Paris shootings, Tariq Ali and the Deobandi Wahhabi apologia – by Abdul Nishapuri
Tariq Ali continues to ofbuscate and justify transnational Wahhabi-Deobandi terrorism behind pseudo post-colonial, Marxist and anti-imperial discourse and the allegations of Islamophobia. In his explanation of the Charlie Hebdo massacre and other acts of transnational terrorism by the ISIS, Al Qaeda, Taliban, Sipah-e-Sahaba (ASWJ), Boko Haram etc, not once does he refer to the common Deobandi Wahhabi identity of terrorists and the common hate ideology that gels these terrorists together against all forms of governments, rulers and religious and ethnic minorities. Same Deoabndi Wahhabi terorists who are massacring Sunni Sufis and Shias in Pakistan, Iraq and Syria are also massacring Christians and atheists in Russia, Jews and Christians in Africa and Europe and all other non-Deobandi non-Wahhabi groups across the globe. They draw their inspiration to murder others, not from Karl Marx or Classism but from Ibn Taymiyya, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab and Darul Uloom Deoband.
Yes, there is Islamophobia in France and elsewhere in the West just as there is antisemitism in almost all Muslim countries. But why hide the fact that Wahhabi-Deobandi terrorism of the Al Qaeda, ISIS, Sipah-e-Sahaba (ASWJ), Taliban (TTP), Boko Haram draws its motivation to massacre ALL non-Deobandi non-Wahhabis from its own violent ideology, and doesn’t need an act of imperialism, colonialism, blasphemy etc to justify or execute its murderous agenda.
Tariq Ali (fake Marxist /Deobandi atheist), Nouman Ali Khan (Deobandi evangelist, masked Takfiri), Mehdi Hasan (Kufi Shia, populist), Tarek Fatah (known ShiaPhobe, Deobandi-Wahhabi apologist, Islamophobe) and other anlaysts of their ilk are extremely dishonest when it comes to an objective analysis of transnational Wahhabi Deobandi terrorism. In comparison to dishonest poeple such as the aforementioned ones, analysts such as Patrick Cockburn, Robert Fisk, Aamir Hussaini offer the most objective and balanced discourse on transnational terrorism and its Wahhabi-Deobandi roots which are galvanized (not generated) by none else than the Saudi-West partnership.
Here’s a text of the Tariq Ali’s interview that was published in Outlook India.
It has been going on since 9/11. The West refuses to address the causes. Any attempt to explain why is usually denounced and so it becomes civilisational, or good versus evil, or free speech versus barbarism. The fact is that the West has reoccupied the Arab world with disasters in Syria, Iraq and Libya where things are much worse than under the previous authoritarian regimes. This is the prime cause of the radicalisation of young Muslims. The Left is in a bad way or seen as part of the problem, so they go to the mosque, search for hardline solutions and are eager to be used by jehadis.
What is the context in which the Paris killing should be seen?
As I described above but vis-a-vis France, these guys were a pure product of French society. Unemployed, long-haired, into drugs, alienated till they saw footage of US torture and killings in Iraq.
So you think western interventionist policies in the Arab and Muslim world are responsible for radicalisation of sections of Muslims in Europe and the United States?
In my opinion, one hundred per cent.
How serious is Islamophobia in France and other European countries?
France is the worst in Europe and tries to mask it by proclaiming its secular values (sound familiar?), but these values don’t apply to Islam. In fact, French secularism means anything but Islam. And when satirical magazines taunt them, they react. It’s as simple as that.
Do you see this as a clash of liberal, western values against conservative, fundamentalist ideas?
No. I think democracy is on the decline in the West. Ruling parties are the same: neo-liberalism at home and wars abroad. There is a volatility that I have not seen in Europe since the ’60s and ’70s. This time it’s born out of despair, not hope, except in Greece and Spain, where new alternatives are emerging. A syriza (the radical left party) victory in Athens on January 25 would be a small step forward.
How should the idea of secularism in France be seen? Is mocking religious beliefs of others a key element of it?
It is, but it’s concentrated on Islam, a tiny bit on Catholicism, while Judaism is usually left well alone. Why not show Moses regularly gang-raping Palestinian men and women? Just as an idea.
As a political activist, author and journalist, how do you see the idea of ‘freedom of expression’ in Europe and other western societies? Don’t they have ‘red lines’ which should not be crossed?
Of course they do. The press in most of Europe today has very clear lines. The diversity has gone and the bulk of the media are an essential pillar of what I have called the ‘extreme centre’—the ruling bloc in Europe. The uniform way in which the Euro-American liberal media attacked the Bolivarian governments was one indication. The defence of neo-liberalism and wars is another. The virtual exclusion of dissenting voices is common to most of the media. Even Germany has seen a decline and The Guardian in Britain has witnessed a coup on its op-ed pages. The (Julian) Assange and (Edward) Snowden stories were handed to them on a gold plate, but there is now a backlash, and self-congratulations on Snowden will not suffice.
Some key players at Charlie Hebdo were part of the ‘Street Fighting Years’ of 1968. What do you have to say about the way they evolved?
They evolved sharply to the right, like French society as a whole. A friend of mine recently wrote: “…did I ever tell you that Cabu gave me my first job when I was still at the lycee? For five months I was at Le Canard Enchaine; that was in the late ‘80s…. Then he relaunched Charlie Hebdo and I joined him for a while, but I never felt at ease with this team and I broke off with them during the war in Yugoslavia (obviouslyCharlie was in favour of the NATO intervention) and I moved to London…. Then by the late ‘90s Charlie became definitely a right-wing fanzine, always trying to please the establishment and in favour of ALL the colonial wars…. Cabu was an anarcho libertaire and Wolinski was not a bad bloke (a real artist)…the last time I saw him was many years ago at a stand at la fete de l’Humanite…always in solidarity with Cuba….” That was a long time ago. The only decent daily paper of record in France is the online Mediapart, which exposes graft and corruption in high places and is feared by the establishment.
While hundreds of thousands came out to join the rally against the Paris killing, there was hardly any protest visible on the death of 2,000 people at the hands of Boko Haram in Nigeria. What are the reasons for that?
Blacks killing blacks never bothers Europe. It’s a long tradition. The Belgian rulers killed between 10-12 million Congolese in the early 19th century. Arthur Conan Doyle wrote a pamphlet denouncing the atrocities (Conrad wrote a novel) and there was a solidarity movement of sorts, but limited. Nowadays, the killings and drone attacks in the Horn of Africa, the Middle East, Af-Pak are so common that the haramis of Boko Haram are used to show barbarism but not too much else…. Nigeria’s leader, Goodluck Jonathan, has a lot to answer for as well.
But the attitude that we talk about in France and other European countries is not against Muslims alone, it is against immigrants in general. Will this play an important role in the coming elections in the UK?
True, but Islamophobia is rife all over the continent and has to be distinguished from hostility to immigrants or the Roma who have been in Europe for over a thousand years! In Britain, the campaign mounted by the racist UK Independent Party is concentrated against European migration (Poles, Romanians, Albanians etc) and is part of their anti-EU stance. The extreme-centre parties are pandering to UKIP in the most shameless fashion.