The Shia genocide in Bahrain shows Islam’s replacement by Wahhabism – by Omar Khattab
Related articles: LUBP Archive on Bahrain
Saudi Arabia’s army enters Bahrain to crush pro-democracy protesters
Wahhabism: The heart of darkness
By Omar Khattab
It is not the first time that the Shias of Bahrain have been subjected to untold miseries. However, it is for the first time that it appears that the ruling royal family of Bahrain, cheered and supported by the Wahhabi House of Saud of Saudi Arabia, is serious about launching a Shia holocaust in Bahrain where the Shias are in majority.
The West led by the United States has condemned human rights violations in Libya. Hillary Clinton is upset with the killing of a hundred of so Libyans, but the uncounted corpses of Shia protestors have evoked no response from the White House or the State Department. But I do not blame the United States. It operates on the principle of self-interest and the security of Israel. What is worth noting is the attitude of non-Shia Muslims all over the world. From Indonesia from one end of the world to Morocco to the other, there is no condemnation of the Shia genocide in Bahrain. The only fault of the Shias is that they are demanding their human and natural rights. They are more than 70 percent of the population of Bahrain and yet have no say in the affairs of the government. They have been reduced to the status of third-class citizens in their own country.
The overwhelming number of Bahraini soldiers and policemen are outsiders. They are comprised of Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and African mercenaries who have been given Bahraini citizenship in order to reduce the Shia majority and kill those Shias who dare demand their rights. These mercenaries on their part are the kind of people who will be willing to commit any inhuman act for money.
It is not money, however, which is the main motive behind these mercenaries killing unarmed Shia men, women, and children. There is something else going on here. If you look at the politicians, human rights campaigners, journalists, and anchor persons in the Muslim world, you will find that they are either completely indifferent to the Shias of Bahrain (and elsewhere), or supporting their killers and tormentors by suppressing the facts about their plight. Why is this so? The answer is: Wahabi money. The Wahhabi Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has corrupted these people through money and anti-Shia hate materials (money is involved here too). In a country like Pakistan where one Palestinian or Kashmiri killed results in mad clamoring for jihad, not a single, yes a single, voice has been raised for the Shias of Bahrain. Pakistanis in general cry hoarse claiming that Islam is the religion of peace and yet are complicit in every unimaginable and unspeakable crime. Their reaction to Salman Taseer’s assassination (and martyrdom) at the hands of an Islamofascist is one instance. The Wahabi petro-dollars have crushed Islam and now what we have is Wahabism which stands for all that is evil and vile in human nature and societal functioning.
Before his martyrdom, Imam Hussain (AS) asked: “Is there anyone on my side [i.e., on the side of truth]? Today, the Shias blood in Bahrain is asking the same question to the Sunnis of Pakistan and elsewhere. Will they show character by standing up for them?
Thanks for writing this powerful and very timely piece, Mr. Khattab.
I will assemble a few recent tweets and post shortly.
From Twitter (read from bottom up):
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
@
RT New LUBP post @SarahKhan123 The Shia genocide in #Bahrain shows Islam’s replacement by Wahabism: By Omar Khattab
9 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
Analysts say a Shi’ite prime minister in #Bahrain would be strongly opposed by Saudi Arabia http://reut.rs/hKEaCg
11 minutes ago
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
Prime Minister Sheikh Khalifa bin Salman al-Khalifa of #Bahrain, the world’s longest serving head of government http://reut.rs/hKEaCg
12 minutes ago
angryarabiya angry arabiya
by AbdulNishapuri
Bahrain TV why do u put live broadcast of pro-gov rally for hours and not even one image of todays more than 100thousand protesters rally?
1 hour ago
mohd_2012 m sharafudeen
by AbdulNishapuri
RT @reuters: Q A: What happens next in Bahrain? http://reut.rs/hKEaCg
40 minutes ago
ShaimaAlWardi S.AlWardi
by AbdulNishapuri
From the new CNN.com: Thousands protest in Bahrain – http://bit.ly/eAJeAz #cnn #lulu #Bahrain
2 hours ago
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
the language of ruling party in #Bahrain sounds a lot like the language of white South Africans or of militant Israeli settlers in West Bank
27 minutes ago
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
The government talks about “unity” and complains that the opposition is encouraging sectarianism. Please! #Bahrain
28 minutes ago
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
Previous tweet from a post by @NickKristof Is this Apartheid in Bahrain? http://nyti.ms/gzDqJ7
29 minutes ago
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
Why is it any more appropriate for a minority Sunni population to rule over majority Shia than in South Africa for white to rule over black?
