Zakir Naik: Muslim preacher of hate is let into Britain – by David Leppard

Zakir Naik says the 9/11 attacks were an ‘inside job’ by the US

THE home secretary, Theresa May, is facing a stiff test of the Conservative party’s claims to oppose radical Islam after her officials chose to allow a misogynist Muslim preacher into Britain.

Zakir Naik, an Indian televangelist described as a “hate-monger” by moderate Muslims and one Tory MP, says western women make themselves “more susceptible to rape” by wearing revealing clothing.

Naik, who proselytises on Peace TV, a satellite television channel, is reported to have called for the execution of Muslims who change their faith, described Americans as “pigs” and said that “every Muslim should be a terrorist”.

In a recent lecture, he said he was “with” Osama Bin Laden over the attacks on “terrorist America”, adding that the 9/11 hijackings were an inside job by President George W Bush.

In opposition, David Cameron and other senior Tories led criticism of the Labour government for allowing radical preachers into Britain to stir up hatred on lecture tours. While in opposition, Cameron also campaigned to get Yusuf al-Qaradawi, an Egyptian radical, banned from Britain.

Cameron and May now face a political test over Naik, whose inflammatory comments have led some moderate Muslims to call him a “truth-twister”.

One well-placed insider said: “Zakir Naik is a nasty man who makes al-Qaradawi look like a participant at a teddy bears’ picnic. He shouldn’t be allowed into the country to stir up hatred.”

The Home Office indicated that it was not planning to ban Naik, however.

Although Naik makes it clear he does not support specific acts of terrorism, his inflammatory speeches have included one, currently on YouTube, in which he states: “Beware of Muslims saying Osama Bin Laden is right or wrong. I reject them … we don’t know.

“But if you ask my view, if given the truth, if he is fighting the enemies of Islam, I am for him.

“I don’t know what he’s doing. I’m not in touch with him. I don’t know him personally. If he is terrorising the terrorists, if he is terrorising America the terrorist … I am with him. Every Muslim should be a terrorist.”

According to reports in the Indian media, his organisation, the Islamic Research Foundation in Mumbai, was where Rahil Abdul Rehman Sheikh, suspected of being commander of a series of train bombings in Mumbai, and other alleged terrorists spent much of their time before the attacks.

The American terror suspect Najibullah Zazi, arrested last year for planning suicide attacks on the New York subway, is said to have been inspired by Naik’s YouTube videos. There is no suggestion Naik had any knowledge of terrorist plotting.

The UK Border Agency said: “Each case is considered on its own merits. When assessing a visa application, we will consider the previous conduct of the individual and we will ensure the UK does not provide a platform for the promotion of violent extremism.

“We reserve the right to revoke someone’s visa if they are found to be promoting extreme views which are contrary to UK values.”

Naik will be appearing at Wembley Arena in London and in Sheffield on his British tour. When he last came to Britain in 2006, his visit was condemned by David Davies, the Tory MP for Monmouth, who described him as a “hate-monger”.

A doctor by profession, Naik has distinguished himself from dozens of other “mad mullahs” through his intellect and his ability to recite verbatim extended sections of the Koran.

Peace TV has a huge following in the Muslim neighbourhoods of Mumbai, Naik’s native city. He has been named as the third most popular spiritual guru in India.

Last year he was ranked 82nd in a list of India’s most powerful people.

Since the 9/11 attacks, he appears to have developed a particular hatred of America. He is reported to have said: “The pig is the most shameless animal on the face of the Earth. It is the only animal that invites its friends to have sex with its mate.

“In America, most people consume pork. Many times after dance parties, they have swapping of wives. Many say, ‘You sleep with my wife and I will sleep with your wife’. If you eat pigs then you behave like pigs.”

