An Special Gift for Dr. Zakir Naik and his Corrupt, Vile, and Filthy financiers [Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, and Qatar] Corrupt, Vile & Filthy: Arabs, Aal-e-Saud, & Wahhaabis.
http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2010/06/corrupt-vile-filthy-arabs-aal-e-saud.html

i am firoz khan from mumbai..

i would like to tell all my friends here that what ever you listen and what ever u seen on video kindly confirm it.. because here in india TRUTH can be made FALSE.

kindly listen what Dr. Zakir Naik says not what people here write or speak.

and see what he says completely not what media show in his small clip. buy watching trailer of a movie you cannot say what will be the movie.

Dr Zakir naik is a gift from GOD and you can from him about ISLAM, HINDUISM, CRISTIAN etc.

so visit irf.net to see complete video and listen to him then come to a conclusion.

Dear brothers,
This is Jahangir Raza from Karachi, whether Dr. Zakir is wrong or right, but I like his famous quote “To learn about the true spirit of Islam, don’t look at me (Dr. Zakir), Mullas and/or any Muslim in this world but Quran and authentic Hadith only”
Therefore, it is advisable to follow the teaching of Quran and Hadith only…
As for another arguments, Prophet Muhammed PBUH and his caliphs (Khalifas) never addressed themselves as Shia, Sunni, Wahabi or Devbandi, Madni/Makki and GOD knows what else… neither any specific fiqua (maslak) has been ever been listed in the Quran or Hadith… then why we are arguing with each other!!! If Dr. Zakir is wrong, then Allah will deal with him… Think about ourself as to what we are doing about Islam and Humanity?

It is very easy to point finger at each other (specially in today’s Muslim culture), but when it comes to any religious related matter, then every champion of the fiqua is having a different opinion.

Last but not least, I’m not against Dr. Zakir neither 100% supporting his views… but at the moment, he is the only Muslims scholar after Ahmed Deedat, who have balls to challenge whole NON-Muslims in the world to prove Islam is wrong! Yet he can alone face the crowd of hundred thousand to face and reply their disgusting question against Islam… Is there any mullah have balls to organize such an open debate with non muslim? The answer is BIG NO… So stop mucking about Dr. Zakir and support his vision to spread Islam as per Quran only and not by Mulla’s Islam… specially Paki mullas are nothing but bunch of s**t and extremist extremist…

What he talks is RIGHT..It all depends on how you understand it.I aurge media, while putting it across public please be careful put the complete statements of what he says, Please stop targetting him.

asslam o alikum
bat assal main yeh hay k hum logu ka hisab us shakhs ke trha hay jis ko kaha jy k tumhara kan kuta lay giya to wo forn kutay k pechy bagnay lgta hay.
number 2 hum log aadhe bat suntay han aur lay k shuru ho jatay han k fulan aadmi aisa hy yeh nahe daikhtay k hud kaisay han hum bs itna suntay han k nimaz mt parh aagay condition nahe daikhtay k jb tu nashay may ho.
hmaray aik firkay k aulama jb daikhtay han k dosra koe peak pay ja raha hay to us ke tang khenchnay k leay tayar ho jatay han aur us ke khamiyan tlash krna shuru ho jatay han.
no 3 hum log jzbati boht han sochtay nahe kush k is bat k pechay asal bat kiya hay aur issi cheaz ka fida kafir uthatay han apne tareah ko daikh lain k kissi muslim koom nay kuffar say medan a jang may shikast nahe khai tu kuffar nay muslaims ko aapis may lrwayajis say un ka ziwal aya aaj b yehi sazish hay is leay meri ulmaa say b aur awam say b yehi guzarish hay k ikhylafi msayl ko mil baith k hal kiya jy aur aakkhirat ki fikar ki jay.
agar kissi ko meri bat passand na i ho to muaffi ke derkhuast hay.

