A tribute to Maulana Ubaidullah Sindhi: Most eminent representative of Deobandi Islam – by Abdul Nishapuri
Currently while there is a dearth of visionary, committed and selfless Muslim scholars who could lead the disillusioned and misguided Muslim youth to serving Islam, Pakistan and overall humanity in a constructive manner, it is pertinent to present a description of the life, contributions and works of Maulana Ubaidullah Sindhi.
In Maulana Sindhi’s person, we have one of the most impressive representatives of the Deobandi ideology and its services to Islam and the subcontinent. LUBP readers will appreciate that Maulana Sindhi’s ideology is way different from a violent sectarian and jihadi agenda currently adopted by some Deobandis scholars in Pakistan (e.g., Jamaat-e-Islami, JUI, Sipah-e-Sahaba, Jaish-e-Muhammad etc).
We hope that all Muslims, particularly those influenced by a violent Talibanic (jihadi and sectarian) agenda, will take out some time to read this article, to develop a non-violent, non-sectarian and future-oriented understanding of the Deobandi school of though. (Abdul Nishapuri)
……….
Biography
Early Life
Maulana Ubaidullah Sindhi (10 March 1872-22 August 1944) was a noted pan-Islamic leader a political activist of the Indian independence movement.
Ubaidullah was born on March 10, 1872 to a Sikh family at Chilanwali, in the district of Sialkot (now in Pakistan). His father Ram Singh Zargar died 4 months Ubaidullah was born, and the child Unaidullah was raised for the first years of his life under the care of his grandfather.
Following the latter’s death when Ubaidullah was two years of age, he was taken by his mother to the care of his maternal grandfather’s house.
Ubaidullah, was after sometime, entrusted to the care of his uncle at Jampur when his grandfather died. It was at Jampur that young Ubaidullah received his initial secular education.
Islam and Deoband
Ubaidullah converted to Islam early in his life and later enrolled in the Darul Uloom Deoband.
When he was at school, a Hindu friend gave him a book “Tuhfatul Hind” to read. It was written by a convert scholar Maulan Ubaidullah of Malerkotla. After reading this book and others, Ubaidullah’s interest in Islam grew, leading eventually to his conversion to Islam.
In 1887, the year os his conversion, he left for Sindh where he was taken as a student by Hafiz Muhammad Siddque of Chawinda. He subsequently studied at Deen Pur under Maulana Ghulam Muhammad where he delved deeper into Islamic education and training in mystical order.
In 1888 Ubaidullah was admitted to Darul Uloom Deoband, where he studied various islamic disciplines at depth under the tutelage of noted Islamic scholars of the time, including Maulana Abu Siraj, Maulana Rasheed Gangohi and Maulana Mahmud al Hasan. He took lessons in Bukhari and Tirmidhi from Maulana Nazeer Husain Dehlvi and read Logic and Philosophy from Maulana Ahmad Hasan Cawnpuri.
In 1891, Ubaidullah graduated from the Deoband school. He left for Sukkhur, and started teaching in Amrote Shareef. He married at this time the daughter of Maulana Azeemullah Khan, a teacher at Islamiyah High School.
In 1901, Ubaidullah established the Darul Irshaad in Goth Peer Jhanda in Sindh. He worked on propagating his school for nearly seven years. In l909, requested by Mahmud al Hasan, Ubaidullah returned to Deoband. Here, he accomplished much for the student body, Jamiatul Ansaar.
Ubaidullah was at this time very active in covert anti-British propaganda activities, which led to him alieniating a large part of the Deoband leaders. Subsequently, Ubaidullah moved his work to Delhi at Hasan’s request. At Delhi, he worked with Hakeem Ajmal Khan and Dr. Ansari. In 1912, he established a madrassah, Nazzaaratul Ma’arif which achieved much in the field of propagating Islam.
Pan-Islamic Movement and the Focus on Freedom of India
Ubaidullah gradually involved himself in the pan-Islamic movement. During World War I, he was amongst the leaders of the Deoband school who, led by Maulana Mahmud al Hasan, left India to seek support of the Central Powers for a Pan-Islmaic revolution in India in what came to be known as the Silk Letter Conspiracy.
Ubaidullah reached Kabul during the war to rally the Afghan Amir Habibullah Khan, and after brief period, he offered his support to Raja Mahendra Pratap’s plans for revolution in India with German support.
He joined the Provisional Government of India formed in Kabul in December 1915, and remained in Afghanistan till the end of the war, and left for Russia. He subsequently spent two years in Turkey and, passing through many countries, eventually reached Hijaz (Saudi Arabia) where he spent about fourteen years learning and pondering over the philosophy of Islam especially in the light of Shah Waliullah’s works.
He was one of the most active and prominent members of the faction of Indian Freedom Movement led by Muslim Clergy chiefly from Islamic School of Deoband. Ubaidullah Sindhi died on August 22, 1944. (Source: Wikipedia)
Afghanistan
With the onset of the World War I, efforts emerged from the Darul Uloom Deoband to forward the cause of Pan-Islam in India with the help of the Central Powers. Led by Mahmud al Hasan, plans were chalked out for an insurrection beginning in the tribal belt of North-west India.
Mahmud al Hasan, left India to seek the help of Galib Pasha, the Turkish governor of Hijaz, while at Hasan’s directions Ubaidullah Sindhi proceeded to Kabul to seek the Emir Habibullah’s support. The initial plans were to raise an Islamic army (Hizb Allah) headquartered at Medina, with an Indian contingent at Kabul. Maulana Hasan was to be the General-in-chief of this army.
Ubaidullah himself was preceded to Kabul by some of his students. While at Kabul, Ubaid Ullah came to the conclusion that focussing on the Indian Freedom Movement would best serve the pan-Islamic cause. Ubaidullah’s proposed to the Afghan Emir that he declare war against Britain.
Maulana Ubaidullah Sindhi and Mahmud al Hasan (principle of the Darul Uloom Deoband) had proceeded to Kabul in October 1915 with plans to initiate a Muslim insurrection in the tribal belt of India. For this purpose, Ubaidallah was to propose that the Amir of Afghanistan declares war against Britain while Mahmud al Hasan sought German and Turkish help. Hasan proceeded to Hijaz.
In late 1915, Sindhi was met in Kabul by the Niedermayer-Hentig Expedition sent by the Indian independence committee in Berlin and the German war ministry. Nominally led by the exiled Indian prince Raja Mahendra Pratap, it had among its members the Islamic scholar Maulavi Barkatullah, the German officers Werner Otto von Hentig and Oskar Niedermayer, as well as a number of other notable individuals. The expedition tried to rally Emir Habibullah to the Central powers and through him begin a campaign into India, which it was hoped would initiate a rebellion in India.
On December 1, 1915, the Provisional Government of India was founded at Habibullah’s Bagh-e-Babur palace in the presence of the Indian, German and Turkish members of the expedition and friends. It was declared a revolutionary government-in-exile which was to take charge of independent India when British authority had been overthrown. Mahendra Pratap was proclaimed President, Barkatullah the Prime minister, Ubaidullah Sindhi the Minister for India, another Deobandi leader Maulavi Bashir its war Minister, and Champakaran Pillai the Foreign Minister. It obtained support from Galib Pasha and proclaimed Jihad against Britain. Recognition was sought from Tsarist Russia, Republican China and Japan.The Government would later attempt to obtain support from Soviet leadership. After the February Revolution in Russia in 1917, Pratap’s government corresponded with the nascent Soviet government. In 1918, Mahendra Pratap met Trotsky in Petrograd before meeting the Kaiser in Berlin, urging both to mobilise against British India.