Sermons of malice

“Western society has actually degraded [women] to the status of concubines, mistresses and social butterflies, who are mere tools in the hands of pleasure seekers and sex marketeers”

“People who change their religion should face the death penalty”

“It is a blatant secret that this attack on the twin towers was done by George Bush himself”

“If he [Osama Bin Laden] is terrorising the terrorists, if he is terrorising America the terrorist … I am with him. Every Muslim should be a terrorist”

Source: The Sunday Times, May 30, 2010

Zakir Naik’s views on Osama bin Laden, Islam and terrorism

25 responses to “Zakir Naik: Muslim preacher of hate is let into Britain – by David Leppard”

  1. Despicable interviewer, despicable interviewee:

    Will non-Muslims be granted basic human rights like freedom of speech, building their places of worship etc. in an Islamic State? Watch the question answered by world’s most dangerous hate preacher Dr. Zakir Naik

    Non-Muslims & Basic Human Rights? Zakir Naik
    Death Penalty for Apostates!

  2. According to some experts, while Al Qaida serves the armed segment of religious terror, Dr. Zakir Naik´s PeaceTV covers the media segment of the same agenda. For example, Dr. Zakir will first attract the attention of people towards his lectures by giving similarities between Islam and other religious beliefs, while at the next step, he comes up to prove all other religions to be fake and Holy Scriptures false through a number of programs like ´Crossfire´, ´Truth Revealed´ etc. Some even opine that, while Al Qaida´s existence is mostly in hidence, Zakir Naik is continuing his offensives openly, which is a much greater threat to global peace and harmony.

    In one of the programs on PeaceTV, Dr. Zakir Naik said in Urdu, Jesus Christ never claimed himself to be a Christian. And according to Zakir, Jesus was also a Muslim. By saying this, Dr. Zakir wanted to convince the audience that, there is no divine religion except Islam in this world, since the ancient times.

    Dr. Zakir Naik is gradually expanding his influence over a number of media bases in Europe, America and Asia. Recently in Glasgow [UK], a radio presentator named Rev. Mahboob Masih was sacked from a radio station named Awaz FM just because he his co-presenter Afzal Umeed were discussing the views of a prominent Muslim speaker, Zakir Naik, who the Rev Masih accuses of belittling the Christian faith on Peace TV, a digital channel.

    Later, Rev. Masih lodged a complaint with Ofcom, the radio regulator, claiming that Awaz FM is in breach of the terms of its license. It alleges “discrimination against members of Asian Christian Community by [the] Muslim management of Awaz FM.”

    Commenting on Dr. Zakir Naik, an eminent Indian sociologist Imtiaz Ahmed said, “Brought up on the heavy dose of Saudi Arabia-backed Salafist-Wahabi Islam, Naik follows a supremacist ideology. “The Saudis think they have a divine right to convert Muslims across the world into a puritanical Salafist Islam. Naik is their public face,”

    He said, “The exclusivist Wahabism is inimical to an inclusive, tolerant Islam practiced in India. I have heard him a couple of times on TV and am deeply disappointed.”

  3. This man is a pig. He once said that Yazid [He said Hazrat Yazid] was justified in killing Imam Hussain. This means he is financed by Saudi Arabia.

  4. He is a Bastard of unimaginable scale. excuse my language

  5. Zakir nair is a noble person. What ever he is stating correct truth nothing but truth. There is a time open your eyes. Otherwise judjement day is very near. Be aware ………….

  6. I don’t want to comment on the words that have been used by Zakir Saab on “Yajid”. But this is the day where muslims should come near to each other. Dont give a chance to enemy to divide us. We are muslims we should be brothers among us. Dont divide ourselves ………….. Dont divide…………