30 minutes ago
NickKristof Nicholas Kristof
by AbdulNishapuri
Is this Apartheid in Bahrain? My blog post – and tell me what I got wrong – http://nyti.ms/gzDqJ7
11 hours ago
NickKristof Nicholas Kristof
by AbdulNishapuri@
@neoxyrel “Don’t take sides”? My job is to take sides. I’m an opinion columnist, not a news reporter.
3 hours ago
NickKristof Nicholas Kristof
by AbdulNishapuri
US blundering in Bahrain, in bed with autocrats, reflects our pattern in much of the region: http://nyti.ms/hFzbbB
2 hours ago
NickKristof Nicholas Kristof
by AbdulNishapuri
Having failed to bomb his people into submission, #Qaddafi is now using his TV speech to try to bore them to death.
48 minutes ago
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
Ash-shaab yurid asqat el nizam (The people want the fall of the regime) #Bahrain
40 minutes ago
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
An open letter to President Obama from USA and Bahraini citizens http://tiny.cc/zpyeb #Bahrain
42 minutes ago
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
@
Those protesting against the king are Arabs too RT @m_khamdan excuze me Sir, we are an arabic country, #Bahrain
44 minutes ago
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
While world media reports 100,000 protesters in Bahrain, acc. to Al Wahhabiya (Al Jazeera), “Hundreds of demonstrators” http://tiny.cc/rgiet
46 minutes ago
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
At the moment, feelings toward the US are neutral, and in some circles even positive, but they could slip toward hostile #Bahrain
56 minutes ago
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
Washington’s posture toward the Shiite majority could prove crucial to future relations with this small but strategically valuable nation
56 minutes ago
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
The Ministry of the Interior, via its Twitter feed, issued a terse acknowledgment: “Sheikh Khalifa Bin Salman towards Manama is now closed.”
57 minutes ago
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
Security forces were nowhere to be seen along the demonstration route.
58 minutes ago
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
In a nation of only a half a million citizens, the sheer size of the gathering is astonishing. #Bahrain Pearl Square
58 minutes ago
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
More than 100,000 protesters in Bahrain, the biggest antigovernment demonstration yet in this tiny Persian Gulf kingdom http://tiny.cc/1nu56
1 hour ago
The Shia genocide in Bahrain remains ignored by the Deobandi and Wahhabi dominated Pakistani media. Many Shias in influential positions in Pakistani media remain coopted by the ISI or/and the Jamaat Islami.
It is brave Sunnis such as Omar Khitab and others who are working for Shia rights, Ahmadi rights, Christian rights ec.
More power to your pen Omar Khitab.
Bahrain’s army deliberately killing peaceful marchers: It is extremely graphic, be warned…
http://youtu.be/w9p6GQ7S51A?hd=1
From Facebook
A friend of mine, who is now in Manama, Bahrain, said that “the demonstrators were told not to come to an illegal rally, why did they take law in their hands, so the outcome is natural and fair” He is one of those Pakistani who have been di…gging gold in Bahrain! Another Pakistani living in Bahrain said “these Bahrainis are illiterate, and we are running their country!” His comment reminded me the Punjabi establishment’s thinking about Sindhis and Balochis in Pakistan! The security apparatus of Bahrain comprising most foreigners hate the local poor Bahrainis who happened to be mostly Shias. But it doesn’t mean the security forces love poor Sunni Bahrainis!
Bahrain uprising
Posted By omar on February 18, 2011
http://www.brownpundits.com/2011/02/18/bahrain-uprising/
Viciously suppressed, for now. But the regime’s troubles are not over.
To our shame, some of the suppressing seems to have been done by Pakistani mercenaries (there is an elite battalion of ex-Pakistani commandos who constitute a special security force in Bahrain). There are also rumors that regular Pakistani troops were used….I have heard that the 11th AK regiment is stationed there….this would not be the first time the Pakistani army acts on its mission of defending the rulers of the faithful. In 1970, then brigadier Zia ul Haq led his armored unit in an assault against Palestinian refugee camps during the black september uprising.
