Babar Awan’s appearance in the Supreme Court and the silence of the Hizb ut-Tahrir lambs
We provide below an extensive report on Babar Awan’s appearance in the Supreme Court in the NRO case, providing a snapshot (from pkpolitics) of the mood (of the Ansar Abbasi led Hizbut-Tahrir mafia) before and after Awan’s appearance in the SC. Also provided are two articles written by Cyril Almeida and Tahir Sarwar Mir:
Before: The Forecasters
I bet you all Babar Awan will make personal attacks on Gen Kiyani and Chief Justice Iftikhar.
Zardari and Rehman Malik and Yusuf Raza Gilani has no credibility, and I think if Babar Awna refused to write a letter to Swiss Courts, then Chief Justice Iftikhar should send HIM (Babar Awan) to Adiala Jail straight away. Also making sure that no one escapes.
Chief Justice Chaudhry is a brave man. He will NOT get intimidated by anyone. The matter is very simple if Zardari does not implement the Court Orders, then all these including Zardari should be sent to the jail.
Put Pakistan first, Zardari and his wealth should be brought bak.
This case is pretty much done and dusted. Gobar Awan is gonna get a dressing down of his life. I’m much more interested as what Hamesh Khan will divulge tomorrow.
What actually happened in the court room?
Rumours of clash with judiciary die out: Babar Awan
Updated at: 1112 PST, Tuesday, May 25, 2010
ISLAMABAD: Federal Law Minister Dr. Babar Awan said the rumours regarding the confrontations among the national institutions died out completely, Geo News reported Tuesday.
Talking to media after the NRO verdict case hearing outside the Supreme Court (SC) premises, he said the court accepted the proposal regarding filing written response of the government on the NRO implementation.
The court was receptive and magnanimous, he said adding the government presented its viewpoint with due respect.
‘There is no clash in institutions at present, nor will there be any conflict possible in future as well,’ he maintained.
The government laid bare new aspects of the NRO verdict case before the court, he said adding the government fulfilled its legal and constitutional responsibilities.
‘We did not level any accusations against anyone; there are written proofs of whatever we said,’ Qamaruz Zaman Kaira said talking to the journalists.
‘We are with the government and came to see the court’s proceedings. Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) gave huge sacrifices for the judiciary,’ he added.
‘Court ordered the Attorney General to appear before the court in my stead in the next hearing,’ he said.
Supreme Court Tuesday directed the government to file comprehensive stance over the Swiss cases in next hearing and adjourned the NRO verdict implementation case till June 10.
Federal Minister for Law Dr Babar Awan informed the Supreme Court that according to records there was no case filed in Switzerland, only investigations were made which were also one sided.
Federal Minister for Law Dr Babar Awan appeared before the apex court today to record his statement with regard to implementation of he Supreme Court’s verdict on National Reconciliation Ordinance.
Awan was also accompanied by former Attorney General Latif Khosa and federal ministers Raja Pervez Ashraf, Amin Fahim, Tasleem Qureshi, Ayatullah Durrani, Qamar Zaman Kaira and others.
Five-member Supreme Court bench headed by Justice Nasir-ul-Mulk heard the case.
Earlier, when the court proceedings begun this morning the court told the federal minister of law that he was summoned to know the government stance on the issue because the secretary of law didnt appear before the court.
A judge of the bench asked about the government measures taken for return of US$ 60 millions from Switzerland. Babar Awan informed the court that the talk about 60 million dollars was exaggerated.
Justice Raja Fayyaz asked the minister how many months and days will need the government to implement the NRO verdict. The law minister said the court has been informed about nine government steps over the verdict while the rules of business hinder the enforcement of the 10th step. He said in 1997 the Attorney General was not empowered to open cases in Switzerland.
Babar Awan informed the court that the action against for Attorney General Malik Qayyum Awan will begin within one month, for which a summary has been sent to the Prime Minister.
Dr Babar Awan’s Highlights
(by Mir Munsif)
Babar Awan maintained that:
1.There was No case specifically filed against President Asif Ali Zardari in Switzerland.According to record, only the investigations were conducted in Swiss court.
2.Reference against Malik Qayyum has been sent to the Prime Minister.
3.On court’s order, NAB’s prosecutor general was sacked and additional prosecutor general was appointed in the NAB.