  7. After reading this article, I have received one more example of the double standards of these so called supporters of Freedom of Speech. The people who allow mocking of Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), disgusting movie on Holy Quran (The Last and final testament) and every tiny miny issue of Islam suddenly feel extremely offensive when knowledgeable Muslim scholars expose the western mentality and their glamorous but dark stained lifestyles.
    It is strange to see that the writer of this article hardly quoted any complete sentence of Dr. Naik saying what article claims he said. Picking Words, phrases and half sentences from here and there, mixing them together and quoting without any context have been the oldest and dirtiest strategies of article writers who have been well programmed by their western godfathers. The same strategy has been successfully played in this article as well. One of the easiest examples to point out from the same article is that writer alleges that Dr. Naik said that 9/11 was an inside job. However its an open challenge to the entire media world to present the original video of Dr. Naik saying the same. What actually he mentioned in his lectures “Is terrorism a muslim monopoly?”, “Media & Islam – War or Peace?” and others is some of the Americans themselves did not believe that Osama did 9/11 but the actual culprit is George Bush government itself. They did various investigation studies and presented their conclusions with due fact sheets and justifications as well.
    With regards to allegation that Dr. Naik said American women are easy targets of Rape, again it is not his own discovery. As per US Department of justice every 32 seconds a woman is being raped in America. The worst crimes against women like rape, murder, molestation, incest, pedophilia to name but a few are at the highest level in America. Take a glimpse of status of women in America.
    Fact #1: 17.6 % of women in the United States have survived a completed or attempted rape. Of these, 21.6% were younger than age 12 when they were first raped, and 32.4% were between the ages of 12 and 17. (Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women, Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey, November, 2000)
    Fact #2: 64% of women who reported being raped, physically assaulted, and/or stalked since age 18 were victimized by a current or former husband, cohabiting partner, boyfriend, or date. (Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women, Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey, November, 2000)
    Fact #3: The FBI estimates that only 37% of all rapes are reported to the police. U.S. Justice Department statistics are even lower, with only 26% of all rapes or attempted rapes being reported to law enforcement officials.
    Fact #4: The National College Women Sexual Victimization Study estimated that between 1 in 4 and 1 in 5 college women experience completed or attempted rape during their college years (Fisher 2000).
    Even now If you are not convinced with what Dr. Naik says about the lives of poor american woman please visit
    For the fact of pig eating habits of America, please read following article to keep the facts straight. It will enlighten you about 3 million swingers in America who are proudly engaged in swapping their spouses as part of their normal lifestyle.
    Sounds nasty? Yes It is. Not Naik but America is a nasty nation. The nation who first dropped a nuclear bomb on any country is America. The nation which tried to colonise entire world was Britain. The first illegal state created by force is Israel. Now you can decide who is terrorist and who is not. For such people only Bible says: Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged(Matthew 7:1).
    The writer of this article must have also written something on the sickness of double standards played by these western friends of ours who instead of countering Dr. Zakir’s remarks in open debate are crying like a bashful woman to ban him from the country. Common people are smart enough to understand the fact that be it any country, when it can defend Salman Rushdie, protect him on national level and criticise Muslims condemning his statements about Islam and Holy Prophet, his respected wives and companions in the name of Freedom of Speech and then talks about banning Dr. Naik to stop spreading hatred, what a dirty and biased mindset they have. Once they have done it(defending satanic Salman) they have lost all the rights to condemn anyone saying anything in the name of respecting people’s emotions.
    Had they been sincere enough in respecting people’s emotions, they would have not defended and nourished the Satanic Salman.
    As Quran states: “When Truth is hurled against falsehood, falsehood perishes. For falsehood by its nature bound to perish”(Surah Isra Chapter 17 verse 81). These callers of ban have no answers to the remarks of Dr. Naik whether it is pig eating habit and later behaving in same manner of what they eat or why should he call someone terrorist when Americans themselves do not believe it. They call Dr. Naik “Nasty” when he is just informing people about nasty things these westerners are doing all around.
    I recollect a quote from Holy Bible on this particular situation of these callers of ban on Dr. Naik in United Kingdom “You hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of your own eye; and then shall you see clearly to cast out the mote out of your brother’s eye”(Matthew 7:5).

  8. While one Yazid makes his way to the UK, another has been killed in Pakistan:

    Yazid: Qaeda moneyman who opposed 9/11

    Tuesday, 01 Jun, 2010

    KABUL: Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, the one-time Al-Qaeda banker and number three leader whose death was announced Tuesday, helped finance the September 11 hijackers but was reportedly opposed to the attacks.

    Yazid, Al-Qaeda’s leader in Afghanistan for the past three years, was a founder member of the terror network back in the late 1980s and a close confidante of Osama bin Laden.

    “Al-Masri was the group’s chief operating officer, with a hand in everything from finances to operational planning,” a US official said.

    “He was also the organisation’s prime conduit to bin Laden and (Al-Qaeda number two Ayman) Zawahiri,” he said. “He was key to Al-Qaeda’s command and control.”

    Yazid, 54, also known as Sheikh Said al-Masri, was on the list of individuals and organisations whose assets were frozen by the US Treasury in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States.

