Tariq Ali’s backhanded tribute to Salmaan Taseer – by Mahvish Afridi
Is Tariq Ali a reporter, a Marxist activist or an author of fluffy Islamist novels reminiscent of Nasim Hijazi? Or is he just an ideologue past his sell by date, cashing in on his Communist Cows. Nonetheless, he clearly has his prejudices and his article “Salman Taseer Remembered” (London Review of Books) reveals some of them.
In what should have been a tribute to a childhood friend, Tariq Ali can’t help himself and resorts to his typical petty digs based on his own prejudices and neurosis. He remembers their childhood memories but cannot bring himself to appreciate the late Salman Taseer’s business success and political activism. I suppose that is natural given that Tariq Ali comes from a privileged feudal background and ran off from Pakistan instead of facing any consequences for being part of the Left movement of the late 1960s. Tariq Ali’s grandfather Sir Sikandar Hayat Khan was a leader of the Unionist Muslim League, a feudalist political party formed to represent the interests of the landlords of Punjab. It is the same feudal lord about whom Allama Iqabl wrote: nigah-e-faqr mein shaan-e-sikandri kia hai
In Tariq Ali’s elitist lexicon, being a self made and highly successful businessman is far inferior to being a paid lecture circuit mouthpiece for Hamas and Taliban and their supporters that reside on the fringes of the Far Left.
His glossing over the incarceration that Taseer had to face for his political affiliation with the Pakistan Peoples Party and its leadership are probably an indication of his insecurity for running away to England at the first sign of trouble. Not unlike other members of Pakistan’s ‘fake civil society’, Tariq Ali hates the PPP and the Bhuttos because they deprived him and his likes of the imaginary revolution that Tariq Ali so much wanted to lead but never possessed the guts and heart to do so.
In his back handed tribute to Shaheed Taseer, Tariq Ali reveals more about himself and his prejudice than about the late Governor’s successful life.
“I asked him why he had decided to go into politics. Wasn’t being a businessman bad enough”
Unlike Tariq Ali, Salman Taseer did not come from the powerful, rich and connected feudal family of Sikandar Hayat but from a humble background. Salman Taseer was a highly educated and qualified individual, a chartered accountant, whose vision and business acumen made him successful. In fact, it was Salman Taseer’s pioneering work in the field of media and telecommunications in Pakistan in the 1990s that made him rich and not State patronage; another low blow by Tariq Ali. This is hardly surprising though.
Most times, Tariq Ali’s “views” on Pakistan read like the ISI playbook. His rabid and virulent anti-PPP hatred makes him an ideal candidate for the establishment’s propaganda against the PPP though he is a much better version of General Hameed Gul. Words like “creatures” and “minions” to describe the PPP are symptomatic of the deep hatred that elites like Tariq Ali have with the proletariat nature of PPP politics.
If Tariq Ali had any class, he would have appreciated the brave manner in which Shaheed Governor Taseer had faced down the media, judiciary and sectarian jihadis which lead to his death. Instead Tariq Ali uses Taseer’s death as a podium for his typical PPP bashing rants.
Throughout his “tribute” to Taseer, Tariq Ali positions the army as the only viable force. He critiques them gently (not unlike some other pro-establishment writers in Pakistani press) but his harshest criticism is reserved for the PPP and its leadership and his choice of words reveals a very bitter and petty mind. His critique on the army is the typical propagandist spin and while he carefully does not back security establishment outright, he reinforces the same narratives that are found in the rabidly Pro-Taliban Pakistani media.
Tariq Ali willingly recycles the military establishment’s narrative that 98% of those killed in drone strikes over the last 5 years – estimated to be between 2,000-3,000 – were Pakistani civilians. This propagandist narrative has been effectively countered by researchers such as Farhat Taj and several others working on the drone statistics.
Tariq talks of corruption as a competition between the PPP elected government and the army; it is very easy to see which side he favours even as he falsely posits himself as neutral. In this regard, his sense of economics is as warped as his sense of history and politics:
“Were this to happen a military takeover of the country might be the only way for the army to counter dissent within its ranks by redirecting the flow of black money and bribes (currently a monopoly of politicians) into military coffers.”
