Those opposing Shafqat’s death penalty should also state Umair Shah’s story!
In Pakistan, human rights appear to be a luxury reserved for convicted criminals, murderers and terrorists only while no such activism is usually seen for ordinary citizens and the genocide facing communities. Take, for example, the level of the VIP security and protocol provided to the banned terrorist outfit ASWJ’s Aurangzeb Farooqi Deobandi by the PPP government in Sindh and similar arrangements for ASWJ’s Ahmed Ludhyanvi and Ramzan Mengal by the PMLN government in Punjab and FC/army in Balochistan respectively. Another simialr example is Asma Jahnagir’s opposition to death penalties to the convicted TTP-ASWJ terrorists while she remains completely silent on the common Deobandi identity of the TTP, ASWJ, LeJ, Jundallah etc terrorists responsible for systematic attacks on Sunni Sufis, Barelvis, Shias, Christians and Ahmadis.
These days, a number of “liberals” and Deobandi clerics are opposing the death penalty to terrorists and murderers as a pretext to save Deobandi takfiris and other terrorists and criminals from justice.
In particular, many (not all) of those opposing death penalty to Shafqat Hussain, a convicted murderer, have one of the two characteristics: (1) they also oppose death penalty to convicted terrorists of the Taliban and Sipah-e-Sahaba (ASWJ-LeJ); (2) they remain consistently silent on Deobandi terrorism against Shias, Sunni Sufis, Ahmadis, Christians, Hindus etc.
Those activists who are currently distributing childhood pictures of a convicted murderer (Shafqat) who killed an innocent 7-year kid (Umair Shah) in cold blood are very careful not to provide the current picture of the Deobandi beareded beast they are tyring to save. Nor are they providing the actual 2004 picture of the killer at the time of his arrest.
In fact, according to BBC Urdu, the only document that proves Shafqat Hussain’s juvenile status at the time of murder is a dubious certificate that was issued only on 22 Dec 2014. They are also careful not to distribute a single picture of Umair Shah, the innocent child, who was killed by Shafqat Deobandi.
To emotionally exploit the death penalty debate, Deobandi clerics and their (pseudo) liberal comrades are telling us the story of an ‘innocent’ boy named Shafqat Hussain who was wrongly sentenced to death when he was only 15 years old. But what’s the story of his victim, Umair Shah, nobody is telling us. There are no pictures of or nrraatives about Umair Shah and his parents!
According to Pakistani journalist Moeed Pirzada: Shafqsat was tried first in Anti-Terror Court, ATC-III of Karachi, for abducting and killing a 7 year old boy, Umair, whom he lured into his room on the pretext of showing him a rabbit. May be this was actually a pedophile case turned ugly because he confessed killing the child Umair on 10th April but started to demand ransom of Rs. 5 lakhs from parents on 12th April. Parents were the complainants and he was arrested on their suspicions. ATC-III awarded him death under Sec. 302 of CrPC and Anti-Terror Legislation. Later Sindh High Court commuted Death Sentence under 302 to five year imprisonment but upheld the death under Anti-terror laws. He exhausted his appeals to Supreme Court and a Review. After exhausting all due process of law he was sentenced to death.
Deobandi apologists are using Shafqat’s story as a pretext to oppose impede and oppose the implementation of death penatlies to the arrested and convicted takfiri Deobandi terrorists of TTP and ASWJ. BBC Urdu and serveral other web sites have published one-sides articles and statements which are biased and uncritical. Here’s the other side of the story.
Shafqat Hussain, then 14 or 15, was working as a watchman in Karachi when he kidnapped a seven-year-old Umair Shah from the neighbourhood in April 2004. A few days later, Umair’s family received calls from Shfaqat’s mobile phone demanding a ransom of Rs 500, 000 (US$7,800) for the boy’s release. Police wa able to locate and arrest Shafqat, who admitted to kidnapping and killing Umair, whose body was recovered from a nearby drain.
Daily Dawn reports that Shafqat was the watchman at a residential complex in Karachi and was found guilty of killing a seven-year-old boy in 2004. Shafqat, the watchman at Nadeem Arcade, had kidnapped Umair and took him to his room where he hit him in his head with a club when he insisted to leave the room. This resulted in instant death of the young boy. The watchman dumped the body the following night in a nearby drain and called victim’s family from different public call offices asking them to deliver ransom though he himself never turned up. Finally, he asked the victim’s father to place the money under a wooden box lying inside the compound of Nadeem Arcade, which led to his arrest as the police investigators found that the box belonged to him.
Appnendix:
Deception by Express Tribune and NGO mafia. They photoshopped Fatima Bhutto’s picture:
BBC Urdu’s one sided story. Is this ethical journalism?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/pakistan/2014/12/141224_shafqat_hussain_family_iv_zs
Mirza Baig said:
Does this humanity law also applies to 14yrs old terrorist involved in murder of christians, shias and other civilians ?