However, these plans faltered, Habibullah remained steadfastly neutral while he awaited a concrete indication where the war headed, even as his advisory council and family members indicated their support against Britain. The Germans withdrew in 1917, but the Indian government stayed behind at Kabul. In 1919, the government was ultimately dissolved under British diplomatic pressure to Afghanistan.
Ubaidullah stayed in Kabul for nearly seven years. He encouraged young King Amanullah Khan, who took power after Habibullah’s assassination, in the Third Anglo-Afghan War. The conclusion of the war, ultimately, forced him to leave as Amanullah came under pressure from Britain.
Russia and Turkey
Ubaidullah proceeded to Soviet Russia, where he spent seven months at the invitation of the Soviet leadership, and was afforded official treatment as a guest of the state. During this period, he studied the ideology of socialism. He was however, unable to meet Lenin because he (Lenin) was severely ill at the time. It is thought that Sindhi was impressed by Communist ideals during his stay in Russia.
In 1923, Ubaidullah left Russian for Turkey, where he initiated the third phase of the Waliullah Movement in 1924. He issued the Charter for the Independence of India from Istanbul. Ubaidullah left for Mecca in 1927 and remained there until 1929. During this period, he brought the message of the rights of Muslims and other important Deeni issues to the masses.
Death
In 1936, the Indian National Congress requested his return to India and subsequently permitted to return. He remained at Delhi, where he began a programme teaching Shah Waliullah’s Hujjatullahil Baalighah to Maulana Akbarabadi, who would then write an exegesis in his own words. Ubaidullah left for Lahore to visit his daughter in 1944. At Lahore, he was taken seriously ill and died on 22 August 1944 at Deen Pur (location: Khanpur,Near Rahim Yar Khan, District Bahawalpur).
(Adapted from Wikipedia)
……….
Comments by Maulana Saeed Ahmed Akbarabadi
Maulana Saeed Ahmed Akbarabadi describes the return of Maulana Ubaidullah to Delhi after his exile thus:
“All the people proceeded to the Delhi station to await his arrival. I had conjured up an image of Maulana by looking at the present leaders. I expected him to have a turban on his head and to be wearing a juba (robe). He would be a passenger of the first class, he would at least have one servant with him, at least 2-3 heavy suitcases, a heavy bedding, 2-3 flasks, 3 -4 heavy receptacles of food and majesty and grandeur apparent on his countenance. However, when the train reached, all these thoughts were left stagnant. The people frantically began searching the first and second -class coaches. Meanwhile, a man with nothing on his head, wearing a kurta of coarse cotton cloth with a coarse sheet around his neck emerged from the third class. Those who recognised him immediately ran towards him. This was Maulana Ubaidullah Sindhi. The hair of his beard and head was completely white. He was about 65 years old. People began searching for his goods, but where did he have any luggage? Whatever was on his body was all that he owned. I have not seen a person and probably will not see in future one who has renounced material pleasures so totally”.
Once Maulana came from Okla to Delhi (a distance of approximately 8 miles) on foot during a hot day. He returned on foot as well because he did not have sufficient money to board the bus. Maulana Saeed Akbarabadi comments that he (Maulana Ubaidullah) did not mention this to anyone nor could they realize this from his countenance. Someone who came by bus saw him walking and when Maulana was asked if he had indeed come walking, he admitted doing so. In addition, because of having to travel on foot he had to leave very early that day. As the food was not yet ready when he departed, he had to forgo the meal, which he only had after Asar in Delhi. This is the mettle, which he was made of. He made a programme of teaching Shah Waliullah’s Hujjatullahil Baalighah to Maulana Akbarabadi who would then write an exegesis in his own words. Thereafter he had to leave for Lahore to visit his daughter. Here he fell seriously ill and died on 22 August 1944.
……….
Ubaidullah Sindh’s Writings
حکومت الہیہ کے مدعیوں سے ایک سوال
میں ہندوستان کی مختلف مسلمان جماعتوں سےایک سوال کرنا چاہتا ہوں۔مجھے اس بات کا اعتراف ہے کہ ان میں سے ھر ایک جماعت اس امر میں کوشاں ہے کہ وہ قرآن کے اصولوں پر ہندوستان میں حکومت الہیہ قائم کرے۔لیکن سوال یہ ہے کہ اس قرآنی حکومت کا ان کے ذہن میں تصور کیا ہے۔گزشتہ ادوار میں مسلمانوں کی یہاں جو ھکومت تھی وہ باہر سے آنے والے مسلمانوں کےبل پر عمل میں آئ تھی اور انہی کی ضرورتوں کے مطابق ان کا قانون تھا۔جب باہر سے آنے والے ان مسلمانوں کی طاقت ختم ہوگئ اور ان کانافذ کردہ قانون بحی برسر پیکار نہ رہا۔تو اب جس نئ حکومت کو بنانے میں ہماری یہ مسلمان جماعتیں کوشاں ہیں اسے خیال سے عمل میں لانےمیں کون سا معاشرہ اور طبقہ ممد و معاون ہوگا۔ظاہر ہے یہ نئی اسلامی حکومت ہندوستانی مسلمانوں ہی کی مدد سے بن سکتی ہے اور واقعہ یہ ہے کہ ان کی بیشتر تعداد یہاں کے اصل باشندوں کی ہے،جو مسلمان ہوگئے ہیں،اب اگر کسی جماعت کو سچے دل سے اس ملک میں اسلامی حکومت بنانے کی دھن ہے تو اس کے لئے لازمی ہے کہ وہ یہاں کے مسلمانوں کے فطری رجحانات اور آج کے زمانے کی ضروریات کو سمجھے اور ان کے مطابق قرآنی حکومت کی تفصیلات پیش کرے۔جب تک یہ نہیں ہوگا ہندوستان میں اسلامی اصولوں پو کسی نظام کا قائم کرنا ممکنات میں سے نہیں۔
اورمیں یہ کوئی انہونی بات نہیں کہ رہا تاریخ اسلام میں قومی رجحانات شروع ہی سے موجود رہے ہیں۔ایک مشہور حدیث ہے کہ الائمۃ من القریش یعنی امام قریش میں سے ہوں ،
امام شاہ ولی اللہ کے نزدیک رسول اکرم صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم کی بعثت کی دو حیثیتیں ہیں۔
ایک نبوت عمومی اور دوسری اس کے ذریعے قریش کی سعادت و سربلندی۔قومی رجحانات و خصوصیات کا انکار فطرت کا انکار ہے اور جو نظام اس قدرتی جذبے کا خیال نہیں رکحتا’وہ کبھی دیرپا ثابت نہیں ہوتا۔
از افادات و ملفو ظات مولانا سندھی مطبوعہ سندہ ساگر اکادمی لاہور
Source
………….