4.In 1997 the Attorney General was not empowered to open cases in Switzerland. Babar said that court orders would be implemented in letter and spirit.
5.“There is no such amount. This amount is not there even in NAB’s report. These are only allegations, and wrong and malicious statements,” Awan said, referring to “legal complications” and “grey areas” in approaching the Swiss authorities.
Outside court he said ” rumours of clash died out, adding no clash among the institutions ever happened; nor is there any possibility for the same in future.”
After: The Mourners
All those high hopes and suspense ended, Very much disappointed by supreme court and its proceedings, it appears to be pre arranged live show.
Babar Awan went to Court accompanied by high profile PPP leaders to intimidate the Judges, he was rude and cocky in the court and his answers were humiliating and he succeeded in overpowering the S/C.
It appeared that a drama was staged and Babar Awan came out a winner, clear indication from today’s court proceedings that nothing will happen to Zardari or his Government.
We should never forget that Iftikhar Choudhry and some other Judges had a murky past, they helped and supported Musharaf and also took oath under PCO.
Maybe last minute call from PM Gilani to C/J Iftikhar resulted in a compromise or a deal.
I am very disappointed too by the line adopted by the Supreme Court TODAY….. something has gone wrong terribly. We don’t want this ‘drama-gheeri’ any more.
WE WANT DIRECT ACTION….Imran Khan, Qazi Hussain/Syed Munwwar Hasan where are you…..start the long march now, now ,now.
There appears to be deal with the Govt, and Babar Awan really roaring like a lion. If nothing happened today then nothing is going to happen after 2 weeks. The protest outside Geo TV will continue and we are looking helpless.
People of Muzaffagarh and Vihari gave the wrong verdict, encouraged PM and clearly Zardari and Babar Awan has won this round.
WE WANT LONG MARCH.
I am very very very angry. I will just wait till tomorrow to see what secrects can Hamesh Khan tell us. But it appears to me that Hamesh Khan will be very scared of Zardari, and he will not put blame on name Babar Awan for bribery or any one elso.
I won’t be surprised if all the members of Hamesh Khan family have been kidnapped by Zardari to put pressure on Hamesh Khan.
Wake up Pakistani’s, enough is enough…..I agree only Long March is the answer.
I think it’s Ch Iftikhar who needs some ‘desi chithroll’ .
irshad khan said:
Court appearance of Babar Awan was a true reflection of Italian MAFIA; Mr. Awan went in the court wearing dark glasses and accompanied by his gang.
I am surprised that the honorable Supreme Court did not raise objection on Mr. Awans conduct and tone of his offensive language in the court.
In short our Supreme Court lost its credibility and authority and it also lost the confidence of the people they had on them.
Zardari regime will rule the country, corruption will flourish and the public will suffer deeply.
A sane advice to the mourners
So all who were waiting for a drama and end of govt are disappointed. Before BA stepped in the court, he was a villain and now CJ is a villain. Guys, as always after each such episode, I advise you to grow up and again reminding the same thing. When will you start believing in the institutions instead of personalities. For the information of all those who are now blaming CJ, should at least go and learn about the composition of the larger bench. Also stop watching meray mutabiq and reading ansar abbasi, if you want to get out of fantasy land. Even ansar abbasi was feeling dejected and was forced to praise babar awan.
Supreme Court: The other side of coin
by Mir Munsif
17 amendment by MUSH which blacken the Constitution: No problem for Judiciary,silent and Happy,No actions.tell me what actions did SC took at that time to avert this amendment pls?????
NRO is BAD..fair enuff what about creators of NRO?? MUSH and Military Junta??Why not they scrutinized by SC????
Biggest Money laundering scandle: Sharif Brothers.
Biggest Bank Defaulters: Chaudhery Brothers.
Biggest no of Fake Degrees member: PMLN but only hue and cry against Jamshed Dasti??
PCO and MUSH Quo supporter: Judiciary.
People ’s disapearence case +Bugti case,Lal Masjid case+12 May Massacre : Call MUSH and cronies in courst…but No way,Judges are silent on these issues.
Higgest share in corruption: Military insititutes and Senior Officials…many cases in Pending in SC….BUT SIlence here also.No action from Judiciary.
Junk Journalism: Supporting the Military cum Judicial Intervene on payrolls of agencies.