This statement reveals the sheer dishonesty on the part of Tariq Ali. The Pakistan army eats up 30% of the poor country’s annual budget which does NOT include perks such as the ISI secret funding, extra money for “fighting the war on terror”, pension funds, armaments expenditure.
For Tariq Ali to gloss over this is the typical manner of those who are part of the English-writing media but whose biases are as destructive as those from the rabid right wing Urdu press lead by the likes of Ansar Abbasi, Hamid Mir and Talat Hussain.
When Tariq Ali states:
“Even before this killing, Pakistan had been on the verge of yet another military takeover”
Is he simply stating that his dead friend was part of the problem of corruption or is this a part of his continuing rant against a dead man who unlike Tariq Ali, was NOT a connected feudal aristocrat but actually had to work for his living.
In this review, Tariq Ali represents the epitome of what is rotten in the state of the English media in Pakistan. Much of the chatter in this elite segment of the media regarding the tragic murder of Governor Taseer revolves around the following themes some of which are present in Tariq Ali’s backhanded tribute to a slain friend:
1) Rabid anti-PPP sentiment as a marker of being part of a self-labelled “civil society”
2) A soft corner for the military establishment where even a soft critique of the establishment is couched in virulent PPP bashing
3) Disdain for the sub-nationalist narrative of the Baloch and the Pushtun
4) A reactionary, opportunistic and self serving anti Americanism that feels as if it has been dictated by a serving colonel of the ISI and which covers the following themes:
i) An utterly one-sided narrative of the drones where the Taliban and foreign mercenaries are counted as civilians and where the views of the Pushtuns are casually dismissed and instead the Taliban are falsely represented as an “indigenous Pushtun movement”
ii) The extremism in Pakistan is falsely linked to the UN sanctioned NATO presence in Afghanistan and the entire issue of extremism and the massacre of minorities is linked to this presence. It is NOT linked to the Islamist policies of the establishment and their channelling of the Saudi billions into the social experiment that views Pakistan as a laboratory experiment for imported medieval practices.
iii) Inherent in this false narrative is also present a pronounced anti-Shia bias. When Tariq Ali writes:
“The Shia sects and some of their more esoteric beliefs have little to do with Islamic theology.”
Clearly, Tariq Ali is not qualitatively any different from a frothing and foaming sectarian mullah from the Sipah-e-Sahaba. When the negative and weird characters in his historical novels, which evoke more Nasim Hijazi than Steinbeck, are Shia and when one of the main protagonists is named Yazeed, then the blatant sectarian prejudice in Tariq Ali’s historic fiction cannot be ignored.
Even the attempts to portray these novels as anti-colonial are contradictory to the notion that Islamism itself is a colonial force and much of the matter in Tariq Ali’s novels is the typical Islamist “mythology that is uncritically recycled” in his shallow novels with very predictable plots and character arcs.
I suppose even self-declared atheists cannot contain their sectarian prejudices.
Tariq Ali shamelessly parades the security establishment point of view on the Taliban and thankfully this is beautifully deconstructed by Naeem Wardeg in “Tariq Ali, Pashtun Nationalism, and Taliban”.
“Nevertheless, Mr. Tariq Ali lumps everything under imperialism and anti-imperialism and finds a link between anti-imperialism, Pashtun nationalism, and Taliban movement. This highly reductionist approach may be based on his understanding of the issue or, more likely, catering to the needs of his own nationality but this also unfortunately conceals more fundamental causes of the problem”
This is further reinforced by Imtiaz Baloch’s column on similar biases of Tariq Ali:
“In general, Tariq Ali’s attitude and behaviour towards Pakistan’s nationalities question sounded like an echo coming from Islamabad’s corridors of power representing the voice of a dominant nationality that has colonized Baluchistan for 60 years, yet whose intelligentsia, including the Left is woefully oblivious of their own role as accomplices.
There seemed a pattern emerging from the speech and the discussion that completed the picture. The old Left and the neo-Taliban have bonded into a new friendship with a common cause – Bush-bashing, for which, Islamic populist sentimentalism, state and strong army have become important tools of the trade. Today, it is not surprising to see former Marxists collude with Jihadis, but to see Tariq Ali in that role was a huge let down”
Suddenly it all made sense, for Tariq Ali. For him, the world had shrunk to the two opposite poles – America on one sides and the global Islamic militancy. Anything anti-American would do, regardless of its nature being oppressive, anti-progressive, anti-democratic and anti-human.
