina [adultery] with the salve of his child or great child, there is no hadd (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)
19 – If someone does zina [adultery] with the slave of grand father or grand mother, there is no Hadd [Punishment for Adultery](Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)
20 – If someone has a slave in rahn (security for loan) and he does zina [adultery], there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)
21 – If someone does nikah [Marriage] with a mahram [sister, mother or daughter or real blood aunt] for ever woman and consider it halal [lawful], there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery](Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)
22 – The woman that are for ever forbidden, and he does nikah and he even if he considers that haram [Unlawful] , there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud, et Alamgiri who attribute that to Imam Abu Hanifa)
23 – If he does nikah [marriage] with a woman and joins in nikah his wife’s sister or mother, there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Alamgiri)
24 – If he does temporary marriage [Muta’ah] and he considers that haram [Unlawful], there is no hadd [[Punishment for Adultery] (Alamgiri)
25 – If someone does nikah with a woman who is married before, and he knows she has a husband and it is haram [Unlawful] , there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] Fatawa Khaniya misr vol 3 p 508)
26 – There is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] of zina [Adultery] for the one who cannot speak, neither any hadd [Punishment for Adultery] for something else, even if the witness are present and he admits with isharah [gesture] or by writing (Alamgiri misr, vol 2 p 168)
27 – If someone kidnaps a slave, does zina [Adultery] and pay his responsible [Owner] for her price, there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)
28 – If someone gives permission to another to do zina [Intercourse] with his slave, there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Alamgiri vol 2 p 169)
29 – If the Khalifah or the imam or the king does zina [ADULTERY] there is no hadd [PUNISHMENT] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud) [also in Hidaya and that Hidaya is being taught in Pakistani Madressah]
30 – There is no hadd for sodomy [Anal Intercourse] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)
31 – If someone does zina [ADULTERY] in dar ul harb [Land/Country of Infidels] or in the land of revolted people, there is no hadd [PUNISHMENT] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)
32 – The muslim can take riba [Interest] from a Infidel, in dar ul harb [Land/Country of Infidels] (Dar Mukhtar vol 4 p 209)
33 – This is also true for the one who becomes muslim and does not do Hijrah, whe can take riba from him( Dar Mukhtar vol 4 p 210)
34 – If someone prays holding a dog in his hands, his prayer is not fasid [INVALID] (Dar Mukhtar misr vol 1 p 153)
35 – If someone in prayer watches the private part of a woman, his prayer [Salat] is not broken [means it will remain valid] ( Maraqi Al falah misr vol 1 p 200)
36 – If someone watches at book of fiqh during prayer, is prayer is not broken. (Alamgiri vol,1 p 106)
37 – If someone prays and holds the Quran and reads from it, is prayer is fasid [Invalid] (Dar Mukhtar vol 1 p 641)
38 – If in the conditions of Imam in the first cases there is equality, then The one whose wife is more beautiful ( Dar Mukhtar vol 1 p 412)
39 – Then the one who has the biggest head and the shortest member [Penis](Dar Mukhtar vol 1 p 412)
40 – The meaning of member is penis (Rad Mukhtar Sharh Dar Mukthar, p 413)
41 – The one who does watch the vagina of a woman in a miror or in water, then the mother of this woman is forbidden to him (Dur Mukhtar, Kitab Nikah, fasl fil Muharamat)
“UNQUOTE”
I don’t need this tag of Aalim in presence of Justice Taqi Usman and Rafi Usmani [Both Deobandis] who have declared “Sood – Interest – Riba” A Halal by giving it a name of Islamic Banking and now read same Deobandis issue Fatwa against Deobandis:
Islamic banking, TV channels against Shariah, declare religious scholars Saturday, August 30, 2008 News Desk [The News International/Jang published the news and later removed it]
RAWALPINDI: Describing the existing Islamic banking by any name as against the Shariah and forbidden, religious scholars belonging to Fiqhi Majlis, Karachi, have decreed that banks working in the name of Islamic banking are not different from other banks and dealing with them is illegitimate.