Moeed Pirzada
Shafqat Hussain Death Penalty Case – I am shocked how so many educated people are commenting on this without first understanding the facts. Human Right NGO’s have planted this lie in public mind that somehow Shafqat Hussain was only 14 when he committed murder on 10th April 2004 or when he was first tried in Aug 2004. This is simply not true.
He was tried first in Anti-Terror Court, ATC-III of Karachi, for abducting and killing a 7 year old boy, Umair, whom he lured into his room on the pretext of showing him a rabbit. May be this was actually a pedophile case turned ugly because he confessed killing the child Umair on 10th but started to demand ransom of Rs. 5 lakhs from parents on 12th April. Parents were the complainants and he was arrested on their suspicions. ATC-III awarded him death under Sec. 302 of CrPC and Anti-Terror Legislation. Later Sindh High Court commuted Death Sentence under 302 to five year imprisonment but upheld the Death under Anti-terror laws. He exhausted his appeals to Supreme Court and a Review. After exhausting all due process of law he was set to be executed on 14th Jan 2015 (since his case was falling under Anti-Terror cases) but Interior Minister on application of Human Right Groups stopped Sindh Govt and asked his ministry to check facts related to age. Once he was informed that age issue is only being raised now in 2015 by the HR Groups to delay and seek other options he again cleared it.
HR Groups have every right of finding every excuse possible to poke holes into the prosecution’s case. This is their job world over. And Barrister Sarah Belal needs appreciation because she also says if Shafqat Hussain were not a minor at the time of crime then state law should take its course ie: Execution. So Barrister Sarah is working within the system instead of challenging it upfront like Pakistan Human Right Commission is doing. However media has to do its job. [Watch my program and discussion with Sarah Belal and Zohra Yousaf along with Dunya TV Court Reporter Rana Liaqat, Mon 16 March]
And as responsible media we have been tracing this case for the past several weeks. We have not found any evidence to convince anyone that Shafqat was 14 in 2004. Prosecution and Court Records report him 23-24 in 2004 meaning he is around 34 now. May be he was 22, or 21 or 20 in 2004 and may be he looks young. The idea that ATC in Karachi and Sindh High Court were trying a 14 year old and no one noticed that, not his lawyers and parents is simply ridiculous.
We have also found that recently Human Right lawyers were trying to make birth certificates and school mate affidavits from Azad Kashmir to create a case for creating doubts. This is smart lawyering and can work. However the fact is that Birth Certificate in this case will be one that was issued by a Hospital at the time of birth and was duly entered in the Birth and Death Records of that District or Tehsil; something which we know has not been done in villages or most cities. Another evidence could have been the old Form-B of NADRA Registration Authority of 1980 or 1990 which was applied by the Head of the Family who had entered the names and dates of birth or ages of all family members. But that again has to be found in old records and later day creations are not valid in a case like that. With this twisting and manipulation now known to media any bone scanning and x-ray or DNA tests will also come under strict scrutiny. Tests always have error margins which lawyers may have been thinking of exploiting but now it will be difficult because all tests have to corroborate each other and with physical and physiological examinations.
Perhaps Shafqat Hussain should not have been tried under the Anti-Terror Legislation and laws. After all Mumtaz Qadri’s conviction under ATC have been recently set aside by Islamabad High Court. Shafqat Hussain’s crime was a standard abduction cum ransom and murder case. May be he should have been given life imprisonment and not death penalty. However the enquirers we have made leave us with little doubt that he was indeed the murderer of 7 year old Umair in 2004 and he was not 14 at that time.
Whether there should be a death penalty or not? This is an altogether different philosophical and public policy debate and we will do it at a later stage. But at this stage it is suffice to say that all those who are running this campaign to save Shafqat Hussain, need not fudge the facts to the extent that we loose total belief in ourselves and reality. All this non-sense that Pakistan is hanging children which is being run on social media is terribly flawed and unfortunate.