What Tariq Ali said that evening would make Jamaat-e-Islami chief Qazi Hussain Ahmed and former Director General ISI Hameed Gul (godfather of the Taliban) applaud and dance with joy.
Unfortunately, that was not the end of the story. He also managed to present one dramatized case of forcible disappearance of a Pakistani citizen Aafia Siddiqui now in US custody for alleged links with Al-Qaida.
He spent considerable time talking about Aafia Siddiqi, painting a picture of a victim of American atrocities, but he did not utter a single word about the thousands of Sindhi and Baloch political activists who were disappeared by the ISI under Musharraf’s military rule and ended up in the torture cells.
It is in light of these biases that Tariq Ali’s so called “tribute” to his “friend” must be carefully examined.
Unfortunately, such rubbish is not just limited to Tariq Ali but is also found amongst prominent members of Pakistan’s English media and blogs. When Mosharraf Zaidi and Imran Khan can both link Salman Taseer’s murder and extremism in Pakistani society to the NATO presence in Afghanistan, one should not ignore the trends.
In order to evaluate Tariq Ali’s pro-Establishment, anti-PPP, pro-Taliban , anti-Pushtun, anti-Baloch and anti-Shia views, one only has to see how he treats the memory of a dead friend.
I am not sure under what state of mind this article was composed but blatant tirade against Tariq Ali is certainly not justified, most of which is ill-conceived. Salman Taseer did great and emotion run deep over his murder. But the level of emotions vary according to the age, affiliation level and geography. May be not everybody is looking over this event from emotional angle, sad it is, however, the take away from Tariq’s essay is following:
“His party and colleagues, instead of indulging in manufactured grief, would be better off taking the opportunity to amend the blasphemy laws while there is still some anger at what has taken place. But of course they are doing the exact opposite.”
And absolutely correct. PPP and its leadership didn’t show the spine and instead of talking firm against the mullah, they have joined the chorus like anybody on the street. When will the day come when leadership would be done on principled stands rather than the easy refuge to bury the head in sand. Why government cannot take on the hate mongers and call spade a spade. Instead of indulging in hazy statements, it is time to call wrong as wrong.
We shouldn’t be dicey over our stands and intellectuals like Tariq Ali are the world assets and I am sorry that I cannot subscribe the vague argument of putting everybody whom we dislike on ISI’s payroll.
عمران خان کے سوا ، صرف ایک عمران خان کے سوا، تمام لیڈر کھوکھلے ۔ بائیں بازو کے مشہور دانشور طارق علی نے صدمے کی حالت میں لکھا ہے
“Sadly one and only Imran Khan”
۔ گارڈین لندن کی ایک دوسری رپورٹ کا انشاء اللہ میں ترجمہ کروں گا۔
امریکی وفد کو جھیل کے مقابل بلندیوں پر بنے اس کے مکان میں جانا پڑا۔ 30 منٹ کی رسمی ملاقات طے تھی لیکن گھنٹہ بھر کپتان کی ڈانٹ ڈپٹ سننا پڑی: تم اول درجے کے احمق کہ افغانستان میں قتل عام کیا اور خطے کا امن برباد۔ تم کبھی نہ جیتو گے۔ تین برس ہوتے ہیں بھارت کے ایک سیمینار میں صدر بش کے سیاست دان بھائی سے تو کپتان نے یہی کہا ۔ بھونچکا وہ سنتا رہا اور آخرکار سوال کیا کہ اب کیا کریں۔ کہا : بوریا بستر گول کرو اور چلے جاؤ۔
عجیب آدمی ہے ، عمران خان عجیب آدمی ہے۔ مطمئن اور شاد کام ، شوکت خانم ہسپتال کیلئے امریکہ میں پاکستانی آبادیوں کی خاک چھان رہا ہے۔ فون کیا : کسی چینل کو انٹرویو دو، مضمون لکھو یا کم از کم اخباری بیان ۔ کہا : جلدی کیا ہے۔ جماعت اسلامی بچ گئی کہ امریکی دربار میں جاتی ہی نہیں۔
کب جاگے گی، یہ قوم کب جاگے گی۔ تاریخ کے چوراہے پر سوئی پڑی ہے۔ اللہ سے مانگتی نہیں۔ خود پہ بھروسہ نہیں کرتی۔ انتہا ہے ، انتہا ہے۔ آصف زرداریوں، نواز شریفوں، الطاف حسینوں، فضل الرحمانوں، اسفند یاروں اور چودھریوں سے آس لگاتی ہے۔ کب تک آخر کب تک؟
http://search.jang.com.pk/details.asp?nid=489126
Note: If both Mosharraf Zaidi (a liberal proxy) and Haroon-ur-Rashid (an Islamist proxy) are praising the PPP-phobe Tariq Ali, there must be something ‘GOOD’ about him!