The decree was issued in a meeting at the Jamia Farooqia in Shah Faisal Colony chaired by Maulana Salimullah Jan, President of Tanzeematul Madaris and Wafaqul Madaris, and attended by reputed religious scholars from all over the country. The meeting also discussed in detail the status of Islamic television channels in accordance with the Shariah and described their research and experiences in the light of questions and problems received at their respective centres. Some scholars also presented their research papers in this regard.
On the occasion, Maulana Salimullah Jan said that the religious scholars were contacting banks that had been claiming to practice Islamic banking and did research on the prevailing banking practices in the light of the Holy Quran and Sunnah. He said they also held meetings with modern economic experts. He said after detailed consideration, the scholars unanimously declared the Islamic banking and television channels as illegitimate. The scholar also said the kinds of pictures of a living being so far introduced were liable to be dealt with in accordance with the religious commandments. He said the launching of any type of television channel or participation in any television programme declaring it was needed for preaching had also been declared illegitimate. He said the scholars appealed to the Muslims to avoid television like other deeds forbidden by the Shariah.
The participants of the meeting included Mufti Abdul Hameed Deenpuri (Jamia-al-Aloom Islamia, Banori Town), Mufti Habibullah Sheikh (Jamia Islamia, Clifton), Mufti Rafiq Ahmed and Mufti Saif Alam (Banori Town), Mufti Abdullah (Khairul Madaris, Multan), Mufti Ghulam Qadir (Darul Aloom Haqqani, Akora Khattak), Mufti Ahmed Mumtaz (Jamia Khulafa-e-Rashdeen, Karachi), Mufti Zarwali Khan (Jamia Ahsan-al-Aloom), Mufti Ehteshamul Haq (Jamia Rasheedia, Turbat, Mekran), Maulana Saeed Ahmed Jalalpuri (Alami Majlis Khatam-e-Nabuwwat), Maulana Dr Manzoor Ahmed Mengal (Jamia Farooqia), Mufti Hamid Hassan (Darul Aloom, Kabirwala), Mufti Abdul Ghaffar (Jamia Ashrafia, Sukkur), Mufti Saaduddin (Jamia Ilmia, Lakki Marwat), Mufti Gul Hassan (Jamia Rehmia, Sarki Road, Quetta), Mufti Rozi Khan (Darul Afta Rahania, Quetta), Mufti Qazi Salimullah (Darul Huda, Khairpur), Nazir Ahmed Shah (Jamia Farooq-e-Azam, Faisalabad), Mufti Saeedullah (Jamia Arabia Naeemul Islam, Quetta), Mufti Samiullah (Jamia Farooqia), Mufti Ahmed Khan and others.
Justice Taqi Usmani and Rafi Usmani’s Publication House “Daarul Ishaat” publish such filthy books and earn million. Aamaal-e-Qur’aani, p. 134 by Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi [published by Jasim Book Depot, Urdu Bazaar, Jama Masjid, Delhi] The book and other books used by Deobandis and Barelvi book Shama Shabistan-e-Raza by Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi have many Chilla, Wazeefa and Black Magic Tricks and Taweez Ganda through using Quran [I have read every single one of them] and for Magic following is the Punishment as per Islamic Law.
Do you know the penalty of practicing Black Magic/Sorcery as per Islam? Mullahs issue Fatwa of Murder from Pulpit whereas practicing Magic is punishable by Death in Islam.
I wonder have you read Deobandi’s Magic Books e.g. Aaml-e-Qurani/Beheshti Zewar, Maktoobat-e-Biyaz Yaqoobi etc. or Barelvi Magic Book name Shama Shabistan-e-Raza by Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi.
I wont quote Fatwa of Mullahs but commandment from Prophet Mohammad [PBUH]
“The hadd (prescribed punishment) for the practitioner of magic is a blow with the sword (i.e., execution).” (Sunnan Tirmidhi, Daaraqutni, Mustadrak al-Haakim, Sunan al Bayhaqi]
Here goes your “Wishful Thinking about These Scholars [Ulemay Kiram] who are indulged in Haram of worst kind”
Time for you to cry on Blasphemy uttered by Deobandi Mullahs in their filthy books.