Ubaidullah Sindhi – by Sultan Imran
Suggested readings:
- Mawlānā ʻUbayd Allāh Sindhī : Hālāt-i zandagī, taʻlīmāt awr siyāsī afkār
- by Muḥammad Sarwar. Publisher: Lahore, [1976]
- Khutbāt o maqālāt-i Maulānā ʻUbaidullāh Sindhī. murattib Muḥammad Sarwar. Lahore: Sindh Sagar Academy[1970]
A quiz for youngsters:
مولانا عبیداللہ سندھی
سوال: مولانا عبیداللہ سندھی کب پیدا ھوۓ؟
جواب: 1872ء میں ضلع سیالکوٹ کے ایک سکھ گھرانے میں۔
سوال: بتايۓمولانا عبیداللہ سندھی نے کن کتابوں کے مطالعہ کے بعد اسلام قبول کیا؟
جواب: احوال الاخرة ( مصنف حافظ محمد لکھوی) الہند ( مصنف مولانا عبیداللہ) اور تقویتہ الایمان ( مصنف سید اسمعیل شہید)
سوال: مولانا عبیداللہ سندھی کی تاریخ وفات بتايۓ؟
جواب: 22 اگست 1944ء
سوال: مولانا عبید اللہ سندھی نے قبول اسلام کے بعد اپنی روحانی تربیت سندھ کے کس صوفی بزرگ سے حاصل کی؟
جواب: حافظ محمد صدیق بھر چونڈی شریف والوں سے۔
سوال: مولانا عبیداللہ سندھی نے کس ہندو لیڈر سے اٹلی میں پہلی ملاقات کی تھی؟
جواب: پنڈت جواہر لال نہرو سے۔
سوال مولانا عبیداللہ سندھی نے اپنا دینی مدرسہ کہاں قائم کیا تھا؟
جواب: دین پور خانپور میں
سوال: بتايۓ مولانا عبید اللہ سندھی کے دل میں اسلام سے محبت کب پیدا ھوئی؟
جواب: پندرہ سال کی عمر میں۔
سوال ریشمی رومال تحریک کے بانی مولانا عبیداللہ سندھی جن کاانتقال 22 اگست 1944ء کو لاھور میں ھوا تھا کہاں دفن ہیں؟
جواب:دین پور ریاست بہاولپور میں۔
سوال : بتايۓ 1906ء میں مولانا عبیداللہ سندھی نے کہاں داخلہ لیا تھا۔
جواب: دارالعلوم دیوبند میں۔
سوال: مارچ 1939ء میں مولانا عبیداللہ سندھی کتنے سالہ جلاوطنی کی زندگی گزارنے کے بعد ہندوستان واپس آۓ تھے۔
جواب: چوبیس سالہ۔
سوال: مولانا عبیداللہ سندھی کے والد کانام بتايۓ؟
جواب: رام سنگھ
http://www.bahoo.org/Bookdes.asp?productid=1002419&catid=5
I think Obaidullah Sindhi converted form Sikhism so he had an objective view of the religion.
where is Mr.Copy paste today , he might have some stuff against above personality as well, because for him every one in the world is wrong except him
Copy and paste ………Mr. Amir Mughal
imran says: – October 9, 2010 at 2:07 pm where is Mr.Copy paste today , he might have some stuff against above personality as well, because for him every one in the world is wrong except him Copy and paste ………Mr. Amir Mughal
================
Copy and Paste without mentioning the Original Author is called Plagiarism and now go and check all of my posts, yes I do copy and paste and that’s what Researchers do all over the world and they always mention the source.
imran says: – October 9, 2010 at 2:07 pm – where is Mr.Copy paste today , – Copy and paste ………Mr. Amir Mughal
=============
Dear Mr. Imran,
Why don’t you give us some Original Thoughts.
imran says: – October 9, 2010 at 2:07 pm where is Mr.Copy paste today , he might have some stuff against above personality as well, because for him every one in the world is wrong except him – Copy and paste ………Mr. Amir Mughal
==========================
Since you insist! [Public Kay Purzor Israr Par], As per Maulana Wahiduddin Khan [in Asbaq-e-Tareekh] , Late Mawlana Ubaidullah Sindhi’s beliefs changed after reading “تقویتہ الایمان ( مصنف سید اسمعیل شہید” and this book is basically a Urdu version of Kitab At Tawheed by Shiekh Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab [For Mr. Imran, do read these two books and know what Mawlana’s Aqeedah was? and after reading these two “please review your own post” which was posted on another thread
“QUOTE”
“imran says:October 8, 2010 at 10:10 am All deobandis are not terrorist but all religious terrorist in Pakistan are deobandis, Deobandis/salfis are Khawrij of present era.
“UNQUOTE”
Now you should start following Mawlana Ubaidullah and do also read as to what the Shias, Barelvis and even some Sufi Deobandis says about the Favourite Books of Mawlana mentioned above.
@Mr.Amir Mughal
Humans have weaknesses by default, it is how God created them,one way is that if by and large positive characteristics are associated with certain personality and he/she had contributed positively to the society and to fellow human beings then despite of the some weaknesses ,one can still rate that personality on overall basis as a positive contributor. Other way is to only highlight weaknesses (which might be true as no one is perfect) to such an extent that it overshadows positive characters of that personality as well. I am sorry to say but you are a keen follower of second methodology. Now instead of copy and pasting sentences from my writing to quote them out of the context , share your original thoughts
and no copy paste please…
imran says: October 9, 2010 at 3:25 pm and no copy paste please…
================
Watch me doing it again and again. 🙂
imran says: October 9, 2010 at 3:25 pm I am sorry to say but you are a keen follower of second methodology.
=================
That’s the way it is.
imran says: – October 9, 2010 at 2:07 pm where is Mr.Copy paste today , he might have some stuff against above personality as well,
================
Since I am Mr Copy and Paste therefore go and read the Thoughts of “Ubaidullah Sindhi” about the second Arrival of Jesus [PBUH] and Arrival of Imam Mehdi [both Shia Mehdi and Sunni Mehdi – Ummah is not even united about the Sect of Imam]
Dear Imran and Aamir
First of all please dont indulge in personal rants here.
Second thing, Judging persons by Aqeedah is not a right way, Ubaidullah Sindhi adopted Islam his religion and Sindh his homeland.
Many Sindhi personalities as Abdul Majeed Sindhi, Deen Muhammad Wafai, Abdul Wahid Halipota were influenced by his thoughts and political ideas, renown Sindhi intellectual Ghulam Mastafa Qasmi also was influenced by his thoughts.
And if someone want to know what Sindhi has said about Ibne Wahab, check his book, “Shah Waliullah aur Inki Siasi Tehreek”, the book can be downloaded from aboutquran.com.
Thanks Abdul for posting this, the page you have taken Urdu excerpt from was created by me, but could not find time and energy to update it on regular basis.
aliarqam says: October 9, 2010 at 10:50 pm Dear Imran and Aamir First of all please dont indulge in personal rants here.
==================
Dear Mr Durrani,
You must behave yourself before comparing me with Imran and using the word “Rant” and go through the message again and read who started this.
aliarqam says: – October 9, 2010 at 10:50 pm Dear Imran and Aamir First of all please dont indulge in personal rants here.
=======================
For Mr. Imran and “Moderator” too: Deoband and Terrorism 08 February 2010 http://criticalppp.com/archives/5604 read post number 7, and now read
Aliarqam says: February 9, 2010 at 2:53 pm Amir Sb…. Sorry for Ur copy pasting with closed eyes….U dont even know who Sufi Muhammad is…..Is he Deobandi????
Read him once more: Aliarqam says: February 9, 2010 at 3:00 pm Read the article from Amir Husaini and then reflect…..Avoid “Copy Paste”
Read him even now: Aliarqam says: February 11, 2010 at 1:36 pm Thanks For the insights……..
aliarqam says: October 9, 2010 at 10:50 pm Second thing, Judging persons by Aqeedah is not a right way,
======================
LUBP has been “Criticizing” JI, Mawdudi and others [Binnori Town/Qum/Naeemia/Farhat Hashmi/Taqi Rafi Usmai] on their Aqeedah???
aliarqam says: October 9, 2010 at 10:50 pm the book can be downloaded from aboutquran.com.
==================
From the same website http://aboutquran.com/ba/ba.htm , don’t forget to read these “Masterpieces” [Read “Sakht Anti Shia books”]
Mazhabi Dastanein Volume I, Volume II, Volume III, Volume IV (Urdu)Religious Tales: Facts and Fiction (English
translation of Selected artciels from Mazhabi Dastanein)
Shab-e-Baraat aik Tahqeeqi Jaiza (Urdu)
Aqeeda Zahoor-e-Mahdi (Urdu)
Aqeeda Eisale Sawab Quran ki Nazar main (Urdu)
Tahqiq Omar-e-Aisha
Age of Aisha
Suhaba Karam Quran ki Nazar mein (Urdu)
aliarqam says: October 9, 2010 at 10:50 pm the book can be downloaded from aboutquran.com.