    According to the US Federal Bureau of Investigation, it was Yazid who transferred funds via Dubai for Mohammed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi and Wal al-Shehri, three of the hijackers who flew aircraft into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon.

    But the September 11 commission quoted sources as saying that Yazid, described as Al-Qaeda’s chief financial manager, had backed Taliban leader Mullah Omar in opposing the attacks “because he feared the US response.”

    The US official said Yazid was “widely viewed” as Al-Qaeda’s number three, although he does not figure on the FBI “10 most wanted terrorists” list or a State Department list of major terrorists with bounties on their heads.

    Yazid, also a member of Al-Qaeda’s Shura leadership council, appeared in a number of videos since he first emerged as the network’s chief in Afghanistan in May 2007, wearing thick glasses and a white turban.

    A former member of the Islamic Jihad movement in Egypt, he had close links with fellow Egyptian Zawahiri and is said to have served time in jail for conspiracy over the 1981 assassination of Egyptian president Anwar Sadat.

    According to Yasser al-Sirri, the director of the London-based Islamic Observatory, Yazid was born in December 1955 in Egypt’s Nile Delta region.

    Sirri told AFP at the time of Yazid’s video appearance in May 2007 that he was “trusted by bin Laden, for whom he ran businesses in Sudan” when the founder of Al-Qaeda lived in exile there before Khartoum expelled him in 1996.

    “Yazid is known for his integrity and management skills, but has never taken organisational or military responsibility at the heart of Al-Qaeda, of which he was one of the founders in 1989,” Sirri said.

    He was said to have replaced Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi, an Iraqi and high-ranking member of Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, whose arrest was announced by the United States in April 2007.

    Sirri, in an interview with the Washington Post several years ago, described Yazid as an amiable personality who is popular among Al-Qaeda’s core command, unlike Zawahiri, a more polarising figure.

    “If you meet him, you’d never believe he’s a militant,” Sirri was quoted as saying. “He’s a very, very quiet person.”

  9. How can this man be crticised? everything he says he references from quran and hadith, are you arguing that the quran and hadith are wrong? when reading about him, please watch his responses in full and not some words people quote out of context. this is the same thing the west does with the quran all the time.
    Regarding his comment on yazid- he apoligised and said it was a slip of the tongue, he has slipped up a few times and apoligised, he is only human, but does the islamic thing by apologising. So people still hating him should question their own intentions. Islam does not allow for this type of hatred. A hadith states that the prophet (pbuh) said one of the worst sins a muslim can commit is to attack another muslim or call a muslim a non muslim. In fact how many people here thinking they have the right to call him a non muslim woke up for fajr today?

    the west realised muslims had great advantage of begin strong; their faith so adopted a method for keeping the muslims down- divide and rule. and they have succeeded even though we have one book- the undisputed word of god we still find ways of hating each other and ignore what we share.

  10. Dr.Zakir asked all to read about the matter of 9/11 attack. Many American writers have written Books blaming President Bush who brought calamities in Iraq & Afghanistan. Dr Zakir is a preacher of plain truth , carries no hates against anyone.
    Thank You

  11. Campus Crusade for Christ has 25,000 full time employed missioneries around the globe, Billy and Franklin Graham preach Christianity and hate against Islam – does any body stop them from speaking? Yet when Dr Zakir calls others to Islam it is a crime, many Christians use the same stats about USA and its immorality as a nation, why do they get away with it???

  12. Dr Zakir Naik is a noble man, speaks truth from the Quran. If you can no digest the truth because you do not wish to leave your evil ways then it is up to you.

    Mr David metioned in his article.. Zakir Naik says the 9/11 attacks were an ‘inside job’ by the US
    Search on Youtube, you will find hundreds of videos from americans and europens who believe the same. US government could not provide sufficient evidence if it was done by any muslim or not.

    “In a recent lecture, he said he was “with” Osama Bin Laden over the attacks on “terrorist America”, adding that the 9/11 hijackings were an inside job by President George W Bush.”
    Why Should we think it was an inside job? US being so high tech could not trace the plane. I don’t support or hate Osama becuase first of all because i personally don’t know him to make comments about him and secondly no court in the world could prove that 9/11 was his job.