18 the amendment with unanimous support from Parliament: Judiciary has problem
Support MUSH Junta Take over: IK and Judges…. (But ppl asks to forget it bcoz they have changed,while there is only accountability for PPP led Politicians).
NRO case=8000+ Cases… PPP cases (20s)+Rest related to MQM and other ppl but Judiciary has only case Zardari case.
Partisan Judiciary…No across the board accountability,only selective justice to counter PPP led democratic forces.
Here in our country,the accountability is only for PPP,justice is only selectively for PPP,Hate mongering for PPP.Tell me if PPP is all the worse set of party then who else is party of angels…Justice Party of SC?? PMLN?? MMA?? MQM? PMLQ???
Stop one-sided shame criticism,if you want to judicious and honest then criticize every evil act and shame character in every party,institutes and Media with impartial view point.
If such one sided Hate campaign continues,country will get marginalized and this is NEVER good for FEDERATION and Democracy.
By Cyril Almeida
Source: Dawn, 26 May, 2010
ISLAMABAD: Babar Awan was the coolest cat in Courtroom No 5 yesterday morning. At half nine, the law minister strode in to face five Supreme Court judges, wearing Terminator-style shades and chewing gum.
Was a Pakistani version of the Showdown at the OK Corral about to unfold? The alleged bandits versus the rule of law, each struggling to dominate the other?
Not on this day. Seconds into the hearing it was obvious there would be no fireworks. As Awan thanked the court for ‘inviting’ him to address the court, Justice Jawwad Khwaja interjected: “We didn’t summon the law minister.” Say what? Yep, it appears it was all a misunderstanding.
Justices Khwaja and Nasirul Mulk explained: the bench had been at its wit’s end trying to elicit from various officials what had been done to implement the NRO judgment. It had merely turned to the law minister in the hope of getting some answers. The court hadn’t summoned him.
The retreat had begun.
It took Awan 15 minutes to get to what everyone was waiting for. “What about the Swiss cases?” he asked rhetorically. Yes, indeed. Backs straightened in the room.
What followed was an hour of legal pantomime. You almost felt sorry for the court reporter who had to keep track of nonsensical segues and random digressions.
Awan talked about letters, past and present. He talked about authorisations, good and bad. He talked about due process. He talked about sections 20 and 21. He talked about surprising discoveries; surprising surprises; and surprises he had discovered. He talked about what he can do and what he can’t do, without specifying what belonged to which category.
Here’s a particularly compelling twister: “How can I follow a process when the process earlier was that there was no process?”
The judges let Awan talk, encouraging his haphazard digressions by asking follow-up questions. It was shambolic. It was probably exactly what Awan was hoping for.
The thrust of the law minister’s arguments was relatively clear: the law, at least as interpreted by Awan, prevents the government from writing to the Swiss authorities.
But Awan never came close to saying so directly because the judges never took the gloves off. The only hairy moment came towards the end when Justice Nasirul Mulk showed a flash of unhappiness over the law minister’s inability, or unwillingness, to make a clear statement on the issue of the Swiss cases.
The let-off followed instantly, though. File a concise statement at the next hearing, Babar was ordered. And don’t worry, you needn’t appear in person, he was told.
The game was up. Light banter followed and laughter rippled through the courtroom. Mission accomplished: crisis averted. Democracy 1, Instability 0.
Soon Awan was out the door, followed by the various ministers who had crowded into the small room. In days past they would stop to chat to reporters and well-wishers. Now they make a beeline for the cameras outside the court.
The lingering question, one which may dictate if there will be a next round: does the SC continue to show an inordinate interest in the fate of President Zardari and the Swiss cases?
Here are some numbers. 5 justices. 1 law minister. 8,041 NRO beneficiaries. 90-minute hearing. 80 minutes substantive issues discussed. 65 minutes spent on matters related to the Swiss cases.
Source: Dawn, 26 May 2010
Ayaz Amir writes:
Equally curious is the selective accountability zeal to be seen since the death of the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO). Revived as a result of that judgment are over 8,000 cases, many of them relating to grave criminal charges. What’s becoming of them? We really don’t know. Attracting all of the attention is the figure of President Asif Zardari and some of his close associates, none more so than that jack-in-the-box figure, Interior Minister Rehman Malik, who in a career full of surprises has gone from one thing to another.