Do not try to understand the Qur’ân ever. Else, you will go astray. Fifteen “Uloom” (sciences) are required to understand the Book. (“Maulana” Zakaria Kandhalwi, Fazael Amaal, p.2)
Do not read the Qur’ân with understanding, you will go astray. (Fazaael Aamal, “Maulana” Ashraf Ali Thanwi, p. 216)
It is mentioned in Aamaal-e-Qur’aani, p. 134 by Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi [published by Jasim Book Depot, Urdu Bazaar, Jama Masjid, Delhi] that if a woman has excessive menstrual bleeding, the verse (Surah Al-’Imran: 3:144) should be written on three different pieces of paper, one tied on her right and the other on her left and the third piece of paper with the Qur’ânic verse to be hung below the naval. This verse of the Qur’aan, “Muhammad (sallallahu alaihe wa-sallam) is no more than a Messenger, and indeed (many) Messengers have passed away before him. If he dies or is killed, will you then turn back on your heels (as disbelievers)? And he who turns back on his heels, not the least harm will he do to Allah, and Allah will give reward to those who are grateful.” [Surah Al-‘Imran: 3:144]
The holy messenger came to Shah Waliullah (in the 18 century!) and said, “Why do you worry? Your children are the same as mine.” (Ashraf Ali Thanwi, Hikayat-ul-Awlia)
The prophet laid the foundation of Darul-Uloom, Deoband, India (in the 19th century) He comes to check accounts of the school. He has learnt the Urdu language. (Mubasshirat-e-Darul Uloom, and Deoband Number of the Darul-Uloom)
When Shah Waliullah was in his mother’s womb, she said a prayer. Two tiny hands (too) appeared for prayer. She was frightened. Her husband said, “You have Qutubul-Aqtab (Wali of Walis) in your womb (Hikayat-e-Awlia, p. 17 Ashraf Ali Thanwi) What a break-through!
The prophet laid the foundation of Darul-Uloom, Deoband, India (in the 19th century) He comes to check accounts of the school. He has learnt the Urdu language. (Mubasshirat-e-Darul Uloom, and Deoband Number of the Darul-Uloom)
Dil aur Jigar Tham kar parh lijay:
The advent of another Prophet is quite possible. (Mulla Abdul Hai Farangi Mahli and Mulla Qasim Nanotwi, Tahzeer-in-Nas, p.34, Athar Ibn Abbas, p.16) Why blame Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani only?
Risala Tazkara of Darul-uloom Deoband of 1965 claims: Anyone suffering from malaria who took dust from the grave of “Maulana” Yaqoob Nanotwi and tied this dust to his body, found instant relief.
Allaah cuts jokes with the Ulama of Deoband. One of them went to a well for “Wudu” (Ablution) He lowered the bucket in the well. It came back full of silver. The Holy man said to Allaah: Don’t kid around! I am getting late for prayers. He lowered the bucket in again and this time it came back full of gold. (Risala Tazkara of Darul-uloom Deoband of April 1965)
Amir Mughal would have been a big Scholar, had he gave same passion to the study of Quran and Sunnah as he is passionate for collecting and posting Fatttwas… I think he “Farig Tareen”
Will he give just 1% of his research time to know the reality of current PPP…
The Party which was supposed to be a ideological party is now have ideology but a history of curaption….
My Question is that can Leading a funeral be a crime or terrorism?
This post is the extreme of madness…….
read this link, and reply on the following
http://smkashif.blog.com/2010/06/18/%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A7-%D8%AB%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%DB%81%D8%8C-%D8%B3%D9%84%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%AB%DB%8C%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%88%D8%B1-%D9%82%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%AF%D9%85-%D8%AA/
Every politician has two faces, one when he being showed in out of government and other shows when he was being in government. But unfortunately, sharif brothers have many faces, on every occasion he shows one different. Only Bhutto’s were one face if they would be in government or in opposition. Pakistan is only of Bhutto, Pakistan of Quaid Azam and Allama Iqbal was buried in 1971 by Pakistani general Yehya and their Colleagues.
Molvies and their companion has no right to say that this is our Pakistan they are living in Bhutto’s country, if who can live and serve to Pakistan who is lover of Bhutto and their workers. Not my mean is that they can’t live there but they can’t say that we shall govern the Pakistan’s government. Zardari have to govern all life as a one political worker and followers of Bhutto’s, not a commander, only commanders are Pakistan peoples party workers and Bhutto workers. Belawal have only right for government because his grandfather made this country and their mother save it.