Meanwhile the presence of Saudi troops in this operation is not really a secret.
The problem in Bahrain is that unarmed protesters have limited options against a state that is willing to kill and has the means to do so (as in China in 1989 or Iran now and in the recent past). Moral pressure is unlikely to be much use against sheikhdoms that are hosts to the American fleet and earn their money from Oil and related services. Still, I wonder what Al Jazeera is saying now?
Is This Apartheid in Bahrain?
By NICHOLAS KRISTOF
http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/22/is-this-apartheid-in-bahrain/
A few scattered thoughts about Bahrain, on a day on which huge protests are unfolding.
Members of the ruling family, the Khalifas, are rightly proud of what they’ve built here. Bahrain is modern, moderate and well-educated, and by Gulf standards it has more of the forms of democracy than some others. But here’s my question to King Hamad: Why is it any more appropriate for a minority Sunni population to rule over majority Shia than it was in South Africa for a minority white population to rule over a majority black population? What exactly is the difference?
Indeed, the language of the ruling party sounds a lot to me like the language of white South Africans — or even like the language of white southerners in Jim Crow America, or the language of militant Israeli settlers in the West Bank. There’s a fear of the rabble, a distrust of full democracy, a sense of entitlement. Apartheid isn’t exactly the right metaphor, because there isn’t formal separation (although neighborhoods are often either Sunni or Shia), and people routinely have very close friends of the other sect. But how can a system when 70 percent of the population is not eligible for the army be considered fair? How can a system in which the leading cabinet positions are filled by one family be considered fair?
The government talks about “unity” and complains that the opposition is encouraging sectarianism. Please! An American friend was on the roundabout Thursday morning when police attacked. They caught him but when they saw he was American they were friendly and said they were hunting Shia only. My friend said the experience left him feeling icy, as if they were hunting rats. And several people I talked to who were there said that the police used anti-Shia epithets and curses as they were beating prisoners. If the government wants to ease sectarianism, it might start by bringing Shia into the police and armed forces and fire anybody caught making derogatory comments about Shiites.
The two sides are very, very far apart right now, and it’s hard to imagine them hammering out a compromise that both can agree on. The opposition would accept King Hamad continuing as king – perhaps more like a Moroccan or Jordanian king than a British one, but still much less powerful than today – but the Khalifa family would have to give up the way it dominates Bahrain. Right now, government is pretty much a family affair, and that would have to end. I worry that the result will be more strikes and protests and a stalemate, and then harder-line elements in the family will again use force. The big worry in the roundabout isn’t so much that the army goes in again, but that the government sends in thugs (perhaps Wahabis from Saudi Arabia, by opening the causeway to them) to provoke fighting and intimidate the protesters. That’s similar to what I saw Mubarak do in Cairo, and it was terrifying.
Two things bother me about the protests. One is that the participants are overwhelmingly Shia. I’ve met a few Sunni on the roundabout, but very, very few – and that makes it less authentic and broad-based an opposition movement than it should be. There are lots of disgruntled Sunni, but they don’t go out on the streets, either because they don’t feel comfortable in a Shia-dominated movement or because their families work in the army or police (as many poor Sunnis do) and would get in severe trouble for doing so. Nonetheless, the protest organizers could try harder to reach out to the Sunni community, and a first step would be to stop the “Death to al-Khalifa” chants and similar slogans. The other day I saw a sign reading “Imagine Bahrain without the al-Khalifas.” That kind of thing is utterly inappropriate. The opposition has to do what Nelson Mandela did so brilliantly in South Africa – make clear that majority rule will not lead to persecution of the minority. Every time the democracy movement scrawls “Death to Al-Khalifa” on a sign, it erodes its own legitimacy before the world.
So what do you think? I’m a newcomer to Bahrain (this is only my second visit), so tell me what I got wrong, what I misunderstand and what’s going to happen. How is this going to end?
I would like to mention two civil society activists of Pakistan (one of them works in a foreign agency and the other scribbles for a local newspaper), one of them openly stated that ‘they’ cannot afford another Iran in the Gulf area.
One of these sectarian hate mongers is notorious for conducting fake interviews with Baloch leaders while the other refused a tiny prize from the US ambassador while proceeding to the US for a much larger scholarship. Speaks volumes of the Wahhabi dominance and hypocrisy in Pakistan’s civil society and media!