=================
From the same website http://aboutquran.com/ba/ba.htm , don’t forget to read these “Masterpieces” [Read “Sakht Anti Shia books”]
Tahqiq Syed wa Sadaat (Urdu)
Khilafat-e Muawiya wa Yazid (Urdu)
Tahqiq-e Mazeed – Khilafat-e Muawiya wa Yazid (Urdu)
Haqiqat-e Khilafat wa Mulukiyyat (Urdu)
Exclusively for Mr. Imran.
Mawlana embraced Islam after reading “Maulvi Ubaidullah’s Tohfatul Hind, and after becoming Muslim he named himself “Ubaidullah”, and after becoming Mulsim he witnessed “Qabar Parasti and Pir Parasti (Grave Worshipping & Saint Worshipping), he thought! what’s the difference between Hindus and Muslims in view of Polytheistic Practices (Shirkiya Aamal) so he read “Taqwiyatul Iman by Mawlvi Shah Ismail and now Mawlana Ubaidullah became “Staunch Muslim – Pukka Musalaman” and then he read Ahwalul Aakhira by Mawlvi Muhammad Sahab Lakhoki Walay.
[More read in Mauj-e-Kausar by Sheikh Ikram published in 1962 by “Idara-e-Saqafate Islamiya Lahore and also Asbaq-e-Tareekh by Mawlana Wahiduddin Khan]
“That’s the way it is.”
then do not call your self researcher, you simply wanna defame people and your copy paste stuff should be taken in same context
imran says: October 10, 2010 at 2:22 am then do not call your self researcher, you simply wanna defame people and your copy paste stuff should be taken in same context
====================
Read the latest “Cut and Paste” above and by the way the Moderator has himself posted the Article on Mawlana Ubaidullah Sindhi by cutting and pasting from here and there.
imran says: October 10, 2010 at 2:22 am then do not call your self researcher, you simply wanna defame people
===================
Then file a Law Suit against LUBP for writing this:
“quote”
LUBP presents a collection of articles and video clips compiled by Aamir Mughal, one of LUBP’s most valued readers and researcher on the subject of election rigging in Pakistan. – Abdul Nishapuri says: October 10, 2010 at 2:05 am This is most comprehensive piece of research on this topic. Thanks, Aamir, for making an effort to exposing and confronting the anti-democracy establishment in Pakistan. Thanks, Laila, for edits and posting.
“unquote”
Dear Aamir
Thanks for reminding me my previous statements, I am impressed by your insights, no doubt, the way U have collected and compiled the archives, the most comprehensive on the web space,but the way you present it in the comments section, I have never agreed as the comment section is for discussing aspects of the article, visitors views sharing and responses by the author or moderator of the site, who put the article on the Site.
In your cluster of comments leave a very little space for other to response.
Actually your comments work like Google phenomena, U put a term and respond to it, as I have referred to aboutquran, and U have atarted your rant against Shias, you forgot to mention(though it will also be irrelevant to mention) that the same site has books available of Sir Sayyed, Amir Ali, Taha Hussain, Qasim Amin and many others, but you chose the ones by Abbasi-Kandhalvi group. As per your religious inclination.
I have never agreed to these ways and tactics, but you have your own choice of expressing yourself.
imran says: October 10, 2010 at 2:22 am then do not call your self researcher, you simply wanna defame people and your copy paste stuff should be taken in same context
====================
Understand the difference between Researcher and Scholar.
I never said that I am an Scholar and Researcher could be wrong and right as well because Research depends upon the available Data and when someone quote source,reference,books [bibliography] then he/she can use the “Title” i.e. Researcher.
I am still waiting for an Original Article from you. By the way where did I defame “Mawlana Ubaidullah”
Admin3 says: October 10, 2010 at 2:30 am U have atarted your rant against Shias, you forgot to mention
=====================
I have not wrote a single word against Shia above.
Admin3 says: October 10, 2010 at 2:30 am As per your religious inclination.
================
Define and explain your statement.
Admin3 says: October 10, 2010 at 2:30 am U have atarted your rant against Shias – As per your religious inclination.
===================
Avoid using this word Rant because I am quite capable of using more harsh words and now define my “Anti Shia Sentiments and as per you Rant in the light of the comment in the post below: Talibanisation of the heart — by Dr. Abbas Zaidi 24 August 2010 http://criticalppp.com/archives/21850
Admin3 says: October 10, 2010 at 2:30 am you forgot to mention(though it will also be irrelevant to mention) that the same site has books available of Sir Sayyed, Amir Ali, Taha Hussain,
====================
Would Shia Community accept the views of Sir Syed about Mehdi and Maseeh???? And by the way read Deobandis on Taha Hussain and Mawdudi as well.
Admin3 says:- October 10, 2010 at 2:30 am In your cluster of comments leave a very little space for other to response. Actually your comments work like Google phenomena, U put a term and respond to it
=========================
Then I would request the Site Owners to remove my posts, an “Alleged” Designation i.e. “Researcher” from this website. So that you can carry on your good work.
“Researcher”
end result of research is that each and every person is wrong except “researcher”
each and every person from beginning of universe till now is wrong except one genius “researcher”
imran says: – October 10, 2010 at 4:00 am “Researcher” end result of research is that each and every person is wrong except “researcher”
=====================
Wrong again. You can drawn any conclusion after reading any Research because Research is not an Ultimate Truth rather a study based on available and published Information.
“available and published Information” highlighting weaknesses only, just forget 98 good characteristics of a personality and gather all information about 3 bad characteristics and then start copy pasting
imran says: October 10, 2010 at 4:37 am “available and published Information” highlighting weaknesses only, just forget 98 good characteristics of a personality and gather all information about 3 bad characteristics and then start copy pasting
====================
Taqwiyatul Iman and Kitab At Tawheed are not appreciated amongst Barelvis and Shias and even some Deobandis and in Pakistan every citizen is equal. How come Mawlana Ubaidullah is relevant in 21st century Pakistan with so rigid “Favourite books” and I wonder if you have read these books.
@Amir Mughal
i have not written that in context of Ubaidullah Sindhi, i am describing your way of “Research” in general, i know all those issues between Brelvis and wahabis and book of Shah ismail Dehlvi..i have even listened to some whabais disowning shah ismail and his writings”Agar Shah Sahib nay likha hay tu wo khud zimaydaar hein, Shah Sahib Humaray Liye Hujjat Nahi hein” these were words of one wahabi debater in a “Munazara”
anyway thats not my issue, my point is your “research” to defame every single person from beginning of universe till now and just highlighting only weak points in a certain personality
by the way i am not a follower of Shah Ismail or Ubaidullah Sindhi, what i am pointing out your way of research..nothing else
imran says: – October 10, 2010 at 5:11 am my point is your “research” to defame every single person from beginning of universe till now and just highlighting only weak points in a certain personality – what i am pointing out your way of research..nothing else
========================
Any Mullah or his Ideology in a society like Pakistan which is multi-sectarian is detrimental and that’s why I revealed some aspects of Mawlana Ubaidullah Sindhi which are not acceptable to the overwhelming majority of Pakistanis.
imran says: October 10, 2010 at 5:08 am i have even listened to some whabais disowning shah ismail and his writings”Agar Shah Sahib nay likha hay tu wo khud zimaydaar hein, Shah Sahib Humaray Liye Hujjat Nahi hein” these were words of one wahabi debater in a “Munazara”
===============
Where? Any Name? Place, Youtube video? Book. To avoid such Manazras 🙂 Religion and Mullahs should be restricted to Masjid, Imam Barghahs and Jamat Khana.
yes video is there on youtube, wahabi manazir is Talib Ur Rehman, but instead of diverting the topic and starting debate on Aqaid of ismail dehlvi and conflicts with brelvis , just keep the discussion on our reserach methodolgy which has only one purpose to prove every one wrong and proving that only one genius super “Copy Paste” research is right
imran says: October 10, 2010 at 5:33 am just keep the discussion on our reserach methodolgy which has only one purpose to prove every one wrong and proving that only one genius super “Copy Paste” research is right
=====================
Prove me wrong 🙂
imran says: October 10, 2010 at 5:33 am just keep the discussion on our reserach methodolgy which has only one purpose to prove every one wrong and proving that only one genius super “Copy Paste” research is right
==================
Yes and watch and read me doing that again.