Dear Kashif Sahab,
You are lecturing me to read Quran and Sunnah now read what “The Great Mullahs Imams” are saying rather advising to not to read Quran.
Do not try to understand the Qur’ân ever. Else, you will go astray. Fifteen “Uloom” (sciences) are required to understand the Book. (“Maulana” Zakaria Kandhalwi, Fazael Amaal, p.2)
Do not read the Qur’ân with understanding, you will go astray. (Fazaael Aamal, “Maulana” Ashraf Ali Thanwi, p. 216)
Now Read What the Real Imams have to say about “Blindly Following the Mullahs”, they have restrained us to blindly following them so why we should follow present day Mullahs.
Linguistically, taqleed means: Placing something around the neck, which encircles the neck. Technically it means: Following he whose sayings is not a proof (hujjah).
Exlcuded from our saying, “following he whose saying is not a proof” is: following the Sunnah of the Prophet (SAW).
“Indeed the people of Truth and the Sunnah do not follow anyone [unconditionally] except the messenger of Allaah SAW, the one who does not speak from his desires – it is only revelation revealed to him.” [by Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyah, Majmoo’ah al-Fataawaa, vol 3, page 216, Daar Ibn Hazm Print, Trans: Aboo ‘Abdis-Salaam]
يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُواْ أَطِيعُواْ اللّهَ وَأَطِيعُواْ الرَّسُولَ وَأُوْلِي الأَمْرِ مِنكُمْ فَإِن تَنَازَعْتُمْ فِي شَيْءٍ فَرُدُّوهُ إِلَى اللّهِ وَالرَّسُولِ إِن كُنتُمْ تُؤْمِنُونَ بِاللّهِ وَالْيَوْمِ الآخِرِ ذَلِكَ خَيْرٌ وَأَحْسَنُ تَأْوِيلاً
Interpretation of the Meaning:
O you who believe! Obey Allâh and obey the Messenger (Muhammad SAW), and those of you (Muslims) who are in authority. (And) if you differ in anything amongst yourselves, refer it to Allâh and His Messenger (SAW), if you believe in Allâh and in the Last Day. That is better and more suitable for final determination. [The Noble Qur’an 4:59]
Abu Haneefah (d. 150H) (rahimahullaah) said: “Adhere to the athar (narration) and the tareeqah (way) of the Salaf (Pious Predecessors) and beware of newly invented matters for all of it is innovation” [Reported by As-Suyootee in Sawn al Mantaq wal-Kalaam p.32]
Ibn al-Qayyim said,
” And it is as Abu Umar (ibn Abdul Barr) said: Indeed, the people do not differ about the fact that knowledge is the realisation attained from proof, but without proof, it is only taqleed.”
Ibn al-Qayyim said,
“There are three sayings about the permissibility of giving fatwaa based upon taqleed:
1) It is not permissible to give fatwaa based upon taqleed, because it is not knowledge; since issuing a fatwaa without knowledge is forbidden. This is the saying of most of the Hanbalee scholars and the majority of the Shaafi’iyyah.
2) That it is permissible with regards to himself, but it is not permissible to give a fatwaa to others based upon taqleed.
3) That it is permissible when there is a need for it, and there is no mujtahid scholar. And this is the most correct of the sayings and is what is acted upon.”‘
Imam Ibn Katheer, rahimahullaah, said:
“And what is apparent, and Allaah knows best, is that it is general for all those who are in authority (oolul-amr), from the rulers and the scholars.”
Shaykhul-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah said:
“This is why those who are in authority are of two groups: the scholars and the rulers. If they are upright, the people will be upright; if they are corrupt, the people will be corrupt.”
“It should be realised that the rulers are to be obeyed if they command what knowledge necessitates. So obedience to them follows on from obedience to the scholars. Indeed obedience is only in that which is good and that which is obligated by knowledge. So just as obedience to the scholars follows on from obedience to the Messenger, then obedience to the rulers follows on from obedience to the scholars.” [Imaam Ibn al-Qayyim, r.a.]
The Problem
“Blind” following refers to following a person (including self) when the instructions are clearly not in accordance with Qur’an and Sunnah. To do so is a form of shirk, because at its core is a denial of a part of the Revelation, and to deny a single ayat of Revelation is to deny it all.