Needless to say, the powerful should be the first to be called to account. But it would help if judicial enthusiasm, instead of appearing to be selective, travels also a bit left and right — for the sake of credibility, if nothing else.
Some basics — and how they affect the weather
Source: The News, May 21, 2010
Thi Khabar Garm…. – by Tahir Sarwar Mir
Some mourners (mentors of the Hizboos) can also be found in the following news report:
Awan’s appearance defuses govt, judiciary tension
* Law minister criticised for appearing in Supreme Court with a coterie of cabinet colleagues
By Masood Rehman
ISLAMABAD: Rumours about a clash between the government and the Supreme Court apparently died down on Tuesday after Law Minister Babar Awan appeared before a five-member Supreme Court bench in the implementation of the NRO verdict case.
The SC gave Awan two weeks’ time to submit a report on the matter.
Although the atmosphere outside and inside the courtroom remained normal before, during and after the hearing, people from various walks of life, including politicians, lawyers, bar leaders and political analysts, criticised Awan for bringing with him a number of his cabinet comrades to the courtroom.
They said court procedures were nothing new for Awan, therefore, the contingent accompanying him was unnecessary.
They questioned whether it was a show of power, solidarity with President Asif Ali Zardari or an attempt to pressure the court.
They wondered what message Awan was conveying to the court by bringing his comrades with him.
Commenting on Tuesday’s proceedings, constitutional expert and former law minister SM Zafar said, “I think Awan did not need to bring his colleagues with him in the court in a case in which he was summoned alone.”
To a query, he said the government was using delaying tactics to prolong the case, adding that such tactics would bear no fruit.
PML-N chief Nawaz Sharif, PML-Q President Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain and many other politicians criticised Awan for taking other ministers to court.
Justice (r) Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui, Justice (r) Fakhruddin G Ebrahim, former attorney general Justice (r) Anwar Mansoor Khan, Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) President Qazi Muhammad Anwar, former SCBA presidents Hamid Khan, Qazi Jameel, Tariq Mehmood and Dr Kahlid Ranjha said apparently the government was using delaying tactics in the implementation of the SC NRO verdict.
They said it was not a good omen for the whole nation, adding that Awan’s act was beyond comprehension.
An overwhelming majority of lawyers said the issue had the potential to result in a clash between the executive and the judiciary.
They said the government had no option but to implement the NRO verdict, adding that the government should contest the case, if any, before the court instead of using delaying tactics and giving political statements.
The ministers accompanying Awan were Qamar Zaman Kaira, Raja Pervez Asharf, Makhdoom Amin Faheem, Imtiaz Safdar Warraich, Abdul Razaq Thaeem and PM’s Adviser Latif Khosa.
Law Minister Baber Awan is a black stain on Pakistan and Islam. He is so called doctor, but he dont have original doctorate digree. So he is an imposter. He should be hanged in the chawk for the crimes he has done. He is a trait, got millions of rupees from Hamaish khan & co. Delibrately supporting Zardari for his crimes. These people are the mess for this country.
Regarding Asar Abbasi, the whole Pakistan Nation can be proud on Ansar Abasi and other people like him. He is really the son of this country and true lover of Islam.
you should stop propaganda against Ansar Abasi as u can not proove it. regarding babar awan and other traits every thing is already prooved. so stop defending these looters.
Who the bullshit says that there are no prooves regarding swiss bank’s money. shit on u. what the bullshit article. shame on u man. shame on u. ager saboot na hotey to ye log aisi harkatein hi na kartey. saboot hain issi liye hakoomat ne pehley wo case khatem karwaye and baad mein dobara kholney se dar rehey hain ye log.
Tum logon ke saamney to koi Quran b sar par uthaa le tab bhi nahin maano ge.. kyun keh paisey jo khaye hotey hain…aisey article likhney ke liye…
But Hamesh Khan is being given “Respect” by CJ Ifti – CJ assures fair trial to Hamesh Khan Updated at: 1440 PST, Wednesday, May 26, 2010 http://www.thenews.com.pk/updates.asp?id=105477
ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry during hearing of Punjab Bank scandal said Hamesh Khan will get a fair trial as he respected the law of the country and returned back home. A three-member bench of apex court, headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammed Chaudry heard the Punjab Bank scam case. Justice Khalilur Rehman Ramday and Justice Ghulam Rabbani are other members of the bench. During the hearing, Hamesh Khan informed the bench that all facilities made available for him and did not face any torture. The court has scolded on director NAB for not arresting Shaikh Nisar. Director NAB in his statement said that Shaikh Nisar is still at large within the country. Justice Ramday in his remarks said those taping our phones should trace out Shaikh Nisar. Director NAB in reply said that they don’t have technical facility of taping phone and IB has been approached for this purpose.