An example of Tariq Ali’s venom against Pakistani politicians, the PPP in particular:
…..
Pakistan: sadly, there’s only one Imran Khan
Whether in cricket or in politics, corrupt leaders – bar notable exceptions – are often all Pakistan has
Tariq Ali
guardian.co.uk, Monday 30 August 2010
Poor Pakistan. Floods of biblical proportions; millions homeless; a president who pretends to be shocked by cricket’s latest betting scandal when his own persona is the embodiment of corruption. A prime minister shedding crocodile tears because of the cricketing “shame” rather than tending to allegations that flood-relief money has gone missing.
How many times have I heard apologists for corrupt Pakistani politicians justifying their pillage by arguing that Europe and America also have corrupt politicians. The problem is that in Pakistan that’s all we have, with few exceptions – one of whom is Imran Khan, who was also Pakistan’s finest and most incorruptible captain.
The rotten core of Pakistani cricket long predates the emergence of Zardari and the present bunch of rogue politicians.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/aug/30/imran-pakistan-corrupt-leaders-cricket
@Blissful
I agree with one word which you used to describe Tariq Ali, “asset”.
While the liberal and right wing assets of a ruthless State are carefully proceeding to crush the PPP by resurrecting the MMA/PNA, Tariq Ali’s and hist masters’ political motivations and goals are for all to see except those who are either dishonest or naive.
http://criticalppp.com/archives/36405
Perfectly accurate analysis of Tariq Ali
A total failure in the end & in the end a brain dead person like IK
i fail to understand the blinded mindset of the monopolist leftists. Give the ppp 2/3rds and then demand something like an immediate repeal. God knows when these senseless people will think.
I was honestly hoping for a good write up from a friend of Salmaan Taseer but this is one example of current interests than childhood bonds.
I suggest the whole taseer family be sent compilation of articles written by these liberals as well as crazy islamists to tell them who stands clearly with them and not.
A man with ideology whether religious or marxist should be buried in the same grave…
Ideological positions are always obsessed with prejudices and he can not think objectively.
Problem with Pakistani discourse is the same.
A proxy whether right wing, leftist or liberal will never deviate from the that discourse,
The problem with our civil society is their selective response and sensitivity gauge..they always have…
1. Disgust for parties with rural support, who have brought politics to the common man, and let the rural people come and ask for their share in jobs, education institutions, services, commission and plunder at the urban centres.
2. Criminal Negligence of other nationalities coercively bonded by an oppressive Army in a federation to get benefited by blackmailing the world especially neighbours from the fragile nature of the state, Lashkars of Fierce religious zealots, sitting on the piles of explosives, have tied nuclear jacket with the waist, and nuclear button in the hand.
@Blissful, read the article again, I don’t where it says that Tariq Ali is on the ISI payroll? Yes, his views are no different from any chauvinist army officer. that is for sure. Thanks for the links and glad to see LUBP is taking on these dishonest pseudos who make their money by peddling Hamas but cannot see the gross injustice to the Baloch in their own backyard. Tariq Ali, like Imran Khan is a pucka munafiq!
Glad to see that seasoned Trotsky baba like Tariq Ali is now in line with the only true party in Pakistan and that is Jamaat Islami. You PPP wallas can never get Tariq Ali to support you. The corrupt politicians are the problem of this country and army and Jamaat are the only viable force and Tariq Ali can clearly see that and you people cannot.
