Shakal say hee maila lag raha hay! bloody pervert

Gilani is set to destroy PPP. Majlis e shoora destroyed Pakistan

it is vital that we finish corruption in the country. politicians need to come forward with a clean heart and finally work for the interest of country!!

Without prejudice to Dr. Ayesha’s stand that appointment of such an important post like Auditor General of Pakistan, the nominated person/s should be a man of integrity, nonetheless, there is a thin line between accusation and integration. A universal maxmim of justice is audi artem partem (hear the other side).

I happen to watch a talk show where Buland Akhtar Rana was contacted online and explanation to accusations against him so highlighted by Dr. Ayesha Siddiqa, was sought for. What I gather from Mr. Rana’s explanatory reply is:

1. The sexual harrasment charges could never be proved and the charge stands dismissed
2. The ISI report is based on the apprehention that perhaps Mr. Rana would not compromise on transfers of unutilized budgeted fund under different civil heads to the Military account in the name of Defence strict requirement and would unnecessarily raise objections
3. He never had more than one Pakistani passport. The two passports attached to one another, one is old and expired. He was sent to Canada on deputation and this special assignment required to travel on a special passport which was surrendered as and when he returned.

Let me declare loud and clear that I never knew and perhaps would never know this gent called Buland Akhtar Rana. If he had a dubious character in real and still the government was desirous to appoint him on such a sensitive post, it would have been a worst kind of nepotism. But, to condemn a person on hearsay is also not justified. When some person declare that this man is black but he says he is white, a dispute has been created and the issue can only be settled in a court of law.

That the case of sexual harrassment was not proved is a classic example of how Currupt people are protected by this Govt.

The fact of the matter is that Akhtar Buland Rana was posted as Chief Controller Military Accounts in GHQ. The controller Military Accounts Karachi , a lady, was one of his subordinates. He ,for months, kept on pressing her to accompany him to Pannu Aqil Cantt “” to relax “”. MAG ,Raja Gul Muhammad, apponted Mr. Ghulam Ambia, a grade 20 officer withimmaculate reputation, as inquiry officer. The charge was established.

When the case was sent by MAG to the Auditor General, The Auditor General appointed Mr. S.M.Arif, another honest officer, to investigate. The accused, however, “requested ” PM to appoint an officer outside Audit Department. The PM appointed Mr. Ishtiaq Khan , the then Additional Secretary Cabinet Division, as inquiry officer. He “”exonerated “” the accused. Mr. Ishtiaq Khan immediately after this great deed was promoted to grade 22 and posted as Secretary Election Commission.

First of all Mr. Rana explained in detail in his live interview and Ayesha Siddiqa was also present in the studio that he went to Canada first on Ex Pakistan leave with government’s approval and during his leave he obtained Canadian citizenship. He also explained in detail how he has two id cards and multiple passports. These passports are not illegal or fake, they are under the same name, expired and issued by government.

On the case of sexual harassment what Fareeda Malik said is true somewhat but not completely. Mr. Rana was asked by that lady officer that why is he going there for almost a week so Mr. Rana said that after that inquiry I’ll relax there for bit. That relaxation part was strictly for himself. Later he asked that lady officer that why don’t you join us for the inquiry. That was the comment which was taken as harassment. I think subordinate has to accompany their officers for any official inquiry. You think that lady officer had not accompanied any officer out of town before.

One more thing which most of people are not familiar with that the lady officer belonged to the group who did not want Mr. Rana to have any inquiry because many big names were involved in that corruption case. Plus that lady officer was very close friend of a high position GHQ officer who himself wanted to come forward and take the seat of Auditor General. All they wanted was to defame Mr. Rana so he can never get any promotion and get out of their way. They tried their best to maneuver all the reports against Mr. Rana.

On the comment of Canadian citizen inside GHQ.. if it is that critical then it should be in constitution that no government official can have dual nationalities. If there is no such thing then you can not blame anyone for having dual nationalities. And Pakistan’s sensitive defense installations are never attacked by Canadians. Those are different political games and most of well informed people know what they are and what for.

Mr.Rana never went to Pannu Aqil to hold any inquiry.

He has been clarifying to all his colleagues that ” when he asked the lady to accompany him to relax, he did not mean any thing bad” In the inquiry conducted by Mr.Ghulam Ambia it was established that he said this to the lady officer.

Mr.Kamran Fiaz is right when he says that constitution does not mention about dual nationality. Mr. Rana must take oath as Auditor General of Pakistan because luckily constitution does not also mention that a person using multiple passports during the same time period can not hold a constitutional post. Instead of Chief Justice of Pakistan the oath should be conducted by the Queen because to obtain Canadian citizenship Akhtar Buland Rana has already taken the following oath:

“”I swear that I will be faithful
and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty
Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada,
Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will faithfully
observe the laws of Canada
and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen””

What is Mr Kamran Fiaz ‘S view on the letter issued by Ministry of Interior the subject of which is “Undesirable activities of——-“?
———————
No. 7/102/2010-FIA
Government of Pakistan
Ministry of Interior

Islamabad, the 10thFebruary, 2011
The Director General,
Immigration & Passport
Islamabad .

SUBJECT: UNDESIRABLE ACTIVATES OF EX CMA OFFICER (ENQUIRY NO. PC-376/2010-FIA, AHTC, ISLAMABAD

Dear Sir,
I am directed to say that an enquiry was conducted by FIA against Mr. Muhammad AkhtarBulandRana, Deputy Auditor General (BS-21), an officer of Pakistan, Audit and Accounts service and to say that PISCES Record of FIA reveals that he holds two national identity cards, 27215-2270858 and 36302-36357279 and three Pakistani passports KB274440, KB274550, AA9797271 and a Canadian passport JQ-104864, which were used by him at different times during his traveling abroad during the periods from April 2004 to December 2009.