What an excellent and timely post
Excellent post. While reading this Israr Ahmed’s Jawab Deh interview .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhJPN2L1HZc&feature=player_embedded
They don’t acknowledge shia genocide happening in their own beloved country ; accepting shia genocide happening in Pakistan is like hurting their “Pakistaniat” . How can you expect them fight against shia’s genocide in Bahrain . Acknowledge shia genocide in Bahrain is like questioning their “muslimaniat “.
The government seems to have accepted that violence will not silence the opposition and has shifted its strategy. It has set up a press center to get its message out and is working with a public relations firm.
But on Monday night, in the wealthy neighborhood of Juffeir, tens of thousands of pro-government demonstrators poured into Al Fateh Grand Mosque to express their support for the embattled king.
¶ The pro-government crowd borrowed some of the opposition’s slogans, including “no Sunni, no Shia, only Bahraini.” But that was where the call for unity started and ended.
¶ This was an affluent crowd, far different than the mostly low-income Shiites who have taken to the streets to demand a constitutional monarchy, an elected government and a representative parliament. The air was scented with perfume and people drove expensive cars. In a visceral demonstration of the distance between Sunni and Shiite, the crowd cheered a police helicopter that swooped low, a symbol of the heavy-handed tactics that have been used to intimidate the Shiites.
¶ “We love King Hamad and we hate chaos,” said Hannan Al Abdallah, 22, as she joined the pro-government rally. “This is our country and we’re looking after it.”
¶ Ali Al Yaffi, 29, drove to the pro-government demonstration with friends in his shiny white S.U.V. He was angry and distrustful. “The democracy they have been asking for is already here,” he said. “But the Shias, they have their ayatollahs, and whatever they say they will run and do it. If they tell them to burn a house, they will. I think they have a clear intention to disrupt this country.”
¶ On that point there is agreement: the Shiite opposition does want to disrupt, but with peaceful protests aimed at achieving its demands. The public here has learned the lessons of Egypt’s popular uprising and the power of peaceful opposition.
¶ “I feel freedom like I never felt it in my life, but I’m also a little worried,” said Hussein Al Haddad, 32, as he marched with the Shiite protesters on Tuesday. “What is going to happen next?”
¶ Last Monday, Shiites tried to hold a “day of rage,” modeled on the uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt that forced out autocratic presidents. The police gave no ground, firing on crowds with tear gas and rubber bullets and leaving one man dead, shot in the back. The next day, at the funeral, another man was killed the same way.
¶ The protesters marched into Pearl Square, the symbolic center of the city, and set up camp. In the early morning hours, the police raided the camp, killing three men. Then on Friday, a group of unarmed protesters tried to march into the square. The Army opened fire, and one young man, Abdul Redha Mohammed Hassan, was left with a bullet in his head. He died on Monday and was buried on Tuesday.
¶ The Army’s attack on unarmed civilians shocked even the government’s supporters and the military was withdrawn. The demonstrators poured back in, setting up a camp and a speaker’s podium and making clear they would not leave until their demands were met. The first demand, now, is the dissolution of the government and an agreement to create a constitutional monarchy.
¶ “They are the ones who made the demands grow bigger,” said Mohammed Al Shakhouri, 51, as he watched a procession of thousands follow the coffin of Mr. Hassan to the cemetery for burial.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/23/world/middleeast/23bahrain.html
MANAMA, Bahrain — More than 100,000 demonstrators packed the central Pearl Square here on Tuesday in what organizers called the largest pro-democracy demonstration this tiny Gulf nation has ever seen, as the monarchy struggled to hold onto its monopoly on power.
¶ In a nation of only 500,000 citizens, the sheer size of the gathering was astonishing. Tens of thousands of men, women and children, mostly members of the Shiite majority, formed a ribbon of protest for several miles along the Sheik Khalifa Bin Salman Highway as they headed for the square, calling for the downfall of the government in a march that was intended to show national unity.