    “In America, most people consume pork. Many times after dance parties, they have swapping of wives. Many say, ‘You sleep with my wife and I will sleep with your wife’. If you eat pigs then you behave like pigs.”
    That is the reason non-muslims hate him when he tells you the truth. Don’t to go to clubs, drink alcohal, commits adultry with several women in your life, teenage pregnency rate is the highest in your side of the world, higher ratio of women being raped, married men seeking pleasure in strip clubs, highest divorse rates, and i can go on and on. If that has become a norm in your society or your forefathers did the same that does not mean you are on the right path. He is showing you the path of pride with honor and listen to him because that is common in every religion.

    “People who change their religion should face the death penalty”
    Of course its a law in Islam by God. You should listen to his reasoning before making your judgement

    “It is a blatant secret that this attack on the twin towers was done by George Bush himself”
    If non-muslims believe it’s Osamas job but you could not prove then muslims will only believe it’s mr bush attacking his own country. See on youtube and you will find your own academics, professionals, politicians saying the same thing.

    “If he [Osama Bin Laden] is terrorising the terrorists, if he is terrorising America the terrorist … I am with him. Every Muslim should be a terrorist”
    Funny how cleaverly you pick words out from the whole lecture you please your popularity. Listen to the full lecture and you will know the truth.

    My personal opinion is that he is the man of honor, a true scholar from all religious scriptures and able to debate with you from your own scriptures and give you a hard time on your believes becuase even you know inside you are on wrong side of the argument. You can not stop his true message just by stopping him coming to the uk but will anger other islamic scholars who will work more harder in western communities.

    I also read that british asian or muslim communities do not like him to come to england. What is your proof? You will bring up sam (who should be samiullah) or fati (who should be fatima) from the muslim communities. They dont even know how to pray or wash themselves and ashmed of their muslim names so much that they change it to suit thier livestyles. If you want to know islam then ask the learned person, scholars and those who follow – not the other way around.

    May God guides us all and give us the ability to see and follow the truth that is beneficial for us and our next generations.

  13. Dr Zakir Naik should first discuss with other Mawlvis to define as who will define the definition of Islam and Muslims and then he should preach.

  14. Aamir – do you really think molvis knows islam. They do know how to read the quran but how many of them even follow or preach to others? How many of their personal lives or knowledge influnced others to embrace Islam? I am not againt molvis as we also need them to lead the prayers but they are supposed to be role models is Islam being spiritual individauls. They are too busy making money from majid, saying khatams or dam or thinking the majid that only belongs to God is their personal property.. I met muslims who hide thier religion because they are scared that others may start calling them terrorists.. funny how they are ashmed of being muslims without knowing what a muslim is and his purpose. they should ashemd of not fulfiling the purpose of being a muslim rather than hiding themselves of being muslims..

  15. People modern days commit racism many ways yet calling “Human Rights”. While Presidents, Kings, Queens and Leaders think their professionals, hence don’t know simple logic and common sense .

  16. you keep taking things he said out of context if you write the full sentnce he said you will understand wht he is trying to say he doesnt promote terrorism at all

  17. Controversial Muslim televangelist Zakir Naik banned from Toronto conference Kathryn Blaze Carlson The National Post, Toronto

    An Indian Muslim televangelist who was banned from Britain last week for “unacceptable behaviour” will not be allowed into Canada to speak at an upcoming conference in Toronto, sources familiar with the situation have told the National Post.

    Dr. Zakir Naik, who has said “every Muslim should be a terrorist” and that Jews are “our staunchest enemy,” was to headline next month’s Journey of Faith Conference — which is billed as one of North America’s largest Islamic conferences and is expected to attract upward of 10,000 people.

    Dr. Naik, the Mumbai-based founder of Peace TV and a widely respected lecturer in India, has a laundry list of views that could have led to his exclusion from the U.K. and Canada, both of which require an Indian citizen to obtain a visitor visa.
    The 44-year-old medical doctor recommends capital punishment for homosexuals and the death penalty for those who abandon Islam as their faith.