Deobandi is the most “confusing lot” amongst all Mullahs because everybody knows where Wahabis [Ahl-e-Hadith/Salafis], Barelvis and Shia stand but you would never be able to tell what is ideology of “Gulabi Wahabis i.e. Deobandis” they believe in Sufism but condmen Barelvis for the same, they condemn Bida’ats but have themselves introduced many. They condmen Secular Democratic System and go through their History and find that they always find “Peace” amongst Secular Politics – They are the worst opponents of Jamat-e-Islami but off and on sit with them too. Eternal Darkness of the Unimaginative MULLAH Mind http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/10/eternal-darkness-of-unimaginative.html
imran says: October 10, 2010 at 5:33 am just keep the discussion on our reserach methodolgy which has only one purpose to prove every one wrong and proving that only one genius super “Copy Paste” research is right
====================
Now tell me why the Shia School of Thought was never consulted during “Objective Resolution” which is basically a negation of Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s principles i.e. Secular and every citizen is Equal. Why the Objective Resolution was prepared by A Deobandi Shabbir Ahmed Usmani and helped by Suleman Nadvi [both Sunnis and severely Anti Shias] and yet you say that I have no praise for anybody.
imran says: – October 10, 2010 at 5:08 am @Amir Mughal
my point is your “research” to defame every single person from beginning of universe till now and just highlighting only weak points in a certain personality
======================
After reading this do tell me that should we even discuss Old Relics on LUBP: Secular Republic or Islamic Republic of Pakistan http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/10/secular-republic-or-islamic-republic-of.html
Note: I am extremely thankful of Mr Abdus Sattar Ghazali for this post above.
“Now tell me why the Shia School of Thought was never consulted during “Objective Resolution” which is basically a negation of Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s principles i.e. Secular and every citizen is Equal. Why the Objective Resolution was prepared by A Deobandi Shabbir Ahmed Usmani and helped by Suleman Nadvi [both Sunnis and severely Anti Shias] and yet you say that I have no praise for anybody”
———————————————————
Now start copy pasting stuff against Shias written by deobandis Mr. “Researcher” it is more like a character still exists in Pakistan called “Faffay Kutni” and this is the right term for you
imran says: October 10, 2010 at 6:26 am Now start copy pasting stuff against Shias written by deobandis Mr. “Researcher” it is more like a character still exists in Pakistan called “Faffay Kutni” and this is the right term for you
================
You didn’t get me in my earlier posts where I meant that Deobandi-State Connivance has made life a hell for Non Deobandis particularly Shias and Ahmedis.
The word is Phappay Kutni.
and after that start copy pasting stuff against deobandis written by shias and brelvis
and then start copy pasting stuff against brelvis written by wahabi and deobandis
“Faffay Kutni” aka Researcher
imran says: October 10, 2010 at 6:30 am and after that start copy pasting stuff against deobandis written by shias and brelvis – and then start copy pasting stuff against brelvis written by wahabi and deobandis
================
That’s how I expose these Mullahs who talk about “United Ummah, Kashmir, Arz-e-Muqqaddas and what not” and never hesitate to issue Fatwa against each other.
“That’s how I expose these Mullahs”
this is not how expose Mullahs, this is how you prove to be a “Faffay Kutni”, you can also start copy pasting stuff against Kahmiris written by indians
imran says: October 10, 2010 at 6:30 am and after that start copy pasting stuff against deobandis written by shias and brelvis and then start copy pasting stuff against brelvis written by wahabi and deobandis
===================
I don’t even have to do that because they have already did it: Read their Fatwas against each other: Here lies the so-called Muslim Ummah! – 1 http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/11/here-lies-so-called-muslim-ummah-1.html
Here lies the so-called Muslim Ummah! – 2 http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/11/here-lies-so-called-muslim-ummah-2.html Here lies the so-called Muslim Ummah! – 3 http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/11/here-lies-so-called-muslim-ummah-3.html
and then start copy pasting stuff against Indians written By jamat e Islami, then start targeting Jamat e Islami from quoting someone else
this is you do best for ecah and every person…for you it is research, just exploiting conflicts between different sects or different nationalities and different religions and only concentrating on negative points to add your share to increase these conflicts with your so called research
imran says: October 10, 2010 at 6:40 am this is not how expose Mullahs, this is how you prove to be a “Faffay Kutni”
================
Do you have better suggestion then I am all ears and until you find another methodology, enjoy this Cock Fight.
Who is Muslim in Pakistan? anyway! – Deobandi Mazhab:1/4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyf5FlzDInI&feature=PlayList&p=785443104913A02A&playnext_from=PL&playnext
Who is Muslim in Pakistan? anyway! – Ahl-e-Hadith is exposing Jamat-e-Islami – Jamat Islami and Moulana Moududi’s corrupt Manhaj http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IJ8OQoFsjg
Jamat Islami and Moulana Moududi’s corrupt Manhaj-part2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylx8_GvWuFk&feature=related
Who is Muslim in Pakistan? anyway! Ahl-e-Hadith is exposing Jamat-e-Islami Iqamat-E-Deen Aur Jamaat-E-Islaami – 1/7(Urdu)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdxccyRJtMs&feature=PlayList&p=47B7EBBC5529BEFA&playnext_from=PL&playnext=1&index=16
Who is Muslim in Pakistan? anyway! Ahl-e-hadees Deobandion ka postmortem, part 5 of 8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ixq1YXKskL8&feature=related
MORE SHAME: Deobandi Pir Criteria: [18+]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKDauS2im_Q&feature=related
Tariq Jameel & Taqi Usmani kay Kufriya Aqaid-Real face of Deoband Exposed http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pOvJhg6Puo&feature=related
Tariq Jameel Ki Haqeeqat
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxETGx91GQw&feature=related
you are no different than those mullahs , they are surviving because of these conflicts and “copy paste” researchers like you also running their shop because of those conflicts
imran says: october 10, 2010 at 6:47 am this is you do best for ecah and every person…for you it is research, just exploiting conflicts between different sects or different nationalities and different religions and only concentrating on negative points to add your share to increase these conflicts with your so called research
================
That’s the way it is.