¶ “This is the first time in the history of Bahrain that the majority of people, of Bahraini people, get together with one message: This regime must fall,” said Muhammad Abdullah, 43, who was almost shaking with emotion as he watched the swelling crowd.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/23/world/middleeast/23bahrain.html
BAHRAINI SHIA PARTY DENIES LINKS TO YEMENI HOUTHIS
Passed to the Telegraph by WikiLeaks 9:02PM GMT 18 Feb 2011
Ref ID: 09MANAMA543
Date: 9/9/2009 7:41
Origin: Embassy Manama
Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Destination:
Header: VZCZCXRO1216RR RUEHDE RUEHDH RUEHDIRDE RUEHMK #0543 2520741ZNY CCCCC ZZHR 090741Z SEP 09FM AMEMBASSY MANAMATO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8908INFO RUEHZM/GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL COLLECTIVERUEHYN/AMEMBASSY SANAA 0738RHBVAKS/COMUSNAVCENTRHMFISS/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL
Tags: PGOV,KISL,YM,BA
C O N F I D E N T I A L MANAMA 000543 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/09/2019 TAGS: PGOV, KISL, YM, BA SUBJECT: BAHRAINI SHIA PARTY DENIES LINKS TO YEMENI HOUTHIS REF: A. BRYAN-HENZEL E-MAIL B. AUGUST 25 Classified By: Ambassador Adam Ereli for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
1.(C) Summary: Bahrain’s mainstream Shia Wifaq party denied claims that it was supporting Yemeni Houthis. End summary.
2.(SBU) A Salafist member of Bahrain’s parliament, known for anti-Shia incitement, recently made public claims that Bahrain’s mainstream Shia opposition party Wifaq had met with and “supports” Yemen’s Houthis. The Salafist, MP Jassim Saeedi, has a history of sensationalist charges against Bahraini Shia.
3.(C) Wifaq MP Jassim Hussain told DCM that Wifaq officials had met in late August with a Yemeni parliamentary delegation that included at least one Yemeni Zaidi MP, but asserted Wifaq would not consider contacts with Houthi rebels. Wifaq’s foreign affairs specialist Saeed Al Majid, in a separate conversation with Poloff, denounced Saeedi as a liar who was seeking to incite his Sunni base with tales of Shia conspiracies. Al Majid added that Wifaq maintains contacts with “legitimate political parties” and governments around the world but did not view relations with the Houthis as likely to serve the interests of Wifaq or Bahrain. ERELI
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wikileaks-files/bahrain-wikileaks-cables/8334599/BAHRAINI-SHIA-PARTY-DENIES-LINKS-TO-YEMENI-HOUTHIS.html
Bahrain releases prisoners as king leaves country on trip
From Tim Lister, CNN
February 23, 2011 — Updated 0821 GMT (1621 HKT)
Bahraini protesters hoist a released political prisoner in the air at Pearl roundabout, Manama, on February 22, 2011.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
Bahrain’s King Hamad set to leave to go to Saudi Arabia
Bahrain urges “national dialogue” as protests continue
Tens of thousands gather Tuesday for biggest anti-government rally yet
Manama (CNN) — Bahrain has released about 25 high-profile political detainees, following an order by the king to free those he described as “prisoners of conscience” and halt proceedings against others, the Bahrain Center for Human Rights said Wednesday.
Among those released late Tuesday were the prominent blogger and human rights activist Ali Abdulemam, who runs bahrainonline.org; Abdul-Ghani Khanjar, a member of Committee for the Victims of Torture; and Mohammed Saeed, who works with the Bahrain Center for Human Rights.
In addition, several prominent Shiite clerics were released as was Dr. Abduljalil Al-Sengais, spokesman of the Haq Movement for Civil Liberties and Democracy.
Nabil Rajab of the Bahrain Center for Human Rights told CNN that the releases bring to about 100 the number of political detainees so far released, but he says an estimated 400 people are still detained on politically-inspired charges.
Bahraini demonstrator buried Thousands protest in Bahrain Inside Bahrain protests
RELATED TOPICS
Bahrain
Formula One Racing
The move to free prisoners comes as protests continued in Bahrain.
King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa was set to arrive in Saudi Arabia on Wednesday, a day after a crush of protesters covered the streets of his country’s capital in anti-regime protests, Saudi Press Agency reported.
Tens of thousands of people marched in the biggest anti-government rally since the public disturbances in the island nation erupted last week, and chants of “No Shia, No Sunni, only Bahraini” and “The regime must go” rang through the multitudes tramping across the center of Manama.