@Javed Khan
We will be eternally grateful if Tariq Ali transparently, not subtly, declare his support for the GHQ’s puppet Imran Khan and other Taliban apologists.
Javed Khan says:@ it was the lethal combination of ARMY and JAMAT ISLAMI which split pakistan in two peices,It was the lethal combination of ARMY and JAMAT ISLAMI when pakistan had handed over SIACHEN to INDIA with out fight,It was the lethal combination of ARMY and JAMAT ISLAMI when we fought afghan war and in result we are now on verge of collapse…may ALLAH save PAKISTAN from this lethal combination…
When a scholar like Tariq Ali is swayed by his personal preference without convincing lines to qualify his point of view, he drops himself to a derailed state of thinking.
Imran Khan, no doubt, has some better qualities, as a sincere, and honest social worker but so far he has failed to show any charismatic exposure in politics.
Within a few years, he has changed several contradictory position on National and International issues.
His philosophy about Terrorism and Taliban is still vague and stained by fear.
Pakistan needs a leader-cum-teacher-cum-philosopher who takes a rational and realistic stand without showing cowardice by compromising with religious fanatics.
PPP, in spite of many political and administrative blunders, is still the main hurdle and speed breaker to check the flow of fatal religious fundamentalism.
Twitter archive
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
This show was organized by the ‘international sensitive institution’: http://tinyurl.com/6zu3kel
22 Jan Favorite Reply Delete
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
Will our FREE judiciary try army generals for treason? Why is the ‘Civil Society’ silent on this? http://criticalppp.com/archives/37637
22 Jan
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
How can we expect objectivity from those whose op-eds are regularly fed on ‘advices’ by the ISPR? Liberal proxies of “FREE” media!
22 Jan
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
How many of Tariq Alis, Mosh Zaidis, Cyril Almeidas etc have written on the Shia genocide, Baloch genocide and Pashtun genocide in Pakistan?
22 Jan
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
If we subtract General Zia-ul-Haq’s children and Tariq Ali’s children from Pakistan’s English media, there will be a BIG black hole
22 Jan
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
Does anyone amongst the fake civil society know who is Afzal Chishti and what threats is he currently facing?
22 Jan
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
Many of the fake civil society now claiming Salmaan Taseer’s mantle & criticizing AZ & PPP attacked him harshly during the ‘Lawyer Movement’
22 Jan
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
Fake civil society & fake liberals help create justification for right wing & establishment to corner and attack PPP (e.g., PNA, IJI, MMA)
22 Jan
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
Tariq Ali’s last book on Pakistan was an outright attack on Benazir Bhutto and PPP. In 1980 he wrote a diatribe attacking ZA Bhutto
22 Jan
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
‘Fake’ Civil Society Bible: Always ridicule the party of the poor and the rural. MQM and PML-N R the epitome of urban middle-class intellect
22 Jan
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
Side note: The amount of opportunism, flattery and ‘mutual applause’ at ****** is much higher than elsewhere on this planet
22 Jan
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
‘Fake’ Civil Society Bible: Here is an example of how to pay “tribute” to a dead friend: http://criticalppp.com/archives/37589
22 Jan
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
‘Fake’ Civil Society Bible: Keep ridiculing Veena Malik the way ‘we’ kept posting or enjoying Taseer’s family pictures. Morality = Selective
22 Jan
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
‘Fake’ Civil Society Bible: There R Islamist proxies of the State in the media. Liberal proxies? Stop character assassination!
22 Jan
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
‘Fake’ Civil Society Bible: Label R fine as long as they R directed against Zardari, PPP, politicians, party workers, mullahs, Indians etc
22 Jan
AbdulNishapuri Abdul Nishapuri
Let there be genuine debate on issues w’out anyone being labeled corrupt politicians, blind followers, feudal party, rabid jiyalas, mullahs
A line from Tariq Ali’s tribute: Taseer was a part of “corrupt, inept and failing civilian government”. This line of ‘reasoning’ is reminiscent of the usual anti-politician narrative of the media proxies of Pakistan’s military establishment.