A glimpse: Darul Uloom Deoband Founder Ashraf Ali Thanvi Sexy Molvi http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cay47oW-FnI
Rental Power Plant. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nar2Q17jI4o&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrrPkL8wo14
Blasphemy by Barelvis: Refutation of Brelviat 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTZALzZjvQY&feature=related
Cock Fight between Barelvis and Wahabis [Ahl-e-Hadith/Salafi]:New Munazarah Gumrah or Gustakh Koun hai? 22 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uozD9H_dF_Y&feature=related
imran says: October 10, 2010 at 6:47 am and then start copy pasting stuff against Indians written By jamat e Islami,
==========================
No I wouldn’t have to take help from Jamat-e-Islami to expose Indians atrocities, I prefer the help of “Kaafir Farangis” to expose Indians [Kaafirs]
‘We Have No Orders To Save You’ – State Participation and Complicity in Communal Violence in Gujarat APRIL 30, 2002
http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2002/04/30/we-have-no-orders-save-you
State officials of Gujarat, India were directly involved in the killings of hundreds of Muslims since February 27 and are now engineering a massive cover-up of the state’s role in the violence, Human Rights Watch charged in a new report released today. The Indian parliament is scheduled today to debate the situation in Gujarat, and may vote to censure the Indian government for its handling of the violence. The police were directly implicated in nearly all the attacks against Muslims that are documented in the 75-page report, ‘We Have No Orders to Save You’: State Participation and Complicity in Communal Violence in Gujarat. In some cases they were merely passive observers. But in many instances, police officials led the charge of murderous mobs, aiming and firing at Muslims who got in the way. Under the guise of offering assistance, some police officers led the victims directly into the hands of their killers. Panicked phone calls made to the police, fire brigades, and even ambulance services generally proved futile. Several witnesses reported being told by police: “We have no orders to save you.”
imran says: October 10, 2010 at 6:47 am and then start copy pasting stuff against Indians written By jamat e Islami,
================
Read and Watch “Cut Paste Documentary on India’s involvement in Sri Lanka’s worst Nightmarish Civil War [I don’t need the help of Jamat-e-Islami]:) enjoy
Tamil Tigers [LTTE], Israel and India – 1
http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/10/tamil-tigers-ltte-israel-and-india-1.html
Tamil Tigers [LTTE], Israel and India – 2
http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/10/tamil-tigers-ltte-israel-and-india-2.html
“enjoy”
i do not need to see and analyze events through your glasses constructed with copy paste materials..
neither i enjoy these conflicts , this only a Faffy Kutni like you can enjoy
imran says: October 10, 2010 at 7:23 am i do not need to see and analyze events through your glasses constructed with copy paste materials..neither i enjoy these conflicts ,
==============
How do you conduct your Research on any event “good or bad” without quoting [copy pasting as per you] from different sources. Do you receive “Influx” 🙂
========
imran says: October 10, 2010 at 6:47 am and then start copy pasting stuff against Indians written By jamat e Islami,
==========
This Report is not from Jamat-e-Islami but from a Kaafir Judge on the Treatment Muslims Receive in India, read – In March 2005 Prime Minister Manmohan Singh appointed a high level committee to prepare a report on the Social, Economic and Educational Status of Indian Muslims. The 7-member committee, headed by Justice Rajinder Sachar (retired) submitted its report to the Prime Minister in November 2006. http://minorityaffairs.gov.in/newsite/sachar/sachar_comm.pdf
imran says: October 10, 2010 at 6:47 am and then start copy pasting stuff against Indians written By jamat e Islami,
================
This is also not from Jamat-e-Islami but Top BBC Correspondent “Mark Tully”
Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindrenwale (1947 – 1984) – 1
http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/10/sant-jarnail-singh-bhindrenwale-1947.html
Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindrenwale (1947 – 1984) – 2
http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/10/sant-jarnail-singh-bhindrenwale-1947_31.html
Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindrenwale (1947 – 1984) – 3
http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/10/sant-jarnail-singh-bhindrenwale-1947_2964.html
The personality of hazrat Ubaidullah Sindhi’s is unforgettable .Hazrat Sindhi’s work to worda indepebdence of India is commendable .We should follow him ,read his work deeply and get lesson .
ماڻهو جنهن شيءِ کي مقدر چون ٿا، ان کي آءُ “حالتن” جو نالو ڏيان ٿو، اهي حالتون آهن جيڪڏهن منهن مٽي بيهي رهن ته جي پوکن سي لڻي ئي نه سگهن، ڪن هڪڙا ۽ لوڙڻ ٻيا! سور سهن هڪڙا ۽ سک ڏسن ٻيا!!!
مولانا عبيدالله سنڌيءَ کي به اهڙي مقدر سان منهن ڏسڻو پيو، مزي جي ڳالهه اها آهي جو سنڌ جي سياسي تاريخ ۾ ٻه ماڻهو “سنڌيءَ” جي نالي سان مشهور ٿيا، ٻنهي آزاديءَ جي تحريڪ ۾ اڻ ڳڻيون تڪليفون ڏٺيون، ٻئي پرخلوص ۽ بي لوث ٿي رهيا ۽ ٻنهي سان قوم وڻندڙ سلوڪ نه ڪيو، هڪ کي چريو چيو ويو ۽ ٻيو ذري گهٽ چريو ٿي ويو، انهن مان هڪڙو مولانا عبيدالله سنڌي ۽ ٻيو هو شيخ عبدالمجيد سنڌي.
مولانا عبيدالله سنڌي ننڍي کنڊ جو اهو پهريون ۽ واحد سياستدان هو جنهن هندستان مان فرنگين جي ناپاڪ پاڇي هٽائڻ لاءِ پاڻ کي جلاوطن بڻايو، در در جون ٺوڪرون کاڌيون، پنهنجي دور جي سپر پاور خلاف منظم منصوبا بڻايا، جوڀن ۽ جوانيءَ جا ڏينهن جڏهن هو پنهنجي وطن ۾ گذاري رهيو، تڏهن هن کي آزاديءَ خاطر وطن جا وڻ ڇڏڻا پيا ۽ موٽيو تڏهن جڏهن جهور پوڙهو ٿي چڪو هو.
“ڪراڙو اٺ ٻه ڪنواٽ لهي” جي مصداق پوءِ به هن همت نه هاري، هن جي جواني ٻڍاپي ۾ تبديل ٿي چڪي هئي، ليڪن هن جوانن جي جوش ۽ ٻڍڙن جي هوش کي ملائي جهان بيني، تجربن، آزمودن ۽ مشاهدن کي اڳيان رکي ساگر پارٽي ٺاهي، پنهنجي پارٽيءَ جي پوئلڳن جي تربيت شروع ڪئي ۽ آزاديءَ جي نعمت حاصل ڪرڻ لاءِ هر اول دستو ٺاهڻ شروع ڪيو، مولانا عبيدالله سنڌي به هندستان جي ورهاڱي جي ڳالهه ڪئي مگر مذهب جي بنياد تي نه پر ٻولي، تهذيب ۽ ثقافت جي بنيادن تي! ليڪن هڪ طرف حالتون بدلجي چڪيون هيون ۽ ٻي طرف سندس حياتيءَ جا ڏينهن به اچي پورا ٿيا، ان ڪري سندس حسرتون، اميدون ۽ خواهشون ائين ئي اڌريون رهجي ويون. هن هيٺ انهيءَ عظيم انسان جي هڪ تقرير ڏجي ٿي._ڊاڪٽر در محمد پٺاڻ
انسان ڪا معيار زندگي ، امام انقلاب عبيدالله سنڌي
انسان ڪا معيار زندگي ، امام انقلاب عبيدالله سنڌي رح.