yours sweat brother.
M nauman akram
AiL 1455

we are people with idiotic thinking. we are against a person in a minute without getting into details about the fact and start blaming. most of my non muslim friends, who are full of hatered and calling him a terrorist as he actually proved who was actual master mind of 9/11, how can they understand the actual terorrist and who had actually killed the innocent lives. the so called super powers and their residents who dont know whom they have voted to lead them is a bastard liar and accepted it after creating havoc with innocent lives in iraq and afghanistan. all lives perished in those 10 years are gone to dust by these few words by mr bush that we had wrong intelligence reports and by tony blair who misguided their people into war by saying all but lies that iraq is having WMD and if we dont stop them they can attack us in 10 min. and my dear rumsfield showing map of iraq with places of WMD marked, and in answer to question he said that we are having a credible intelligence about the positions of WMD marked on that map. so game, set match as far as misguiding people into war. terorrist is a big term. as far as Dr Zakir Naik is concerned he is a man of stature and he is better then most of us by chance muslims. it is well said that you cannot keep every one happy at one time some one is likel;y to hate you as remarks will be not of his liking. simple answer to that stop listening to talks u dont like and chill

Dr Zakir Naik is my favourite islamic preacher, even not only islamic, he had a good commond on all religions also. May GOD help him and Let him to explode Islam in all over the world. He had done nothing because every one is viewing just a clip of his video not the fulll talk