Critical PPP is a PPP-friendly website that provides a bit of a counterpoint to the super-elite “progressives” who live and die in the world of the Westernized academic left (a very tiny world in Pakistan, but rather prominent in the upper-class international network)…
http://www.brownpundits.com/2011/01/23/tariq-ali%E2%80%99s-backhanded-tribute-to-salmaan-taseer-%E2%80%93-by-mahvish-afridi%C2%A0%C2%A0let-us-build-pakistan/
Kal bhi Bhutto qatil tha aj bhi Bhutto qatil tha. Pakistan ko raj k looto j a bhutto j a bhutto. mardood mar khap gia phansi hoe acha hua zaalim. Tahreek nizaam e mustafa k sath jo bhtto ne kia to Bhotto ka injaam aisa hi hona tha . Alla ki lathi bayawaz he.
Shame on Bhutto.
Kal bhi Bhutto qatil tha aj bhi Bhutto qatil ha
It is right. Abdul nishapuri bhi Bhutto ki tarah Traitor he enemy he.
Just when Pakistan needs more moderate Pakistanis to stand up against the religious fanatism and terrorism in Pakistan, Tariq Ali who professes to promote freedom and liberty in the west, condones and apologizes for fundamentalism and mixture of politics and religion in Pakistan.
Tariq Ali came with the obituary on Taseer, only after lots people questioned his silence on the murder of his childhood friend and a secular fighter, who came from a great family of poets like Faiz Ahmed Faiz.
Even before Bombay terrorist act was over, without even bothering to check on the facts, Tariq Ali wrongly blamed it on the home grown terrorism in India. It has been conclusively proven that this terrorist act was plotted, executed and controlled by certain ISI elements in Pakistan. Yet, Tariq Ali did not even have the decency to correct and present the facts in his writings.
Nawaz Sharif took money from Osam Bin Laden to defeat Benazir Bhutto. Recently, the Sharif brothers pleaded with Al Queda to spare Punjab, and told them they could mess around with Pashtuns and Baluchs. The same treacherous Nawaz Sharif and his brother Shahbad Sharif have also ties to criminal elements like Lashkar E Taiba, Jaish-E-Mohammed and Taliban in Southern Punjab itself.
In Pakistani political scene, you see lots of people whose hands are dirty with political assassinations and mixing of politics with fundamentalist Islam. The founder of the country Mohammed Ali Jinnah, who wanted Pakistan to be a Secular Democracy, would be appalled at the ineffective Pakistani politicians, generals and media who are failing common Pakistani people, while the country creeps towards fundamentalism, terrorism and economic ruin.
Ref:http://www.southasiaanalysis.org//papers43/paper4252.html
This article is based on a simple principal ignore your own mistakes and call any one who identifies them a member of the establishment. I have heard Tariq Alis speaches and read his articles on the latest events. He criticizes the Pakistani political parties specially the ppp for being corrupt and ignoring its social roots. It has lost its main agenda of social justice. I am sorry peoples party is one of the reasons why liberals cant voice their opinion with might. PPP leadership did not provide political space so the debate for the blasphemy law could take place. True PPP is still progressive when compared to the rest but it does not mean we should turn a blind eye to their failure to govern and their participation in the politics of appeasement. Tariq ali and many left wingers in Pakistan are critical of the PPP but that does not mean we like musharaf or love what zia did to this country. Please criticalppp be crtical of the ppp. Be left again.
Tariq Ali’s backhanded tribute to Salmaan Taseer – by Mahvish Afridi
ahnnmcgdtd
hnnmcgdtd http://www.g6t942z5mk88h62amf8057lizx96cm3ys.org/
[url=http://www.g6t942z5mk88h62amf8057lizx96cm3ys.org/]uhnnmcgdtd[/url]
リモワ クラシック 横型
prada 社割
サングラス 75 dl
アニアリ 雑誌 付録
アノラック 死語 辞典
靴 横幅 大きい
コーチ cdポーチ
サンローラン ヒョウ 傘
セリーヌ 春夏 いつ
マイケルコース 免税にあるか
ヴィトン 渋谷
ヴィヴィアン 古着
サングラス uv 運転
トリーバーチ 財布 時計
バレンシアガ 汚れ
ドクターマーチン 1461 ワイズ