I am not hesitant to say that the concept of Jihad and the utopian state thereon, put forward by the likes of Maulvi sayied in 1857 in Delhi , Ottoman empire at the fag end of its reign , Mulla Omar in Afghanistan and Reagan backed Zia regime in Pakistan ,has always proved to be an instrument to gain, maintain or extort power , by religio- political parties. This has neither ever been accepted by the majority nor will it work now in the contemporary Muslim world. This is an anti thesis of modern political culture and even the spirit of religion itself. The Egyptians will soon realize their mistake .Their president is very likely to create another Afghanistan in the Middle East to much relief of poor Pakistanis . The Muslims all over the world have to clearly differentiate between sin and crime and restrict the state to take care of crime and criminals only, instead of trying to play God by punishing the sinners.
Our own countries’ right wing political elite has to understand that the critical mass of Pakistanis has always been pluralist, tolerant and proud of the constructive values which they learned during one thousand years of slavery of various sultans , moghals and finally the British , who at least were honest enough to open the doors of modern knowledge to the natives.
I am not advocating the rightfulness of this piece of legislation or out rightly rejecting the viewpoint of judiciary but I want the people at large to be fully conscious of the fact that in a democracy , the parliament is supreme and can always make laws which are in accordance with the constitution. Even if the legislature attempted to make any law which the judiciary considered un-constitutional , it could always be sent back to the legislature for reconsideration before being declared ultra vires . In this particular case, there were a number of useful provisions which could have been allowed to continue. It would not have mattered much if the judiciary had suggested appropriate amendments instead of rejecting the legislation in equal haste in which these laws were passed for very obvious reasons. The judges will have to come to terms with the reality that the peoples party has always won the masses’ favor through the ballot box and that too not without any non-tangible reasons.
Moreover the judiciary will have to preserve its status of representatives of western law, instead of proving themselves as Qaziz of the times of muslim monarchs. This is high time that the judiciary revisits the infamous SGS –Cotecna and the subsequent NRO case once again and consider the following facts on the basis of existing law.
Firstly , the SGS case was fabricated and launched by an ehtesab bureau which was headed by a shady character who never qualified for the job just like Adnan Khawaja whose appointment is sub judice these days. Secondly, Despite all the hue and cry of the media and political midgets for the last twelve years, No court in Pakistan has been able to convict any of the accused even when they were dying to do the same. (please refer to the tapes of justice qayyum ,saifur-rehman and shehbaz sharif etc on the web media ).
The steep rise and fall in collection of Customs duties during and after the withdrawal of pre-shipment assessment of customs duties justifies the subsequent unforgiving steps of a compliant judiciary and most affected vested interest groups. The table below clearly reveals who were the beneficiaries of the immediate abandonment of pre shipment inspection and assessment of the goods by SGS and Cotecna . These figures also indicate how did this group of customs officials/ judges/industrialists , traders and petty importers took revenge by launching the Swiss and other cases against those who dared to marginalize the criminals.
COLLECTION OF CUSTOMS DUTIES (Rs in millions)
|| (-) 0.7
|| (-) 3.2
|| (-) 13.5
|| (-) 12.4
|| (-) 5.6
Sources: Pakistan. Central Board of Revenue. CBR Year Book 1992-93. Islamabad, 1994. p. 72
Pakistan. Central Board of Revenue. CBR Year Book 1993-94 & 1994-95. Islamabad, 1996. p. 89
Pakistan. Central Board of Revenue. CBR Year Book 1998-1999 & 1999-2000. Islamabad, 2001. p. 146