What I think of Dr Zakir Naik and why I am against him?
Dr Zakir Naik MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery) is a preacher and speaker from the Islamic community talking on various different topics relating widely on religions, religious scriptures, political issues and many other topic. One of unique things about Dr Zakir Naik is that he suggests that he knows everything about different religions, Islamic, Christianity, Jewish, Buddhism, Sikhism, Hinduism and Jainism. Moreover he is also aware of what is said in every scripture’s and knows the chapters, verses and quotes of by heart. He has been all over different places countries and spreading those lectures in relation to these areas specifically. In every session taken place on different topics, the whole building has been full up with public for his lecture. A lot of people ask questions in relation to those topics and they answered very smartly by him, whether the person asking is Muslim or not Muslim.
What I personally believe about Dr Zakir Naik?
With Dr Zakir Naik talking about all these different topics and spreading his opinion is not right and I believe that it is totally wrong. This is because; he always thinks logically his way and assumes that must be the right way. As a result, most of the people see what he believes and happens to change their decision in that case. Should that be allowed publicly?
Why I believe this about Dr Zakir Naik?
For Dr Zakir Naik having this type of discussion influences people and believed that it is only him that is aware of what is right and wrong. The people drown into what he believes. As a result, this gives him to opportunity to divert their brain however he wants them. This then would stop them from thinking and they believe that Dr Zakir Naik is the god.
Comparing two different religious scriptures:
It is a fact that all different religions have their own scriptures. More common is that even the scripture say the same thing; they are going to have different meaning and different belief because; they introduce different religions. The way Dr Zakir Naik approaches them is by comparing two different scriptures from different religion. The most common way is to by looking at the similarities and mentioning those points in an Islamic way. Also, in various scripture, he says that he knows Chapter, verses and quotes of by heart, which is not the case all the time. Also misinterprets the meaning, but makes it some obvious to public and they believe them. This turns down other scriptures and make them less informative to people that belong or do not belong that community. The main effort by him is having good argument and logic involved on those topics. But to my point of view, it is totally baseless if they are not to have the real meaning. The audience happen to believe them as they are influenced by them very strongly. But it gets a lot worse when people from those community loss faith. I believe that is very bad and unacceptable way to lecture over different religion. It is not only me, but various other people that are Muslim and non Muslim thinks the same.
Comparing two different religions:
When the discussions are done on religion, Dr Zakir Naik has the common approach carried out by comparing two different religions. The religion introduced all the time is Islamic and in comparison introduced other religions that are Christianity and Hinduism most of the time. By introducing Christianity, he implies how their values and Islamic values are similar. It is the same approach with the Hinduism and what values come under that religion. The comparison introduced in this what Hindus and Islamic believe in common. I really am not satisfied when such comparisons are made that do not have any similarities at all. This is because; in comparison, he makes judgement of what Hinduisms have in common. Comments are made by him regarding Hindus believing in Idols as god and holy offering that are given in temple to the worshipers and in counter responses brings in what the scriptures say by misinterpreting it. Can this not have negative impact on what people should believe in Hinduism? I see that it has nothing go to do with Dr Zakir Naik and he does not the real fact on what Hinduism believes. The most approaches carried out are by connecting things that have different meaning but want to introduce that their in no dedication like this. With Hinduism being vegetarian, he also counter argue and introduce false believe is carried out. In many discussions, he has been discussing about existence of the Hindu gods and introduces what the Hindu scriptures say by totally misinterpreting what it means. As a result, this misguides many people and they happen to go against the belief. This creates a lot of problem because other religions would have bad opinion about Hinduism and can brainwash people from Hinduism and other people from different community. Is Dr Zakir not racist? Also, in discussion suggests some things that Hinduism needs to follow by saying that they do not. Is this not going to demoralise the Hindus community? Will it not make the Hindu community look bad in comparison to other communities?
Discussing about political issues (Islamic Terrorism):