    He has said that a man is within his right to beat his wife “lightly,” though in a July 2009 YouTube video he cautioned against hitting her on the face or leaving a mark. The “Keep Zakir Naik Out of Canada” Facebook group, which was launched over the weekend, also points out his view that western women make themselves “more susceptible to rape” by wearing revealing clothing.

    Among the chief reasons, British Home Secretary Theresa May decided to quash Dr. Naik’s U.K. speaking tour later this month, however, were comments he made in a widely circulated 2007 video.

    “If [Osama bin Laden] is fighting the enemies of Islam, I am for him … If he is terrorizing a terrorist, if he is terrorizing America the terrorist, the biggest terrorist, I am with him,” said Dr. Naik, who has delivered hundreds of talks in India, Canada, the U.S. and the Middle East. “Every Muslim should be a terrorist.”

    Tarek Fatah, founder of the Muslim Canadian Congress, said he and the congress have been informed that Dr. Naik will be “stopped at the airport,” and sources familiar with the situation confirmed Dr. Naik does not have a visa to enter Canada.
    “We are very happy that government agencies, having been made aware of his statements, have taken this decision,” Mr. Fatah said, adding that he sent a mass email to federal MPs last week, warning them of Dr. Naik’s views. “We certainly don’t want hate-mongers to come here.”
    “To me, the rules as to who can come into this country were written for this kind of person,” echoed Bernie Farber, CEO of the Canadian Jewish Congress. “The comments are highly inflammatory, and highly provocative. When you put them together in one cauldron, you have a stew of hatred.”

    Dr. Naik, president of the Islamic Research Foundation in Mumbai, was reached via email on Monday but would not comment on his pending visit to Toronto. In fact, Dr. Naik may not yet know that he is unwelcome in Canada, sources said.

    In his email to the National Post, Dr. Naik pointed to a June 20 statement regarding the “overzealous and islamophobic exclusion order” issued by the U.K. The statement seeks to clarify his comments, which the foundation argues were “taken out of context.”
    The Journey of Faith Conference is chaired by Imam Saed Rageah, whose Toronto mosque, the Abu Huraira Centre, made headlines last fall after a group of young worshippers vanished and were feared to have joined a Somali militant group. Imam Ragaeh declined an interview request yesterday, but passed along a web video via email of Dr. Naik defending his comments and promising to challenge the U.K. ban.

    According to the Journey of Faith event website, the “hope” of the July 2-4 conference at the downtown Metro Toronto Convention Centre is for Muslims to “renew their forgotten relationship” with the Quran. As of last night, the site still listed Dr. Naik as a featured speaker.
    Citizenship and Immigration Canada declined to comment on the case yesterday, citing the Privacy Act.

  18. That’s true what Dr. Naik says about American/western culture –dinking, rapes, swapping wives etc. But is it the real Islam to hate America? ‘Charity begins at home.’ Look what’s happening in Pakistan. Every other day there is some suicide attack on muslim or non-muslim communities. Innocent people dying everyday. The hypocrisy of these Mullahs is quite evident from two recent sucide attacks in Lahore. Nearly a month ago, 90 people were slaughtered in a mosque in Model town Lahore and those killed belonged to Ahmadi cast or Qadianis. Most of the Islamic religious parties showed no interest at the tragic incident. But, a naive politician Nawaz Sharif (perhaps for the first time) gave a reasonable statement on the tragedy: “Qadianis are our brothers and we share their grief.” This statement caused a storm in a calm dead sea of hypocite ‘ulemmas’ and they suggested that statement is an intrigue against Islam by standing by the ‘non-muslim’ Qadianis. Just imagine , how humanity evaporated from the ‘muslim ummah’. and now two days ago sunni muslims were killed in a suicide attack in Data Darbar, Lahore. Now all religious parties are ready to condemn the terrorists and assail them. These two incidents are great tragedies. But seldom a mullah thought of human beings being killed , rather they first inquire muslims have been killed or non-muslims then they decide whether to condemn the incident or just keep quiet. So the problem is not what Americans do and how they spend their lives, question is : would muslims be ever united and think about human beings first, and muslims second. Secondly, those terrorists who kill and plan the killing of innocent lives irrespective of the religion deserve the most hatred, not America. And world needs the same madness and conviction to kill the terrorists as they have so far demonstrated.