Many muslims treat the noble Imaams (Imaam Shafii, Imaam Malik, etc.) as though their words are protected from error. For some people, the words of an Imaam are taken as “gospel” and followed exclusively (as if it were revelation). Even if a verse from the Quraan or an authentic saying of the Messenger is brought as an argument against what their chosen Imaam said, their followers forsake what Allah or the Messenger, saaws, said and follow their Imaams. This dangerous position leads to blind taqleed (following) of humans at the expense of revelation.
One such example of this is that Imaam Malik did not raise his hands during the takbeer
because they had been crippled to where he could not raise them as should be done in the salah. Muslims who choose to blindly follow Imaam Malik will not raise their hands during the takbeer, even though their is clear proof to do so. There are examples too numerous to list here, examples of senseless adherence to the ways or teachings of men, teachings that are contradictory to the proof.
Some muslims blindly follow modern leaders (such as W. Deen Mohammed, the Tableegh, or the highly deviating Imaam at the local masjid), even when the man calls the people to actions and beliefs that are clearly opposing Quran and Sunnah. Once again, this is an act of elevating a person’s words over the Speech of Allah (i.e. the Quran), if at any time we reject the clear revelation and instead act upon or embrace the contrary teachings of a person.
Just like we are to obey our parents unless they call us to the haram (prohibited), we may follow the guidance of men unless they call us to error.
This condition of ignorance and blind following was given by Revelation from Allah to the Messenger, Muhammed, saaws, who said:
Verily, Allah does not take away knowledge by snatching it from the people, but (this is done) by causing (the death) of the scholars until none of them is left alive. People would then appoint ignorant leaders for themselves who would be consulted in matters of religion and they would give Fatawas without knowledge, falling into misguidance and misguiding others. [Muslim].
Shaykhul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah, rahimahullaah, said:
“And the four Imaams, may Allaah be pleased with them, all forbade the people from blindly following them in all that they may say; and this was an obligation upon them [to do].”
Abu Haneefah (rahimahullaah) said:
“When a hadeeth is found to be saheeh, then that is my madhhab.” [Ibn ‘Aabideen in al-Haashiyah (1/63) and in his essay Rasm al-Mufti (1/4 from the Compilation of the Essays of Ibn ‘Aabideen), Shaikh Saalih al-Fulaani in Eeqaaz al-Himam (p. 62) and others. Ibn ‘Aabideen quoted from Sharh al-Hidaayah by Ibn al-Shahnah al-Kabeer, the teacher of Ibn al-Humaam]
“It is haram (prohibited) for someone who does not know my evidence to give fatwaa (verdicts) on the basis of my words.” Another narration adds, “… for we are mortals: we say one thing one day, and take it back the next day.” [Ibn ‘Abdul Barr in Al-Intiqaa’ fi Fadaa’il ath-Thalaathah al-A’immah al-Fuqahaa’ (p. 145), Ibn al-Qayyim in I’laam al-Mooqi’een (2/309), Ibn ‘Aabideen in his Footnoes on Al-Bahr ar-Raa’iq (6/293) and in Rasm al-Mufti (pp. 29, 32) & Sha’raani in Al-Meezaan (1/55) with the second narration. Similar narrations exist on the authority of Abu Haneefah’s companions Zafar, Abu Yoosuf and ‘Aafiyah ibn Yazeed; cf. Eeqaaz (p. 52). Ibn al-Qayyim firmly certified its authenticity on the authority of Abu Yoosuf in I’laam al-Mooqi’een (2/344).]
“When I say something contradicting the Book of Allah the Exalted or what is narrated from the Messenger (saaws), then ignore my saying.” [Al-Fulaani in Eeqaaz al-Himam (p. 50), tracing it to Imaam Muhammad and then saying, “This does not apply to the mujtahid, for he is not bound to their views anyway, but it applies to the muqallid.”]