Apart from religion Dr Zakir Naik also has discussion on political issues that very closely relate to Islamic community. One of the main topics introduced by him is on terrorism and in what ways political reasons have defamed the Islamic community in the society. To make the people think in a different way, Dr Zakir Naik shows how other religions and community are part of terrorist organisation. In the discussion, Dr Zakir Naik had involved how Great Britain had been affected by terrorism. It was obvious that Great Britain was affected by terrorism on the 7 July 2005 and America on the 9/11 attack. In defence of Islamic community, Dr Zakir Naik introduces how Great Britain and America was affected by the IRA (Irish Republic Army). But the fact is that IRA (Irish Republic Army) terrorist organisation was finished a long time ago and recently, they have not done terrorist attack. Why would Dr Zakir Naik want to bring in something that is old? Apart from that, LTTE (Liberation of Tigers of Tamil Eelam) was brought in front. But LTTE (Liberation of Tigers of Tamil Eelam) only causes problems to Sri Lanka and they have finished. Also, they did not spread their ideology all through out the world. The Islamic terrorism had started a long time and ago and they are still on going and there is no end to it. I believe this is one of the ways to victimise other religious minorities and make them look like the culprit. On top of that, also make the British media responsible for all this. Despite the evidence are shown, still Dr Zakir Naik comes out with defence on them. But all the information is given by him is orally and no concrete evidence on that is introduced.
Calling people from different religion’s to Public sessions:
Dr Zakir Naik call people called from different religion for discussion. This makes it more obvious to the audience that anything. Also, they would not feel that he is biased and the person brought into the conversation and the public would take more interest. They all have discussion on the religious discussion on the topic raised in the session. Later, they argue on that issue of what is said in the scriptures and how the religious society and community is made. As a result, Dr Zakir Naik is able to win the arguments. The affect of the public is that they believe that he is very knowledgeable on the all the religions comparing to the other people. To my point of view, this is not right because just arguing any point logically and having evidence presented falsely would not mean that they are the winner. Are all the people right all the time of they win the arguments?
When people talk about Dr Zakir Naik?
People are going to be talking about Dr Zakir Naik in public and general conversation as they are influenced by them. As a result, they would make others interested in to what they believe and later they would also follow Dr Zakir Naik. This is just one of the ways people would not follow what they believe and go against their principle. This could against their religion and how they see things. This will only happen because in every session Dr Zakir Naik always goes on about how different topics and is very detailed. I believe this is wrong because other people that are also like Dr Zakir Naik would not be seen by the public and will be ignore. As a result, this is wrong make others turned down in that fashion. Is this going to be a bad influence on other people?
Where does Dr Zakir Naik travel for his purpose?
There are various nations that Dr Zakir Naik has travelled to experience how people in different countries are like. The main logic for Dr Zakir Naik is to have a public session and make people aware about him. As a result, he would involve them and make them as part of those lectures. In the lectures, he would want to discuss what facilities those are in their country and how they are bad influence they to them. Dr Zakir Naik would not even understand anything as in those countries as he himself would not know and just talk about it. Even if the information is not right, he would not bother as the public would follow and understand what his logic and understanding is. Also, those public would be coming often their and they would develop understanding of what he is trying to say. But Dr Zakir Naik does not just want to spread logic round the world but spread Islamic logic and make people think their way. Would it be right to use Islamic logic to have public sessions?
Who comes to be part of Dr Zakir Naik Public sessions?
This makes people from different religion and countries come and listen as all this may relate to them. This results Dr Zakir Naik to be a lot famous in front of the people that belong to different cultures and community. Does Zakir Naik have any rights to famous that way? In the nation wherever they live, they would not follow the rules and regulation as part of that religion and would look for changes in those nations. In certain nation, they have their own logic and ways to deal with thing. I totally do not see point that Zakir Naik should make any comments of everything. Also he would not have the full knowledge what happens in different countries. As a result, their conflicts and be a problem to those areas. This is just a way that Dr Zakir Niak is going to cause a dispute and problem overall by spreading irrelevant logical reasons.
How do people react after listening to Dr Zakir Naik?
People are brainwashed of what he says in the public sessions. As a result, in future only his logic would be used by people. This would people see ways differently and not understand their own belief, cultures and background, which they come from. Those people become so dedicated and all follow his logic. Does anyone even bother to look at why Dr Zakir Naik thinks of anything that way? The problem occurs when others get affected by these types of thought and later produces disturbance all through out.
People in the public end up converting their religions:
Dr Zakir Naik in all of the conversation has mentioned about the Islamic community and what benefits they have. Also to produce more depth in the information discusses about how the Islamic community function with the community, society and community. In contrast says a lot opposite about other religion and community. In the audience, this would influence many people against other religion and also go against their religion. This would result to extent that they would convert their religion to Islamic community. This has taken place in the public session that he has and ask them of they have not being forced. But the fact is that they have been forced and they are not going to admit that in public as they know the result later on for them could be bad. Also, they are brainwashed about Islamic community and they happen to follow Islam. Many British, Americans, Australian and many different citizens have converted to Islam and they are successful Islamic scholar and have discussion on what Islam is all about afterwards. Also in Hinduism, many cases people have been forced to convert to Islam and they are not originally from the Islamic community. Previously, many Hindus have been forced to convert to Islam. In Dr Zakir Naik public session, this has been the same result and many of them have taken the similar step. I would like to ask that how many people belonging to Islamic community have converted to other religion. This is because; if atheist can convert to Islam that apply many restriction to them, then why cannot people from Islamic community converted to atheist? As a result, they would have much more freedom and also would keep balance on what Islamic community take, they can also give. If not atheist, then other different religion, they can covert to. There are various Muslims in the world that are not strict Muslims and do not going the Quran like other Muslim. But is says in the holy Quran that if any Muslim converts to another religion, they are going to be given a death sentence. Is this not just going to develop Islamic community and turn down other religions?
Negative impact of Dr Zakir Naik on different people and professions:
On all discussion, Dr Zakir Naik introduces negative information on politician, religions, Media and so on that all happens to be wrong. To my point of view, it is just going to be defaming people and their profession. The information presented is always one sided by him and introduce nothing positive about the same topics. This would influence the public to think only one side and not allow them to use their own initiative. If any dispute between communities or religious minorities happen, Dr Zakir Naik would blame others and defame them. This would make it obvious in terms that he would always have logic used all the way through. In contrast to all this, it is only Dr Zakir Naik that is gaining honour and getting away. As a result, he is quite successful in terms how the audience is responding to him. This also allows him to continue on what he believe is right to do all the time. Is this right way to use the knowledge? Dr Zakir Naik also came on NDTV 24X7 in the “Walk the Talk” show. Later he denied what he had said in the news and said that the whole of show was cut and pasted. Can anybody believe Dr Zakir Naik? In this issue it is possible that the media for the audience attraction, they may lie. But in many cases Dr Zakir Naik have done the same and ruined people and professions. As a result, I cannot believe that Dr Zakir Naik is right as on many occasions he has made up opinions. There are people that have bad opinion on him, would believe that anything mentioned negative about him in the media would have to right. It is obvious that Dr Zakir Naik would not agree with that and would counter argue to self defend himself.
May result religious dispute between two different communities for example Genocide?
This can cause a religious dispute between two different cultures because on many occasions he has only talked positive about Islam and negative about other religions. The effect of this on the community has been negative at some point. If is gets a lot worse, he can create genocide between two communities and have people killing each other in the name of religion. Dr Zakir Naik wants communities to be closer and live happily in the society. But certain actions have caused damages to many people are not happy about it because only he himself and Islamic community have earned the benefit. Are the people from other communities not going to feel abused? As a result, two different communities are going to have dispute and later spread disturbance all round. Even if the situation gets worse for the two different communities, it will be again that Dr Zakir Naik would come and have public session and blamed other and get away for that causes. But the real culprit would be he himself. In future, different communities would not appreciate help and mixture of others, which would result worse atmosphere. In response to all this, I would see he is one of Blasphemers that people in the community, Muslims and Non-Muslims have as risk.
Dr Zakir Naik using different ways to attract the audience:
When I had gone on Your Tube, I had seen many different videos on Dr Zakir Naik’s public discussion on the religious topics. This implies that there are many different ways he is trying to pass his message to the audience. To my point of view, I believe this is one of ways; he is trying to catch people and brainwash. In the commenting section, many different people have given positive comment on his logic. But in contrast, I have seen many people giving negative comments on his video. This illustrates that many people do not like the way as he is using his knowledge and they want all this to stop. Moreover the people that do not like him, they have also made video of him to introduce his way of logic is not right. In that case, I believe those type of videos produced against him, should be understood why they are made. This would enlighten people not to fall in his trick and believe what he says. Also, I would recommend the owner of the Your Tube to eliminated his video for as they are relating to Blasphemy.
Dr Zakir Naik doing Fraud:
On having so many public sessions, Dr Zakir Naik has earned a lot of respect on what he believes people in the community think of him. Later, the news had come out that he had been charged with fraud. The fraud involved using the quotes for the Quran and copying and pasting and giving his own point of view. This implies that he has plagiarised someone work and effort, and tried to earn his name. To my point of view, wherever anybody does as part of their work, they need to have their own knowledge and understand. Using other people’s knowledge for your purpose is known as stealing and anybody who lives in respective community and society would not appreciate that. It also makes me believe that all the public sessions that he has are nothing and have no value because; he had been carrying this type of approach all the way through or exaggerating information. Dr Zakir Naik was going to come to Britain to have a public session. But he was not refused to come and was not able to make it. The reason why he was banned because of the way he was spread his Islamic logic all the way and on the public this was a band influence. I believe that this was the right approach to make the people think how his attitude can cause a problem. There were few people that were not happy but mainly, they were people that belong to the same community has him. It makes it much worse if the religious community that he belongs to in questioned because; they would feel pinpointed. To my point of view, I believe that these types of people should be thrown out the community and society.
Public have different point of view of Dr Zakir Naik now:
After seen different point of views, many people also have negative opinion on Dr Zakir Naik and believe that in many ways he is wrong. This has created his negative images in front of the people that are dedicated to him and believe that he just wanted to be their god in front of them and use them. In response, not just Non-Muslims but, many Muslims disagree with him and the way his attitude towards the society and community is. This may imply people that his approach has not been right been right. The public at some point believe that he has been a cheater to them and believe that he was just wanted to get noticed by the public. He was a doctor and studied MBBS (Bachelor in Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery). So did he not continue with practicing his medicine degree? This can just mean that he was not happy with his profession or found it hard to cope with it. As a result, he decided to become a preacher in that case and later take that as a different approach. Dr Zakir Naik could have been someone in the society and community that would have treated normally. But this type of response has given him a bad impression overall at some point.
How people in the world are and what Dr Zakir Naik talk about them in public sessions?
There are people that have their own way to deal with things and are able to keep themselves safe from all the problems. As a result, he had made a lot of personal comments on how people live the community and society. It is important to make sure that you stay safe and respect people in the community and society. Also cultures and religion for the people plays a major role in terms of their dedication and I believe many people do show respect. But personally, I think people have their own lives and they have full rights to live how they like to on their agreement of the community and society. If in the middle of the road, somebody has a problem, are they not going to ask for help without looking at what they are and who they are? This demonstrates people understand that if somebody live life different, does not mean that they do not have humanity. On this issue, I am able to come across Dr Zakir Naik is so interested in discussing on how people to people can be a threat and introducing a lot of superstition. As a result, I think that Dr Zakir Naik has no rights to talk about people.
Political power that Dr Zakir Naik may have:
If Dr Zakir Naik gets away after all this, it will be politics in terms of what type of support he has. Also many people support him and if anything happens to him, the public that are very dedicated to him, will protest for him. Also with him, there are other systems that would be in his contact and can do something to support him. In political purpose even if people are wrong they will get away easily or if they are caught, they would be have other higher people that could have put their effort behind them, which would save them. As a result, these people would have no end till the others are caught as well. I would suggest the community and the people in the society to stay away form this type of people are concentrate in how to follow you culture, religion and faith. There is no need to compare religions
Conclusion on what I think should happen to Dr Zakir Naik?
As conclusion, I believe that however Dr Zakir Naik has behaved in the public sessions as a blasphemer should be penalised from doing that and stopped appearing in front of public for public sessions. Moreover, a police complaint and the case should be filed on his name and press serious chargers. On the basis of that, he should be given a serious punishment for his deeds. It is not only Dr Zakir Naik that has been part of this but, may other Islamic Scholar have been involved in this and they should be given the same punishment. This would imply to anybody not to become a blasphemer like him and treat people from different community and religion with respect. The community that have been following him, does not realise that he has been creating problems for others. Most of the problems have come when he had talked about religious comparison, religious scriptures and political issues. In the entire topics he had always used Islamic logic and diverted the public’s attention on them. In contrast, made others turned down. If in future they should only have religious scholar discussing about their own religion, religious scriptures, society, community, belief and so on. This will keep peace and harmony in the community and make others feel a lot satisfied that way.