  19. Once somebody in the audience asked Dr. Zakir Naik about his amazing ability to quote simultaneously from different scriptures and Quran. He replied that it was an art. Don’t try to learn by heart different scriptures by following me by being impressed. I admire him for his truthful statement. So, it’s evident from the Dr. Naik’s live statement that it’s an ‘art’. No doubt, Dr. Naik is a master of ceremonies. He runs the show with great craft and ingenuity. He wins the hearts of nearly every kind of ‘muslim’, hardcore or moderate. His intelligence is evident in his arguments. But…….stop here and take a deep breath and let’s analyse his ‘great show’ rationally and with a common sense. As described earlier about his art, Dr. Naik comes up before the world as an artist (not scholar. Scholar is too heavy a word for him). He is merely a great show runner. In his lectures, he very cleverly parries all the conflicting arguments and questions about the recent state of terror and unrest caused by ‘muslims’ or foreign agents. He can’t say a bad word for Taliban or Usama Bin Laden because he also holds a great congregation of crowds _____ he is wise enough not to make enemies with Laden or other hardcore religious group lest he must go earlier to 72 hoors as a result of some suicide attack. That’s why his lecture is full of hatred for Americans (as every hardcore muslim is happy to hear that) while (for moderates) denying any personal connection with Usama by stating that he doesn’t know whether he’s good or bad guy. It’s so simple that there is no suicide bombings ever hitting his lecture auditoriums or crowds of people whom he befools. Because he must be the apple of all those religiously mad mullahs and terrorists’ eyes. Dr. Naik has become a kind of showbiz personality who is selling his art very successfully while least serving the world of Islam with any reasonalble philosophy about Islam. According to mullahs and him, Islam is just to pray five times (what we call namaz), fast (with long faces) and do Ummrahs and Hajj as many as you can, and don’t foget to hate America and the west. So, this is Islam.— end of the story.
    May God bestow some rationality in these self-proclaimed ‘ulemmas’ and ‘scholars’

  20. People who are against Dr. Zakir Naik & talk about freedom of speech, must first research, read & learn facts from about Quran & Islam, about self inflicting 911, Apartheid Zionist Israeli Jews Greater Israeli Agenda dictating & controlling USA government, Congress (Republicans & Democrats), Fedreral Reserve, Banks, Media, Defence Contractors, CIA. Besides there are many Christian Evangelists & preechers in USA who are supporters of Zionist State of Israel & give hate speeches against Islam & Muslameen & fund immigration to occupy Palestine like Christian Evagelists John Hagee Here is what he has to say about Bush & Iraq:
    John Hagee: Bush is the Messiah (2/4)
    It is freedom of speech even if you say against Prophets (Allah/God forbid) but does not go very far if you say against Holaucaust or not 6 million Jews were killed or Israel is all Anti-Semitic. You will be hunted down & brought to court because it is against Israel on occupied Palestine.

  21. aap choot ke baal hai janab bachke rahna koi cheel kar fek dega

    shakl se kana dajjal ho aap or key tarif karu

    aap choot ka pani ho

    aap land ke kabab ho

    aap chioot ke dhakkan ho

  22. Dr. Zakir Naik should never be allowed to speak & as a matter of fact, he should be expelled to UAE from where he is running his TV channel. He spreads message of hatred, does not propagate message to co-exist with other religions, runs open seminars to misinterpret versus from Vedas. If a hindu calls in thousands to people tomorrow to misinterpret & falsely propagate versus from Quran, he will be butchered by one of Naik’s followers.
    Zakir converts people from other religions to islam, but opposes muslim conversion to other religions. He makes fun of Lord Ganapati & questions his birth. If Muhommad can ride to see a girl with face of donkey, why can’t Lord Ganapati have a face of elephant? After all, this proves that these complicated surgeries were taken place in old days in India.
    People should ask the Indian Government to throw Zakir out of India.

  23. Asslam Alaikum,

    Those who love with true islam (Tawheed)and authentic saying of our beloved prophet, would be always with Dr. Zakir Naik not against him.

    May Allah increase in hidaya, make more steadfast, more brave & strong and save from evil people. (Ameen).