Baber Awan ne kon sa teer maar lia hai. Adalat se is ne time hi to maanga hai. Adalat ne time de dia hai. iss mein bhangrey daalney wali kon si baat hai. kon sa apney crimes se barri ho gya hai.
Hud hoti hai jhoot ki. sachai ko jhoot ke pardon ke peechey nahn chupaaya jaa sakta. Khuda ke liye iss qom par rehm karo. ager such nahin keh saktey to khuda ke liye kahin or chaley jao. is qom ki jaan chorr do….
But present CJ was in the bench with Dogar who provided relief to the same Zardari in Swiss Cases: Read the details in the end: [as reported in National Newspapers] Judicial Amnesia & Martial Law Duties. http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2010/04/judicial-amnesia-martial-law-duties.html
@ Aamir Mughal:
Thank you sir for your kind information. but you know why CJ has facilitate him, because Hamaish Khan ne khud apney aap ko paish kia hia iss liye. lakin ager na bhi paish kia hota to uss ne to sirf 9 arab rupees ka ghabun kia hia.. jin logon ne 165 arab rupees se bhi zyada ka ghabun kia hai.. un ko to ham ne is Qom ke taqdeer sonp di hai… iss lehaz se to Hamaish khan ko koi choti moti wazarut milni chahiye thi…
And this all money came back becuase of CJ, other wise iss hakoomat ki to apni policy hi pakistan ko lootna and lootney walon ko nawazna hai..
Hamesh Khan didn’t present himself in the Court but he was brought back in the country by the same “CORRUPT PPP/ZARDARI GOVERNMENT”
@ Aamir Mughal”
Here I would like to correct you and really sorry for that…. It is CJ order.. not corrupt and looter zardari….
Please update your information.
Ok leave them all…
Only one thing for the sake of Pakistan….
Only Imran Khan is sincere with this country. other all are … selfish…..
Imran Khan is the only hope for this country now….
It means the Corrupt Zardari is following CJ AND JUDICIARY’S ORDERS.
ab zardari se kahein keh jo uss ne billions of dollars lootey hain..ager wo bhi wapis le aaye to yakeen karein..ye qom ab bhi uss ko doa de gi…halankeh wo iss ka mustahik nahin…
aamir bhai…. aap ke kya kehney… bohot hi thanda jigra hai aap ka… i appreciate it though…
aamir bhai aap ne kabi bachon ko dekha hai numaz parrhtey huey..aik bacha apni marzi se numaz parrta hai wo nazer aata hai..and aik bachey ko uss ka baap kaan se pakker ka numaz parrhata ahi…to kya kaehin ge.. yehi keh uss ne numaz nahin parrhi, baap ne us ko umnaz parrhai hai..uss ne dil se nahin parrhi… jab apney aap ko qanoon ke hawaley karey ga.. i will definately appreciate it…
Imran Khan is the last and final hope of all Hizboos, Jamaatias and Taliboos.
@Sarah Khan: I think you ideal is zardari.. well, u deserve him… and you are lucky that you got what u deserve. Jo kaser rehti hai wo aap aa kar nikaal do iss mulk ki… na rehey baans na bajey baansri..ab bhi ager aap logon ko koi hosh nahin aaya to phir … shayed… Allah ne aap ke dilon par mohr kar rakhi hai. Allah bhi ussi ko hidayet ataa karta hai jo iss ka Ehl ho .. thanks for your compliments by the way.
Do you even know the names of Accused and Co Accused in Swiss Cases. Don’t insert Namaz and Islam in Political Discussion.
ok sir carry on……
Masla yehan ye hai ke koi namaz nahi parta per pakar uski hoti hai jo kehne per he sahi namaz tou parhta hai. Doosro per haath daltay huay tou in courts ki patloon geeli hoti hai aur PPP inko izzat deti hai tou inko raas nahi aati. Aik minister ko bulaya aur saaray haazir hogaye, aur kitni izzat chahiye in PCO judges ko?