aslam o alikum .

mr zakir nayek allah may comlete your and oyr mission the truth of islam. may allah help you .don t leave it. thanks

HI
I AM RIZWAN……. GUJRAT PAKISTAN
ZAKIR NAIK IS A GREAT HERO OF ISLAM. BUT AS A MUSLIM WE SHOULD LISTEN HIM AND THEN RESEARCH ON THAT THING WHICH HE SAY….. IF IT IS ACCORDING TO ISLAM WE SHOULD ADOPT IT OTHERWISE LEAVE IS AS IT IS…….

Million Million Non-muslims are focusing towards ISLAM ,and Mr.Zakir Naik declared Muhammed as a Messenger and Allah as 1 GOD – any one saying him Kafir or Agent of Yahood with out any Proof are playing with fire and indeed fall into the Pit..

GOD Bless (Real)Muslims – .

My ancestors are from Pakistan and i love Pakistan well Pakistaniz make a Joke of Religion ISLAM and destort the Image as well –

east to west – Saudia Arabia is the BEST !!!

IF HE SAYS SOMETHING,THEN HE PROVES IT.IF PATEL WRITES A VERY LENGTHY COMMENT TO DENY DR ZAKIR,IT SHOWS THAT HIS KNOWLEDGE IS VRY WEAK AND HE JEALOUSES FROM A GREAT DR.PATEL TRIED TO SPIT ON SUN,BUT THIS MADE HIS OWN FACE DIRTY.

IF DR SB SAYS THAT USAMA IS NOT A TERRORIST,THEN WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS.NO ONE CAN GIVE ME A SINGLE PROOF WHICH CAN PROVE THAT HE WAS A TERRORIST.IF AMERICA SAYS THAT USAMA IS TERRORIST,IT CANNOT BE A PROOF AS AMERIC IS THE KILLER OF HUMANITY.AMERICA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LACS OF DEATHS OF MUSLIMS IN IRAQ,AFGHAN,PAKISTAN,LIBIA,AND SOMALIA.

SO,DR ZAKIR SB IS GREAT HERO AND TRUE PEOPLE REALLY RESPECT HIM.IF SOMEONE IS JEALOUS LIKE MR PATEL,THEY ARE REMOTE CONTROLLED BY OTHERS AND DONT HAVE THIER OWN THINKING AS THEMSELVES ARE GREAT FOOLS.

PLEASEEEEEEE~~~~~~~~~~~

WATCH THIS
FIRST
BEFORE ANY DECISION

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YGgETf3o1g&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALIw41C6Lcg&feature=related

Dear Brothers of islam please get out of targetting each other and dfeclearing each other Kafir or Mushrik and join hands to set an unflinching unity against all the enemies of Allah and your enemies.
As for zakir Naik is concidered atleast he is better then millions and billion of we Muslims by prsenting the Islam with so strength and convictions that is not liked by our enemies and they feel rejoiced when they can air our diftences. there are diffrent factions in cristianity and jews and hindus but they try not to air these so please let Allah be the judge and not declair any one kafir.
and support zakir in his actions.
FOR ZAKIR BHAI ONLY
DR DEEDAT WHEN EVER ASKED TO GIVE FATVA HE USED TO REPLY THAT I AM STUDENT OF COMPARITIVE RELIGION ASK THESE QUESTIONS FROM UR SHIEK. BRITHER WE ARE VERY MIOPIC PLEASE DONT BE DIS HEARTED AND CONTINUE YOUR JIHAD BILLISAN WE ALL PRAY FOR YOU.

this is just a spy web against mr.zakir.and those who say that he is a succesor of yazed.those people are namrod of this era.i love u naik. aur mein ap ke nokar ban,na bhe apne lye bais.e.fakhar samjhte hun.

I THINK PEOPLE WHO R OPPOSING HIM DONT REALIZE THE NUMBER OF NEW PEOPLE WHO NOW SAY “LA ILAHA ILLALLAAH MUHAMMADUR RASOOLULLAH(SAAW)” BECAUSE OF DR. ZAKIR NAIK. I DONT THINK ALLAAH LIKES THEIR PROTEST.

My humble doctor don’t mind the critics, keep on spreading ISLAM more grease to your elbow, GOD bless.

Truth will prevail. Allah will always be on the side of the truthful.

Whats wrong with dr.zakirnaiks comments abt rasoolullah sallallahu alhi vaslam.Even i readed from some hadeeth that rasoolullah also told i can’t do anything if u ask me.allah only can do everything.

THESE ULAMAS R THE BIG CRIMINALS USING ISLAM TO FULFILL THEIR ICONIC IMAGE INFRONT OF PEOPLE.WHAT THEY DONE FOR ISLAM TILL THESE DAYS NOTHING.ONLY THING THEY R DOING TILL NOW IS GIVING POSES FOR THE ELECTIONS LIKE THEY R THE ISLAMIC LEADERS, AND EARNING MONEY FROM THE POLITICIANS.