https://www.facebook.com/MoeedPirzada/posts/775898832478930
’پھانسیاں بین الاقوامی قوانین کی خلاف ورزی ہیں‘
سارہ حسن
بی بی سی اردو ڈاٹ کام، اسلام آباد
2 گھنٹے پہلے
شیئر
اقوام متحدہ نے پاکستان میں سزائے موت پر عملدرآمد کے نتیجے میں ہونے والی پھانسیوں پر تشویش کا اظہار کرتے ہوئے حکومت پر زور دیا ہے کہ پھانسیوں پر عائد پابندی کو جلد بحال کرے۔
اقوام متحدہ نے جمعرات کو جاری ہونے والے بیان میں کہا ہے کہ مجرموں کو سزائے موت دینا سے جرائم یا شدت پسندی میں کمی کے شواہد نہیں ملے ہیں اور بین الااقوامی قوانین کے تحت پاکستان اس بات کا پابند ہے کہ وہ پھانسیوں پر عملدرآمد روکے۔
پاکستان کے دفتر خارجہ نے ہفتہ وار بریفنگ میں کہا ہے کہ سزائے موت عملدرآمد بین الاقوامی قوانین کی خلاف ورزی نہیں ہے۔
گذشتہ سال پشاور میں فوج کے زیرِ اہتمام چلنے والے سکول پر دہشت گردوں کے حملے کے بعد سزائے موت پر عملدرآمد شروع کرنے کا فیصلہ کیا گیا تھا۔ آرمی پبلک سکول پر طالبان کے مہلک حملے میں 134 بچوں سمیت ڈیڑھ سو افراد ہلاک ہوئے تھے۔
پہلے مرحلے میں دہشت گردی کے مقدمات میں ملوث افراد کی سزا پر عملدرآمد شروع ہوا لیکن حال ہی میں حکومت نے سزائے موت پر عائد عارضی پابندی مکمل طور پر اُٹھا لی ہے۔ جس کے بعد دہشت گردی کے جرائم میں سزا پانے والے مجرموں کے ساتھ ساتھ دوسرے مجرموں کو بھی تختہِ دار پر لٹکایا جا رہا ہے۔
اس سے قبل پچھلے چھ برس سے پاکستان میں پھانسی کی سزاؤں پر عمل درآمد معطل تھا۔
اقوام متحدہ کا کہنا ہے کہ ایک محتاط اندازے کے مطابق پاکستان میں آٹھ ہزار قیدی سزائے موت کے منتظر ہیں۔
اقوام متحدہ نے اپنے بیان میں سزائے موت پانے والے ایک نابالغ مجرم شفقت حسین کے معاملے پر گہری تشویش ظاہر کی ہے اور کہا ہے کہ ایسا مجرم جس نے 18 سال سے کم عمر میں کوئی جرم کیا ہو، اُس کی سزا ختم کی جائے۔
اقوام متحدہ کے سیکریٹری جنرل نے کہا ہے کہ زندہ رہنا کسی بھی شخص کا بنیادی انسانی حق ہے۔
سیکریٹری جنرل بان کی مون نے کہا کہ’ اکیسویں صدی میں پھانسی کی کوئی گنجائش موجود نہیں ہے۔ دنیا میں سزائے موت دیے جانے کا رجحان ختم ہو رہا ہے اور اقوام متحدہ کے 160 سے زائد رکن ممالک میں مختلف طرح کے قوانین، رسم و رواج اور مذہبی رجحانات پائے جاتے ہیں، یا تو انھوں نے سزائے موت دینا ختم کر دی ہے یا پھر پھانسیوں پر عملدارآمد روک دیا ہے۔‘
ادھر اقوام متحدہ میں انسانی حقوق کے کمشنر نے پاکستان میں پھانسی دیے جانے کی مذمت کرتے ہوئے کہا ہے کہ دنیا کوئی بھی عدالت مکمل طور پر بے خطا نہیں ہو سکتی ہے۔
پھانسی پر پابندی کا مطالبہ
اکیسویں صدی میں پھانسی کو گنجائش موجود نہیں ہے۔ دنیا میں سزائے موت دئیے جانے کا رجحان ختم ہو رہا ہے اور اقوام متحدہ کے 160 سے زائد رکن ممالک میں مختلف طرح کے قوانین، رسم و رواج اور مذہبی رجحانات پائے جاتے ہیں، یا تو انھوں نے سزائے موت دینا ختم کر دی ہے یا پھر پھانسیوں پر عملدارآمد روک دیا ہے۔
بان کی مون
انھوں نے بتایا کہ دسمبر 2014 میں اقوام متحدہ کی جنرل اسمبلی میں پھانسیوں پر پابندی کے حوالے سے قراردار پیش کی گئی اور 117 ممالک نے سزائے موت کے عملدرآمد پر پابندی کے حق میں فیصلہ دیا ہے۔
اقوام متحدہ نے پاکستان سے کہا ہے کہ وہ پھانسیوں پر دوبارہ پابندی عائد کرے اور ملک میں رائج عدالتی نظام کو بہتر بنانے کے لیے وہ پاکستان کرنے کو تیار ہے۔
اس سے قبل بھی سیکریٹری جنرل بان کی مون نے وزیراعظم نواز شریف کو فون کیا تھا اور کہا تھا کہ پاکستان میں پھانسیوں پر عمل درآمد بند کر کے اس پر عائد پابندی دوبارہ بحال کی جائے جبکہ یورپی یونین نے بھی پھانسیوں پر تحفظات کا اظہار کیا ہ
http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/pakistan/2015/03/150319_un_pakistan_hanging_sr