It is requested to take disciplinary action against the defaulters who issued three passports and additional/dual CNIC to Mr. Muhammad AkhtarBulandRana.

It is further requested that additional passports/CNIC may please be cancelled.

Yours Truly
Sd/-
Abdul Hannan
Section officer ( FIA)
Tel-051-9207852
Copy for information to
1 Auditor General of Pakistan Islamabad
2 Director General FIA Islamabad

Mr.Rana should go to court of law againg Secretary Interior and the Minister.

esko hargz na auditor genral banaya jai qk eska irada he k me crpstion kraki canida bhag jao..qk eski 2 id cord bani hui he..ye log to pakistan ko tabha karte he..plz pm gilani sahab pakistan per rahm karo agr ese ofcer rakho ge to pakistan kaise chale ga….humari salah he ke Ex;Dy: auditor genral Saeed Ahmed Panhwer jo es waqat pakistan atomic enregy member finance he..ye bhot hanest or qabil admi he eska mazi bhot acha or emaaamdari se guzra he.agr ap awam ki salah lete ho to plz saeed ahmed ko auditor genral bana lo to behter he./…..hum eski apointment me khsh hee

Saw a programme by Dr. Danish on ARY News last evening on this subject. My God, the man is a criminal! It is the height of poor governance to have him in government’s service, let alone appoint him to a constitutional position equivilent to a Supreme Court Judge! Full marks to Dr. Ayesha Siddiqa for her research and for her courage.

And how many of you know that Ayesha Siddiqa herself was in Audit and Accounts Service and got access to these documents through all those people who are out there to malign him. And having spent some years in Audit and Account Service , there is suspicion of bias on her part and her scholarly ethics demanded that she should not have written this article.
The plot was created a few years back when the persons at helm of affairs at Auditor General’s office noted that when TAnvir Agha will be leaving , Buland Akhtar will be the senior most officer. Zahid Saeed, the present MAG and aspirant to the position of Auditor General was the leader of the gang , which set on a mission to malign him and they succeeded somewhat when they managed to deprive him promotion to BS – 22 three years back and someone else was promoted in his place. Then there was a long struggle on part of Mr. RAna to prove his innocence.

We are waiting for the fireworks to begin at Auditor General’s office when he takes oath.

Regarding the interesting nationality question, there are only one set of establishment rules that binds the civil servants to just ‘inform’ the government in case they are going to tie a knot with an Indian citizen. These rules were framed in early 1960s by the Ayub regime when the thousands of immigrants from India were still having intimate relationship with their families back in India and the country was increasingly facing animosity with its neighbour. The armed services, however, have stricter criteria that require ‘permission’ of the authority to marry a foreign citizen. There have been army officers particularly in the past who imported brides from India despite such restrictions.

Secondly, Pakistan allows dual nationality under bilateral agreements with many countries. Once Pakistan bars certain privilege to its citizens including civil servants, the reciprocal step would be carried out by the respective foreign governments and the result would be that hundreds and thousands of Pakistanis abroad would lose either nationality, many of whom are working with the government and even with the armed services there. Pakistan would thus be risking losing its big source of remittances from abroad.

How many of us know that the commonwealth countries where mostly the dual nationality is allowed do not mind or question the integrity of their citizens having more than one nationality.

US and India have recently moved from the position of restricting their citizens to keep one nationality, and in Pakistan the people are given the impression that the people with dual nationality are of dubious character merely on this ground. Earlier the Indian Diasporas abroad kept only one nationality. The Indians hailing from the rural area could not keep the agri land ownership so they preferred to have Indian citizenship while maintaining the permanent resident status or green card status to enable them to work abroad. While other Indians preferred foreign nationality losing the Indian one because the foreign nationality would not deprive them the right to maintain urban land ownership.

And by the way, the ‘scholars’ like Ayesha Siddiqa never conduct any research. They are provided documents by the vested interests and they become great authors just by reproducing them.

There is no law restricting Pakistanis including the government servants from seeking immigration which is just a kind of visa. When the civil servants are allowed up to 5 years of ex-Pakistan leave, how can they go abroad without seeking an immigration visa. This is a fact well known to the government.

The nationality arrangement is reciprocal with the multiple governments and revising this privilege unilaterally would harm the interests of Pakistan. To be in the government service of pakistan or of any country for that matter, one has to have its nationality. Having extra nationalities does not cast any negative impact on his or her integrity. For that, there are other strict criteria followed when one joins service or when one is promoted and the intelligence reports are counted.

This is pathetic that the SC has also joined the bandwagon of all those talking nonsense and without revisiting the relevant rules. This is ironical that scores of times this point has been raised in the parliament questioning the nationality status of leading statesmen and the government has kept quiet instead of explaining the right legal position.

All hullabaloos against Mr Buland Akhtar Rana is surely being raised by the vested interest on political grounds or on the basis of professional grudge. Let him come forward with the explanation of passports and id cards in his possession before commenting on his integrity. And let the law takes its own course adjudicating the accusations against him and decide accordingly. It is hard to understand that a senior civil servant would hold more than one passport concurrently. These cannot be issued by the authorities and these are only required by smugglers and not by the civil servants who despite having dual nationality and a high caliber prefer to serve their country of birth till the end of their career.

Merely a smiling visitant here to share the love (:, btw outstanding layout. “Individuals may form communities, but it is institutions alone that can create a nation.” by Benjamin Disraeli.