محمد مقبول عالم(بي اي) تلميذ
املاء جوکيو شفيق احمد مسڪين
حڪيم الهند امام شاهه ولي الله الهندي رح ( امام مخدوم فاضل سنڌي رح اور علامه امام شيخ محمد حياة سنڌهي رح ڪي شاگرد اور شاهه عنايت شهيد سنڌي رح و مخدوم محمد معين ٺٽوي سنڌهي رح ڪي فڪر ڪي حامي هين جوکيو شفيق) 1
حڪيم الهند امام شاهه ولي دهلوي الهندي صاحب رح فرماتي هين ڪه اقتصادي بدحالي اونڄ نيڄ عام لوگون ڪي اخلاقي بربادي ڪا باعث بنتي هين. اس لئي انسان ڪي بنيادي اخلاق ڪي حفاظت ڪي لئي سوسائيٽي ڪا معاشي نظام عادلانه هونا چاهيي، يعني نه تو ايسي مفلس اور نادار لوگ هون جو بنيادي انساني ضرورتون، کهاني ، پيني، لباس، تعليم، صحت وغيره سي محروم هون، اور نه ايسي دولت مند هون جو عياشيان ڪرين بلڪه سب لوگ ايڪ ڀهلائي ڪي لئي بهي سوچ سڪين رفاهه عامه ڪي ڪامون مين حصه لي سڪين اور اطمينان ڪي ساٿهه الله ڪي ياد ڪرسڪين اور آخرت ڪي زندگي ڪي لئي سعادت ڪا سرمايه جمع ڪر ڪي جا سڪين ،چناچه امام شاه ولي الله الهندي انسان ڪي معاشي زندگي ڪي تين درجي بيان ڪرتي هين
،1رفاهيت ناقصه ، ناقصه معيار زندگي جس مين بنيادي ضرورتين پوري نهين هوتين اور انسان ڪماني ڪي فڪر سي آزاد هو ڪر ڪچهه سوچ هي نهين سڪتا
2.رفاهيت بالغه
ايسا معيار زندگي جو تڪلف ڪي حد تڪ پهنچا هوا هو، جس مين انسان فخر ڪا اظهار ڪري اور لازما ايڪ جنس مين سي بهترين ڪا انتخاب ڪري، يه عياشي ڪي زندگي هي، اس مين پڙ ڪر انسان اپني انساني
فرائيض سي غافل هوجاتا هي
3. رفاهيت متوسط
متوسط معيار زندگي جس مين نه عياشي هوتي هي نه بهوک افلاس بلڪ انسان ڪي بنيادي ضرورتين سب پوري هوتي هين اور ڪچهه فراغت بهي حاصل هوتي هي.
رفاهيت ڪي معني هين آسودگي يعني زندگي ڪا معيار جو حيوانون ڪي زندگي سي اونچا هو، جس مين انسان زندگي بسر ڪرني ڪي اچهي طريقه استعمال ڪري اور آرام پائي
انسانيت ڪي ترقي اور بهلائي ڪي لحاظ سي رفاهيت ناقصه اور رفاهيت ٻالغه والي لوگ ناڪاره هوتي هين اور رفاهيت موسطه والي لوگ هي مفيد ثابت هوتي هين اس لئي ترقي ڪرني والا معاشره وه هي جس مين سڀ لوگ رفاهيت مطوسة مين زندگي بسر ڪرين، اس غرض ڪي لئي رفاهيت ٻالغه والون سي وافر دولت ليڪر رفاهيت ناقصه والون ڪو ديني هوگي! تاآنڪه سڀ رفاهيت موسطه ڪي درجه پر آجائين. قرآن حڪيم ڪي معاشي نظام ڪي روح يه هي حڪمت هي، ڪه ساري سوسائيڻي اس سي فائيده اڻهائي.
انسان ڪو اس دنيا مين زندگي بسر ڪرني ڪي سلسلي مين مشڪلات پيش آتي هين عقلمند لوگ، انهين آسان ڪرني ڪي لئي طريقه دريافت ڪرتي هين، ان طريقون ڪو حڪيم الهند امام شاهه ولي الله صاحب الهندي رح ڪي حڪمت مين ارتفاقات ڪهتي هين.
ارتقاق ڪا لفظ رفق سي بنا هي جس ڪي معني نرمي يا نرمي سي ڪام ليني ڪي هين، اس سي مراد يه هي ڪه مشڪلات ڪو نرم يا آسان ڪرني ڪي ظريقي دريافت ڪرنا.
انسان ڪي مشڪلات دو قسم ڪي هين ايڪ معاشي يعني کهاني پيني اور رهني سهني ڪي مشڪلات
اور دوسري فڪري يعني زندگي اور اس ڪي مقصد ڪو سمجهنا وغيره، اس طرح ارتفاقات ڪي بهي دو قسمين بن گئي هين.
1. ارتفاقات معاشيه يعني معاشي زندگي ڪي مشڪلات جو کهاني پيني اور رهني سهني ڪي سلسلي مين پيش آتي هين، انڪي حل ڪي طريقون ڪا نام ارتفاقات معاشيه هي.
2. ارتفاقات الٰهيه يعني فڪري مشڪلات جو ڪائينات ڪو سمجهني، خدا ڪي هستي اور انڪي پهچان، انسان ڪا خدا ڪي ساتهه تعلق، انساني زندگي ڪي مقصد، مرني ڪي بعد ڪي زندگي ڪي لئي تياري وغيره ڪي سلسلي مين پيش آتي هين، ان ڪي حل طريقون ڪا نام ارتفاقات الٰهيه هي
انسان ڪا خاصه يه هي ڪه وه عقل سي سوچتا هي آلات(اوزار) و اجتماع ڪي استعمال سي تهوڙي محنت اور تهوڙي وقت سي بڙي بڙي ڪام سرانجام ديتا هي سوچ بيچار ڪي نتيجي ڪي طور پر ڪه وه ايجادات ڪرتا هي يا دوسرون ڪي ايجادات سي فائيده اڻهاتا هي اور اپني مشڪلات ڪو آسان ڪرتا هي پهر وه عام لوگون ڪي فائيده ڪي لئي بهي ڪام ڪرتا هي اور صفائي نفاست اور خوبصورتي ڪا بهي لحاظ رکهتا هي اس طرح وه اپني زندگي ڪو نهايت آسان، عمده اور خوشگوار بنا ليتا هي، يه سڀ ارتفاقات معاشيه هين، يه ارتفاقات تمام دنيا ڪي انساني معاشرون مين اس ڪثرت سي رائيج هوگئي هين ڪه انڪي زندگي ڪا جز بن گئي هين اور ڪوئي انساني سوسائيڻي ان ڪي بغير قائيم نهين رهه سڪتي چيونڪه آسوده حال لوگ زياده فراغت پاتي هين ان ڪي ارتفاقي زندگي غريبون ڪي نسبت زياده بهتر هوتي هي اور صفائي و نفاست ڪا بهي وه زياده خيال رکهتي هي، اس لئي انڪي ارتفاقات زياده ترقي يافته هوتي هين، ايسي هي عقل والي اپني ارتفاقات ڪو بهتر بنا ليتي هين اور ڪم عقل پيچهي رهه جاتي هين.
امام ولي الله الهندي ڪي تحقيقات ڪي مطابق انسان ڪي ارتفاقي زندگي ڪي چار منزلين هين.
1. ارتفاق اول
يعني ديهاتي زندگي، يه انساني آبادي ڪي پهلي منزل هي اس منزل مين انسان ني کهاني پيني ڪي طريقي دريافت ڪئي، بول چال ڪي لئي زبان پيدا ڪرلي، حيوانات سي ڪام لينا سيکها مڪان بنايا ، لباس ڪا استعمال شروع ڪيا، جذبه جنسي ڪي تسڪين اور نسل بڙهاني ڪي نڪاح ڪا طريقه رائج ڪيا، يه انسان ڪي بنيادي ضرورتين هين، بهترين سوسائيڻي وه هي جس هر فرد ڪي يه ضرورتين بهترين طريقي سي پوري هوتي هون ڪسي سوسائيڻي مين انقلاب ڪي ايڪ بهت بڙي وجهه يه بهي هوتي هي ڪه اس ڪي بنيادي ضرورتين پوري نهين هوتين.