The turnout was led by ambulance workers involved in rescuing some of those injured in the assault by security forces last Thursday on the Pearl Roundabout, which has been the epicenter of the Shiite-dominated protest movement.
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/meast/02/23/bahrain.protests/index.html
Can the voices of innocent and unarmed Bahrainis be silenced by gun shoot down? The history tells No, Never. What if these unarmed protestors are provided wtih guns – my brain fuses out only thinking of this, Iran is not far away. I earnestly request the Bahrainis rulers to have a dialogue with them before it is too late.
For those martyred in the Bahraini movement I have a line from Sahir’s poem:
Jurm ulfat men hamain log saza detay hain
Kaisay nadan hen ke sholon ko hawa detay hain
I have been horrified at the Bahrain military murders of innocent protestors. I am also appalled at the lack of comprehensive coverage of Bahrain on American TV on CNN, Fox, MSNBC, ABC, et. al. I am astonished that no channels appear to have covered the bloodshed with the appropriate urgency. I have had to tune into al Jazeera TV, and watch videos on LUBP to find the truth on the ground. Where is the international outrage at the Bahrain murders of peaceful protesters? The President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton are not speaking out decisively the bloodshed; Instead we hear theoretical musings of what it means for the U.S.- the most powerful nation in the world does not need to be discussing what this means for oil and alliances. We should be fed up with platitude by now, and now is not the time to be speculating about Bahrain Shia/Iranian connections, when the entire Arab world watches, as we do, the killing of innocents in the streets. The time is for the US to stand up and pronounce solidarity for the rights of citizens globally that are standing up to their oppressors. We consistently give lip service to liberties, and our love of freedoms, here is or chance to support change of oppressive regimes.
While other states do have the right to self-determination, and it won’t always go our way, I believe where there are opportunities such as this of grassroots protestors seeking their own self-determination, we should express definitive support for peaceful demonstrations, and combined outrage at the violence. If you are wondering at my own usually dispassionate voice sounding uncharacteristically enraged, I invite you to watch the LUBP video for yourself. One minute youthful, peaceful marchers, ahead a military blockade, then the rattattat of firearms, then a crowd horrified with many youth now dead and bleeding in the street. I ask you, have you heard of this on American TV? And, where is the feckless UN outrage?
This isn’t about Sunni vs Shia as much as it is about good versus evil.
Thank You Sarah Khan for the footage in the name of “truth.”
New Fatwa By Saudi Wahhabi Extrimist Clerics: Bahrainis are Infidel, Kill Them All
Saudi Wahhabi extremist clerics encouraged their army by issuing a Fatwa (religious verdict) to kill Bahraini people as much as they can.
These extremists called Bahraini Muslim as infidels, because they are Shia and demanding their freedom.
In the verdict they asked the army not to pity with children or women, just kill everyone you see.
According to informed sources Saudi occupier forces heavily attacked unarmed protesters in Sitrah which more than 800 injured and many martyred.
Hi my friend! I wish to say that this post is amazing, nice written and come with approximately all significant infos. I would like to see extra posts like this .
Hello. Very cool website!! Guy .. Excellent .. Superb .. I will bookmark your site and take the feeds additionally…I’m happy to locate a lot of useful info right here in the article. Thanks for sharing..
Hello Web Admin, I noticed that your On-Page SEO is is missing a few factors, for one you do not use all three H tags in your post, also I notice that you are not using bold or italics properly in your SEO optimization. On-Page SEO means more now than ever since the new Google update: Panda. No longer are backlinks and simply pinging or sending out a RSS feed the key to getting Google PageRank or Alexa Rankings, You now NEED On-Page SEO. So what is good On-Page SEO?First your keyword must appear in the title.Then it must appear in the URL.You have to optimize your keyword and make sure that it has a nice keyword density of 3-5% in your article with relevant LSI (Latent Semantic Indexing). Then you should spread all H1,H2,H3 tags in your article.Your Keyword should appear in your first paragraph and in the last sentence of the page. You should have relevant usage of Bold and italics of your keyword.There should be one internal link to a page on your blog and you should have one image with an alt tag that has your keyword….wait there’s even more Now what if i told you there was a simple WordPress plugin that does all the On-Page SEO, and automatically for you? That’s right AUTOMATICALLY, just watch this 4minute video for more information at. Seo Plugin