Pehle Iftikhar Chaudry un privatization deals aur stock market crashes ka hisab dein jo unki nigraani mein hui aur jis mein yaqeenun unhein bhi rishwat mili hogi, phir doosro se hisaab talab kerein.
Well Babar Awan is a great politation in other hand i agree with Saad
Editorial: Daily Times
Better sense prevails
Those who were waiting with bated breath to
witness a showdown between the executive and the judiciary on May 25 were in for a disappointment. Law Minister Babar Awan appeared before a five-member Supreme Court bench that is overseeing the implementation of the NRO judgement. Mr Awan informed the bench that there has never been any case against President Zardari or late Benazir Bhutto in the Swiss courts. He informed the apex court that only investigations were conducted in a Swiss court against the president but there was “absolutely no case” against him. As for approaching the Swiss authorities, Mr Awan said there are “grey areas and legal intricacies” involved. What came as a surprise for everyone was the revelation that the bench had never summoned the law minister in the first place. The Supreme Court directed Mr Awan to submit a report within two weeks on the steps taken by the government to implement the NRO verdict. So, what could be the reason for this soft approach despite what the doomsayers have been predicting thus far? Whatever the reasons, it is good to see that the judiciary is trying to avoid a confrontation with the executive. And to finally see the government presenting its case in a proper manner also comes as a relief. This newspaper has been advising the government to do so for months now. But as they say, ‘better late than never’. It has done the government’s cause a lot of good while those who claimed that the judiciary had a hostile attitude to the government have been proved wrong. The government has made a sensible move while the judiciary too is working within the parameters of the constitution and within the law as had been promised by Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry. The judiciary’s decisions will be based on merit instead of mere hearsay, which is what is expected of an independent judiciary.
Pakistan is slowly but steadily trying to move towards a truly democratic system. A confrontation between two of the country’s most important institutions would only have hampered the system. Such a situation would only benefit the undemocratic forces; the whole nation would have suffered had the government locked horns with the judiciary or vice versa. Pakistan has fought long and hard for a return to democracy. We can ill afford another military coup or a toppling of the democratic set-up.
At a time when the government has ensured its full cooperation to the judiciary, Mian Nawaz Sharif’s press conference against the executive was a bit unsettling. Mr Sharif said that the government must ensure implementation of the decisions of the Supreme Court in letter and spirit and give up its policy of defiance. It would have helped if Mr Sharif had paid a bit more attention to the proceedings of the Supreme Court before going out on a PPP-bashing spree. The government has already assured its full support to the judiciary but instead of heaving a sigh of relief at the smooth proceedings like the general public did, Mian sahib looked perturbed at the unfolding events. Though Mr Sharif swears by democracy, his anti-government statements said otherwise.
It must be said once again that such moves would only be harmful and deleterious to the state. In the interests of the country and its people, we must stand by the age-old democratic principles and stop playing politics with the fate of Pakistan.
CJ sahib has gone blind. Kya credibility hai uss aadmi ki jo aik baar PCO pe oath utha le? Doosri baar stand le gaya tou kya hua.. Hai tou wohi PCO judge. Judicial policy le aane se konsa aapko insaaf milla? Koi daal roti milli aapko judiciary ‘independent’ hone se? Judiciary will remain political. Supreme Court k paas boht farigh waqt hai 20 NRO cases kliye jabke session courts mein aik judge roz 50 case adjourn karta hai.
Bhai! Ab IJI Asghar Khan case bhi sunlo. Aur aapka chief minister punjab abhi tak stay order pe hakoomat karraha hai, uss ka bhi faisla de do. Altaf Bhai k 25 case bhi hain bhai sahab. Jab tak inka decision nahi aata uss waqt tak lakh lanat.. Aur specially PTUJ ( Hizb e tahrir) pe..
Jahan tak reh gaee baat Imran Khan ki tou make some political presence. Baar baar talk shows pe aane se aur yeh bolna k “sab kuch hi bigra hai. System hi kharab hai”! Tou iss se kuch bhi nahi banta. Ab baar baar Musharraf tou nahi aaega jo aapko PM banne ki offer kare. Pichle 16 saal mein tou aap aik hi seat jeet sake hain aur woh bhi pedaishi. Bara dum hota aap mein tou Zulfikar Bhutto shaheed ki tarah 5 constituencies se jeet k dikhatey.