Imaam Maalik ibn Anas (rahimahullaah) said:
“Truly I am only a mortal: I make mistakes (sometimes) and I am correct (sometimes). Therefore, look into my opinions: all that agrees with the Book and the Sunnah, accept it; and all that does not agree with the Book and the Sunnah, ignore it.” [Ibn ‘Abdul Barr in Jaami’ Bayaan al-‘Ilm (2/32), Ibn Hazm, quoting from the former in Usool al-Ahkaam (6/149), and similarly Al-Fulaani (p. 72)]
Imaam Shaafi’i (Rahimahullaah) said:
“The sunnahs of the Messenger of Allah (saaws) reach, as well as escape from, every one of us. So whenever I voice my opinion, or formulate a principle, where something contrary to my view exists on the authority of the Messenger of Allah (saaws), then the correct view is what the Messenger of Allah (saaws) has said, and it is my view.” [Related by Haakim with a continuous sanad up to Shaafi’i, as in Taareekh Dimashq of Ibn ‘Asaakir (15/1/3), I’laam al-Mooqi’een (2/363, 364) & Eeqaaz (p. 100).]
Ahmad ibn Hanbal (rahimahullaah) said:
“Do not follow my opinion; neither follow the opinion of Maalik, nor Shaafi’i, nor Awzaa’i, nor Thawri, but take from where they took.” [Fulaani (p. 113) & Ibn al-Qayyim in I’laam (2/302).]
“Do not copy your Deen from anyone of these, but whatever comes from the Prophet (sallallaahu `alaihi wa sallam) and his Companions, take it; next are their Successors, where a man has a choice.”
“Following (ittibaa’) means that a man follows what comes from the Prophet (sallallaahu `alaihi wa sallam) and his Companions; after the Successors, he has a choice.” [Abu Daawood in Masaa’il of Imaam Ahmad (pp. 276-7)]
“The opinion of Awzaa’i, the opinion of Maalik, the opinion of Abu Haneefah: all of it is opinion, and it is all equal in my eyes. However, the proof is in the narrations (from the Prophet (sallallaahu `alaihi wa sallam) and his Companions).” [Reference: Ibn `Abdul Barr in Jaami’ Bayaan al-‘Ilm (2/149).]
“Whoever rejects a statement of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu `alaihi wa sallam) is on the brink of destruction.” [Ibn al-Jawzi (p. 182)2)]
Muslims should be obedient to their Imam except when given evidence that is clearly contrary to the Imam’s guidance on any particular matter. This evidence should be from the Qur’an and/or Sunnah, as explained by the righteous Islamic scholars of the first three generations of righteous muslims after the revelation of the Qur’an.
Sharh Usool ul-I’tiqaad (1/9) – Imaam al-Laalikaa’ee (d. 418H) (rh) said:
“That which is most obligatory upon a Muslim:
And among the mightiest of statements and clearest of proofs and understandings is:
1. The Book of Allaah, the Manifest Truth
2. Then the saying of the Messenger of Allaah
3. And of his Companions, the chosen, pious ones
4. Then that which the Salaf us-Saalih were unanimously agreed upon
5. The holding fast to all of that and remaining firm upon it till the Day of Judgement
6. Then turning away from the innovations and from listening to them – from amongst those things the astray people have invented”
Amir Mughal would have been a big Scholar, had he gave same passion to the study of Quran and Sunnah as he is passionate for collecting and posting Fatttwas… I think he “Farig Tareen Insaan”
Will he give just 1% of his research time to know the reality of current PPP…
The Party which was supposed to be a ideological party is now have ideology but a history of corruption….
My Question is that can Leading a funeral be a crime or terrorism?
This post is the extreme of madness…….
read this link, and reply on the following
http://smkashif.blog.com/2010/06/18/%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A7-%D8%AB%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%DB%81%D8%8C-%D8%B3%D9%84%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%AB%DB%8C%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%88%D8%B1-%D9%82%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%AF%D9%85-%D8%AA/
Deobandi Akaber or Tawaif (Small Video) (Rasheed Gangohi)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwBNPx7jBII
Pornography of Deobandi Leaders – 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PH3FjwuTycM&feature=related
Ugly Taqi Usmani Exposed!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUvnjQvOpl4&feature=related
Kya Ulmae Deoband Ahle Sunnat Hai? – 7/7(Urdu)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzmmmQxOEoo&feature=related
~SheikhTouseef-ur-Rahmaan~=Bashashti Zavir Ka Operation-1Of3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzV-St4hYCU&feature=related
Awesome article post.Really looking forward to read more.