I ALSO LITTLE BIT KNOW ABT THIS MUFTIS FROM DEVBAND MADARASA,JUST EAT AS MUCH AS THEY WANT AND ASKING PEOPLE WERE IS UR BEARD?IF U DONT HAVE LONG BEARD U R NOT MUSLIM,ONLY THEY R DOING THIS.

Dr.Zakir naik Iis the only person i can say doing something what ALLAH and Rasool said.keep going zakir saab allah knows u very well ignore this sleep speakers.

As for as the case of Dr. Zakir naik is concerned, I am totally in opposition with the views and thoughts of those who say that Zakir bhai is wrong.He is not wrong, He is the only person in the present Islamic world who preaches the true Religion.Look at his studies, Lectures, Style of preaching, what a great person. Its a great mercy of Allah upon us who sent such a great scholar. Please study his books, lectures, Then you shall know what he preaches.

Inshallah! haq jete ga or batel hare ga. ham sub musalman dr. zakir naik k seth hen haq or batel ki is larahi main.

i just read all the above comments,and i reach on the reality that whenever a person do something good for Islam he will safe a lot of difficulties,PLZ first analyze the person deeply and then give comments.

What truely dedcribes extremists and its practioners violent,cruel,fundamental,blasphemous,who dony approve othet religions ,against humanity,find no difference betwen animals and nonbelievrs,kill and eat animals.Today they r majoriyy but someday but will get reduced to smallnumbers and killed by USA and its allied forces……..because change is tje only thing remains contants..religious scriptures failed the test of times b it any…….save urself from the cancer.ie…..religion…u all r fools disusing meaningless issues…..figting to prove god…nobody has seen him ….All rxtremists are terorists just check the statistcs…..And moderates are truely reformists….They deserve to live on this earth

I work in oman and hindu and love my religion,after working with arabs, i find there is no problem with arabs,pakistanis they are good people but indian muslims are fraud and engage in activities which are unislamics .This zakir naik and his family was schedule caste as he cannot leave his hindu family name “naik” ,may be his forefathers had converted to islam to escape the hindu caste system, as a grand children he has rage in his blood ,so he abusing hindus and trying to create uncomfortness. if he is so much knowledgable about islam then he should become the chief priest at AL-Haram mosque in saudi and try to get saudi passport instead of applying for british.

and then he should try to solve the shia & sunni problem in the arabworld ,instead of putting finger in hindus.

As a hindu ,i am very sorry to say that pakistanis are far better than indian muslims of bombay origin,our media and leaders should understand.

15 years back i had got a book named THE BIBLE THE QURRAN IN THE LIGHT OF SCIENCE. written by Dr.William Camble. while reading i reached at the stage where it was written that holy Qurran has 30 errors. Of course I hung up and dumb founded reading about it. I read and read again and again with a sheer logical way all 30 errors were mentioned. I spinned being a true mislim I could not belive. I know it was absurd but i had no logical answers. I tried to bring in contect some islamic scholors but all in vain. they were not able to prove the logical accusation but hanky panky because they were Mufties but not knowledgable, educated elites. for 15 years i had been in restless. I did not find any islamic scholor around the world who had courage to defeat and call spade a spade to Dr. Camble. pity was that the books were taught in many universities. Alhamdullah a man was born. 2 years back he visited America and invited Dr. William Canble to debate and defeated him. I watched that 9 hours programme and was very much glad and joccond to see Dr. Zakir Naik dashed down Dr. Willium Camble. and asnwered all 30 errors logically. shame on those muftis who could not do for years. secondly, when i listned Dr. Zakir says Yazeed (rehmal ullah) i was realy confussed but i quickly could not reach to conclusion so i took ‘hadit’ and the reference quoted by Zakir Naik I saw he was true. then I confussed more that I had been doing wrong for years that I though Yazeed was wrong.

I am non muslim but i love dr zakir so much! I love u naik! Umma!!