2. ارتفاق دوئم
يعني شهري زندگي جب انسان ڪي آبادي بهڙي تو اس ني بڙي بڙي بستيان بنانا شروع ڪين, آپس مين ميل جول زياده هوا اور ايڪ دوسري ڪي خيالات اور تجربات سي فائيده اڻهايا جاني لگا نيز حب جمال (نفاست)رفاهه عام (عام لوگون ڪي بهلائي) اخلاق فاضله (اچهي اخلاق ) اور حسن معاشرت (اچهي سلوڪ )ڪي اصولون ڪي روشني مين زياده غور ڪيا گيا تو ارتفاق اول ڪي باتون مين زياده صفائي، عمدگي اور سهولت پيدا هوتي گئي، انساني تمدن ڪي اس درجه ڪو ارتفاق دوئم ڪهتي هين، مگر بقول امام شاهه ولي الله انسان ارتفاق دوئم مين اس وقت ترقي ڪرسڪتا هي جب بهوک، پياس اور تسڪين جذبه جنسي سي فارغ هون اور اس ڪي بنيادي ضرورتين يعني ارتفاق اول ڪي تمام چيزين اسي حاصل هون اس سص ظاهر هي ڪه امام شاهه ولي الله ڪي نزديڪ خوراڪ، لباس، مڪان، صحت اور تعليم انسان ڪي ابتدائي ضرورتين هين، جن حاصل هوني ڪي بعد هي ڪوئي بهي سوسائيڻي ارتقاق دوئيم، يعني تمدن ڪي دوسري منزل مين داخل هو سڪتي هي (مولانا عبيدالله سنڌي صاحب جي اختصار سان سمجهاڻي ختم ٿي )1
مآخذه تدريس القرآن ڪراچي،سنڌ
هن کان پوء وارو مضمون هوندو!!!
تقابل اديان، اسلام ڪيا هي ڊاڪٽر احمد حسين ڪمال رح جو معلوم هجي ته ڊاڪٽر موصوف، امام انقلاب مولانا عبيدالله سنڌي رح جي فڪر جو پوئلڳ نيشنلسٽ، سڪيولر مسلم آهي، جديد معاشي سوچ جو ماڻهو آهي، نهايت ئي عادل انسان آهي، هن موصوف ٻاهتر واري سنڌي ٻولي جي حمايت ڪئي هئي، حالانڪ موصوف اردو اسپيڪنگ آهن، اسان هن موصوف جي عدل کي سلام ٿا ڪريون، هن جون اڪثر لکڻيون، عادلانه هونديون آهن، الله تعالي هن تي پنهنجي رحمت نازل ڪري.
جوکيو شفيق احمد
اپريل ، 2005
پير سيدنا امام محمد راشد روضي ڌڻي ابن سيدنا امام محمد بقاء شاهه رحمهما الله تعالي عليه، پير جو ڳوٺ، ضلع خيرپور، سنڌ وارن جو ٻن واسطن يعني حفيظ الملة حافظ محمد صديق رح ڀرچونڊي شريف ضلع سکر، سنڌ ۽ شاهه حسن سوئي رح، سنڌ وارن سان مريد ۽ شهيد اعظم سنڌ شهيد سورهيه بادشاهه ۽ شهيد الله بخش سومري رح جو فڪري دوست، ريشمي رومال تحريڪ جو روح روان، ڇويهه سال جلاوطن انقلابي مولانا عبيدالله سنڌي رح،جنهن کي پاڪستاني آمريڪي ايجنٽن ۽ ڏاڙهيء ۽ غير ڏاڙهي وارن ملن، روس جو ايجنٽ دهريو ۽ ڪافر قرار ڏنوهو؟ جن ملن جو الله تي پنهنجو ايمان ئي ڪونه هيو!!!؟
http://profjokhio.blogspot.com/2010/11/blog-post_2458.html
Maulana Sindhi’s work towards independence of India is commendable .We should follow him ,read his work and learn lesson.
My late father wrote his 1st book on Maulana in 1942. He was his student, while he was in Mecca.
I have few unpublished writings about Maulana.
Salman Sarwar
My late father’s 1st book was on Maualan Sindhi in 1942. Maualan’s contribution towards independence of India is commendable.
My father spent few years in Mecca with him as his student.
Salman Sarwar
Ubaidullah Sindhi (1872-1944) -39 may be deemed as the harbinger of Deobandi activism in the Punjab and Sind. Born to a Sikh parentage from Sialkot, Ubaidullah Sindhi embraced Islam at the tender age of 15 in Muzaffargarh on 29 August 1887. In September 1888, he went to Deoband and came under the tutelage of Maulana Mehmud ul Hassan (1851-1922) who was instrumental in stirring Deobandi movement to political activism. Ubaidullah proved himself worthy of Mehmud ul Hassan’s attention, when he successfully formed Jamiat ul Ansar, a student body at Deoband in 1909. It was meant to
organize Deobandi scholars both in the country and outside as well. Besides setting up a madrasa, Dar ul Irshad (established in 1901) in Goth Pir Jhanda, Nawab Shah district in Sind and Nazarath ul Maarif (established in 1912) in Delhi, he also played a pivotal role in Tehrik i Reshami Roomal, a silk letter conspiracy in 1915. This movement merits a mention here because of two reasons; one, the area of its operation was mostly the Punjab, and second, it provides us a first testimony of Deobandi activism in the region. Through a collaborative effort with Amir Amanullah Khan, the ruler of Afghanistan, the plan was hatched to oust the British from India with the help of Turkey. Ubaidullah Sindhi was overseeing the operational side of that movement. Unfortunate for Deobandi activists, the whole plan was leaked out and most of those involved were arrested. Although it may not be altogether correct but one may assert that despite the failure of the Tehrik i Reshami Roomal, Punjab had a taste of anti-colonial misadventure which was a Deobandi undertaking. 40
39 For a detailed biographical account of Ubaidullah Sindhi, see Maulana Ubaidullah Sindhi, in Mufti Abdul Khaliq Azad, ed., Khutbat wa maqalat, (Lahore: Dar ul Tehqiq wa Ishaat, 2002), pp.19-87.
40 For detail see I.H. Qureshi, A Short History of Pakistan (Karachi: University of Karachi, 1988),
pp.839-40.
http://www.gcu.edu.pk/FullTextJour/Hist/V3N205/P28-50.pdf
Salam,
I am reading the comments and was amazed by the simplicity of the argument taken specially between IMRAN and AAMIR MUGHAL. Aamir keep giving reference to articles which he believe changed Mulana’s life. But i for once could not find anywhere what he has changed into. All i hear and read about the process of transformation but not the results which in this case were very and only important thing to be discussed.
I am writing about Malay Muslims in Southern Thailand. Some of them studied at the
Sawlatiyyah College in Mecca where Ubaydullah al-Sindi taught in the 1920s.
I would be grateful if I could be informed in what years Ubaydullah taught at the Sawlatiyyah. Did he leave any writings in Urdu that touched on the Sawlatiyyah College and his years in Makkah al-Mukarramah?
Dr Dennis Walker [ [email: dennis.walker@monash.edu ]]
A tribute to Maulana Ubaidullah Sindhi: Most eminent representative of Deobandi Islam – by Abdul Nishapuri
[url=http://www.gmn0d76w092bg9koaz075az39qk58s81s.org/]uxtefcwksj[/url]
xtefcwksj http://www.gmn0d76w092bg9koaz075az39qk58s81s.org/
axtefcwksj
Is that true? Ill spread this information. Anyway, good posting.
99年新課綱
Is that true? Ill spread this information. Anyway, nice posting.
林曉萍
hello
that’s nice posting.
iPhone
hello
it’s good posting.
教師考試
hello
it’s nice posting.
數學科
Is that true? Ill spread this information. Anyway, nice posting.
南一版